[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 278 KB, 1564x1564, FB_IMG_1542769826716.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10040044 No.10040044 [Reply] [Original]

Previous Thread: >>10034562

>> No.10040045
File: 64 KB, 720x960, FB_IMG_1542770095255.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10040045

>>10040044

>> No.10040069

>>10040044
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LVV1VUs7Z8

Idk if anyone posted this, but enjoy the cringe

>> No.10040072

>>10040069
Not even an actual lolita. Besides her piercings and makeup are the only fugly thing. If she took them of and toned it down it would be fine. That goth is a walking Killstar advertisement though,yeesh

>> No.10040073

>>10040072
That's literally what she called herself. She said she felt like she was the only "lolita" in the world.

>> No.10040075
File: 705 KB, 3072x3192, FDDBB9A7-AAEC-43F5-9EF9-61E38E73D393.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10040075

That poor cardigan

>> No.10040078

>>10040075
Armhair...

>> No.10040080

>>10040078
The arm hair doesn’t bother me, it’s the fact that she’s a planet that can’t fit into that dress or cardigan.

>> No.10040081

>>10040069
it was posted in the last thread
tl;dr of that discussion is she was portrayed in a bad light by the people who made the video, she does actually wear lolita but didn't for this interview, and yes, her piercings are bad

>> No.10040096 [DELETED] 

>>10039965
>>10039977
Browsing her instagram was a mistake but at least she is self aware,(pic from insta related.)

>> No.10040097

>>10040075
Holy fucking arms. Also, her head looks giant.

>> No.10040102
File: 633 KB, 599x597, aha.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10040102

>>10039965
>>10039977
Browsing her instagram was a mistake but at least she is self aware,(pic from insta related.)

>> No.10040103

>>10040096
Also, for the last anon that was asking what schizoaffective is, it's a disorder that's like a combination of schizophrenia and a mood disorder like depression or bipolar. Try using google every now and again when you don't know what something is.

>> No.10040104

>>10040075
aw, her head and her bag are the same shape

>> No.10040109

>>10040103
>Try using google every now and again when you don't know what something is.
Or we just wait until you tell us.

>> No.10040111

>>10040109
Does mommy need to spoon feed you your dinner, too?

>> No.10040135

>>10040075
She looks like one of those reaction meme faces from several years ago. Weird face shoop isn't helping, poor girl

>> No.10040136

>>10040075
This would be cute if she wasn’t a planet

>> No.10040148 [DELETED] 
File: 160 KB, 749x899, 551506DF-B389-4814-B1E3-F71AE7D37209.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10040148

>>10039965
>Cweepy

>> No.10040161

>>10040148
ageplayer or just owo meme?

>> No.10040162

>>10040111
Yes,please.

>> No.10040169

>>10040075
Is this a guy? Cause I have no idea how anyone is reading this as female.

>> No.10040171

>>10040169
desu it looks like they have a bad hormone imbalance.

>> No.10040173
File: 47 KB, 536x960, tumblr_pgabqeX1Gu1rpdguqo4_640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10040173

>> No.10040174
File: 94 KB, 500x500, tumblr_peigxc4p8S1ratb4so1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10040174

>>10040044

>> No.10040212

>>10040173
>>10040174
scary how you can tell who's a tumblr retard just from looking at them

>> No.10040213
File: 375 KB, 1068x1602, FB_IMG_15427897498071445.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10040213

"Meta head to toe" my ass. I own that dress and this is 100% a replica.

>> No.10040215
File: 201 KB, 900x1200, CqSHDzhUMAA4JV5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10040215

>>10040213
Actual JSK from Meta for reference

>> No.10040229

>>10040213
>>10040215
Wtf the buildings arent even there

>> No.10040231

>>10040213
>>10040229
I’m not a fan of the coord, but it just looks like one of the lucky pack skirts they put out when they have extra fabric. Plus I don’t believe this one was ever made as a replica. I have a few Meta lucky pack skirts and they often have this gold trim on the bottom too. Personally the boots raise my suspicions more. Also can you really call it Meta “head-to-toe” if the socks are offbrand?

>> No.10040272

>>10040231
It sits so wrong, though. It's also short. There was an official skirt that also had the buildings, so unless it's something exclusive to lucky packs, it's probably not Meta.

And yeah, the boots and the socks are not brand, so...head to knees? Head to waist? What a mess.

>> No.10040274

>>10040272

nayrt, but the shape could be due to a dodgy petticoat, and the length could be because she's tall. It does look like the lucky-pack-specific cut, the ones that aren't border prints always seem to have a second tier.

To be honest with you I've no idea what's going on with her shape, she's just kind of bulbous and ballooney under her clothes for some reason.

>> No.10040275
File: 174 KB, 500x584, 00449538-bdea-581c-b209-e56f6176642e.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10040275

>>10040213
>>10040229
>>10040231
>>10040272
https://lolibrary.org/items/meta-fantasy-parade-frill-skirt

>> No.10040276

>>10040231
>>10040229
Lol it's a LP skirt, they always do those with the leftover fabric. There's a cute kimono print one on Mercari right now

>> No.10040307

>>10040174
This is old as fuck, anon

>> No.10040315
File: 602 KB, 1536x2048, A72D26A3-846D-4F4A-B52F-03615B874624.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10040315

>>10040213
She is a minor lolcow as she lies in rc all the time. It isn’t a replica, her only outfit is from the one time she actually bought from Meta. Here is the same outfit from a year ago.

>> No.10040324

>>10040315
That's...sad, honestly.

>> No.10040627

>>10040075
I-I don't understand.... How can somebody's head be so round.... like egg

>> No.10040649

>>10040069
Thats adorable.

>> No.10040652

>>10040075
If not for the arm hair, she would be really cute in a cartoonish way

>> No.10040657

>>10040315
stereotypical ita pose, too.

>> No.10040667

>>10040136
I thouht the same, color scheme and bunny ears are really cute, cuter socks and 160 pounds less and it would be a really adorable Bodyline coord.

>> No.10040674

>>10040075
She's actually a sphere.

>> No.10040675

>>10040075
Her handle is literally fattychan (and fattysama). She’s hella self aware couldn’t care less

>> No.10040682

>>10040315
wtf is wrong with her boobs?

>> No.10040684

>>10040682
looks like she's wearing a binder or somthing to squish them down... she really should have lifted them under the binder though...

>> No.10040723
File: 427 KB, 567x375, ech.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10040723

This girl not only pollutes the lolita tag with her shit but her IG has loli gore/edgelord shit all over.
I keep seeing her on my "explore"

>> No.10040738

>>10040723
oooooooooh shit i saw a vid of her floating around on fb today she's that girl who made a huge fool of herself on her live

>> No.10040743

>>10040738
her account is gross, I don't get why some people have so many followers on Instagram

>> No.10040747

>>10040723
She also has a scat fetish.

