/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.30077426]

Have you bought some NFTs, anon?

[Anonymous No.30077529]

>>30077426

[Anonymous No.30077585]

I bought the Mona Lisa

[Anonymous No.30077606]

>>30077426
do NFTS come with the ability to use the art as a logo and send cease and desist letter to people who repost it? otherwise its a scam.

[Anonymous No.30077643]

>>30077426
why the fuck are there so many god damn NFC shill threads
>Buy My JPEG!
>Graphic Design in my passion!
what the fuck

[Anonymous No.30077673]

>>30077606
Yeah, you go to Kleros court

[Anonymous No.30077784]

i only buy rare pepes.

[Anonymous No.30077791]

I only sell high quality PNGs here. Il sell 1 PNG for 10 JPEGs.

[Anonymous No.30077815]

>what are certificates of authenticity

[Anonymous No.30077828]

>>30077426
I'm holding out for the killer app. Anything NFT today is money laundering or just retards running the price up on empty hype.
Wait until the next MTG is NFT based.

[Anonymous No.30077907]

>>30077673
I laughed out loud and it scared the customers

>sirs???

[Anonymous No.30077924]

>>30077784
hey that's my pepe

[Anonymous No.30077964]

>>30077784
cheers

[Anonymous No.30078063]

>>30077585
prove it faggot

[Anonymous No.30078117]

>>30077828
>I'm holding out for the killer app.
It already exists, you're just too dumb to see it.

[Anonymous No.30078622]

>>30077426
But taking a picture of the mona lisa isn't creating a carbon copy.

[Anonymous No.30078745]

>>30078117
I'm all ears if you want to link to something. All of the shit I have seen so far looks like it was made in MS Paint over the span of 1 weekend.

[Anonymous No.30078977]

>>30078063
checkem

[Anonymous No.30079112]

>>30078977
checked

[Anonymous No.30079420]

>>30077673
kek

[Anonymous No.30079543]

>>30078977
Kek
I unironically believe more in 4chan dubs than NFTs

[Anonymous No.30079637]

They're just another money laundering scheme.

[Anonymous No.30079649]

>>30078977

smart investment checked

[Anonymous No.30079672]

I can tell they're British

[Anonymous No.30079858]

You're not going to believe me, but I just sold 2.3 unisocks ($SOCKS) this week to purchase a house with attached retail downtown.

Average purchase price ~$150. Feel like I'm still leaving money on the table selling now but damn 2 pair of socks just bought me a house lel

[Anonymous No.30080244]

>>30079672
same

[Anonymous No.30080343]

>>30077585
I don’t believe you one bit.

[Anonymous No.30080404]

Tons of content gets made and used digitally without creators getting credit so it makes sense that they'd want something like this.

I wouldn't buy a jpeg nft to look at on PC, but if we invent sci-fi-esque ultra realistic hologram displays then I could buy some wild 3d render hologram sculpture and we might have something. Could have some sort of NFT network that uses a proof of reserve oracle to confirm ownership of the NFT. Artist could release a limited number of tokens on the network where the PoR oracle is required to execute a smart contract that allows for the file to be unencrypted/readable. If someone could whip up a new file type that requires consensus from the chain to display then we might have a situation where an artist can make something in a limited run without mass reproduceability.

Could have some Michaelangelo tier sculpture work if artists are no longer bound by realities constraints in creation and can be properly compensated for thier work by people who don't fear that the works value will be damaged by reproduction. People might jug the jpeg on the artists website, or take a picture of the thing in a gallery setting, but that wouldn't be the work at all.

Once unencrypted maybe someone could copy the file somehow,but what would the incentive be to pay gallery price for a unique work only to destroy the price though bootlegging and distribution?

[Anonymous No.30081326]

>>30080404
Instagram 100% is going to introduce nfts, possibly YouTube too. You’ll be able to see a preview of a video, photo but if you want the full thing, you need to pay. This will either completely revolutionize internet or go away as a fad. I think the former.

