[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 248 KB, 750x930, CDA343EE-6FBE-455F-9A33-9396F468A288.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10157093 No.10157093 [Reply] [Original]

Essentially what the subject says. Why is it “cringe” now to be tastefully “edgy” in lolita or imitate old GLB? Is cgl just full of roleplayers who’ve never seen a GLB? Are they just trolls? Are they modernfags roleplaying oldfags? Do they just have no taste? Do they not know the history of lolita? Are they just sixteen year olds finding cgl after mommy buys them their first AP piece? Are they just prudes? I really don’t understand.
Discuss.

>inb4 bait
you’re probably too stupid to have a normal and logical discussion about the shift in an entire culture’s attitude if you think this is b8

>> No.10157095

Cgl is full of borderline normies and special snowflake classic elitists who hate everything that's not elegant.

>> No.10157096

>>10157093
It was always controversial to do so. Sorry that you believe that magazines are the same as real life.

>> No.10157103

>>10157096
k newfag

>> No.10157115

>>10157095
correct

>> No.10157120

who the fuck cares
if you want to have sex in burando go the fuck ahead

do you really care this much about what other people think

>> No.10157121

Because it's an act, and it looks bad. If they did it for art's sake would be different than doing it because old school is popular and it looks cooler than their bedroom pics

>> No.10157122

>>10157093
>tastefully “edgy”
This term is never used for the tasteful way.

>> No.10157128

>>10157093
>it's not bait
>continues with "everyone who disagrees with me is.." - the post

>> No.10157130

There's a difference of being edgy in an avante garde way and pushing the edge of convention and just going out of your way to be different for the sake of attention and looking "cool".

>> No.10157131

>>10157093
Because all of the current notable edgy lolitas got into lolita within the past 1-4 years. THEY are the ones roleplaying oldfags

>> No.10157134

i only judge if theyre fat and gross. if theyre taking makeup background and coord trends from old street snaps and glbs they should copy everything else and lose some weight lmfao

>> No.10157135

>>10157093
I only judge if they look bad doing it. If it’s a pretty thin girl it’s fine. But I use this same mentality towards judging other coords too.

>> No.10157136

>>10157130
Adding on to this- just because it is edgy in the good way, doesn't mean it's going to go over well. Most things that are avante garde or counter culture end up falling flat or just end u never taking off. Which is someone is familiar with that sort of thing, should expect and not get super defensive about it.
It's experimental and not guaranteed to work

>> No.10157176

It's really not a bad thing to be edgy or rebellious with lolita. The reason it's ill-received by gulls and the like is that the people who pursue this actively--and I reiterate, the PEOPLE themselves--aren't very likeable, and don't bring much new to the table.

It would be different if the people who were doing it were, frankly, less annoying. Their rebellion feels vapid and pushed, not to mention poorly executed.

>> No.10157178 [DELETED] 

>>10157135
>>10157134
>>10157131
Leave lolita, pizza faces

>> No.10157179

>>10157128
kek don’t get your feefees too hurt classicfag

>> No.10157182

>>10157120
No I just want to know why gulls are so retarded and act like lolita wasn’t created to be an edgy fashion

>> No.10157183 [DELETED] 

>>10157178
That’s some heavy projection friend

>> No.10157184 [DELETED] 

>>10157183
Not particularly, pizza face. Acne it for yts.

>> No.10157186

>>10157176
but do gulls think they aren’t fucking annoying, cringy, and don’t bring anything new to the table?

>> No.10157187 [DELETED] 

>>10157184
>unironically being this autistic

Projection confirmed

>> No.10157189 [DELETED] 

>>10157187
Just wash your fucking face anon it’s not that hard

>> No.10157191 [DELETED] 

>>10157134
>t. ihop-chan

>> No.10157192 [DELETED] 

>>10157189
>mfw my skin has been clean and I didn’t ever struggle with acne as a teen but some autist is projecting their skin issues mega hard

Honestly I just feel bad for you.

>> No.10157194

>>10157186
Remember what I said? The people themselves are "cringy." It just rubs off on their actions within the fashion.

