.....

[Anonymous No.4408524]

.............

[Anonymous No.4408538]

Yeah fuck all of you for this. You broke my family.

[Anonymous No.4408557]

>>4408538
Lol

[Anonymous No.4408660]

.......

[Anonymous No.4408755]

What the fuck is going on here?

[Anonymous No.4408758]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.4408772]

What the fuck Happening?

[Anonymous No.4408773]

...40 cents... I paid..40 cen.......

[Anonymous No.4408790]

IT'S GOING UP

[Anonymous No.4408791]

>>4408772
exit scam

[Anonymous No.4408809]

Will it go back up after this shitty bitcoin fork? That's why everything went down.

[Anonymous No.4408817]

>>4408524
It's on sale

[Anonymous No.4408845]

>>4408790

I hope you realized that's because BTC is going down.

[Anonymous No.4409056]

still holding, dont give up linkmarines, we are facing a little bit of turbulence before we arrive at the drop zone

[Anonymous No.4409241]

MOMMY

[Anonymous No.4409279]

>>4409056
still holding, not selling for a long time.

but this price is disheartening and brings out the fud in me, lately.

[Anonymous No.4409423]

>>4408817
Black Friday sale bois.

[Anonymous No.4409449]

>>4408538
>>4408773

[Anonymous No.4410575]

>>4408524
TIME TO BUY MORE

[Anonymous No.4410609]

Get all link u can get dis going big boys

[Anonymous No.4410671]

>/biz/ shills link, "hodl till 2019 for x50 and 2020 for x100"
>one week later
>"it fell, I thought it was supposed to moon, AAAAAAAA"
Wow not one week later it's 2019, that's pretty fast! I didn't even notice!

[Anonymous No.4410681]

>mfw I bought at 52k yesterday
>it's 47k now
why does this always happen to meeeee

[Anonymous No.4410712]

Hi Linkmarines! Newbie here!!

Can you tell me how LINK solves the noose problem?

[Anonymous No.4410765]

Be real with me fags, IF sergeys shit actually works as he promises, and it works pefectly and can be easily adapted by other cryptos/business. Again, assuming its actually works. How high does this go

[Anonymous No.4410774]

>>4410712
A chain is less likely to snap than a rope

[Anonymous No.4410783]

>>4410765
Ripple MarketCap high

[Anonymous No.4410785]

Shuddup u pussies
You have been warned this is a long-term game, so stop whining.
I wish I had the money to average down at this dip

[Anonymous No.4410802]

>>4408538
Dude learn to have some restraint, don't go all in or bet money you can't lose. Sorry about your family.

[Anonymous No.4410804]

>>4410765
about 10-20$ in less than a week once everyone finds out

[Anonymous No.4410810]

>>4410765
>>4410783
No. There is no middle ground for this one. Its either moon or nothing

[Anonymous No.4410811]

>>4410765
if in december swift makes an official announcement in which they suck link's cock and in february the network is launched and confido and all the other things start using link then this shit goes above ripple, which would mean it's sitting at $28

[Anonymous No.4410817]

>>4410765
I think we should be seeing something like Ripple's marketcap, which is $9billion. LINK has a marketcap of $55, so we should be seeing $32 LINK if we match Ripple's marketcap. But I didn't consider the fact that we have a circulating supply of 350k and Ripple has a circulating supply of 39 billion, so I think all of us LINKies take the first manned moon mission to Andromeda Galaxy. Just think about it for a second, we will eventaully be in the multi-billion dollar market cap anyways. LINK is still at its infancy, so you better accumulate right now at a $55m market cap, before we take off.

[Anonymous No.4410860]

>>4410671
it's almost like there is more than one person that holds this, crazy stuff!

>>4410774
it's actually the other way around, buddy...chainlink might be stronger than rope, but you can't notice metal fatigue until it's too late. a single point of failure makes the whole chain useless. rope however is made out of tons of individual fibers, the chance that all of them break at once is highly unlikely.

[Anonymous No.4410862]

>>4410671
thank you.

[Anonymous No.4410899]

>>4408524
> op delete this im quietly filling my bags

[Anonymous No.4410921]

LINK is dead you idiots
move on

[Anonymous No.4410926]

Just bought 1250 more.

[Anonymous No.4410937]

>>4410860
Are you really so fat that you're going to fatigue a chain while hanging yourself?

