[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 98 KB, 1080x1080, 65395904_358651471484953_6764791009078338108_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225502 No.10225502 [Reply] [Original]

Post hideous coords.

>> No.10225505
File: 244 KB, 1080x1350, 59950275_2309676042640142_4392845731387700828_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225505

>>10225502

>> No.10225506
File: 26 KB, 300x300, s_5d2e1ff27a8173e31c3fbfb8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225506

>>10225505

>> No.10225511
File: 43 B, 1x1, spaceout.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225511

>>10225506

>> No.10225514 [DELETED] 

>>10225505

Oof. Fattychans, don't wear prints of fast food when your over 300 lbs. It's just so silly.

>> No.10225515
File: 334 KB, 682x1023, 14379055177_83ec098d8a_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225515

>>10225506

>> No.10225516
File: 110 KB, 1080x1080, 67382392_950687061947453_6941262783161152268_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225516

>>10225515

>> No.10225517

>>10225515
Is this a recent photo? If so it’s unbelievable that she hasn’t changed at all over the years.

>> No.10225522
File: 240 KB, 682x1023, 32869385047_610e5ebe28_b.jpg(.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225522

>>10225516
This one is from the last couple months.

>> No.10225525

>>10225522
Perma-ita status.

>> No.10225583

>>10225505
>>10225514
The sad thing is that her fatness isn't even the biggest issue here.

>> No.10225587

>>10225502
I literally can't tell if this is a man or woman.

>> No.10225588

>>10225514
Even on skinny girls, most fast food prints don't work unless they're heavily sweet-themed like Diner Doll.

>> No.10225597

>>10225522
I can’t believe after all these years she still looks like this...

>> No.10225609
File: 304 KB, 742x1191, 65E1DCD2-CFE8-4731-8224-DCA916027549.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225609

This is so bad that I thought it was a troll post.

>> No.10225611
File: 225 KB, 754x1035, B5031EA0-B045-4B9D-9969-B0FFB446A5F3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225611

>> No.10225612

>>10225609
This doesn’t belong here. She’s not even finished making it and she’s asking for help to make it lolita.

>> No.10225615
File: 69 KB, 720x720, 67264974_344769696469460_3887348919054786715_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225615

Even with Rin Rin's help, Safiya's final outfit in her youtube video looks... pretty bad. Her other coords were all pretty cute. I feel like Rin Rin wanted to do her "soft neo lolita" look for the hair and makeup, but that just doesn't go with the voluminous outfit. This outfit really needs a headpiece and bangs.

>> No.10225618

>>10225611

She was in the fashion show....ugh. Models want to make you BUY the outfit. Like you want to look at cool or sleek or stylish as them. Not this. I don't want to see this just to be all inclusive. I know half of us will by from plus size brands so they can feel welcome and I'm part of the half that boycott those business. Maybe that's the uber bitch side of me, but my lizard brain can't think otherwise.

>> No.10225619

>>10225615

I dunno. 2 "professional" stylists did her up, Rin Rin and the worker at the store. If you think the end result looks bad, that's literally just your opinion.

She even said her hair would look cool with the stright bangs and two longer stripes to frame her face, but she wasn't going to commit getting a haircut for one photo.

I DO agree a headpiece would have been cool to put on top of her corseted hair, but the look still looks nice.

>> No.10225622

>>10225618
You do realize that lolita fashion shows are as much about making the models feel special to stan for their brand and causing them to buy more, right? They don’t always pick the models for any other reason. These aren’t in any way like regular fashion shows. And yes I’ve done both so I can tell you honestly that there’s a really big difference. The lolita modeling bar is extremely low for most events. I will still do it because what can I say, I do stan for my brands. Plus it’s pretty fun and low pressure. But the girls who take it seriously as Modeling are deluded.

>> No.10225623

>>10225615
The hair corset ribbons are the head decoration and her hair was elaborate enough. Cgl just has a hate boner for this type of no bangs, corset wearing, no skirt print and more unusual type of coord. But it’s definitely a thing and I’m there for it. No pastels, no babyish things, limited and elegant frills, nothing extreme or ridiculous going on up top on your head. Sign me up.

>> No.10225624

>>10225622

Oh really? You would think indie brands would rather NOT be known for catering to landwhales when they must know how much the skinny lolies hate them. Why the low standards? It's such a posh and expensive hobby. You think it's the fear of being called out?

>> No.10225625

>>10225609
Why do people think they should immediately try to sell things they are just barely learning to make? I think that’s why she’s being posted.
It’s obvious she’s no skilled pattern maker and can’t drape. Someone needs to let her examine and measure the proportions on some actual lolita dresses because all of hers are way off. Walk before you run. JFC.

>> No.10225628

>>10225625
Oh boy, you’re right. I just found her etsy :(

>> No.10225634
File: 81 KB, 540x960, 2EC239F0-C16E-45F7-A331-AB14CCA62993.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225634

>>10225609
Gotta agree that it’s not really kosher to post this since she’s asking for help. But this pic is fair game

>> No.10225644
File: 29 KB, 360x219, 1552973075976.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225644

>>10225502
THIS ISNT COSPLAY YOU KEKOLD

>> No.10225645

>>10225612
I strongly suspect she’ll never make anything even remotely good. Lolita or otherwise.

>> No.10225647

>>10225619
Rin Rin’s not a surgeon, there wasn’t much she could do.

>> No.10225648

>>10225644
Literally what is this post?

>> No.10225650

>>10225624
‘Inclusive sizing’ and a token fat model is the current asspat-earning flavor of the day. Indie brands are easily shit-talked for non-inclusive sizing if they only make for normal weight people these days. So some smaller brands are on the bandwagon for the fatty bux. Haenuli is closing after one final round of fleecing her whales (to bend a metaphor badly) so where they gonna get their huge dresses from now? Lots of indie brands still charge a fat tax for sizes over a certain measure and people also cry about that so fatty dress availability is limited. Skinny girls can wear burando and lots of things made for Asian sizing only, fatties are more limited. Some brands will take the gamble.

>> No.10225653

>>10225650

I meant more like, why would you want a HUGE fatty, not even just chubby, but like WHOA THERE be in your show? All the fashion brands HAVE XL, sure, but you still see the Ls on the runway, if they really want to seem like they care about the PC peeps.

If I was an indie store, I would HAVE XXXXXXL and let everyone know, but I would only show the dress off on a skinny girl. Then again, what do I know about business in a super nitch thing. Gotta cater to everyone in the US now.

>> No.10225654

>>10225653

And to add on, when I pass the ModCloth shop's windows, my lizard brain see the fat mannequin model with whatever it's wearing and it automatically turns me off. Don't care how cute the top or dress it. I don't want it anymore. Fat girls should see skinny mannequins and what to wear what they are wearing. Not have skinny/normal girls see an overweight body and want that outfit. Am I crazy?

>> No.10225657

>>10225654

Ok, I've spelt like ten words wrong. Bed time. Goodnight /cgl/

>> No.10225660

>>10225502
why do itas always do this pose? they look like 3 year olds.

