/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

>>9714649

>friend weeb I knew in one of my high school art classes out of curiosity on Facebook
>mfw I find out he's majoring in japanese art at a community college and posting shitty fate softcore porn on Facebook
>mfw I find out he's friends with his parents and family
>mfw

>>9615648
the thread was already shit up by existing

>>9609021

>>9587624

>>9226136
nice self post. looks like shit.

>>9160072
>using hot topic fishnets for armsocks

>>9112507
fucking kek

>>9020974
>naruto
>queer socialism
>creepy looking larders
the unholy trinity

>>8957203
Ugly people aren't allowed to be entitled anon. If you amount to shit, expect it in return.

>be me
>be married
>in SDCC
>tell waifu to get a sexy cosplay
>she chooses mai shiranui
>tell her it's ok for her to get fucked by other guys there
>she goes and fucks some guy in the bathroom
>i say its ok do it as many times she wants
>she keeps getting fucked like crazy
>leaks cum all over the floor as she walks
>take her home quickly and finish the job

>>8008371
Then why bother posting it online if there's a chance she could get in actual legal trouble? This means that if photographs of a couple girls in outfits somehow became popular enough that the Chinese government would see it, find out the cosplayers' personal information, somehow find and trace their inspiration back to the fan artist just so they could go through the trouble of putting her in prison. If she's really that worried, why didn't she release the art under a pseudonym? Sorry if I seem like a dick about it, but that's just really questionable and just a little too farfetched to believe. Because why not go the extra mile and blame Naoko Takeuchi for "corrupting" the fan artist by creating characters that technically get naked every episode?

>>8008494
>As such, since you can't purchase the product (like the shoes examples), it's good manners to ask the artists permission before otherwise representing their work.

Sure, I can see this being a weird grey area since I honestly have no idea how the fashion industry works. But there are plenty of resolutions to these problems without having to throw an immature tantrum like the scenarios I've been reading. If these people aren't mass producing and selling something based on your original design, and you haven't actually copyrighted the design within 3 months of publicizing it, then that risk of someone recreating it for private use solely falls on you.

>I find the majority of people who are dismissive of intellectual property rights have never had their intellectual property stolen.

I completely understand how bullshit it is to be a small time artist getting your work stolen by someone cropping out the url/watermark and getting all the recognition and praise for it. But in regards to recreating a physical "replica" from an artwork based on someone else's artwork, I see that as a little different, and something that could be resolved easily as long as both parties are logical about it.