Chainlink

[Anonymous No.58482000]

https://www.dtcc.com/dtcc-connection/articles/2024/may/16/smart-nav-pilot-report-bringing-trusted-data-to-the-blockchain-ecosystem?

https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/DTCC-Connection/Smart_NAV-Report.pdf

just shorted 100k btc

[Anonymous No.58482007]

oh shit oh fuck

[Anonymous No.58482016]

>>58482000
Also checked. Also gO00 iD
Send BTC to $35k post haste

[Anonymous No.58482022]

IM COOOOOOOOOMING

[Anonymous No.58482034]

I bet the price is going to go down.

[Anonymous No.58482035]

we are so back stinkmarines

[Anonymous No.58482045]

>>58482034
this is exactly whats going to happen

[Anonymous No.58482062]

ok time to rotate back into LINK lol

[Anonymous No.58482069]

>>58482062
nah I joke I've been in like any good LINK cuck since forever

but this does seem like proper news for once

[Anonymous No.58482070]

Not getting excited over the price of Link anymore. I'm done with getting disappointed.

[Anonymous No.58482094]

DTCC dedicate an entire page of their report to shilling Chainlink

[Anonymous No.58482114]

is this news big enough to break through the Jedi mind block around Chainlink?

[Anonymous No.58482115]

>>58482000
>cntrl + F "Chainlink"
>13 responses found

[Anonymous No.58482134]

>>58482114
Probably not, normies don't even know what SWIFT is and that was big in the news because Russia. Only /smg/ and gme culties know what the DTCC is.

[Anonymous No.58482142]

bullish for witnet and tellor

[Anonymous No.58482152]

Why isn't the price moving?

[Anonymous No.58482168]

>>58482152
It has to be fake news just like Hbar

[Anonymous No.58482172]

>>58482152
Priced in, only fake news like >>58482168
can pump coins.

[Anonymous No.58482174]

>>58482152
token not sneeded

[Anonymous No.58482188]

>+0.9%

[Anonymous No.58482190]

>>58482000
>literally who was paid $100k by chainlink labs to put their logo on an image again
woo! zzz...

[Anonymous No.58482258]

I don't even know what to say anymore

[Anonymous No.58482279]

>>58482000
let me guess: this was another pilot, PoC, test, etc.
>but why price not move?
XRP had plenty of those at even larger scale

[Anonymous No.58482290]

>>58482258
I wonder what sergey thinks of the fact that useless meme frog tokens are outperforming LINK on the day they announced they will be working with the DTCC on RWA

[Anonymous No.58482298]

>>58482279
XRP did not have a single PoC with Swift or DTCC

[Anonymous No.58482305]

>>58482279
yep this dude nailed it
more LINKies should really look into what happened to XRP. the connections it had make chainlink look like nothing. yet it was test this, pilot that, oh wow we're so schizo tehe, the whole time and now look at it

[Anonymous No.58482306]

>>58482290
>I wonder what sergey thinks
"ME HUNGRY"

[Anonymous No.58482356]

We've gone from breadcrumbs to industrial bakeries.

[Anonymous No.58482360]

>>58482305
Jason is just sad that he sold the bottom kek
he actually sold at 7 I think, dude needs to get over it

[Anonymous No.58482396]

>>58482360
The old "lost all my link being retarded" to "full time obsessive link fudder" pipeline is full of sad souls.
Many such cases.

[Anonymous No.58482406]

>>58482360
i don't care about him individually what he said is correct. also he seems to be a fund CEO so he's probably doing fine.

[Anonymous No.58482411]

>>58482152
do you really think they will buy LINK from (You) to use the network anon ?
do you really ?

[Anonymous No.58482413]

>>58482356
Just how many transactions can an oracle node process? I get nodes don't need to broadcast to every node in a blockchain to get to finality, they don't need to mine, nor build blocks, I'm just curious on what limiter they may have.

[Anonymous No.58482416]

>>58482406
I mean, just looking at how obsessively he fuds LINK, clearly not

when you dedicate a significant part of your time to negativity something is wrong

[Anonymous No.58482417]

>>58482000
>>58482007
>>58482022
>>58482094
>>58482114
>>58482142

Absolute unprecedented insanity

[Anonymous No.58482420]

>>58482069
>>58482070
It's an announcement of the kind of testing they've been teasing that they're doing for years now. Every breadcrumb is squeezed for all it's worth with how they market through semi-astroturfing shit. If you overreact to this kind of thing it becomes too similar to that scene in the (good) Theranos documentary where the company throws a party just because one part of the design didn't fail a non-negotiable compliance test. You'd think it would, right? You'd have to think they'd be able to hook up a cable with DTCC by now, given the kinds of gasbagging everyone here does about their present and ongoing infiltration and revolution of world commerce, handpicked by Klaus Schwab himself, supported by an ex Google CEO, so on. I mean, come on.

It's good they've got parts of the tech working, but there's no product here. They probably need some arc of other supplementary solutions before they actually tokenize mutual funds and DTCC ships... you know how it goes. And there'll still be so much handholding to go. You can argue that's because we're early if you want, but I won't be excited until we truly cross the line and tap into a revenue stream, genuine demand. Only that would legitimise the stinking piss-take of the last few years. I really hope we get out of this with something, anons, because I am tired as all fuck.

[Anonymous No.58482432]

>>58482420
Congrats, or sorry that happened. Whichever fits best.