>> No.10225661
File: 1.01 MB, 938x601, ouf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225661

>> No.10225662

>>10225615
I don't really think safiya looks good in this. I don't think the coord is bad but I feel like it looks bad on safiya? Don't really know how to explain it. Also the lack of poof in the skirt bothers me, but that's a personal thing.

>> No.10225663

>>10225653
>>10225654
You seem to have a deep and disturbing hatred for fat people if you think even fat mannequins shouldn't exist. Fat people want to know if the clothes will look flattering on their type of body, thus why seeing those clothes on a skinny girl is unhelpful.

>> No.10225664

>>10225660
It's a simple traditional curtsey pose and I don't understand why y'all always so mad about it

>> No.10225671
File: 1.89 MB, 1620x2160, GVxVAT4wNGQ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225671

>> No.10225672

>>10225671
Lol did you post this in the wrong thread? I don't see anything ita about this

>> No.10225675

>>10225672
It's a nitpick at most for sure

>> No.10225681

>>10225672
Bc tattoos. Lolitas SHOULDNT have them

>> No.10225682

>>10225681
Wow that's a shit opinion that better be sarcasm

>> No.10225689

>>10225672
What about lack of petticoat

>> No.10225691

>>10225661
Oh honey, this needs more than just different socks and a wig...

>> No.10225692
File: 151 KB, 750x721, C56A5943-51DC-47E3-9539-BF0B6796ECA4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225692

>> No.10225694

>>10225692
Is she going to crawl out of my screen and chase me?

>> No.10225697

>>10225692
Is this reinagoth?

>> No.10225707

>>10225697
Yes, she posted it on her ig

>> No.10225709

>>10225689
Nitpick.

>> No.10225710
File: 60 KB, 600x900, atlantic-cod-caught-on-a-fishing-hook-bjorn-svensson.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225710

>>10225648
>you

>> No.10225711

>>10225664
Sometimes people do it to hide the lack of petti but yeah its like people on this board don't know what curtsying is.

>> No.10225712

>>10225711
It's literally one person.

>> No.10225730
File: 194 KB, 768x1024, TC2pXZnbtU4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225730

>> No.10225732

>>10225615
Goddamn it. I really thought Safiya would be the one to get it right.

>> No.10225745

>>10225522
I actually like this outfit as sort of a throwback to the modcloth era. but if she's still calling this kind of shit lolita she's out of her mind. and please get some conditioner

>> No.10225746

>>10225712
No. God no. That pose is hella common. Are you new?

>> No.10225750

>>10225615
In a weird way I thought she suited the angelic pretty outfits a lot more, particularly the first one.
Also, I think part of the reason why a lot of popular lolitas look good is because they know how to pose, hold themselves, walk, and feel comfortable in the lolita they wear. Safiya looked fairly uncomfortable the whole time and her clogging walk and posing just doesnt fit.

>> No.10225751

>>10225662
iawtc. the coordinate is cool, but it would look better on someone with a smaller chest and more voluminous hair (not even that much more voluminous, just not plastered to her head). The hairstyle is too delicate for the coordinate and for her body type

>> No.10225764
File: 307 KB, 1440x1440, 0DBD7D5C-8F63-4E0E-8540-5FF29D086532.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225764

This is vomit worthy

>> No.10225767
File: 954 KB, 1440x2160, jaLSyPr_Rco.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10225767

>> No.10225780

>>10225764
Definitely too much edge for one look. Pick a gimmick item and take the others off unless wearing a full set but this look is so tryhard. The eyepatch and hat are the worst offenders but the uneven socks and gothic corset with oldschool sweet dress are pretty bad too

>> No.10225781

>>10225767
Cosplay or Amazon primelita?

>> No.10225783

>>10225767
>>10225780
>>10225781

This is a Yohane cosplay

>> No.10225791

>>10225780
I disagree This is fun and eccentric

>> No.10225828

>>10225781
Amazon whoever-you-'ve-said

>> No.10225872

>>10225764
Jealous fatty detected

>> No.10225873

>>10225681
Bait harder faggot

>> No.10225882

>>10225746
Jesus christ anon. Reading comprehension.
I'm saying it's one person complaining.

>> No.10225900

>>10225612
Giving her a lot of credit anon

>> No.10225920

Controversial opinion. I think tattoos can look nice with gothic lolita but let’s be real half the time it looks like shit on sweet and classical lolita. I find it weird that accepting tattoos is the one thing everyone decides to be pc about. It’s not like they have to get tattoos or can’t just fucking cover it.

>> No.10225965

>>10225920
Mentally ill girls ie lolitas do have to get tattoos, anon. They can’t help it.

>> No.10226008

>>10225615
the only ita thing about this is the posing - everything else looks fine. Nitpick at most; I think some clip on bangs/extensions
(maybe headwear like a half-bonnet) would have helped balance that.

I think people are just salty because this woman went out and lived the lolita dream (getting to go to the stores before the mall even opened, getting dressed by the shop owners, having tea at q-pot) and looked more than acceptable

>> No.10226011

>>10225764
I'm glad she referenced living out her 14-year old fantasies because yeah, that is an eyesore haha

>> No.10226026

>>10225920
I agree that tattoos don’t look good with lolita but most people only wear lolita on occasion. It’s not really practical to expect people to not get tattoos just because they won’t look good with a style they wear a couple times a month. I do think that covering them up is going to look the best but it’s not essential.

>> No.10226027

>>10225965
Lmao true. They can’t help it. It totally wasn’t a choice. Their mental illness told them too.

>> No.10226029

>>10226026
True it’s dumb not to get a tattoo, especially if you’re just a casual lolita. Some consealer wouldn’t hurt though because I’ve seen some UGLY tattoos ruin a sweet coord. If it goes with your outfit though use it! It’s just annoying to see a flaming scull tattoo next to like. An Ap sweet dress.

>> No.10226069

>>10225611
>plus size brand
>can’t even fit without burst at the seams
Fat people ruin this fashion. They aren’t elegant they just look like ageplayers.

>> No.10226072
File: 412 KB, 378x805, Screenshot_20190721-174412.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226072

Tagged as Angelic Pretty, EGL Community and EGL Fashion. This is why "Gate Keeping" is important.

>> No.10226076

>>10225681
>>10225920
>>10225965
>>10226026
>>10226027
>>10226029
This is cancer and you guys are the tumor. Who the fuck are you to police people’s bodies in such a way? Tattoos are a form of expression and I don’t see why it takes away from CLOTHES. Their tattoos don’t have to match the aesthetics of their coord, that’s like saying someone who’s tan shouldn’t wear sweet because their skin isn’t pastel. Go bitch about fat, at least that affects the clothes more than some ink. Oh and pick the sand out your meat curtains

>> No.10226077

>>10226072
Gate keeping is the only thing that prevents what happened to the cosplay community from happening to lolita

>> No.10226079

>>10226069
Most sweet lolitas look like ageplayers.

