[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 35 KB, 278x276, link.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55039096 No.55039096 [Reply] [Original]

Chainlink will always underperform. Why? Have you ever used it? Sure, it can be used by devs of some garbage scam apps to pull quality data, but that's not most people who buy crypto. If there is no reason for people like me or you to buy (like ETH has) the price will always be trash.

2019-2020 performance was an outlier caused by speculation because there was a psyop that this was the most important project in crypto (it isn't)

>> No.55039100

>>55039096
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eHF4fkI_iUc&pp=ygUVaGVhcnRzdG9wcGVycyBkYXlnbG93

>> No.55039117

>>55039096
Chainlink is a cuckoo bird coin

>> No.55039136

>>55039096
>there is no reason for people like me or you to buy (like ETH has)
lmao, some of the highest demand for ETH (gas) happens whenever the price of ETH is completely cratering.
There is literally no causality between rising demand for ETH and a rising ETH price.

Also, the greatest domestic demand for fuel doesn't come from people paying directly for car fuel, but indirectly for all the fuel needed to produce every single product and service people use.
In short, you're a dumbass.

>> No.55039139

>>55039136
op
>there's no reason for anyone to buy link
clg
>loool link is like fuel, you're a dumbass lool
then how come I still don't need to buy it, dumbass?

>> No.55039152

>>55039139
The dapps that use Chainlink pay for it, and you pay the dapps.
You are paying for the Link tokens, just like you pay for the transportation gasoline when you buy food.

>> No.55039153

>>55039136
I pay direct for car fuel because I needed. I don’t need chainlink token

>> No.55039156

>>55039152
I literally don't use any dapps, I'm just trading shitcoins on spot, and that only requires ETH
seethe harder

>> No.55039157

>>55039153
>I pay direct for car fuel
You pay a lot more for fuel indirectly.

also
>because I needed

>> No.55039158

>>55039152

This.

The fud is so disingenuous at this point. What is the end goal, to delay Chainlink from mooning by like 2 months?

>> No.55039167

>>55039158
>2 more weeks
Good one

>> No.55039168

>>55039156
>I literally don't use any dapps
congrats I guess lol
And still the odds that you used a service that relies on Chainlink are very great.

>> No.55039169

>>55039158
>le this le disingenuous
yeah bro, go on and tell us about all these dapps you're using on a daily basis which contribute to the vast usage of the link token
dude, nobody gives a fuck, touch grass

>> No.55039171

>>55039168
let's see what services I've been using
>localbitcoins
>btc atm
>binance
>binance visa
looks like you were wrong

>> No.55039180
File: 148 KB, 614x690, 1668428245523205.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55039180

>>55039171
>Binance

>> No.55039182

>>55039180
binance is not bnb though, it's a spot exchange
are you retarded?

>> No.55039189

>>55039180
Token not needed

>> No.55039196

>>55039169

I use lending platforms at least once a week to fund my lavish lifestyle You fucking pathetic worm

Also the dapp I work for uses VRF

>> No.55039201

>>55039182
Just saying, Binance itself is knee-deep in oracles.
The second you try to do anything other than barebones 2010-style trading (swaps, yield farming, NFTs, ...) you're likely using Chainlink.

>> No.55039217

>>55039196
yet you can't name one so we can examine the actual usage from volume and traffic
lmao
>>55039201
>you need chainlink for swaps, yield farming, NFTs, which nobody cares anymore after the bullrun
too bad I've never been interested on these shady bullshit
face it dude, you're wrong and the vast majority of people neither need nor care about your heavy bags

>> No.55039224

>>55039217
We get it, centralized exchanges are the pinnacle of crypto functionality for you.
Have a nap, grampa, think about your blood pressure.

>> No.55039226

>>55039224
no, making money is the pinnacle of crypto functionality you buzzword loving imbecile

>> No.55039229

>>55039226
People have been making fortunes using crypto in ways that go beyond spot trading on centralized exchanges lmao

>> No.55039232

>>55039229
>duude NFTs and yield farming is the future of crypto brooo!
>duude you MUST engage in ponzi farming if you wanna get rich!
the absolute state of shitcoin bagholders, point at them and laugh!

>> No.55039239

>>55039232
>crypto bad
>therefore Chainlink bad
>only CEXes good

>> No.55039244

>>55039239
>you have to use chainlink!!1
>ok but in the future, if you want these niche gambling features, you have to use chainlink!!
>o-o-okay don't use all these neat degenerate gambling mechanisms boomer, s-s-stay poor
the argument is that link is like fuel, I proved to you it isn't
seethe harder

>> No.55039251

>>55039244
>in the future
Chainlink has been the foundation of most non-CEX crypto functionality for many years now.

>> No.55039257

>>55039251
and nobody gives a shit about non-CEX functionality, since you can't even access fiat ramps from them
dude, are you like 18?

>> No.55039273

>>55039257
>nobody gives a shit about non-CEX functionality
The biggest financial institutions in the world give a shit lol

>> No.55039284

>>55039273
>le biggest financial institutions care about yield farming and nfts dude trust me bro dude
touch grass
>chainlink is fuel!!! if we accept 10 different premises about CEXes, crypto ideology, blah blah yada yada
yeah, @ me again when I'm able to exchange my ponzis for CASH through a DEX

>> No.55039285

>>55039136
>no causality between rising demand and a rising price
so "nodes must be paid in link" is entirely inconsequential to the token price?

