Discuss Chainlink Staking

[Anonymous No.54791575]

Discuss Chainlink Staking

[Anonymous No.54791597]

>>54791575
Linkies hyped staking for 6 years just to get their measly cuck 4% APY.

The cherry on top of the cake is that Link crashed -20% after staking was released. They even get mad when you point this out, it's a literal cult

[Anonymous No.54791612]

>>54791597
Buy linkies will get massive airdrops and fees from other protocols. One of those airdrops is space and time which is working with microsoft. Sure the % seems to be small but don't you think that linkies will benefit from staking? Who knows what else they will receive. What do you think anon?

[Anonymous No.54791613]

>>54791575
>January 2022
>"they could have released a half baked implementation of staking already"
kek, that aged like fine milk
linkies WISH they got a "half assed staking implementation" compared to what they actually got

[Anonymous No.54791619]

>>54791612
I think you're a repulsive incel cuckold.

[Anonymous No.54791628]

>>54791612
sounds like some cringe bagholder cope to me.

[Anonymous No.54791635]

>>54791619
I'm sorry are you >>54791597? Your ID has changed so I'm not sure if this is you or another anon. I don't have any vested interest in the matter discussed, I just enjoy the high IQ posts usually found in chainlink threads, like the screenshot I just used. Also I'm not a cuckold because that means having a gf and then letting someone else sex her. I don't have a gf so that term cannot apply to me.

[Anonymous No.54791646]

>>54791628
Can you give a more detailed explanation?
>>54791619
Apologies anon, I thought you were this anon >>54791628 but he seems to have replied. (see my text above)

[Anonymous No.54791657]

friendly reminder that JUMP TRADING is behind both the blatantly scammy btc dumps to suppress price and the 24/7 FUD campaign on both biz and twitter. this is how they choose to spend their vast resources. these are the parasitic organizations that we will inevitably be purging from the world.

also congrats to SNX for having abysmal foresight and getting suckered into a wolf in sheep's clothing attack..

[Anonymous No.54791676]

>>54791657
yes cuckold, Bulgarians and Pajeets are in a grand conspiracy to suppress your 2017 bags.

What are you going to do about it? lol

[Anonymous No.54791675]

>>54791597
>>54791613
>>54791619
I'm sorry if this might offend toy anons but I don't think you actually want to discuss chainlink staking, as you can clearly see both in the text subject and post this is a thread to discuss chainlink staking. Your posts do not contain any discussion and i have deduced that your goal is to disrupt any discussion by posting text or images with the intention of producing a negative reaction by other anons. I kindly ask you to leave this thread and refrain from posting in it. The same goes for any other anons with similar intentions. Thank you.

[Anonymous No.54791698]

>>54791635
I've yet to see a linkie make a single high IQ post. Everyone in these threads is a low IQ subhuman except for the sane fudders.

[Anonymous No.54791717]

>>54791698
Linkies are hilarious because they act smug and arrogant while being complete idiots.

They still didn't understand that Chainlink Labs doesn't want a hypervolatile token and would rather keep it trading at single digits by dumping it on them (like they always did)

[Anonymous No.54791725]

>>54791698
I've seen various high iq posts by chainlink enthusiasts on this board, and the one thing that seems to unify them is how they see the future unfolding. One where truth replaces trust, which appeals to my better nature. Also I wouldn't call these "fudders" "sane" not by a long shot, the reason being that the archive is full of them repeating the same thing thousands of times, they just insult everyone and post really weird cuck memes that honestly make me cringe, they act as a 15 year old would act. They might not be insane but their actions are far from sane.

[Anonymous No.54791727]

>>54791597
4.75%, plus now an additional ~4.5% from GMX, so 9.25% minimum at this point, plus 30+ BUILD airdrops, all it will take is one of those to perform well for another 5-10% of value, and that pile is growing. Plus there will be more deals like GMX. I imagine by the time LINK stakers are rewarded from BUILD, SCALE, and revenue deals, the APY will be somewhere around 50%+.

That gravy train probably won’t last forever but early stakers are going to be rewarded for sure. By that point we might have CCIP which is going to make value accrual even larger, that is when the node stack race begins and price starts to balloon.

In fact, all of these deals happening are going to contribute to the race. As nodes become more profitable, and as that profit scales with their stake size, they will begin to compete with one another on staking APY to accumulate larger stacks. Many of them will also use their profits to market buy.

That is the true catalyst for the fabled $1k run. It begins as soon as the staking pool opens up.

[Anonymous No.54791733]

>>54791717
>>54791676
I told you anon to please refrain from posting in these threads as your posts are akin to flaming. Please leave my thread.

