the ABSOLUTE state of LINK fud

[Anonymous No.52905577]

we're supposed to believe a 2017 OG is giving up on link, right as CCIP is confirmed to revolutionize banking through smart contracts (SWIFT) and DeFi app multi-chain interoperability (Synthetix)

These were major breadcrumbs for OG linkies, now openly discussed by the team

[Anonymous No.52905585]

token not needed

[Anonymous No.52905587]

>>52905577
link is down today

[Anonymous No.52905590]

>>52905577
>/biz
kys

[Anonymous No.52905606]

Hello my fellow OG ICO buying 2017 whale Chainlinkers. Yes the future is looking bleak for this coin... in fact I am quite fearful, uncertain and doubtful in this investment! I, as a fellow OG ICO buying 2017 whale, will be selling my link coins as well... and suggest others to do the needful and sell asap too

[Anonymous No.52905614]

imagine being an 2017 og link marine and not having a significantly higher amount of link than 7k, perhaps as much as 10x more, to sell the next top

[Anonymous No.52905620]

>>52905577
What other people do with their money is none of my business.

[Anonymous No.52905638]

>>52905614
It’s easy to be an OG with less than 7k if you’re a swinging, gambling third world ESL retard.
From their own mouth.

[Anonymous No.52905648]

>>52905590
you're telling a screenshot to kts?

[Anonymous No.52905656]

>>52905577
The absolute state of the cope

[Anonymous No.52905671]

>>52905577
Sounds like the Fud is getting to you.
>Token not needed
Oops looks like I just posted your trigger words, seethe Linkie seethe HAHAHA

[Anonymous No.52905672]

>>52905638
how do you even lose 66% to bancor? you could have PULLED OUT 66% a couple weeks ago after they forced v2 > v3

[Anonymous No.52905699]

>>52905577
CCIP has been delayed, retard its never coming out just like town crier

[Anonymous No.52905734]

>>52905699
checked, i hadn't heard thanks, sold 800 link tonight

[Anonymous No.52905855]

>>52905585
token not sneeded

[Anonymous No.52906050]

>>52905577
>/biz

Redditor detected.

[Anonymous No.52907259]

>>52905577
It should not surprise you that people are seething in denial and a false since of righteousness over link "failing", when we are in the depths of the bear market. Link is going to be the foundation of the next bullrun and the halving is just a year away. People are going to seethe for the rest of there lives getting told they're impatient if they can't wait 8 years to cash out because millennials and zoomers are the most cursed generations.

[Anonymous No.52907283]

>>52905577
im not waiting a decade for ccip
>two more weeks

[Anonymous No.52907461]

why would CCIP release increase LINK token value?

[Anonymous No.52907925]

>>52907461
It's the missing piece for the enterprise and Swift crypto abstraction layers.
Without it institutional adoption for tokenization is greatly slowed down.

[Anonymous No.52907939]

>>52907283
At this point we may not get CCIP until December next year, but if we could get DECO earlier that could jump-start a massive adoption through regulated DEFI and multiple use cases requiring a form of pryvacy.

[Anonymous No.52907965]

>>52907259
Fuck off chainlinkgod

[Anonymous No.52908020]

>>52907939
>duuuuuuuuuuude we have moarr buzzzzz words cummmin!!!!11111

Kill yourself

[Anonymous No.52908034]

>>52907925
Aren't millions of LINK tokens allocated to institutions by chainlink labs, though? Where will the buy pressure come from?

[Anonymous No.52908373]

>>52908034
From speculation like always.
Speculation on staking and the future increase of the network should have an effect.
The accumulation pattern on Chainlink is mature and cryptos are held underwater by market manipulation.

The token economics parts is unfortunately somewhat fucked up, but that was not a problem for ETH and BTC speculation until now.
Chainlink will become the token used to monetize trust.
It's clear for many in this world that the world is corrupt and needs a new base.

The problem with Chainlink is that it needs a big growth in usage to become sustainable, but I think their partnership was Swift may have been their main goal on their 5 to 10 year roadmap to make this network a success.
Everything else would be a bonus on top of it.

