/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.30349055]

So, besides having the Winklevoss freaks, Pantera Capital and a bunch of other heavyweight VCs as backers, what does this thing have going for it?

[Anonymous No.30349203]

good question op

[Anonymous No.30349242]

>>30349055
I've been asking myself the same thing. Seems all the hype behind it is not actually based on tech since it's a Tendermint clone with some beefed up privacy safeguards. Not exactly transformational, desu.

[Anonymous No.30349385]

>>30349242
>Not exactly transformational
But then again, 99% of cryptos below the top 50 really checks is. I'm still going to hold because I believe the VCs have enough clout and influence in the crypto space to push this thing into the top 100 at the very least.

[Anonymous No.30349723]

>>30349385
And you will probably be right. Buying on marketing alone is not a bad call since the underlying tech is not bad. It's just a matter of adoption. Plus CB listing seems like a definite thing in the future. I just don't think this is a moonshot.

[Anonymous No.30350089]

>>30349055
Get ready for an explosion of “women in crypto” and absolute media frenzy when the globohomo tribe selects its crypto-Hillary for the podium after she makes a public speech between 3/24-3/27
But yes, right now their institutional backing and partnerships are more significant than their tech in why people are bullish on it

[Anonymous No.30350142]

>>30349723
CB will undoubtedly happen after Gemini, we get two listing pumps at this rate — Kraken won’t do shit to the price and they’ll be the laggard of the bunch

[Anonymous No.30350354]

>>30349242
kek, the tendermint clone fud is funny. This really is starting to remind me of early LINK days. I'm going to be so fucking rich from this.

[Anonymous No.30350373]

>>30350089
That's part of the reason I'm so bullish on it. It might not be deserving of it, but it's being pushed to the forefront regardless. What other project below #150 would have their CEO giving talks next to Sergey and Vitalik?

[Anonymous No.30350517]

>>30350354
How is citing the project's own white paper fud?

[Anonymous No.30350625]

>>30350373
Anything IC3-adjacent is an instant buy. I fucked up on AVAX incredibly hard because I thought I had more time at $3.50. It feels like cheating when all you have to look for are the major academics and their working relationships in order to find the next moonshots. It blows my mind how poorly-read the average investor is in this market, where a bunch of NEET autists have better knowledge of fundamentals than 99% of the entire market.

[Anonymous No.30350634]

>>30350517
Because it's a consensus layer. It's a development choice like choosing to code in C++ vs. Python. It has literally nothing to do with what makes the protocol unique or the majority of the code infrastructure, it's just their consensus layer choice, and plenty of projects (including Binance's entire DEX) utilize it. Is Binance just a "Tendermint clone"? But I think you know this and you're just a based retard trying to aimlessly fud his own coin, and I appreciate that because this thing will explode, like LINK, whether we fud it to death or not.

[Anonymous No.30350767]

>>30350634
I am considering investing but I don't see the value yet. And yes, clone is an inartful word but what makes it unique in that case? I invested in DAGs early because they are an evolutionary next step in blockchain tech. What does Oasis have that makes it stand out relative to other L1s? Paratime just sounds like parachains by a different name. So what it comes down to is a race for adoption and other chains are further along.

[Anonymous No.30350924]

>>30350767
You’re willfully ignoring the kingmaker effect of VCs and their chosen wundercoins
XTZ and BNT have no right to be where they are at present, but look at whose logo appears out of fucking nowhere in Coinbase’s new ad blitz. This is not a pure market and you know tech is not the sole predictor of performance — if it were, ETH wouldn’t be in the position it is today. Not disagreeing with the validity of your concerns though, I fell for the TEE fud early on.

[Anonymous No.30351075]

>>30350767
I think you need to read more, there's a whole technical layer here that utilizes hardware and secure enclaves in ways that no other crypto project does outside of LINK -- and that isn't by coincidence, it's because the CEO literally designed the mechanisms that LINK uses. Just because two words have "para" in them doesn't mean they're the same. Also it's the first protocol which can securely tokenize infinite sets of data in whatever number of ways you want to splice them. There are no other blockchain projects with the tech that Oasis has built, not even close. It will be the leader in blockchain data privacy. If you don't think data privacy is important, then sure, but otherwise this is the project that enables blockchain to be useful across a magnitude of more use cases where enterprise adoption have been sheepish, while simultaneously protecting consumers & the general population. It will also empower DeFi to do so much more. And on top of all that they're smart enough to build interoperability protocols that will allow any L1 to take advantage of their services - and every L1 will. Shit, any dapp on ETH could use them JUST as an L2 solution right now and that's not even factoring in any of the added benefit outside of reducing gas costs 99% which isn't even the main benefit intention of the protocol.

I really can't stress enough that this of ALL the seemingly shady looking pieces of shit on /biz/ is actually the next LINK. And I was in LINK at ICO, and still hold. And my stack is fat.