[Anonymous No.54791748]

>>54791725
The linkie posts only seem intelligent because they're an elaborate fantasy of some supposedly utopian world. Real veterans of business and finance such as myself and other fudders on this board absolutely cringe when hearing people like Sergey thinking his erc-20 shitcoin will be the backbone of finance. The fudders were here to educate you on the dangers of holding Link. We have been begging and pleading with this board to sell link from 40 dollars all the way down to here.

[Anonymous No.54791768]

>>54791727
I'm not reading that schizo bagholder rant

[Anonymous No.54791799]

>>54791748
And why do you cringe when you hear sergey talk about his "erc-20" shitcoin I have seen several of his talks and I don't recall him mentioning anything about the token, however he does mention what the potential impact of the network he has built has on the future of finance. I also sense the sentence "real veterans of the business world" is ungenuine.

[Anonymous No.54791804]

>>54791575
waiting on those buidls :)

[Anonymous No.54791858]

>>54791575
Should have come out two years ago

[Anonymous No.54791874]

>>54791799
I cringe at his self importance and delusions of grandeur. I've seen pretty much all of Sergey's talks over the last 6 years and it's pretty hilarious watching him become increasingly deflated and broken at the abject failure of his project. I even laughed out loud when that indian guy said Sergey was angry, his state of mind is resembling the incel bagholders on this board. Hopefully he doesn't kill himself when his project goes up in flames in the next 3 years.

[Anonymous No.54791916]

>>54791676
I don’t think cuckold is the appropriate word for linkers, maybe masochist would be more fitting, as you have to tolerate the following from the gay sir:

>Heavy breathing while in front of Eric Schmidt
>Rory adopted his wife’s black child
>Lack of updates
>Lack of finished products
>Shitty price action
>Partnering up with literal scams that are shorting link
>Hiring overpaid roasties

Masochist:
a person who derives sexual gratification from their own pain or humiliation

Very fitting for linkers, don’t you think?

[Anonymous No.54791929]

>>54791916
cuckold hits closer to home for the linkers and triggers them harder. Most of them are porn-addicted losers who live with their parents. Masochist doesn't strike home how pathetic linkers are.

[Anonymous No.54791994]

>>54791768
You did already and you know I’m right and have no rebuttal. Simple as.

[Anonymous No.54791995]

>>54791799
You'd be better off in the archives, anon. Staking has been discussed to death, and unless you're lucky enough to have some non-retards online to effort post with, all you'll get are actually retarded fudders like the board is full of.

Is there anything in particular you want to discuss about staking? The people complaining about how it's being implemented are high time-preference niggers. For the first time in 5 years, my linkies are generating more linkies without providing liquidity for degenerate gamblers to short it. And it's only going to get better

[Anonymous No.54792084]

>>54791874
At no point did he mention that he is angry, hence your post makes you a liar. I realise now that you have no real intention of engaging in an actual discussion but rather to spread confusion and fear with your fantasy negativity posts. Please leave my thread.
>>54791916
Applies to you as well. Very ill mannered individuals in this thread so far.

[Anonymous No.54792123]

>>54791995
Thank you anon, I realise that you are correct, most of the threads are very low iq "fud" the reason I started this thread was because I am not very smart however I like to read and analyze smart posts and it seems that chainlink (from what I found in the archives) contains alot of smart discussion in both technical and philosophical aspects. Regarding your question about specifics, what are the next stages of staking and what is the final stage? Already big business entities such as deutcshe telekom and other big institutions are running chainlink nodes, at what point will the system require these entities to stake link tokens? It just makes me thrilled to think of big name corporations using a uitlity token for it's intended purpose; collateral for truth.

[Anonymous No.54792216]

>>54792123
You're smarter than you give yourself credit for, anon.

As for the future, who knows the specifics? The team has said they're expecting v1.0 a year or so after v0.1, and I think staking pools like SDL will pop up to allows token holders to get some yield without having to run a node themselves. As for APY, I doubt it'll ever be too high, but the token price will skyrocket once the network's mature, so yielding 4 or 5% now will be akin to several thousand percent once everyone's scrambling for tokens to gain access to the network. The team has continuously surpassed my expectations, and I see no reason that they'll stop any time soon. See Ari's recent release of the PROFs paper, getting us closer and closer to FSS being the standard

[Anonymous No.54792316]

>>54792216
It's too risky to NOT hold as much Link as you can, desu. All it takes is one big announcement to make the price rocket. We all (inc the fudders, who are obsessed holders) know this and are just shooting the shit until that day comes. When it does, there will be a LOT of people saying they wish they'd bought more, and yet others who missed it completely.
I honestly expect to see multiple God candles in the future with Link. People will be buying-in at $100 and looking towards the thousands in much the way we are today at the lower figures.
Buying Link now at this price will be seen as being an OG in years to come, mark my words.

