Its happening

[Anonymous No.29693962]

Nano is about to go viral on twitter, don't say I didn't warn you.

https://twitter.com/ApolloNano/status/1364909285285584897

[Anonymous No.29694529]

[Anonymous No.29696329]

>>29693962
why, what happened with NANO?

[Anonymous No.29696743]

>>29696329

Nano has been gradually increasing in rank as the most mentioned cryptocurrency on twitter over the past few months. It has attracted the attention of the GME crowd, the DOGE crowd, and is beginning to seep into the normie consciousness.

about 3 hours ago a twitter tip bot went live, and it already has over 2.5k retweets. If it hits trending on twitter, you know full and well what to expect.

[Anonymous No.29696872]

My lil roastiecoin doin sum

[Anonymous No.29696991]

>>29693962
>put favorite coin next to all the other well known coins on a graph
>look look my coin is popular!

[Anonymous No.29697076]

You can expect to see more articles like this as well. Currently trending.

Reminder, Nano is eco-friendly, decentralized, fully distributed, has no miners, zero inflation, was not given out via an ico but instead by manual captcha farming, can be transferred anywhere in the world with a sub 1 second confirmation time with absolutely zero fees or inflation.

[Anonymous No.29697104]

>>29693962
> link that high but with absolutely no movement...
I wonder if there's been more dev selling than we've been watching

[Anonymous No.29697263]

>>29693962
> every time Bitcoin is mentioned, Nano spam follows
> nobody knows or cares what the fuck Nano is
> rinse and repeat
> Nano is going viral

[Anonymous No.29697377]

>>29696991
You can check for yourself, retard. https://twitter.com/CoinTrendz/status/1365028810706604033

CoinTrendz has been a very reliable indicator of popularity and trending interest. It was accurate with Link, it has been accurate with Doge, and it has been accurate with Eth as well.

[Anonymous No.29697516]

>>29697263
this, it's desperate nano bag holders spamming every crypto-related thread, kek

[Anonymous No.29697533]

>>29697104
Link was #2 for all of 2020 it seemed like. I regularly search $nano on twitter to keep up with data and trends, and have seen this chart numerous times over the years. Generally when Nano has been on it prior, it was barely in 10th place, with Chainlink at times even being more popular than BTC in terms of discussion. In general Link was right up there behind BTC and ETH though.

[Anonymous No.29697581]

>100% premined
>no known legitimate distribution
>non-bitcoin proof of work altcoin
>no privacy
>no smart-contract/transaction script abilities

its literally DOA. some kid managed to slow it to a crawl

[Anonymous No.29697655]

>>29697581
Literal bullshit

[Anonymous No.29697711]

>>29697377
Jig is up retard. Nobody wants this shit. Even Reddit banned this coin from being shilled. Bet your the dude who went all into nano with and is now sweating about his investment.

[Anonymous No.29697995]

>>29697711
Why would I be sweating when I am up several hundred thousand dollars, while holding a direct competitor with better tech than the leading champ? Bitcoin was inevitable due to issues with the dollar. Nano is inevitable due to issues with BTC.

[Anonymous No.29698323]

>>29697076
literal shitskin cringe

>eco-friendly
requires proof of work, uses huge amounts of energy compared to proof of stake coins at even minimal tx/s

>decentralized
delegated proof of stake, known limited security compared to proof of work or real proof of stake. large % of nano were literally voting for dead validators not that long ago.

>fully distributed
i.e. 100% premined, centralized distribution without any auditability or accountability, worthless as a store of value or payment coin because of it.

>no miners
can't mine when nobody was ever given the chance to distribute coins in a decentralized way

>zero inflation
terrible choice for something people expect to use as a payment coin, no incentive to hold, no incentive to spend. just use a stablecoin.

>was not given out via an ico but instead by manual captcha farming
was mostly distributed to a handful of individuals that bought 10,000s of captcha solves for $100

>can be transferred anywhere in the world with a sub 1 second confirmation time with absolutely zero fees or inflation
like any other second-layer network but tied to a worthless token instead of being a zero-fee instantly transferable bitcoin, or ether, or stablecoin, something people want, or something you won't get taxed sending or receiving

just don't bother.