[Anonymous No.30081616]

>>30077784
tfw rare pepes can finally be a reality

[Anonymous No.30081817]

>>30081326
Yes I would not be surprised if Instagram took some sort of gallery positions with this stuff.

I think a premium content approach like you are speaking of is likely and will do wonders for OF girls if it allows mass viewing without leaks. But I think the big thing with NFTs is going to be limited access and exclusivity.

Seems like the pay for view model would have the tokens working as keys to access the content where as I feel NFTs will focus more on having the token be the content itself.

[jghfmjf No.30083280]

The only place to hold a RARE PEPE you niggers is here: https://pepetoken.finance/

Feels Bad ... Partner

[Anonymous No.30084169]

>>30077426
This meme was made here btw >>30019046

[Anonymous No.30084214]

>>30078977
That settles it. Anon owns the Mona Lisa and the one in France is a fake.

[Anonymous No.30084272]

rare /biz/ nft for 0.3 eth or whatever you wanna bid
own a piece of /biz/ history today
https://app.rarible.com/token/0x60f80121c31a0d46b5279700f9df786054aa5ee5:235738:0xc85105d1ef252b69377c06bc6b0381ca5037a174

[Anonymous No.30084375]

>>30078745
OMI you retard, everybody on /biz/ is lightyears behind crypto twitter holy fuck

[Anonymous No.30084417]

>>30078977
Thanks Anon, I'll print it out and display it in my toilet.

[Anonymous No.30084494]

>>30084375
Who do you recommend following on Twitter? ppl i can think of are the big names and ppl like flood and cryptocobain
feed me

[Anonymous No.30084573]

when will my cryptojak be worth 10 eth?

[Anonymous No.30084618]

>>30077815
does the NFT actually hold the entirety of the asset?
I don't understand. if it's a digital asset then yeah, you can degrade it but it's going to be authentic bit for bit no matter how many times you copy it.

[Anonymous No.30084924]

"art" NFTs are the most retarded thing to ever happen to crypto. Can we please stop talking about them?

[Anonymous No.30084947]

>>30084618
It’s yet another attempt to ducttape some IP controls into digital media. The only ways you can really extract money out of infinitely copiable bits are
> make it an always-online service that you control access to
> DMCA the fuck out of everybody
> hope people do the right thing and pay you for what you made
>>30081817
That control will really only work on the site it came from. At some point, the picture/video/whatever has to show up unencrypted on the user’s system (otherwise it’s useless), at which point we’re back to square one because he can just post it wherever

[Anonymous No.30085005]

>>30078977
Inspected and chortled

[Anonymous No.30085023]

>>30081326
you are stupid
>>30081817
you are stupid
>>30084947
thanks, someone with a brain

[Anonymous No.30085069]

>>30078745
It has nothing to do with art.

[Anonymous No.30085134]

Now this is art!

https://app.rarible.com/token/0x60f80121c31a0d46b5279700f9df786054aa5ee5:237118:0x326a19e2c9aa0c4c2b0d59eac67da0fc662894cb

[Anonymous No.30085172]

I make my own NFTs and none of them sell lel

I need to make more /biz/ themed ones

[Anonymous No.30085215]

>>30084947
You're an idiot. Copies are not as valuable as the original.

For example, some people playing animal crossing won't trade for an item if they believe it was hacked instead of obtained normally even though there's no functional difference.

Now extrapolate this to the VR future where you can tell if a digital item is legit because it's signed by the creator.

[Anonymous No.30085230]

>>30085134
it's beautiful, but gives me painful memories of not buying more back then

[Anonymous No.30085342]

>>30077426
>what's so special about atoms

[Anonymous No.30085344]

>>30078745
The killer app is money laundering

They cant do anything about it without admitting 90% of art sales are just money laundering

I'm worried about the people actually thinking that "owning" jpegs had value, though. Major top signal.

[Anonymous No.30085360]

>>30085215
all copies are not as valuable as the original to some.
all copies are as valuable as the original to me.