>> No.10226082

>>10226076
>t. an edgy tattoo lolita that is okay with shitting on other people's weight but cries if someone insults her ugly ink

>> No.10226090
File: 61 KB, 424x800, nanakitade.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226090

>>10225764
i usually really like her looks but wow this is so bad. it's like she's trying to be nana kitade but it fell really, really, really flat

>> No.10226096

>>10225653
It's expensive to carry all the sizes in stock and even expensive to draft and cut multiple sizes of an item. I'd do the opposite, one size with shirring, a range of stretch clearly marked from x to y and say ’I'm a very small brand, I'm marketing to the majority of people within a middle range’. No one ever said you have to cater to everyone in every aspect. This is a highly specialised niche fashion. I'd also only ever do certain colors as a sample or offer it on a pre-order because It's expensive to stock multiple colorways. Same thing. People trying to ’cancel’ brands for non-inclusiveness need to look at the brand concept and realize that catering to everyone is impossible and that its ok to specialize in something we know. I'm a tall lolita with a long waist so that's what my designs would look best on if I had a brand because I know how to best choose styles that flatter my body. I learned about other body types, sure, but I'll always know and like my own style and fit best. And there's nothing wrong with that.

>> No.10226098

>>10226072
okay but she's literally wearing angelic pretty

>> No.10226099

>>10226082
Yeah but like...lolita is clothes is it not? Do you think stretched out bodices are good for the clothes?

>> No.10226101

>>10225515
I like the legwear but not with lolita and not really with this. Sauce?
I don't like her lewks in general but clearly she's got her thing going and likes it fine so whatever floats her boat, I guess. People keep posting her here and she keeps not caring.

>> No.10226104

>>10226099
I'm not saying it's good or bad, I'm just pointing out the moral hypocrisy

>> No.10226107

>>10225681
>SHOULDNT
Oh heaven forfend that people should ever have personalities and not be perfect little unmarked virgin angels. Are you 12?

>> No.10226120

>>10226076
How is racism the same as saying a tattoo looks bad. Are you fucking retarded.

>> No.10226142

>>10226101
Post (from 2014) says it's "Poorman's Gold Label"

>> No.10226146

>>10226142
http://www.strangeartifact.jp/pg121.html
That's the alleged webshop.

>> No.10226147

>>10225515
Imagine never outgrowing your cringy steampunk phase, 10 years later

>> No.10226150

>>10226147
She's stopped wearing so many weird hand-knit things and spats all the time. It's kinda cute how consistently bad she is.

>> No.10226151

>>10225619
>>10225623

It's unbalanced. The bottom is very voluminous, she needs a headpiece to balance it out. Get bent.

That said, it's definitely not ita, just needs a minor tweak, so OP can get bent too.

>> No.10226154

>>10226027
>>10226076
God this board is embarassingly easy to bait. Why is everyone here so fucking stupid?

>> No.10226157

>>10226076
They're baiting anon, you're only giving them the attention they crave.

>> No.10226158

>>10226079
Agree but being fat makes it look twice as much like ageplay.

>> No.10226161

>>10226158
...how? if anything, the flat chested waifs look more like actual little girls.

>> No.10226162 [DELETED] 

>>10225663
Everyone hates fat people. You’re fooling yourself if you think you dont.

>> No.10226180

>>10225764
I get what she was going for but the coord looks too 'deliberate,' if that makes sense. There's something elegantly messy and spontaneous about amekaji in general as a fashion statement, and I'm not getting that with this coord. It's a shame, because this girl is usually spot-on and I'm a fan. I wish I could give her advice, but I'm a stranger, and she's probably not asking for any - but short-hair-oldschool-skinny-girl, if you're on CGL, please don't give up!

>> No.10226182

>>10225692
Melanie Martinez was a mistake.

>> No.10226183

>>10225709
nayrt but lack of petticoat is absolutely not a nitpick. It can't be lolita without the silhouette. Sad deflated or misshapen petti is a nitpick, but no petti at all isn't.

>> No.10226184

>>10226180
Anon didn't include the context. The girl said in her post that she was going for a "GaiaOnline look." It's intentionally messy

>> No.10226185

>>10225882
Honestly, the complaint is common too in previous ita threads.

>> No.10226186

>>10225920
You'd think they'd be easier to cover with most coords since lolita is so modest. I don't have any tattoos but all of the ones I want would be in locations never seen in lolita, except the ankle tattoos might be a little visible under certain tights.

>> No.10226188

>>10226072
This has potential as fairy kei, at least. But not lolita.

>> No.10226190
File: 71 KB, 688x1080, sOaGQryoZ_s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226190

>> No.10226193

>>10226184
Don’t suck her dick too hard, it’s an ita look she tried to cover up with a funny caption. It isn’t meant to be messy, it just is ugly

>> No.10226195

>>10226190
The way this bonnet sits on her head looks like a cone of shame lmao

>> No.10226198

>>10226190
I like this desu, looks like some sort of haute couture editorial.

>> No.10226200

>>10226198
if you consider cheap looking shit to be at all close to haute couture

>> No.10226201

>>10226200
I clearly meant the aesthetic and photography you dingdong

>> No.10226202
File: 220 KB, 960x1280, 60b26c3f-107f-4a12-a801-8536d0d438d7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226202

>> No.10226203

>>10226202
i'm assuming this one is supposed to be a cosplay

>> No.10226210
File: 683 KB, 1080x2312, Screenshot_20190721_215618_com.tumblr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226210

>>10226203
I wish it was

>> No.10226211

>>10226203

They also posted it to CoF.

>> No.10226229

>>10225920
honestly it's impractical and unreasonable to expect people to stop having other hobbies or interests just because it may conflict with lolita.

Yes this is an expensive hobby that consumes our money but it shouldn't consume the entirety of our lives and interests to the point you can't get tattoos, have certain shaped/styled glasses, hair, etc.

It ain't healthy to be that obsessed with a hobby you stop doing all other ones. even lifestyle lolitas ain't that obsessed.

>> No.10226233

>>10225764
it could be cute but there is just too much going on

>> No.10226234

>>10225692
I thought that was Yumi King for a sec
but then I remembered she actually got her life together.

>> No.10226243

>>10226229
You could use consealer. Also I’d never tell someone not to get that tattoo or not wear whatever glasses they need. Or even if they have garbage hair I wouldn’t force someone to wear a wig and call them bad for not wearing one. Even if tattoo’s aren’t inherently ita I’m allowed to think it looks bad. Just seeing a tiger tattoo or some big ass homestuck tattoo coving someone’s arms really ruins a sweet or classic coord for me.

>> No.10226257

>>10226234

Did she though? She got a part time job and she's still catering to Splenda's creepy whims.

5/7 though, you got me to read her lolcow for a bit.

>> No.10226266

>>10226243
I wear mostly gothic and have a significant amount of tattoos, whether people like them or not is none of my business. But expecting people to ‘wear concealer’ is just ridiculous, sure if you’ve just got a little fine line piece covering it up isn’t too difficult, but anything bigger than that is going to take a lot of time, product, and money. Next time you find yourself getting mad about other people’s bodies go and look at a flower or something.

>> No.10226288

>>10225664
>>10225711
>traditional curtsey
>no bent knees or crossing of legs, standing stick straight
>pulling the dress out all the way with locked elbows
lol k

>> No.10226322

>>10226183
I'm saying in this case, with this coord, even the sad petti is still nitpick over full ita.
It can be improved, that's absolute.
Pettis are probably one of the easiest fixes.