[Anonymous No.54792326]

>>54791575
This babby version of staking is tolerable, an extra few grand for a couple of years.

Hope I keep my place when real staking is released

[Anonymous No.54792541]

>>54792326
Way I see it is I would do anything for a 100% safe place to park money while getting a % back. Im done with liquidity pools and random scam sites, so i feel comfy.

[Anonymous No.54792581]

>>54792541
It’s not really safe though because crypto is still so volatile and manipulated. I do think long term LINK solidified itself and when overall crypto values lose volatility (post regulatory world, most likely) then yea this will be some of the safest APY available, but for now nothing stopping the market from taking a shit and LINK goes back to $5 and all your staking gains are completely meaningless.

[Anonymous No.54792611]

it's getting pretty crazy how the fudbots come out to derail any genuine discussion threads. Protip: stop responding to all the retarded cuckold posts.

If a crackhead started to yell and scream at you on the street, would you stop to argue with them?

[Anonymous No.54792628]

>>54792611
yeah the difference is that Linkies are the deranged crackheads and the fudders are the sane people mocking you

[Anonymous No.54792670]

>>54792628
>sane people
>spends his life spamming against a cryptocurrency on nu/biz/ over and over and over and over and over and over and ove rand over and over and over and over
brainfucked

[Anonymous No.54792692]

>>54792611
You just responded

[Anonymous No.54792726]

2 LINK + staking reward LINKs staked again. Every day until end of my life (approx 20000 days away).

[Anonymous No.54792817]

>>54791676
>6 posts by this ID

>>54791698
>5 posts by this ID

[Anonymous No.54792843]

>>54792817
7 now

can't handle some banter cuckold?

[Anonymous No.54792878]

>>54791619
Your language betrays you. You speak of repulsiveness, yet your words are grotesque and revolve around degenerate sexual ideas. You are the repulsive one. You and your disgusting group of rudders are perverse and pathetic. Repent and turn to the Lord. May He redeem you in His infinite mercy and power. Amen.

[Anonymous No.54793739]

>>54791575
His ten yr plan is complete (taking billions from you) now just needs to setup his exit. Gonna be tricky from a legal standpoint but I think he’ll pull it off.

[Anonymous No.54793759]

>>54791725
When the “truth” is unveiled, what are the repurcussions of Sergey knowingly recommending scams to his investors? Or does the whole trust thing not apply to the team?

[Anonymous No.54793782]

>>54791748
>elaborate fantasy of some supposedly utopian world
Opposite of reality. We live in a dystopian world dependent on technology just working as intended, a world full of adversaries and bad actors, a world where threats like A.I. are poised to completely dis-intermediate network security we all take for granted when going to the hospital, getting on a plane, or making a bank withdrawal.

End to end cryptographic hardened security is so unbelievably necessary, Eric Schmidt has put his entire career and character on the line with Sergey's vision, a man who advises the U.S. government on existential security threats.

[Anonymous No.54793799]

>>54791575
>Discuss Chainlink Staking
i'm doing it right now, in public

[Anonymous No.54793803]

>>54792123
Bumping this rare, quality thread.

Thanks anons, and to echo it back - you’re all smarter than you give yourself credit for.

[Anonymous No.54793805]

>>54791612
You will get nothing and be happy. If you are good maybe we will let you have your cubes back at a future date. Maybe.

[Anonymous No.54793826]

>>54792216
>The team has said they're expecting v1.0 a year or so after v0.1,
No way, they said staking v0.2, ain’t not way they are ready already.

[Anonymous No.54794293]

>>54793803
this

>>54792216
whats the play/what are you going to do when they allow initial stakers to withdraw their tokens? are the current stakers going to get kicked out of the pool and have to make a decision whether or not they want to stake again (mad dash to the pool)? I currently have my tokens staked and I would guess once youre in the pool, it would be in ones best interest to stay in the pool, and possibly just withdraw some rewards if needed for profit. At the same time I also feel that tokens should be held onto because I firmly believe once this is triple digits anons will have severe regret from selling, as low triple digits i.e. $100 could very well be the beginning as we could easily be in the $300-500 range.

>>54792316
thank you for the stark reminder to keep accumulating after the inital staking pool opened up I have gotten complacent I can do more instead of doing useless degen buys and putting that toward more link

[Anonymous No.54794378]

>>54791613
It's funny that this post came up since a few minutes ago I was just thinking about how if you could show the current state of Chainlink to linkies here from basically any previous year they'd all essentially agree that it was a scam and that this would never happen.
And I don't just mean the staking rollout. But pretty much everything.
Also if you could show them how CCIP is not even close, while another protocol has pretty much eaten that lunch now with basically the same model(ironically released shorter after OP's picrel's post)...they'd be absolutely livid.
It's actually not even that funny any more.
It kinda sucks that things are this bad...and Smartcon itself was a even that seemed more like directly taunting and making fun of holders...
It's all so tiresome really...

