/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.57950484]

this projects sounds very ambitious. Like the type of thing a billion dollar company would pay need to pay millions to a large team of software engineers to accomplish.

Do you really think their team would be capable of doing this and are sufficiently funded?

[Anonymous No.57950541]

>>57950484
>this indians sounds very fruity. Like the type of subhuman a billion dollar company would pay to promote their shitcoin to a large audience of clueless muppets to pump their bags.

>Do you really think their Shitdiks and Vagnals would be capable of doing this and are sufficiently funded?

[Anonymous No.57950552]

>>57950541
i don't even own any lol

[Anonymous No.57950569]

>>57950552
>i'm not even getting paid lol

[Anonymous No.57951136]

>>57950484
Why would you buy this when you could just get into Fetch.AI and make out with a higher % return? FET will be in the top ten cryptos by the end of this year.

[Anonymous No.57951511]

>>57951136
Because fet is a similar ai type bs token nobody needs but since it has ai in the name the MC is already pretty much saturated. Not so with RLC. Thats all for me.

[Anonymous No.57951647]

even if this coin is the goat there's no way this is going to pump during meme season

[Anonymous No.57952722]

>>57951647
It giga pumps right after BTC takes a bigger dip. This was told to me in a dream.

[Anonymous No.57953382]

>>57950484

>Do you really think their team would be capable of doing this?

The CEO (pic related)
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=8UEfrTEAAAAJ&hl=en

>and are sufficiently funded?
Their ETH wallet from the ICO: https://etherscan.io/address/0x21346283a31a5ad10fa64377e77a8900ac12d469#internaltx
Their RLC wallet from the ICO: https://etherscan.io/address/0xd65380d773208a6aa49472bf55186b855b393298
+ they have 10k BTC from the ICO
That's almost 1b$ in funding currently... It's about 900m$, but soon it'll be 1b$. While they also have many outside sources of funding in the form of partnerships

TLDR;
The CEO literally INVENTED the forefather of cloud computing called GRID computing. Their funding is soo huge they have a chance of 0% of going bankrupt, they can FOREVER fund the project no mater if bull or bear market.

[Anonymous No.57953420]

>>57953382
You fool, Gilles is gonna cash out all the assets for endless trannies in Jakarta.

[Anonymous No.57953481]

>>57953382
i dont think they have 10k BTC. That's where all the ETH came from. If so you should be able to provide the address

[Anonymous No.57953588]

>>57953481
Nope, they said they still hold the BTC, can't provide the address because I don't know it...
But sure, they probably did spend a small portion of it already, it's been 7 years...

[Anonymous No.57953650]

>>57953588
so how tf did they acquire 37k eth? I've asked about BTC in the TG and they always ignore it. Blaire doesnt do anything anymore

[Anonymous No.57953696]

>>57953650
On the ICO you could pay with either BTC or ETH. They happily took both, but they always mention the BTC stack, since it is far bigger. + they took I think 5% of the RLC supply.

It's not just 37k ETH, used to be 120k ETH if you look at the analytics page https://etherscan.io/address/0x21346283a31a5ad10fa64377e77a8900ac12d469#analytics

[Anonymous No.57953852]

>>57953696
> 10k ETH to 3AC

[Anonymous No.57953888]

>>57953852
What? I don't get the 3AC part. 3 arrow capital?

[Anonymous No.57954052]

>>57953852
Nelly cost a lot of ETH, yet she still doesn't do shit for the company except for put on a bad fake smile

[Anonymous No.57954970]

>>57954052
calm down, razerboy

[Anonymous No.57955009]

>>57954970
calm down, PoorCryptoFag

[Anonymous No.57955018]

>get 3 finishers on seer
>BR only

[Anonymous No.57955193]

>>57954970
>razerboy
That's a name I haven't heard in a long time

[Anonymous No.57955232]

>>57955009
Going to meditate on your picture to stave off the fud.