[Anonymous No.4410938]

>>4410860
>a single point of failure makes the whole chain useless
Ask yourself: what is decentralization and how does it apply to Chainlink?

[Anonymous No.4411003]

> b b b but muh oracles
so glad i dumped this shit at .32 cents for quite a loss, but if if had held on till now i would be thinking about putting a glock in my mouth

[Anonymous No.4411019]

>>4411003
What did you buy instead?

[Anonymous No.4411035]

>>4410937
just saying it's smarter to hang yourself with a rope than a chain. you can easily see that a rope is shitty, but you can't see that a chain is going to break any moment. if you're going to kill yourself you should do it right, you know? otherwise you might get second thoughts are something crazy. or you break your cervical spine and end up as a drooling quadriplegic. instead of the sweet release of death you get to experience living hell for the rest of your pathetic life.

[Anonymous No.4411052]

1) Oraclize
2) Ethereum Oracle service
3) Coin not needed
4) you can't even decentralize a centralized data source in many cases

But don't worry guys LINK will moon!!!

[Anonymous No.4411053]

link is done.

created by a fat fraud. already made millions of it and is now banging trannies in sea.

wait till fat sergey dumps his 300 million links.
my prediction one link = 0.0001 cents.

[Anonymous No.4411058]

>tfw when you fell for a well orchestrated PnD groups bullshit ERC token.

Give it a rest guys, it’s over. We fucked up. Hard

[Anonymous No.4411062]

>>4411003
>Buy high, sell low
Classic.
I will lmao when LINK is 20$ a pop

[Anonymous No.4411067]

>>4411052
>>4411053
>>4411058
Welp, looks like it's time to buy some more Link I guess.

[Anonymous No.4411082]

>>4411019
half to BTC, half to LTC

[Anonymous No.4411095]

>>4411062

LINK will be verge tier soon.
ITS OVER.
just fucking get out and move on you greedy faggots.
You made a mistake. Oh well. Shit happens.
Get. The. Fuck. Up. SON. GET UP.
It's not the end of the world. START OVER and do it right next time.
RESEARCH.

>well it may be over for you.
If its not GET UP AND GO NIGS

We get it. You fell for a meme. Laugh about it years later. Move on. Now. Or lose everything.

[Anonymous No.4411102]

And finally i have 20k link. Im in 10% loss overall in btc and 350usd profit in fiat tho...

Will i make it?

[Anonymous No.4411106]

i posted this graph in alot of link threads, yet you deluded linkies kept calling me a fudding piece of shit

hodling is not a meme, but it only applies to very few cryptos like bitcoin and ethereum

not literal garbage vaporware erc-20 tokens like chainlink

[Anonymous No.4411123]

>>4411106
That looks nothing like Link's price chart.

Link spent three weeks in the low 40c range, while d0x simply spiked and fell.

And let's not get into comparing the use cases here lmao.

[Anonymous No.4411128]

>>4411106

fucking this.

Well I'm done trying to save you /biz/ bros.
I'm going back to hyping your doom and telling you to buy more.

[Anonymous No.4411138]

>>4411123
deluded linkie

they have the same use case, as in they have no use at all and is literal vaporware only used to raise eth

[Anonymous No.4411145]

>>4410811

Why you guys are sure that SWIFT will announce it ?

[Anonymous No.4411155]

>>4411138
>they have no use at all

[Anonymous No.4411158]

I'm just holding, because this is my Link story:
>buy 30 eth @ $10 a couple years ago
>sell it all @ $300 a couple months ago to put it all in on link
>$300 was worth $9000 but is now worth $3000
>comfy with my 20,000+ link and not selling until they're worth at least $100
Seriously, even *if* it went to zero and got delisted, I'm only out $300 at worst (which is what a fun weekend or an ounce of incredibly good pot costs). I'm not selling. That initial $300 stake is going to be worth $30,000 next year and about $3,000,000.00 next decade. I still have a few months worth of rent & food money tucked away, two (soon to be one -- I'm selling the other) functional (older) cars, the ability to earn money, and relative comfort.

...did you guys really gamble your entire life savings on this? How will you feed & shelter yourself through the long, cold winter before the moon mission?

