/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.50522881]

My entire future is in the hands of this man. There is no plan b

[Anonymous No.50522888]

>>50522881
SNEED

[Anonymous No.50522896]

>>50522888
checked & chucked

[Anonymous No.50522903]

>>50522881
link not needed.
im sorry

[Anonymous No.50522948]

>>50522881

Looks like your entire future is in his stomach.

[Anonymous No.50522957]

>>50522881
same, if link doesn't moon in the next two years ill litterally be homeless

[Are You A Moron OP No.50522959]

The problem most of you don't understand is that without the understand when then the problem because BTC was the first one in the second place, brainlets.

[Anonymous No.50522962]

>>50522881
Those are big hands

[Anonymous No.50522973]

>>50522881
Kek

[Anonymous No.50522976]

>>50522959
kek this bot is having a seizure

[Anonymous No.50522994]

>>50522962
If I take that shirt off, will you die?

[Anonymous No.50523013]

>>50522881
he's THICC

[Anonymous No.50523107]

>>50522959
hmmm...indeed...good point well made

[Anonymous No.50523116]

[Anonymous No.50523161]

>>50523116
With inflation this high, the HR staff deserves a raise, don't you think? Maybe a bonus as well, the last months have been stressful

[Anonymous No.50523191]

>>50523116
You keep posting this image and I still have zero idea what it even implies. Loads of small link transactions?

[Anonymous No.50523221]

>>50522881
buy some rope
you're gonna need it

[Anonymous No.50523365]

>>50523191
24/7. the only thing needed in defi is an oracle and a stable coin, everything else is obsolete, gas tokens included

[Anonymous No.50523416]

>>50522881
Same, I continue to put all of my money into link I literally cannot stop I'm addicted to buying link tokens I have no other investments

[Anonymous No.50523451]

>>50523116
That contract (0x5FB47355828c0902AcBBE759CEe1b8342c41178b) on polygon was created by 0xc66fbe50dd33c9aadd65707f7088d597c86fe00f aka gains.trade...

What are the implications of this? It seems to me like a nothingburger. A layer 2 dex using chainlink... cool but, not exactly groundbreaking. Am I missing something?

t. og linklet.

[Anonymous No.50523471]

>>50522881
>There is no plan b
Why do you hate me

[Anonymous No.50523523]

>>50523451
look under the hood, the only things needed to run this dex are dai, link and matic; remove matic and apply this to a permissioned chain and you have the cbdc layer

[Anonymous No.50523525]

>>50523116
>>50523365
This will make the price go for for sure this time!

[Anonymous No.50523543]

>>50523523
>look under the hood...
Will do, thanks.

[Anonymous No.50523544]

>>50523525
you should stop being active on twitter. everything is so dead you stick out

[Anonymous No.50523580]

>>50523543
if you have time to waste, I can only recommend the BIS talks on defi, cbdcs and interoperability, its all put out pretty clear; cbdcs will never interact with permissionless chains, commercial bank money will never be created on permissionless chains and all they need for native and synthetic cbdcs to run are a secure messaging system that follows established regulation when it comes to data protection and settlement finality

[Anonymous No.50523600]

>>50522881
He's Satoshi nakamoto. Look at Chico crypto on YouTube. He recently did a video explaining why.

Link, algo, xlm, XRP, xdc and quant are my preferred buys.

[Anonymous No.50523606]

>>50522881
It's over bros, Chainlink has now entered bear market. The markets will recover and go up forever while Chainlink slowly slides into oblivion. The Great Reset is cancelled, linkies will not inherit the world and we won't be their slaves. Ii-i-it's over for linkies.. they can never win.

[Anonymous No.50523776]

>>50522959

[Anonymous No.50523808]

>>50522881

[Anonymous No.50523868]

>>50522881
>Clown world has been pushed so hard that the only chance of escaping my slavery is by investing in internet Monopoly money
I don’t care if I lose it all, because there never was any alternative

[Anonymous No.50523895]

>>50523580
so you saying they don't need LINK at all?

[Anonymous No.50523903]

>>50523606
>the great reset it canceled

Good

[Anonymous No.50523941]

>>50523895
Yes

[Anonymous No.50523968]

>>50522959
only knower ITT

[Anonymous No.50523974]

>>50523895
>they won’t connect the oracle to permissionless chains
>”hurrrrrrr does this mean they won’t use oracles??”

Peak retard

[Anonymous No.50524370]

>>50523895
its the only thing they need, a token that isn't central bank money or commercial bank money that ensures the independence of the oracle

[Anonymous No.50524385]

>>50522881
you have no future

[Anonymous No.50524492]

>>50523808
I am not a huge fan of your meme fren.
Please don't post again, try this one instead.

[Anonymous No.50524499]

>>50522959
Pretty much

[Anonymous No.50524855]

>>50522959
Based and gpt pilled

[Anonymous No.50524869]

>>50522959

[Anonymous No.50524900]

>>50522881
>tfw Chainlink was my blan b

[Anonymous No.50524914]

>>50522959
/thread

[Anonymous No.50525006]

>>50522881
did you enter for the free big mac tho?

