KEK LINKBAGGIES

[Anonymous No.54459353]

What’s the point of buying chainlink when ethchads always outperforms you? When will you admit vitalik was right and the token isn’t even needed, unlike eth?

[Anonymous No.54459381]

>>54459353
Esl

[Anonymous No.54459405]

>>54459381
Do you understand English?

[Anonymous No.54459513]

>>54459353
>vitalik was right and the token isn’t even needed
Vitalik said the token is indeed needed.

[Anonymous No.54459524]

>>54459513
he never said that the link token is needed broski

[Anonymous No.54459550]

>>54459524
Ye he did, literally

[Anonymous No.54459554]

>>54459513
Appeal to authority.
It doesn’t take vitaliks approval for sway the truth, token is needed whether you poofta cunts like it or not.

[Anonymous No.54459565]

>>54459550
>and uni
Kek

[Anonymous No.54459588]

>>54459550
he's talking about oracles in general faggot, nowhere does he state explicitly that the link token is needed

[Anonymous No.54459597]

>>54459554
Anon, Vitalik said the token IS needed.

>>54459565
Yeah, he's basically begging Uni to start working on external data as well, so they can compete with Chainlink.
He hates Chainlink with a burning passion, but still can't help but admit the Link token is in fact needed.

>>54459588
He literally mentions Link at the bottom of my pic you dunce.

[Anonymous No.54459605]

you know this is a link holder when they use the ETH pair no one cares about 2020 anymore grandpa

[Anonymous No.54459606]

>>54459597
as an example, he also mentions uni you absolute giga brainlet
again, there is no explicit statement of vitalik deeming the link token as needed

[Anonymous No.54459610]

>>54459606
>as an example
Yes, as an example of an oracle that needs its own token.

[Anonymous No.54459617]

>>54459610
>Yes
thanks for conceding

[Anonymous No.54459623]

>>54459617
Vitalik:
>oracles need a token, for example Link and Uni

you:
>Vitalik never said Link needed a token

You need to learn to read more better.

[Anonymous No.54459628]

>>54459623
vitalik never said that the link token is needed, yes

[Anonymous No.54459631]

>>54459628
He said oracles need a token, and explicitly states Link as an example.

[Anonymous No.54459636]

>>54459631
and uni
he does not state that the link token specifically is needed, he's talking about hypotheticals and bringing up link cause it has the biggest mcap
you tried

[Anonymous No.54459640]

>>54459636
>and uni
Yes.

[Anonymous No.54459643]

>>54459640
thanks for conceding that vitalik never explicitly stated that the link token is needed

[Anonymous No.54459654]

>>54459643
He gave Link as an example of an oracle that needs its own token

[Anonymous No.54459663]

>>54459654
yes, thanks for conceding that he did not state that the link token specifically is needed for anything

[Anonymous No.54459668]

>>54459663
Vitalik said oracles (like Link) need their own token.

[Anonymous No.54459669]

>>54459606
>>54459597

Both of you faggots need to listen.
It doesn’t matter what vitalik or any other faggot thinks of the token. It’s objectively needed.

[Anonymous No.54459678]

>>54459654
>it's the retarded shill from yesterday
quick question anon, did citi SHILL Chainlink on their 2021 report or did they simply MENTIONED it? thanks in advance.

[Anonymous No.54459680]

>>54459606
Again and again I am astounded by the utter lack of reading comprehension of grown adults on this board, not to mention the enormous misplaced confidence in their ability to parse text. Imagine calling someone a gigabrainlet when you are utterly incapable of reading a simple text such as >>54459550

>Decentralized Oracle need token because of sybil resistance
>Decentralized oracle for defi project must first and foremost be based on token with large marketcap
>Token with large marketcap... LINK and UNI

Conclusion: LINK needed (and UNI, if it was not a shitty oracle). Any other conclusion confirms your IQ to be 2 digits.

[Anonymous No.54459688]

>>54459668
but he did not say that the link token specifically is needed
we can go on and on, you're still wrong
>>54459680
seethe all you want, vitalik never said that the link token is needed, he said that oracles in general need a token

[Anonymous No.54459699]

>>54459678
>did they shill or did they mention
You can't shill without mentioning lol

>>54459688
>he did not say that the link token specifically is needed
He quite literally did. He literally mentions Link as an example of an oracle that needs a token.

[Anonymous No.54459705]

>>54459699
yes, without specifying that the link token on its current iteration is needed, it was simply an example based on mcap
sorry, you're wrong again

[Anonymous No.54459706]

Friendly reminder 90% of Link FUD comes from holders.
They're petty and hate newfags
Why should you be able to make it off their coin when they've held for so long?

[Anonymous No.54459715]

>>54459705
>it was simply an example based on mcap
And of an oracle that needs a token.

[Anonymous No.54459718]

>>54459688
>vitalik never said that the link token is needed
>he said that oracles in general need a token


>Elon never said Tesla's need engines
>he said that cars in general need engines

[sage No.54459732]

>>54459550
he's literally saying that the token should have a large mcap, thus using ETH will always be the better choice than using a low liquidity shitcoin like LINK.

[Anonymous No.54459737]

>>54459718
>red herring bs
face it, you've lost
nice self portrait btw

[Anonymous No.54459744]

>>54459699
>avoids answering cause he realized he fucked up arguing for 40pbtid that citi did not shill, now his retarded logic comes to bite him on the ass
Poetic and clear indication all LINK shills are disingenuous flipflopping faggots

[Anonymous No.54459751]

>>54459732
>using ETH will always be the better choice
Ya, he also says oracles need a token.
So yeah.