>> No.10226326
File: 12 KB, 236x299, alicecurtsey.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226326

>>10226288
you mean exactly like alice does? alice, the lolita icon? i mean yeah wow, so un-lolita!

>> No.10226329

>>10226326
Honey nayrt, but you really shouldn't defend yourself on cgl no matter what the situation is

>> No.10226340

>>10225615
A hat. Someone give her a hat.

>> No.10226341

>>10226326
Alice is also 8 bud. She only figues out how to properly do it after getting schooled by the red queen.

>> No.10226343

>>10226210
Even if she removed the ears and forehead sticker, this is still absolutely not passable as a coord. Cute for a cosplay, but not lolita.

>> No.10226345
File: 158 KB, 720x960, 67256523_10216981486321039_6804679298809593856_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226345

I know it's almost cheating posting lip piercing-chan, but I couldn't get over the fact that she tried to pass this replica off as actual AP in her description.

>> No.10226347
File: 353 KB, 1298x2486, William-Adolphe_Bouguereau_(1825-1905)_-_The_Curtsey_(1898).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226347

>>10226288
omg so ita

>> No.10226349

>>10226341
To be fair, the goal of especially sweet lolita is to look childish. So curtseying like a little girl isn't too egregious of an error.

>> No.10226351

>>10226349
This is debatable, but in the end, it doesn't so much matter what incorrectly used pose is employed, if it's a nice coord it'll be forgiven, if it's not it'll be lampooned.

>> No.10226352

>>10226345
Umm, looks real to me. What am I missing, anon?

>> No.10226356
File: 38 KB, 250x333, 4298458574_00669b5951.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226356

>>10226352
1. That bow on the front isn't a part of the blouse they're wearing underneath, it's part of the dress.
2. Sugary Carnival yet there are no horses.
3. Big-ass blocky trim.
Compare with pic related and the differences are noticeable.

>> No.10226363

>>10226345
>>10226356
It is AP you fucking newfag

https://lolibrary.org/items/ap-sugary-carnival-special-set-0

>> No.10226365
File: 154 KB, 720x1017, The Curtsey.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226365

>>10226347
fucking itas reeee

>> No.10226366
File: 73 KB, 606x807, y_83b88316.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226366

>> No.10226368

>>10226366
cute desu

>> No.10226373

>>10226363
Newfag confirmed but that thing is fucking hideous anyway.

>> No.10226379

>>10226356
Lurk more newfag

>> No.10226381

>>10226345
>>10226352
>>10226363
I'm guilty of also thinking this was a replica, but maybe it looks like shit quality because 1. its on this bitch, and 2. the mirror shot de-saturates it kind of.

I have to admit this is better than some of her other crap she puts on, but damn, does that girl LIVE at Clares? Does she even have a home?

>> No.10226386

>>10226381
She surprisingly has a lot of shots taken outside of Claire's, it's just that the Claire's ones are the ones that always find their way onto this thread. The mint bonnet with the chocolate polka dot salo from a thread or two back was the same girl, but I didn't recognize her because her phone was covering her face and those hideous piercings.

>> No.10226396

>>10225615
Add some volume to hair/big headwear and I think it's pretty ok. In my personal opinion, also ditch the corset + swap the shoes but it works like this too. Tbh I liked it more when she first tried it on, with the butterflies and without the corset.

>> No.10226410
File: 13 KB, 236x300, e505a7ac-a9b0-5677-9ff6-1114345c2199.jpeg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226410

I was looking through lolibrary for an angelic pretty dress and found this...has anyone else seen this??

>> No.10226412

>>10226243
I'd rather have a tattoo near my dress than CONCEALER

>> No.10226414

>>10226352
KEKEEKEKKEEKEKEKEKEK

>> No.10226415

>>10226414
Oh look another newfag

>> No.10226416

>>10225506
Is this a sissy?

>> No.10226417

>>10226373
boneless sugary carnival

>> No.10226422
File: 49 KB, 412x712, IgrdJxzhtz4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226422

>> No.10226429

>>10226412
I know right? One little drop of foundation totally ruined my knitted dress (not lolita) imagine staining a $200 dress just to avoid triggering people with your tattoos kek

>> No.10226431

>>10225764
this would be fucking bomb without the corset belt. that's the only thing that doesn't go because the jsk is so sweet compared to it. everything else is amazing.

>> No.10226454

>>10226410
>doesn't know what Dollbe is
How new are you?

>> No.10226620

>>10226454
BWWAAAAAAAAAAWWWWMMM

>> No.10226668

>>10226431
Agreed

>> No.10226686

>>10226454
NAYRT but I am not a newb and I didn’t know who Dollbe is for the entirety of her time as a brand. I see pix like that and just keep scrolling because her styling, size, everything, it’s is the polar opposite of anything I’m looking for but also, I don’t really look for stuff to shit on either. My brain doesn’t work like that and so yep, oblivious.
She was totally off my radar until people spoke about the brand closing. I don’t hang out in the ita thread that much, it’s a slow week right now, so I had never seen her.

>> No.10226702

>>10225663
>Fat people want to know if the clothes will look flattering on their type of body, thus why seeing those clothes on a skinny girl is unhelpful.


This is accurate. I'm tall and I've put on so many things that look great on a catalog page or a mannequin only to have ALL the proportions be off on my body. Same thing for fat. I'll put on a lovely dress that says its a 16 and fits like an 18 but the brand's idea of sizing up sucks so it looks really wrong on a bigger body in comparison to the skinny mannequin.

So seeing a bigger mannequin helps.

>> No.10226756

>>10226326
>>10226347
>>10226365
>thinking these even resemble the ita's pose
Sorry you guys suck at posing for photos if you all think pulling your dress taut and standing completely upright lmao

>> No.10226766

>>10226702
Fats all gain fat differently which is why custom sizing in the larger ranges is such a thankless task unless you pad out the fit dummy in the exact proportions and pin drape on that. What looks good on a person with normal weight proportions rarely scales up well on someone fat without completely redrafting everything from the waist up in lolita. You can’t just ‘make everything bigger’ because that’s not how fat people gain their weight. They gain lots in certain spots, and gain very little in other places, there are quite a variety of fat body types!

Also, fat models aren’t usually your type of fat specifically so while it may make you feel good to see a bigger girl rock the dress on the runway, or in a magazine, that’s rarely relative to how it will fit you. Mainstream plus models are often chosen for their resemblance to normal proportions, and the majority of people even 20 pounds over normal weight usually start to lose those proportions. Plus size models for the most part are as unrealistic to average fat women as super models are for average normal weight women. Check some published plus size model measurements and compare them to average fat gal’s measurements and you’ll see what I mean. It’s all deceptive marketing bs.

>> No.10226772

>>10226702
16???? Dude, a normal girl is supposed to be 6-10. 14 is even pushing it. You’re huge.

>> No.10226775

>>10226766
Or, you know, stop eating for three people in one sitting? Be normal sized, Jesus.