[Anonymous No.29698463]

>>29693962
Nano is a scam and you know it.
>>/biz/thread/S28856161

Pic. Nano scammers looking for new paypigs aka "investors"

[Anonymous No.29698675]

>>29697995
>Nano is inevitable due to issues with BTC.
Try Reddit kek. Nobody falls for that here. People will unironically use BSV before they even come close to thinking about nano.

[Anonymous No.29698786]

>>29696743
you get 1 free coin ?

[Anonymous No.29698942]

>>29697076
>decentralized
Is this a joke? Nano foundation shuts down nodes they don't like through a backdoor and/or exploit. Pic.

[Anonymous No.29699020]

>>29698323
You literally have no idea what you are talking about.

>eco-friendly
Nano PoW: 0.112Wh
Price per kWh: 0.15$
Cost of one tx: 0.15/1000*0.112 = 0.0000168$

>decentralized
Nano has a higher Nakamoto coefficient than BTC. Nano has a Nakamoto coefficient of 6, and is almost at 7.

>no miners
Nano was given out via faucet that required captcha solving. It was worth less than a cent back then, fractions of one really. This is no different than miners who were mining 10,000 BTC with their Windows 7 systems.

>zero inflation
Nano can be divisible up to 30 decimal points. Inflation ruins the value of a currency over time. There will never be an issue with there not being enough units of divisible nano. 1 Nano = 1000000000000000000000000000000 raw nano units

>was not given out via an ico but instead by manual captcha farming
and btc was originally traded for a pizza, 10,000 of them in fact. This is how a currency circulates, it changes hands.

>can be transferred anywhere in the world with a sub 1 second confirmation time with absolutely zero fees or inflation
Why are you even in crypto in the first place? Go use your cash app. People like myself cannot legally use such services for the businesses we deal in. If you like daddy government and the banks controlling your life, enjoy, but some of us here are of the same cut as those who got BTC to where it is today.

Sound money and DLT will lead to a revolution unlike one we have ever seen before.

[Anonymous No.29699064]

>>29697076
>decentralized,
It takes only a mild 200-300 tps spam to crash the Nano network. After that, Nano Foundation must send around zip files to node operators to "update" the transaction history.

[Anonymous No.29699127]

>>29698942
Literal FUD, sorry you lost your life savings on an exchange hack. But I certainly enjoyed buying your nano from the hacker on the cheap.

[Anonymous No.29699209]

>>29699127
Debunk it then.

[Anonymous No.29699211]

>>29697076
>decentralized, fully distributed, has no miners, zero inflation, was not given out via an ico but instead by manual captcha farming
So how large a portion of the initial Nano distribution did Colin and his friends have? 60%? 70%? Any question regarding hard data related to Nano's initial distribution will get you insta-banned on discord, plebbit etc. They moved millions around on Bitgrail, both before and after bankruptcy. Colin refuses to answer any questions and giving empirical data regarding distribution, and he and his friends have been dumping Nano into oblivion since Jan 2017

Colin said he would release a financial statement for Nano Foundation some months ago. Of course, he lied. At least he now is saying a big fuck you to the desperate and moronic Nano community publicly. He is using Nano Foundation's money in private lawsuits, slushing money to George Coxon - buying her crashed companies and paying corruption money to Espen Enger, so he would protect them from any lawsuit from the Bitgrail Victim group.

[Anonymous No.29699347]

>>29699209
Debunk what, the 50 copypasta post that are coming that were answered several years ago? The guy is a flat out liar throwing every piece of fud he can everytime Nano is mentioned. Adversity of this level indicates legitimacy, so thanks for that.