>> No.10040749 [DELETED] 

>>10040173
>>10040174
>>10040075
>>10040045
>>10040044
Is this the next fat, radical feminist fashion?

>> No.10040752

>>10040747
Source?

>> No.10040756

>>10040723
>>10040747
Is this poop chan?

>>10040738
Is it the vid you're talking about? Someone in my feed shared it today.
Mistress.Anju/ posts/ 20276 1989 3924 888
(remove all spaces)

>> No.10040758
File: 1.38 MB, 1440x1825, Screenshot_20181122-012757~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10040758

>>10040723

>> No.10040760

>>10040723
Yikes, she's a cheap copy of Toshi Salvino

>> No.10040792 [DELETED] 

>>10040749
Lolita is literally known as fat girls fashion in Lolita are you really this fucking new?

>> No.10040794

>>10040758
That giant disgusting nose ring makes her look like a pig. How fitting.
Also her boyfriend looks trashy as fuck, once again, how fitting.

>> No.10040804

>>10040792
I don't come to this shit hole, you inbred mongrel. Clicked the wrong board and saw it.

>> No.10040805

>>10040075
Omg. Dont eat me please.

>> No.10040809 [DELETED] 

>>10040792
It's know as the fat girl fashion by Japanese standards, not by western standards

>> No.10040813

>>10040758
What's with the gross makeup and piercing trend right now

>> No.10040820

>>10040723
guys this girl literally had a crazy call out post like two days ago because she was saying some racist stuff and was chewed out about it (and instead of being a normal person and fixing it, she made an absolute fool of herself) blocked by multiple artists for art theft and i've tried to trade items with her in the past and she never sent the items (apparent this is a very common thing) also her depop is full of cringe worthy pictures of shitty "lolita" and random "melanie martinez inspired" items on her boyfriend

>> No.10040821

>>10040758
oh yes sorry to same fag but when she got called out instead of reacting like anyone else would, and after she threw a hissy fit for being called out she literally started spamming her friends list and followers with private messages of her boyfriends shitty music project

>> No.10040824

>>10040821
Called out on what? I missed it all.

>> No.10040841

>>10040824
look at the link i posted
(add http facebook dot com in front and remove all spaces)

>> No.10040976

>>10040747
wait so poop chan is the girl from that cringy fb video??

>> No.10040988

>>10040758
Who's going to be retarded enough to give money to dangerhairs?

>> No.10040989

>>10040315
looks like Moot

>> No.10040990

>>10040820
why would you ever consider trading items with someone so nasty? are you nasty too?

>> No.10040993

>>10040809
Nayrt but fat girls are definitely overrepresented in my local lolita comm vs. the general population. My country has less of an obesity problem than many other Western countries yet 30%+ of my comm is obese. I can’t speak for the entire West, but in my area it is kind of a fat girl fashion.

>> No.10041056

>>10040809
Fat? Maybe. It’s more associated with unattractive girls in Japan. Like girls who aren’t cute without super cute clothes.

>> No.10041081

>>10040169
They're all male. We're using female pronouns because cosplay mentality.

>> No.10041084
File: 659 KB, 750x932, 0CD3B02C-CF8E-44D8-84E3-31DD3786827D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10041084

I love that cosplay Lolita is stuck in 2010

>> No.10041108
File: 151 KB, 1490x1476, 094D22D7-226C-4796-B43C-ED9ACA22AEB2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10041108

>> No.10041110
File: 216 KB, 750x750, 4CDF05DA-694B-4C29-8A99-D3DF1CD1D8B5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10041110

>> No.10041112

>>10041110
desu these leg covering are worlds better than the pants they were wearing under their skirts last year

>> No.10041129

>>10041112
...are muslim girls not allowed to wear tights?

>> No.10041130

>>10041112
Are those not pants? They look like pants, and they look like shit. Knee high boots would be infinitely better than whatever this is.

>> No.10041138

>>10041110
Ok but why not
1.tights
2.knee high lolita boots
3. Bloomers that reach down to the knee on top of tights
4.profit

>> No.10041146

>>10041129
They are but i'm assuming they either didn't have them or they genuinely preferred those

>> No.10041147

>>10041108
wasn't this posted in the last thread

>> No.10041167

>>10041129 >>10041138 >>10041146
It depends. I've known girls who get yelled at for even asking about tights; it comes down to the family's perspective of if the tights are too reminiscent of the anatomy of legs. Like, it's it's simplest form it's about covering skin, but on a secondary level it's about obscuring anatomy to hide the natural lines of the body. See, the white paints work because they are loose enough to hide wither or not the legs they cover have any kind of feminine shape. Overall I think this picture shows the girls are getting a better grasp on how to merge their interests and religion.

>>10041084
Terrible Wig time out corner for you.

>>10041108
She's got the idea and I bet in a year will look better.

>> No.10041178
File: 516 KB, 750x918, DCD97A48-EA92-4AC9-96AD-89DD6E6D86C6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10041178

>> No.10041198

>>10041129
It really depends, as >>10041167 said. In some regions and cultures it’s acceptable for women to wear heavy makeup and bare underarms/calves with hijab, in others they’re not even allowed to wear pants and have to wear loose floor-length garments that completely obscure their body shape. These girls seem to be at a kind of middle ground.

>> No.10041222

>>10041110
Middle one with the Hello Kitty plush would have actually looked decent if it weren’t for that harsh animu doll makeup

>> No.10041263

>>10041147
yes...

>> No.10041268
File: 139 KB, 750x914, 8567028A-FF6E-4118-9EAE-F7FDCAA7BE79.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10041268

Under the “lolita fashion” tag

>> No.10041271

>>10041268
Reach harder

>> No.10041273

>>10041268
This is fine lol. Change the hair style and add better accessories

>> No.10041280

>>10041268
Probably the correct place for it tee bee aitch! Looks fine, maybe could use a couple of accessories, but certainly not offensive

>> No.10041284
File: 210 KB, 750x870, EC4F91D7-EB40-4D47-AC8B-D0A85E99A6A2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10041284

>> No.10041286

>>10040758
white trash

>> No.10041307

>>10041081
This doesn't make sense,Anon.