>> No.10226780

>>10226775
Well that’s a given but most wont listen to it, we know this already. But maybe explaining a bit WHY the ‘but you should be inclusive and make every size’ idea is not realistic in practice, even if we wanted to. Especially for a small brand in a niche fashion. Everything would have to just look like a sack, tied, wrapped and tucked in according to your body, and with lolita being a very shaped silhouette from the waist up, it’s impossible. Look how shitty Haenuli big stuff usually fits. Because she just graded up the patterns.
Most form fitting woven fabric (not stretch) mid-priced department store fashion items in western fashion are much less forgiving in size and also size range. Lolita dresses with shirring already fit a generous middle range. People need to quit their crying.

>> No.10226785

>>10225764
does she have insta

>> No.10226790

>>10226772
14-16 is pretty typical in the US but doesn’t mean obese, which are in the 20 and up sizes.

>> No.10226791

>>10226790
it's definitely overweight af

>> No.10226793

>>10226790
Typical doesn't mean normal weight. Sincerely, a fat ass 12. That way of thinking keeps people fat.

>> No.10226803

>>10226790
I am also a 12, and consider myself fat. I went from 300lbs to 160lbs though and am 5'10", so I honestly don't see myself getting any lower than a 10. still working on it though.,

>> No.10226809

>>10226072
this is fairy kei and a nitpick. Would look better with a big cardigan or sweater but other than that this is nice

>> No.10226813

>>10226098
we've been through this anon, wearing brand doesn't make you a lolita. lil' mama and melanie martinez have worn angelic pretty too, would you call them lolitas?

>> No.10226816

>>10226813
i am not saying that what she's wearing is automatically lolita because it's AP, but rather that the person who posted on her ragged on her for tagging it #angelicpretty when she's literally wearing AP

>> No.10226825
File: 433 KB, 2048x1365, IMG950160.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226825

I hate my state :(

>> No.10226846

>>10226803
160 lbs at 5'10" is normal weight according to the BMI.
Base your weight loss goals on something less skewed, inconsistent and subjective as clothing sizes or you'll become an ana-chan.

>> No.10226847
File: 157 KB, 715x500, Size12.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226847

>>10226790
>>10226803
>>10226793

Good lord. You guys are size 12s and think your thin/skinny/not fat????? This why lolita gets so many fatties.

This is a pic of size 12 dress from Amazon. I used Amazon as a staple size chart since they cater to the whole country and their sizes are pretty standard, vs say, like Forever 21 where their size 4 is actually an Amazon size 6.

The two chubby girls are from a random youtube video I found do a Target shopping haul and show that they both wear the same size 12. I don't know what they're trying to prove. Like that slightly different body shapes can fit into the same latex/spandex/loose cotton dress and pants? Fucking duh.

If you two look the girls in this photo you're NOT skinny and you're NOT average. You are above average. You are chubby. Or in case of Mrs. 14-20 is "average" you're a whale.

>>10226825
Oof. Ouch. What state is this? Please don't say Colorado.

>> No.10226848

>>10226825
What state is this?
The girl sitting on the floor looks passable and I'm actually digging the guy's baby's first ouji coord, but the rest of them...are they even trying?

>> No.10226849

>>10226847
nyart but both of the anons who said they are size 12 also said they're fat, what are you on about.

>> No.10226852

>>10226825
Massachusetts?

>> No.10226855

>>10226849
>consider

That word. They "think" they're fat. It makes it sound like they think they look like size 8s but wear 12 and are ok with being "not rail model thin". It's like the subjects on My 600 Lbs when they talk about what they eat and say "Yeah, I guess eating 12 pizzas in one sitting is bad." or "I know I'm big."

That just makes it sound like they THINK they are smaller.

>> No.10226856

>>10226803
That sounds like a you problem though.... size 12 isn't fat.

>> No.10226857

>>10226847
both of us said we were fat. We may be fat, but we can read.

>> No.10226858

>>10226856

Size 12 IS FAT. See what I mean!?

>> No.10226859

>>10226855
One of the anon's who is a 12 said she was bigger and is still losing... I think you're just being autistic as fuck.

>> No.10226860

>>10226856
You sound morbidly obese anon, I’m a size 10-12 and most certainly fat. Why are burgers this retarded?

>> No.10226861

>>10226847
I knew there was a reason I don't listen to people's views on weight and sizing on here....

Good God, the person in the pics looks like a size 14, not a 12. I wore a 12 and didn't look anything REMOTELY close to that.....

>> No.10226865

>>10226847
Yeah, those girls are delusional and are way fatter than what they say they are. They look more like size 18-20s. The bathing suits look strained.

>> No.10226868

Why does every Ita thread end up being everyone screaming at/ about fat people. Like yeah they can look silly in lolita if they don’t style it in a way that fits their body. I think we all agree on that. Doesn’t need to be a convo. People on here aren’t nutritionists. Just admit you’re not a doctor.

I want to see some shit eBay coords.

>> No.10226871

>>10226868

I'm not a doctor, but fuck you if you think >>10226847 is not fat or only "little overweight".

>> No.10226876

>>10226860
nayrt but sounds like you're the retarded one.
Clothing sizes vary from store to store. Deeming someone fat or skinny because of clothing sizes is literally the most subjective way you could judge someone being fat or skinny.
Hell even Abercrombie and Fitch said up front they don't wanna sell to fat people, but a size 22 can still fit into their clothes. It's not a solid basis to judge whether someone is fat, skinny or average.

>> No.10226878
File: 310 KB, 703x738, BA7E3421-8100-4B62-AD0F-38C504DF8867.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226878

>>10226868
I’m with you. I’m so goddamn sick of every thread getting derailed by this stupid shit.

Here is a coord that is bad.

>> No.10226880

>>10226825
Way too many trannies for comfort.

>> No.10226882

>>10226878
>Here is a coord that is bad.

Kek. Don't know why that made me laugh as hard as I just did.

>> No.10226883

>>10226825
the ouji is adorable tho

>> No.10226884

>>10226859
Good god, all of you are freaking retarded. Whether or not a certain size is fat is totally dependent on the height/frame of the person. A girl 5’1” and a size 12 is very obese, a 5’11” girl in a size 12 may be only chubby. Because when you get taller your skeleton doesn’t just get longer, duh. Your pelvis and shoulders are also wider. Jesus, guys. Stop being stupid and thinking size as a number matters. BMI is a bit more accurate, but even then people at the same weight and thus the same BMI but with big boobs vs small boobs or wide hips vs narrow hips or long legs vs short legs are going to have very different body fat percentages. So stop derailing every single thread with this.

>> No.10226887

>>10226883
I agree! He doesn't deserve that group of painfully looking trannies and ITAs. Fatty chan to the left trying to hide her triple XL soda and fupa. Fatty chan on thr right though I think is the sweet goth's mom? And poor baby girl on the bottom who's TRYING.

>> No.10226894

>>10226884
Yep, not to mention how wildly sizes vary from brand to brand anyways. An Abercrombie 4 compared to a gap 4 is teeny.

>> No.10226919

>>10226803
Good on you, anon, keep going to the low end of your range. Size is a number and it will depend on your frame but you are doing a good job regardless!

>>10226790
Average height being 5’4, most 14-16 under about 5’6 will be close to if not already into obese class. Also we are talking mostly wearing stretchy clothes in burgerland. So add one size because it's clear to see from photos that they squeeze into stuff and say ’look, it fits’.