[Anonymous No.50525500]

>>50522959
i see you've really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like

[Anonymous No.50525541]

>>50523580
so my bags are worthless

[Anonymous No.50525586]

>>50525541
cant pay the oracle in any of the cbdcs that would compromise the system, needs to be a different value holding container

[Anonymous No.50525591]

When did he put in all that weight

[Anonymous No.50525652]

>>50522959

[Anonymous No.50525715]

>>50525586
i now see what was meant by tokenized trust

[Anonymous No.50525793]

>>50525715
now all that is needed is to remove the kyc beta test barrier and let the reputation staking and slashing system do its job, and scam a few twitter linkies out of their links by having them stake with us and deliberately have them slashed

[Anonymous No.50525804]

>>50523868
>Clown world has been pushed so hard that the only chance of escaping my slavery is by investing in internet Monopoly money
>I don’t care if I lose it all, because there never was any alternative
pretty much this, 100% all in on chainlink there is no alternative anymore
they really went overboard ever since the coof, clownworld in labour conditions is now beyond tolerable so its better to gamble it all speculative assets than having to spend 1 more day in the cage

>>50523580
>to run are a secure messaging system that follows established regulation
at that point dont even bother with blockchains and just use an excel sheet in google drive with limited access, its about as secure as whatever bullshit theyll think up

[Anonymous No.50525860]

>>50525804
There is no reason for one state to trust another state and his cbdc and excel sheets in an anarchic system because there are no guarantees that any state settles trades with other states. Like what swift has been doing since the 1970s, is what chainlink is now going to do in the 2020s

[Anonymous No.50525960]

>>50525860
except he's taking so fucking long to implement basic features like Staking and ccip that I might get bored and sell for a different token.

[Anonymous No.50525988]

>>50525960
Yes please sell your tokens now, that would be very great of you. Thanks for selling

[Anonymous No.50526164]

>>50525988
nah I'll wait for staking and if it doesn't pump then I'll probably sell for ETH which is what I should have done two years ago.

[Anonymous No.50526205]

>>50522881
Yes

[Anonymous No.50526214]

>>50526164
let me guess you are buying eth after le reddit merge and as you state yourself link after staking 1.0.
Thanks for staying true to the bizlet motto, buy high

[Anonymous No.50526222]

>>50526214
The merge is 10000000x more significant than anything that will happen in chainlink's lifetime.

[Anonymous No.50526235]

>>50526222
nothing changes for eth after the merge, only that eth is now secured by brrrr and not pow anymore, same as dozens over dozens of alt chains

[Anonymous No.50526250]

>>50522959
only high IQ understand this post

[Anonymous No.50526254]

>>50526222
wasted trips, eth doesn't have a monopoly on the L1 space and tradfi is basically shouting "interoperability" at you daily now to signal what is coming, its best usecase will be as a settlement layer, but cbdc's are still coming and they're going to need oracles to interact with each other.

[Anonymous No.50526270]

>>50526254
>settlement layer
>non deterministic
never going to happen on chains like eth in relation to central banks and tradfi. There cant be uncles in tradfi for legal reasons

[Anonymous No.50526273]

>>50525860
i am not talking about link itself, its about the cbdc
if they implement it as the anon i replied to said it would be its just a joke, utter clown world
link on the other hand is a legit crypto and can connect any system, like you said it could replace swift in pretty short order right now
but then it would be connecting tradfi fiat, not connecting cryptos
the proposal to replace present day settlement for cbdc inbetween nationstate actors is retarded, the cbdcs are only to be distributed to the worthless peasants, but no powerful actor will ever accept the sheer cuckening that permissioned digital currency holds
if nationstates don't trust eachother today, why go ahead and tomorrow accept currency that can be cancelled or has a timespendlimit build it, regardless if oracles confirm the correct amount of cbdc's at time of transaction

>>50525793
good idea but i need to see the redistribution system in action first before we make worse entities than twitter fags richer with it

[Anonymous No.50526350]

>>50526270
even worse for eth then, the point being eth merge is a fucking meme and if people here haven't realized that the whole world telling you "be excited about thing!" isn't reason to be wary you deserve to never make it. people bitch about chainlink shilling here but its literally nowhere else, I got my brother to start his stack 2 years ago, he told me during the bull run about his friends mentioning crypto (he's an aerospace engineer and works for the government), not a single one mentioned or knew what chainlink was. people on here will lie to you and tell you its shilled and held by normies, because thats exactly what they fear, they suffer imposter syndrome and are scared at the possibility they'll make it.

[Anonymous No.50526483]

this board is an echo chamber that believes in link. that is true. the lie is that link is mainstream or held by normalfags and that you're late. it has had one hype cycle so far, where it entered mainstream consciousness, that was summer 2020, and it died before the actual crypto bullrun even began (probably not a coincidence). you even had link whales literally paying roasties to shill link just to fud anons out of buying more, since they understood the strongest fud for anyone on here is women holding crypto. don't underestimate how bitter some anons are, always remember the kevin chang quote.

[Anonymous No.50526500]

>>50526273
Nation states never trusted each other. That is the basic rule in an anarchic state, you can only reduce mistrust, and looking at ecb and fed not abiding by paper contracts toward the Russians, if one would have had different central bank chains being interconnected with chainlink oracles and deterministic smart contracts governing them, that would not have been possible.
And I doubt that the average citizen will ever come in contact with cbdcs, as muc as they dont get in contact with central bank money
>>50526350
eth is the communist cancer in the hobbsian nightmare

[Anonymous No.50526521]

>>50522881
Then it's over.

[Anonymous No.50526522]

>>50526483
>this board is an echo chamber that believes in link
I just shit myself laughing

[Anonymous No.50526529]

>>50526483
>>50526350
>>50526270
You’re coping and the other anon is right. If it doesn’t affect the price then it doesn’t fucking matter. Look what is happening right now. Eth is pumping meanwhile link is bleeding again.

At the end of the day price is the only thing that matters

[Anonymous No.50526581]

>>50526529
>If it doesn’t affect the price then it doesn’t fucking matter
Here's Chainlink pumping in the minutes after the Associated Press news.
Guess what happened the very next minute.

[Anonymous No.50526595]

>>50526522
checked and you're probably the autist that misinterprets everything as fud, I'm literally telling you that a lot of the fud on here is link holders who unironically believe in the project and think its going to make them rich and just want impatient zoomers to miss it. and no I'm not denying there's also paid fudders, jeets/bulgarians, special interests, and seething nolinkers that fud as well, but just saying basically anyone on here with half a brain already has bought into link, they all hold link, its just their self confidence in the project is so high they believe they can spend all day shitposting to fud people out of it because they understand the usecases that will cause it to rise in price are completely independent of retail.