>> No.55039290

>>55039284
seething lmao

>>55039285
Same with BTC, ETC, ...

>> No.55039291

>>55039290
dude, through a CEX I can instantly charge my visa and buy shit with it
what can you do with NFTs and DEXes?
nothing
get rekt

>> No.55039298

>>55039291
buddy here thinks crypto functionality peaked with Mt Gox

>> No.55039302

>>55039298
it unironically did, but keep drinking the koolaid of web3 ponzis I guess

>> No.55039320

>>55039290
>Same with BTC, ETC, ...
so link token price is entirely dependent on market hype? all the talk about partnerships, "token needed for x", staking, everything, is meaningless?

>> No.55039339

>>55039284

You're a LARPing clown

>> No.55039393

>>55039096
>>55039117
>>55039139
>>55039153
>>55039156
>>55039167
>>55039169
>>55039171
>>55039182
>>55039189
>>55039217
>>55039226
>>55039232
>>55039244
>>55039257
>>55039284
>>55039291
>>55039302
wow looks like a lot of work went into fudding in this thread
the end result, as always, is
>just not selling my chainlink tokens (ticker:LINK)

>> No.55039488

>>55039339
>hurrr if you're not gambling on shitty dapp ponzis you're a larper
kys

>> No.55039502

>>55039320
As much as BTC, ETH, ...

>>55039488
>crypto bad
>therefore Chainlink bad

>> No.55039512

>>55039502
>As much as BTC, ETH, ...
that's my point. if link is no different from all the other projects, why buy link and not just BTC?

>> No.55039524

>>55039512
Why did people buy ETH, Solana, ADA, XRP, BNB, ... instead of just BTC?

>> No.55039561

>>55039524
I love it when the double standard gets systematically broken down like this.

>> No.55039564

>>55039524
if you know the answer, just say it. if it's embarrassing for you, maybe you should rethink your investment

>> No.55039572

>>55039564
You really can't think of any reason why people might have bought ETH, Solana, ADA, XRP, BNB, ... instead of just BTC?
Then why are you asking this question solely in relation to Link? Your quandary clearly applies to the broader crypto market rather than a single coin.

>> No.55039577

>>55039561
>double standard
what double standard? you claim that link is a better investment than the alternatives. then it turns out it's as bad as them or worse. when it is pointed out that you were wrong, that's not a double standard, that's just poor judgement on your part

>> No.55039585

>>55039577
>you claim that link is a better investment than the alternatives. then it turns out it's as bad as them or worse
Just because speculation is the primary mover of coin price doesn’t mean all coins are equal.

>> No.55039592

>>55039572
if you don't have an answer to the question you pretend is rhetorical, maybe don't pose it as such? following your reasoning, there should be no reason to buy link over anything else, since it's all driven by hype. yet you imply there is a reason to do so, without having the balls to say it

>> No.55039598 [DELETED] 

>>55039592
>if you don't have an answer to the question
I do, obviously.
The point is that if you do not know the answer, then your doesn't apply to Link as such but to the entire crypto market.

>> No.55039608

>>55039592
>if you don't have an answer to the question
I do, obviously.
The point is that if you do not know the answer, then your question doesn't apply to Link as such but to the entire crypto market.

>> No.55039688

>>55039585
>Just because speculation is the primary mover of coin price doesn’t mean all coins are equal.
so the rules don't apply to link? your fellow holder disagrees: >>55039290

>> No.55039690

>>55039688
>so the rules don't apply to link?
lol what?
The whole point of calling out a double standard is that the rules SHOULD apply equally.

>> No.55039692

>>55039608
>I do, obviously.
why dance around and not just come out and say it then?

>> No.55039703

>>55039692
Make a thread asking this question about crypto as a whole and I will.
Be sure to link it in here.

>> No.55039704

>>55039690
>the rules SHOULD apply equally.
exactly. but apparently, link is different: >>55039585
>doesn’t mean all coins are equal
what is it, then?

>> No.55039714

>>55039704
There’s no contradiction there, you’re just a mental midget.
Rules apply equally to all football teams, but not all football teams are the same.

>> No.55039720

>>55039703
>shit up the board with yet another meaningless thread because i'm afraid to clearly state my argument
no. if you want to be a pussy, be my guest

>> No.55039723

>>55039714
which mean link is a shitty investment, because it cant pump like the alternatives

>> No.55039724

>>55039720
Your question has nothing to do with Link, but with the speculative nature of crypto as a whole.

>> No.55039728

>>55039723
Part of the reason is because it’s treated very differently from the rest of crypto.

>> No.55039732

Link needs to abandon eth
Like every one else needs to abandon pos shit
Link can work on btc layer 2

>> No.55039806

>>55039217
>you need chainlink for swaps, yield farming, NFTs, which nobody cares anymore after the bullrun
>too bad I've never been interested on these shady bullshit
He's actually saying you don't need Chainlink for any of that(which is true).