NUCLEAR HAPPENING

[Anonymous No.53776843]

IT'S OVER WTF COME IN HERE MOTHERFUCKERS SERGEY NAZAROV JUST FOUND DEAD IN HIS APARTMENT.

https://www.coindesk.com/people/2023/02/19/chainlink-founder-sergey-nazarov-found-dead

[Anonymous No.53776848]

>SERGEY NAZAROV WAS JUST FOUND DEAD IN HIS APARTMENT TRYING TO SUCK HIS OWN DICK.

[Anonymous No.53776852]

holy fuck

[Anonymous No.53776853]

HOLY SHIT

[Anonymous No.53776860]

They assassinated Sergey to stop LINK from pumping. Crazy.

[Anonymous No.53776862]

>>53776843
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.53776864]

>>53776843
Yeah that's fake news

[Anonymous No.53776867]

>>53776848
The absolute madlad, that's physically impossible

[Anonymous No.53776893]

am i a sociopath that i wanted this to be the black swan event that meant i could slurp cheapies?

[Anonymous No.53776966]

>its real
WHAT THE FUCK

[Anonymous No.53776973]

>>53776843
Ari usurped the throne

[Anonymous No.53776980]

>>53776843
If Sergay was dead, then all of us would be called togeather into the heavens to join him. We're still here so surely Sergay is still among the living.

[Anonymous No.53776988]

>>53776843
BIG MAC OVERDOSE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.53776998]

>>53776893
LINK isn't cheap til it's literally like 40c
There's people on this board that got in for pennies

Remember that LINK retards experienced a 5000x and still think their shit didn't moon, that's why they are retarded. Some of the wildest claims I have seen, people saying LINK can hit $100 and etc, not realizing that fundamentally it would have to have the highest market cap of any other crypto due to the small fractional nature of Chainlink. Getting to $200 Chainlink is talking over a quadrillion dollar market cap, because people don't seem to understand that, if the baseline "IPO" of the "share" is in such a tiny tiny fractional nature (think any coin with lots of "zeros") that means that the market cap display will be reflective of the fractional nature, you could pump SHIB to 1 quadrillion dollar market cap and it still wouldn't be $1.

So that being said, an actual real value deal of Chainlink is under $1, there's people who are still sitting on massive massive gains and those as far as im concerned anyone buying at these prices is just buying bags

Verification not required

[Anonymous No.53777009]

>>53776998
Here is you

[Anonymous No.53777012]

>>53776998
oh i give no shit about link. i just want eth, polygon, or btc low again.

[Anonymous No.53777015]

>>53776998
If chainlinks going to be a strict utility token and not a securities lawsuit waiting to happen anon, the value buy is actually more like under a penny, given the extremely limited actual volume that will be moving through the nodes.

[Anonymous No.53777018]

>>53776843
This is bullish for link, no more weekly dumps!

[Anonymous No.53777020]

>>53776998
Wow. This makes absolute no fucking sense. Congratulations. Also, this is straight up lies. Faggot motherfucker.

Btw
>fudding his own bags

[Anonymous No.53777032]

>>53777009
Nah man link was a great deal about 5 and a half dollars ago
Now? Why?

[Anonymous No.53777034]

>>53776843
Who?

[Anonymous No.53777062]

>>53776843
>it's real
>https://nitter.net/BigMacAttack/status/867530986753098675309

[Anonymous No.53777080]

>>53777020
Uh, it’s literally quantitatively correct. If chainlinks dream is picking up cross chain oracle volume from swift, the current numbers for Swifts revenue suggest that the token, if used as a utility token, has a value below 10 cents, likely below 1 cent more realistically

[Anonymous No.53777082]

omfg it's real

[Anonymous No.53777096]

>>53776843
I don't know who this guy was. I've been holding Chainlink faithfully since 2017—does this mean I should sell, master?

[Anonymous No.53777124]

>>53777080
Why? I don't get it.

[Anonymous No.53777128]

The burgers finally caught up with him

[Anonymous No.53777136]

man wasnt he only like 34? crazy...

[Anonymous No.53777153]

>>53777124
Because the volume for institutions using specifically cross border on chain payments will be horrendously low. Using current numbers they will likely pick up less than 10MM in revenue a year likely, don’t forget the existing swift infrastructure will still be around and cheaper. And that’s not going to translate directly revenue into crypto demand, only a portion of it will be for the oracle staking fee. And to top it off this is at literal minimum 3 years away, likely 5-7 years on a realistic roll out timeline. The token will have like, maybe a million or so in buying power yearly. With a billion tokens.

[Anonymous No.53777214]

>>53776843
F

[Anonymous No.53777241]

>>53776998
Nigger your math is fucked. Are you using rupees or something?

[Anonymous No.53777243]

>>53777153
This is not true. In fact, you just made this up. Institutions won't use decentralized oracles just to make cross border on chain payments. They'll use to feed smart contracts regarding tokenized assets on a blockchain (permissionless or permissioned). They are primarily interested in the transformation or digitalization of traditional finance, and in my opinion, this is what matters. BTC or niggercoin or niggerNFT are very cringe and useless. But smart contracts and tokenized assets are the real deal.

If I misunderstood you, please, try to explain your point again.

[Anonymous No.53777297]

>>53776843
Fuck. Linkies can’t catch a break.

