[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 578 KB, 1080x1324, Screenshot_20210925_214945.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677086 No.10677086 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.10677087
File: 654 KB, 1061x1317, Screenshot_20210925_214850.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677087

>> No.10677089
File: 670 KB, 1080x1229, Screenshot_20210925_214905.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677089

>>10677087

>> No.10677090
File: 461 KB, 1080x1335, Screenshot_20210925_214934.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677090

>>10677089

>> No.10677091
File: 259 KB, 1080x721, Screenshot_20210925_215033.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677091

>>10677090

>> No.10677092
File: 549 KB, 1080x1323, Screenshot_20210925_215112.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677092

>>10677091

>> No.10677093
File: 293 KB, 1080x1070, Screenshot_20210925_215127.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677093

>>10677092

>> No.10677094
File: 201 KB, 1045x1183, Screenshot_20210925_215148.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677094

>>10677093
Also had tags like #littleone and #daddysgirl

>> No.10677098

>>10677094
Why is it that every DDLG age player is fat, ugly, or both? Like that one DDLG TikTok sexworker who’s obese but pretends she isn’t because she fits in AP, or the ass ugly one trying to sell her feces and jizzed stained AP on lacemarket?

>> No.10677100

>>10677087
This is pretty nice minus the awful shoe choice.

>> No.10677101

>>10677098
Because nobody agrees to fuck them except for weird pedos

>> No.10677105

>>10677098
Because they didn't have a father or had a bad relationship with their father.

>> No.10677170
File: 166 KB, 1080x869, Cof.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677170

>> No.10677172

>>10677105
As expected of men.

>> No.10677193

>>10677090
She annoys me so much. Coords are always ita and her questions are always exhausting and stupid

>> No.10677255

>>10677092
Ngl I like this. It's not lolita but as a general look I like it. Hair on the left looks awful though.

>> No.10677277

>>10677092
I think right is super cute

>> No.10677295

>>10677277
you look like shit

>> No.10677299

>>10677295
agree.

>> No.10677373
File: 1.02 MB, 1170x1071, F7A98AA6-0824-4248-B93D-09E92FC14C44.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677373

>> No.10677377
File: 1.30 MB, 1170x1457, 09427279-CB01-4616-9E12-863747B610FB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677377

>> No.10677380
File: 1.30 MB, 1170x1143, FEB37F18-5F4D-4FA6-8C10-D485E86180B0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677380

>> No.10677385
File: 1.42 MB, 1170x1197, ECC09D49-A827-43B0-8B03-F208207534BA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677385

>> No.10677386

>>10677277
Agreed. I don't like the tattoos though and she'd look better if she lost weight but otherwise she looks cute.

>> No.10677388
File: 1.16 MB, 1170x1182, DD657C4F-70E1-4AE0-8331-77C5C71F6404.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677388

>> No.10677390

>>10677377
Nitpick but not ita.

>> No.10677392
File: 1.94 MB, 1170x1441, F7FE0F36-D315-4AB3-85C5-7A011BC31A4B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677392

>> No.10677394

>>10677386
Stop WK yourself, it's such a cringe

>> No.10677414

>>10677380
I actually like this...

>> No.10677416

>>10677394
Do you have a problem with people giving compliments?

>> No.10677421

>>10677373
that hair completely ruins it

>> No.10677422

>>10677385
what the fuck is going on with her calves

>> No.10677424

>>10677422
She’s fat

>> No.10677426

>>10677373
She needs to stop blushing her nose so heavily. I don’t think she’s terribly hideous or anything, but girl please learn how to do makeup that actually flatters your face shape.

Her coords on the other hand… I don’t even know where to start.

>> No.10677431
File: 379 KB, 1255x2015, F60FE07B-F817-4A90-9ADF-61670FF2F2A6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677431

>> No.10677439
File: 1.31 MB, 1284x1434, 25FC719B-D3BF-4059-A8DC-F10901ACDE9A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677439

I have only ever seen one or two ero lolita coords look good and the rest are dumpster fires.

>> No.10677441
File: 1.97 MB, 1284x1267, 4061E240-1782-4AA5-AF09-9D97AF617893.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677441

>>10677439

>> No.10677444
File: 1.69 MB, 1284x1585, BAB50630-D07B-40E6-B5C4-3CF6381F523D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677444

>>10677441

>> No.10677446
File: 1023 KB, 1284x1257, 522685A6-A681-4FA3-8B4B-00F5AFD61BE9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677446

>>10677444
Why is it always uggos and fatties that have such confidence to post these shit “ero” coords?

>> No.10677447
File: 1.73 MB, 1284x1242, 99B24827-1A74-4D7B-AA50-EEB96FE2A2D4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677447

>>10677446

>> No.10677450

>>10677444
Why does the crease of her armpit fold in on itself and look like a gaping butthole?