I haven't forgotten the use case for derivative tokenization.
Imagine if trillions in bonds were secured through a blockchain and transparently exchangeable.
The derivative market is another magnitude bigger.

This would be the real reason to use staking on nodes because you don't want to get scammed during the execution of a smart contract.
Corona delayed everything.

[Anonymous No.52908934]

>>52908020
Don't you ever get tired of being mentally ill, dude poster?

[Anonymous No.52908944]

>>52905577
>2017
>OG
How new are you?

[Anonymous No.52908949]

Yeah guys partnership with swift, tesla, microsoft, apple, the federal reserve, and WEF, the IMF, NATO, all governments just confirmed!
>5.90$
>-8%

[Anonymous No.52910116]

>>52908949
But it’s up 3500% since ICO

[Anonymous No.52910134]

>>52910116
What kind of sad pathetic cope is this?

Half a decade has passed and it’s trading at $6 you dumb faggot get a grip on reality, the fact that it crashed to rank 24 is enough to prove its a shitcoin

[Anonymous No.52910139]

Reminder for linkies

[Anonymous No.52910159]

>>52905577
>ccip is around the corner and you're selling???
staking, ccip and enterprise adoption layer were "right around the corner" back in January, I am NOT falling for any more carrot dangling psy ops, I've sold most of my stack at double digits and I intent to sell the rest of them if it ever pumps again
fuck you
t. 2018 OG

[Anonymous No.52910163]

>>52905577
>>52905614
>>52907259
>>52910139
I only have 100k Link which is nowhere near enough to actually make it.

All these Linklets with 10k stacks singing about 1k eoy are starting to piss me off with their propaganda. It was a joke and they are actually believing it and causing FOMO in newfags preventing the dump. Link is only going to $20 max. Right now I might make 2MM before tax on that, but tax will take a big chunk out of that then inflation will fucking ruin me over the next decade.

Even if I chuck the 600K into a dividend stock that pays out well and I get 60k a year of it, it's not enough to beat inflation unless I basically live in poverty as a neet and keep my wagecuck job in the meantime so I don't have to sell any retirement Link. In 10 years that 80k a year will feel like 20k a year. You need a minimum of 10MM, but more likely 15MM to make it. The upper predictions for Link were about $80 but that was made during the bullrun of last year, and it assumed that the overall crypto market cap would still be expanding and BTC would go on to 1MM a Bitcoin and that we would be in a full blown crypto FOMO hype bubble when mainnet came out and we got our price singularity. All of that isn't going to happen.

[Anonymous No.52910474]

>>52910139
>locked tokens
>exit liquidity
There seems to be a correlation between smuggies who use ":)" and low iq, anyone notice the same?

[Anonymous No.52910537]

>>52910159
i love how this low iq piece of shit adds that he's a "2018 OG" like anyone's going to believe him or that he isn't on his 5th 1pbtid this thread

[Anonymous No.52910581]

>>52910139
>>52907965
>>52907283
>>52905699
>>52905585
>>52910134
i'm an actual OG with 150k link and about 60% locked, guess what faggots? we are smarter than you. we will never sell our link just because faggots like you guys keep spamming your retarded takes on chainlink.
those who know, know.
this whole market shat the bed equally for everybody, and you guys are as retarded as any other mother fucker holding any crypto, the shitcoins you guys are supporting will all eventually get roped, the only survivors that will be left are us.
we already made it with link, and staking has just given us more passive income to be more comfy.
you guys are the pajeets of biz, pretty sure you are still waging cucks sucking on mister shekelberg dick.
stay poor fags, and yeah, don't listen to us, back then we helped eachothers here, now biz has become filled woth trannies that don't contribute anything. this is the biz you fags have created, and this is the biz you trannies lurk in all day.

because of faggots like you, YOU will never find the next precious crypto that will make you rich like us. all what you guys are" doing, is making us despise you fags, and not share any alpha with fags like you. good job you did yourself a solid.

[Anonymous No.52910591]

>>52910581
Enjoy hodling to zero

[Anonymous No.52910599]

>>52910581
COPE COPE COPE blah blah blah

Not reading that shit you dumb bagholder

[Anonymous No.52910605]

>>52910591
>Enjoy hodling to zero

[Anonymous No.52910637]

>>52910599
exactly my point
like i said in the post ur not reading:
>now biz has become filled woth trannies that don't contribute anything.

