New swift article just dropped

[Anonymous No.58112339]

https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/need-rich-data-shared-ledger-paradigm

What did they mean by this?

>In our view, this approach represents a more achievable and pragmatic path to unlocking the benefits of shared ledger technology, as well as the value provided by the rich and structured data carried in a messaging layer.

[Anonymous No.58112365]

comment made before autistic screeching about LINK

[Anonymous No.58112407]

>>58112365
>Swift has a long history of working with the financial services community to solve challenges and facilitate industry-wide innovation. We continue to demonstrate this by participating in industry initiatives such as the RLN, and by driving activities such as our recent central bank digital currency (CBDC) sandbox and blockchain interoperability experiments.

Why are you blaming chainlink , when swift put them in the article?

[Anonymous No.58112417]

SWIFT needs more under the table bribes from larping crypto projects, in order to release more fake news to trick retail speculators

[Anonymous No.58112425]

>>58112417
Good one, havent heard this one before.

[Anonymous No.58112432]

Article sharticle

[Anonymous No.58112534]

Not sure if this has anything to do with Chainlink but if it does then I'm angry about it (idk why tho).

[Anonymous No.58112636]

>>58112407
im a huge bag holder however
> ctrl+f "chainlink"
> zero results

[Anonymous No.58112704]

>>58112417

[Anonymous No.58112764]

>Such a state machine could be built on more decentralised blockchain technology, or equally a more centralised platform like Swift’sTransaction Managercould be enhanced for this use.

[Anonymous No.58112806]

>>58112339
>Universal shared ledger
This is the opposite of what Chainlink's approach and is being advocated by the BIS. It's literally just one giant ledger model. It won;t work, and my feeling is that Swift are just posting it up because they can't just ignore it. There's no way the BIS will convince everyone to jump on board with this. It's so dated. You might as well say they're going to use Quant

[Anonymous No.58112912]

>>58112806
That’s the point of the article. The shared ledger needs to be data rich, which it currently isn’t. This is them saying you need an oracle.

[Anonymous No.58112978]

>>58112806
/thread

>boomer boss asks mid manager to put out article on blockchain bc investors keep asking

>middle manager has no clue about any of it, delegates down to zoomer staff

>intern helps zoomer staff generate buzzword article with chatgpt in 15 minutes

>article posted, everyone leaves early on Friday

[Anonymous No.58112993]

>>58112912
WOWWWWWW they HINTED at the word ORACLE holy shit!!!!!! Just wait until this BREADCRUMB is absorbed throughout the markets!!!! Hey if I post this on plebbit will you UPVOTE me??

[Anonymous No.58112994]

>>58112912
Ah fair enough, i should've spent more time reading it properly

[Anonymous No.58113020]

>>58112339
Imagine still caring about swift after they kicked russia off. Swift is dead now and the whole world knows it.

[Anonymous No.58113028]

>>58112993
>if I post this on plebbit will you UPVOTE me?
yes, i will. anyone else?

[Anonymous No.58113107]

>>58112417
> SWIFT needs more under the table bribes

Honestly the first time i respond to link fud in years, but fuck mi sideways this one was precious…

[Anonymous No.58113116]

>>58112365
>PLEASE IT CANT BE CHAINLINK! IT JUST CANT! BECAUSE IT JUST CANT OKAY!

[Anonymous No.58113138]

>>58113116
>THIS THIS THIS OMG SO MUCH THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.58113145]

>>58113116
>>58113138
lmao the link baggie is having a meltdown

[Anonymous No.58113172]

yes guys a fucking ethereum token is going to be the next big thing lmao retards

[Anonymous No.58113203]

>>58113172
If its just an eth token how did you manage to find yourself here? Do you stroll into homosexual clubs unknowingly too?

[Anonymous No.58113390]

>>58113203
kek, every day, apparently

[Anonymous No.58113444]

>>58113172
>>58113390
>>58113145
You fucks are all going straight to hell. Never selling and I hope you all die.

[Anonymous No.58113455]

>>58112993
CONGRATULATIONS! Now should I make thinly veiled comments about DIGNITY,
self-esteem and finding TRUE FUN in your RIGHT VENTRICLE??

[Anonymous No.58113762]

Bump

[Anonymous No.58113855]

Feels good being in the pool.

[Anonymous No.58114011]

>>58112339
>establishment attempt at misdirection in order to accumulate more LINK and XRP
>uncredited author
Hmmmmmm

[Anonymous No.58114070]

>>58113444
>>58113455
>>58113855
>>58114011
Checking digits
>>58113172
Checking faggotry

[Anonymous No.58114210]

>>58113172
>fud is reaching 2017/18 style again
kek they really are helpless

[Anonymous No.58115322]

Felt like a massive fud article at first, but eventually resolves into
>chainlink probably needed

[Anonymous No.58115422]

>>58113172
I keep pointing this out but I feel like nobody else sees it for the red flag that it is. It's not going to be anything eth related. I'm sorry anon.

[Anonymous No.58115811]

>>58112407
Is the link in the article with us?

[Anonymous No.58116835]

>>58115811
Earth to retard. I quoted the part that mentions chainlink
>blockchain interoperability experiments

Scroll down to the fucking bottom and click the link. Moron

[Anonymous No.58117807]

>>58112339
i expect nothing and yet somehow i've gotten disapointed
srsly who pays these people or approve of their shit articles? this is just as bad as the shit kotaku posts daily like they have an humiliation fetish

but oh well, what can you expect of retards who barely know what btc is in general and have no idea of the existence of alts, memecoins, shitcoins, etc. Hell, ask them what mumu is, or what bobo is and they'll tell you they're the creatures from "monsters vs aliens" lmfao