[Anonymous No.58482437]

>>58482420
true enough anon

[Anonymous No.58482457]

>>58482432
You have skewered me, sir. Filleted and barbecued, I've been, chopped and chewed. Now go on! You dirty little rascal!

[Anonymous No.58482468]

>>58482000
Already sold mine bro, utility tokens just don't pump. Only memes pump now. You had your chance, ya blew it.

[Anonymous No.58482484]

>>58482000
Checked

Link will 10x overnight one of these days and that will merely be a correction

[Anonymous No.58482486]

>>58482416
>>58482416
>when you dedicate a significant part of your time
this is what you new fags dont get. if you bought ico and held for seven years, spending hrs on end reading white paper and docs. you would be pissed off too when nothing has come to you personally of all that hard work. You nuf fags just read photo shopped screen shots and hit buy in 2019

[Anonymous No.58482491]

[Anonymous No.58482503]

>>58482486
if you bought at ICO you made a 100x

[Anonymous No.58482509]

>>58482484
you realize chainlink's marketcap is already $8 billion right? the DTCC's equity value was only $2 billion in 2018

[Anonymous No.58482519]

Literal nothingburger
Sit the fuck down linkoids

[Anonymous No.58482524]

>>58482420
>another wall of boring fud
Your life must be so empty and devoid of any joy whatsoever. Christ almighty you people make me vomit. Sapping any joy from everything you touch, you utter cunts.

[Anonymous No.58482526]

>>58482022
>pilot

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LINKOIDS JUST CAN'T CATCH A BREAK

[Anonymous No.58482532]

>>58482524
They have clinical major depression anon, the only thing approaching pleasure that they get is in trying to bring others down to their level.

[Anonymous No.58482542]

>>58482306
always makes me kek

[Anonymous No.58482566]

if you listen to fud c u c k s and try to time a btc dump you're going to lose

[Anonymous No.58482568]

>>58482000
oh cool let me check the price
>everything going down, link barely up
looks good!

[Anonymous No.58482624]

yeah but
I'm still poor
when is it going to happen already
fucking fat scamming Russian slob

[Anonymous No.58482627]

>>58482524
you shill never address any points what so ever. Where is the actual product/ revenue from the tokenomics. Thats the only thing that matters

[Anonymous No.58482631]

>>58482486
I was in at 40c. Im pissed off at some things but grateful for other things. It's better to focus on the good.
You should do too if you care about your mental health desu. Friendly advice to you, I dont care about the FUD since I usually dont frequent biz these days and usually dont click Link threads when I do

[Anonymous No.58482647]

>be a fud c u c k
>notice link autists point out juicy details
>"link cant do that its a scam!"
>link announces its doing exactly that
>"its a nothingburger"
>stick to price action FUD because there is nothing left

[Anonymous No.58482654]

[Anonymous No.58482656]

>>58482190
Literally the largest securities handler on the planet, which processes over $1,000,000,000,000,000
(Yes that is one QUADRILLION).

[Anonymous No.58482665]

>>58482656
wow, it must be worth so muc-

[Anonymous No.58482669]

Everything’s true….the rumors, the bread crumbs, the connections….

The last prediction is the singularity….will that come true too or are we trapped in a price limbo? My arms are so tired

[Anonymous No.58482673]

>>58482665
>>58482656

[Anonymous No.58482698]

>>58482627
The CCIP protocol product requires a fee to use. The fee is paid in Link. Are you quite new? Checkout the great info avails on the Chainlink website and blogposts. Welcome to the community!

[Anonymous No.58482700]

>>58482673
Value processed =/= marketcap or equity value of the processor, hence the point of my reply you fucking shitbrained faggot
Didn't Chainlink have like $6 trillion "Transaction value enabled" last year yet its market cap is only $8 billion? Same principle

[Anonymous No.58482710]

>>58482000
So what? None of this matters one bit.

You know what matters in crypto? Your name and logo. Is your name some variation of a dog? You win. It's not? you lose.
that's the extent of it. and chainlink loses.

[Anonymous No.58482713]

>>58482700
You need an actual cash flow model, you can't just say "1 quadrillion omg to the moon $81k" without sounding like a retard

[Anonymous No.58482727]

>>58482700
>>58482656

kek

[Anonymous No.58482732]

>>58482665
this has to be bait not even fud
do you even know how CCIP functions or what the earning mechanism of chainlink is

protip: token totally needed

[OCPD No.58482735]

>>58482713
you're putting a lot of pressure on chainlink to produce something of value when you have xrp at like 5x chainlinks market cap doing nothing

[Anonymous No.58482741]

>>58482732
the lad screeched like a bonobo of course they wouldn't highlight the obvious

[Anonymous No.58482756]

>>58482727
let me make it simpler for you: if my business facilitates the sale of a $10,000,000 house for a fee of $500, is my business worth $10,000,000?

>>58482732
yes but it's not worth $1 quadrillion obviously. $8 billion is actually overvalued. it's basically "priced for perfection" which is dangerous in investing.

>>58482735
and XRP has gone nowhere for the last 4 years, it shouldn't be worth what it is. neither should DOGE, ADA, TRX, NEAR, etc etc they are overvalued. what a low bar to compare your investment against

[Anonymous No.58482755]

>>58482420
I really hate this board and the current state of Link discussion. Thank you anon for pointing this out. We are still many years away and I hate the retards hyping up every pilot/exploration project because there some enterprise logos on the documents and Link is one of the only cryptos that might be not a complete useless scam.

