Daily reminder that LPL is not a top 5 node operator

[Anonymous No.49950016]

> claims other revenue streams

Fiews already beat LinkPool to mainnet NAAS

> claims people will use their staking contracts

If the top node operators can beat LinkPool, they can probably write their own in-house staking contracts and avoid an admin fee

> claims staking/CCIP will increase their revenue

Yeah...so will holding LINK. Staking will also be available outside of just LinkPool

[Anonymous No.49950059]

LPL baggies btfo lmao

[Anonymous No.49950091]

I've been holding link for FOUR years and I STILL do not know what link pool is.

[Anonymous No.49950251]

Linkpool is legit if you got in early but right now its massively overvalued and the only way for it to be a worthy buy is for all other staking options to be terrible for link AND the price of link to stay low and for lpl to offer massive apy, none of which is likely to happen. My suspicion is there are lpl holders on this board that understand this and are somewhat aggresively shilling it by promoting whatever few means there are to get some, such as the bancor pool. They also use aggressive jeet tactics such as "stay poor" if you question it at all.
tl;dr its not a scam, if you got in early its worth it, but its also probably overvalued by a good amount now and there aren't any buyers or liquidity to capitalize on this.

[Anonymous No.49950278]

>>49950016
Why the weak fud?
Are you trying to get more LPL before the pool closes?

[Anonymous No.49950318]

>>49950251

When did ChainlinkP start reading biz. Anyways, agreed. LPL is not a scam, it just has no value

[Anonymous No.49950353]

>>49950016
chill down OP
there are people who paid 100k usd worth of ETH to get enough LP to stake 1k link
we don't want them to commit suicide now do we?

[Anonymous No.49950441]

>>49950353
You're right fren. Don't want to be responsible for multiple acts of sudoku

[Anonymous No.49950460]

>>49950016
Look dude, I don’t give a fuck about linkpool, but the fact that you’re going through all this effort to fud them makes me want to buy it just to piss you off.

[Anonymous No.49950510]

>>49950460
Do it. Idc about the price. I just want LPL bag holders to seethe when they've been trying to flex on biz and now the writings on the wall that they aren't gonna make it

[Anonymous No.49950573]

idk guys. maybe you feel comfortable just holding straight up LINK. I'm not a super trader and I'd rather be able to stake part of my stack knowing it will both appreciate and draw yield. over time it will definitely accrue more link than I would have if I just sold all my LPL right now, and I would still have my LPL afterward. linkpool is a known quantity too, and the currently market's only guaranteed entry into a pool from day 1. easy for me to just set and forget

[Anonymous No.49950660]

>>49950016

Daily reminder ChainLink P is a faggot nopooler and he missed the boat.

[Anonymous No.49950681]

>>49950573
just become an alerter bro

[Anonymous No.49950704]

>>49950573
The APY is literally 2% so if by over time you mean over a lifetime of 50 years, sure. But do you really think LinkPool will be around in 50 years? LINK is a protocol so that can exist forever (look at HTTP, TCIP, etc.). LinkPool is some random startup of 10 people that can easily be replaced any day.

There's no comfier hold than LINK. You could have literally made the same argument and replaced LinkPool with Bancor and look at what situation those bagholders are in.

[Anonymous No.49950738]

>>49950704
your first sentence is a braindead retard take and you obviously don't know enough to give any kind of opinion. just goes to show, only the mentally retarded and extremely intelligent will hold link, no inbetween. you're the former

[Anonymous No.49950763]

>>49950738
Seethe and let it all out retard. It's okay that you're ngmi

[Anonymous No.49950764]

>>49950510

[Anonymous No.49950802]

>>49950704
>The APY is literally 2%
staking isn't out yet
>>49950681
what's that

[Anonymous No.49950875]

>>49950764
Oh man is BASED_ORACLE here too? Hey just wanted to let you know you're the trashiest CT poster out there. No one cares about your lifestyle and your posts of drinking are of the lowest class. Trashier than Mat Beale and more arrogant too. Also you can't get pussy. AHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.49950934]

>>49950875
you're not going to get the mental help you need, because you're too poor and retarded, and no one cares about you enough to try and help take care of the problem that you've become. imagine, living your life. lmao.

[Anonymous No.49951008]

>>49950934
Nice projection dude. I hope you get help because you need it

[Anonymous No.49951089]

>>49950802
https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-staking-roadmap/
read the fuck up
and you call yourselves link holders ffs

[Anonymous No.49951333]

>>49951089
can anybody be an alerter? it doesn't really talk about the technical side too much. i could run one if there's no slashing for downtime, i'm really casual with my nodes

[Anonymous No.49951342]

>>49950875
lmaoo at least he hasn't begged anyone for donations when he "lost his funds"
It's always the same 5 poorfag linkers with less than <10k link that seethe at linkpool.