[Anonymous No.50526608]

>>50526529
what matters, price over a long period of time, or an indeterminate time frame that you decide? if its the former link is already one of the most successful projects ever, if its the latter then you're literally just a newfag who suffers from fomo

[Anonymous No.50526610]

>>50526595
Fud is fud.
If you shit in your own mouth it doesn't matter if you're doing it to troll other people.
In the end you're still eating shit.

[Anonymous No.50526643]

>>50526529
eth has no future in tradfi, all it has is the shitcoin casino where it is facing extreme low barriers for competition. The only chain that has settlement finality is dusk

[Anonymous No.50526809]

>>50526350
>the whole world telling you "be excited about thing!" isn't reason to be wary
anyone remember how the bitmex ginger anagram shilled people eth at above 3k not too long ago, and he never once mentioned link despite link ticking all the boxes he used to classify eth the coin to buy in '19
>>50526483
the absolute fake farcebook and twitter profiles being paid for by whales since the summer of defi were so obvious it was hilarious, you would have to be a total moron to fall for it, but since people said back in the previous cycle they used it as a top indicator whales will run with it
and i am not sure about the bitterness of /biz/ anons, most people who have been here before 2020 have made it and once you are free you just don't care about such things anymore

>>50526500
yes i get that, but then the chains used to settle international trade between nationstate actors must have several of the traits that make cryptos trustless and that is again in direct conflict with the anon i was responding to
again if nation states don't trust each other today why would they settle for an even worse system tomorrow
but in my opinion i think we are going to see a bifurcation in money, right now the same dollar joe sixpack earns at his walmart job is used to buy 10 million barrels of oil
in the future that ends, the peasants get fuck you money that only buys shit in the company store but no asset owner will ever accept in return for his assets, while rich people and international trade will settle in another thing entirely completely removed from the plebes so as to completely cement the class divide into a caste divide
but again as mentioned several times now this new international currency must be trustworthy it cant be infinitely printed fiat garbage anymore even if its now digital in name only

[Anonymous No.50526824]

>>50523808
this meme is straight up sus. Ain't bussin at all. fr fr

[Anonymous No.50526942]

>>50526610
Lol you ARE the autist that misinterprets everything as fud.

[Anonymous No.50526947]

>>50526809
Joe is already using commercial bank money and if he is a dune coon most likely narrow bank money. The big dogs have master accounts with the central bank using central bank money.
I doubt that the money is going to be trustworthy, you cant dictate sovereign nation states what their monetary policy has to look like as what global socialists wet their pants over, the best that can be done is reduce the mistrust by automating contract executions trustlessly for which a trust minimizing oracle is needed.
I can imagine nation states coming to, yes, just a paper agreement that such a system might be slightly more benfitial for their security than what they have now.

Joe has nothing to say in this matter, he is getting leveraged

[Anonymous No.50526975]

>>50526529
this is just ridiculously stupid
all the link fud only ever came after the summer of defi at which point all the usecases and tech were proven to work and not be a ponzi
at any timeframe between last cycles bottom and now link has been one of the best performing coins and outpaced eth all the way, the only way to win would have been to know the exact defi summer peak, sold your link there and bought eht to sell exactly 14 months later, otherwise even hodling all the way down link is the objective better performer
>inb4 muh shib

anyways if you believe short term price action beats long term fundamentals, sell all your link right now and buy solana, i mean it has to win right look at how much it went up the past few weeks, and who cares that it stops its chain regularly and functions on a defacto proof of discord standard, thats just word salad to fud the price right

[Anonymous No.50526994]

>>50525500

Double checked, and yes, that was the first thing I thought of

[Anonymous No.50526998]

>>50526942
How is this shit: >>50526522
not literal fud

[Anonymous No.50527024]

>>50526947
you seem to be have a complete reading comprehension failure so i am not going to bother to argue against your non sequiturs, save
>you cant dictate sovereign nation states what their monetary policy has to look
i just explained internal and external monies to you, and then yes absolutely the BIS can dictate you to conform to standards regarding international trade money

[Anonymous No.50527027]

>>50526998
It is literal fud.
He's a tranny using doublespeak
>men are women
>fud isn't fud

[Anonymous No.50527120]

>>50522959
>you don't understand is that without the understand when then
See this is the problem with people, without the understand then you will never understand. Linkers gloss over this like it is nothing.

[Anonymous No.50527139]

>>50526581
what happened to their node? did it close up shop due to lack of customers?

[Anonymous No.50527152]

>>50522959
/biz/ is too retarded for this knowledge even when you're spoon feeding. Don't cast pearls before swine anon.

[Anonymous No.50527174]

>>50523808
>tfw holding since 2017

[Anonymous No.50527175]

>>50522881
Bruh, this man looks like he’s gonna die TODAY, how can you trust him with any future?

[Anonymous No.50527209]

>>50522959

[Anonymous No.50527380]

>>50523365
That is just GNS' nft bots, I recognized one of the addresses immediately.
We essentially use LINK as gas for the platform.

[Anonymous No.50527603]

As a normie clinging to his LINK hoping to take the ride, I appreciate the attempt at high level conversation today gentleman.

[Anonymous No.50527945]

>>50527603
funny how the conversation just died down all of a sudden, is it shift change in the jeet sweat shop or did they open up a fresh street as designated

[Anonymous No.50527956]

>>50527380
>use LINK as gas for the platform
could you elaborate

[Anonymous No.50528151]

>>50527603
There is no such thing as high level conversation on this board, it's a useless echo chamber designed to extract your shekels into their pockets. Have you ever asked yourself why chainlink doesn't pump if it's so valuable. If it will truly be the centre of an emerging web3 ecosystem then billionaires would be scooping up as much as possible... but they don't? Curious? The very wealthy are buying BTC and ETH (if they are buying crypto at all) but ignoring LINK. Just pause and ask yourself why that is considering that the wealthiest people are also, by far, the smartest people on the planet (smarter than anyone on this trash-heap of a board, for sure).