[Anonymous No.29699408]

>>29697076
>decentralized, fully distributed, has no miners, zero inflation, was not given out via an ico but instead by manual captcha farming
Nano has some of the worst distribution in crypto. For many, Nano Foundation dumping Nano worth 300 000 USD on Nano bagholders each month sounds insane. Well, not so much when Colin is using funds from Nano Foundation to fight private messy divorce and slander accusations in court.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.746752/gov.uscourts.cacd.746752.1.0.pdf

Has Colin completely lost it? Insane statement in a legal document:
> (In layman's terms, at present, it [Nano] is the Cadillac of cryptocurrency.)
>On 28 January 31, 2018, the periodical Medium declared that it "is objectively the best pure cryptocurrency"

After dumping like a madman, Colin claims to have only 5-6 million Nano left.
Colin is angry that confidential information were leaked from this lawsuit and confidential settlement agreement:
https://decrypt.co/6396/nano-cryptocurrency-seeks-dismissal-170-million-rescue-fork-lawsuit

From Nano Foundations/Colins lawsuit:
>They tell their customers 'if you really believe in Nano ..... go to this small exchange in Italy that we don't know anybody and we have nothing to do but we completely vouch for him and he's running a legitimate exchange', we're gonna [sic] give him the Nano, he's gonna [sic] give us money every time he sells a Nano, he's gonna [sic] take half and we're gonna take half, we're gonna [sic] get rich and then one day there's gonna [sic] be an exit scam and then you're gonna [sic] be out $150 million."
> Mr. LeMahieu and the other Nano developers face the prospect of a jail sentence in a current Federal action

[Anonymous No.29699432]

>>29699347
>every fud is a lie, everything i'm shilling is right, it really is the better bitcoin!!!!

[Anonymous No.29699522]

>>29699408
The Nano foundation only has a few hundred thousand Nano left. Once again, you are literally making shit up. You are not worth responding to with your pilpul.

[Anonymous No.29699576]

>>29697076
>>29699408
(cont.)
>"Uhhhhh Nano, the CEO and the head guy at Nano [guess he is talking about Zack Shapiro] who holds 90% of the Nano at like $15 it was worth $1.4 billion, I think it's down to like $4, so I think it's only worth like $400,000,000 now. Uhhh, he got divorced from his wife last year. He decided that he was ready. He deserved better because he was now rich. She took all the money. And then, the financial affidavit, she, they, argued about how much the Nano was worth and what the Nano was. But I will tell you this: he said it had value and he said that he believed it was going up and he believed it was a security cause [sic] he put it on his security side of the affidavit."

Coline whined and demanded this information not to be made public. However his claim is absurd:
>Mr. LeMahieu is a private citizen.
A CEO of a foundation that at one point in time had a multi-billion dollar market cap and hundreds of thousands of "investors" is not a "private citizen".

[Anonymous No.29699708]

>>29699347
>that were answered several years ago
lol, give link psychotic Nano liar. Do it. ALL you Nano scammers have is ad hominem, mudslinging and hysterical mass-flagging of comments. Pic related.

[Anonymous No.29699755]

>>29693962
nano is literally a shit coin by the bitgrail scammers anyone investing into it is a fucking moron

[Anonymous No.29699847]

>>29697076
All Nano scammers have is criminal and lying devs, plus a horrific shitcoin of a tech trainwreck Nano isk is wide open for spam attacks, due to your feeless transactions, i.e. volunteers taking all the costs for no reason. No wonder Nano's hysterical core dev Colin is threatening to sue anyone who stress test or spam test Nano. Pic.

[Anonymous No.29699933]

>>29697076
Nano is wide open for spam attacks. The last attack to crash the Nano network had basically no costs. Pic.

[Anonymous No.29699985]

>>29696743
>most mentioned
because yo uguys wont shut the fuck up

[Anonymous No.29700033]

>>29693962
Only reason why anyone has heard about Nano is that they lied about Nano having 7000 tps (reality was 1% of promised tps) when BTC network was clogged in late 2017. Worse Nano has the absurd business model that they can get suckers to run the network for free, zero compensation whatsoever, and thus have zero fees. Works well when NOBODY is using the crashed tech network. However, if you ask how much it will cost in CPU, IO, bandwidth, hardware etc to run a global network on their plebbit page, /r/NanoCircleJerk, you will be banned within seconds. Same if you ask anything related to their crashed tech, cost analysis for a global network based on volunteers taking all the costs, swindle, corruption and scam. Nano provides zero real-world transparency.