>t. holding link since 2018

[Anonymous No.58482758]

Jeez you were spot on with the shorting BTC
Look at the chart. It fucking dumped hugely right on this news. It's totally true about using BTC to dump Link. That has to tell you a LOT about what Link is set to become.
Holy fuck, we're going to be so insanely wealthy

[Anonymous No.58482759]

>the actual implementation was very interesting in that it allowed the elimination of a huge amount of paper documents and spreadsheets and various things that were sent around between these asset managers
>orders of magnitude more efficient
>the conclusion of everybody is that the efficiency gain from this is massive
Sergey speaks:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdleEQ9Upig

[Anonymous No.58482776]

>>58482756
chainlink is ALREADY worth $8 billion, FOUR TIMES the equity of DTCC (which processes $1 quadrillion/year), and you're telling me chainlink is UNDERVALUED? Get a fucking grip.

[Anonymous No.58482784]

>>58482000
I predicted this back in 2018

[Anonymous No.58482807]

>>58482776
The DTCC processes $2.5 Quadrillion per year in transactions and Chainlink services will take a cut from each of these transactions. That's why you're here every day. We know.

[Anonymous No.58482814]

>>58482807
900+ million transactions yearly
and a fee of 0.075% if I remember right ?
it's pure insanity what sergey managed if we are honest
the other guy literally self replied, fuddies are going mentally insane

[Anonymous No.58482818]

>>58482784
can you please predict when we will pump

[Anonymous No.58482820]

>>58482784
>>/biz/thread/10446124

feels surreal looking back at it now. LINK was at 25 cents that day

[Anonymous No.58482829]

>>58482784
>6 years later
>market still hasn't figured out what we realized over half a decade ago
really makes me think

[Anonymous No.58482830]

>>58482784
we all thought it would matter. we were mistaken.

[Anonymous No.58482842]

>>58482784
based

[Anonymous No.58482859]

>>58482665
>>58482656
If LINK sees just one one thousandth of a percent in fees, this amounts to $1B per year.
And that is without any other applications of LINK.

[Anonymous No.58482860]

>>58482807
why do you think the DTCC itself is only worth $2.3 billion?

[Anonymous No.58482862]

>>58482360
I've seen people say I've never bought link before. I've seen people say I've bought the tippy top. This is the first time I've ever seen someone say I sold at $7. The lore you retards invent just to ignore the actual numbers in front of you really never ceases to amaze me. Does it originate from somewhere or do people just make it up on the fly?

[Anonymous No.58482866]

>>58482860
>>58482807
or do you even understand that? do you think the DTCC is "worth" multiples of $2.5 quadrillion?

[Anonymous No.58482873]

>>58482860
>only
>$2.3 billion
it made $1.8 billion in revenue in 2018

[Anonymous No.58482884]

>>58482873
yes, are you dishonest or do you not understand net income is different than revenue?

[Anonymous No.58482900]

>>58482884
you seem upset lmao
DTCC pilot was a huge success and here you are seething.
absolutely unsalvageable.

[Anonymous No.58482908]

>>58482000
really goes to show that all of the work chainlink does with public blockchains is entirely charitable and baggies are the pathetic equivalent of panhandlers

[Anonymous No.58482915]

>>58482900
looks like your brain shut down right before you were about to understand

[Anonymous No.58482920]

>>58482862
bro you're married, why the fuck are you still crying on discord and twitter 24/7 lmao

[Anonymous No.58482923]

>>58482915
what's your concern? That chainlink will power absolutely everything but that it will do so so efficiently that the Chainlnk token will be $9 and you'll still be here absolutely furious?

[Anonymous No.58482946]

>>58482923
sure, i'll grant you that. what now? my point remains

[Anonymous No.58482986]

>>58482279
>>58482305
>>58482406
>>58482509
>>58482665
>>58482700
>>58482713
>>58482756
>>58482776
>>58482860
>>58482866
>>58482884
>>58482915
>>58482946
LMAO LOL Look at this fuckwad doing damage control

[Anonymous No.58483000]

>>58482986
thanks for compiling these. anons please read through and respond, i'm curious what you think

[Anonymous No.58483035]

>>58483000
15 pbtid

You're losing your mind, aren't you?

[Anonymous No.58483036]

>>58483000
checked
>dtcc fud
>i'm curious what you think
i think ur mentally ill

[Anonymous No.58483048]

>>58483000
>i'm curious what you think
I think it's more likely that you're a paid fudder or a stockbasher rather than fudding for fun. A genuine bad actor, a dirty little weasel.

[Anonymous No.58483053]

>>58483035
>>58483036
these are not responses btw. i think it's clear no one here has done the work of figuring out what chainlink should be worth, instead you guys just throw out ballpark numbers without basis.

If DTCC processes $2.5 quadrillion/year, and it's only worth $2.3 billion, and chainlink is going to be more efficient / lower cost, then why would chainlink be worth more than $2.3 billion? Doesn't add up, it's the fundamental reason why chainlink never goes anywhere.

[Anonymous No.58483063]

>>58483048
Yes I'm the bad actor, not these retards clapping along to muh quadrillion

[Anonymous No.58483072]

Chainlink has always been a jewish lie

[Anonymous No.58483074]

>>58483053
>>58483063
this
literally designed to never pump

[Anonymous No.58483078]

>>58483053
You keep comparing Link to DTCC's equity/revenue, but all DTCC does is settlement.
Your comparison makes sense for XRP, but not for Link.