[Anonymous No.57955283]

>>57955193
Faggets banned me on their twitter, because I told Intel that they aren't decentralized. Literally wasn't a week or 2 later that they announced the public worker pools. I basically single-handedly pressured them into saying it after 7 years. I also started rallying up the troops on twitter, all the supporters AGAINST iExec, pointing out their endless financing and how they don't do anything with it...

All you need to do is say the truth and people usually lose their minds

[Anonymous No.57955317]

>>57955193
Intel of course didn't do anything. Wouldn't have expected anything from those cunts, but in the end they did announce the worker pools, which is what I wanted and that's ok! Now we just need a decentralized governance system so I can fire Blaire and Nelly and replace them.

[Anonymous No.57956069]

>>57955283
Doing honorable work, it is all tiresome.
About their BTC and ETH, I heard that they don't want to touch their warchest because of "taxes". I don't konw if it's true. One thing is sure they barely touched anything with all the founding they received.
How Blair hasn't been fired yet ? I thought he was gone, he never did shit and never will.
Goodspeed razerboy

[Anonymous No.57956213]

Kek "razorboy"

[Anonymous No.57956273]

>>57956069
Not sure, even if the taxed are a hastle, they have 900m reasons to get them sorted. Not like they couldn't just get an accounting service... Sounds a bit weird that taxes are a problem with that amount of funding.

>How Blair hasn't been fired yet ?
https://iex.ec/about-us/ Look under adoption.

>Doing honorable work, it is all tiresome.
Thank you fren, much appreciated

[Anonymous No.57956321]

>>57950484
You realize French people haven’t done anything since Napoleon and are basically an agricultural country, right?

[Anonymous No.57957160]

>>57953382
So basically they can't go broke and iExec will last forever. Just bought 10k worth

[Anonymous No.57957246]

>>57957160
Yes, exactly true. 100% true, it's just about Gilles not being a business man, but an academic who doesn't know how to run a business, therefore he's afraid to spend it in order to further progress. He's just scared about making the wrong move, therefore he's ultra careful... So careful it's actually bad.

[Anonymous No.57957293]

>>57957160
But I need to also point out that the team finally stopped losing members... The first few years people were constantly quitting and changing, they just couldn't grow the team. Now the team is growing and people aren't constantly changing out. They now have probably around 60 people??? Somewhere along those lines, they had below 40 people at the start of 2023. They've also stated that they're much more in sync with each other in the sense that the roles of who does what are much more clear than they were like 1 to 2 years ago. I guess that we can expect better results now due to that

[Anonymous No.57957439]

>>57957246
>>57957293
They can't lose at this rate it's actually a shoe in

[Anonymous No.57957522]

>>57957439
Yes of course. I just REALLY REALLY hope that the worker pools come out this year. Gilles did confirm in the twitter space about the roadmap about 1 to 2 months ago, after I pressured them with the whole Intel fiasco, that the worker pools are coming and I quote "They're coming out this year FOR SURE" and then he went rabbling on about how they might not have a lot of work and that they're working on getting people to use the pools in order for the workers to have work.

I just hope that me pressuring Intel was a wake up call for them...

[Anonymous No.57957644]

>>57957439
This was published at the end of 2023

https://twitter.com/iEx_ec/status/1729893135516381606

Listen in from 14min onwards up to like 16min 40s.

This is THE FIRST TIME they THEMSELVES stated that the worker pools are coming. The PUBLIC worker pools to be more specific, not the private ones that have been running on the sidechain FOR YEARS.

Never has this happened before, all the years before this people were shilling "public worker pools around the corner" and now it's ACTUALLY HAPPENING. I'm just a bit concerned that it's not on the roadmap https://trello.com/b/oSCT5z09/iexec-roadmap-milestones . But they did mention that not everything is on the roadmap... Which is a bit weird, since why would you mention the worker pools coming out in the twitter space, but not have it on the roadmap


TLDR; PUBLIC worker pools around the corner! This time for real, Gilles himself CONFIRMED IT

[Anonymous No.57957866]

>>57957644
I hope it will bring something valuable and doesn't end like the e-rlc.