[Anonymous No.29700156]

>>29693962
>>29700033
The sad reality behind the vile 7000 tps claim from Nano scammer devs, Jewish grifters and Italian swindlers, was 75 tps. Even today, two years later, Nano scammers can't even muster 10% of what they claimed in 2017.

[Anonymous No.29700238]

>>29693962
>>29699847
>>29700033
It was well known in the community that Nano devs and team were lying through their teeth. Vitalik even tweeted about it

[Anonymous No.29700263]

>>29693962
or maybe the word nano is used a lot for other things

[Anonymous No.29700324]

>>29700156
Can I just ask you one question though? Your material is good and you raise good points but why are you SO committed to FUDing nano? You are literally in every thread without fail posting the same stuff. Why?

[Anonymous No.29700429]

>>29697076
Nano is not free, can't scale, and is wide open to spam attacks. Nano's claim in their whitepaper about unlimited scaling is absolutely rubbish. It's just as crazy as me stating that I will go the moon using my bicycle, proudly claiming that my speed is unlimited, only restricted by my muscle strength and I am getting stronger and stronger for each day, and very soon I will be strong enough to get such a high speed that I will jump to the moon. Ridiculous. Do they have any written plan for 100 000 TPS? Any cost analysis? ETH and other competitors will roll out 100K to 1 million TPS in a matter of months/year.

Nano has done zero cost analysis for 100 000 TPS bandwidth, CPU, and IO. Random volunteers are supposed to take costs involving millions of USD each year, working on the network 24/ with no downtime, holidays, Christmas etc. Nano has done nothing to provide how it is feasible for Nano to reach 100 000 TPS within the next years. However, imagining it's possible, Nanoids admits that Amazon and large operators like them will take all the costs and burdens of operating the system. That's a clear and open single point of failure (SPOF) and is the very reason why people choose crypto currencies over banks and centralized payment systems. That Nano is not able to identify a clear and basic SPOF in their system is worrisome on multiple levels.

Pic Nano hodler getting assraped since January 2018 by the Nano Devs, Italian scammers, and the market, buying some more, while screaming:
"2 da moooOooooooOooon!!!"

[Anonymous No.29700461]

>>29693962
Gonna ask this again, because I never get a coherent answer in these posts.

Why should anyone care about the price of Nano? Why wouldn't I just keep my money in Bitcoin, or ETH, or XLM, or whatever will actually make me money, and swap to Nano if I reeeeally feel like paying for coffee with crypto? Because at the moment cash is still killing any use case that Nano has.

[Anonymous No.29700481]

>>29700263
The tag specifically searches for $nano, not #nano

[Anonymous No.29700598]

wow bot. now fuck off with nano

[Anonymous No.29700681]

>>29698786
I've got 0.10$

[Anonymous No.29700700]

>>29699127
>Literal FUD, sorry you lost your life savings on an exchange hack. But I certainly enjoyed buying your nano from the hacker on the cheap.
More lies from the Nano scammers. I knew about the TPS lie from Nano pre-Bitgrail and got my assets/profit out. When the scam/crash happened, I had to watch people losing all their money, some talked about suicide and some very likely did commit suicide. I tried to help as many as I could and many wanted to organize donations etc but we got zero help from Nano Foundation. They kicked all discussions about Bitgrail from their plebbit page and refused to do anything to help the victims. There are numerous ways and technical solutions they could have done to help the victims and offset their losses. They did nothing and instead jumped into an orgy of hedonism, woke hard left hypocrisy and pushing hard for feminism/BLM/womenintech/globohomo etc. I am so disgusted. After that, the Bitgrail victims got scammed again by Nano Foundations dirty deal with Espen Enger, only to have Bitgrail victims scammed a third time when Espen Enger exit scammed with their donations.

To have these dirty Nano lefties running around lecturing other people about decency and morality is just disgusting. Pic.

[Anonymous No.29700706]

>>29700461
>Why should anyone care about the price of Nano?

The same reason people cared about BTC before it became a store of value.

