You better get in very, very fucking soon

[Anonymous No.8612062]

Don’t say nobody warned you, Bitcoin is stabilizing and this will give alts room to flourish. This is a platform specifically made for payment based dApps. No crypto kitties, no Etheremon. PAYMENT BASED DAPPS. DO YOU FUCKING HEAR ME?

That means you can have MULTIPLE businesses using the REQ platform to build a “pay with request” button, for example. They’ll be completing with each other. Company A might focus on fiat development, company B might focus on real estate. They’ll ALL be using the platform and ALL transactions done through THEIR businesses will make YOUR tokens more valuable. Retards don’t understand this, when you invest in a stock, you are investing in one SINGULAR business to do well. When you buy REQ tokens, whether a business succeeds OR fails, the total supply of REQ tokens SHRINKS, and there is an automated process to BUY more tokens, meaning demand for your token goes UP as supply goes down.

God traditional investors are so, so fucking dumb. It’s comical how fucking dumb they are that they’re not getting in on this literal money printer, instead opting for safe 1 percent returns. Lmfao. The gnashing of teeth of people that study investments for hours and hours that will get ROIcucked by me as I sit in a chair with my hand on my dick. Feels so fucking amazing.

A small, fixed percentage of every transaction that goes through on the REQ based GDAX, the REQ based PayPal, the REQ based auditing service, the REQ based ecommerce store, will be used to buy REQ tokens at market rate and then literally delete them from existence. The volume is going to be out of this world. The supply of REQ tokens will dry up faster than you can blink, nobody will be selling these for years to the humans that are demanding them because they’re such good investments. People will be paying hundreds of dollars for just one of my hundreds of thousands of tokens. God it’s going to feel fucking amazing, like the first time you had sex with your crush under the stars.

[Anonymous No.8612087]

>>8612062

[Anonymous No.8612100]

>>8612087
Fpbp

[Anonymous No.8612111]

Stop shilling this shit. It will grow organically through real world adoption. No reason to try and make /biz/ residents adopt it.

[Anonymous No.8612144]

>>8612087
I take it you’re a Chainlink investor? Lol. A “staking” token, right? Lmao. Worthless as shit to institutions, businesses do not trust children with that buy Link with their mothers credit card to be reliable nodes. Moreover, businesses will not want to spend real money on nodes because the price of this investment is so volatile, why buy now when you could get it for 30% cheaper in a month? The REQ team has a BRIALLIANT understanding of cryptoeconomics, and that’s why this won’t be a problem. REQ will have real world usage, Link will forever be a fat man’s pipe dream and the last chance for hundreds of neckbeards to do something successful for once in their lives. Don’t say I didn’t warn you, this could be your actual last chance.

[Anonymous No.8612168]

>>8612062
Is current price good?

[Anonymous No.8612180]

>only have 2k

[Anonymous No.8612182]

>>8612111
Of course it will, I’m just trying to help my fellow /biz/newsmen see the light. They won’t have any significant impact on the market if they go out and buy right now, there’s still time to accumulate, but not much.

[Anonymous No.8612202]

>be CEO of giant corporation
>receive a money transfer worth millions of dollars using REQ
>it’s worth a few thousand an hour after I receive it.

crypto is a joke

[Anonymous No.8612207]

>>8612182
Basically until Mid June G20 regulations deadline? IE Binance in Malta and taking fiat paitings?

[Anonymous No.8612209]

>>8612062
>Bitcoin is stabilizing

[Anonymous No.8612215]

>>8612202
Solid bait

[Anonymous No.8612246]

I'm currently investigating where the burned tokens actually go. I'm almost certain they're not actually burned but funneled into an ethereum slush fund. I'll keep you guys updated as I find more.

[Anonymous No.8612253]

>>8612202
You short sighted faggot. No, your transaction will be worth 100 btc or whatever. There will be no fucking USD or fiat. The future will be measured in crypto.

[Anonymous No.8612264]

>>8612246
I just got a text saying half my coins got burned, any info on this would be of great help. thanks anon

[Anonymous No.8612266]

>>8612202
Backwards.
>Req is worth more after every transaction.

[Anonymous No.8612296]

>>8612087
I like req too but fucking KEK that pic

[Anonymous No.8612307]

I feel like I already made it just buying this, before it even goes up. I've been in BTC since 2014 and never have I been so sure of a crypto. The majority of this market is speculation, look at Vechain's price. When REQ releases a working product in a few days you are gonna see some serious fucking FOMO.

[Anonymous No.8612323]

>>8612207
If you have a specific date in mind chances are others do as well, so you need to get in before others would consider it early.

[Anonymous No.8612328]

>>8612111

This.

Let the drooling idiots on here have fun with their TRX and VEN Chink scams.