[Anonymous No.30085414]

>>30085344
Explain how Top Shot is money laundering

[Anonymous No.30085429]

>>30078977
Wtf I believe you now

[Anonymous No.30085464]

>>30085215
you're the idiot.
Yes they will trade for copies if they are way cheaper and with no functional difference as you just said. Unless you are a moralfag.

What kind of VR future? VR animal crossing or fucking an original NFT pornstar with full on sensitivity suit for my body and benis in the year 2050?

[Anonymous No.30085472]

>>30085215
>people playing animal crossing
You're now talking about a centralized system. Yeah no shit if you're buying a token that you want to use in centralized system you need to make sure central authority likes your token

[Anonymous No.30085507]

>>30085215
> you’re wrong, as proof I’ll show you some always-online service, even though that’s one of the ways you said people can make money online

[Anonymous No.30085789]

>>30085464
>>30085472
>>30085507
Are you all playing dumb? /biz/ is beyond saving holy fuck

[Anonymous No.30085886]

>>30085464
Why not 2025? The tech probably already exists.

[Anonymous No.30085927]

>>30085789
enjoy your pngs of marvel characters

[Anonymous No.30086020]

>>30077673
>sirs please order in the courts, my pnk needs to pump and I'm tired of seeing penis nfts being submitted everywhere

[Anonymous No.30086026]

>>30085927
enjoy being poor because you can't spot opportunities kek

[Anonymous No.30086081]

>>30085789
This entire thread has been shitposting about owning something because you have some faggy token.
It should be beyond obvious to anyone without serious brain damage that >>30078977 doesn’t actually own the Mona Lisa, but they can generate an NFT that says they do. Explain to me, in a manner that actually uses coherent math and logic, how you solve this issue

[Anonymous No.30086192]

>>30086081
>generate an NFT that says they do
All that NFT says is that you own the NFT. There's a png attached to it but feel free to ignore it

[Anonymous No.30086231]

>>30086026
spoon fed plz

[Anonymous No.30086257]

>>30078977
I'll give you these trips for it.

[Anonymous No.30086643]

>>30078977

[Anonymous No.30086886]

>>30077426
1000$ for lines!!! People are crazy
https://mintable.app/art/item/Lines--vibes-Abstract/hrIK1mrXDpR1lPi

[Anonymous No.30087043]

im retarded

[Anonymous No.30087090]

>>30086192
> There's a png attached to it but feel free to ignore it
Okay, so this is a confirmed brainlet technology. NFTs sound functionally identical to me writing “Anon owns this piece of paper” on a piece of paper and expecting someone to pay me for it. If it’s not, explain how

[Anonymous No.30087095]

>>30078977
kek

[Anonymous No.30087410]

>>30078977

[Anonymous No.30087432]

>>30085464
>VR animal crossing or fucking an original NFT pornstar
VR fucking an NFT animal crossing character. 2035. virtual waifu NFTs are 100 BTC a piece. enforced by kleros court.

[Anonymous No.30087465]

>>30077585
I made this Lisa

[Anonymous No.30087517]

>>30077426
NFTs are being promoted by Jews as a way to re-brand DRM in a way that makes it seem cool.
hard pass on ALL NFT-related projects.

[Anonymous No.30087562]

>>30077426
I put $1k into NBA Top Shot that is now worth over $6k. But they won't fucking let me withdraw, have to wait potentially weeks.

Also got into a soccer NFT thing called Sorare, seems much better. Both have gone up like mad though.

[Anonymous No.30087608]

>>30078977
Based mona lisa owner

[Anonymous No.30087668]

>>30077426
im not mentally retarded, so i haven't

[Anonymous No.30087671]

>>30087562
>i spent thousands of dollars on NFTs
>no no no - see, i made money because the numbers went up
>no, i can't actually take it out for 3 weeks

[Anonymous No.30087702]

>>30077426
OP why are sentinel threads always on top of /biz ?

[Anonymous No.30087919]

>tfw you just KNOW some asshole is going to make millions selling literal rare pepe NFTs and it's not going to be you

[Anonymous No.30087940]

>>30087671
They're the guys who made Crypto Kitties and have hundreds of millions of $ in investments, plus they own a crypto in the top 100 (flow).