[Anonymous No.58483084]

>>58482114
just remember it was the exact same with amazon back in the day, people fudded it as that online book store thats insignificant
until the day it went to the moon and never came back

[Anonymous No.58483087]

>>58483078
Here we go. Explain

[Anonymous No.58483099]

>>58483087
Chainlink's use here is not settlement. It's not replacing DTCC.
Comparing equity worth is senseless.

[Anonymous No.58483102]

>>58483053
>figuring out what chainlink should be worth
i think we're long past that. how much should dog coin #256 be worth? how about frog coin? fuck you

[Anonymous No.58483115]

>>58483053
Chainlink will take a cut of the transactions. DTCC doesn't take a cut of each transaction. You're barking up the wrong tree

[Anonymous No.58483122]

>>58483102
This.
Imagine trying to pretend Chainlink is already valuable enough in terms of MC, when it's rank fucking 16 or whatever by MC.

[Anonymous No.58483133]

it is pumping, the singularity is NOW

[Anonymous No.58483139]

>>58483133
oh shit i didnt even notice. time to short the entire market

[Anonymous No.58483152]

>>58483133
>>58483139
SOMEBODY DO SOMETHING! DUMP BTC! DO ANYTHING!!!!! THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

[Anonymous No.58483169]

>>58483139
>>58483152
I'm pretty sure Bitcoin will dump on this, but I'm always hoping it won't.

[Anonymous No.58483228]

>>58483099
>>58483115
I have business to attend to. I'll be back.

[Anonymous No.58483229]

DOES ANYBODY HAVE GARY GENSLER'S NUMBER? MAYBE HE CAN RELEASE SOME FUD... MAYBE CHINA CAN BAN BITCOIN MINING AGAIN? TETHER FUD? ARE THERE ANY JEWISH SCAMS WE CAN CRASH AGAIN? WORLD WAR 3? SOMETHING? ANYTHING? PLEASE WE NEED TO STOP LINK FROM PUMPING IMMEDIATELY. I'M LITERALLY SHAKING RIGHT NOW AND SHIDDING AND FARDING IN MY PANTS PLEASE. SOMEBODY. DO. SOMETHING. NOW!!!!!

[Anonymous No.58483241]

>>58483229
>>58483152
>blistering, face melting 1% pump

lmao pathetic linkoid

[Anonymous No.58483256]

>>58483228
They got some more scripted fud for you to review? Better familiarise yourself so you at least sound like you know what you’re talking about huh?

[Anonymous No.58483260]

Jannies just deleted the Link mooning thread. Typical.

[Anonymous No.58483272]

lol the pump is running out of steam already this coin is just pathetic

[Anonymous No.58483290]

>>58482920
I don't really shitpost on discord anymore. My marriage is going well though, much better than my garden this year. Thanks for inquiring.

Tell everybody in CLU I said hello. There are some good people still posting there.

[Anonymous No.58483297]

>>58483087
CCIP requires transactions are paid for in LINK and is what DTCC and all these banks are going to use to connect to blockchains and process transactions. I don't get why this is so hard for you to understand? It has nothing to do with DTCC's revenue or business model. That's like you have a company that uses Salesforce for their sales funnel and then question why Salesforce is a bigger company driving more revenue than the company using them. What kind of inane shit is that?

[Anonymous No.58483315]

>>58483290
>good people
fake moralist

[Anonymous No.58483317]

>>58483297
volume in the future SHOULD be partially redistributed to stakers in the future as well. just 2 more years until version 0.2.5!

[Anonymous No.58483374]

I last night I dreamt that Chainlink just revealed a gigantic partnership, the main colours of the page was dark green, dark blue and red on a beige background
Lo and behold, this actually manifested into reality
We are all in this together

[Anonymous No.58483385]

>>58483272

[Anonymous No.58483386]

>>58483374
Amazing. I dreamed I was wearing a white dress shirt but it belonged to someone else, and I had to return it to the owner, but the gala was tomorrow. I took the shirt off and just had a t-shirt underneath and was worried I wouldn't look the part.
Some sort of imposter syndrome dream. The "gala" being tomorrow makes a lot of sense right now.

[Anonymous No.58483401]

>>58483374
"it was once revealed to me in a dream" reminds me of this set of bloopers from Eastbound & Down which is one of my favourite clips ever
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hPp4dgmrc8

[Anonymous No.58483416]

>>58483386
anon I shit you not I was just writing out a dream I had some weeks ago of all the OGs were at a Gala and Sergey was congratulating each of us. My cats were there for whatever reason and started meowing, it was kino af. We're going to fucking make it, unreal we dreamt the same thing.

[Anonymous No.58483421]

>>58483416
I for one, cannot fucking wait for the gala. You will know me because I will wear a red carnation in my buttonhole along with my blue and white striped bowtie and we shall feast and drink as brothers in arms anons.

[Anonymous No.58483425]

>>58483416
>My cats were there for whatever reason and started meowing, it was kino af
top kek
please don't bring your cats to smartcon anon

[Anonymous No.58483444]

>>58482486
>>58482631
If you got in during 2017-2018, its is impossible not to be comfy. Outside of BTC, there is no more sure bet in crypto, just stake and forget and whoops a few years later turns out youre a decamillionaire

[Anonymous No.58483453]

i wonder why cll didnt raise staking caps and increase the apy for proper distribution of tokens instead of dumping on us while we wait for proper dynamic yield. staking is such a joke right now that hopefully pays off with build rewards, just compare it to everything else going on in defi at the moment

[Anonymous No.58483500]

Lo! ’t is a gala night
Within the lonesome latter years!
An angel throng, bewinged, bedight
In veils, and drowned in tears,
Sit in a theatre, to see
A play of hopes and fears,
While the orchestra breathes fitfully
The music of the spheres.