[Anonymous No.30351186]

>>30351075
The kicker is that most of the strongest research on this one came from the LIINK=LINK threads around October when everyone was voraciously reading through everything related to CanDiD and DECO
I don’t think I saw it mentioned until the JPM mass-psychosis happened

[Anonymous No.30351248]

>>30351075
>>30350924
Ok. I appreciate your answers. I'm genuinely asking in good faith. I'm not as technically informed as I should be. Will do more reading. In the meantime, I'm dong fucking KYC on gate.io so I can buy this shit. Also looking at a L0 like Marlin (POND) so if you have thoughts on that...

[Anonymous No.30351354]

>>30351248
>fellow burger
Use KuCoin but deposit USDT, you get to skip KYC and their base rate fees are only 0.1
I don’t trust them as far as I can throw them, but it was a ridiculously quick setup

[Anonymous No.30351392]

>>30351075
Here I was thinking this was just a piece of vaporware shit being hyped by powerful backers. Going to do a lot more research and consider increasing my position.

[Anonymous No.30351663]

>>30351186
>>30351186
Yea I mean, the smallest favor you can do yourself in this space is follow the people. If you can't understand tech, then just look at who is involved. If you're seeing one of the geniuses at the forefront of creating usefulness in the crypto space, who has authored some of the most noted papers in developing crypto, and she starts her own blockchain and that blockchain has a token.... do you even need more than that? I don't get how anyone can refute that between that and the fact that she instantly raised $45,000,000 from reputable investors, more than any other crypto project to date, that this isn't one of the most legitimate projects in the space and is way undervalued currently. And that's without looking at what they're actually working towards. Once you do that it becomes a no brainer.

>>30351248
Just remember this isn't a "in 10 days it'll 10x" moonshot PnD piece of shit. It's a long term hold. I promise if you buy now and hold by the end of the year you will see the light. But this is in reality a multi-year hold. With staking gains still at 15% it's a great time to stack.

[Anonymous No.30351833]

>>30351354
Good looks. Somewhere in Korea there is a man trying to determine if my mug is the same as the one on my driver's license and it gives me the damn creeps.
>>30351663
Yeah, I'm not in this for moonboy gains. Gonna stake and forget.

[Anonymous No.30352007]

>>30350924
You need to go back and figure out why you are wrong about bnt

[Anonymous No.30352046]

>>30351075
Thank you for the writeup. I've been researching both this as well as hbar as a potential long term hold. What are your thoughts on these two? Is your preference solely with oasis?

[Anonymous No.30352247]

>>30351663
how much time do we have to pack our bags? im poor, but i've been buying some every paycheck since december. thank god it looks like they prefer to keep it down with announcements and marketing

[Anonymous No.30352666]

this coin is gonna be so great in a couple of years and by the end of this year it will have managed a good organic rise up probably to the 80 cent to 1 dollar mark

[Anonymous No.30353757]

>>30352007
Wanna know how I know you arrived on /biz/ after 2018?

[Anonymous No.30354648]

>>30351075
Fuck anon, this is the first good comment I've seen here in the last 3 months. I was completely ignoring Oasis but you've piqued my interest. Thank god some 2017 fags are still around

[Anonymous No.30354705]

Why is Dawn Song such a big deal?

[Anonymous No.30354903]

>>30354705

[Anonymous No.30355050]

How much coin been pumping when listed Gemini? They will offer staking too. As well as Coinbase.

[Anonymous No.30355192]

>>30354705
Check her h-index. She was also one of the few that gave a keynote speech during smartcon and they've been delivering, now having both their own mainnet, and also able to run oasis on the ethereum network.

[Anonymous No.30355251]

>>30353757
Care to elaborate? I know about Bancor's history but I gave them the benefit of the doubt and I can't say I'm unhappy.

[Anonymous No.30355434]

My 2 largest holdings are BNT and ROSE. Albeit mainly bnt. I’m feeling pretty optimistic

[Anonymous No.30355457]

Feel free to join the unofficial rose discord server, anons. 4QYsDAKhsT

[Anonymous No.30355536]

[Anonymous No.30355614]

>>30351075
Interesting, thanks for sharing anon. I've heard that many other OG linkies are into ROSE as well through the Cornell connections but never looked into it much.

[Anonymous No.30355629]

>>30355457
Thanks
>>30355536
English rose. Literally tbf

[Anonymous No.30355681]

>>30355614
You've heard right.

[Anonymous No.30355727]

To anyone wondering; suicide stack 10k, make it stack 100k

[Anonymous No.30355813]

>>30355536
Bourbon Rose reporting in, soon to be Noisette Rose. I'm an OG linkmarine btw, bought link back in 2017. Literally every OG linkmarine I know are buying this or are interested in it, dyor anons.

[Anonymous No.30355831]

>>30351075
based

[Anonymous No.30355936]

>>30355727
if you could only pick 1 for a make it stack; rose or hbar?

[Anonymous No.30356099]

>>30355936

rose, and I already have my make it stack.

[Anonymous No.30356168]

>>30355457
uhh.. dont you guys have telegram? discord is for trannies

[Anonymous No.30356222]

guys you are supposed to fud... I need more time

[Anonymous No.30356227]

>>30356168
The Rose telegram is terrible, only normies and moonboys. I highly recommend the unofficial rose discord even though i hate discord trannies. Lots of smart people and good discussions there.