>> No.10041308

>>10041284
replace weird with obese and we got a winner

>> No.10041315
File: 98 KB, 182x202, snapback sass.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10041315

>>10041284

>> No.10041341

>>10041268
I think shes cute! All she needs is better socks/shoes and maybe curl her hair with a higher hairstyle

>> No.10041345
File: 119 KB, 750x798, B70D58C1-5A4C-4DB4-B3DA-5AEEB62404E7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10041345

>> No.10041346

>>10041284
>Insert neck pun

Seriously why. The tutu, the mini skirt, the blue wig... All of it is so bad. It's like an ita mix of fairy kei and Bodyline

>> No.10041347

>>10041345
What style is this supposed to be? Looks like a weird modern interpretation of ren faire garb

>> No.10041351
File: 607 KB, 750x915, 530C9897-962A-420F-B5A1-C433DA345DAE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10041351

>>10041345

>> No.10041390

>>10041315
Gotta love Bob

>> No.10041395

>>10041351
Looks like a Halloween costume so free pass for looking bad

>> No.10041397

>>10041395
all her coords look like this so no

>> No.10041412

>>10041110
??? Am I the only one who thinks they all look nice? I mean look at the rest of this thread in comparison...

>> No.10041419

>>10041412
I think they all look great, the one with the hello kitty doll could use some help imo that makeup is so bleh and the dress doesn’t look very high quality imo but I love the girl in the bodyline coord on the left desu

>> No.10041428

>>10041110
What's the point of this?

Isn't hijab supposed to be worn to show modesty and not bring attention to one's self?

>> No.10041430

>>10041428
You can't criticise that, they're empowering themselves! /s

>> No.10041431
File: 732 KB, 750x892, AFBEF4C6-8B6C-4803-9CC6-48770BFB6872.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10041431

>> No.10041436

>>10041110
I hate this, either do it correctly or leave it

>>10041351
This genuinely frightens me

>> No.10041445

>>10041428
It’s a cultural thing now more than a religion thing.

>> No.10041449

>>10041345
They cannot be serious with this. How embarrassing.

>> No.10041450

>>10041315
My reaction to the original image.

>> No.10041453

>>10040723
Eugh I hate the gore cute aesthetic

>> No.10041460

>>10041307
Sorry, 4chan sent me angsty. It was a cruel and heartless joke and I'm sorry I posted it.

>> No.10041526

>>10041453
It never comes off as genuine gore and it's always, always cringey.

>> No.10041536

>>10041412
I too think there is nothing much wrong with them, most likely nitpick tier if anything. Someone is just racist-chan

>> No.10041548
File: 1.20 MB, 1080x1213, Screenshot_20181123-004114.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10041548

>> No.10041552

>>10041548
wow, how timely and culturally relevant

>> No.10041598

>>10041536
I looks awful, if you think otherwise you have no taste. Baggy pants underneath the dress, wtf.

>> No.10041611

>>10041548
At least she's wearing bloomers...

>> No.10041619

>>10041548
Miley Cyrus Kei

>> No.10041623

>>10041598
Apparently you’re racist.

>> No.10041625

>>10041110
pants with lolita will always be ita

>> No.10041634

>>10041548
>>10041552
isn't this a pic from like. last year or a couple years ago?

>> No.10041643

>>10041598
2 is fine; 1 and 4 are not completely awful; 3 is terrible.

>> No.10041644

>>10041110
>>10041598
>>10041623
>>10041625
These girls are trying to enjoy the fashion to the best of their ability given their cultural restrictions. Hijab lolita is a thing (We used to have a practicing Muslim in our comm), and I'm actually surprised that some Malaysian or Indian lolita dress brand hasn't popped up yet. Take your edgelord Muslim-hate to another thread. Besides, shalwar kameez are designed to be worn under a dress or long tunic. They're not "pants". Educate yourself before you sound like an idiot.

>> No.10041645
File: 562 KB, 1200x998, ita.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10041645

>>10041644
seething. its ugly and they are itas

>> No.10041676

>>10041645
It's ugly, but they're not itas.

They have a grasp of lolita, but they're limited by their religion.

>> No.10041682

>>10041676
I suggested a tights, long bloomers, and knee-length boot combo upthread. Why can't they do that?
Additionally, the religion/culture argument is fucking bullshit. At what point does it stop being lolita? What if someone couldn't wear a petticoat or a blouse because of some strange religious practice but still had a jsk? Would it still be lolita?
Beleive it or not, religion, to most people in the world, is a fucking choice. So is the clothing they put on themselves. If you put together a shitty combination like upthread pic, people have every right to be put off by it.

>> No.10041685

>>10041682
>Religion is a choice for most people
Bwahahahaha!
>What if some weird religion banned pettis
Since lolita is (mainly) about a silhouette, and these girls can accomplish said silhouette within their religion, it's still lolita. Their legwear may throw it off a little, but not to the point that it's unrecognizable as lolita. Honestly I've seen hijab lolita done better, but these girls don't deserve to be here over legwear that's part of their culture.

>> No.10041691

>>10041685
Religion is a choice for a good percent of people fucktard, and if those pink itas upthread can spend hundres on pastel japanese dresses and actually wear them, then yes, it's a choice. I really don't care how people express themelves through their religion, this isn't about that. It doesn't change that, as unfortunate as it is, their religious practices don't translate well as a part of a fashion based on old european fashion. What part of that don't you understand??? Religion isn't an excuse any more than being autistic is. If it looks bad it looks bad, end of story.
>Lolita is about a silhouette
You're absolutely right. And being ita is about being painful to look at, which those aweful pants absolutely are.
They have a right to wear those pants, and I have a right to think they're fucking ugly.

>> No.10041694

>>10041685
I have a cultural dress that is made with the same silhouette and as lolita fashion. The dress is kitchy and covered in contrasting bright colours. I guess because it's a cultural thing, I can wear it with a btssb headbow and no one can say it's ugly or not really lolita!!!!
Thank you anon for opening my eyes. I can't wait to go dressed up to my local com and dab on all the haters!

>> No.10041775

>>10041634
No it's from this year

>> No.10041780

>>10041147
>>10041263
I smell someone here having a vendetta now.

>> No.10041786

>>10041780
>>10041147
>>10041263
It wasn’t posted last ita thread that I remember. Just a lot of dissent on it in the COF thread. Honestly I think
>>10041268 and >>10041268
just need changes to the hair, lose the utks, and better accessories.

>> No.10041827

>>10041623
against what race, itas?

>> No.10041829

>>10041644
oh, fuck off. you can dislike something aesthetically without hating muslims as a whole.

>> No.10041830

>>10041644
>>10041676
Ita is ita, bad looks is bad looks. It's that easy. If it clashes with your beliefs, tough luck, get another hobby or do it anyway and look awful. Just goes to show that some beliefs/customs are limiting personal freedom and belong in the bin.

>>10041682
>>10041691
this

>>10041685
Cosplay lolitas are recognizable, they still look like shit.
You supporting this nonsense is you supporting girls limiting themselves and being limited to some regressive beliefs.

>> No.10041834

>>10041829
also, it's not like all muslim girls wear headscarfs, I'm sure most muslim lolitas just dress normally because it's not a revealing fashion.