>> No.10677453

>>10677446
Is this a.gato??

>> No.10677454

>>10677450
Excess of arm fat and loose skin

>> No.10677469

>>10677447
I kinda like this ngl

>> No.10677475

>>10677469
Your taste is shit. Hair is greasy and unstyled. I can smell this photo.

>> No.10677478

>>10677475
The coord is decent tho imho

>> No.10677479

>>10677478
*dress not coord lmao

>> No.10677489

>>10677390
Are you blind? Everything about this looks ugly including that god awful editing.

>> No.10677490

>>10677469
Then you have tacky taste

>> No.10677500

>>10677479
The dress is horrible and trash.

>> No.10677558

>>10677380
Cute

>> No.10677564

>>10677170
Sis looks like she has a double chin

>> No.10677566

There’s some blind gulls out today damn

>> No.10677575

>>10677447
i like the dress and tights
anyone know where they are from?
is the dress handmade

>> No.10677583

>>10677416
>a normie tshirt
>a normie vest
>a cheap taobao jsk that doesn't fit (look the sideboobs!)
>fucking sneakers
>compliments

I wonder who can give them besides the girl herself. Also, the comment said that there are tattoos and I

You can hardly see it and I don't think someone will ever notice them unless they know it's there

>> No.10677605

>>10677092
they look like cheap hoes honestly

>> No.10677607

Do you ever feel bad about the fact that most of these girls probably don’t even know this site exists and yet their on here to be made fun of for everybody’s entertainment. It’s kinda fucked up. Let people love you salty cunts.

>> No.10677608

>>10677607
No. You must be new.

>> No.10677609

>>10677607
i do, i honestly never comment on these girls in this thread except for learning experience (why is this ita?) and learning what NOT to do

i don't agree with the bullying, i'm sure most people here posted are just really misguided

>> No.10677612

>>10677607
its the one of the few forms of gatekeeping we have left in this niche fashion. if there weren't any sort of quality control no one would improve and kinksters would run ramped

its already full of sjw lards who cant dress but insist on wearing the cringiest tackiest shit that makes the rest of us look bad

they can have fun in other clothes they really dont need to try so hard to be lolita they only label themselves for community attention so the ita thread gives them that attention

>> No.10677613

>>10677609
It's for clothes. How is that bullying when it's literally about the clothing lol

>> No.10677627

>>10677613
i've seen fatty-chans that actually had a good/half decent coord but are posted simply for being fat/not cute/whatever the hell doesn't have to do with the clothing

>> No.10677655

>>10677607
>>10677609
>>10677627
The problem with the ita thread is that, while there are genuine itas posted (bless their hearts, we hope they improve), it does get hijacked for fatspo from time to time, and sometimes it's more obvious than others. Jannies are usually good about taking down obvious vendettas, but when it comes to fatspo, I think they are anas or at least ana sympathizers.

>>10677613
>It's literally about the clothes
See
>>10677454
>>10677450
>>10677446
>>10677424
>>10677612

I agree with >>10677609, this thread can be a learning experience when actual itas are posted.

>> No.10677657

>>10677655
I’m the person who dumped the ero coords and it’s not a “vendetta” to dump a bunch of shit coords all from different people. Or to call fat people fat for that matter.
.

>> No.10677659

>>10677657
AYRT I didn't say it was. Your reading comprehension sucks. Probably a lack of nutrients to the brain. Go back and read it again a few times.

>> No.10677662

>>10677659
It’s all shite crying about defending fatties and calling it vendetta. And you quoted one of my posts. Fun fact, being overweight is scientifically proven to cause issues with cognitive function so your

>hurr ur dumb ana brain haha

Goes both ways for the whales youre crying about.

>> No.10677663

>>10677662
You're an idiot. Quit derailing the thread trying to defend yourself and your terrible personality and post more actual itas.

>> No.10677664

>>10677663
You were the one derailing the thread over
>muh vendetta
When it absolutely isn’t the case. Quit seething now that someone is calling out your horse shit takes.

>> No.10677665
File: 1.40 MB, 900x1668, 9E25E556-DDDC-45EF-BCD8-BB6C7AEFD466.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677665

>> No.10677666

>>10677295
Lmao ok bitch that’s not me in the pic I’m an average looking white chick but ok. The denim vest is cute on her but would look silly on me

>> No.10677669

>>10677380
this would be great if she used a different blouse, this one looks lumpy and awkward

>> No.10677681

>>10677665
how do you make moitie look this shitty? Is the picture just really unfortunate?