>hold fast

[Anonymous No.4411180]

>>4410817
Keep it going anon, you make me feel better

[Anonymous No.4411188]

why are you all so confident that an erc20 shit coin will have a 20b market evaluation lol

[Anonymous No.4411195]

>>4411188
>why are you all so confident a piece of cotton paper will have trillions in market valuation lol

[Anonymous No.4411211]

>>4411158
I personally put about a fifth of my savings into Crypto and multiplied before Link was a thing and then went all in on Link.

It sucks to lose so much of my crypto gains but I'm still 4X my initial.

[Anonymous No.4411217]

All this hard FUD here really makes me think...

Always do the opposite what /fit/ says and I was always fine

[Anonymous No.4411219]

>>4411155
supercomputers anon
SUPERCOMPUTERS

[Anonymous No.4411223]

>>4411188
Have you ever looked at the purpose of the XRP token? It literally hasn't got anything, yet people buy it in great quantities because ripple is doing so well.
XRP is not needed for ripple transactions, it's basically a fucking coupon, and an extremely tiny portion gets burned whenever there's a transaction.

[Anonymous No.4411227]

>>4411217
So you're saying I shouldn't eat my sperm?

[Anonymous No.4411235]

>>4411227

Thats now how it works. Get an Overview of the whole /biz/ mentality of a coin

[Anonymous No.4411270]

Can't be fucked to read this whole shit show but SWIFT officially said that they would announce whether they are using Chainlink in early December or if they had found a cheaper option. Good luck.

[Anonymous No.4411291]

>>4411062
stay poor gaycuck
i bought it without doing any research
once i did my research i got out

You will be lucky if it ever get close to $1, its never going to reach $20

At todays prices it has
marketcap $55,001,100 with 350million coins in circulation = $0.157 per coin

even if it goes x20 from here, it will have a market cap of
55MM x 20 = $1100000000

Sergei release the remaining tokens and you have


You new price will be (market cap /supply)
$1100000000 / 1billion = $1.1

Thats asssuming Sergei doesnt start dumping his bags everytime he gets an erection and needs more coin for trannies.

[Anonymous No.4411308]

>>4411270
Wrong, the December announcement was about whether they were going to use Hyperledger Fabric specifically for their GPI project, or decide to look at other (blockchain) options.

Link pretty much has nothing to do with this.

[Anonymous No.4411318]

>>4410817
>Buy my bags

[Anonymous No.4411321]

>>4411270
why would they use this shit when they can just fork from their github and hire half a dozen devs to do their work.
who would trust this useless Sergei and his halfwit sidekick Rory to do work for a mulibillion dollar industry.

Face it Sergei is sitting on his new yacht getting his dick sucked, hes never coming back.

[Anonymous No.4411327]

>>4411145

anons?

[Anonymous No.4411328]

>>4411308
I stand corrected. They way I read it was that it was the CL related blockchain project.

[Anonymous No.4411338]

#4CHNallday

[Anonymous No.4411363]

>>4411235
what if biz largely ignores my coin, am i good?

[Anonymous No.4411377]

>>4411291
The remaining tokens aren't going to just be dumped onto the market, do more research.
They're going to be distributed to nodes as they join the network.
By the time all 1B tokens are out in the wild, that means the network has expanded greatly. And guess what market cap a mainstream smart contract solution would have.

[Anonymous No.4411381]

>>4411363
yes

[Anonymous No.4411393]

>>4411328
There's been some confusion on /biz/ about the whole GPI thing for a while.

Just know that GPI is a cross-border payments project, currently Swift's main flagship project, and that it takes a full day to complete transactions while blockchain alternatives (e.g. IBM with Lumens) are virtually instant.
There is little doubt they're going to end up using some form of blockchain tech for GPI; but again it is almost entirely unrelated to Link.

[Anonymous No.4411428]

>>4411393
So LINK is going to be used for payment of oracles, right? Is that tech not in demand yet?

[Anonymous No.4411476]

>>4411428
They're developing the oracle node network right now.
Still a tremendous amount of work to be done, hence why they needed the money.
Chainlink network v1.0 was ready as a testnet before the presale, but the plan is a decentralized network, so it won't be a "finished product" until it is in mainstream use as intended.
A centralized network would be a lot easier to implement, but then it wouldn't be fit for purpose.

[Anonymous No.4411508]

>>4411476
From what Rory said they dont want to announce anything until the network is up and running. If it's that far away from an announcement I guess we are fucked price-wise.