[Anonymous No.50528292]

As someone who is way over their head (and underwater) with too much LINK I have often wondered why if there is supposed to be so much institutional utilization of Chainlink, why they aren’t buying the shit out of it.

[Anonymous No.50528577]

>>50528151
If anyone actually falls for this then you're just confirming this anon's assertion there is no one smart on this board. The smartest people are not the wealthiest by a longshot, there are many other factors such as ruthlessness, innovation, luck, and ESPECIALLY nepotism and (((in group favoritism))).

Also completely ignoring risk:reward, crypto is already an extremely risky asset class, if you assume it never develops beyond what it already is btc and eth are the safest plays. Of course assuming smart contracts wouldn't matter would have made btc the safest play and you'd have missed eth completely in 2017.

[Anonymous No.50528632]

>>50528292
because 1), the ones who understand it already own massive amounts and 2), what moves price isn't a whale buying a large amount unless its a shitcoin, its buy pressure consistently higher than sell pressure. For crypto as a whole this only happens around 1 year of every 4 due to the btc halvening and by extension attracting retail retards who want to gamble on shitcoins being the next btc, ie eth and shitcoin casino. For chainlink, its an assymetrical bet, it isn't attempting to be another btc, it also isn't an "eth killer" (which in the current market is just another way of saying alternative shitcoin casino, ie bnb), its a novel usecase for smart contracts that is still in the extremely early stages of adoption.

[Anonymous No.50528652]

>>50528151
well if they were smart they would have bought btc 10 years ago not now, even assuming risk aversion they would have bought in 2015/16 when it was clear they were not going away
buying btc now is late game, so its now the skill to recognize the new btc play before it manifests itself, but thats both difficult and cant be proven correct until years down the line so you end up with midwits like you saying what you say
just remember
Chainlink
Oracles
Power
Everything

[Anonymous No.50528727]

>>50528652
its not even that complicated, its just simple risk reward. those with money tend to take very little risk, its the same reason so many on this board like to talk about their cash out plan or their make-it amount, obviously getting out at 10 million isn't the most optimal play, but its safe. chainlink is a riskier play than btc or eth because if crypto just stays in its current useless shitcoin casino state for the next 10 years, btc and eth are more relevant than link for that. if it grows at all, if smart contract adoption to real world usecases occurs, or interoperability invalidates the L1 maxi argument turning it into a race to the bottom, then link wins it all. the status quo though is shitcoin casino only, its an uphill battle, hence more risk, but greater potential reward.

[Anonymous No.50528786]

>>50522881
This hits a bit too close to home. If LINK isn't over $90 EOY, I'm fucked. Like: I'll kms kind of fucked.

[Anonymous No.50528829]

>>50522959
yes

[Anonymous No.50528835]

>>50526998
the image in the post you quoted is fud, but its just a bot, its like background noise for any experienced anon, annoying and distracts newfags but ultimately meaningless. the other anon claiming my statement that this board is an echo chamber for link was fud, wasn't understanding what I was saying, while echo chamber can have a negative connotation, my point was the people who hate link and the ones who love it all agree that if crypto has any future usecase beyond shitcoin casino, links going to be at the center of it (and no I'm not counting xrp schizos because I suspect the majority of them are just delphi anons playing the longcon).

[Anonymous No.50528940]

>>50528835
How much 4dder4ll do you take?

[Anonymous No.50528954]

>>50528727
this is the part i never get, so when you reach certain number you supposedly just give up and go hold vanguard for the rest of your life when you drown yourself in booze or something
every calculation of the /biz/ made it number i have seen included enough left to keep trading the crypto gain
i mean cashing out is good to diversify some but you always stay in after that the better play is in the barbell strategy and emergent tech is still the best profit case

as to the rest the smartcontract usecase and the L1 maxi arguments have already been settled now havent they

[Anonymous No.50529013]

>>50528954
its a psychological thing, humans fear failure more than they seek success, its evolutionary because if a caveman succeeds at something, he feels good for a bit, but if he fails he just dies, so naturally the ones that are the most death averse would live on and pass on their genes. ironically this is why there's an unusually high amount of niggers that invest in crypto even though they're largely tech illiterate, they are less risk averse than smarter races, less evolved.

[Anonymous No.50529018]

>>50522959
based stroke enjoyer

[Anonymous No.50529106]

>>50522881
This pic is edited, right?

[Anonymous No.50529109]

>>50522959
>The problem most of you don't understand is that without the understand when then the problem because BTC was the first one in the second place, brainlets.

High IQ here, you’re welcome:
*The problem is that most don’t understand what the problem was/is. Bitcoin was able to solve the first problem, the new problem and solution to that problem will put Bitcoin in second place.

[Anonymous No.50529138]

>>50523808
This is a fucking stupid picture. Please, for the love of Allah, never post it again.