But in any case, truly rebellious peoole shouldn't really care what other people think of them. Why don't you just do your thing, OP?

>> No.10157195 [DELETED] 

>>10157178
nice projection, my skin is flawless. lose some weight and quit pretending to be an oldfag and people will stop making fun of you

>> No.10157197 [DELETED] 

>>10157192
you’re getting super asshurt though? that’s pathetic. Getting so offended you have to go on a rant about how your skin is ~perfect desu~, then I’m not gonna believe you at all. Not sure why you’d feel sorry for me. I’m not the one with painful face cysts.

>> No.10157200 [DELETED] 

>>10157197
I’m not, again that’s some pretty heavy projection. And idk how you think one sentance is a rant kek. Is reading and writing hard for you so you think a sentance is a rant?

>> No.10157202 [DELETED] 

>>10157195
fat roleplayer or wannaorexic

>> No.10157203 [DELETED] 

>>10157192
it’s just projection. lots of the notorious edgy lolitas have shitty acne. no doubt they’re defending themselves in this thread

>> No.10157204 [DELETED] 

>>10157200
You’re getting really mad about being accused of having acne... to not have acne. Hmm.

>> No.10157206 [DELETED] 

>>10157203
I’ve never seen a good old schooler (or Lolita in general) with acne. Try harder.

>> No.10157207 [DELETED] 

>>10157202
i’m neither. lose some weight. your pictures showing off your gross body are already plastered all over cgl

>>10157206
i said nothing about old school. just edgy lolitas. projecting?

>> No.10157208 [DELETED] 

>>10157189
>>10157192
>tfw you still have acne at 29 years old because of genetics

>> No.10157210

>>10157194
I’m not particularly fond of old school anymore, I’m actually leaning more towards a full otome wardrobe. I’m just confused as to why these people don’t think their behavior is cringe just because they’re anonymous. Also confused about people being befuddled by GLB shots and articles like newbie morons.

>> No.10157211 [DELETED] 

>>10157204
You’re way too sensitive if you think this is “getting mad” kek.

>>10157203
Sounds about right.

>> No.10157212

>>10157207
you sound like you sell stretched out brand as nwot

>> No.10157213 [DELETED] 

>>10157211
quit replying to yourself

>> No.10157214
File: 64 KB, 737x561, C9tKvvFVYAALLcH.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10157214

Reading you bitches fighting and anonymously trying to prove how perfect you are is hilarious. Why does this happen in every thread? Just post photo proofs with timestamps already.

>> No.10157216 [DELETED] 

Why are edgylitas so pressed about getting hate on by cgl? If you want your assholes licked clean, you can always go to fb or instagram.

This just reeks of garbage-chan’s autism

>> No.10157217

>>10157214
gulls can’t handle a normal conversation because they’re all retarded, autistic, or both

>> No.10157218

>>10157212
i don’t because i’m thin and keep all the pieces i purchase because i’m not a trend hopper

>> No.10157220 [DELETED] 

>>10157216
That white girl with glasses cgl hates?

>> No.10157221 [DELETED] 
File: 85 KB, 960x942, 1524847071280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10157221

>>10157093
>anyone who disagrees with me is....
>a troll
>roleplaying as an oldfag
>a child
>a prude
>>10157103
>a newfag
>>10157182
>retarded
>>10157178
>has bad acne
>>10157179
>only likes classic

this entire thread is bait or the OP is genuinely insecure and autistic. Many such cases. Sad.

>> No.10157223

>>10157131
honestly, this

>> No.10157224

I think some people like it, some don't. It's fine.
That said I am confused why people are upset when people have sex in Lolita. Do they not have sex in clothes? Like I get that most of the time you take the clothes off as you go but do they not realize that that has to happen in any clothes you wear? If I'm someone who wears Lolita most of the time and I'm sexually active doesn't it only makes sense that eventually I'll have sex while wearing Lolita? At the very least leading up to it be wearing it?

>> No.10157225 [DELETED] 

>>10157213
You’re insane. In fact, people like you are why I come here. It’s against the rules of mental institutions to go and watch the people committed and laugh at them, but you can do it no problem on /cgl/.