[Anonymous No.49951421]

>>49951333
checked
initially, only early adopters will have the chance to become alerters for the network, so if you don't have an ICO address, have fun waiting for v.1.5.6 or something lmao

[Anonymous No.49951542]

>>49950016
>daily
Oh maybe I was wrong yesterday

[Anonymous No.49951573]

>>49950278
Poolies act like LPL is a better hold tgoing forward han just holding LINK, they are insufferable

[Anonymous No.49951614]

>>49951573
Most poolies, like myself, got in very early and are just flexing because we have fast passes to LINK staking. LinkPool is not the best node objectively and there will be other competitors (as there should be), but for now it is the only clear path to retail staking.

[Anonymous No.49951754]

>>49951573
LinkPool is the best node objectively and there will be other competitors (hahaha good luck Rajesh), but for now it is the only clear path to retail staking.

[Anonymous No.49953293]

>>49950016
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.49955337]

Lpl has 0 volume = 0 demand TNN
Imagine buying Lpl instead of more link

[Anonymous No.49956413]

I have 25k poolies, I'm still buying the LPL that the 140k tard has left in bancor on every dip and I dont care about this thread. Sage and rage my negronis

[Anonymous No.49956505]

>>49950251
Worth buying and reselling the token?

[Anonymous No.49956643]

>>49956413
same here. got two more LPL buys to place in the next 3 days. draining the bancor retards LPL is a nice bonus

[Anonymous No.49956651]

>>49950016
Pools closed

[Anonymous No.49956666]

>>49955337
It’s volume is low because nobody wants to sell. 98% of lpl is staked. Cope and seethe harder

[Anonymous No.49956728]

>>49956666
If there was a demand for it the price would go up and people would sell. Thats basic economics coper.

[Anonymous No.49956784]

>>49956728
People are not selling because the value is in having a spot in staking with the best nodes. Pools closed

[Anonymous No.49956870]

>>49956728
it is being bought, LPL is only known to a very tiny slice of the market, and the people who know about it are keeping the price ratio around 0.4LINK/LPL because that's what they perceive to be "fair value" at this time. if they change their mind, or a new market participant decides that ratio is undervalued relative to LINK, then it will pump against link's price

[Anonymous No.49956936]

I am so thankful I got fully linkpilled in 2018 during the bear market and when the signal-to-noise ratio was optimal. Constant 300+ replies threads exploring potential use cases and daily breadcrumbs research, it was biz at its peak and in these unique conditions, so many forged crazy dreams and iron convictions.

[Anonymous No.49956946]

>>49956784
The best nodes have nothing to do with lpl, institutions are not gonna pump some grifters shitcoin just to stake, they will make their own nodes and advertise to get people to stake with them.
More link in the node = higher paying jobs

[Anonymous No.49956968]

>>49956870
Yeah well it looks pretty pathetic that this "amazing gem" has less volume and interest then your typical doge Elon musk pajeet scamcoin

[Anonymous No.49957057]

>>49956968
>if it's not a scam being scamtraded by scammers then it's a scam

[Anonymous No.49957285]

>>49957057
Its probably the lowest volume, most pathetic literal who shitcoin that gets shilled on /biz/

[Anonymous No.49957990]

>>49950573
assume you hold equal value of link and linkpool. Assume that staking is at max, 10% at 10% compounded it takes 7.25 years to get the same amount as if you sold your stack and doubled your link holdings. At 5% that's 14.2 years of waiting to equal the stack of link if you just bought now. Yikes

[Anonymous No.49958333]

>>49956946
This. Fudders are extremely desperate and seething. There is less than 2 LPL holders. Just goes to show how little high iq link holders there really is.

[Anonymous No.49958358]

>>49958333
>2 LPL
2000*.

[Anonymous No.49958456]

>>49957990
good analysis! but I think the APY will be much higher than 10%

[Anonymous No.49958573]

>>49958333

> 2 LPL holders

What was that about IQ?

>>49958456

> Believes APY will be more than 10% because they will just believe it into existence

LPL bag holders have so much copium they could get China addicted to it

[Anonymous No.49958693]

>>49958573
>9 seething posts by this id
>Still doesn't understand that lpl is more than just link staking
>Doesn't check my trips
Ngmi

[Anonymous No.49958712]

>>49958573
You alright there bud?

[Anonymous No.49958741]

>>49956643
I wanna buy but can't till next week...what am I in for?

[Anonymous No.49959358]

>>49958693

> Hasn't read the thread that LinkPool has been BTFO in its other revenue streams
> Thinks there's less than 2 LPL bag holders

Cope harder

[Anonymous No.49959433]

>>49959358
>Oh wowza a typo
Go back. Pool's closed.

[Anonymous No.49959521]

>>49958741
feels like we're on the verge of pumping but who the hell knows. hope you get your buy order in before it happens

[Anonymous No.49959530]

>>49950251
Top kek

[Anonymous No.49960974]

>>49959358
Linkpool earns nearly 5% of the chainlink networks fees.