[Anonymous No.4411539]

>>4411476
I wonder how long it will take...2 months? a year? five years? the longer we have to wait, the more likely it is this was a waste of our money.

[Anonymous No.4411542]

>>4411508
all that's telling me is to find something to get money to get a dedicated PC for a node

[Anonymous No.4411551]

>>4411539
Yup it'll take 10 years. Sell now

[Anonymous No.4411554]

>>4411508
>>4411539
They could release the initial version of the working node network any day now, really.
The point I was making has to do with the fact that the network is decentralized, it's not self-contained. It is made up of a vast amount of external nodes that have to join the network on their own.
The infrastructure for this will probably be released soon, but even after that development will have to continue at full whack.

[Anonymous No.4411568]

Can I explain why you guys are retarded?
If you actually did any research, it's obvious how this was going to fail.
The only reason most of you imbeciles bought it was because it was shilled hard on here by those that ultimately dumped on you.

How does it feel to be played hard?

[Anonymous No.4411573]

>>4408845
QUICK, JUMP SHIP

[Anonymous No.4411579]

>>4411554

[Anonymous No.4411590]

>>4408538
Damn sure youll be saying that when link hits cripple's market cap.

[Anonymous No.4411602]

>>4411579
Yup. And the main net release will probably be sooner rather than later.
Sergey said a fully mature API node library is about two years away, and since this library an only begin to grow AFTER the main net release, this release will have to come pretty soon now.

[Anonymous No.4411603]

>>4411568
Is that why none of the top 50 addresses have dumped and some even accumulated more, mr. retard

[Anonymous No.4411608]

>>4411568
>If you actually did any research, it's obvious how this was going to fail.

it's actually the opposite, why are you spreading such low effort fud?

[Anonymous No.4411622]

like vitalik said link isnt worth 32ml, hes been proven right! DUMMMMMMP

[Anonymous No.4411634]

>>4411622
>Vitalik

[Anonymous No.4411638]

>>4411622

>There is a product that makes mine obsolete
>HURR DURR IT ISUNT WURTH 32 MILLIÄNZ DOLLAZ

Why even listen to pedos

[Anonymous No.4411644]

>>4411622
>>4411634
Let's not listen to whatever Vitalik says for a while.

[Anonymous No.4411646]

>>4411579
pls no moms spaghetti

[Anonymous No.4411650]

>>4411622
>Vitalik
>good at pricing things
he said Ethereum isn't worth anywhere near its at. He's bad at valuing things

[Anonymous No.4411651]

>>4411158

>pothead is a retard

Glad you lost all your money.

[Anonymous No.4411670]

>>4411622
SELL YOUR NEO!!
AGUHHHH
HEHEHEHE
PFFFFFFFFBLLFFF

[Anonymous No.4411703]

>>4411095
tfw bittrex saved me from being a stinky linky by not listing it

[Anonymous No.4411707]

>>4411568
oh yeah thanks for using all your research in your well constructed argument RETARD.

[Anonymous No.4411741]

I'M TAKING THESE 100K LINKS TO MY GRAVE. GET RICH OR DIE TRYING.

[Anonymous No.4411755]

>>4411551
for me its ok

[Anonymous No.4411770]

>>4408809
the bitcoin fork was canceled you dumbass

[Anonymous No.4411781]

>>4411770
you can't cancel network events faggot. The network decides what is canceled and what not. Not 5 rich dudes. Fucking understand decentralization.

[Anonymous No.4411788]

>>4411781
so the suspected altcoin boom is still on?
or are we just gonna see everything bleed mmore and more?

[Anonymous No.4411792]

>>4411102
Youll meme bro, made a pretty penny on BCH and bought 27klink. Have 4 eth, racked and ready to be shot into link. FEELING COMFI FEST, THIS IS THE GREATEST THI G BIZ COULD OF GIVEN ME, THANkYOU GUYS,.

[Anonymous No.4411839]

>>4411579

Lol the same ole "Yea guys thanks for the cash you cuc...I mean investors. we're working on X right now once thats settled Y and Z should be easy. Keep accumulating and holding while I get blowjobs on my new yacht. Working real hard guys thanks."

Deluded linkies. Whoever is still holding this thrash deserves to loose money.

