[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

>> No.10680251 [View]

>>10680231
People using it as a broad insult to unfeminine cis women are not radfem TERFs. They're just shitheads. Lots of radfems are butch specifically because they promote being GNC without being a troon

>> No.10680258 [View]

>>10680251
I get what you're saying but tons of radfem TERFs are the types to at first glance assume a masculine bodied but otherwise feminine presenting or even deep voiced woman is trans not as an insult but because they are trying to sniff or root out any "TIMs" and get rid of them and they just end up harming cis women too. I personally dgaf about trans people and hold them to the same standard of behavior as anyone else though. Don't be cringe, creepy, or concerning in any way and you're good.

>> No.10680260 [View]

I just want to read about AP updates. Take the radfem/ana bullshit to the farm, for fucks sake.

>> No.10680263 [View]

>>10680260
No

>> No.10680351 [View]

>>10679848
Ok noob

>> No.10680365 [View]

>>10680260
Maybe if AP actually knew what days they wanted to update, we could talk about it.
Also this is why I liked prophet-chan, she'd drop hints of the new release early so there was less of a lull in things to discuss.

>> No.10680768 [View]
File: 301 KB, 876x400, 1002_slide.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10680768

New releases are up, feels pointless to dump so close to autosage, not a very exciting week anyway

>> No.10680769 [View]

>>10680768
It all sucks anyways

>> No.10680771 [View]

>>10680769
I was excited until I saw tweed polyester. I don't mind chiffon or even viyella but tweed shouldn't be plastic.

>> No.10680813 [View]

>>10680768
I feel like I have shit taste, but I really like this release and think it's super cute

>> No.10680913 [View]

>>10680771
You're right. Fuck the oil industry for getting their dirty hands into everything.

>> No.10680973 [View]

>only 5 posts in thread about this week's new release
AP has hit a new low.

>> No.10681022 [View]

>>10680768
Dress is cute but hate the ears

>> No.10681048 [View]

>>10680768
I'm so conflicted. I told myself I'd maybe buy this one and that damned ribbon dress and honestly...

I'd rather go buy an older release. These just really aren't hitting it for me.

>> No.10681074 [View]

Has anyone NOT gotten their Sugary Carnival from AP USA ye? I checked the website and my order doesn't seem to have been shipped out yet.

>> No.10681103 [View]

>>10681022
i love the ears and hate the dress lol

>> No.10681105 [View]

>>10681074
I haven't gotten mine either. I've only gotten my OTKs from Paris. AP USA is probably just taking their time.

>> No.10681106 [View]

>>10681074
I haven't even received the shipping email yet.

>> No.10681163 [View]

>>10681074
I wonder what the odds of AP USA listing extras is after they finish shipping out the MTO orders. My MTO from Japan might be lost, and I'd buy back-ups in a heartbeat.

>> No.10681306 [View]

>>10681074
I'm also waiting. I'm so jealous of the girls who got their dresses already.

>> No.10681352 [View]

>>10681074
I haven't received mine yet

>> No.10681536 [View]

I really wish AP would re release the half-aprons again. wishing for a mint colorway

>> No.10682185 [View]

>>10681536
I want a cotton half-apron. The tulle ones are cute, but not for me.

>> No.10682186 [View]

>>10682185
I meant organdy, don't come for me.

>> No.10682779 [View]

Never seen the AP general so far down. Predictions for this week’s release?

>> No.10682795 [View]

>>10682779
Something very boring that won't sell out

>> No.10682796 [View]

>>10682779
iirc we have the leopard print left in the lookbook and 2 nonprints. my guess is we'll get a nonprint this week, leopard next week, last nonprint & maybe the next lookbook week after next.

>> No.10682798 [View]

>>10682796
I expect them to release the outerwear collection before the new lookbook.

>> No.10682809 [View]

I'm so excited for SC. Everytime I get a new email my heart skips a beat cause I think it might be the AP USA shipping email. I think by the time I get the actual email I'll just get a heart attack and die instantly.