I don't think it's a scam anon.

[Anonymous No.30087970]

>>30077426
NFTs were such a neat idea for video game items. Why the fuck did they turn into fucking certificates of art ownership? Two years ago I said to myself "One day there will be a mainstream use for NFTs". I never would have thought THIS out of all fucking things, would be it. Shame.

[Anonymous No.30088052]

I made an NFT and this is screaming all kinds of scam to me.

Rarible is one of the main NFT marketplaces, so I signed up there. Total fees to create an NFT with mutliple tokens/issues was about $60 in USD in ETH. It worked. Gave out a free token, found out that costs money also - about $6 for each transfer.

The next day everything appeared normal, but since I added a link to my Rarible marketplace on my site I accidentally found out that when I visit it when I'm not logged in, it says "this art or artist is blocked from public view."

Someone from Rarible had reviewed my art NFT that I had paid $60 for, and, finding it not to their liking, shadowbanned it along with my account from the marketplace. Of course an NFT that is blocked by its own issuer is completely useless.

Tldr Rarible is a huge scam.

[Anonymous No.30088103]

>>30078977
based

[Anonymous No.30088112]

>>30087940
i don't think it's a scam (although desu the weeks-wait to withdraw does sound scammy as fuck)
but regardless, whatever you bought is fundamentally worthless and only has "value" because of a retarded schizophrenic speculative bubble, which is basically guaranteed to pop.

so either way, you're going to lose thousands of dollars on some retarded series of ones-and-zeroes because you bought into that speculative bubble.

[Anonymous No.30088130]

>>30078977
Oh fuck he got it. He got the Mona Lisa.

[Anonymous No.30088201]

>>30088052
>finding it not to their liking
Was your art edgy or offensive?

[Anonymous No.30088227]

>>30088112
Nah, I'm sitting on $ balance after selling it all. It is the greater fool theory incarnate though, people spending thousands on a apehooper gif. At least Sorare has utility for a fantasy league where you can earn ETH.

[Anonymous No.30088231]

>>30084272
Not gonna lie but this is high shit posting art at its finest.

[Anonymous No.30088277]

>>30088201
It's a dolphin holding an AR while Marx smokes weed and some stuff.

[Anonymous No.30088361]

>>30078977
Oh wow, nice painting you own.

[Anonymous No.30088380]

>>30088277
I can see white power stuff getting taken down but that's weird. Sorry for your loss anon

[Anonymous No.30088389]

>>30088227
>Nah, I'm sitting on $ balance after selling it all.
after your mandatory weeks-long waiting time, naturally.

[Anonymous No.30088471]

>Sell NFTs to yourself. your friends for a lot of money
>make 4chan/reddit threads about how people are buying NFTs for 5,000$
>brainlets come buy your 100$ NFTs thinking that their price is extremely undervalued

Is this how NFTs are supposed to work? Or is it just money laundering

[Anonymous No.30088522]

>>30088471
>Or is it just money laundering
all art is money laundering

https://nypost.com/2019/12/05/this-120k-banana-is-just-one-of-the-ludicrous-things-for-sale-at-art-basel/

[Anonymous No.30088599]

>>30088380
I had to cash in my precious doge to get ETH for this experience. But I learned two valuable lessons: ETH is almost unusable due to insane gas fees, and Rarible is a scam company that's going to get sued to bankruptcy due to scam investigations or threat of such resulting in the loss of investor value.

[Anonymous No.30088666]

As always. The answer to the question "Do we live in a clown world" is of course "Yes, but how can I profit from this"

[Anonymous No.30088713]

>>30077606
Depends on what rights you buy. You could buy the copyrights and distribution rights and so on at the same time.