[Anonymous No.8612338]

>>8612307
I believe REQ has a future and will be one if not THE biggest crypto project but I don't expect it to be within a couple of years and especially not in the next couple of months as a lot of Dapps still need to be build on top of it.

[Anonymous No.8612372]

>>8612338
this. it will take a while for mass adoption to happen. but once it does, it will be beautiful.

[Anonymous No.8612383]

Will i make it by 2022 with 34 000req?
And what could possibly be the end game? Like what could possibly be the value in 2025 or even later?

[Anonymous No.8612392]

>>8612062
>God traditional investors are so, so fucking dumb. It’s comical how fucking dumb they are that they’re not getting in on this literal money printer, instead opting for safe 1 percent returns. Lmfao. The gnashing of teeth of people that study investments for hours and hours that will get ROIcucked by me as I sit in a chair with my hand on my dick. Feels so fucking amazing.
Usually when someone makes a post like this, it's a good sign not to invest. Same reason you wouldn't invest in ChainLink.

[Anonymous No.8612418]

>>8612144
lol stfu Sergey is Satoshi. LINK has its own quadrillion dollar markets to cum all over. A tru Chad holds both assets, like me.

[Anonymous No.8612430]

>>8612392
It kind of IS the perpetuum mobile of investing, at least it does really seem like it at this point in time.
Brace yourself for the future boys it will get even crazier. What a time to be alive.

[Anonymous No.8612440]

REQ with a 0.1% market share would require 910 million worth of tokens to be burned every year. A fair market cap is at least 50x the current valuation.

[Anonymous No.8612455]

>>8612383
Anywhere from 500k to 50mil

[Anonymous No.8612456]

>>8612392
>>8612418
It’s an over the top kind of bait thread where I try and piss people off but the only people replying like REQ and probably only read the title. Either way I like REQ and would be ecstatic if it ever hit ten dollars or something, but that’s a long ways off.

[Anonymous No.8612473]

>>8612392
>implying chainlink won't be worth a lot too
Chainlink is linked with smart contracts which will be a new revolution in the coming years. Not sure if it will be the market leader but if looks like it at some point, better get in that shit too because the memes against no linkers will destroy this board.

[Anonymous No.8612493]

5k REQ here, how much will I be worth this time next year?

[Anonymous No.8612502]

>>8612440
The accounting deal they signed with PwC alone is worth at least $2 billion. The marketcap of REQ is 150 million right now. It should do a x10 based purely on this deal alone.

People are insane for not buying. (not that I'm complaining though, accumulating every month until bullmarket)

[Anonymous No.8612528]

>>8612493
How much do you want it to be worth?

[Anonymous No.8612536]

Can you pay with request? I understand you can, well, request. But can you provide? Allow me to illustrate:

>Hey, Stacey, you still owe me for those tickets to Bryan Adams last month.
>Oh yeah! I'll pay you back right now through this Rek app. Now how do I send... here we go.
>WTF Stacey, you sent me a request for more money? You're such a bitch.
>Ok ok I'm sorry. This geeky app is totes crappers.

[Anonymous No.8612540]

>>8612502

>The accounting deal they signed with PwC alone is worth at least $2 billion.

That's what I figure too. Just in terms of value investing, I can think of no better bet in crypto at this time than REQ.

[Anonymous No.8612568]

>>8612493
In a bear market $10,000 ($2 = 1 REQ)
In a bull market $250,000 to $500,000 ($50 to $100 = 1 REQ)

[Anonymous No.8612570]

>>8612502
but what about LINK? Are you saying I should buy REQ before LINK?

[Anonymous No.8612572]

>>8612536
I wrote the original pastas, you’ve got to choose a specific FUD issue and hammer that home at the end of the pasta.

[Anonymous No.8612591]

No coiner here. How can I buy some without needing to buy a ledger? I've read that not having it saved on a ledger will result in getting your crypto stolen.

[Anonymous No.8612606]

>>8612253
short sighted or realistic. cash money ain’t going nowhere anytime soon. maybe your grandchildren will benefit from you 30,000 REQ

[Anonymous No.8612616]

>>8612062
wow this all sounds weird and creepy.

I think I'll stick to SMSing BCH

[Anonymous No.8612626]

>>8612264
How tf can they just burn your tokens !!??
Hard wallet or exchange anon ?
I saw a post on Reddit and you can actually sue the exchange and get tokens(not all, but hey) back.
Pm me for details bro.

[Anonymous No.8612627]

>>8612062
But why anon? It doesn't seem necessary what advantages will commonfags see in this? They'll just use comfy PayPal and Venmo no? What's suddenly going to change?

[Anonymous No.8612642]

>>8612591
Not stolen per say. The tokens meant for burning are randomly chosen from all REQ holding wallets. And you've got it completely wrong. Having it on a ledger allows you to lock the tokens to prevent them from being burned.