>> No.10682962 [View]

>>10682809
>imagining the skip your heart will take if they cancel your order
kek

>> No.10682969 [View]

Have anyone else experienced more problems than usual with AP regarding orders and quality control? I still haven't received my Fall Lookbook and my MTO had a blue ink stain on it...

>>10682779
I doubt anything interesting. Luckily our wallets can take a break desu

>> No.10682980 [View]

>>10682969
I bought some sale items and the socks I got also had a blue ink stain. Pics? Where did you buy yours from?

>> No.10683195 [View]

>>10682962
Don't say that anon I'll disintegrate on the spot

>> No.10683314 [View]

>>10682809
I hope you get it! I just got the original SC and it’s so fucking cute in person. The mto is gonna look amazing and you’ll be so happy. No wonder it was so iconic it’s absolutely sending me

>> No.10683322 [View]

>>10682969
Was it the Sugary Carnival MTO? Can you post a picture of it?

Recent quality control issues I've had with AP:
>black/blue mark on Candy Border OTKs
>snagged/torn satin bow on the recent Lyrical Face pochette
>uneven mouth embroidery on the goodnight bunny bag
>random defective heart button with bubbles in it
>in general the OTKs are getting less stretchy and more stiff

>> No.10683324 [View]

>>10682969
The cotton used for the MTO is terrible. It has small lumps that can't be removed because it'll ruin the print.

>> No.10683373 [View]

>>10683324
The sugary carnival MTO? I got mine and it was pretty well made.

>> No.10683378 [View]

>>10683324
Maybe I'm stupid, but what do you mean by small lumps? Is the fabric bumpy? Are there "knots" in the weave? Kinda makes me nervous cause I dropped a lot of money on the MTO just to have non-faded dresses.

>> No.10683414 [View]

>>10683373
What do you think, genius?

>>10683378
Yes, whatever factory made the fabric did it as cheap as possible.

>> No.10683419 [View]

>>10683414
That's messed up. Now I'm really nervous to get mine. I hadn't heard anyone say the fabric was crap until now.

>> No.10683485 [View]

>>10683322
Didnt someone also get a HC bow recently that had the chocolate bottle showing on the side?

>> No.10683872 [View]

>>10683414
>what do you think genius
Bitch there were a few MTOs, too bad yours had weird balls kek. Mine was fine though.
Sucks to be you.

>> No.10683897 [View]
File: 286 KB, 876x400, 1009_slide.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10683897

New release page isn't up yet, but the top image has been uploaded: http://www.angelicpretty.com/newarrival/newarrival/2021/1009/1009_slide.jpg

Looks like we're getting Waffle Heart

>> No.10683910 [View]

>>10683897
Damn, what's with all the pouches and notebooks? Who is asking for these kek

>> No.10683915 [View]
File: 118 KB, 600x720, 10_1633246203.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10683915

Please jesus, no one buy these shit bags. I don't know why AP is re-releasing them. The quality is terrible and they weren't that popular the first time around.

>> No.10683934 [View]

>>10683897
sameanon, but following up now that the release page is available: http://www.angelicpretty.com/newarrival/newarrival/index_20211009.htm

Looks like there's a change where they now post the individual product pages early ("詳細はこちら" links)

Good change on their part, although I will miss the mild advantage I might have had of guessing the url early and refreshing until it went live.

>> No.10683938 [View]

>>10683915
Jesus $150 for this dollar store trash.

Also those berets look cute in the pics but I have to imagine they didn’t show them on a model because they’ll look wonky af.

>> No.10683947 [View]

>>10683938
I still regret wasting money on mine and I'm just waiting for a swap meet to try and get rid of it.
All new AP plush is cursed.

>> No.10684127 [View]

I bought the Happy Garland notebook and pouch to cope with the fact I prioritized other releases at the time the print was released kek. But this week sure was a sleeper as well.

>> No.10686981 [View]

New thread (that new thread creator failed to link to): >>10684189