>> No.10157227

I agree that too many people rely on what they perceive to be "historical" influences without acknowledging that lolita is and always has been an alternative fashion. It's fine to have more conservative tastes, but there are some people on this board who can't seem to handle even the slightest deviation from the norm, and they make having conversations a chore.

>> No.10157228
File: 81 KB, 533x291, 9F9C5F53-C3B0-496E-9746-10E052236675.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10157228

>>10157218

>> No.10157229 [DELETED] 

>>10157216
I think it’s her ugly orbiters instead of her but I could be wrong

>> No.10157230

>>10157214
It's mostly one samefag aka op who is massively butthurt about cgl and has shit up the board for days if not weeks.

>> No.10157232 [DELETED] 
File: 126 KB, 717x778, 450E5259-D53D-43AD-AA52-880DB9C5940B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10157232

>>10157221
good try

>> No.10157234

this is a really stupid thread, and i say this as someone who's been around for many years. if you have to try this hard to be edgy, then its exactly that: tryhard. it comes off as really arrogant for no reason, most of you werent even around when this was the popular thing to do, it all seems like larping as oldfags to actual oldfags and you look stupid.
im not sure why this board seems to be going down in quality so badly this week, but wow. please just stay out of old school and lolita if youre going to be this autistic about something you werent even around to appreciate. you sound like a trust fund art school drop out, fuck off.

>> No.10157235

>>10157230
Once again, good try, but >>10157232

>> No.10157236

>>10157234
I’m almost thirty you absolute retard

>> No.10157238 [DELETED] 

>>10157236
But all the popular edgylitas like garbage chan and toddler telekinesis are 20. You’re a nobody

>> No.10157239

>>10157236
then you have no excuse to be acting this juvenile

>> No.10157240

>>10157235
One different reply that wasn't even about op's cgl butthurt. I don't know why you felt the need to screencap that lol.

>> No.10157241 [DELETED] 

>>10157238
Obviously I’m a no one, I don’t have media...?

>> No.10157242

>>10157239
What’s your excuse, then?

>> No.10157243 [DELETED] 

>>10157241
Then what does it matter what gulls think? If nobody is shitting on you then it shouldn’t bother you

>> No.10157244

>>10157242
that doesnt even make any sense, sorry i struck a nerve.

>> No.10157245

>>10157240
you implied all of those were op you walnut and she’s saying they weren’t

>> No.10157247

>>10157243
It just bothers me that newfags forget where they come from and act like Japanese oldschoolers weren’t edgy weirdos

>> No.10157249 [DELETED] 

>>10157240
yikes are they really that young? they look kind of haggard

>> No.10157250 [DELETED] 

>>10157245
No i didn't. I said op has for some reason beef with cgl and has shitposted all over the board for quite a while because of it.

>> No.10157251 [DELETED] 

>>10157238
Pretty sure TC is like 26

>> No.10157253 [DELETED] 

>>10157232
>1/5 posts aren't posted by the same person
>therefore the entire post is proven wrong
Pretty pathetic deflection there.

>> No.10157255

>>10157249
Being an edgy attention whore really does age a person, huh?

>> No.10157256

>>10157250
actually this is the first post I’ve made to cgl in years, I just like lurking for the sweet sweet dramu.
Sorry to inform you, but I’m not your shitposter and if I was I would just admit it at this point. I’m anonymous. No reason to lie, what’s the point?

>> No.10157257 [DELETED] 

>>10157255
toddler chan has an egg head too. Her haircut and highlighting makes it look so much worse. If she’s in her 20s, her makeup has aged her terribly.

>> No.10157258

>>10157253
anon literally what?
I’m just saying you were proven wrong or whatever, just that op isn’t the only one who thinks that, please pull your bloomers out of your vagina and take a moment to breathe.

>> No.10157259 [DELETED] 

>>10157197
I'm not even the anon you replied to but do you even understand that just because you are getting (you)'s doesn't mean people are assblasted.

>> No.10157260

>>10157236
>>10157247
But, hm.. if you’re almost 30, say 28, and you started wearing lolita at age 16, that would still only be in 2007. Isn’t that at the edge of old school?