[Anonymous No.8612662]

>>8612642
thanks, just bought 100 nano ledgers

[Anonymous No.8612671]

>>8612062
>being so dumb that you think real businesses want to use your shitcoin for something useful
lol nice work shill

[Anonymous No.8612679]

>>8612627
So you're talking about only the payment request use case. Fees, compared to PayPal and other payment processors, will be orders of magnitude less than current options. This means payees (amazon, online stores, all those good stuff) are charged less for fees and can offer their products for cheaper. Or keep the price the same and have higher margin. This is one use case ONLY of Request

[Anonymous No.8612687]

All in REQ atm. I think the question to be asked about the LINK+REQ combo is not which one will moon (if either), but which one will moon first. I’ve got my money on REQ and then splitting profits into LINK around end of Q2. Expecting a mini-dump on REQ mainnet announcement followed by a long, sustained pump as soon as grandad BTC stabilises. The market cap should be atleast 4x with the partnerships and progress secured by this team.

I can’t fucking wait.

[Anonymous No.8612717]

>>8612502
>the pwc deal is worth 2 billion $
Ive heard that mentioned here but never seen any source on that
Care to provide?
As far is i know there are no details public yet and i expect them to elaborate in fridays update

[Anonymous No.8612736]

>>8612687
but LINK mainnet will probably release Q2 no?

[Anonymous No.8612754]

>>8612679
It can use crypto for payment which is a biggy. If companies want to support the crypto meme they will use Request Network and redditfags will want to push for it as a payment option so they can buy with their Nano and shit.

[Anonymous No.8612782]

Why is the volume for this token so low in comparison with other cryptocurrencies? Is it because no one is selling? I would appreciate it if someone could answer this question.

[Anonymous No.8612789]

>>8612687
Normies don't even know what a smart contract is. LINK is a long term hold like .20c BTC.

[Anonymous No.8612820]

>>8612717
That's because it's complete horseshit. For $2 billion they would be buying the parent company, and that's not at all what PWC do. I bet they have a desk at their blockchain incubator and are paying PWC for the privilege.

[Anonymous No.8612844]

>>8612782
I think a lot of people are waiting for the possible dumb after mainnet announcement

[Anonymous No.8612853]

>>8612627
i used paypal on ebay. i had to pay 25$ fee for some reason and after i paid i owed 3$ to ebay for some fucking reason. so yes i will definately rather use REQ.

[Anonymous No.8612862]

>>8612782
I think no ones selling. I was trying to get a decent price literally all day yesterday, it was fucking impossible. Ended up buying in at 50,000 gwei and then got JUSTed right after.

[Anonymous No.8612895]

>>8612062
10k here bought at 10c

Hope it pans out

[Anonymous No.8612908]

>>8612862
> Buying something when it's on a 60% ramp in price

Brainlet move.

[Anonymous No.8612923]

WHEN THE FUCK IS MAIN NET!?
Q1 IS OVER IN LIKE 3 FUCKING DAYS

[Anonymous No.8612926]

>>8612264
FUCK I thought that token burn was just a meme but I checked my wallet and it's down from 10k to 8k WTF?!

[Anonymous No.8612931]

>>8612923
It's literally out lol

[Anonymous No.8612961]

>>8612908
>buying Antshares when it's up 60% to 0.23 instead of at 0.10

[Anonymous No.8612975]

>>8612789
hold link until 2022? i think itll be evident whether this shit is going to work or not way sooner tho no?

[Anonymous No.8612994]

>>8612931
where? I only heard a bug bounty

[Anonymous No.8613017]

>>8612961
IT's still a 50+% difference when you sell it you fucin brainlet.

[Anonymous No.8613019]

>>8612975
It will, but it will still move up slowly because
>"lol stace whats a chain link?"
>"idk britney, isn't it that weird thing anon had on his phone in lecture?"
>"lol hes such a loser, but srsly what is it"
>"my beta orbiter knows maybe he will help us with it britney"

[Anonymous No.8613053]

>>8612627
Venmo is US only Request Network is global.

Paypal charges a 2-7% fee. Request Network charges a 0.05% fee and supports every fiat and crypto type.

[Anonymous No.8613061]

>>8613053
wil Request support archaic forms of British currency?

[Anonymous No.8613089]

>>8612568
I think it is more important if they deliver.

[Anonymous No.8613125]

>>8612570
LINK is only for oracles. Which will be a very small part of Request Network. Most of the business Request Network will perform is as an accounting/auditing/invoicing platform for 3rd parties to develop Dapps upon.

The "REQ needs LINK to work" spam is not true. And even if it was LINK would only be used for a small % of REQ's Business (less than 5%)

[Anonymous No.8613147]

>>8613061
As long as a third party writes an oracle for it it will even support North Korean Won.