>> No.10677685

>>10677609
Anon don't take coording advice from cgl. This place is worse than BSOLF cause you have no way of knowing how much experience anons have or if they're even lolitas. Honestly half this board is probably larpers. Just study coords from experienced girls if you want to learn how to git gud.

>> No.10677686

>>10677669
Agree- but that still makes it a nitpick IMO/ I still really dig this look and IDK if that's just because I'm tacky or what.

>> No.10677716

>>10677685
Half of CoF advice is larpers or worse, honestly. Cgl is at least going to give you advice or concrit, where you're usually not going to get much.

>> No.10677724

>>10677681
by being a troon

>> No.10677730

>>10677716
half of cgl is larpers or worse too depending on what day you visit.

>> No.10677731

>>10677730
Considering I keep having idiots call me a larper, I think if you count the amount of people calling others larpers then it's wildly inaccurate to believe that every single time 'someone is called out' they are a larper.

Realistically, there are a lot of morons that push some stuff regarding lolita on here that wasn't a thing 10 years ago and sounds like they are very new. But the fact when they get challenged they call everyone else larpers, realistically I think you're just seeing a clash between old and new fucking morons. Not larpers.

>> No.10677732
File: 216 KB, 749x1031, 7542EE6B-D93E-496E-9BFE-2F3A6E61A0DB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677732

This coord is cute and great for her renaissance faire trip, but oof that dress does not fit her bust at all, not to mention the length is proportionally incorrect.

>> No.10677734

>>10677732
She looks like a Fable character

>> No.10677740

>>10677731
when i say larpers i don't mean people people accused of larping, i mean lolita at heart types replying in ways that make it really obvious they spend a lot of time in lolita online spaces but clearly don't wear it and never have. often they go unnoticed or people ignore it because no one who isn't super new really has anything to prove and sees that as mostly a waste of time.

also many of them straight up admit they don't wear lolita but 'are into' the fashion, the same language as fb posters in bsolf who wear stuff that is clearly not lolita and try so hard to call it lolita.

i was exaggerating when i said half of cgl but there are a big enough handful of legitimate larpers that most critique and advice should be taken with a huge grain of salt, moreso than usual.

>> No.10677745

>>10677740
I don't totally agree. A good amount of very great feedback and concrit has come out of cgl since 2006. Sure, the lolita community is really full of bad feedback now but you're seeing that more in open lolita spaces than on cgl. I see the worst feedback openly towards lolitas in open spaces, rather than on cgl if you want me to be blunt. You're going to have more contact with people who have been in the community for a lot longer on this board. A lot of us don't see a point in venturing into newbie spaces.

>> No.10677748

>>10677745
oh yeah fb and off-anon spaces don't necessarily have better advice either. cgl just also isn't much better, especially when the feedback is more often 'this looks like shit' than 'this would look better with x'. and the second kind of feedback when it is given is often accused of wking when people offer it too. ita threads are functionally only here to tear into people or share shocking/entertaining pics of bad outfits, not give them good concrit.

>> No.10677751

>>10677748
I've given good concrit in the threads, sure not everyone does but that's not a per-requisite when there's more than enough resources to understand how tf you are messing up so bad to end up in an ita thread.

Realistically, you'll get a better idea of what to not do from these threads. You don't need words.

>> No.10677752

>>10677748
Sorry you got posted btw.

>> No.10677753

>>10677752
i'm one of the people who occasionally offers good concrit. i've even been complimented by multiple other gulls on my concrit suggestions for people in past ita threads, but then told in others that there is no saving certain coords and any attempt at critique and not just insulting the person in the image is being a wk

i get that these threads are an obvious what not to do but to pretend they exist for more than entertainment for the majority of people is just that, pretending.

>> No.10677758
File: 252 KB, 1188x2363, 5ayl9kpzpup71.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10677758

>> No.10677760

>>10677716
You can tell whether someone on CoF is a larper or not by looking at their profile or post history. Their names are attached to what they're saying and you can check how long they've been in the fashion and judge their own coording skills. There is 0 fact checking on cgl.

>> No.10677764

>>10677760
This.

>> No.10677769

>>10677758
LEAVE MUSHROOM GIRL ALONE, SHE IS PURE, P U R E!

>> No.10677771

>>10677764
>>10677760
Truthfully. I don't post on cof so it doesn't prove much. Some of us don't post on fb spaces and there's a lot of tenure lolitas that absolutely don't. There's more newbies on cof than anything.

I've noticed the lolita community literally has no clue or even looks at a lot of very tenured lolitas that used to be popular when I started. So I know this is not true.