>> No.10041840

>>10041623

Reddit's back that way

>> No.10041843

What does ITA stand for?

>> No.10041845

>>10041843
In the ass

>> No.10041846

>>10041845
It only makes it bigger

>> No.10041850

>>10041685
The pants do ruin the silhouette though. They should wear long length or tea length dresses and boots

>> No.10041860

>>10041850
I wouldn't even mind the pants if they were fitted and not baggy. And I don't mean a skinny fit either, a straight cut would make miles of difference

>> No.10041861
File: 137 KB, 1024x952, Amino.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10041861

Alright gulls, this actually got me thinking. What do we want?

Let's answer this Amino secret personally where we're just as honest and anonymous as we want to.

>> No.10041864

>>10041110
Whether you're a mudslime or whatever stupid religion that forbid you from showing knees because men are gonna cream their pants over uncovered legs,it looks bad. Dresses with pants look terrible . Also the big headbows on top of the hijabs makes them look like easter eggs, it's unflattering.
I feel bad for those girls "trapped" in a religious freak country who just want to wear cute stuff.

>>10041138
this

>> No.10041865

>>10041861
I'd say apologize on said social media you did the dumb thing on and if anyone is being a bitch afterwards,disregard them. If you recognize you did wrong and apologized/made up for it, anyone trying to start shit after that is just drama hungry.
Depends on the gravity of said thing too,but i do agree that gulls can be quick to rip someone apart and we can be ruthless.

>> No.10041866

>>10041861
The thing about this is that people on this board love to make something out of nothing, and if they even think it bothers you, they’ll keep going until you either quit being in public view at all or kill yourself. Because it’ll never be enough for everyone.
You’ll get people saying “it was insincere”, “she’s still a cunt”, “that won’t make me stop hating her”, “what a half asses apology”, etc.
It won’t stop until cgl and lolcow die. Which they won’t. Because people love to call others out on things they’re guilty of themselves.

>> No.10041867

>>10041268
lmaoooo im dead i know this girl

>> No.10041871

>>10041866
this desu

>> No.10041886
File: 5 KB, 580x66, ita.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10041886

>>10041843

>> No.10041887

>>10040044
Yikes this is the girl who wore that tacky CDC replica to rufflecon. Nice to see she just always has bad taste no matter what

>> No.10041975
File: 370 KB, 470x551, ff7ef9_7e0264c36d7a4b97833dafa5e36c996d_mv2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10041975

https://www.eewedesign.com/sweet-lolita

>> No.10041989

>>10040976
Yes this is poop chan

>> No.10042068

>>10041975
>background Pampers?
>unko & blue abomination with wonky ribbons
>name is literally ew
They betta be trollin

>> No.10042069

>>10041975
IT'S 500 FUCKING EUROS! I'd pay that for a male stripper before I'd waste it on this abomination. Hell, I can buy two jetj dresses on the 2nd hand market for that.

>> No.10042074
File: 21 KB, 394x251, ayO0h4m.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042074

>>10041975
uhh what the FUCK

>> No.10042076

>>10040315
Can we not pick on actual minors?

>> No.10042078

>>10042076
Wrong kind of "minor" dummy. VR is in her 40's, dont worry.

>> No.10042091

Wow you people really like to bring other people down.

>> No.10042092

>>10041268
the shoes are what really fuck this up, without the shoes it's passable

>> No.10042093

>>10042091
welcome to the internet

>> No.10042097

>>10042092
That hair isn't passable in any universe.

>> No.10042105
File: 29 KB, 500x345, panicked honk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042105

>>10041975
>https://www.eewedesign.com/sweet-lolita

>> No.10042109 [DELETED] 

>>10040749
>radical feminist
It's out of the norm, not typical sexual, and feminine. Sadly, it's kinda common for such fashions to attract radical feminists. It allows them to say they dress for themselves and dislike society norms.

Far from all lolita's are like this, but the nature of radical feminists makes them easily come to fashions like this, so we have a decent amount I fear. And we dislike them too, that's why they end up posted here, and then they cry about is not liking feminazi aesthetic.

Feminazi's are also regularly fat because they don't need to be pretty for men. People need to accept them for who they are and love them for the inner-self (even when they tend to be dumb and toxic), so there is your fat part.

>> No.10042110
File: 846 KB, 720x721, IMG_20181124_124237.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042110

>>10042105
Only €440 before tax!

And that website is an eyesore. Who looks at a normal website and says "I really feel this could be improved by adding a bunch of scribbles and setting the font to illegible colors?

>> No.10042114

>>10041861
If it's really big, make a public appoligy. Otherwise just forget about it. Acknowledge your mistakes, improve, go on with life. There is new drama on cgl pretty much every day. Being posted might seem big, but if you actually improve your attitude and looks, no one will look down on you. Worst that could happen is people might laugh at the past, but then, if you can acknowledge it, it rarely will be a big deal. You most likely end up as an example of how someone went from shitty to better... cgl tends to acknowledged improvement as well as mistakes in my experience, as long as there actually are improvements. They ain't gonna make improvements up to make you feel good.

>> No.10042115 [DELETED] 

>>10040749
Radical feminists believe the current state of fat acceptance is bullshit tho, just as bad if not worse than traditional beauty standards. At least the traditional ones don't make you immobile and don't give you beetus.
>fuckur beauty standards
>men want to fuck my fatfolds not bones
Mess Dumpster isn't a radical feminist, she's a dumpster fire thirsty for dick.

>> No.10042116 [DELETED] 

>>10042115
>Radical feminists believe the current state of fat acceptance is bullshit tho
Not the ones I meet. The ones I meet are full of contradictions and stupidity, and tend to be pro inclusivity.
>I dress like this for myself, I don't care what men think.
>but men should totally accept me no matter how I look because it's about the inside.
>Me being fat is just as pretty as that sexy woman with perfect body.
>But don't you dare to like her body because it's sexy, we're not sex objects!
I guess being fat goes well with not wanting to be a sex object tho. Very few want to fuck wales.

>> No.10042120

>>10042110
I don't mind this shirt's design at all, I'm a sucker for florals. That being said, the thread had better be spun gold for that price

>> No.10042126
File: 169 KB, 720x960, 8C74717C-9DE5-4863-BCE9-84E92A2D9711.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042126

>not Lolita
Also dear God why is this girl still here? The entire UK community hates her.

>> No.10042128

>>10042110
>>10042120
You can do better--Besides mismatching the fabric types, which is usually a bad idea, the solid fabric looks slick and cheap. If the whole blouse was the floral this would have been way better.

>> No.10042135

>>10042116
Of course not, Wales has just over 3 million people in it, you'd be fucking exhausted.