>> No.10226931

>>10226847
Not the original poster, but this isn't the Colorado comm. I literally don't recognize a single person here.

>> No.10226933
File: 438 KB, 1024x1024, _n86SAEt9e4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10226933

>> No.10226935

>>10226933
This is adorable. Selfpost?

>> No.10226939

>>10226381
Y'all get so worked up about her claire's pics without realizing she finds it funny you guys care so much

>> No.10226946

>>10226933
The shoes are a nitpick.

>> No.10226948

>>10226878
Fucking thank you, finally just a bad coord. Plain gingham table cloth lookin dress with accessories that don’t match at all, beautiful. And by beautiful I mean horrible, finally some Ita.

And you’re right the above one is totally a selfpost

>> No.10226949

>>10226931

Oh thank god. I'm moving to CO soon, and I'm very hopeful that it's an okay comm at best. That photo is just a trash fire.

>> No.10226957

>>10226949
The CO comm is nice, a good variety of folks near Colorado Springs and Denver.

>> No.10226973

>>10226939
sorry you got posted, T. Learn to dress better and don't call the shit you put on lolita. Simple.

>> No.10226983

>>10226957

I'm coming from SF, so my nose maybe up in the air since we literally live down the street from both BTSSB and AP.

>> No.10227006

>>10226686
i wouldn't feel bad over not knowing, it looks like it's bad quality

>> No.10227009

>>10226852
i fucking hope not, don't curse us with this

>> No.10227010

>>10226933
What dress is this?

>> No.10227011

>>10226973
Sorry i'm not her but stay mad i guess. She's living her best life. Can't say i can stay mad at someone who is living a true lolita lifestyle as an 2010 ott sweet lolita in 2019.

>> No.10227012

>>10226983
Just don't bring your cunt attitude and have a good time, you'll be fine.
I'm a Califag too and somehow managed to not shit over everything, if I can, you can.

>> No.10227013

>>10227011
too bad she's a transtrender who insists on male pronouns despite dressing hyperfemme all the time. dumb

>> No.10227017

>>10227012
Pretty good advice actually.

>> No.10227018

>>10225764
i think it works

>> No.10227019

>>10226076
Calm down crazy, all I said was that I don’t like tattoos but I’m not gonna expect people not to do what they want with their body because of my preferences.

>> No.10227021

>>10227011
keep deluding yourself that 1. you're not her and 2. that you've even comes close to looking like a properly dressed lolita and 3. that you are old enough to have been in lolita for almost 10 years. I bet you are the kind of person who says you were born wearing Lolita. fuck off T. No one likes your shitty "coords" or ita personality

>> No.10227022
File: 323 KB, 1360x2128, DD942646-BC48-46A3-863E-F7681D5F498A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10227022

>>10226865
I don’t know or care what size they are but you’re a dumbass if you actually think their bathing suits look too tight.

Here’s an apology ita for getting involved in pointless fatty arguments.

>> No.10227035
File: 93 KB, 682x1024, z_a9ac90c8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10227035

>> No.10227036

>>10227035
This is cute af

>> No.10227038

I'm 5'10 and wore a size 12 at a BMI of 20 because I don't like my clothes to be too tight.
Caring so much about this and acting as if everything above a certain size is "huuuge" makes you all seem like chubby midgets who are proud of being able to squeeze into an extra small, thinking this makes them "petite" and "dainty" lol

>> No.10227045

>>10226825
That green dress is so ugly. Who even makes meets for these people, the unnecessarily smug girl in the beret? That coord is mediocre at best

>> No.10227059

>>10226847
>>10226791
>>10226793
>>10226803

Can you not fucking read, you insufferable faggots? Nobody said those sizes weren’t fat. Just not the same as obesity at sizes 20 and up.

>> No.10227080

>>10226825
come on dude, this was from a closed group, show some decency

>> No.10227083

damn how are some of these chicks manlier than me? Like damn I could crossplay and look better than most of these, wew.

>> No.10227092

>>10227083
No you wouldn't, sissy-chan.

>> No.10227099

>>10227092
I'm not even a sissy I'm an average looking dude. Some of these hons are so manly though wtf.

>> No.10227152

>>10227022
Fucking agreed. Also this pinafore and shitty wig are eating this girl alive. At least get a Petti instead of spending your money on some unbrushed looking wig or grandma lookin pinafore. Also the completely unmatching purples are so bad.

>> No.10227157

>>10227083
>>10227099

It's the ita thread ya dingus. It means the whole thread is centred on posting fugly, badly-dressed people. Congrats on your useless new knowledge, newbie. Now go away and don't come back.

>> No.10227161

>>10227157
Ugly people shouldn't exist :(

>> No.10227170

>>10226933
Nitpick. I would prefer different-colored shoes and could do without the flower crown. Also, needs more poof, but very cute

>> No.10227174

>>10227022
I would totally wear that bathrobe. Just not outside.

>> No.10227177

>>10227035
Not Lolita, but I like this. It almost works as Steampunk, I think.

>> No.10227220

>>10226852
this is not MA, seconding don't curse us with this

>> No.10227223

>>10226887
>sweet goth
please lurkmoar

>> No.10227225

>>10226933
this is pretty cute

>>10226939
I think she works there

>> No.10227227

>>10227018
I think it's cute too desu. All her coords have that oldschool vibe where things are less cohesive but I think thats a look in itself

>> No.10227229

>>10227036
what are you smokin? lemme have some!

>> No.10227230

>>10227080
so whoever posted this is 1. a newfag cause they don't know the rules and 2. a backstabber for posting ya'll

my condolences ya'll got posted.

>> No.10227232

>>10227083
nobody cares about your crossplay newsis. Please fucking don't

>> No.10227234

>>10226948
That said, half the bitches posting in this thread would dress like this because they're all larpers and armchair lolitas who think they know everything because they spent 6 months "researching" via ita threads on /cgl/ and have never shopped for a lolita item period and wouldn't know where to start, let alone make something that isn't on par with this.

>> No.10227238

>>10225650
>>10225653
This particular indie brand caters ONLY to plus-sized lolitas. They don't even do anything below an L, so they don't give a damn about pissing off skinny lolitas or whatever, since it can't have any impact on their sales.

>> No.10227239

>>10227234
Mad because you got posted, aren’t you?

I mean you right though. So many people on these threads are screaming and nitpicking because they are jealous they don’t own shit I’m sure.

>> No.10227241
File: 61 KB, 499x750, 8F02C8D8-B94F-4965-A1F8-5311C5CB88A3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10227241

Maybe a nitpick but wearing replica is already questionable, and this wig looks awful.

>> No.10227286

>>10226847
lmao, people are fat at size 6.

>> No.10227290

>>10227239
Nah, I've not been in one of these threads for awhile. I also typically hang around the back in group photos even if I'm better dressed.

Roleplayers are a big issue here and you really have to take any commentary with a grain of salt. Normally you can pinpoint someone who has been in the fashion for awhile just because of the comments they leave because they point out actual problems not just "SHIT QUALITY" The quality of the items in this outfit aren't really the issue (except maybe those bows) but the styling of the items, and how they are brought together. My biggest problem is the styling on the bust of the JSK, it doesn't work for her and would look best on a small frame with no boobs to speak of.