[Anonymous No.8613158]

>>8613147
>REQ SUPPORTS NORTH KOREA!
>BOYCOTT IT NOW
you know if someone puts 2 and 2 together that'll be an article

[Anonymous No.8613160]

>>8613053
>Paypal charges a 2-7% fee. Request Network charges a 0.05% fee and supports every fiat and crypto type.
This is what blows me away if they succeed. During the dot com was there a bunch of companies like this promising the world? Is my mind clouded with my own bias? Of course if they succeed it will 70-100 Billion+ mcap CONSERVATIVE bc of all the use cases.

[Anonymous No.8613192]

>>8613158
Writing it now

[Anonymous No.8613200]

>>8613125
You are fucking deluded. How the fuck you expect invoicing and any of these stuff to work since it is real world data? Oracles are going to be so fucking important not only for REQ but for anything using Smart Contracts that actually want to do something else rather than creating shitcoins.

[Anonymous No.8613210]

>>8613160
I'm sure there were companies promising you'd be able to do all your shopping online and get it delivered to your doorstep and all it takes would be a website. Probably seemed ridiculous at the time.

[Anonymous No.8613245]

>>8613160
Req ico
>Le pay w/req buttox
Instant $100MM
Req+pwc=love
Pwc cucks req
>Sorry guys brb

[Anonymous No.8613250]

>>8613200
It's called triple-entry accounting and doesn't require smart contracts at all.

Read a book sometime. (nah just kidding I also didn't know about this until some auditor anon educated me a couple threads ago, read up about it)

[Anonymous No.8613265]

>>8613192
>>8613158
american leftist media would be all for it. >>8613210
yeah this is what im afraid of...a lot of those vanished into thin air im sure

[Anonymous No.8613272]

Dont put req on a ledger unless you want it catching fire in your pocket

[Anonymous No.8613274]

>>8613210
>>8613265
difference between dotcoms and REQ is we can see what they're doing on GitHub
nobody could check shady dotcoms back in the late 90s

[Anonymous No.8613282]

>>8613250
Lol this is why I come here for info.

[Anonymous No.8613325]

>>8613250
so youre saying I should first invest in REQ then use the profits to buy LINK?

[Anonymous No.8613327]

>>8613265
There was also one called amazon.com

This is how I feel about LINK more than REQ. The idea for smart contracts is good, they will revolutionize the world. Whether or not LINK itself will actually be used or some other thing will do it is the problem. It's a "watch this space" thing, if LINK looks like it will be the market leader, FOMO in. Otherwise accumulate REQ or something else, we are in a bear market anyway.

[Anonymous No.8613386]

>>8613327
The difference is that REQ actually already has the partnerships and market to directly target and get adoption while disrupting the financial services (accounting/auditing/invoicing). ChainLINK will have to establish an entirely new market without a guarantee that they will become a market leader.

Request Network is build from the ground up to deter competition due to being a non-profit with as low of a fee as possible.

LINK could be competed by a competitor as LINK was never created with the intent of claiming market dominance. For all we know LINK is myspace and eventually Facebook pops up.

While Request Network is like Microsoft that competes away competitors and will use their market dominance to keep a monopoly (which is actually legal since Request Network is a non-profit and thus not subject to anti-trust laws)

[Anonymous No.8613397]

>>8613274
This is true didn't think about it like that which makes this kinda incomparable in a sense.
>>8613327
Yeah I know some of my investments like LINK and REQ may fail that's why I'm hesitant to go all in though even when I think they're solid af because by that slight chance shit hits the fan I'll need enough to fomo in.

[Anonymous No.8613414]

>they don't think it be like it is, but it do

I swear to god I'm gonna be a millionaire in 2019

[Anonymous No.8613428]

>>8613414
>CHADFOLIO

[Anonymous No.8613439]

>>8613386
>hoping a nonprofit makes me super rich
Oh the irony is great

[Anonymous No.8613475]

>>8613439
You know what is a non-profit and also a monopoly? IKEA.

Nonprofits are perfect for megacorporations because they are excempt from a ton of laws but you can't have shareholders which is why not a lot of companies are following that method. But with cryptoassets such as REQ it's possible to hold the coin as 100% of the profit Request Network makes will be used to burn REQ tokens. Effectively transfering all profit to the token holders.

[Anonymous No.8613569]

>>8613386
Yeah I completely agree. I was even going to use the example of investing in a shopping website and then having Amazon take off a year later. I won't be buying LINK until it looks like the go-to for smart contract oracles. REQ I think is just undervalued in general, even if it doesn't actually become the next Paypal, it's worth much more than other crypto tokens due to the burn.