>>54459744
>>avoids answering
Answering what?
You can't shill without mentioning, so asking "did he shill or did he mention" is nonsense.

[Anonymous No.54459757]

>>54459751
>if I keep repeating the lie it'll become reality
vitalik never stated that the link token specifically is needed, cope seethe and dilate

[Anonymous No.54459765]

>>54459353
>1h chart

[Anonymous No.54459766]

>>54459757
ooof that’s desperation posting, sad pajeet. you likely won’t get your 0.02 rupees low energy posting like that. Maybe tell him to buy an ad

[Anonymous No.54459767]

>>54459757
He says oracles need a token, as a general rule.
And he specifically mentions Link as an example.

Vitalik LITERALLY says Link needs a token.

[Anonymous No.54459773]

>>54459767
then he literally says UNI is needed as well
so UNI token very much needed

[Anonymous No.54459783]

>>54459773
>then he literally says UNI is needed as well
Yes he does.

>so UNI token very much needed
That's what Vitalik says, yes.

[Anonymous No.54459792]

>>54459783
okay so why the tunnel vision with link? it's clear as day that uni is very much needed as well

[Anonymous No.54459801]

>>54459792
I have no tunnel vision.
I simply corrected OP's statement about Link specifically.

[Anonymous No.54459818]

>>54459801
yes you have, instead of presenting vitalik's entire statement of using uni and link as examples to demonstrate how oracles need tokens for sybil resistance you interpret his post as "link token needed", which is simply untrue or at the very least misleading, if link token is needed based on that post, then uni token is equally needed
tl;dr
all tokens needed

[Anonymous No.54459819]

>>54459737
>Muh red herring
Kek, you're him aren't you? >>54448885
You have a knack for misusing pretty words you learned. You also can't consider something bullish unless it SPECIFICALLY, EXPLICITLY calls Chainlink AND NO OTHER CRYPTO, by name, otherwise it's a nothingburger.
>"Citibank mentioning Oracle 115 times is not bullish, because... because they didn't mention Chainlink specifically and only in an image containing other oracles!!"
L M A O. To imagine I would run into your brainlet ass AGAIN because you lack basic reading comprehension is beyond hilarious.

>>54459801
He will keep this up all day anon. 47 posts of misdirection, lying, pil pulling and whining in the other thread. All because he can't read (and didn't sell Chainlink at the top).

[Anonymous No.54459829]

>>54459818
>if link token is needed based on that post, then uni token is equally needed
Yes.
And?

[Anonymous No.54459836]

>>54459353
Link is like India. Superpower by 2050 while keeps shitting in the street.

[sage No.54459838]

>>54459751
>Ya, he also says oracles need a token.
he says that oracles need some form of sybil-resistance. this can be done through a staking mechanism (like chainlink does). the collateral for staking must have sufficient liquidity.
to conclude that they should introduce some low liquidity shitcoin for this purpose, while the entire DeFi space uses ETH or stables as collateral is just bagholder cope.

[Anonymous No.54459849]

>>54459838
>he says that oracles need some form of sybil-resistance
He quite literally says they need a token for sybil resistance.

This discussion is about what Vitalik said, not whether he's even correct or not.

[Anonymous No.54459848]

>>54459819
>>/biz/?task=search2&ghost=&search_text=&search_subject=&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=1576189016948.jpg&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_op=all&search_del=dontcare&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=new&search_capcode=all&search_res=post
are you permanently stationed here to discipline "fudders"?
>>54459829
instead of saying that vitalik said link token needed, just say that vitalik believes both link and uni token much needed sirs

[Anonymous No.54459852]

>>54459829
See >>54446074
>"You can't talk about Chainlink specifically! Why not talk about all these other cryptos as well??"
>Yes, we will.
>"K-k, thanks"
Exact same argument. What a pitiful, buck broken bagholder this guy is.

[Anonymous No.54459874]

>>54459852
???
wtf are babbling on about schizo

[Anonymous No.54459879]

>>54459819
>another buttblasted assmad shill from the other thread coming out of the woodworks to defend his boyfriend
link shills are literally niggers lmao
>>54459852
that was me you impotent imbecile LMAO

[Anonymous No.54459891]

>>54459848
>Image posted 25 times in 3 years
>posted 3 times in the last 5 months
>Permanently stationed here
Top kek.

>>54459879
Hey, good to see you! Seems like you also mis ID'ed me: >>54459744
>inb4 muh samefag

[Anonymous No.54459896]

>>54459852
>Exact same argument.
OP wasn't talking about "other cryptos". He was talking about Link, and specifically what Vitalik said about Link.

[Anonymous No.54459924]

Kek I unironically converted some of my Link for 10 ETH and it has been a wise decision.

Link is such a pathetic underperforming shitcoin it's unreal

[Anonymous No.54459929]

>>54459848
>instead of saying that vitalik said link token needed, just say that vitalik believes both link and uni token much needed
Fucking why?
OP made zero mention of Uni, he mentioned Link.

[Anonymous No.54459930]

>>54459896
The guy you are arguing with is implying that since Vitalik also mentioned UNI, we should also say "UNI needed". You saying yes to that, completely deflates him. Just like >>54446074 tried to engineer a gotcha moment by saying "Since Citi also mentioned these oracles, you should also buy those!"

[Anonymous No.54459976]

>>54459930
Ya, I misread your post lol

[Anonymous No.54459980]

>>54459930
lol that’s malicious FUD. RLC doesn’t do oracles anymore. Their pajeet scam stopped trying to create oracles and has become an AI coin to ride the new hype wave of street shitting.

The desperation and misinformation peak stupid today.