[Anonymous No.52910651]

>>52905577
>my life could have actually been decent
Pfffft.

This is one of the most torturing thoughts you could ever have and it’s completely useless. This is your fate, it was always your fate. There was never another option. You wouldn’t have done jack shit, there is no “other choice”, fucking goofballs.

[Anonymous No.52910654]

Chainlink has outperformed ETH over the last twelve months plus Chainlink staking offers a higher rate of interest on top of that we will get airdrops.
You just win

[Anonymous No.52910673]

>>52910474
well he, unlike you understands what's happening. he might not use the right fancy words that convince you to still hold on to this scam but the actual concept of what is happening he has understood. you on the other hand are a midwit that doesn't understand fundamental concepts and latch on to fancy words.

[Anonymous No.52910677]

>>52910654
Chainshit is down 92% against ETH

[Anonymous No.52910692]

>>52910677
It’s outperformed Eth over the last 12 months. Cope

[Anonymous No.52910694]

>>52908373
>held underwater by market manipulation
either that, or potential investors think the whole thing is dumb and buy something else instead

[Anonymous No.52910717]

>>52910673
By your definition he is the midwit trying to latch on to fancy while obviously not understanding the fundamental concept behind it (exit liquidity). Interesting how you would try to turn that around on me.

Liquidity is per definition liquid. Tokens locked in a staking contract are not liquid. If you understood what he is saying, perhaps you both communicate on the same retard frequency.

[Anonymous No.52910765]

>>52910717
>NOOOOOO HE USED THE WORD WRONG
>THEREFORE HIS ARGUMENT IS INVALID
but they did give him (more) exit liquidity because he now has a guarantee that he doesn't have to compete with 25 million other tokens that could potentially be sold on the market. again, you latch onto some words like the midwit you are while being too stupid to understand what he actually (and obviously) means.

[Anonymous No.52910795]

My Link rewards are higher than the average Indian salary. Really make you think

[Anonymous No.52910804]

>>52910765
>>NOOOOOO HE USED THE WORD WRONG
>>THEREFORE HIS ARGUMENT IS INVALID
Yes, that is usually how it works when the word used has no bearing on your actual argument.

>but they did give him (more) exit liquidity because he now has a guarantee that he doesn't have to compete with 25 million other tokens that could potentially be sold on the market.
Someone has to be buying for there to be exit liquidity. Linkies buying dips are exit liquidity in this argument, not tokens locked up in the stake contract
>b-but that's what I... I mean he meant!
Tough luck, try to not be a logiclet next time. Sorry to ruin you epic screencap bud

[Anonymous No.52910835]

>>52910804
>screencapping my own posts
pathetic
just keep coping stinkie

[Anonymous No.52910845]

>>52910835
>no argument
Das rite. Not so smug anymore are we.

[Anonymous No.52910848]

>>52910845
>arguing with a retard
no thanks

[Anonymous No.52910896]

>>52910848
>stops arguing after getting btfo
Loser

[Anonymous No.52910925]

>>52910677
i held through all the chainlink dumps, that's why i'm rich and you're a poorfag pajeet.
in 2018 i held through the sibis dump
>1.2$ to 20 cents
held through the linktober
>60 cents to 17 cents
held through the smartcon #1 pump
>20 $ to 6$
held through the covid dump
held through the ukraine dump
held through the ftx dump

this will continue for forever i'm never selling because the chainlink team is constantly innovating and building and k know that in 50 years they will still be here.

the only loser i see here is you and your discoed tranny friends that are spamming this thread, you guys will stay poor forever because you have the determination of a goldfish.

[Anonymous No.52910951]

>>52910925
>held through the ftx dump
This really makes me upset, link finally broke a downtrend on the btc and eth pair and was rocketing past the market until SBF ruined everything.