[Anonymous No.8613698]

>>8613475
you make an interesting case i must say. I hope you are correct. id like to look into the advantages of nonprofits it seems counter-intuitive on the surface but per the example you have given show they can be highly profitable and successful

[Anonymous No.8613724]

>>8612536
if you don't trust someone just make a smart contract IYKWIM ;)

[Anonymous No.8613739]

>>8613698
All successful blockchain companies have to be non-profit. It is centralised otherwise. The token model is a completely new business model. Vechain foundation is a non profit for example.

[Anonymous No.8613761]

>>8613739
>>8613698
Let me explain a bit more as to why they must be non profit
The code is open source, you can just take it and use it. It has to be open source for developers to be able to make dApps. There is no way for these companies to monetise other than the token model

[Anonymous No.8613800]

Request stops this

[Anonymous No.8613968]

>>8613800

just bought everything

[Anonymous No.8613969]

Question: if the REQ token price gets really high, wouldn't that be prohibitive for continued adoption? Why would companies grab REQ tokens they need if they become so costly? Or can they just buy increments at that point for the amount of fiat they have.

[Anonymous No.8614022]

>>8613969
The fee will be calculated in USD and then converted to its equivalent in REQ.

So if the fee is $1 and that means it's 10 REQ then 10 REQ will get burned. If the $1 fee is 0.000001 REQ then 0.000001 REQ will get burned.

The company will NEVER buy REQ. The Request Network will handle everything on its back-end automatically. People and companies will not even know they are using a cryprocurrency service.

[Anonymous No.8614080]

You guys first need LINKs to do all of this magnificent glory. Go buy LINKS. Haaaa haaaaa

[Anonymous No.8614433]

>>8614080
>haaa haaa
okay time to leave this thread. it's been fun lurking since this faggot stepped in

[Anonymous No.8614560]

>>8614022
Huh. Thanks desu. So basically as long as REQ gets wide adoption, and its versatility makes that seem likely, we crypto NEETs win?

[Anonymous No.8614640]

>>8614560
Most crypto isn't "adopted" anyway. It's all speculation. It doesn't actually need widespread adoption, see BTC which is mostly useless but still 10k. if we hit another bull market it could just moon on speculation like NEO did. Not that I don't see it being adopted but the crypto market isn't often about that. The release of a working product alone will cause a lot of FOMO.

[Anonymous No.8614703]

>>8612062
This is the same with Kyber. Every time a transaction is done KNC is burnt and guess what, Kyber is a partner with REQ so if anyone uses REQ to make a platform from one crypto to another KNC and REQ is burnt.

Kyber is gonna do similiar stuff to REQ but payments between dapps. These two are my moon missions.

[Anonymous No.8614927]

>>8614640
Speculation is great and all desu but it's the actual use of the network and dapps that's necessary for the tokens to burn and cause the scarcity/FOMO, no?

[Anonymous No.8614961]

>>8614927
FOMO happens on all sorts of retarded shit, never underestimate people's stupidity to just throw their life savings in a shitcoin on speculation. See: ICX and Vechain.

[Anonymous No.8614975]

>>8614640
I don't believe in this anymore. That market is over. No new money is coming in and so you are starting to see the market becoming idle. Only real world adoption and crash flow from companies using REQ will move the price up. There will only be FOMO as REQ price consistently rises due to the fees and /biz/ tries to buy it to save themselves from the bear market. But there won't be a huge normie type of fomo into Request Network. Those people are out of the market and will most likely never return again.

Not that this matters though because Request Network has so much real life potential that the money flowing in from the fees consistently will push it up and make it very profitable for early holders in the long run anyway.

[Anonymous No.8614995]

Could Req ever reach over $100? I know a lot of people are saying it won't due to the market cap.

Are we also factoring in the crypto currency billion dollar industry where it's difficult to convert back to fiat?

[Anonymous No.8615048]

>>8613061
>he doesn’t know about tally stick private integration.

[Anonymous No.8615090]

>>8614995
Yes, in fact as long as REQ gets used by a company it's GUARANTEED REQ will reach $100 someday. Why? Because the money REQ makes will be used to burn REQ tokens so eventually the supply will be so low that the remaining REQ tokens will be worth $100 a piece.

If REQ is really adopted widespread it'll be within a couple of years. If REQ is mediocre it will take 10 years. If REQ is a failure it'll take 40 years but it WILL happen as long as it gets adopted (it's already adopted as of 2 days ago)

[Anonymous No.8615129]

>>8614995
Depends how many tokens are burnt, it's tough for a coin with a 600 million supply to hit one hundred dollars. Obviously there's token burn but I don't know how many tokens that will actually burn. Just depends how much the crypto market as a whole grows IMO, I think if the crypto market as a whole grows it's going to be from normal people coming in and I think they'd use a platform that allowed them to easily pay for consumer goods like REQ potentially could.

[Anonymous No.8615217]

>>8614975
Yes, spread the hopelessness, sell off all of your crypto.