[Anonymous No.50529226]

>>50523116
Staking

[Anonymous No.50529462]

>>50529013
this might be true for the average normie and i say this is a result of being serfs in agricultural societies for it takes quite a lot of risk tolerance to hunt mega fauna with sharp sticks
but thats all besides the point: normies arent here and normies don't make massive gains
in order to reach made it money you needed risk aversion/tolerance in the first place, its a self filtering kinda thing
and again when you have enough stashed away in 'safe' investments what the everloving fuck would hold you back from going into high risk plays
just look to every successful guy in tech and crypto, did musk stop, did the winklevii, did the bankman, did it even stop fucking AC from putting 20 fucking bil on the line to zero
so stop it with the dumb normie preprogramming bullshit people here aren't going to go 100% out of crypto

[Anonymous No.50529630]

>>50529462
the fuck are you talking about nigger, I'm not saying that is what people should do, I'm saying that's what a lot will do whether they claim otherwise because while people talk a big game when they have nothing, things change when the spotlights on and you're playing with real money. obviously the smartest play is to continue to just think purely logically and ignore your instincts, but this isn't what people do, and its why (some) rich investors aren't devoting larger amounts to risky plays like DLT. perfect example, football coaches, get paid millions, are supposed to think outside the box and consider every possibility. statistically its a huge gain to go for 2 on every extra point instead of 1, but they almost always go for 1, know why? because they will get killed in the media and more likely to be fired if it fails, more than they will be praised as being a genius if they succeed 60+% of the time. also wehtehr normalfag (don't use normie) or anon, we all have goals, and when you reach your financial goals taking on continued risk is unnecessary and literally the definition of greed. I don't look down on it as we're all greedy to some degree, but if your goal is to have enough money just to fuck off from society, why would you continue to play investment games and gamble it all when you've already reached that goal?

[Anonymous No.50529704]

>>50522959

[Anonymous No.50529824]

>>50529630
Make it stack

[Anonymous No.50529830]

>>50529630
And is staking coming in August

[Anonymous No.50529855]

my entire future is in good hands since my largest holding is Polygon (ticker: MATIC), and as i see it you won't make it in crypto unless you have matic in your portfolio, since its outperforming all other alts

[Anonymous No.50529882]

>>50522959

[Anonymous No.50529905]

>>50529630
>don't use normie
what, also using burger sportsball reference i don't know where you are from but you have to go back
do you have a reading comprehension problem people here are very far from normal if i have to explain that to you, you really don't belong here

>gamble it all when you've already reached that goal
i don't think i can explain this in terms you will understand, but the simple answer is that we are hooked but this point and we find it simply enjoyable, it also isn't gambling its using our autism into productive endeavors that doesn't require us to interact with normies
honestly i wouldn't know how i would cope with life if these internet opportunities didn't exist and i was forced into the cage to interact with the normies

[Anonymous No.50529943]

>>50522959
>was the first one in the second place
poetry

[Anonymous No.50529950]

>>50529905
nigger I've been here since 2003 and most of the posters here are american, fucking europoors only started shitting the place up around 2010
>i don't think i can explain this in terms you will understand, but the simple answer is that we are hooked but this point and we find it simply enjoyable, it also isn't gambling its using our autism into productive endeavors that doesn't require us to interact with normies
honestly i wouldn't know how i would cope with life if these internet opportunities didn't exist and i was forced into the cage to interact with the normies
you aren't explaining shit to me you're literally arguing with yourself, nowhere in any of my posts did I advocate not investing in crypto or taking risks or cashing out, all I was discussing was an answer to the anon who posted the obviously bullshit quesiton of "well why don't all the rich people just invest in crypto?"

[Anonymous No.50530073]

>>50529950
>nowhere in any of my posts did I advocate not investing in crypto or taking risks or cashing out
>but if your goal is to have enough money just to fuck off from society, why would you continue to play investment games and gamble it all when you've already reached that goal?

is your reading comprehension below freezing or what, you have consistently said that after you made it you cash out based on risk aversion

users being american had nothing to do with my argument, its about few people here will understand the reality of being a football coach so its a terrible metaphor to explain an argument against the audience you have
and no europeons have been here since pretty much the beginning as this was the non nip place to discuss animoos if you've really been here since 2003 explain why you correct another anon against the use of normies and tell an old meme so we know you are lying
and i have no idea what arguing against myself even means, show me where i am non consist in my argument
is the statement we continue to play the crypto casino not for profit but for fun really incomprehensible to you?

[Anonymous No.50530098]

>>50530073
When do you think link will have its run

[Anonymous No.50530134]

>>50528151
what has happened to this board
what a fucking retard
yeah let's buy projects that can do a 5x or 10x
let's not look forward and think what will be the future

[Anonymous No.50530213]

>>50530098
timing is pointless only the inevitable endpoint, but to give a non meme answer to your question probably not until after full staking
so yeah you could still go with an eth outperformance for the timing being and swing it if you are feeling lucky

[Anonymous No.50530247]

>>50530213
My personal nightmare would be Link staying at 40-50€ for 2 years. Too high to buy, too low to make a living

[Anonymous No.50530276]

>>50530213
When are we going to get full staking any timeframe?

[Anonymous No.50530366]

>>50530247
thats exactly why recently i have called so many people total idiots for not at least starting to dca in at 6, because they were convinced it has to hit 3 and even if it did they still would not buy but convince themselves to wait for 1
but you should be happy anon for even having the chance to buy today if it wasn't for the cefi circus we would not have had this glorious opportunity

>>50530276
nobody but the big guy knows, so unless you work for him there is no way to tell, you cant ta fundamentals like that
then it boils down to the risky play do you want to own link now or swing it for more link later when sergey could announce staking next month

[Anonymous No.50530416]

>>50530366
And can link really flip btc I have seen some anon talking seems way too optimistic

[Anonymous No.50530422]

>>50530366
>but you should be happy anon for even having the chance to buy today if it wasn't for the cefi circus we would not have had this glorious opportunity
Indeed, I managed to increase my position. Thank to those greedy cefi fucks.
Btw what do you think of ICP anon?

[Anonymous No.50530486]

>>50530422
Shut up Pajeet!