[Anonymous No.29700975]

>>29699522
>The Nano foundation only has a few hundred thousand Nano left.
As I said three years ago would happen. The comment you respond to is talking about Nano team/devs/friends PRIVATE Nano holdings.

[Anonymous No.29700998]

>>29696743
where is nano offered exchange wise

[Anonymous No.29701101]

>>29700324
This is the reason, anon:
>>29700700

[Anonymous No.29701210]

>>29700975
I could honestly care less about what claims are made by idiots like yourself who lost their savings on a shit exchange. Get over it, your money is gone. The court found BitGrail responsible for the hack. You are simply posting slimy accusations from people in the same boat as yourself. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if you were involved with some of the people trying to sue the NF due to your own stupidity.

Responsibility is hard. Wasting years of your life coping with the fact that you were not responsible has got to be a lot harder though.

[Anonymous No.29701315]

>>29701210
You are repeating already debunked lies. Here, Nano scammer:
>>29700700

[Anonymous No.29701402]

>>29693962
>>29697076
Even former Nano core dev Zack Shapiro has no faith in Nano. Pic.

[Anonymous No.29701465]

>>29700706
So... the answer is the price should effectively be zero?

[Anonymous No.29701468]

>>29700998
Binance.us and Binance.com

Kucoin and Kraken as well

Watch this video, claim some Nano from the airdrop, and send it back and forth between yourself or a friend. It is literally what we all have been waiting for, at least those of us who desire a usable form of decentralized digital cash.

My business was destroyed by the kikes and their banking systems. I was literally denied the ability to accept payments via the Visa network, Paypal, Skrill, CashApp, VenMo, Zelle, etc. For selling fucking supplements. Bitcoin can't address my needs. And I know I am not alone here, being involved in one of the largest growing industries in the states, people in my field are looking for alternatives. If you think top down control isn't going to get worse, you are in for a fucking surprise.

[Anonymous No.29701653]

>>29701468
>My business was destroyed by the kikes and their banking systems.
Hello there, I am Nano dev, Zack Shapiro. Hope you Nano fans enjoyed me dumping my million heavy bags on your heads, while Nano was crashing, the very bags I got out from Bitgrail while you were stuck and tried to get your "KYC" from Bomber (lol). We were on the phones the whole day with bomber to get those 1.5 million Nano out, right before the "hack" and BitGrail was officially insolvent.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/7xqxqu/500_thousand_nano_was_moved_today_out_of_one_of/duaj73z/

In addition, I had to tweet like crazy to the small people, the ungrateful Nano "investors" that were pestering us all the time with their, *whiny voice* "I have 8.3 Nano and I am so worried Zack, please help me". The worst part of living in America is dealing with white people. They will never be winners. He, he, he, he...Take that as a lesson schmucks, don't listen to guys on the internet, like me, when doing financial decisions. Pic is me before you gave me my millions of $$. Aaaah, life is gooOOooOod. L'chaim!

[Anonymous No.29701881]

>>29701468
>My business was destroyed by the kikes and their banking systems
If you like Nannis, you like Jew Ginsberg.

Support Nano so Nano can support radical feminism, Jews, ultra-liberal anti-racist anti-white politics.

Powerful pic, Nano Celebrating Ginsburg

[Anonymous No.29701919]

>>29699020
>Nano has a higher Nakamoto coefficient than BTC. Nano has a Nakamoto coefficient of 6, and is almost at 7.
Kek, stop lying.

[Anonymous No.29702055]

>>29701468
Powerful.

Nano stands with Saiful Islam against white racism in the West.

#BLM #NoWhiteAmerica #Diversity #Solidarity #OpenBordersNOW #Antifa #POCAmerica #POCEurope #NANO #SmashAfash #JIHAD

[Anonymous No.29702207]

>>29701468
Strong and powerful message from Nano there.

Nano supports tranny rights

#walnutsauce #TrannyRights #BLM #WokeNano #LoveIsLove #RoughAnalSexYAY

[Anonymous No.29702428]

>>29701468
Forgot video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKt9KepQQF4