>> No.10042152
File: 103 KB, 750x639, A1FAD4FF-9A3B-4564-8F93-CF1763B56FF2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042152

>>10042126

>> No.10042154

>>10042152
oh wow this is so cringey and arrogant lol

>> No.10042165
File: 228 KB, 1242x906, IMG_5025.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042165

She also makes super embarrassing posts like these lmao

>> No.10042167

I've literally never seen a lolita praising a living doll??? like, where is she getting this from lmao

>> No.10042169

>>10042167
She was probably getting praise from normies who thought she looked cute

>> No.10042172

>>10042169
Oh because normies have the best idea of what is cute... >.> The normies that I encounter either call me a princess or ask if i'm doing victorian re-enactment and neither of those responses inspire great trust in their judgement desu.

>> No.10042189

>>10042152
Lmao who is this? Was she that super embarrassing girl on that show with Venus and the guy who wanted to be a living Ken doll?

>> No.10042202

>>10042189
https://youtu.be/Gn0KT5oYH3I

>> No.10042223

>>10042202
Bless those hosts, to be honest. They could have taken it in a completely different direction, but they were kind and did their best to relate.

>> No.10042231
File: 106 KB, 625x960, 46789748_1144295642402368_4149397956551770112_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042231

>replica
>one million different shades of pink
>thatsamanbaby.jpeg

>> No.10042234

>>10042165
oh wow poor whoever the fuck that is

>> No.10042238

>>10042234
i hope this is sarcasm cuz she literally posts this kinda shit every day and then posts fucking walmart kei in COF and then goes on national tv to talk about her being a doll xD

>> No.10042251 [DELETED] 

>>10042109
>>10042115
>>10042116
Reading this shit is like being in a circle jerk for retards

>> No.10042255
File: 366 KB, 750x706, EC53E02F-1EF6-45F5-99E8-F27F6E4F8983.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042255

>> No.10042257
File: 571 KB, 750x736, 4644D417-E371-4D7F-976B-0AEBEBAD6CDF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042257

>>10042255

>> No.10042260

>>10042202
Oh it’s that girl? I don’t recall anyone making fun of her when that video dropped. I know “living doll” was the term itas used as an excuse to not take concrit and feel more special but I always thought she used the word “doll” in exchange for Lolita so she wouldn’t have to do the whole “Lolita isn’t a fetish” conversation.
Too bad. I thought she was a normal person. Looks like the attention got to her head.

>> No.10042262

>>10042255
The faces the girls in the background are making are priceless.

>> No.10042266

>>10042260
Unfortunately I think she uses living doll as an excuse to not have to adhere to lolita rules :/ She honestly thinks she's some kind of celebrity, it's weird. But oh well.

>> No.10042272

>>10042266
>She honestly thinks she's some kind of celebrity, it's weird.

That's what I thought too, but she only has ~15 likes on her profile pictures...? Doesn't sound popular at all.

>> No.10042284

>>10041645
What's this from?

>> No.10042288

>>10042272
I get more likes on my profile pictures and I’m not remotely efamous, and I only have like 70 friends on my fb. It’s sad either way that people are shitty to her, but she sounds really deluded after that tlc thing, so it kind of can’t be helped.

>> No.10042295

>>10042255
What am I looking at and why is there not a single nice wig or hairstyle in the entire group

>> No.10042296

>>10042266
>>10042172
Please stop using emoji

>> No.10042300

>>10042288
Same, my most liked propic has 70 likes and I have less than 500 friends. To have 15 likes must mean your the opposite of popular lol

>> No.10042306

>>10042296
wtf is wrong with using emoji?

>> No.10042308

>>10042272
>>10042288
Exactly... Last I heard she went to MCM London Comic Con and threw a hissy fit when a photographer wanted a photo of another lolita next to her rather than her.

>> No.10042317
File: 349 KB, 720x720, C6B3C6EA-ADC0-49CF-8367-B7C4F8AE8570.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042317

>>10042306

>> No.10042318

>>10042308
That’s fucking tragic lmao...

>> No.10042362

>>10041548
This kinda stuff makes me feel like people are mocking lolita style. Like if you have no respect for our hobby gtfo.

>> No.10042370

>>10042091
Hahaha you’re on the wrong thread anon. Go back to amino.

>> No.10042391

>>10042231
Sissy

>> No.10042396

>>10042238
I don't know how that could possibly be interpreted as anything but sarcasm
Literally look at how it's worded

>> No.10042411

>>10040044
The skirt and shoes have a lot of potential together and she's actually got a cute face, she could go all the way and be adorable. But of course, instead she coords like a trash fire and puts it on the internet like it's something to be proud of.

>> No.10042414
File: 538 KB, 750x832, EDBC850D-8CCA-44E1-A71F-A3627F8B12A4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042414

>> No.10042416
File: 575 KB, 750x732, BC1AC9F8-1E22-4C3E-8398-8C96BF88A333.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042416

>>10042414

>> No.10042427

>>10042231
I too struggle to match my pinks, I never have a pink bag while wearing a pink focused coord eugh, plus it’s so insulting when people wear replicas like you don’t deserve the dress if you can’t find it/don’t have the money bye. People who claim their in this fashion have 0 respect for it sometimes.

>> No.10042429

>>10042414
Cursed image

>> No.10042431

>>10042414
Hope the skirt is a replica, no brand deserves this nightmare

>> No.10042443

>>10042416
>>10042414
God these are fucking nightmares. The lace on them makes them look like real brand, too...

>> No.10042445

>>10042443
This blue color was really popular, it couldn't have been cheap.

>> No.10042451
File: 446 KB, 750x923, 1BB93BC1-8F5D-4583-9EF1-DA7BB77BDA87.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042451

>> No.10042452
File: 402 KB, 750x742, FC438D51-2650-4635-8C2A-F22450C78629.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042452

>>10042451

>> No.10042453
File: 310 KB, 750x926, 991CDDAB-1FFE-497B-AB07-9911A2B0455A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042453

>>10042452

>> No.10042456

>>10042451
This could be decent with a better blouse and if she curled or poofed her hair

>> No.10042459

>>10042451
This is fixable if she's only starting out

>> No.10042478
File: 229 KB, 618x712, FEBFB10F-FB1B-4E6A-B874-C93C9FEBEFA7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042478

>> No.10042531

>>10042453
not lolita

>> No.10042623
File: 100 KB, 1162x557, jade.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042623

>>10042260
People hate her because at one point on a tv show (100% hotter iirc) she told everyone that she intentionally dressed as a 5 year old and used gross hashtags to advertise it on her insta

>also shes a media whore

https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/5188315/woman-look-like-porcelain-doll/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5201455/Retail-worker-spends-10-000-bid-look-like-DOLL.html

>> No.10042679

>>10042202
oh man she is so unfortunate looking

>> No.10042742

>>10042623
>#toddlerfashion

Gross

>> No.10042784

>>10042531
Yea so why do you think it’s posted here, dumbass?