[Anonymous No.50530503]

>>50530416
i dont dare say, maybe years down the line if the schizos are right about all stonk markets going into 24/7 tokenized markets and all the wef cbdc stuff is real
but i think its safe to say not likely in the near term, but it doesnt have to, link MC is just 3 bil right now thats almost nothing with btc at peak being 1.3 tril
next cycle peak btc being between 5 to 10 tril and link being 1-2 tril is entirely possible and not overly optimistic

>>50530422
>Btw what do you think of ICP anon?
i don't care about vc scams or about coins that ico in the top, both of those are warning signs to stay away for me so i never looked into the tech gonna need to ask someone else

[Anonymous No.50530541]

>>50522959
but has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

[Anonymous No.50530776]

>>50522959
Is that you Yoda?

[Anonymous No.50531066]

>>50528292
Because there is no institution buying. It’s wait and see. If one single billionaire wanted to get ahead of the pack they’d drain exchanges of their liquidity. The fact we are rank 25 says big investors aren’t buying what Shitgey is selling

[Anonymous No.50531128]

>>50523808
holy newfag, pls stop

[Anonymous No.50531147]

why does he cultivate mass

[Anonymous No.50531251]

Syscon's anticipated Vilidium will offer speeds of up to four million transactions per second and truly do away with the perceived limitations on blockchain technology.

[Anonymous No.50531299]

>>50522881
Same bro... 25 y/o and my whole life is depending on whether he pumps my bags.

[Anonymous No.50531357]

>>50523808
>bought link at $10
>bought more at $20
>bought more at $14
>bought more at $10
>bought more at $6
>will buy more at $4
HAHAHAHA I AM INSANE

[Anonymous No.50531803]

>>50530503
I dunno bro, don’t underestimate how fucking stupid the market is. That was my mistake this bull run. I made a stupid prediction where I thought “oh, well fucking Ripple was able to hit over $35 billion market cap in 2017 bullrun surely LINK will have no problem hitting that in the next bull”, we barely got halfway there in the end. That’s also with token inflation pushing up the supply. There’s two really bad things at play with LINK. It’s too hard for most people to understand, most are retards and just go for things that are full
of buzzwords, hype or irony/shitposts (e.g. all the dog shit), and then there’s all the blatant manipulation that happens with LINK in particular. We know CeFi niggers really fucked us over in the last couple of years.

[Anonymous No.50532071]

>>50522959
fren the problem with your analysis is but when then second one go like down first one we look at over to be fortunate but only then does ever anyone do BTC in the first place.

t. Follow genius (we are always misunderstood)

[Anonymous No.50532135]

>>50532071
holy shit, im gonna be rich

[Anonymous No.50532148]

>>50526270
Big Boys will use private Hyperledger ETH stack.

2024 Big Boys will use Hyperledger Andromeda stack.

2050 Big Boys will use whatever LI and whatever private chain.

LINK wins regardless.

[Anonymous No.50532260]

>>50526500
if the hobbesian anarchical thesis were true there would be no Antarctica treaty or the treaty would have serious gaps and renegotiations as states break it

[Anonymous No.50533183]

>>50532148
What is LI?

[Anonymous No.50534429]

>>50526595
>lot of the fud on here is link holders who unironically believe in the project and think its going to make them rich and just want impatient zoomers to miss it
I don't believe this is the case anymore. Before the bull, yes for sure. But after.. where we have fud coming and going, I tend to think that the autists are no longer responsible. The quality of fud when they were in control was high, and believable. Remember this was essentially what the Zeus capital report was. Three years of biz poster fud condensed. Now fud is garbage tier. I don't think if it were the same people that it would degrade so much. No, I think others are fudding now, for whatever reason- I even think your post makes it seem like you are related to whoever is fudding in some way..

[Anonymous No.50534736]

>>50522881
That is quite dumb of you, retard, having all your eggs in a basket. I can tell you also do not make use of privacy platforms that keeps sensitive wallet data hidden from potential hackers

[Anonymous No.50534966]

>>50526350
There’s 5,000 people in the world with a worthwhile stack of link. I’d imagine 85% of those holders /biz/ or people connected to us /biz/ holders (friends, parents, gay lovers).

So you really probably only have about 500-1000 actual normies/Reddit tourists with 5k+ stacks in the entire world.

Then you can throw in about 15,000 other people in the world with 1k-5k stacks since 1,000 link is at the 20,000th holder. So half of those 15,000 are probably late comer new fags to /biz/ and the other 7,000 are redditfags.

[Anonymous No.50535016]

>>50528727
I always used to think the never selling retards were retards but they are unironically right. Sure if you get to 10 million take out 2-3 million to just fucking do whatever. But they are crashing everything in order to implement this gay fucking new financial system of which link facilitates. So it doesn’t matter if it’s 2-3% returns because nothing else will offer that and it’ll be safe as fuck. And if you have a big enough bag and LINK goes to 5,000 or whatever then 2-3% will be amazing.

[Anonymous No.50536113]

Any bright anons can illuminate the Hyperledglet anons recent claims?
If you have various parties settling within permissioned hypeledger chains why tf they need the Chainlink keepers. Hyperledget is not very hyper if it can’t resolve this itself. Is there any evidence whatsoever that Chainlink is a permissioned user of the big hyperledget private enterprise grade chains or it’s just more hopium?

[Anonymous No.50536231]

>>50529109
bbased stroke victim translator

[Anonymous No.50536342]

>>50522959
Based esl schizo

[Anonymous No.50536381]

>>50526809
>the absolute fake farcebook and twitter profiles being paid for by whales since the summer of defi were so obvious it was hilarious, you would have to be a total moron to fall for it, but since people said back in the previous cycle they used it as a top indicator whales will run with it

[Anonymous No.50536391]

>>50526809
>most people who have been here before 2020 have made it and once you are free you just don't care about such things anymore
They made it in 2021 if they sold.

pro tip: they didn't

[Anonymous No.50536410]

>>50536381
>>50536391
Great posts Thomas!