[Anonymous No.52910961]

>>52905638
Not an excuse. I'm from Uruguay. Poorfag that put his entire life savings in link in 2017. Got a 50k plus stack that only moved for staking. They are just coping

[Anonymous No.52910962]

>>52910951
They nuked everything to stop it. First it was suez canal ship, covid, war in ukraine, 3AC, blockfi, - whatever - whenever Link was breaking out something like that happened. Instead of being at $250 at the start of next bull run and running up to $10k+ it'll be $5-6 and will run to $100-250 max. Shits totally fucked.

[Anonymous No.52910994]

>>52910692
why do link shills always resort to blatant lies?

[Anonymous No.52911009]

>>52910994
To cope and lie to other anons

[Anonymous No.52911038]

>>52910994
>0.004673 > 0.005077
>t. 2018 OG

[Anonymous No.52911068]

>>52911038
are you retarded? he claimed it has outperformed eth YTD

[Anonymous No.52911082]

>>52911068
>last 12 months
>YTD
Not going to call you a retard, but you might want to brush up on your reading comprehension.

[Anonymous No.52911134]

Btc down 63.88% ytd
Eth down 69.61% ytd
Link down 67.25% yd
Cope

[Anonymous No.52911531]

The truth is that Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/ back last month during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth.

Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons.

Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story.

The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes.

In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

[Anonymous No.52912503]

>>52905577
>right as CCIP is confirmed to revolutionize banking through smart contracts (SWIFT) and DeFi app multi-chain interoperability (Synthetix)

CCIP literally doesnt exist you stupid nigger.

[Anonymous No.52912518]

>>52910537
>>52910537
absolutely nothing he said is wrong, though.

[Anonymous No.52913057]

>>52905577
checked. nothing ever happens. crypto mainstream does not care about anything chainlink does. ccip and deco are not guaranteed to do anything. chainlink have waited so long testing

[Anonymous No.52913107]

>>52905577
yes its completely believable
i too am an OG marine and I also have given up
sergey inviting sbf to smartcon was the straw that broke the camels back
all of us OGs are selling actually
many of us dumped at the top and we all live in the metaverse now.
we have virtual sex, in the metaverse, with 10/10s and laugh all day dumping on you stinkies
in fact I just sold 100k right now

[Anonymous No.52913325]

>>52910581
Don't bother engaging with them anon. The people who fud link hold it themselves. They probably have their entire stack staked. They just want to keep non-autists out and keep the price low so they can keep accumulating.

[Anonymous No.52913332]

>>52905577
You should ONLY buy link when strong fud is being spread.
Everybody knows this.
Link is just a json parser after all.

[Anonymous No.52913349]

>>52905577
YOU CAN'T MAKE FUN OF MY SHITTY TOKEN
10000 EOY!!!!1111

[Anonymous No.52913490]

>>52905577
It is pretty crazy though. I turned 12 this weekend and was reflecting on my life and this rollercoaster we call crypto. I've been holding LINK nearly half my life now. Half my life! I don't know how much longer I can live this way.

[Anonymous No.52915327]

>>52905587
I saw and killed myself earlier because today's price is all that matters.

[Anonymous No.52917064]

>>52905577
>CCIP is confirmed to revolutionize banking through smart contracts (SWIFT) and DeFi app multi-chain interoperability (Synthetix)
No way! Really? Let me check the price!
>-2%

[Anonymous No.52917090]

>>52905577
every 2017 link OG sold their stack at 30-50 and made it
why the fuck is anyone still holding this shit
you know we made up all that 4th industrial revolution shit to get normies to pump our bags right

[Anonymous No.52917809]

>>52917090
yup, we collectively wrote the book. It was a a hilarious thread. Some hilarious anon made up the pen name "Klaus Schwab" and then we crowdfunded and got it published. Man, 2018 /biz/ was the golden era

[Anonymous No.52917859]

>>52905577
This is why they offered Early Access lock-in, anon. Anyone who's a real marine locked in. If you're still checking the price... if you CARE about the price in the dead-zone between the moment you willingly locked and ~18 months from then when the unlock allows you to make decisions again... you're being irrational, or you have unstaked tokens (oh yea, that's irrational.)