>> No.10227292
File: 145 KB, 608x1080, vzKSzvxSR_s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10227292

>> No.10227382

>>10227223
I say that as an insult that she's not doing either styles justice, but yet somehow combined the two.

>> No.10227383

>>10227238
How sad and pathetic.

>> No.10227385

>>10226825
North Carolina I feel for you

>> No.10227396

>>10227286
ok, what height? a size 6 on a 5'2 girl looks really different than someone who's 5'8

>> No.10227409

>>10227396
No it doesn't lol. There's a reason why 00-4 comes in long. Being taller doesn't increase your band size astronomically. Yes a 5'8" person will weigh more than a 5'2" person of the same general BMI but that is not because they necessarily have a larger waist size

>> No.10227421

>>10227409
Oh my god you all really think you’re doctors and health experts here. Just say you hate fat people and move on.

>> No.10227423

>>10227421
We DID. And then the fatty was like wow you're all deranged and need to get help.

>cough

>> No.10227426

I’m a size 8. Idgaf if people hate fattys or not. That’s just how the world works. No ones gunna change anyone’s mind.
So Maybe taking the bait isn’t the right way to go though.

>> No.10227457
File: 215 KB, 750x485, 5E61EFCB-B8B9-4760-BA9F-F416F93F0E8F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10227457

Tf is this pose?

>> No.10227467

>>10227292
cute, she looks like me when I was 14
please don’t post kids anon

>> No.10227494

>>10226184
yeah but that was my point exactly, that it looked TOO intentional.

>> No.10227507

>>10227457
it's the "my boobs are giant and pulling my back down uncomfortably, making the rest of my neck/head jut out"

>> No.10227515

>>10225692
Thank god someone posted this. Reina is a fucking disaster. I still hold a grudge over her shitty work ethic. My friend bought a full commission from her (around $50) and she still hasnt even started it. That was two months ago.

>> No.10227516

>>10227457
The "T-Rex Trainee"

>> No.10227523

>>10225764
I like the hat, eyepatch, socks, shoes, and whatever that black messy skirt thing is. The hat, eyepatch, and her expression/pose/hair work really well together and I kind of want to draw it.
>>10225767
cosplay, not ita.
>>10226345
At what point can we admit it's too much? How does she manage to get through airport security?
>>10226933
This is unironically adorable and I'd wear it out

>> No.10227533
File: 114 KB, 960x960, AD18AEE0-399C-45E5-A521-1B8CB1DAEF87.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10227533

The ahegao face. The caption that came with the photo. The horrific lack of legwear. She says she bought all the stuff from mylolitadress and gives no mention of brand names. My word, she’s almost a textbook ita.

>> No.10227622

>>10227533
What more do you need?

>> No.10227633

>>10227622
I was expecting a replica or a split colour pastel wig desu.

>> No.10227638

>>10227533
I think she can be helped. She's by far not the worst ita.
>>10227292
I'm assuming the eye makeup is for the mask when it's on.

Both of these girls also seem kind of young.

>> No.10227650

>>10227633
Since split ones were at one time all the rage and common, why would they be considered ita?

>> No.10227652

>>10226847
I wear size 12 pants and I'm not fat desu

>> No.10227663

>>10225611
This is disgusting on top of being terrible. Obese, disgusting, pastel eyesore.

>> No.10227690

>>10227652
You can wear a size 37 and be tiny if Old Navy or Guess or whatever printed that number on their little tags. It just depends on what your BMI is.

>> No.10227692
File: 255 KB, 750x743, 1C1A2081-8FA8-4CD5-A9AE-4DB9EB662695.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10227692

This thread is ridiculous. 268 replies and 41 images? Y’all waste too much time about whining about land whales and Ana-chans.

To be productive, can we all at least agree that Kawaii Dress Shop makes hideous dresses, for thins and fats alike?

>> No.10227721

>>10227692
Ohh my god this is hideous. My eyes are burning. Who looked at woody and went.”you know what, he needs to be lolita?” who. I demand answers. They couldn’t have based a dress off Bo peep instead?

>> No.10227732

>>10227650
Because times change old man, evolve or die.

>> No.10227734

>>10227690
Haha, trading one imaginary number for another anon.
Do you even lift?

>> No.10227754

>>10225515
honestly at this point; props to this chick.

>> No.10227755

>>10225764
Okay, am I the only one who loves this?

>> No.10227757

Is it fair game to post things from insta tagged sweetlolita that are in no capacity sweet lolita? Because holy shit.

>> No.10227759

>>10227755
I think so. The rest of us agreed that it’s just a bit too much elements, so it’s distracting and 1-2 pieces should be removed to make it good.

>> No.10227764
File: 875 KB, 828x1264, 789A9518-0578-41BD-AAAE-5909AD39B180.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10227764

Haha you’re so “quirky.” Shut up and out on a blouse, wrist cuffs, and a petti. Also get that ddlg collar off you and try trying to look sexy at the camera.

>> No.10227766

>>10226345
why didn't she use the same app for both photos?

>> No.10227767

*quit trying. Sorry I’m a fucking dumbass lol.

>> No.10227768

>>10227764
selfpost

>> No.10227774

>>10227768
Nah that ain’t me. I don’t fuck with posting my face online.

>> No.10227775

>>10227764
why do anons think all chokers are "ddlg collars"

>> No.10227776

>>10227774
Dunno, the overly aggressive nature of your comment for a coord that isn't terrible feels like someone fishing for compliments/validation.

>> No.10227777

>>10227775
It has a lock in the heart.

>> No.10227779

Y’all are so hypocritical if a fatty or ugly girl was wearing that you’d loose your mind about all the rules she’s breaking.

>> No.10227781

>>10227779
If you can break the rules and look good doing it, who cares? Japanese lolitas don't have such strict "rules" in the fashion, it's an entirely western concept.

>> No.10227782

>>10227777
So? It’s a trend people wear all the time

>> No.10227784

>>10227732
They’re still really cute when done well. Lolita is way less trend dependent than mainstream fashion, it’s not about things being “in” or not, it only matters if you do it well.

>> No.10227803

>>10227764
You must be a lolita at heart if you think she’s ita.

>> No.10227817

>>10227803
Lol sorry you got posted? Just because the photo composition is nice doesn’t mean the coord is passable.

>> No.10227835

>>10227817
It’s so obvious you don’t actually wear the fashion.

>> No.10227836

>>10227764
pretty sure that choker is from a larme brand like eatme or something, not a ddlg store

calm down

>> No.10227837

>>10227836
It’s from Rosemarie Seoir

>> No.10227839

>>10227764
It’s a nice outfit but not really lolita imho.

>> No.10227840

>>10227757
as long as it’s interesting

>> No.10227844
File: 292 KB, 1024x1024, 0iMha0pr7Ik.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10227844

>> No.10227847

>>10227286
gr8 b8 m8

>> No.10227849

>>10227467
How do we know if this is a kid? I'm like 24 and I'm still getting mistaken for a teenager - even when I was 22 and student teaching middle schoolers (so a school with a student population aged 12-14), I was still getting mistaken for a student.