[Anonymous No.54795013]

>>54791619
What's with all the cuckphobia?

[Anonymous No.54795465]

>>54794378
>>54792316

Most will miss this meteoric opportunities because it’s simply human nature to question and self-doubt, even after you’ve done all the arithmetic and given yourself the most robust rational framework for the investment decision.

This is why 99.9999% of the population couldn’t see past Amazon as just a book store in the early 2000s.

This is why they didn’t investment in Bitcoin, and still continue to FUD it.

Chainlink is as clear as day. When in doubt, get off the forums and take some space. “you’re on the right track”

[Anonymous No.54795500]

>>54791597
>4%
The staking APY is 5.5%

[Anonymous No.54795524]

>>54794378
>while another protocol has pretty much eaten that lunch now with basically the same model
PLEASE tell me you aren't referring to CCTP here

[Anonymous No.54795868]

>>54795524
I'm thinking of Layer Zero in the crypto space at least.
Now of course that doesn't cover all of what CCIP is meant to(or hopefully going to be) in the bigger picture.
But I mean it's annoying to see the same basic core idea validated and successful in literally 1 year after launching. Now with apparently tens of millions of cross chain tx with a simple oracle and validator model that link could have easily implemented themselves as something like 'CCIP 0.1'...you know?
It's annoying. Especially when you know they're going to launch a token and get 10 figures in MC which could have been the hype spark that link needs now.
I'd totally give them a pass if they had kept the team small and lean...obviously that didn't happen though.

[Anonymous No.54796517]

>staking
>just trust us on the unlock

[Anonymous No.54796589]

>>54791916
Cuckold makes more sense, they are just paying to add more value to Ethereum and not getting to taste the rewards themselves.

[Anonymous No.54796775]

if you like chainlink, u are a bad person
and i mean that in every sense
by the foundational root, you are rotten
morally
physically
spiritually

[Anonymous No.54796851]

free alpha

[Anonymous No.54796871]

>>54796851
So they're working to shut down V2 so that they don't have to pay for the oracles twice?

[Anonymous No.54796899]

>>54796871
Yes, that is one of the reasons. Other benefits on consolidating is less fragmented liquidity, less work for upkeeping smart contracts and their parameters etc.

[Anonymous No.54796940]

>>54796851
fuck chainlink
extorting great cryptos like this
like common thugs

[Anonymous No.54798077]

>>54791597
>>54791628
>>54791676
>>54791717
>>54791768
>>54792628
>>54792843
>>54791613
>>54791619
>>54791698
>>54791748
>>54791874
>>54791929
>>54791916
>>54793739
>>54793759
>>54794378
>>54795868
>>54796589
>>54796517
>>54796775
>>54796940
this pasta only seems to become more and more accurate every time these fags / samefags try to spam biz with link fud

The usual discord nufudders are actually a lower form of life than unpaid internet janitors:
>constantly making 50+ pbtid fudding in discussion threads over 10+ hours whenever they're up
>the rest of the time they seem to be seething, samefagging, and monitoring in up to 6 fud threads at any one time during their "rush hour"
>sometimes when they're really upset because no one takes them seriously, they'll spam the board with nikado avacado's asshole threads
>they have been doing this possibly since 2021, when a lot of them bought the top and never recovered
>others lost their stacks on bancor and celsius
>some even think that they're "fighting the wef" by posting on here - yes they're that retarded
>lets be generous with the math and say that they've only done this for five days a week (including holidays) for one year (50x52=2600 hours spent doing this maybe, not including the time they've spent making low quality memes and looking at pictures of the best cock cages to use)
>all over an apparently shitty and unimportant crypto
>on a board that doesn't even affect the prices
>all for FREE

[Anonymous No.54798655]

>>54791619
How do I get into link fudding? You guys are a dead give away especially with all the cuckholding insults but I'm clever and I am not from a third world country. Shoot me an invite to your discord.

[Anonymous No.54798727]

>>54798077
Right. I forgot. Not allowed to try to discuss link on /biz/ in 2023 without triggering people.
Thanks for the reminder.

[Anonymous No.54798794]

not about staking but my mETH head friends got pissed I gave them the redpill on MEV. Any anons have more MEV content?

First the L2s and now MEV, I don't know if ETH is going to be the one long term (even with sharding and whatever the fuck).

[Anonymous No.54798826]

>>54798655
Well first you have to buy link and hope for a return for 5 years. At a certain point during that you'll come to hate yourself and your shit investment and start lashing out at it.

[Anonymous No.54799155]

MEV is theft, simple as.