[Anonymous No.30088734]

>>30077784
I'm gonna make NFT's of Pepe's and make actually rare pepe images

[Anonymous No.30088744]

>>30088666
If Rarible shadowbans my dolphin holding an AR-15, your retarded item is definitely going bust

[Anonymous No.30088845]

>>30077606
No because NFTs aren't recognized by the government lmao
It's just a blockchain in which 1 person has happened to decide that it's worth alot, while everyone else decides it's worth nothing

[Anonymous No.30088860]

>>30077784
post rare pepes plz

[Anonymous No.30088956]

>>30088471
this is unironically a good idea. anyone want to make a nft shill dicord?

[Anonymous No.30088959]

>>30088744
Not mine hombre. Just browsing the site and came across it. Interested to hear more stories about people hocking random shit to idiots and calling it art.

[Anonymous No.30088961]

>>30077784

[Anonymous No.30089061]

>>30077426
Yessir my $TOSHI bags are loaded and I’ve got some gen 1 packs too

[Anonymous No.30089187]

>>30077426
I've been in the club where that photos taken, it's pretty shit and overpriced. I also have a mate who has a court order banning him from entering it

[Anonymous No.30089229]

>>30077426
There was literally an npr story on the radio today about NFTs, it was gay as hell

I’m sure if you google “npr nft” you could probably find it

[Anonymous No.30089656]

>>30077426
Money laundering business on the blockchain, just like most Art dealing

[Anonymous No.30089779]

Literally don't understand why people go crazy over collectibles

Especially collectibles with no intrinsic value aside from the crazy autist who decided to polp down $1000 for one

[Anonymous No.30089867]

>>30077426

Laughs in Handshake Top Level Domains

[Anonymous No.30089873]

>>30089229
see
>>30087517

[Anonymous No.30089894]

>>30089779
This gif sold for 140 Eth
I just got it for you guys for free

[Anonymous No.30089914]

https://hillbillydeluxe2020.medium.com/tokenization-spell-it-with-me-e-m-b-l-e-m-v-a-u-l-t-80d7e27c3c08

someone tell me im gay for having some coval

[Anonymous No.30090096]

>>30087517
>>30089873
That sounds bullish as fuck desu

[Anonymous No.30090108]

>what's the difference between owning Leonardo DiVinci's most famous painting and "owning" some shitty pixel art made by a soiboi?

[Anonymous No.30090203]

>>30090096
someone's going to make lots of money off it, yes.
but it almost certainly will not be you, or anyone else buying worthless hype-pumped-up tokens.

same reason you're not the one getting rich when some faggot sells a bullshit piece of abstract art for $10M

[Anonymous No.30090262]

>>30077784
bros if we don't make nft rare pepes a thing 4chan sux

[Anonymous No.30091324]

>>30078977
dangerously based

[Anonymous No.30091346]

>>30090262
Way ahead of you, rare pepes was one of the first nfts back in 2017

[Anonymous No.30091477]

>>30077426
Why can't you midwits understand? NFT has value ONLY as a content delivery mechanism. Do not buy shitty collector scams. It's a an airdrop publishing platform that prevents deplatforming. Fucking learn about what you are FUDding.

[Anonymous No.30091553]

>>30088380
Yikes. Anything in crypto that isn't completely decentralized and free from censorship deserves to die.

[Anonymous No.30091560]

>>30091477
do they have crowdfunding so it can function like patreon?

[Anonymous No.30091591]

>>30078977
Checked

[Anonymous No.30091672]

>>30077643
Unironically it will be huge. Think of shrelki’s personal Wu tang album

Sure some artists want to be famous. Others wanna be rich. If I was ZZ Top and I could make 5 million selling an album and royalties and shit years later or sell it to one fag for 10 million idk

[Anonymous No.30091717]

>>30084924
It's a real-world use case.

[Anonymous No.30091832]

I hate this nft craze. It’s the most normie tier retarded bullshit and is probably just more money laundering at its core. But people like in the OP deserve the gas chambers unironically

[Anonymous No.30091980]

>>30085414
>people dropping thousands on imaginary sportsball card
that's what I meant, retards like that being involved is a clear top signal

[Anonymous No.30092119]

>>30091672
how much would that album have been worth if anyone could listen to it for free?
not much, right?
the value came from the scarcity, which NFT art currently doesn't have. What's "scarce" are the unique tokens, which are valueless until associated with a unique asset that has real value.