>> No.10227851

>>10227533
The ahegao face normally is what hits my berzerk button the most, but it's more subdued here. It looks more like she's just trying to look like an edgy punk rather than an orgasming anime girl

>> No.10227853

>>10227650
They're ita magnets. Not inherently bad, just itas seem especially drawn to them.

>> No.10227854

>>10227849
>I'm like 24
Why don't you know whether you're exactly 24 or not?
>I'm still getting mistaken for a teenager
>I was still getting mistaken for a student
Okaaayyy, congrats, want an ice cream as a reward?

>> No.10227855

>>10227764
Somehow this is worse than just a clueless newbie or a dumbass normie who somehow got their paws on AP

>> No.10227856

>>10227776
nayrt but who the fuck would validate this? It's legit awful. And besides, selfposts usually don't give specific crits, they just drop it or make generic comment like "burn it" Why would you post a coord when you know exactly how to improve it?

>> No.10227857

>>10227854
Bottom line -
Grown women can be mistaken for 14-year-olds. How do we know she's 14?

>> No.10227859

>>10227757
no
people need to stop doing this, to post something in the ita thread it needs to be a lolita attempt, not a tag in an algorithmically generated tag cloud

>> No.10227864
File: 171 KB, 768x1024, 1563860738050.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10227864

>> No.10227865

>>10227856
The girl clearly knows she's "breaking rules" as evidenced by her insta caption.

>> No.10227866

>>10227865
But the difference is that she thinks she can look good while still breaking the rules.
Which sometimes people can, depending on the rules. But this...no.

>> No.10227868

>>10227864
Ironic how the outfit rundown could also be mistaken for a list of everything wrong if they also added the gloves, wig and makeup.

>> No.10227876
File: 960 KB, 1444x2048, 1563733433684.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10227876

>> No.10227886

>>10227864
>dollar store

usually i find it bothersome when people say "offbrand" or even "taobao" instead of listing the actual brand of the item, but in this case, anything is better than saying "dollar store"

>> No.10227896

>>10225764
how are people defending this? I hate everything about this.

>> No.10227901

>>10227864
>petti: Abdominal Fat

>> No.10227930

>>10227835
Sorry about your bad taste.

>> No.10227933

>>10227854
You must have gotten wrinkles real young if this makes you so mad.

>> No.10227939

>>10227886
I don’t list anything but the brands I think are significant. Offbrand or Taobao is fine to say. I remember some people posting about Japanese lolitas just say ‘I don’t remember’ rather than admitting they are wearing something from Bodyline. Good policy.

>> No.10227942

>>10227864
It’s a complete shit coord that needs an overhaul but I’m not mad at the photo format. It just looks like just a fashion diary entry page, which yes would list everything in that amount of detail. When you start your coord building with a Bodyline main piece, especially if it’s a print, you need everything else to go up from there, not down.

>> No.10227943

>>10227930
Save up for at least one full coord, then you can start critiquing.

>> No.10227996

How many trannies in one thread?

>> No.10228023
File: 136 KB, 1128x1986, FB_IMG_1563985638533.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10228023

Yikes o'clock

>> No.10228035
File: 163 KB, 720x960, 1563833823717.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10228035

>> No.10228236

>>10228035
I just noticed the bear claws. It reminds me of a teenagers myspace

>> No.10228326

>>10226345
is she posing in a fucking claires?

>> No.10228333

>>10227515
That's fucking despicable lol

Her and Tearzah are both pedophile lolcows who both copied a style from that girl CatShops. It's so funny.

>> No.10228342

>>10227876
the thumbnail made me think the shadow was a beard

>> No.10228389

>>10227943
You’re really invested in believing this.

>> No.10228570

>>10227933
She's probably balding at 28.
That wasn't even meant as a humble brag, because I hate looking younger than I am. Good for lolita, but not good for my career, for being taken seriously, or for dating.

>> No.10228573

>>10228326
Oh my sweet summer child, how new are you that you haven't seen lip-piercing-chan?
She gets posted in here pretty often and most of her coord shots are mirror shots in a Claires.

>> No.10228595

>>10228333
oh wow tearzah is a name I never thought I’d ever see brought up on here t b h

ngl I stole her brush settings she was so determined never to share some years ago just to piss her off

>> No.10228631

>>10227939
well then you just get a bunch of people asking "where's xyz from?" i like to list all of the items (even if it's just target or macy's or something) and strongly prefer that other people do the same both for my benefit (so if i like something i know where to get it) and for their own (to cut down on those kinds of questions)

>> No.10228684

>>10227650
We might be seeing split wigs used again since some split colored dresses have come out on Taobao. Just depends on how popular these dresses will get.

>> No.10228687

>>10227939
I think people should mention the taobao brand. It may not be seen as better quality or as important but the brand still deserves credit..

>> No.10228829

>>10227764
not everything is ddlg tards

>>10227777
okay and? damn i've heard more about ddlg from cgl than i have from actual ddlgers. What ain't ddlg at this point? At this point it's getting kinda obnoxious and irritating that you can't just do shit without someone being like "this is ddlg" like people read so much into non issue?

>>10227781
Yeah the "rules" are a lot more loose for Japanese lolitas from what i noticed. They maintain the general aesthetic of the style and fashion, but otherwise break all the rules western lolitas old ourselves by.

>> No.10229015

>>10227864
The pic on the far left makes her look like a dude who lost a bet and he's now gotta figure out if that's the correct way to stand as a woman in heels

>> No.10229018

>>10228035
I know people hate those demonia boots, but I so want a pair..... They're so cute. I wish they had a softer pastel pink

>> No.10229022

>>10227849
I’m ayrt, maybe you’re right but it’s still better to be on the side of caution when considering posting someone who looks rather young, seeing yourself on a site like this at an age where you’re still figuring things out can really fuck with your self esteem

>> No.10229028

>>10228035
conceptually I love this. Just could do with a bit of polish and better shoes

>> No.10229460
File: 87 KB, 960x960, 67723105_10157279493582591_2171809140173701120_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10229460

>> No.10229464

>>10229460
How many times we gonna post this coord

>> No.10229622
File: 453 KB, 1240x1455, 798DD336-9F12-421E-8E56-4F713DFC260F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10229622

The lolita reddit is cancer.

>> No.10229761
File: 75 KB, 800x800, 112F5C07-0ADA-4B9D-95CA-2B7B820C556F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10229761

>> No.10229762

>>10229761
Forgot to say, but this showed up in the top ten search results for punk lolita

>> No.10230250
File: 103 KB, 562x750, E83C83C5-161F-46AB-A20C-C40EDD26BFD3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10230250

She said she built the coord around a music festival.
What a fucking mess this is

>> No.10230382

>>10230250
awful makeup, but otherwise I like this.

>> No.10230396

>>10229762
Anon...that's a punk rave dress.

>> No.10230410

>>10230250
love it desu

>> No.10230448

>>10225611
nitpick. You just don't like the fact that a fatass can pull off loli better than you.

>> No.10230450
File: 79 KB, 480x479, 8E37E03D-8E90-44E2-B0C5-52347F0F43B6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10230450

>>10225502

>> No.10230504

>>10230448
bait harder

>> No.10231657

>>10230250

It’s a typical casual old school coord though

You must be new to the fashion anon