[Anonymous No.49961109]

>>49950251
>Being late to the party is FUD now

>Staking is FUD now

Lmao I've seen it all and predicted it all

[Anonymous No.49961724]

>>49960974
Brainlet take. This will grow smaller and smaller as institutions onboard and btfo LinkPool where they're outside of the top 10 node operators.

[Anonymous No.49961772]

why are they the only ones tokenized, just tells me there is no need to tokenize this

[Anonymous No.49961826]

>>49958456
No, it won't.

[Anonymous No.49961933]

>>49961724
Institutions dont make their own infrastructure. They pay to use what is already built and reliable. You will use linkpools 3rd party contracts and you will like it.

[Anonymous No.49961966]

>>49961933
> Claims fintech companies don't make their own software

Clearly you're not in the tech or finance industry. Stay poor retard.

[Anonymous No.49962017]

>>49961966
>Doesn't know what infrastructure is
>Doesnt know how lazy boomers are
Pool's Closed.

[Anonymous No.49962050]

>>49962017

> Doesn't know that LINK protocol needed for infrastructure
> Claims to know what infrastructure is but doesn't work in tech or finance to understand what infrastructure is actually necessary

Hint: Fintech SWEs are some of the best in the world. Pool not needed

[Anonymous No.49962198]

>>49962050
>12 fud posts by this id
>Still seething
How much lpl do you own and how much do you have on bancor?

[Anonymous No.49962248]

>>49962198
Most of these replies are me dominating you so I'm pretty okay with the 12 posts. That's some projection you have there to think that if I wouldn't buy LPL that I'd provide liquidity for Bancor

[Anonymous No.49962291]

>>49962248
Ngmi you are blind.

[Anonymous No.49962316]

Pic related. Op is SEETHING, either a no pooler or banCucked.

[Anonymous No.49962320]

>>49961724
You are the Brainlet take to think institutions will just have their own infrastructure vs using already established infrastructure.

How much institutions have their own software for example? The freaking White House uses 3rd party security software for goodness sakes. The reality if something works institutes will just use it vs wasting their time making their own private versions

[Anonymous No.49962333]

>>49962291
Dominated lmao

[Anonymous No.49962361]

>>49962320
I think you have zero clue about what kind of institutions are being onboarded. Governments (white house) will always contract out their software. Fintech does not. A Fintech swe is paid at least 10x that of a government SWE. If you don't believe me, look it up yourself. I can't solve ignorance for you though.

[Anonymous No.49962387]

>>49962320
no anon, institutions are lining up as we speak to run nodes and compete for reputation in v.0.1, it's OVER! :^)

[Anonymous No.49963030]

>>49962361
Fintech is a meme.
>Just build your own sass
Pool's closed
>>49962333
Pool's closed

[Anonymous No.49963135]

>>49963030

Imagine seething so hard that the majority of your replies are pools closed. D-d-d-dominated!!!

[Anonymous No.49963200]

>>49963135
Pool's closed. You've been dominated by jonny for too long aye. Starting to go schitso on /biz/ by lying on the internet. Ngmi.

[Anonymous No.49963352]

>>49963135
>>49962361
>>49962248
>>49962050
>>49961966
>>49959358
>>49958573
>>49951008
>>49950875
>>49950763
>>49950704
>>49950510
>>49950441
>>49950318
>15 posts by this ID
The only person who can have this much incentive here is Mat Beale.
Can someone post that one upshot of his enlarged nostril with his gay partner? I want to rip on him about the fact that the alkaline cocaine is literally burning away his nostrils and brain.

[Anonymous No.49963808]

>>49963352
Mat Beale is too retarded to come up with my replies. He's literally useless and I think it was a good move that LinkPool got rid of him. Pool

LPL still not needed though

[Anonymous No.49963832]

LPL isn't a scam lmao, but why would you ever buy it over more LINK?

[Anonymous No.49963864]

>>49956651
congrats on this

[Anonymous No.49963986]

>>49963832
>ITS NOT A SCAM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

[Anonymous No.49964019]

[Anonymous No.49964177]

>>49963352
I-I can't fucking believe people are still backing up this piece of shit retarded excuse of a project.
You would get far more worth from investing in something like VINU and thats a memecoin, why is there still such small, yet vocal community supporting this again?

[Anonymous No.49964294]

>>49950016
>project does not advertise, has been going strong for years now with progress to show for it
>aimed at a niche audience who are already sold on link, and have an interest in the network economics
>98+% of tokens staked rather than held for flipping showing 98% of holders are using the token for utility rather than speculation
>project dgaf about getting onto exchanges
If you don't like lpl don't buy it. If you've already bought it then you're probably part of the 98% staked so there's no point trying to fud. Threads like this are pointless and just show how much nopoolers are seething. If you've not got your lpl staked in the contract then just flip it already and buy something else, you're doing nobody any favours providing liquidity and are just losing your stack to IL