>> No.10042787

>>10042443
>>10042445
Think this is the special set which goes for a reasonable price now.

>> No.10042800
File: 261 KB, 1134x2015, F1FFECCF-C7AC-4D0B-9FF2-855EDC06FA42.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042800

Does this count as Lolita? The surge of weird pseudo Lolita right now is confusing

>> No.10042807 [DELETED] 

>>10042116
The moment they even care a little about being accepted by men is when you know they're not radical feminists, they're just larping.

>> No.10042808

>>10042800
I don't consider it lolita.

>> No.10042809

>>10042165
>why me? why me??
>the answer's always: BPD

>>10042167
Literally everyone in the public eye gets trolled and posted on the chins. She's delusional.

>> No.10042812

>>10042202
>spent 20,000 bongbucks
>that poundstore lipstick
>tiara like some toddlers & tiaras reject
>imaginary disease all snowflakes have
>muh cundishuns!
>like some hambeast without being a ham wtf
>doesn't even pull her skirt down to sit
>Jade
>apex chav name
She's never gonna make it.

>> No.10042814

>>10042231
I want to learn krav maga just to roundkick these perverts in the hairy chin.

>> No.10042816

>>10042091
Gosh, it's like we're with the hacker called Fohrchan.

>> No.10042818

>>10042453
New Miss Piggy design?

>> No.10042825

>>10041110
>your in the wrong neighborhood faggot

>> No.10042828

>>10042453
This is not lolita and she isn't trying to pass it as such.

>> No.10042831

>>10042478
From the thumbnail I thought this was gonna be a spoopy japanese ghost cosplay. It turned out to be more horrifying.

>> No.10042885

>>10041861
The last time I did anything noteworthy from cgl's standpoint was over 5 years ago, but now and then it gets rehashed anyways and some people probably hear about it and decide to judge me based on that or to avoid me. That's fine, honestly. I've done everything I possibly could to rectify my mistakes and make amends with the actual people involved, and we're all cool now, so if a lurker or bystander thinks "this is how anon is, I know because I saw it on cgl" then I don't really have to energy to try to convince them otherwise. You've gotta just move on.

>> No.10042903

>>10042167
Many living dolls who got in media lately weren't lolita's, more barbie. The closest thing is one Russian one was called lolita. They where also ridiculed but there where also lovers.

The only one that was maybe somewhat positively received was that one with the medical condition where her muzzles slowly broke down until she couldn't move and had to be tilted to anywhere by her bf. But that was more a "I rather not see lolita attached to this, but good that she found a way to cope with that medical condition".

>> No.10042908
File: 828 KB, 1177x2048, 9E316CA1-8389-4C48-8F39-D2290C5DF41D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042908

>> No.10042910 [DELETED] 

>>10042807
No, they are radical feminist in the same way most of the modern feminist are, just more extreme. Idiots who want stuff for free in their favour and act like they are more belittled than they are in hope of getting that, only using the arguments that are in their favour at that moment, no matter if it contradicts previous statements from them.

Those statements aren't said after each other. That was just me showing how they lack actual logic. But a lot of them have made both pro-fat acceptance statements and feminist statements, or any kind of pro-inclusivity statements whenever it helped them get stuff they wanted for less effort than others have to do for it.

>> No.10042914

>>10042908
It needs work but it's not awful. Put some makeup on, tho.

>> No.10042920

>>10042908
nitpick. She should have closed the collar of that blouse (maybe add a red bow at her neck) and wore shoes that fitted better in colour, but it's not good by any means, but it's not painful enough to be ita.

>> No.10042921 [DELETED] 

>>10042807

>no true feminist

Every fucking time

>> No.10042922

>>10042914
She's obviously wearing eyebrow pencil and it looks like light to dark brownish eyeshadow. Also either her skin is amazing or she wears foundation. Natural make-up is fine anon, unless your coord is so ott it makes your face disappear without more ott make-up.

>> No.10042923

>>10042920
What? It's so bad it's not even lolita. Not the office shirt, not the retro circle skirt, not the retro t-strap shoes, not the hat... Nothing in this "coord" is lolita and the random green purse is just awful. It's like she fucked up a vintage outfit

>> No.10042926

>>10042922
She's wearing a hat, big pigtails, has decent poof and her coord isn't pastel or nude, it's black with really intense colors. She is wearing makeup, but it's not fitting or flattering. Some lipcolor (exept nude) would be the bare minimum, also blush. Completely nude lips just drown in lolita.

>> No.10042928

>>10042923
That's not an office shirt, not even close. It has (bad quality) lace, and a lacy, somewhat bigger collar.
That kind of shoe are more often worn in classic lolita, but the colour has to change to something more matching.
Simple hats like that are worn in more daily coords more often. For some casual lolita it's fine.
The skirt looks like it might very well be a simple lolita skirt. It has cupcake shape and it doesn't look awkward forced in it.

The bag I find arguably okay with the rose leaves, but only if the roses/green theme comes back somewhere else.

>> No.10042932

>>10042926
disagreed. She has a lot to improve upon, but I'm not bothered by her make-up.

Also, that ain't big pigtails, they are to braids pinned back up. And black doesn't make OTT. You never seen casual alternative people? They don't always wear big fancy OTT make-up. Daily stuff like this is fine.

Honestly, I agree on a different lipstick, but I would go more natural pink instead of near skin colour nude. Bright lips would look horrible on her.

>> No.10042937

>>10042928
You're the unpopular opinion here, this bitch is ita. You probably look just like her. Blouse is of poor quality and much too small for her, the white shoes don't match, plain black tights make it look drab, the skirt is so sub par, granny made that. Where the hell does the purse fit in? Nothing about this is a good lolita coord.

>> No.10042938

>>10040075
Bad cardi fit is nitpick. This is not ita and pretty good for plus sweet, and BL at that

>> No.10042940

>>10041975
I can't believe she still continues to produce ugly af lolita clothing while apparently being actually succesful otherwise. She has been to Vancouver and London Fashion Week and is going to be in Tokyo's 2019. It's hard to believe because her Finnish is bad and she is trying to recruit (apparently unpaid) "workers" which is really unprofessional. I have so many questions about her and her career.

>> No.10042941

>>10040213
Whew, you're not very bright are you?

>> No.10042945

>>10042928
When nothing is specifically lolita you don't look lolita. Loliables only work when you have some actual lolita pieces to carry the aesthetic. Basic ass T-straps and felt hats bring down even nicer coords to look more casual and normie, here's there's nothing nice to bring down so it just looks like a normie got dressed in the dark

>> No.10042949

>>10041682
>IIIIiii suggested...
>WHY can't they follow MY logic?
I'm sorry but this is a classic faithless American white person response. I am not and will never be muslim and even I understand the restrictions. Get some perspective that extends beyond the tip of your nose, sweaty.