It's gunna get rough for those fuckers, man. This recession is gunna see some rope. Our forefathers had some hardships before the great depression. They knew work. These poor summer children are gunna drop like flies in a sandstorm; and, the night before it's all over? That's the night the bullrun begins. (By definition, near enough.) That's the only night that matters - unlock will happen.

And guess what the Early Access see
>Staked link.
>Where link belongs.
>Excellent.

[Anonymous No.52917876]

tnn

[Anonymous No.52918876]

>>52905734
>same birthday as Kike
What does it mean??? Oh nonono bros not like this

[Anonymous No.52918878]

>>52910134
wen 6.66?

[Anonymous No.52919000]

>>52905577
I did buy a 5-fig stack in 2017. There are two aspects here: 1. discontent; 2. selling. While I am extremely fucking demoralised, selling now doesn't seem intelligent. For others, this might just be an opportune time to place a different bet, but I figure the improvements on the fundamental side should appeal to long-term LINK holders as the bull case was always predicated on FA.

That said, pretending like it's not demoralising to be ~12x up after 5 years is a ludicrous cope. Those who can't understand why people feel this way were likely among those smart enough to have taken profits. Not everyone was. For anyone who waited for staking to drop earlier than the 31 Dec meme after Sergey's announcement too would be understandably pissed. Rethinking a position because of that is also understandable, and this effort to try to dismiss those people as always having ulterior motives because they decided to sell is simply extreme denial.

[Anonymous No.52919578]

>>52910962
I completely believe this. The goal Chainlink is aiming to complete is revolutionary to the entire world.

[Anonymous No.52920186]

>>52905577
I've known about LINK since the beginning but left /biz/ during the bear market and didn't buy till late 2019. I wonder how different my life would be had I not worked on privacy coins instead of smart-contracts, I guess I had more faith in humanity back then too.

[Anonymous No.52920306]

ICO chad here. I had 11k LINK, sold 3k at $33, staked 3k and the rest is there if there is a pump. If not, I'll stake them too

comfy

[Anonymous No.52920349]

>>52920306
What else are you doing with your life, anon?

[Anonymous No.52920526]

>>52920349
Why does this question kill threads? Did you guys not learn to play an instrument or other nice skill along the way? You can't buy all experiences.

[Anonymous No.52920778]

>>52920526
dude join a band lmao

[Anonymous No.52920791]

>>52920526
you going to need money buy free time to learn

[Anonymous No.52920812]

>>52920778
>dude join a band lmao
I did and I write music regularly and it's awesome just like its awesome you bought LINK early
>>52920791
I'm a tech guy making 120k+, money doesn't buy experience. Same goes for music, you can't buy your way into skills. I find connections are very important, something I find lacking because I hang out too much on here with you faggots.

[Anonymous No.52920827]

>>52920812
*sigh* make a trip bro and post all about your experiences since you are obviously a better more powerful individual than the rest of (((us)))

[Anonymous No.52920849]

>>52920827
I never said I was, the timeline played out as it was meant to. Don't worry, we're in it together.

[Anonymous No.52920853]

the absolute state of the holders

[Anonymous No.52920883]

>>52920849
sure sure

[Anonymous No.52920890]

>>52920883
Okay maybe I did say I was better than you, now what?

[Anonymous No.52920910]

>>52920890
you should make a trip, gather followers then lead them to twitter (((where all the good posters are now)))

[Anonymous No.52920926]

>>52920910
They say 4chan is pissing into an ocean of piss, I say twitter is diarrhea-ing into an ocean of diarrhea. Whatever sickass reach I had went away in 2017. It's all about maintaining the brand to be just edgy enough to still get reach.

[Anonymous No.52920938]

>>52920910
>>52920926
Also, create sock-puppet accounts and manufacture consent and social approval, that's what the demonic faggots do all day at social media HQ.

[Anonymous No.52920984]

>>52905585
>Angoram for: Odd Keen Teen Not
Nice try glowie

[Anonymous No.52921021]

>>52913332

[Anonymous No.52921417]

helo sers am og link holder 7 years ico buy
<chainlink stake down 999999% sers
<stake 7k link coins you get 0.000001 link a week sers
<inflarion apr negativ 1000000000% sers
<timelock 99999999 years sers
haha lmao lol even sers.