Mimes, in the form of God on high,
Mutter and mumble low,
And hither and thither fly—
Mere puppets they, who come and go
At bidding of vast formless things
That shift the scenery to and fro,
Flapping from out their Condor wings
Invisible Wo!

That motley drama—oh, be sure
It shall not be forgot!
With its Phantom chased for evermore
By a crowd that seize it not,
Through a circle that ever returneth in
To the self-same spot,
And much of Madness, and more of Sin,
And Horror the soul of the plot.

But see, amid the mimic rout,
A crawling shape intrude!
A blood-red thing that writhes from out
The scenic solitude!
It writhes!—it writhes!—with mortal pangs
The mimes become its food,
And seraphs sob at vermin fangs
In human gore imbued.

Out—out are the lights—out all!
And, over each quivering form,
The curtain, a funeral pall,
Comes down with the rush of a storm,
While the angels, all pallid and wan,
Uprising, unveiling, affirm
That the play is the tragedy, “Man,”
And its hero, the Conqueror Worm.

[Anonymous No.58483568]

>>58483444
Checked trips of fortune. Setted and forgetted. Imagine selling Link because some salty asshole whined every day kek not gonna happen

[Anonymous No.58483606]

I bought around 2500 link back in the day around 40 cents and sold everything on the way up to ath. Just made my first real buy since then! feels good to be back

[Anonymous No.58483719]

>>58483444
nigger do you not know what all in means? i have my whole net worth in this shit fuck the fat ass

[Anonymous No.58483779]

>>58483719
you were supposed to be improving yourself to prepare for the singularity, not sit on your ass looking at charts

[Anonymous No.58483799]

>>58483453
It’ll be worth it when Link goes to $100,000 a coin.

[Anonymous No.58483842]

>>58482669
yes it's all true except the one single important part for all of us here

[Anonymous No.58483856]

>>58483799
of course, but that doesnt change the fact that they could be doing so much more with it. the current iteration feels amateur and is lining sergeys/hr roasties pockets more than ours

[Anonymous No.58483953]

>>58482524
My life is not devoid of joy. I'm not poor either. I'm bag holding 25k Link tokens that I thought would change my life. I just got a raise at work and now make $290k base salary.

The anon to which you're replying is right. Perhaps we were all a little naive about the overall traditional finance space, but many of us have been bag holding for nearly 7 full years and all we have to show for it are press releases about proofs of concept. We still don't have a single, viable, real world product for anything in web3 and most of us see through the BS charade at this point and aren't excited about "proofs of concept". Chainlink has become another BS tech company that doesn't make money...except instead of holding shares in it, we hold a shitcoin that you can use to pay for the useless services (if you want to, you can also pay in native tokens if you prefer).

[Anonymous No.58484036]

>>58482000
>pilot

kek baggies

[Anonymous No.58484106]

>>58483953
ok but you made a 100x in those 7 years so you must be pretty euphoric

[Anonymous No.58484183]

>>58482034
AHAHHAHAHHAAHA YOU WISH YOU WERE RIGHT

[Anonymous No.58484204]

>>58484106
>100x in those 7 years so you must be pretty euphoric
it's never enough for some

[Anonymous No.58484228]

>>58482420
Doge is #9 solely because it was tweeted by Musk's retarded ass, kill yourself for fudding

[Anonymous No.58484232]

>>58483953
>25k link microstack
>$290k base salary
you should be market buying LINK every week wtf are you complaining about, literal dream situation to have that much dry powder with LINK so cheap

[Anonymous No.58484244]

>>58482000
This news actually pumping price

[Anonymous No.58484253]

>>58482152
You were saying?

[Anonymous No.58484259]

>>58482152
Up 14% on the daily

[Anonymous No.58484265]

WTFWT®

[Anonymous No.58484268]

>>58482152
WTFWT

[Anonymous No.58484287]

>>58484232
>15.50
>cheap
way over priced at the moment. market is about to take a huge dump after good news. under $10 is a good price.

[Anonymous No.58484317]

>>58484287
Dude its still cheap below $150 wild that different people can have such different opinions on the value of an intangible "thing" isnt it?

[Anonymous No.58484446]

>>58482000
checked, my only regret is we couldnt wait one more week so I could buy more at sub $20

[Anonymous No.58484455]

>>58484287

[Anonymous No.58484468]

>>58484455
Within the following 6 years, BTC did a 2500x to $20k. Chainlink will never be $20k per token.

I used to believe in all of this pie in the sky nonsense. Then I started working in the web3 industry and getting familiar with the space.

[Anonymous No.58484471]

>>58484468
Chainlink will never be $20k a token because it will wostraight from $10k to $30k.

[Anonymous No.58484484]

It's honestly truly sad watching everyone excitedly post about a 10% pump to $15.

Chainlink breached $15 nearly 4 full years ago :/. That was an exciting time. When that jew Portnoy was posting about Link and everything still seemed believable and made sense. Those were the days.

Actually looking back, the first 50% of my holding Chainlink was pretty much all interesting and exciting and the second 50% has essentially been the reality settling in.