>> No.10157261
File: 42 KB, 475x355, 1555731095207.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10157261

>>10157256
Well that certainly is not the only thing you're here for.

>> No.10157265 [DELETED] 

>>10157249
trash-chan is older than 20 but yes she's haggard as hell

>> No.10157266

>>10157230
Nope. You are completely wrong. I'm not OP and I completely agree with their sentiment that a lot of the lolita side of the board seems to not only be full of shit but also completely uninformed on several lolita topics.

>> No.10157268 [DELETED] 

>>10157258
You're right, I was. Clearly there are 2 insecure and autistic people in this thread. OP and you.

>> No.10157276 [DELETED] 

>>10157216
Its poodle chan

>> No.10157277 [DELETED] 
File: 727 KB, 1017x1438, 20190425_152545.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10157277

>>10157276
She wants to wear garbage-chan's skin.

>> No.10157278 [DELETED] 

>>10157276
Makes sense, she's a fat ugly newfag. of course she'd project

>> No.10157279 [DELETED] 

>>10157276
Not poodle chan either, retard. I’m not an old schooler anymore.

>> No.10157282 [DELETED] 

>>10157279
If you don't even wear lolita why the fuck are you here? You're just as bad as rpers

>> No.10157284

>>10157282
Please learn to read retard, I wear otome now

>> No.10157285 [DELETED] 

>>10157284
But the thread is about lolita? Ca nyou not read the words you type?

>> No.10157289 [DELETED] 

>>10157236
imagine being 30 years old but still shitting on teens and calling people retards on a chinese cartoon board in your spare time. sad!

>> No.10157292 [DELETED] 

>>10157289
>teens
This board is 18+, newfag. you type like donald trump tweets kek

>> No.10157294 [DELETED] 

>>10157289
Most people on this board are around 23-27

>> No.10157296 [DELETED] 

>>10157292
>18 doesn't end with "teen" anymore
>totally didn't mention teenagers in OP
imagine being 30 years old and being this dense

>> No.10157300 [DELETED] 

>>10157289
> Sad!
are you a fucking boomer

>> No.10157302 [DELETED] 

>>10157296
That’s not what it means and you know it, sorry you’re an idiot that needs everything spoonfed or spelled out for them. Now THAT’S autistic.

>> No.10157304 [DELETED] 

>>10157289
imagine thinking anyone with a brain types like this. crossboarder?

>> No.10157312 [DELETED] 

>>10157300
>>10157302
>>10157304
>implying i sound more autistic than the 30 year old calling people retards every other post
sad! why are women so stupid?

>> No.10157315

>>10157093
Because Lolita’s grew up and angsty teen shit in any fashion is embarrassing. You don’t have to be a newfag to think so, you just need to be an adult

>> No.10157323
File: 727 KB, 1017x1438, 20190425_152545.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10157323

>> No.10157325 [DELETED] 
File: 760 KB, 906x1696, 20190425_153956.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10157325

>>10157323
Her first coord in 2018 kek. Why bother with ~urbex~ when you can live in this filthy waste!

>> No.10157338

Because gulls nitpick everything. Old school is currently in Vogue so gotta nitpick and vendetta post that group of girls. Also kek at all this anons larping as oldfags.

>> No.10157341

>>10157325
well, at least she improved

>> No.10157357

>>10157224
Because sex is fucking gross

>> No.10157362
File: 87 KB, 595x899, 1500047846228.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10157362

well someone got their bloomers in a bunch and reported a bunch of posts. I guess someone had their feefee's hurt.

On topic, those were styles done for magazine editorials. There is a huge difference between how a designer portrays their fashion in a magazine and how that fashion translates into real life usage. I think people saying "it was in a magazine" are just looking for an excuse to be thotty.

>> No.10157366
File: 31 KB, 500x500, FB_IMG_1556226924525.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10157366

>>10157093
Moon Kana! What happened to her? I miss her so much

>> No.10157367

While I think that example in the OP was a bit of an overkill, I noticed that lolita becomes less and less edgy. For an alternative fashion, a lot of people sure care a lot about not being seen as embarassing, even if the criteria for it are arbitrary.