[Anonymous No.4411916]

>>4411839
I doubt Rory got any of th 32m

[Anonymous No.4411929]

I'm just happy that new buyers get a chance to buy it cheap.

I want everyone to have that chance. Because once nodes are operational, they'll have no excuse for not having bought it.

[Anonymous No.4411959]

>>4411638
uh I don't think you understand what either ETH or LINK actually do. LINK is hardly revolutionary, it's more like a bandage for ETH. It's an Ethereum-based token for crying out loud.

[Anonymous No.4411966]

>>4411916
explain. I genuinely want to know cause I know someone who got funded 1 mil for an ico but I wonder how much he and his partner actually get from it.

[Anonymous No.4411967]

>>4411839
>Our product is not up and running 100%
>Lets shill it as a working product anyway as the retards on /biz/ want that sweet $0.25

[Anonymous No.4411974]

>>4411966
rory's just some shmuck that admins the slack channel

[Anonymous No.4411981]

>>4411959
It makes no difference what kind of token it is. LINK is simply used as payment for node operators. Chain Link is block chain agnostic. You can go make a BTC Chain Link right this minute.

[Anonymous No.4411987]

>>4411929
>once nodes are operational
doesn't EVEN HAVE NODES AAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHA

[Anonymous No.4412005]

Reminder that all the link haters in this thread are poor as fuck.

[Anonymous No.4412065]

>>4411981
Hardly revolutionary. ~$0.20-ish seems about right. Perfect home for LINK.

[Anonymous No.4412079]

>>4411981
>You can go make a BTC Chain Link right this minute.

yeah so go do it
oh wait chainlink has been being developed for 3 years

hmmmm maybe thats the reason why it will be successful?

[Anonymous No.4412088]

>>4408524
Congrats on this. Seriously

[Anonymous No.4412089]

>>4412079
https://create.smartcontract.com/#/choose

[Anonymous No.4412115]

>>4412065
How far into your ass did you have to dig to get that number?

[Anonymous No.4412185]

jeez guys link is already very very low you don't need to make any more FUD, just buy now

[Anonymous No.4412213]

>>4412115
all the way into the intestines, where valuable building blocks get turned into - SHIT.

[Anonymous No.4412219]

Just sell lol

[Anonymous No.4412224]

You guys are idiots. https://pastebin.com/6xcsc2jR

[Anonymous No.4412292]

>>4412224
delet this please

[Anonymous No.4412306]

>>4411270
Where did this info come from?

[Anonymous No.4412388]

>>4411052
> you can't even decentralize a centralized data source
I tired of repeating: even if a source is centralised a company would need a data provider to read that data.
That is why having many nodes with the same data sources is actually good.
The idea of believing what you see is intuitive to you but not computers. A computer has no way to see if a data source looks fishy or a data provider is surely a fraud.
Computers can define truth only as a consensus opininon. If you need a consensus about, say, temperature in Paris, you need lots of ppl living in Paris to tell you what it actually is.
Seriously, go read Wittgenstein. LINK makes perfect sense once you read that mofo

> but what if node operators provide malicious data?
Then they lose their LINK or even get prosecuted.
Also, Sergey is doing his best to construct a trustless network. That is what oracle problem is.

> but fraud at source level puts honest node operators at risk
That's another part of oracle problem and it is already solved. An operator can prove he is not altering his input. Then all accusations go to the data generator.

> but Ethereum
They have plenty of other problems.
Go check their roadmap and such. RN security of existing system is their priority. They have no time to do oracles.

> Coin not needed
RN it isn't but it will be a measure of trust to a node and a payment method.

Can anyone point out any faults in my argument?
Still holding LINK. If you sell now, make sure you have a clear idea what you wanna do with ur money

[Anonymous No.4412390]

>>4408772

Literally bancor 2.0. Enjoy your dead coin.

[Anonymous No.4412402]

>>4412115
Nowhere, I just looked at the market sentiment. You're not smarter than the market. Now please explain where your delusional price predictions come from.

[Anonymous No.4412426]

>>4412224
please remove

[Anonymous No.4412457]

>>4412224
delet

[Anonymous No.4412473]

>>4412402
I never predicted a price. It's impossible to do so.

But if you think it's going to stay at the current price when companies actually start using it, you are delusional. Right now it's all just speculation.