[Anonymous No.30092426]

>>30077784
i can dilute the value of a few of my rare pepes; here you go bros, post sparingly

[Anonymous No.30092485]

>>30077784

[Anonymous No.30092497]

>>30092119
They solve the problem of all digital media being copyable. Not sure why this is so difficult for everyone to grasp.

[Anonymous No.30092518]

>>30077426
I need more captioned pictures of men sperging out to women on dates.

[Anonymous No.30092607]

[Anonymous No.30092625]

>>30092497
except the media is still copyable, genius
NFTs are tokens, not media. You don't own art, you own a token. Not sure how this is hard to grasp.

[Anonymous No.30092688]

>>30078977
Checked and keked

[Anonymous No.30092771]

>>30077673

[Anonymous No.30092930]

>>30092625
You don't get it, you'll be left behind old man.

To use your example, setting a cryptopunk you don't own as your avi is the equivalent of wearing an obviously fake rolex. It's tacky and everyone knows you're faking.

[Anonymous No.30092972]

>>30077784
pepe should not be bought or sold. You guys deserve death for what you're doing

[Anonymous No.30093031]

>>30092497
>cryptards unironically onioning out over fucking drm
>it wouldn't work anyway because the token has nothing to do with the media itself
You people are pathetic. What happened to this site?

[Anonymous No.30093093]

>>30092930
so the media is still copyable, but people might look at me funny unless I pay a million dollars for it?
sounds literally fake and gay

[Anonymous No.30093123]

>>30090262
see >>30092972
your mom will get cancer filthy faggot

[Anonymous No.30093167]

>>30093093
>>30093031
You can't pirate social status lmao.

[Anonymous No.30093195]

Yo I just saw this shit: https://earth2.io/
Some random company is letting you buy and bid on grids of a map of earth. I can see potential in NFT's as a way of monetizing creative output. But how on earth does this earth2 make money long term?

[Anonymous No.30093343]

>>30077426
Ok look I've been drinking southern comfort all night but hear me out.
The way we think of NFTs as being fugazi dogshit is exactly the way people thought about cryptocurrencies when they were new. And how people thought about utility tokens like eth when they were new. There people on this very board (or /g/) shilling btc but saying eth was useless and a scam back in the day.
Is it POSSIBLE that you're just a majority or laggard adopter and can't see the digitalization of the economy in its full scope? That all IP may soon be represented by a digitally signed token.
It actually makes a ton of sense to do this. Especially with how much valuable is created and distributed electronically. Think of how copyrights work and how much of a pain in the ass that is.
Now get this. You have a software and it's proprietary. You want to license it. Of course there are many ways to do this. But you can also have an NFT available for purchase that corresponds with your software. If you don't have that NFT you don't own the license and can't use it (legally anyways).
This actually makes a ton of sense >>30088845
Yet.

[Anonymous No.30093437]

>>30079672
That's 10/10 in bongland.

[Anonymous No.30093454]

>>30093167
so it's not about "ownership" of art (because you don't own the art) but rather the social status derived from owning a specific token on a blockchain?
and you think this is a convincing argument?

Also I just took a shit and realized if you could make infinite exact copies of Rolexes for free then no one would buy Rolexes, in fact the entire watch industry would probably collapse

[Anonymous No.30093460]

Imagine this right.
Photoshop. It's not free
You buy an NFT and it gives you access for a year or something. It allows you to authenticate your license of the software.
After the year you're blocked out and the access is basically encrypted with SHA256 or whatever we use now. Want back in? You need a fresh siggie from a new NFT token (license). Am I crazy?

[Anonymous No.30093534]

>>30077784

[Anonymous No.30093610]

>>30093454
Alright, you win anon. Please don't invest in any NFTs or coins that run their infrastructure because it will all collapse in the future.

It's probably just a fad like that bitcoin thing.

[Anonymous No.30093684]

>>30077426
You have to be retarded to not recognize the value of being able to track origin and confirm originality of digital art like we do with physical art, that's where physical art gets most its value.