[Anonymous No.8615286]

>>8612144

No need to bully, anon. REQ, LINK, and QSP are the holy trinity of /biz/.

[Anonymous No.8615288]

>>8615217
I think the real money in crypto now is within getting real life cashflows from profitable business strategies. Not from the usual speculation that ended in December 2017.

I feel like most oldfags agree with me as the interest in crypto on google analythics and other trend showers indicate that interest is waning ever since december 2017 for the first time since 2009.

We won't have a speculative market anymore it'll slowly evolve towards a performance based market like the stock market.

[Anonymous No.8615290]

>>8615090
>>8615129

What if a company like Amazon partners up with Req? What could it reach?

[Anonymous No.8615310]

>>8615286
JNT has replaced QSP my dude

[Anonymous No.8615328]

>>8615290
I don't think a lot of people will buy REQ. But REQ will grow due to making more profit due to being used by people on amazon and thus burning more tokens.

We are not in a speculation market anymore. Partnerships and all those things don't impact the price anymore. The only thing that will impact price is actual real life profit being made by cryptocompanies.

[Anonymous No.8615333]

>>8612253
It will be tokenized FIAT before that.

[Anonymous No.8615341]

>>8612062
REQ the original nu-male coin

[Anonymous No.8615346]

>>8615288
I think smart contracts are the future and Weill be the next boom. Agred tho that the next wave will be because of the implementation.

[Anonymous No.8615352]

>>8612502

You did read the announcement right? It's a great STEP in the right direction, but for now it's contained to France/Africa as the testing grounds, which like I said is a great first step, but it's not a full-blown integration of PwC and their accounting business worldwide.

[Anonymous No.8615358]

>>8615328

I understand that. I was talking about the sheer volume of transactions Amazon makes. A lot of tokens would be burnt.

[Anonymous No.8615375]

>>8612062

>Bitcoin is stabalizing

[Anonymous No.8615388]

>>8612687

Agreed. REQ will move first. I moved my LINK into REQ last week.

[Anonymous No.8615390]

>>8615346
Smart contracts were already the boom with Ethereum. I think you mean smart oracles from LINK? Or do you mean smart contract will be even more mainstream than now?

>>8615358
2 things can happen. Either a lot of tokens will get burned so the total supply drops very fast. Or the price per token will rise a lot and thus the token burn will slow down. Most likely a bit of both will happen but that's never sure.

Anyway in the short term it's best for your own profitability to keep the price of REQ as low as possible so that as much as possible REQ tokens get burned so that you hold a higher % of outstanding tokens that will rise in price in the future. I suspect this will cause a lot of fudding of REQ in the future because both accumulators/haters and actual holders have their best interest in REQ tokens being as cheap as possible.

[Anonymous No.8615413]

>>8612975

It will be evident that it works long before 2022, but enterprise adoption and regulation standards on smart contracts will take time.

[Anonymous No.8615432]

>>8613245
This wasn’t even a sentence

[Anonymous No.8615443]

>>8615390

I'm trying my best to accumulate as much as I can. I have 15k so far :(

[Anonymous No.8615469]

>>8613250
>>8613125


The problem with idiots like you is that you're just searching for ways REQ can be viable without LINK.

Why do this?

REQ has shown every single hint possible their using LINK. Who gives a shit about theoretical ways REQ can work without LINK? When REQ IS CLEARLY GOING TO USE LINK.

Are you just anti-chainlink because it's shilled so much? If so that's fucking stupid. It's shilled so much because LINK HOLDERS REALIZE ALL THESE SMART CONTRACT ICOs PLAN ON USING LINK's ORACLES. MAKING LINK THE MOST VAULBLE INVESTMENT.

But I give up telling you people. Y'all are fucking ignorant.

[Anonymous No.8615483]

>>8615469
Why would I want link? Link is a joke.

[Anonymous No.8615485]

>>8614975

You forget one important trait of the normie: short attention span.

New money will return. It just may take longer than we hope.

[Anonymous No.8615492]

>>8615469
LINK isn't the only oracle contract that exists.

[Anonymous No.8615514]

>>8615390
Yeah oracles. I just think smart contracts have a lot more potential or disrupt a lot of markets that it really hasn't quite yet. This is why I believe smart contract platform will eventually have the highest market cap because of the potential to dip into the most lucrative markets in the world.

[Anonymous No.8615527]

>>8615390

I think anon was referring to how smart contracts are basically only used in ICOs now, while we're waiting for actual enterprise adoption of them, and therefore a need for an oracle service.

[Anonymous No.8615528]

If normies pay 4k for a SUPREME ™ hoodie, would they pay $1k for a REQ?

[Anonymous No.8615529]

>>8615485
We need to show signs that the bubble has fully popped. That will probably be several months as it doesn't look as though Bitcoin is done dumping. People need to see a few months of sideways movement to feel like they're getting a decent price.