[Anonymous No.57957892]

>>57957866
This is literally the thing EVERYONE has been waiting for 7 years. You'll finally be able to provide your computing power and contribute to the network. The value proposition is literally INSANE, we could get as big as RNDR, since it's literally the same thing, but CONFIDENTIAL on top of that

[Anonymous No.57957979]

>>57957866
Ah, I also forgot to mention. If you want to contribute to the worker pools, you'll need to own RLC. The more you'll have the bigger of a task you can compute. It used to be that if you have 100RLC then you can compute something that's worth 33.33RLC, so 1/3 of the staked amount. This will make it so that people will need to buy RLC in order to even be able to join. ANYONE can join, doesn't matter if it's a home PC or if you have an array of computers. The minimum requirements are not big at all. If your computer is idling most of the day this is PERFECT, you just need a bit of RLC...

This can change, it used to be like this in the beta versions of the worker pools a few years back. But the fact that you'll need RLC in order to be able to join is true. They might have change the 1/3 of your stack part, but that's not really that important. And trust me, people will want to contribute. You'd be a fool not to want to contribute. I'm currently running a Golem worker, while also doing work on Theta, because why not, I'm slurping up free money

[Anonymous No.57958022]

>>57957866
>>57957979
Therefore get 100 RLC, just for the worker pools... Even if you don't believe in the project AT ALL, just get 100RLC in order to have a guarantee to be able to join the worker pools later this year. It'll surely make you money if you just setup a worker and leave it running

[Anonymous No.57958146]

It's over I solded

[Anonymous No.57958658]

>>57958146
A huge weight got lifted off your shoulders, fren

[Anonymous No.57958737]

>>57958146
Thank fren, now we can finally pump, since you solded 100k$

[Anonymous No.57958907]

>>57957979
>>57958022
>public workers
Any idea whether tasks will be more CPU or GPU intensive or will it just depend on the work?
I remember looking at the minimum specs for it years ago and there was some very weird stuff on there like saying you needed two CPUs (which I think was probably a translation error of minimum dual core or something like that).

[Anonymous No.57959185]

I've held into 500 RLC since 2021.
I've probably technically lost money on them since I bought the bulk of them for $5 at this point.
All in all I'll keep holding and see where things go. Ride the wave, anons.

[Anonymous No.57959611]

>>57959185
Which part of "it's over Gilles" do you not understand?

[Anonymous No.57960285]

>>57958907
>which I think was probably a translation error of minimum dual core or something like that
You only need 1 CPU, but if you have 2 that's even better I guess!

>Any idea whether tasks will be more CPU or GPU intensive or will it just depend on the work?
Depends on the task. Either you get a tasks that's computed exclusively on the CPU or a task that's computed exclusively on the GPU. But I'm not sure if the GPU worker pools will be available from the start.... That's up for debate. I hope they will be I guess.
iExec does have early access to the H100 GPUs, which they've mentioned a few times on twitter now.
Also if you look at the roadmap https://trello.com/b/oSCT5z09/iexec-roadmap-milestones and click Privacy-Enhancing Technologies you can see it say "NVIDIA GPU for Trusted AI". This refers to the H100 GPUs, which are AI specific GPUs
https://twitter.com/iEx_ec/status/1763267706718154809

[Anonymous No.57960354]

nah its pointless. their sidechain, nor eth/polygon infra is remotely capable of sustaining the amount of complex txns that come with the services they want to provide.

[Anonymous No.57960542]

>>57960354
Ah anon, wise words. How exactly do you know that? Can you explain the complex transactions a chain would need to handle, what's complex about them?

[Anonymous No.57962041]

>>57960542
If only you knew how over it is