>> No.10042951

>>10042135
Ilu anon

>> No.10042957
File: 277 KB, 1476x1920, FB_IMG_1543166912859.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10042957

>> No.10042960

>>10042957
Agh, so close yet so far. If she takes concrit, this could be fixed.

>> No.10042963

>>10042949
>american white person
I'm from Bosnia, kek. But you just keep wearing your ugly lolita coords, sweaty

>> No.10042967

>>10042932
I never said anything about OTT? Her outfit is hardly lolita anyway and no contrast in the face, especially when there is a lot of contrast everywhere else, looks bad, period.

>> No.10042976

>>10042949
>someone has an opinion about a culture/religion
>"You must be amerikkkan scum REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"

>> No.10042995

>>10042967
When you're only defence to saying casual make-up is fine on lolita unless you go OTT is this:
>She's wearing a hat, big pigtails, has decent poof and her coord isn't pastel or nude, it's black with really intense colors
It sounds like that is too OTT for you to wear natural make-up.

Also nice change from
>Put some makeup on, tho.
to
>She is wearing makeup, but it's not fitting or flattering.

I stay with my point tho. Natural looking make-up is common even in gothic lolita ever since the start of the fashion, so "black with intense colour" is a bullshit excuse imho. The lips would be better in the natural pink-ish shade close to what peoples lips are than in this nude colour (she doesn't have a nice shape at her lips nor the area around, I don't think she should draw attention with bold colours there), but her make-up isn't even near the thing that makes her look bad here. It's her clothes. Beside her lips, her face doesn't disappear in the coord. her eyebrows are speaking, and the eyeshadow give her eyes enough dept for casual wear. Only the lips look gone, I hating those more and more the more I look at it. Looking at the face also makes me hate those rose earrings. She should have picked red ones to go with the skirt, not skin coloured ones that look like her ear is misshaped.

>> No.10042999

>>10042091
So which picture is yours, anon?

>> No.10043011

>>10042416
>iridescent mickey ears are a recently released product
>meaning this picture was taken this year
oof

>> No.10043014

>>10042800
Are you sure her intention was to dress lolita? It looks like a closet Wednesday Adams costume

>> No.10043018

>>10042416
At least the girl on the left is cute.

>> No.10043020

>>10042995
I'm not defending anything, and no, accessories does not mean ott.
Natural makeup doesn't equal nude or unflattering.
Also I did not make the post that says "put on makeup" .

Her makeup looks bad, you can sperg all you want.

>> No.10043033

>>10043014
She posted it on Closet of frills anon...

>> No.10043040

>>10043033
Oh god that's horrible

>> No.10043059

>>10042800
Between the tea length and sack dresses it’s been tricky for me to decide if really toned down coord like this count as lolita. Either way she’s in need of some headwear.

>> No.10043062 [DELETED] 

>>10042957
lmao the only thing that's lolita about this is the skirt. This girl needs to get rid of alla that and try again.

>> No.10043063

>>10042957
I'm cracking up at that tiny ass bow on her head

>> No.10043073 [DELETED] 

>>10042910
Nayrt but I think you’re confused about the terms. Radical feminism isn’t just “feminism but more extreme and annoying”, it’s oldschool feminism. What you’re describing is modern liberal “everything I do and want is feminist and empowering because I say so” choice feminism. I don’t think there are many actual radfems in lolita, because the blatant consumerism, impracticality and focus on physical appearance kind of fly in the face of their core beliefs. Most radfems I’ve met wear simple comfy clothes and don’t care about looking cute. I think the main thing lolitas and radfems have in common is not caring about being appealing to men.

>>10042921
Well yeah, words mean things. Someone who is overly concerned with appealing to men isn’t a radfem just like someone who only ever wears jeans isn’t a lolita. It’s not about moral purity, it’s about definitions.

>> No.10043113

>>10042257
The one where they are sitting back to back makes them both look pregnant.

>> No.10043115 [DELETED] 

>>10043073
radical feminism is a political position. there are plenty of radfems who are overly concerned about appealing to men just like there are militant conservative christians who have a gay affair on the side. it's about what politics you espouse, not whether you're a massive hypocrite or not

>> No.10043157
File: 203 KB, 750x760, BDFA91DF-52A3-45EB-83F4-6CA32EEB0A4B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10043157

My eyes actually hurt

>> No.10043166

>>10043157
wasn't this posted a few threads back lol get new content fag

>> No.10043176

>>10043166
NAYRT but wow calm down salt-chan

>> No.10043178
File: 587 KB, 1440x1788, why.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10043178

what are thoooooose

>> No.10043188

>>10043157
I hate that i dont hate this. The tights are eh and the wig is cheap but i like the idea of the colors. But maybe i have shit taste desu

>> No.10043189

>>10043157
What are thooooose

Seriously though, they're so awful in this color but could look okay in black with a punk coord

>> No.10043191

>>10042478
What's up with these girls with long rapunzel hair that do absolutely fuck-all with it, style-wise?

>> No.10043197

>>10043191
That just looks like a long ebay wig, anon.

>> No.10043198

>>10043197
Does it? The photo looks like it was edited with a potato and a prayer, I can't tell if it's a wig or not.

>> No.10043204

>>10042189
fun fact: that girl got implants and became a patreon thot. there is zero evidence of her lolita past on her social media

>> No.10043217

>>10043157
ayrt, this was posted on ig /today/ so no lol try again, salty bloomers

>> No.10043218

>>10043217
meant for >>10043166

>> No.10043220
File: 235 KB, 750x919, 6AFDB759-2C05-455C-A667-6966670FC7A7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10043220

>trying to pass this replica as actual AP
most embarrassing behavior desu

>> No.10043222
File: 201 KB, 750x914, 2C00F932-D677-4A46-90C2-EFA810DF7FBF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10043222

>>10043220

>> No.10043225

>>10043204
Woah! Really? I’m morbidly curious where can I look her up?

>> No.10043241

>>10043157
Other than the shoes I like this, it reminds me of Creamy Mami.

>> No.10043243

>>10043225
Nvm I found her. Christ it’s a shame. She looked a lot cuter in Lolita/dolly/j-fashions then this shit.

>> No.10043244

>>10043220
Sauce on the blouse tho?