[Anonymous No.8615542]

>>8615492

Guess which one REQ has been hunting since November.

Guess which one REQ says their in talks with.

Guess which one REQ has been testing.

Guess which one is releasing mainnet around the same time REQ plans to release fiat.

It's like you people are retarded.

[Anonymous No.8615565]

>>8615528
Maybe if it ever became a status symbol. But I doubt it since I don't see normies flaunting their stock options.

Doesn't really matter if normies buy it or not though honestly I feel like by the time the new bull market starts in 2-3 years REQ will already be an established player and will barely feel a dent in price even if the collective normie space FOMOs in. The real money is in the cashflows of the businesses that will adopt REQ.

[Anonymous No.8615573]

>>8615432
He's saying what if Pwc is just latching to REQ to incubate their own blockchain or something, and the REQ team just absconds with the dough they made in ICO after handing Pwc the keys to the car

[Anonymous No.8615599]

>>8615483
https://etherscan.io/address/0xdd76b55ee6dafe0c7c978bff69206d476a5b9ce7#tokentxns

Better ditch REQ then dickhead

[Anonymous No.8615602]

>>8615529

Agreed. New catalysts will be sideways movement for a while showing some level of stability, real use of some coins, and big investor money coming in.

[Anonymous No.8615639]

>>8615542

>tfw majority link and req portfolio

[Anonymous No.8615644]

>>8615542
Ducatur

[Anonymous No.8615656]

>>8615639
>Tfw the same situation
>Tfw I have become the meme

[Anonymous No.8615663]

>>8612062

thanks ranjesh just bought 800k

[Anonymous No.8615708]

>>8615599
80k Jesuscoin, what did they mean with that?

[Anonymous No.8615717]

>>8615663
Has a pajeet ever written a full post of text or used a sentence with a comma?

[Anonymous No.8615942]

>>8615717
Yeah you did

[Anonymous No.8616058]

>>8615656
Basically bought in due to all the shilling. I've read both white papers though and both I feel could be cash cows. However I'm 70/20/7 in NEO/LINK/REQ respectively. Should I dump more NEO? I want to keep it as my majority and the amount I've already transferred into REQ and LINK will make me a millionaire if they get into the 20-40 dollar range

[Anonymous No.8616259]

>>8613272
I thought the ledger was supposed to prevent burning?

[Anonymous No.8616303]

>>8615599
Kill yourself

[Anonymous No.8616601]

93 Ether sell wall put up at 47,000 Buterins on Binance, wow! This piece of shit is going to zero!

[Anonymous No.8616650]

are 25,000 REQ enough?
I'm dilluted as fuck in 20 different coins AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH

[Anonymous No.8616902]

If partnerships, apps, and all their roadmap goes well, Req will be $100 EoY.

[Anonymous No.8616936]

>>8616902
Delusional

[Anonymous No.8616962]

>>8616902
Kill yourself.

[Anonymous No.8616997]

REQ
LINK
ENG
NAS
QASH
JNT

The future of crypto portfolio right here. Dropped all my X gen blockchain coins for this shit.

[Anonymous No.8617087]

>>8616997

What's the downlow on JNT?

[Anonymous No.8617127]

>>8617087
Will be used to tokenize assets, already have plans to tokenize well above their market cap in assets so mathematically it should be guaranteed to go up. They are also reaching out to the ME and a lot of ME leaders are looking to invest in futuristic technologies like smart cities, JNT might catch lightning if they meet the right people.

[Anonymous No.8617147]

>>8616997

>falling for each and every shill on this indian metalworking forum

[Anonymous No.8617202]

>>8617127

Ahhh, it's that one. Yes, it's a great idea! Thanks for the reminder, anon.

[Anonymous No.8617213]

>>8617147
I don't even care if I got memed on, these projects look much better than any others I have found. I'll dump like lead if see any of the partnerships turn out to be fake like some VEN shit but otherwise, I will slowly accumulate all 6.

[Anonymous No.8617233]

>>8616962
>>8616936
Explain how I'm delusional ....otherwise go fuck yourself for not even having an argument.

Token burning plus tons of transactions every minute, adoption by the general public and companies, what's stopping it from doing that?

[Anonymous No.8617328]

>>8612572
huge fan here. only flaw imo was "lay it on me", thats oldster talk

[Anonymous No.8617367]

>>8612926
were any ashes left in there

[Anonymous No.8617435]

>>8616997
This is p much my portfolio minus the Enigma.

>>8617087
It's still a moon mission desu, buy with confidence

[Anonymous No.8617471]

Its dumping so fucking hard right now hahaha

[Anonymous No.8617526]

REQ is literally just a javascript library that interacts with Ethereum, it's really pathetic if you really think about it. You must be a drooling retard to think you're gonna 1000x on this. $2 during a bull market at best.