>> No.10157371

I'll try to take this seriously even though this thread is doomed to be shit.

I like old school. I don't mind edgy or street snappy. I don't mind awkware off brand finds like grandma's bag accessories and bad lace socks. I don't mind the photoshopped background trend.

I don't like intentionally blurry photos posted to cof where I can't even see the clothes, cut off body parts, "creepy" poses, trash backgrounds, etc. Save that for your personal blog. If you post a gross looking photo with garbage in it, you're disrespecting your audience and wasting my time. It's not art. Anyone can make lolita look bad.

No one can pull off what Moon Kana did. It's like the singing Whitney in karaoke of lolita, you will never approach the original.

In social media now when every post people make seems like staged bullshit, we are all seeking authenticity in what we see in images. It seems like edgy lolitas are more motivated by the images they can create rather than real love for the clothes. You can tell when someone really loves the clothing in lolita, they will tell a long story about how they found it or show detail pics of their favorite aspects. I don't see that in the edge-chans so their images feel empty.

>> No.10157376
File: 93 KB, 486x700, 1547505680060.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10157376

>>10157371
>No one can pull off what Moon Kana did. It's like the singing Whitney in karaoke of lolita, you will never approach the original.
Fucking truth

>> No.10157380

>>10157371
Projecting

>> No.10157385

>>10157325
>Posting two irrelevant, outdated pics
Great contribution, your ass reeks of vendetta

>> No.10157388

>>10157380
That makes no sense unless you're implying they also make creepy poses and take pics in front of trash backgrounds. I don't think you understand what "projecting" means.

>> No.10157389

>>10157385
are you blind? look at those backgrounds and read her caption, she's trying to be edgy. and how is 2018 outdated?

>> No.10157391

>>10157325
I really like her set up.

>> No.10157394

>>10157357
You're on a site that caters to porn and snuff videos. If you really feel this way why are you on this site.

>> No.10157395

>>10157389
She's improved a lot im my opinion and it's been a couple of months so yeah, I think it's outdated. And it's irrelevant because it doesn't bring anything new to the thread, OP didn't ask you to post old ass pics of edgy lolitas

>> No.10157396
File: 42 KB, 675x482, bait3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10157396

>>10157394
Found the crossboarder. Don't engage

>> No.10157398

>>10157395
her new one in the shitty bathroom is still an embarrassing edgelord pic and shows how fucking disgusting her house is. she lives like a pig and she's so shameless about it that she posts it publicly.

>> No.10157399

>>10157395
kek, you're right they should just post it to the ita thread

>> No.10157402

>>10157398
>new one in the bathroom
The one you posted? The one from sep. 8 fucking 2018?
And okay, I get what you're saying. I don't agree with you but I get it. Now, how does that contribute to the thread?

>> No.10157403

>>10157402
I didn't post it you retard. and it contributes because it's some idiot trying to look edgy and failing and making herself look like garbage. Sorry you got posted.

>> No.10157405

>>10157403
>Why Does CGL Hate Edge Despite Lolita Being Based in Edge
Again, how does posting an old pic of an edgy lolita contribute to this thread? You were clearly just looking for an opportunity to post her, lmfao. And you couldn't even be bothered to find a recent pic. Oh wait, that's because her recent pics don't even look like this.

>Sorry you got posted.
I'm not even defending her, I'm just saying you're shitting up the thread for no reason.

>> No.10157410

>>10157405
Her recent photos are actually way worse

>> No.10157411

>>10157396
I got into lolita through this board after being a visitor to other boards. I don't appreciate moralfags larping here for a reason. You're either a hippocrate or you're trolling.

>> No.10157413

>>10157411
Nah there’s a huge invasion from tumblr/FB recently. You can spot them by their misusage/overusage of the word “vendetta” and getting upset when people use “bad words” like cunt. Another way to tell it’s one of them is when they accuse everyone of being the same poster.