[Anonymous No.52921468]

>>52910951
>link finally broke a downtrend on the btc and eth pair and was rocketing past the market until SBF ruined everything.
Yeah, pic related is when BTC "decided" to crash after the FTX collapse.

Some massive black swan always happens whenever Link moves.

[Anonymous No.52921473]

At some point there will be a sudden liquidity shortage with Link, as the market realises its potential value and rushes to accumulate. This will be coupled with the vast majority of the supply being staked forever, forcing the price to dizzying heights in a relatively short space of time. Fudders know this, even more acutely than most, and their sole purpose is to dissuade YOU from accumulating while they and their cohorts do just that. As soon as this event occurs, the fud will evaporate, with perhaps only one or two ignorant useful idiots still at it. Trying to time this event is playing with fire, and those who delayed, swung, or bought the fud will regret it for the rest of their natural lives.

[Anonymous No.52921486]

>>52905577
You can never own too little LINK. I have 0 but I wish I had less

[Anonymous No.52921655]

>>52921473
Why do the elites want to kill me for my link?

[Anonymous No.52921667]

>>52920186
Just got into prifi tokens, wish I had long before now.

[Anonymous No.52921689]

>$5.99
When are you guys going to start buying? $5?

[Anonymous No.52921709]

>>52921473
Im a big believer that Link is following the usual btc/eth/amazon etc pullback after the initial fomo. Although I bear in mind that its not exactly a cryptocurrency its more like a 50/50 mix of crypto/company. There is a lot more risk involved than your average crypto

[Anonymous No.52921940]

>>52921709
How would a blend of company and crypto carry more risk

[Anonymous No.52922142]

>>52910962
The truth is that these events are the actions of a dying system that they know is slated to be replaced by systems like Chainlink. The current economic and social system in the West is on the verge of collapse, everything that's happening is deliberately designed to extract as much wealth as possible for the top 0.1% as humanly possible before the system collapses and has to be replaced. The systems replacing it will need to be trustless because we already tried trusting the institutions and this is where we've ended up.

[Anonymous No.52922203]

>>52922142
>and this is where we've ended up.
With a functional and optimal civilisation. Chainlink cultists are so hyperbolic, there is no improvement smart contracts can have over legacy systems. Chainlink is for securing price feeds in defi, nothing else.

[Anonymous No.52922314]

>>52922203
Did your mother drink alcohol when she was pregnant with you and your dead twin?

[Anonymous No.52922335]

>>52922203
>there is no improvement smart contracts can have over legacy systems
Oof, better run and tell virtually every major financial and governmental institution in the world.

[Anonymous No.52922377]

>>52922335
>>52922314
You cultists just prove my point. Give me just ONE example where a chainlinked smart contract improves upon a system we have in the real world.

[Anonymous No.52922386]

>>52922377
Why are you asking us?
Go ask virtually every major financial and governmental institution in the world.

[Anonymous No.52922407]

>>52922386
Are they all balls deep in chainlink? Must be why the price is so high. Government and financial institutions just rushed to fill that early access staking pool.

[Anonymous No.52922424]

>>52922407
Honey look, the goalpost moving company's here.

[Anonymous No.52922456]

>>52922424
>"institutions want LINK!!!"
>so why apparently nobody is accumulating?
>"hurrrrrrrr that's moving the goalposts durrrr lelelele trololol"

[Anonymous No.52922480]

>>52922456
The argument was about smart contracts being better than legacy systems.
But fuddie had to change it to "Link number low".

And there are millions of reasons why financial and governmental institutions can't just buy speculative assets.

[Anonymous No.52922509]

>>52922480
Financial and government institutions have been all over BTC because that had relevance at the time.

[Anonymous No.52922527]

>>52922509
lol no they haven't.
They started offering paper BTC not long ago, and that's it.

[Anonymous No.52922539]

>>52922527
what's your proof that government and financial institutions are interested then, if they're not buying?