Nobody is going to use this crap anyways

[Anonymous No.8617677]

Anons, I have a brainlet question: where are the burned tokens coming from? I know all about the trezor token lock-in/burn guard lulz but seriously though.

[Anonymous No.8617696]

>>8617677

[Anonymous No.8618003]

>>8617677

The token is used for the platform to function, and when that happens a portion of those tokens are burned, if not outright.

[Anonymous No.8618038]

>>8618003
...and these don't come out of people's wallets? >_>

[Anonymous No.8618075]

>>8618038
No, they're bought at market price through Kyber Network. If Request has a .5% transaction fee and the REQ token is worth one dollar, a $1000 dollar transaction on the Request Network would have a fee of 5 dollars so 5 REQ would be burnt.

[Anonymous No.8618123]

>>8618075
25 req at current price

[Anonymous No.8618390]

>>8618038

No....

[Anonymous No.8618463]

>>8618123
this will be glorious. Will be picking up a couple thousand req when its under .10 in a month or 2

[Anonymous No.8618626]

>>8618463
Lmao

Realistically I don't know how much volume this platform will see initially. At its current price to move 40 dollars you'd need one token, so to burn 100 million tokens you'd need 4 billion dollars to move through the network. However, as money moves the network automatically buys up tokens, and if it's buying up large amounts of tokens the price will go up just as if it was a human buying up large amounts of tokens.

If we assume the price held constant at 20 cents (obviously it won't if people are using the network) you'd need to move 40 billion dollars through the network to burn 100 million tokens. For reference, Binance did about 1.4 billion USD in volume today, so 30 days or so on Binance would move that much USD. However, if someone bought up 100 million REQ over the portion of 40 days the price would go through the roof. How much? I don't know. Request would need to see some serious adoption to get as much USD volume that Binance currently gets. A REQ based exchange would be great and would move a lot of money if it was well designed, but a fiat to fiat dApp built on REQ that actually worked and allowed large sums of money to be sent cheaper and at least as fast as Paypal would do a lot of volume I think.

This is all speculation of course, but we are in a speculative market.

[Anonymous No.8618767]

>>8618626
Like I said $100 EoY

Great points though

[Anonymous No.8619021]

Im not sure where to post this but out of curiosity, does anyone know what determines the number of zeros required for the generation of a SHA proof of work? I dont think this is even allowed to be posted on /g/.

[Anonymous No.8619091]

Just bought 10k. No joke.
What's the sell target? 29k sats?

[Anonymous No.8619100]

Scamming pajeet OP. I'm not buying your bags.

[Anonymous No.8619167]

>>8619091
Next sell target - 0.30 - 0.35 , then we see .18 .... then sell between 0.25 - 0.30

[Anonymous No.8619250]

>>8612062
Damn well worded argument but first post wrecks you and me (I hold a lot of REQ) >>8612087

Sorry OP, try again in a week

[Anonymous No.8619330]

>>8612853
Have used paypal on ebay for fucking ever and never had additional fees or charges you fucken shill.

[Anonymous No.8620075]

REQ $100 EOY

[Anonymous No.8620597]

>>8612642
kek'd

[Anonymous No.8620620]

REQ 0.005 EOY

[Anonymous No.8620798]

>>8620075
>>8620620
>>8620597
Like you were all told in the prophecy.
$100 EoY

[Anonymous No.8620807]

Should I sell my LTC bags at loss for REQ?

[Anonymous No.8620834]

>>8620798
only prophecy I was ever told was LINK $1000 EOY and that sounds bonkers

[Anonymous No.8620904]

>>8620807
No one cares

[Anonymous No.8620940]

>>8620904
Asking for advice anon

[Anonymous No.8620949]

>>8620940
Upvote

[Anonymous No.8620970]

>>8615310
Nope

[Anonymous No.8621215]

>>8612062
>DO YOU FUCKING HEAR ME?

[Anonymous No.8621484]

Main net pull request on github. This it is lads. The team delivered main net q1 as promised. Comfy as fuck from 5c.

[Anonymous No.8621609]

>>8621484
Baka

[Anonymous No.8621619]

Daily reminder that the REQ team outsourced the development to actual pajeets

[Anonymous No.8621725]

>>8619250
Fggt

[Anonymous No.8621867]

Faggot they need to pass know your customervand team id clueless

[Anonymous No.8621928]

>>8621619
Weak FUD, try harder.

[Anonymous No.8622273]

>>8613272
That's why you lock it

[Anonymous No.8622287]

I didn't renew my BurnGuard protection... What is the % of chance that my REQ got burned ?

[Anonymous No.8622362]

>>8622287
100%. just a matter of when not if

[Anonymous No.8622477]

>>8613569
But LINK does look like the go-to for smart contract oracles