[Anonymous No.50536440]

>>50536410
Think of the level of autism of someone who has the opportunity to come up with any pseudonym on the planet, and all they can think of is "Chainlink" then their first name.
That's, like, spending all day reading bus schedules levels of autistic. Trainspotter tier.

[Anonymous No.50536467]

>>50534966
Within those 5000 wallets are exchanges with millions of link. So people who keep their stack on an exchange are not counted correctly.

[Anonymous No.50536478]

>>50536467
So how is my assessment off?

[Anonymous No.50536493]

>>50534966
GME Reddit tourist with almost 5k link reporting in

[Anonymous No.50536570]

>>50536467
people who keep their stack on an exchange are not human and do not deserve consideration

[Anonymous No.50536578]

I've been holding LINK for so long with little to no results that I'm genuinely starting to wonder whether this boards obsession with it is ironic and meant to confuse non autists who don't really know much about crypto.

[Anonymous No.50536758]

>>50536578
Lol

[Anonymous No.50536777]

Dont know how anybody could estimate that.
But its probably true that few people keep more than 5k link on an exchange.

[Anonymous No.50536784]

>>50536478
>>50536777

[Anonymous No.50536830]

>>50536758
>Lol

[Anonymous No.50536838]

I haven't been on /biz/ lately, I have the overwhelming urge to FUD this piece of shit Russian scammer and his kike token.

[Anonymous No.50537332]

>>50536493
Kill yourself faggot

[Anonymous No.50537796]

>>50534966
well i hope you are not keeping all your stinkies in a single wallet anon, thats risky all manner of unexpected shit could happen, i for one am 5 of those 5000 people
now yes there will be a few whales who keep their stack on cex'es or whatnot but if you take it all in consideration that number is a lot lower, there is probably 1000-2000 people, mostly anons, with worthwhile link stacks and right now a lot more are accumulating in
but the point stands the few of us are going to be called lucky in a few years, they will compare u to the people that mined btc on their regular fucking laptops

[Anonymous No.50537916]

>>50536381
like i said paid for, tho you can find a few real ones
>>50536391
projecting your failure onto others, i wasnt speaking about pure link holders people with diversified crypto folios sold either in dec or feb and made out like a bandit, just because you failed doesnt mean everyone fails

[Anonymous No.50537980]

>>50534429
Blah blah blah man the fatigue everyone has just reading this cope. Running in circles. The new fud is literallt just reality…the team releases nothing and the coin crashes. Theres your fud. But hey we got a big mac tweet.

[Anonymous No.50538004]

>>50522881
He dumps on you

[Anonymous No.50538035]

>>50534736
All my link are on a trezor

[Anonymous No.50538080]

>>50523808
>tfw been on the internet and 4chan so long you can immediately sniff out real normie memes, ironic 4chan crafted normie memes, and post ironic Twitter crafted normie memes like this one

[Anonymous No.50538177]

>>50537980
So.. nothing changed since the start of the year and the staking announcement? Got it

[Anonymous No.50538641]

>>50538177
Nothing changed, no.
Staking and ccip are still scheduled for release this year.

[Anonymous No.50538669]

>>50522959
One day all will understand that truth

[Anonymous No.50538899]

>>50534966
>There’s 5,000 people in the world with a worthwhile stack of link. I’d imagine 85% of those holders /biz/ or people connected to us /biz/ holders
Nah there's just a couple thousands link holder on /biz/ and it has been established that the average /biz/ holder have a 1k suicide stack.

[Anonymous No.50539017]

>>50522881
no u

[Anonymous No.50539508]

>>50536410
Thanks fren

[Anonymous No.50539553]

>>50522959
Someone call a bondulance

[Anonymous No.50539584]

daily reminder that 200K of LINK holders hold less tham 1 LINK. Do what you will with that information.

[Anonymous No.50539617]

>>50522959

[Anonymous No.50539638]

>>50539584
Reminder that literally 99.99% of the world population doesn't own Chainlink. Do what you will with that information.
>In the future, there will be two castes of people: those that own Chainlink, and those that don't.

[Anonymous No.50539678]

>>50523191
small tx size is the ETH for gas. the big LINK token allocation for the OUTFLOW is not depicted in this pictures.

[Anonymous No.50539753]

>>50538080
I'm kind of a fan of what pol has done with the chud meme. not the thick girthy chud, but the original chud face.

I saw some weird shit with the chuds riding down trannies in a chariot, chucking nooses at their necks like spears, in the drawing style of some Epic like The Odyssey.

Who the fuck came up with that shit? It's like some of the most creative works I've ever seen

[Anonymous No.50539840]

>>50522959
I thought that when systems builds who doesn’t code for systematic paper promise risk then they won’t and can’t seem like it

[Anonymous No.50539921]

>>50522959
Nahone

[Anonymous No.50540075]

>>50529106
Yeah. That's a PR stunt. He was way fatter in that interview.

[Anonymous No.50540203]

>>50534966
Holy shit. I have almost 44k links. I forgot that's there's less than 1000 of us

[Anonymous No.50540228]

>>50522881
Damn he a big boi

[Anonymous No.50540294]

>>50523600
Actually very compelling evidence.

[Anonymous No.50542638]

>>50523600
Checked; look into Everest for their compliance protocol

[Anonymous No.50542655]

>>50522881
>My entire future is in the hands of this man. There is no plan b
That's not his fault.

[Anonymous No.50542770]

>>50522903
Nexo is insolvent. Also check pic related retard.

[Anonymous No.50542870]

>>50522959
Has anyone yet been able to refute this?

[Anonymous No.50542920]

>>50539753
>I saw some weird shit with the chuds riding down trannies in a chariot, chucking nooses at their necks like spears, in the drawing style of some Epic like The Odyssey.
please can you find the image and post?

