REQ Thread: Interstellar Edition

[Anonymous No.7687407]

With all this coinbase fud, expect money to pour into REQ. Good luck to those who aren't in already

[Anonymous No.7687522]

Waiting for the biweekly dump to double my stack

[Anonymous No.7687598]

If mainnet releases tomorrow you'd be an idiot to dump

[Anonymous No.7687634]

>>7687598
Day trading req is playing with fire

[Anonymous No.7687644]

>>7687598
It won't be mainnet tomorrow check their github
Need a good dump so i can bring my stack to 30K

[Anonymous No.7687675]

>>7687644
Req will hit $100 EoY congrats anon. I'm trying to scrape together 10k but I'm not proficient at daytrading>>7687407
And OP req is the new coinbase

[Anonymous No.7687689]

>>7687675
>Req will hit $100 EoY
that's a bold claim brother

[Anonymous No.7687696]

>>7687644
Not all of us can read code my mans and yes $100 EoY is possible >>7687675

[Anonymous No.7687767]

Where were you guys when it was $0.06?

[Anonymous No.7687773]

>>7687644
I don't think that they will release mainnet tomorrow, but I also don't think they'd push *that* commit into the public repo before announcing a date.
Holding a modest stack of 8k bought under ICO

[Anonymous No.7687777]

Honestly, this couldn't have been better timing. And yeah, I'm hoping the upcoming update is big news

[Anonymous No.7687781]

>>7687689
Following a successful road map and token burning not at all

[Anonymous No.7687806]

>>7687773
what was the ICO price of REQ?

[Anonymous No.7687815]

>>7687777

holy quads. checked

> tfw only holding 10k req

will i make it?

[Anonymous No.7687819]

>>7687777
The prophecy

[Anonymous No.7687826]

>tfw 50/50 in REQ and LINK

Pretty nice knowing I'll be a millionaire in a year or two

[Anonymous No.7687856]

>>7687815
That will net you one million end of year

>REQ will be $100 EoY

[Anonymous No.7687866]

>>7687777
Chcked quads of unimaginably good news
>inb4 hey guys.. coinbase used REQ as a backend and that's what caused the double spends, w-we're sorry

[Anonymous No.7687875]

>>7687826

you'll be a half millionaire. Link isn't even in the same realm as req potential wise.

[Anonymous No.7687886]

>>7687826
Anon could you shill me link or direct me to someone good reading? I know REQ and link are allies

[Anonymous No.7687933]

Should i buy now or wait for the next Bitcoin dip? I will buy more 5k REQ.

[Anonymous No.7687942]

>>7687886
>>7650949

[Anonymous No.7687940]

>>7687856

ok let's be real, REQ isn't going to be 100$. That would be a market cap of close to 65 billion, which would put it in the number 3 spot. Maybe if everything goes perfectly and adoption is huge, otherwise we are not going to be even near 100$ and I'm saying this a req holder. It's a good coin but you're really stretching it, be reasonable or we are going to look like the LINK "muh 1000$ cube" holders

[Anonymous No.7687964]

>>7687940
Is 20USD realistic?

[Anonymous No.7687972]

>>7687806
Can't quite remember, something like 0.0002 ETH per token

[Anonymous No.7688028]

>>7687940
I can't see why it couldn't be top 3rd or 4th if things go really well and it scales up to it.

[Anonymous No.7688032]

>>7687964

it depends:

worst case, developers leave - 10 cents

bad year - 3-4$

decent/neutral year - 8$

amazing year - 15-20$

req becomes as popular as paypal/venmo - 50+$

[Anonymous No.7688043]

>>7687875

I hold both, but I actually disagree. I think about this often. I compre the two projects alot even though they have different use cases because they came out around the same time

[Anonymous No.7688045]

>>7687940
>close to 65 billion
>top 3
oh yeah cause the entire market isn't going to grow too over the year

[Anonymous No.7688081]

>>7687806
5 cents

[Anonymous No.7688119]

>>7688028
>>7688045

yes I understand the scaling argument, but there a lot of shitcoins out there and also most of the money is going to flow into the top 10. If request network team makes an amazing, easy to use app, and markets the shit out of it, yeah it could reach the top 5. but that is a lot of "ifs" that have to go well for this to happen.