>> No.10157414

>>10157410
post them

>>10157405
again, didn't post her and don't know who she is, but her attempts to be edgy are literally the definition of why we hate newfags like her who want to be edgy. I don't care if her "new pics don't look like this", it's a textbook description of some walking embarrassment trying to look edgy. I agree with the other anon, she belongs in the ita thread too.

>> No.10157417

>>10157413
It's really common for trolls on this board to resort to meme spewing when they get called out. That includes the usual "vendetta" post. It's as over used as "sorry you got posted"

>> No.10157421

>>10157414
If she seriously lives in an environment like that then I honestly don't think she's just "trying to be edgy" desu

>> No.10157433

>>10157421
she's captioning about it to seem cool, seems pretty edgy to me

>> No.10157437

>>10157366
She's still making strange music

>> No.10157442

>>10157323
friends don't post friends to cgl you're a piece of shit for posting private photos from her private page

>> No.10157446

>>10157433
I think she might just be trying to cope with a bad environment that way? She does seem troubled so I think it's possible. Anyways, her new pics are nice imo and I like the kinda edgy settings she posts now. But that's just like my opinion

>> No.10157447

>>10157421
Her captions almost always include the word edgy. Go look before you post. Do some research ffs.

>> No.10157450

>>10157447
You didn't understand what I meant at all, but that's okay. I think we already know enough about you given that you're an expert in the things she says in the captions of ALL her pics

>> No.10157461

>>10157380
do you even know what projecting means
>>10157371
cool, thanks. That’s literally what I wanted was a sensible reply from a normal human. I guess there’s a couple on cgl.

>> No.10157465
File: 270 KB, 639x679, 8B38B249-4681-479B-917B-59D97540283C.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10157465

>>10157398

>> No.10157468

>>10157371
This. I'm all for being edgy but copying old GLB is not edgy, it's """edgy""". And it is fucking embarrassing.

>> No.10157471

>>10157468
>>10157371
nobody cares. cgl is becoming irrelevant. this audience doesn’t deserve respect.

>> No.10157475

>>10157442
Being Facebook friends doesn't mean much lol

>> No.10157477

>>10157471
>cgl is a single entity
I don't even come to cgl or post often but I still think tryhard new oldschoolers are embarrassing.

>> No.10157480

>>10157471
Then fuck off and stop shitting up the board.

>> No.10157484

>>10157471
>cgl is becoming irrelevant

That’s not true at all, this place is becoming more and more relevant especially with content creators like scarfingscarves featuring drama from here to their audiences

>> No.10157486

>>10157421
>an environment like that
She has every power to clean it up, lol. It's just her being a slob, it's common in the ita threads too. Slobs aren't edgy, they're gross.

>> No.10157487

>>10157480
Fuck you, this thread is shitting up the board. This thread probably violates several board rules just by existing.

>> No.10157489

>>10157484
scarfingscarves is irrelevant lol

>> No.10157492

>>10157489
What is relevant to you?

>> No.10157495

>>10157489
this

>> No.10157497

>>10157492
not you

>> No.10157500

>>10157489
Do you not know what irrelevant means? She has one of the largest lolita YouTube channels, is a guest at cons lately, etc. I don’t like her, but she’s certainly not irrelevant.

>> No.10157523

>>10157437
Last thing I can find from her is 2015 though?

>> No.10157525

>>10157093
Can this thread END please.

>> No.10157528

>>10157465
Clean your house and stop whining that people on cgl find you (sorry, “your friend”) disgusting

>> No.10157530

>>10157525
agreed

>> No.10157535

is this entire thread just the garbage woman samefagging

>> No.10157538

>>10157535
Yes

>> No.10157542

>>10157535
no it's literally a vendetta thread and jannies need to come clean this mess up like they're supposed to

>> No.10157548

>>10157542
>misusing the word vendetta

Stop

>> No.10157607

>>10157542
Oh they've been working hard all right
>>/cgl/thread/S10157093#p10157093

>> No.10157611

>>10157442
Isnt this on her IG too though?

>> No.10157647

>>10157542
so.....yes?

>> No.10157648

>>10157542
>maybe if i scream vendetta hard enough the jannies will delete the picture of me

>> No.10157649

>>10157647
Yes

>> No.10157670

>>10157500
I think they were personally ignoring her. Its like when someone jokes about a sequel not existing in a series because they don't like it. They're being facetious.