[Anonymous No.4412475]

>>4412224
Remove it. Its fake

[Anonymous No.4412486]

>>4412224
Thanks, unironically just bought 100k

[Anonymous No.4412525]

>>4411638
Even worse, LINKmakes Vs project actually useful. He's just pissy about it

[Anonymous No.4412602]

I'm pretty sure I can part ways with my investment in LINK if it doesn't work out. However, the same sentiment does not apply if I pulled out and missed out on a potential top 5 coin in 2018.

[Anonymous No.4412606]

>>4410765
10b+ market cap. Not even memeing dude.

[Anonymous No.4412617]

1 quadrillion market cap in 5 seconds lads
GET IN NOW

[Anonymous No.4412658]

>>4412617
thanks just bought 100k

[Anonymous No.4412671]

does anyone have a resolution image of the chainlink logo

[Anonymous No.4412683]

>>4412671

[Anonymous No.4412693]

>>4412683

[Anonymous No.4412700]

>>4412224
so basically you have to hold until we live in the future?

[Anonymous No.4412727]

Post a fat Sergei pic. I need it for an art project.

[Anonymous No.4412729]

>>4412700
I think you might have learnt the meaning of the word investment

[Anonymous No.4412733]

So good I got a soon to shoot REQ to cover my LINK losses

[Anonymous No.4412786]

>>4412224

[Anonymous No.4412794]

[Anonymous No.4412804]

dev team went on holiday after the ICO

a
n
d

they never came back

[Anonymous No.4412850]

Sergei will not abandon this project.
It's not about money it's about vision.
BUY NOW while it's still low.
You don't want to have to be a wageslave yoru whole life do you?
LINKIES HODL
remember we have MEME magic
THERE IS NOTHING THAT CAN STOP THIS
meme magic elected Trump
now its meme magics turn to make YOU rich.
YOU decide NOW.

[Anonymous No.4412879]

>>4412850
I got 2.2k LINK coins, am I gonna make it breh?

[Anonymous No.4412888]

>>4412729
BUT I WANT MONEY NOW

[Anonymous No.4412903]

>>4408524
Every time /biz/ shills something it crashes and burnes.
I eth and mon are next big things here right now. Guess you know now what to do if you hold them?

[Anonymous No.4412926]

>>4412879

will you consider $440,000 making it?
this is the most real project

[Anonymous No.4412936]

>>4412879
yes just hodl

[Anonymous No.4412950]

>>4412224
isn't it a bit ambitious for 2 man team?

[Anonymous No.4412996]

>>4412950
there's a lot of very successful companies that started with 2 people. I don't let things like that deter me from noticing the value of the service they plan on providing. Hiring great people is easy when you have a product that everyone knows could be something massive.

[Anonymous No.4412999]

>>4408772
lol the fud is real, bitcoin is near ATH, shitcoins are depressed, once bitcoin corrects shitcoins will recover, stop being retards

[Anonymous No.4413017]

>>4410899
checked

[Anonymous No.4413032]

>>4411082
incoming ltc and btc crash all, anon bought in

[Anonymous No.4413076]

>>4412950
> isn't it a bit ambitious for 2 man team?
> Google

The absolute state of /biz/

[Anonymous No.4413106]

>>4412224
>already up 4x from ICO
I'm not particularly well informed but all I hear are people lamenting their losses after having bought at or near ICO price.

Is this just outdated, or is it plain wrong?

[Anonymous No.4413132]

>>4411145

I'm not sure why they're throwing that December date around, but that SWIFT will work with LINK in some capacity seems quite high.

[Anonymous No.4413135]

My following question is not FUD:

Sergey's previous project was an utter failure. Even if I find value on chainlink, shouldn't we judge the chances of this project's success on Sergey's track record?

What if the problem this faggot is trying to address is legitimate, but he is the wrong person to do it?

[Anonymous No.4413142]

[Anonymous No.4413147]

>>4413076
google seems less ambitious than this, this is "yeah everyone will totally use our shit to power everything in da blockchain future and not some other shit" level of ambitions. going all in on something like this doesn't seem very smart.

[Anonymous No.4413165]

Bought some more at 16 cents, in hindsight I could have gotten it cheaper but whatever. Thanks for the discount, Pajeet.