>> No.10043276

>>10043204
She was never into lolita. She just jumped on the dolly fashion bandwagon and worked with Dolldelight to try and help with her efame

>> No.10043352
File: 101 KB, 750x745, 85B5ED43-4712-4B22-B26D-2A43ECA9F84A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10043352

>>10043222
attention all dumb thots: tutus are not lolita fashion

>> No.10043359

>>10043204
>>10043243
Care to share? I don't know who this is

>> No.10043365

>>10043204
that's not true??? she posts lolita stuff: https://www.instagram.com/princessjadette/?hl=en

>> No.10043368

>>10043365
I believe the anon was talking about the girl from My Strange Addiction. She was already into cosplay when the episode aired

>> No.10043380

>>10043352
How is m lolita the new “my parents didn’t pay enough attention to me” trend?
I hate it.

>> No.10043399
File: 176 KB, 540x960, 12096349_1083257675025278_4476987054892305737_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10043399

>> No.10043400

>>10041691
God, you really don't fucking understand Islam, do you?
There are countries where the penalty for apostasy is death. Even in developed countries, people can be condemned, harassed, and threatened with physical violence by their family members or members of the muslim community for apostasizing. It's not like these are some SJW white girls who decided to collect snowflake points by converting to Islam.

>> No.10043402

>>10042296
Those are emoticons

>> No.10043410

>>10043399
wtf is going here?

>> No.10043420

>>10043410
>>10043399
i wanna know wtf those girls in the background are wearing. goodness!

>> No.10043512

>>10043178
Are those wings her actual hair?

>> No.10043513

>>10043512
They're obviously made of feathers, have you ever seen real hair in your life?

>> No.10043514

>>10043513
lmaooo

>> No.10043515

>>10043513
They have almost the same color, so I thought it was hair. Guess I'm blind

>> No.10043639
File: 519 KB, 750x746, E5FFEE3A-83A0-44EF-8DAD-478D5A1254B0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10043639

>> No.10043650

>>10043400
NAYRT generally, in these places they are also not allowed to wear weird frilly pink fashion tho. The ones that can are in the fashion tend to be muslims with a lot more freedom than the ones you talk about. I think this was already mentioned anyways

>> No.10043738

Ott but Do you guys think randoserus are allowed in sweet lolita? I got bashed in a fb comm because i said randoserus are ageplay and have no place in lolita

>> No.10043744

>>10043738
they're fine imo
>ageplay meme

>> No.10043755

>>10043738
>ageplay

What the fuck. It's just a bag. It's like a cosplay staple and people wear them with seifuku without being ageplay too.

>> No.10043760

>>10043755
It is a bag only worn by elementary students. Is lolita cosplay now? Its ageplayish

>> No.10043829
File: 796 KB, 1200x1600, 1535658726065.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10043829

>>10043738
I think its fine, if you're in the west most people don't know what a randoseru is or that it's for kids, so i think most people will not attribute it to ageplay.

>> No.10043832

>>10043365
she's so ugly

>> No.10043864

>>10043178
This is a nitpick at best.

>> No.10043883

>>10043738
I think ageplay is a huge reach. Randoseru in adult sizes are becoming more and more common in glorious Nippon, and not for ageplay purposes;

they’re very roomy, durable bags that last a long time and can be passed down because they’re good quality. They’re not fucking cheap in price either. What’s not to want, especially as a college student or working person?
there’s my wank on it though.

>> No.10043886

>>10043738
That's like saying being into dolls is ageplay because dolls are for kids. It's just a bag, anon. A comfortable, sleek one at that. I'd rather see more randoseru at meets than another fucking Kanken bag.

>> No.10043902

>>10042885
why do I feel like this is simply26
>>10042908
Not enough frills and the color-blocking is strange. I feel like the only thing salvageable here is her shoes. There's just too much normie-tier styling happening to make this visually interesting.

>>10042938
She looks like an orb. That shit don't fit no matter how you slice it.

>>10042957
This could work as somewhat casual with a cardigan, a removal of that bow, and a re-evaluation of whatever the fuck is going on with that legwear/shoes.

>> No.10043908

>>10042903
>muzzles

>> No.10043911
File: 59 KB, 640x853, 2483F78C-D0B0-4A63-A860-725682842840.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10043911

nasty

>> No.10043912

>>10043639
I think this dress would be really cute worn regularly. but definitely not lolita lol

>> No.10043919

>>10043829
>posts a literal fetishist

>> No.10043941

>>10043911
where's this pic from?

>> No.10043943

>>10043911
God this girl looks like she doesn’t shower.

>> No.10043959

>>10041536
Hating a religion that considers women an object isn't racist. I hope these girls escape this religion and/or country and denounce it.

>> No.10044010

>>10043911
I want that nice chair.

>> No.10044011

>>10043919
a liar, in the ita thread?
lying ain't cute. it makes you an auto-ita.

>> No.10044037

>>10043220
Honest question, how can you tell?

>> No.10044051

>>10044037
The print isn't crisp,and the colors are off, the shoulder straps are wrong, the bottom lace is too long, the bow is not the same shape and is super floppy, incorrect lace around the bodice top border....

>> No.10044093

>>10043911
>what is a bra

>> No.10044128

>>10043157
I really dont like this, but it's more nitpick. the wig, tights, and shoes, should be swapped. I don't really like this persons coordinates when i see them, but I hope they improve.
>>10044011
>>10043919
the guy is a fetishist for latex and shit but its unclear about lolita. his coordinates are cute as shit though, he's cuter than 99% of lolitas

>> No.10044129

>>10043941
r/Lolita

>> No.10044179

>>10043919
He posts latex fetish stuff sometimes which is gross but I don’t think lolita is so much a fetish for him as it is a hobby.
>>10044037
I can usually tell just by lace length, but just look at the entire jsk. Replica tells present here are:
The print is washed out.
The bow is wrong and sad.
The lace is too long.

>> No.10044185
File: 348 KB, 818x1477, wtf ebay.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10044185

>> No.10044341

>>10044051
Ooo I see it now. So obvious when you point it out.

>> No.10044526

>>10042231

But is he actually a sissy? I don't see anything wrong with the coord itself when I cover his face.

>> No.10044603
File: 422 KB, 750x751, 3A8ECECE-C491-4F47-925F-986277E27728.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10044603

>> No.10044724

>>10044526
>I don't see anything wrong with the coord itself
Sorry, you must be blind. Let me help you: frumpy replica, 10000 shades of pink, a beard. This coord might look passable when you scroll over it real quick, but take a second and look at all the mismatched shit going on.

>> No.10045250

>>10044603
Oof, that damaged hair...

>> No.10047835 [DELETED] 
File: 120 KB, 1140x685, Vomiting-in-a-child-1140x685.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10047835

Why don't fat girls just lose weight? I don't get it. You are willing to spend hours on makeup, hundreds if not thousands of dollars on clothes and shoes etc., but you can't just put the fork down and go up like 6 points?
Just stop eating. It's so fucking easy. Stop eating. Just, like, don't fucking eat. You don't even need to exercise or buy organic salads or anything, just...stop...eating.