[Anonymous No.58484492]

>>58484484
its because it pumping when everything else is dumping, not the same, also kys

[Anonymous No.58484497]

>jannoids brought in email verification purely to shut the board down in the lead up to the DTCC announcement

[Anonymous No.58484498]

>>58484471
Hah, yea

[Anonymous No.58484506]

>>58484468
>web3
Lol

[Anonymous No.58484509]

>>58482305
>Jason Parser
This is one of us. Shit it's probably you screencapping yourself.

[Anonymous No.58484515]

>>58484492
FTM is up more on the weekly. Chainlink is at a lower price than it was 4 weeks ago...

Maybe most people interested in Link nowadays really are just retarded at this point.

[Anonymous No.58484530]

>>58484515
>price gongo up... is le bad
i think you might be the retarded one

[Anonymous No.58484532]

>>58484506
Sorry:
>software that employs a DLT and other decentralized, consensus-driven mechanisms in its architecture

I should have remembered that there is always an insufferable faggot here nitpicking terms, nomenclature, how posts are spaced, etc. I shouldn't have used a popularly-adopted term. Thanks Anon.

[Anonymous No.58484533]

>>58484515
biz doesn't hold $50 million worth of FTM, that's the difference.

[Anonymous No.58484556]

>>58484530
>>58484533
Ok, I concede. You guys are right. I am now elated about this proof of concept that Chainlink participated in. This one is categorically different than the other proofs of concept and is the launchpad for the singularity to 1k EOY. Furthermore, this time is different than the previous 10 times this year that Chainlink breached $15. I don't think we're excited enough actually!

[Anonymous No.58484571]

>>58484556
me too bro, pumped af. wagmi

[Anonymous No.58484590]

>>58484556
I knew you'd come around

[Anonymous No.58484594]

>dtcc employee uploads a fake webpage with a made up pdf to the company website to pump his bags
desperate

[Anonymous No.58484656]

Will you fags stop ruining the thread giving the twitter namefag the attention he craves?

[Anonymous No.58484686]

>>58484468
>Then I started working in the web3 industry and getting familiar with the space.
tell me more
do you work with Ethereum?

[Anonymous No.58484708]

>>58484484
You could have loaded up at 5 and 6, you had MONTHS AND MONTHS to load up on what was the most obvious X2 or x3 in the history of investing. You know, you could have say bought 100$ with of link at 5, or 20 link tokens. Those 20 link tokens you could now sell for 310. That's easy money bro

[Anonymous No.58484715]

>>58484556
atta boy! See you all at the yacht party

[Anonymous No.58484718]

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Anonymous No.58484747]

>>58482000
wow! I can't believe they're going to use Chainlink's (Ticker: LINK) json parsing technology for their beta pilots! I'm sure it requires a large stockpile of LINK tokens needed to scrape web data, right? It's not like any device with an internet connection could do it, after all

[Anonymous No.58484758]

>>58484708
lol, in that time frame I got an 8x off Axelar and a 20x off Dynex and turned $30k into $400k (am still bag holding some of each).

[Anonymous No.58484762]

>>58482134
Actually the 30% of the US economy that is driven by financial firms knows what swift is too

[Anonymous No.58484780]

We are currently #3 on the top posts of the day on /r/cryptocurrency the biggest crypto subreddit

[Anonymous No.58484782]

>>58483315
>fake moralist
Take your meds.

[Anonymous No.58484790]

>>58484497
Obviously, same with archives going to shit.
>LINK mints millionaire meets
>Evidence of their shitposting for a decade about becoming millionaires
>Extreme racism, antisemitism, and most other isms
>People start asking questions
Even suggesting it was to suppress LINK discussion instantly had "anons" shouting you down.
Even ITT fuddies are STILL trying to stifle discussion.

[Anonymous No.58484799]

>>58484780
>47 upvotes
>80% of the posters are shameless /biz/ fags
Holy Kek what a shitty post that is

[Anonymous No.58484809]

>DTCC
>connecting to all blockchains through abstraction layer
>direct usage of chainlink
I....is it safe to kek?

[Anonymous No.58484833]

>>58484758
So why do you care about link???

[Anonymous No.58484843]

>>58482000
As if news of this caliber would make a single difference for chainlink's price.

[Anonymous No.58484894]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eXmW9jJIHw

[Anonymous No.58484901]

THREAD THEME SONG

https://odysee.com/@FakeAlexJones:0/Lambo-Dreams:9

[Anonymous No.58484905]

>>58484894
>curry meater
>no longer cum eater
is this bullish or bearish?

[Anonymous No.58485153]

were on joomberg boys

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2024-05-16/connecting-real-world-to-any-blockchain-video

boomers better pump our bags this month

[Anonymous No.58485258]

>>58482000
didn't you know by now that in the crypto space a 'partnership' means they have e.g. done a transaction using that bank before?