[Anonymous No.52922801]

>>52922539
congrats, you just destroyed him

[Anonymous No.52922896]

>>52905606
kek based and robust. i will now be not selling my link. very good sir, needful done

[Anonymous No.52923023]

>>52917090
To retarded to understand that we can see what’s in all wallets. Whales have never sold and have only added to their positions.
Rent free

[Anonymous No.52923105]

>>52922377
The joke of t+3 settlement in stocks

[Anonymous No.52923110]

>>52920186
web3 tokens are based anon

[Anonymous No.52923119]

>>52923023
prove it. there's a lot of baseless claims and retardation from link cultists.

[Anonymous No.52923176]

>>52922539
Is this supposed to be a joke?
Virtually every financial/government institution is working on smart contracts for tokenized assets, CBDCs, and their interoperability.

[Anonymous No.52923182]

>>52923176
where do they explicitly write about chainlink being used for all of this.

[Anonymous No.52923190]

>>52923176
I've read the same hopium posts in cultist threads and read documents about planned CBDC rollouts but never once have I seen any mention of chainlink's role.

[Anonymous No.52923209]

>>52923182
Firstly, the discussion was about smart contracts in general, not specifically Chainlink.

Secondly, lol

[Anonymous No.52923242]

>>52923209
>Firstly, the discussion was about smart contracts in general, not specifically Chainlink.
look who's moving the goalposts now, we're in a chainlink cultist thread talking specifically about chainlink based smart contracts. Of course everything we talk about would relate to chainlink, I've even mentioned it in pretty much all my posts from the beginning

[Anonymous No.52923253]

>>52923242
>look who's moving the goalposts now
This discussion started when you said "there is no improvement smart contracts can have over legacy systems".

>>52922335

[Anonymous No.52923255]

>>52923209
nice screenshot of a quote from a chainlink labs member. Do you have any more details on the nature of the partnership between chainlink and SWIFT or about how far development of CCIP has come along. I recall Sergey saying it would be ready by the end of the year and he always keeps his word.

[Anonymous No.52923261]

>>52923255
>chainlink labs member
Anon, I...

[Anonymous No.52923267]

>>52923261
Whoops my mistake, didn't scroll down. Someone paid heavily by chainlink labs to market their product.

[Anonymous No.52923287]

>>52922203
You need to take your meds if you believe any of that drivel, we're basically living in a kleptocracy.

[Anonymous No.52923289]

>>52923267

[Anonymous No.52923301]

>>52923255
>2 hours and almost a dozen posts just to rage at linkies
>just recycling the same "scs won't be used for anything" argument that has been consistently shut down since 2018 because hes here in bad faith / purely to waste time as per usual
The amount of pain that buying and staking link causes to actual brown people being paid to spam link fud on biz is enough of a reason for me to buy desu

[Anonymous No.52923308]

>>52923287
>we're basically living in a kleptocracy.
hyperbolic drivel.
>>52923289
You still have yet to answer what has specifically been built or is being built by this partnership between chainlink labs and SWIFT. This partnership has lasted for around 4 years, what do either party have to show for it?

[Anonymous No.52923317]

>>52923301
>The amount of pain that buying and staking link causes to actual brown people being paid to spam link fud
Sorry cultist, chainlink isn't important enough for people to be paid to post on this shithole. You are at $5 and down 90% against ETH. Chainlink is irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.52923328]

>>52923308
>institutions don't want smart contracts
>ok they do, but they don't want Chainlink
>ok they do, but you can't prove that they've really built what they said

You're a goalpost moving machine.

[Anonymous No.52923339]

>>52923242
Yeah, gotta give >>52923253 here the points buddy. You moved the goalpost of that discussion with this post >>52923182. Instead of engaging the point made you deflected by saying "but what about muh Chainlink explicitly"

Your whole way of arguing in this thread is obviously in bad faith.
>governments and institutions not rushing to fill early access staking pool of this obscure smartcontract product that is on its first iteration?
>Must be a shit product then
Lol, lmao even

[Anonymous No.52923378]

>>52923339
>obscure smartcontract product
I thought you cultists said that chainlink is the backbone of smart contract infrastructure and they would never have any real world use without it. Hardly seems obscure. Also I never said that chainlink was a shit product.