[Anonymous No.7688122]

>>7688043
Don't worry fellow marine that fag knows nothing
t. Holding 5k LINK as well

[Anonymous No.7688142]

>>7688119
>there are a lot of shitcoins out there
yeah, shitcoins that do absolutely nothing except BETTER BUTTCOIN LAWL!
REQ actually has a use

[Anonymous No.7688200]

>>7687767
Already in.

[Anonymous No.7688201]

>>7688043
>>7688122

nothing wrong with you disagreeing, but req is a project that could lead to customer2business and business2business transactions, using crypto (or even fiat if they so choose) all in an easy venmo type format. That has huge applications and potential.

Link on the other hand is only really meant for companies/nodes to use, and the whole smart contract/oracle thing is solving a problem that really doesn't exist.

Bottom line is, you could explain how and why REQ works to anyone. The only people who are going to understand link though are crypto autists like us, I do not see LINK being adopted at all, also sergey can't even code. The amount of shilling for it is also a bad sign to me

[Anonymous No.7688236]

>>7687644

Sold now (wanted to grab a few other bargains and couldn't wait any longer), rebuying the dip tomorrow. Hope I didn't miss time it too badly.

[Anonymous No.7688249]

>>7688201

forgot to add, req can also be used P2P style which is another huge use case.

[Anonymous No.7688289]

>>7688201
Yeah the LINK shilling is a huge warning sign. As a Dapp writer, I do love the idea but I don't think LINK is the one to deliver it.

[Anonymous No.7688295]

>>7688236
What if it's big news tomorrow dude? It's probably not, but why risk it? Even REQ saying they are on track for their roadmap would be really good news, as it's getting closer and closer to mainnet now they're basically confirming a date. Not to mention coinbase may be using the request platform as the backend for coinbase commerce.

[Anonymous No.7688382]

>>7688295
It's a risk, but that's what you have to do to accumulate a lot. It's educated gambling.

[Anonymous No.7688687]

Expect modest news tomorrow lads.

REQ FOMO will only start in late spring, when the entire market is going to be exploding and the main net has been delivered.

I'm going to hold it until the implement the cross-currency conversions. That alone makes REQ more valuable than anything else in the top 20 on CMC.

This is our year.

[Anonymous No.7688721]

>>7688382
Yeah this, gotta take risks. Worst comes to the worst I buy back in and take a small hit. And REQ isn't the only big play - I really need to get in on others.

I'm pretty confident it'll sell the news even if it is good news anyway.

[Anonymous No.7688742]

>>7687819
Holy fucking shit, quads. 7's. Buying a shitton more

[Anonymous No.7689311]

>>7687866
delet

[Anonymous No.7689433]

I know what time they release their news. Smiley face

[Anonymous No.7689478]

>>7687806
5 cents but it dipped to 3 cents because it was released at a bad time.

[Anonymous No.7689500]

>>7687866
Actual quality fud. Makes you think

[Anonymous No.7689549]

>>7687767
In your mom's ass.

[Anonymous No.7690181]

>>7687875
Request is going to be using Chainlink, you dope! Go ahead, look it up.

[Anonymous No.7690270]

>>7690181

> look it up bro

no you faggot, I'm not going to look it up, if you want to argue it then you post the reason why. Also, if you're implying that request network needs or even wants chainlink to operate you are a dumbass.

[Anonymous No.7690419]

>>7690270
They actually did mention chainlink as an option in their blog though

[Anonymous No.7690531]

>>7690270
Do I have you show you how to use a Google search just to make a point? Kek, I don't care about you, stay ignorant AND poor if you like!

[Anonymous No.7690632]

>>7687675
if you truly believe that you should sell everything you have and go all in.

[Anonymous No.7690664]

>>7687781
You really think token burn will be significant when the thing will have barely gotten started yet? Get real dude. Assuming everything goes well we will see $10 EOY, maybe $100 the year after that.