[Anonymous No.50542936]

>>50522959
what? can someone translate schizo to normie please

[Anonymous No.50542978]

>>50522959
thread derailed

[Anonymous No.50544148]

>>50522959
Mashalla

[Anonymous No.50544209]

>>50523808
Based

[Anonymous No.50544221]

T R I L L I O N S

[Anonymous No.50544298]

>>50540203
>Holy shit. I have almost 44k links. I forgot that's there's less than 1000 of us
I have 2.5k.
Is it enough?

[Anonymous No.50544314]

>>50544298
It will easily retire you rich, but you will need to hold for a while.

[Anonymous No.50544413]

>>50544314
>It will easily retire you rich, but you will need to hold for a while.
I'm ok with a while. I might add to my stack, but don't really see putting more than another $60k USD into it over the next year.

You're thinking 3 years, 10 years, or some other version of a while?

I had 200 ETH during the bull and offloaded 75% of it, so I'm at $700k net worth, with 50 ETH, 2.5k LINK, 2400 UNI and .2 BTC being my remaining crypto.

[Anonymous No.50544529]

>>50544413
Put everything you own into LINK. Use any extra money that you don’t need to survive into LINK. Within 2 years you will need to hire people to help you manage all your finances.

[Anonymous No.50544544]

>>50544529
you scammers never stop

[Anonymous No.50544559]

>>50544529
>Put everything you own into LINK. Use any extra money that you don’t need to survive into LINK. Within 2 years you will need to hire people to help you manage all your finances.
lol I'm good
Captcha:NONGG

[Anonymous No.50544732]

>>50522959

[Anonymous No.50544747]

>>50544559
No, you're a brainlet.

[Anonymous No.50544751]

>>50544413
Quite a diversified portfolio, sure if we get a good Defi run this alts of yours will turn out well but quite skeptical about UNI though considering there are lots of other top DEXes now.

[Anonymous No.50544827]

>>50544529
so much expectations from LINK beats me how you guys cope despite being underwater.

[Anonymous No.50544865]

>>50544751
Even if there are a million DEXes UNI will stand out considering it's built on ETH and the pacesetter advantage it boasts of.

[Anonymous No.50544867]

>>50544559
Okay enjoy ur boomer gains. You have a decent stack so you’ll probably be fine regardless. I suppose my post was for the individuals that want to have power levels of money.

[Anonymous No.50544980]

>>50544867
>Okay enjoy ur boomer gains. You have a decent stack so you’ll probably be fine regardless. I suppose my post was for the individuals that want to have power levels of money.
I'm not against going up to a 10k stack

I'm not comfortable going all in. I'm already high six figs, so I don't need to be that risky.

[Anonymous No.50545001]

>>50522959
OK BOOMER

[Anonymous No.50545314]

>>50544865
UNI will stand out? Those clowns can't even solve the IL that keeps hurting their investors.

[Anonymous No.50545494]

>>50545314
Definitely a newfag cause it's no news that there's no perfect DEX.

[Anonymous No.50545497]

>>50522881
At least he can play right tackle in the NFL when LINK fails

[Anonymous No.50545779]

>>50545494
There might be no perfect DEX but i do know of Alliance Block DEX which solves the problem of IL which affects 66% of UNI V3 users.

[Anonymous No.50546040]

Syscon’s smart contracts are the base of ethereum’s value proposition and lie at the core of applications built upon the ethereum’s ecosystem. However the EVM does not skill to the level needed of Web 3.0 applications and as a product of its own architecture falls victim to unreasonable fees.

[Anonymous No.50546231]

>>50522959
Absolutely glowing

[Anonymous No.50546821]

>>50523808
Been holding since 2018 here.

[Anonymous No.50547343]

>>50544529
What will I get with 600 link?

[Anonymous No.50548308]

>>50523523
Why do you need a permission chain in a decentralized space? A Permissionless chain would be better and I think SCRT fill that spot.

[Anonymous No.50548438]

>>50522881
Same. I have 60k link and I just hope I have the willpower to make it till after smartcon

[Anonymous No.50548454]

>>50544529
Seriously anon what price do you think link will be 2 years. I’m about ready to just give up and the only thing keeping me going is buying more link each pay cheque, EVERYTHING else is secondary to that. Sometimes I’ll spoil myself and buy fancy 2 minute noodles and chicken wings. Life is hell.

[Anonymous No.50548462]

>>50522881
same.i made chainlink RPG and made like $50 off it. all my money goes to chainlink. there will be no backup because life is suffering anyway.

[Anonymous No.50548478]

>>50522881
>My entire future is in the hands of this man.
Must suck to be this fucking retarded.

[Anonymous No.50548488]

>>50522959
Based stroke survivor. Hope you get well soon.

[Anonymous No.50548496]

>>50542936
>being this fucking new

[Anonymous No.50548508]

>>50523600
XRP is so undervalued. I am waiting for them to win the suit so I can get more into the XRPL because I already see that LOX utility is good.

[Anonymous No.50548526]

>>50522959
Has anyone really been far ever as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

[Anonymous No.50548556]

>>50548454
mumbai madness...ive heard about this malaise on national geographic.

[Anonymous No.50548728]

>>50530416
Moron thinking that's ever going to happen. Chainlink got a lot of competitors that are going to do better than them if they do not gear up. Subsquid is one of such that offers better oracles and data indexing.

[Anonymous No.50549015]

>>50522881
So you're saying Chainlink is a security?
Someone call gary he's going to want to hear about this

[Anonymous No.50549745]

>>50522959
This

[Anonymous No.50549755]

>>50522959
smartest bot on /biz/

[Anonymous No.50549797]

I've never been more satisfied, doing lines of blow, smoking a joint, streaming adult swim, milking my pecker on my Chromebook in my air-conditionined room. The dual screen idea just came to me. All of this brought to you by Chainlink ticker (LINK)

[Anonymous No.50550466]

>>50548462
based