[Anonymous No.58485277]

>>58482818
soon
>>58482820
good times
>>58482829
the singularity pump is still ahead of us
>>58482830
chainlink was always a 20 year hold

[Anonymous No.58485280]

>>58485258

[Anonymous No.58485357]

>>58484782
chainlink is moral
you are not

[Anonymous No.58485405]

HARDCORE

[Anonymous No.58485432]

>>58485405
lol

[Anonymous No.58485443]

>>58482000
It's still pumping wtf man

[Anonymous No.58485468]

I'm so happy for you crazy kids

[OCPD No.58485538]

>>58485443
the 2-3 day anon was right all along

[Anonymous No.58485541]

The timeline for moving from a successful pilot to real-world implementation of a new technology, such as the Smart NAV pilot using Chainlink’s CCIP with DTCC, depends on several factors including regulatory approval, integration complexity, industry readiness, and the results of the pilot itself. However, based on typical innovation cycles in the financial services industry, here are some general estimates:

Short-Term (1-2 Years)
Regulatory Approval and Compliance:

If the pilot demonstrates clear benefits and compliance with regulatory standards, the next step would be to work closely with regulators to ensure all legal and compliance requirements are met. This can be a lengthy process but is crucial for widespread adoption in the financial industry.
Initial Deployments and Integrations:

Early adopters among the pilot participants (such as asset managers and service providers) might start integrating the new technology into their systems. This phase often involves limited, controlled deployments to ensure that the technology works as expected in a real-world environment.
Infrastructure and Scaling:

Developing the necessary infrastructure to support large-scale use and ensuring that the solution can scale to handle the volume of transactions typical for DTCC and other financial institutions.

[Anonymous No.58485544]

>>58485541
Medium-Term (2-5 Years)
Broader Industry Adoption:

After initial deployments prove successful, broader industry adoption can begin. This includes onboarding additional financial institutions, asset managers, and service providers. Education and training programs might be necessary to help stakeholders understand and integrate the new technology.
Refinement and Optimization:

Continuous refinement of the technology based on feedback from initial deployments. This might include optimizing performance, improving user interfaces, and adding new features.
Expansion to Additional Use Cases:

As confidence in the technology grows, it can be expanded to cover more use cases beyond the initial scope. For instance, other types of financial instruments and data can be integrated into the system.

[Anonymous No.58485547]

>>58485544
Long-Term (5-10 Years)
Global Standardization:

For widespread adoption, industry standards and best practices need to be developed. Organizations like DTCC, along with industry consortiums and standard-setting bodies, will play a crucial role in this process.
Integration with Legacy Systems:

Full integration with existing legacy systems across the financial industry, ensuring seamless interoperability between new blockchain-based systems and traditional financial infrastructure.
Widespread Global Adoption:

If the technology proves to be robust, secure, and beneficial, it could see widespread adoption globally, transforming how financial data is managed and transmitted across different networks.
Factors Influencing the Timeline
Regulatory Environment:

Financial technology innovations often require extensive regulatory review. Regulatory clarity and supportive policies can accelerate adoption.
Technical Challenges:

The complexity of integrating blockchain technology with existing financial systems can pose significant technical challenges.
Market Readiness:

The readiness of the market to adopt new technologies, including the willingness of financial institutions to invest in and transition to new systems.
Pilot Results:

The outcomes of the pilot phase, including any issues encountered and the effectiveness of proposed solutions, will significantly influence the timeline.
Conclusion
Assuming the pilot goes well and there are no significant regulatory or technical roadblocks, we could see initial real-world use of the technology within 1-2 years, broader adoption and refinement within 2-5 years, and widespread global adoption within 5-10 years. The exact timeline will depend on how quickly regulatory approvals are obtained, how seamlessly the technology can be integrated into existing systems, and the overall readiness of the financial industry to adopt and scale the new solution.

[Anonymous No.58485548]

>>58485541
oh great another thread about a random ass shitcoin just what i needed to see today i mean seriously how many of these things are there now bitcoin ethereum cardano solana and now chainlink is the new hotness it's getting harder and harder to tell them apart and they all seem to be promising the same thing

[Anonymous No.58485630]

>>58483229
One of the best posts I've read this month. You should make more.

Can someone make a Chainlink edit of this scene where Team FUD can't suppress Chainlink any longer and all the falling debris are the altcoins/shitcoins/FTX crashing around us as we are pulled up into $1000 after 6 years of waiting?:
https://youtu.be/D6_ZC6BywXs?feature=shared&t=66

[Anonymous No.58486471]

>>58482305
>@fagfinance
of course you follow and believe a total cum guzzling faggot. Stay poor, so I don't have to see you in the same social circles.

[Anonymous No.58486473]

>>58484497
The timing was awfully coincidental wasn’t it

[Anonymous No.58486557]

>>58485541
lol 10 more years before real world use linkies

[Anonymous No.58486576]

>>58486473
Well there was an insider post a few days ago that warned not to short link. There are real connected people posting here. I bet they are the ones spreading FUD normally.

[Anonymous No.58487596]

>>58482000
Oracles are super based!

[Anonymous No.58487609]

>>58486576
>work for chainlink labs
>already made it
>will become bazillionaire if link price goes up
>I will spend my free time fudding link on 4chan
Why would they fud? I geniuinely dont understand that.

[Anonymous No.58487697]

>>58485541
>>58485544
>>58485547
>JUST 10 MORE YEARS MARINES

[Anonymous No.58487909]

>>58487697
I dgaf -if it gets to $100 before that (which you confirm it will) i have no money concerns for the rest of my days and neither will my children. Above that, it's just obscene wealth.
Thanks for playing

[Anonymous No.58488530]

>>58485405
Wow
Haven’t seen that one in ages

[Anonymous No.58489610]

>>58485541
>>58485544
I think these time frames need to account for the near seven years of work that has already been done directly with SWIFT. We are closer than people think.
>>58485547
Reasonable. I would say it is reasonable that full utilization will take even longer.
>>58487697
It will be over $100 in 1-2 years and all you had to do was not be a dick sucking nigger in order to profit from this, but you chose faggot aids.