[Anonymous No.52923405]

>>52905577
WTF YOU CAN'T JUST BUY LINK FUCKING STINKNIGGER CHAINSHITTER FUCKCKCK YOU I'M ABOUT TO BURST A FUCKING BLOOD VESSEL AND I JUST PUNCHED ANOTHER HOLE IN MY WALL THIS IS ALL YOUR FAULT YOU PIECE OF SHIT FUCKING BHENCHOD MOTHERSHIT

[Anonymous No.52923408]

>>52923328
No you're a goalpost machine, answer my question. What has been the result of the SWIFT-LINK partnership?

[Anonymous No.52923422]

>>52923408
>he still doesn't know
it's too late for you

[Anonymous No.52923436]

>>52923378
I knew you would pounce on that. Didn't we just determine that governments and institutions have only just began dipping their toes in the smartcontract space? With this in mind, wouldn't you agree that a platform aiming to improve and expand smart contract capabilities would be even more unknown to those same governments and institutions?

Chainlink is the oracle industry standard. It is also still very obscure and under the radar.

[Anonymous No.52923479]

>>52923436
>I knew you would pounce on that.

[Anonymous No.52923504]

>>52923378
>try to convince boomer companies in the 60s that computers are the future
>anon is confused why boomer companies aren't immediately using the internet

[Anonymous No.52923521]

>>52923504
false equivalence, institutions and governments were immediately interested in the internet even from the early stages of its conception. The same is untrue for smart contracts.

[Anonymous No.52923540]

>>52923479
>deflects
How surprising.

[Anonymous No.52923542]

>>52905577
link is a scam. take your shill nonsense elsewhere

[Anonymous No.52923573]

>>52923521
I specifically mentioned companies. I thought you already conceded that governments are interested in smartcontracts through CBDCs
>nobel prize winning sentiment on the internet in 1998

[Anonymous No.52923629]

>>52923521
>The same is untrue for smart contracts.
Swift was working on smart contracts in 2016, a year after ETH launched.
You have no idea what's going on.

[Anonymous No.52923658]

>>52923479
lmao just go back to making fun of the price homie
these stinkies may be getting poorer everday but they are running circles around you in this thread

[Anonymous No.52923756]

>>52923479
17 posts by this seething faggot lmao

[Anonymous No.52923776]

>>52923629
All this interest and chainlink is still 5 dollars, kek

[Anonymous No.52923853]

>>52910139
Wtf? I have 20k so 13k is for exit quit if price is increasing rapidly. It would fool to go all in staking.

[Anonymous No.52925135]

What's the current LINK revenue? Can you quantify it?

[Anonymous No.52925236]

>>52925135
It's between 7 and 8, by conservative estimates

[Anonymous No.52925251]

>>52923776
>All this interest and chainlink is still 5 dollars, kek
why do you care

[Anonymous No.52925291]

>>52921468
So they collapsed FTX just because of LINK? Linkies really need their own shizo general.

[Anonymous No.52925327]

>>52925291
The crash in that pic happened two days after FTX started falling apart.

But remember that the same guy who triggered FTX also made Link crash to $0.0001 on his exchange.

[Anonymous No.52925940]

...and then he said LINK is going to $1000.

[Anonymous No.52925986]

>>52910163
Uh sir it was already at 20, why didn't you take profits then?

[Anonymous No.52926051]

>>52923378
>you cultists

[Anonymous No.52926065]

should I sell a bit now?

[Anonymous No.52926068]

>>52923756
He must be having a slow day, it's usually twice that many.

[Anonymous No.52926652]

>>52926065
If you weren't stupid enough to lock your tokens up for staking, then yes, sell it all.

[Anonymous No.52927423]

>>52907939
The amount of data breaches in Australia since they passed laws for businesses to disclose them is phenomenal. Deco is needed. Exposing my information to philipines call center workers is ridiculous.

[Anonymous No.52927437]

>>52926652
Should i happily leave my 60k Link tokens staked and earning 4.75% in Link or should I listen to reams of fud from people like you and whine about what a mistake I made?
Genuine question.

[Anonymous No.52927455]

>>52927437
If you staked then sorry to say you're a genuine retard. People like me have your financial well being in mind. If you listened to us you wouldn't have lost so much money >>52927437