[Anonymous No.4413168]

>>4411381
REX master race

[Anonymous No.4413190]

>>4413135
whatever project you're referring to (I bet you can't even name it) was not "his". he merely worked on it a little bit. LINK is entirely his baby after he recognized the truly great problem there was to solve.

[Anonymous No.4413198]

>>4413147
pussy money don't make no money. stay home pajeet. i hope your 0.3 BTC makes you rich.

[Anonymous No.4413216]

>>4412950

Apple was a 2 man team

[Anonymous No.4413241]

>>4413216
yup. and personal computers in every home was seen as a very, VERY radical and stupid idea at the time

[Anonymous No.4413280]

Over 9000 hours in paint.

[Anonymous No.4413282]

>>4410765
I wonder if they blasted cold air on her tits when they filmed that.

[Anonymous No.4413332]

>>4413106

ICO is still up, but many on /biz/ bought in the 30s and 40s so are down.

[Anonymous No.4413334]

......

[Anonymous No.4414243]

>>4411095
How much are you trying to buy right now, anon?

[Anonymous No.4414341]

>>4413280
at least crop the cube fuck dude lazy as fuck. -100 meme points for laziness, -100 for faggot little girl anime shit.

[Anonymous No.4415012]

>>4411270
>wake up one day
>SWIFT ANNOUNCES THEY WILL NOT BE USING CHAINLINK
>every single thread on /biz/ is LOL LINKIES BTFO
>mfw

[Anonymous No.4415281]

So guys, I’m trying to accumulate, but I’m paranoid that some crazy news will come out of nowhere and LINK will shoot up to $1 within hours. This led to me buying up a bunch of LINK now, but is limiting my accumulation potential. What do you think the odds are of some crazy announcement or leak happening before the end of the year?

[Anonymous No.4415327]

>>4412850

[Anonymous No.4415358]

>>4415281
2k link is awesome bro; scoop that shit up

[Anonymous No.4415434]

>>4415281
Unlikely before January. You are fairly safe.

[Anonymous No.4415495]

>>4410765
what is a realistic timeline for there to be a working product?

Im interested in becoming a linkie, I can't imagine you guys can keep getting JUST'd at this rate for much longer

[Anonymous No.4415565]

>>4415495
Q1-Q2 2018. Originally it was going live Q2. Rory said things were going well and it might be done sooner than that.

So assuming March at the earliest probably an announcement for the network going live in February or January at the absolute earliest. Nothing will happen in December.

[Anonymous No.4415621]

>>4415281
I don't think it would shoot to $1, but some new exchange might push it up significantly.

Side note, just bought more LINK at 2k sats. That was the last of my play money. Wish I had more to put into it at this time.

Easy 50% gains at least once BTC settles. Just a few days ago this was 3500 sats

[Anonymous No.4415825]

>>4413076
>>4413216

>Chainlink is the next google or apple
>Not the millions of other small startups that failed.

Deluded stinky linkies

[Annonymous No.4415929]

I am in the process trying to get my Ethereum into Binance, anybody know how safe binance is?

Does Link have its offsite wallet available? Like Ether?

[Anonymous No.4416023]

>>4415929
Yeah, Binance is safe. Just google ERC 20 wallet for a wallet to store it in.

[Anonymous No.4416272]

>>4415825
Gotta risk it to make the big bux. Stay poor

[Anonymous No.4416292]

>>4415929
It goes in your ETH wallet.

[Anonymous No.4416352]

>>4410860
inb4 ROPE ico

[Anonymous No.4416447]

>>4416352
it's funny that you say that, chainlink actually has more in common with rope, than with actual chainlink. multiple fibers = multiple nodes, no single point of failure, making the whole system stronger/ more reliable.

[Anonymous No.4416461]

I PUT MY LIFE SAVINGS INTO THIS AT 45 CENTS
FUCK YOU BIZ

[Anonymous No.4416527]

>>4415281

[Anonymous No.4416826]

>>4416527
What’s the meaning of this? You mock me with this image of a smug frog?

[Anonymous No.4416938]

Tell me /biz/:
>is running a node worthwhile and easy
>how many links do I need to be a node

[Anonymous No.4416958]

>>4416938
No and No unless you are a valuable data provider already and care about node priority.

[Anonymous No.4416963]

>>4416938
>is running a node worthwhile and easy

no

>how many links do I need to be a node
literally 0