>> No.10157679

>>10157371
you're a goddess thank you

>> No.10157775

>>10157607
Lol they deleted completely randomly including posts that didn't break any rule. Bravo.

>> No.10157781

>>10157471
Screaming this over and over again everytime someone posts something you don't like doesn't make it true. I fucking wish we were irrelevant so we wouldn't have to deal with what >>10157413 mentioned.

>> No.10157864

>>10157781
They were being facetious. Do you not understand that.

>> No.10157867

>>10157224
This. I hooked up in gothic many times before I realised that hooking up wasn't personally good for me. Oh, those days.

>> No.10157888

Easy answer from an old fag: rich butt bleached, newfags

>> No.10157969

>>10157095
pretty sure being obsessed with elegance is not normie attitude in the slightest

>> No.10157972

>>10157864
I’m the post they quoted and no, I was not being facetious. There is obviously a bunch of newfags from somewhere overly sensitive like tumblr or FB invading this board. Stop projecting your perceptions onto what other people say.

>> No.10158160

>>10157972
They quoted two posts however. So are you both or just the one about tumblr/fb??

>> No.10158163

>>10158160
Basic reading comprehension would answer your question, but since I feel bad for stupid people I’ll spoon feed you. I’m the person who was talking about tumblr and fb.

>> No.10158164

>>10158160
Don't be dense.
>??
And get out.

>> No.10158265

>>10158163
Wow... anyway. I wasn't talking about that post being facetious. I agree that there are definitely people from fb and tumblr and amino and ig coming here. That's a give. Really. And yes they're probably normies who don't get how to use board culture with out over doing it.

>> No.10158370

>>10157224
Because talking about how you have sex in something that tends to either both be really expensive or resold is gross and attention whore-esqe. It also brings a weird energy about bragging about getting off to wearing lolita while having sex. Nobody wants to fucking hear about it.

>> No.10158376

>>10158160
retard

>> No.10158462

>>10157095
This

>> No.10158514

>>10158376
Did you even read the replies or did you just want to sling insults?

>> No.10158687
File: 57 KB, 480x376, ABE686A4-DAFD-46D6-8CEB-BDFDF01CEDAA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10158687

>>10157095
Fpbp
Sweets get gassed

>> No.10158755

>>10158687
Do you really think this place is some secret club for elite lolitas

>> No.10159193

>>10157260
Didn't lolita fashion get more popular in the west later therefore trends that existed in the 00' in japan became populare a lot later in the west?

>> No.10159200

>>10158755
no but it's usually people who don't know anything about the substyle that are the most offended by it.

>> No.10159258

>>10157093
Lolita started out as this underground thing with ties to gothic fashion/music and visual kei. Then, as time passed, more "normie" girls started getting into it, partly through anime subculture.
It kept the classic beauty/grace/elegance sensibilities, but the darker aspects disappeared because of said demographic change.
Now instead of gothic girls who might also like anime and want to be cute/princess-y, now it's girls who like anime and want to be cute/princess-y, no need for anything to do with gothic subculture whatsoever.

>> No.10159278

>>10157371
This is it, right here.

>> No.10159331 [DELETED] 

>>10159278
I agree with >>10159258 more

>> No.10159335

>>10159258
The aesthetic of the fashion existed before that, though. There was a huge Victorian craze in the 70's thanks to Anne of Green Gables being on air.
That aesthetic really meshed with Japan and it always sort of existed.
Mana just gave the term, EGL. He didn't invent the fashion.

>> No.10159351

>>10159335
>implying anon said mana started it
oof honey

>> No.10160818

>>10159335
I'm pretty sure they didn't say anything remotely close to 'Mana invented the fashion'.

>> No.10160821

>>10159351
>>10160818
Nayrt, anon didn't say that Mana started the fashion but they did say that the fashion started with ties to goth, which isn't necessarily true. Lolita started off girly, with AP (or just Pretty), Baby, Pink House, Milk, and other girly style brands pioneering it. Influences from and ties to VK came in later.