[Anonymous No.58490286]

>>58482000
wow THE dtcc? THE dtcc that handles QUADRILLIONS of dollars??
>check price
>+2% (still down 90% and barely in the top 20)
epic!!! congrats on holding the line

[Anonymous No.58491303]

>>58482000
checked I saw on fidelity: "T+1 coming soon down from T+2"

[Anonymous No.58491545]

>>58487909
this
we have to realize that link going to triple digits like $100 or even $300 dollars will happen sooner than expected
full adaption and the 5+ years will lead to five digits per token, most of the board would be elite tier rich in such scenario but could enjoy live to its fullest even before

[Anonymous No.58491559]

>>58482860
kek mr dumdum try do the finance :D:D

[Anonymous No.58492105]

>>58482417
Kek what is this degeneracy of a picture with text

[Anonymous No.58492199]

Please don't post negative about Link! I fear it will dissuade other investors from buying. It's ok if you don't like it anymore, but please don't make it our problem by bringing negative sentiment, it's bad enough as it is

[Anonymous No.58492223]

These recent events confirm that no amount of developments or news will ever pump link.
I have accepted this but I’m never fucking selling.

[Anonymous No.58492228]

>>58490286
Still outperforming Eth and has done for over a year

[Anonymous No.58492246]

>>58492199
Link is unpumpable SHIT

[Anonymous No.58492254]

>>58492246
So was your mother but it never stopped your father, unfortunately

[Anonymous No.58492285]

>>58492254
T. Sad bagholder

[Anonymous No.58492302]

>>58486576
there are both, there are good and bad who want the power distributed and the evil people who don't want any of the autists who value fairness in as large holders of the future of contracts
recently i have came to the realization that link is bigger than I had ever imagined.
literally the future of the Roman Civil Law Empire controlled by the Khazarian Mob

[Anonymous No.58492317]

>>58492285
>sad
never been happier in my life. Up to my neck in staked Link and loving the ride. If you feel depressed you'll see negativity everywhere you look, my dude aka projecting

[Anonymous No.58492331]

>>58484106
would you trade seen years for anything less then a million dollars, you cant be this stupid

[Anonymous No.58492337]

>>58492331
he never traded the years for anything though. he lived them. wtf you on about

[Anonymous No.58492341]

>>58492337
money = energy. Bag holding link for seven years =bag holding seven years worth of energy/life force. Would you trade your youth for for something less then 1 million dollars?

[Anonymous No.58492360]

>>58492341
>doing nothing and leaving a portfolio alone while getting on with your life and then retiring early as a wealthy man = losing 7 years of 'life force'
the state of this guy lmao

[Anonymous No.58492420]

>>58492341
I didn't trade my youth for anything. I invested a few thousand dollars into Bitcoin in 2015 and was lucky enough to go all in LINK at the $20k BTC peak in 2017. I bought a big beach house and I've been having the time of my life (haven't worked a day in 5 years). I know what's coming is inevitable. I'll be going from 7 figures to 8 figures in the next couple years. Me and my family will never have to worry about finances and I'm living life on easy mode.

How's your life by the way? Spending it on biz fudding LINK?

[Anonymous No.58492449]

>>58492420
awesome head cannon

[Anonymous No.58492547]

>>58492449
You should use a head cannon.

[Anonymous No.58492558]

>>58492547
kek

[Anonymous No.58492591]

>>58492420
How much link did / do you have?

[Anonymous No.58493545]

>>58482172
the oracle that always dump. just focused on pyth and coming oracles like supraoracles and redstone.

[Anonymous No.58493969]

>>58485547
so theres the slow way and theres the fast way

[Anonymous No.58494412]

>>58485405
>rhombus was controlled opposition

[Anonymous No.58495083]

>>58492420
Oh yeah? Thats nothing. I shorted link from $50 to $5 at 100x leverage and made so much that i bought a private island which I built an amusement park and castle on. Been fucking 2 women at the same time every day for years now. I'm in elite insider circles and I get a heads up whenever my bitcoin whale buddies I play poker with are dumping link. Cya later, gotta catch my private jet to Monaco, it's almost yacht season.

[Anonymous No.58495424]

>>58492341
>money = energy. Bag holding link for seven years =bag holding seven years worth of energy/life force
sounds to me like you are projecting your failure to do something with your life for the past 7 years lmao, kill yourself worthless nigger, thats what you get for buying the top you subhuman reddit tourist

[Anonymous No.58495457]

>>58492420
Nice. I got in at the ICO but didn't flip the switch and go all in until around 2019. Wish i'd known about this forum sooner. 60k staked now, which i'm happy with. We're insanely close now.

[Anonymous No.58496120]

>>58495083
Oh yeah? Thats nothing. I shorted link from $50 to $1.00 at 10,000x leverage and made so much that i bought a private castle which I built an island on, then build another castle on that and then built an amusement park on top of that. Been fucking 2 women once every year. I get head whenever my bitcoin whale buddies I play poker with are dumping. Cya later, gotta catch my private jeet to Mumbai, it's almost toilet season.

[Anonymous No.58496167]

>DUDE just baghold this scam ICO token for another 10 yeaers
nah think ill just get twice as rich buying cat tokens in 1/10th the time

lmfao @ linktards, borderline XRP copers at this point