[Anonymous No.30093696]

>>30081326
uh how is that different than just paying for content with a credit card

[Anonymous No.30093722]

I spent $14 and got one pack and the 5 that I have are worth like $1400 combined for some reason.

[Anonymous No.30093725]

>>30093343
>>30093343
>That all IP may soon be represented by a digitally signed token.
"But you can also have an NFT available for purchase that corresponds with your software
Ok, but the "art" tokens people are currently purchasing at infalted prices don't do any of that and never will
There's nothing to indiciate that you even own the IP of an artwork if you buy the associated NFT on Rarible or wherever
It's currently just a collective fantasy about the ability to own a JPEG

I agree that NFT technology has lots of potential, but the current "art" fad is a gay bubble

>>30093610
I didn't say anything about the infrastructure, the tech itself has obvious uses. But a token where someone is lying about it being a piece of art is not an "investment" it's just CryptoKitties 2021

[Anonymous No.30093748]

>>30092426
This is brilliant.

[Anonymous No.30093821]

>>30093167
>dude i gots so much social status cuz of my crypto punk token

[Anonymous No.30093827]

>>30093684
>You have to be retarded
Welcome to /biz/ enjoy your stay

It feels like talking to aging boomers about btc compared to crypto twitter.

[Anonymous No.30093866]

>>30077426
Nice !
Except that I can also make another NFT token from the same exact file.

[Anonymous No.30093868]

>>30093725
>I agree that NFT technology has lots of potential, but the current "art" fad is a gay bubble
this is the long and short of it. have fun with your gay bubble while it lasts. most of you are not gonna get lucky

[Anonymous No.30095308]

>>30092625
I get the collecting itch, I do. I get art, at least I think I do. But this crappy low-effort ms-paint NFT is just beyond retarded.

[Anonymous No.30095801]

The current NFT use cases are complete steaming poo. NFT is a massively powerful tool that the big brains haven’t yet figured out how to leverage. If I could figure it out, I’d be rich. But someone will be along shortly to revolutionize something or other. Like that lunatic who figured out how to use the internet for a book store...

[Anonymous No.30096532]

>>30095308
>But this crappy low-effort ms-paint NFT is just beyond retarded.
>be people
>be retard
anon you're betting against people being awful retarded faggots?
how does it feel to be so wrong?

[Anonymous No.30096613]

>>30093460
normie consumers would lose their tokens

[Anonymous No.30096752]

>>30077426
No, but a bought a shitcoin used to buy 3D super-hero NFTs. I'm up, but I can't help but shake-off the feeling that I might rope myself.

[Better Do Bitch No.30096834]

>>30077784
That's right mofo, you know whats up!

[Anonymous No.30097076]

>>30095308
>But this crappy low-effort ms-paint NFT is just beyond retarded
So buy the officially licensed stuff like the batman and ghostbusters figures.

[Anonymous No.30097411]

>>30096532
>>30097076
I did buy a small pile of OMI because I think it has potential, what with all the licenses and the viral material potential. I might even buy a digital figure for old times' sake. I'm more interested in the infrastructure NTFs, though. Still doing my research.

[Anonymous No.30097720]

>>30078977
Holy based mona lisa owner

[Anonymous No.30097934]

>>30097411
>virgin researcher
vs
>chad seat of his pants yolo'er
ngmi bro

[Anonymous No.30098677]

>>30077585
I made the Lisa Mona

[Anonymous No.30098703]

I made every Pepe.

[Anonymous No.30098771]

>>30077426
>bought some NFTs
which one?

[Anonymous No.30099537]

Why do normies go nuts over the mona lisa anyway? Unironically tell me right now without using artfag speech what makes the mona lisa any more special than every other portrait of a human ever. Fucking art niggers

[Anonymous No.30099734]

everyone check out my NFTs they are the most rarest and based painting on ethereum

https://opensea.io/accounts/new-rarities

[Anonymous No.30100116]

>>30077784
HOLY SHIT THATS RARE!!