[Anonymous No.53777329]

>>53776848
holy FUCK. They will truly stop at nothing to stop LINK from pumping. RIP sweet prince

[Anonymous No.53777400]

>>53777243
Except smart contracts on a mutable chain don’t need decentralized oracles that charge them for staking with each request, as a mutable contract can avoid any bad actor data and centralized data providers already provide perfect data in light of that. There’s zero incentive to pay for a decentralized oracle, meaning it will have to be competitive with existing solutions, I.E. regular STP -> matching and settlement from traditional financial institutions which is already automated for financial contracts, or centralized oracles, to compete with regular swift pricing because if the cost is prohibitive against traditional nearly instantaneous settlement there’s no point

I don’t think your rebuttal actually addresses the problem, in short.

[Anonymous No.53777514]

>>53776843
He ate himself to death!

[Anonymous No.53777634]

>>53777400
So you are saying that decentralized oracles are useless outside defi? And what about CCIP? Also, what is STP?

[Anonymous No.53777715]

>>53777634
Yes, and if we want to get into it I think there’s no possible way to decentralize “Defi” enough to not make oracles vulnerable to centralized parties anyway, making them functionally useless

CCIP can be done on a chain by chain basis without decentralized oracles for much cheaper. After all, what is MT202 to Swift DLT except a CCIP from real life to the chain

STP stands for “Straight through processing”, it is the systems banks setup so swifts can be automatically accepted and actioned based on the fields and information within a swift, so banks, inter banks, and software collaborate to Straight Through Process a swift into internal matching systems to automatically action the corresponding settlement or position updates given the payment, I.E. you receive a payment and automatically close out a position in your accounting software, you receive a margin payment and automatically enter into your margin and accounting systems, ect.

[Anonymous No.53777913]

>>53777715
Interesting. Not selling, but it's good being aware of other perspectives.

[Anonymous No.53777955]

>>53777913
Sure, never said you had to. Just be aware if the investing environment changes the quantitative value of the chainlink token as a function of utility is under 10 cents, likely under 1 cent, massive losses are possible.

[Anonymous No.53777992]

>>53777955
I still don't get this brutal change in value as a function of utility. Explain to me like I'm five, please.

[Anonymous No.53778043]

>>53777992
Buyers and sellers create market places, returns of capital such as dividends and buybacks and voting rights give equity value, in lieu of these the team has decided to implement utility to return capital, predicted return of capital is extremely low, using average values for most appreciation in your capital over time you get this really low price because it makes no money and thus has no inherent value.

Anything else you need help with?

[Anonymous No.53778107]

HAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAH dear god when it all crashes there are gonna be suicides

[Anonymous No.53778112]

>>53778043
I see. Thank you for sharing your point of view. Btw what crypto you hold?

[Anonymous No.53778121]

>>53777913
>”not selling”
>he repeats his learning cult saying in a moment of exteme nervousness, starting to realize he fell for the grift

Very interesting>>53777913

[Anonymous No.53778153]

>>53778121
I mean, I made over 5k with this small rally. Everything can crumble eventually but you still can speculate. I'm just waiting for us to test that $9, maybe I will consider selling there.

[Anonymous No.53778169]

>>53778112
I really haven’t traded any crypto since 2017-2018, I mostly trade stocks, but unfortunately I am not allowed to trade anything right now as it’s prohibited by the financial services firm I work for, due to front running rules.

Anything else you would like to know?

[Anonymous No.53778184]

>>53778169
Very kind of you anon, that's all.

[Anonymous No.53778255]

>>53778169
i have a few:
Are you assblaster?
Could you do a dedicated thread undressing Link’s so called “use case”

[Anonymous No.53778265]

Holy shit did chainlinkgod really raid his minecraft server?!?! Looks like based zach finally pulled off his plan

[Anonymous No.53778286]

>>53776843
Wow the article said Serg committed suicide. No way he killed himself. This shit is INSANE.

[Anonymous No.53778310]

>>53778184
>>53778255
Retards falling for a chatgpt copy/paste lol

[Anonymous No.53778395]

BASED CHAINLINKGOD FINALLY SNAPPED!!!! NUCLEOR HAPPENING!!!

[Anonymous No.53778465]

>>53778255
Nope, not ass blaster
Eventually at some point I will make another thread yes, as I feel bringing my original concerns to the community created further and more accurate points to dissect on the chainlink project, that will not be today though as I would like to do the thread right like I felt I did last time, which takes an effort I don’t have the time to dedicate to right now

[Anonymous No.53778476]

>>53778465
I hope you make the thread, anon.

[Anonymous No.53778504]

>>53778310
Nope, sorry. I am humanANON, I can respond to any query as I have a brain. You could maybe make the argument I’m a poop robot though, as I automatically turn food into feces

[Anonymous No.53778711]

>>53776843

Linkies, not like this.

[Anonymous No.53778758]

it's real

[Anonymous No.53779067]

>>53777400
i'm stoopid
are you for or against link?

[Anonymous No.53779322]

>>53779067
Well, as with any investor I’m only for or against prices.

At its current price, the chainlink token seems to be a complete scam, the project fundamentally can’t remain as described and provide a financially viable product that delivers anywhere near what it promotes on /biz/, much much less sustain anywhere near its current valuation.

However, if the token drops to below a cent and they register as a security, and the team continues to develop their seemingly working project with being an all around, centralized, oracle provider for chains/software that will use swift, I can see them growing into a nice role and taking a decent fee out of on-chain transactions for swift, all of these things would making purchasing that speculative stake in link tokens a good or maybe even great financial purchase.

[Anonymous No.53779339]

HOLY SHIT HE FINALLY RAN OUT OF HAMBURGERS