>> No.10677810

>>10677681
Wearing a cheap bow and sitting in the most unladylike manor possible

>> No.10677843

>>10677657
>>10677662
>>10677664
Ooof, someone got really triggered by the truth lol. The body shaming that goes on in the ita threads can't be denied. You're a dumbass if you try. But >>10677685 and >>10677716 are both right; any online space pertaining to lolita fashion tends to attract larpers and LAHs, and even scrotes, troons, and anas from time to time. The best advice really is to study experienced lolitas and don't take anything you read online (especially an anonymous board) too seriously.

>> No.10677845

>>10677843
>crying about “body shaming” on fucking 4chan

>> No.10677880

>>10677845
No one's crying about it ffs. Just pointing it out as a reality of the site. Anyone who denies that it's real or that these threads aren't occasionally used for so-called "fatspo" or whatever is deluded. Why do so many gulls rage when someone points this out? Just admit it happens and move on.

>> No.10677899

>>10677681
Yeah seeing this on cof genuinely upset me, what a waste of good moite
The tights, the makeup, THE TRAINERS, tragic

>> No.10677904

>>10677899
>>10677681
at least you guys don’t have her in your comm…

>> No.10677905

>>10677904
I’m so sorry anon, at least you’ll always look good standing next to that

>> No.10677915

>>10677732
is this even trying to be lolita? looks like a dirndl being worn like a dirndl

>> No.10677964

>>10677732
The skirt should be longer or the bodice should be shorter. Otherwise this is a nitpick

>> No.10677966

>>10677880
Sure jan

>> No.10677968

>>10677904
Just avoid large group photos with them

>> No.10677975

>>10677964
Don't start this bullshit about an ita being a nitpick again. The girl looks horrible.

>> No.10677996

>>10677758
I actually love this. The angle is a bit questionable but I think it’s a video screenshot.

Any one know where I can get those earrings?

>> No.10678001

>>10677905
Kek, I actually love being in photos with itas but hate being in comms with them. In photos it’s a huge advantage because anything wrong with my coords seems minor. In a comm it’s a fucking nightmare because then you have to be seen in public with them :/

>> No.10678003

>>10677975
Not great but not an eyesore. The main problem is the cut of the dress.

weird you call out nitpicking for this photo but not for >>10677758

>> No.10678004
File: 39 KB, 464x758, 1632678597683.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10678004

>>10677769

>> No.10678034

>>10678003
>Not great but not an eyesore
No, it's an eyesore. If I saw that on the street, I wouldn't even assume she was attempting lolita.

>> No.10678069

>>10677760
Yeah I've been given stupid advice on CoF and when I check their post history it's some ita. I usually ignore them. It's harder to do that here, but usually when someone gets found out posting itas they're usually ita themselves. Anyone remember Swan chan with the unibrows?
That's why I always take things gulls say here with a big pinch of salt kek.

>> No.10678072
File: 1.66 MB, 1456x1456, 1632525919870.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10678072

>> No.10678086

>>10677665
mads mikkelsen looking rough

>> No.10678094

>>10678086
Cmon don’t do my boy Mads like that

>> No.10678146

>>10677255
>>10677277
As usual, here come the white knights pretending that blatant itas look good just because they're black

>> No.10678153

>>10677431
Cant believe she is wearing this monstrosity to a wedding

>> No.10678155

>>10678153
Nevermind how hideous it is, something that OTT is just wholly inappropriate

>> No.10678203

>>10678153
>>10678155
Kek wait. Was she not the bride? Holy cannoli that’s a pass from me. If someone wore Lolita to my wedding I’d actually be pissed.

>> No.10678211

>>10678203
Why? As long as it’s not white, it doesn’t really matter. Don’t tell me you’re that much of an attention whore.

>> No.10678230

>>10678211
Ok I’m sorry, but there’s a time and place for Lolita. Funerals, weddings and pretty much all similar events should be off limits. You just look like a twat.

>> No.10678247

>>10678211
Um, the attention whore is the one wearing this shit to a wedding. Not the people who politely wear simple coords or normie clothes.

>> No.10678248

>>10678230
Tbf it is a D&D themed wedding reception so it might not be that much out of place. On the other hand this is a poorly patterned and executed attempt at OTT classic…..that smocking is so haphazard looking.

>> No.10678254

>>10678203
She was asked to make a "golden dragon" lolita dress for it by the groom iirc. Her sewing skills aren't great so I just would have said no if I were her and bought some taobao shit. Don't come at her for making something she was asked to make, come at her for the awful design.

>> No.10678257

>>10678248
Ok, that’s more understandable then. Still ugly, but not as insanely impolite as i assumed.

>> No.10678272

>>10678211
Lolitas wearing coords to non-Lolita events are just so cringe.

>> No.10678276

>>10678272
For family/friend/work events, yeah. But if you’re just going to a street fair or symphony or something then who cares.

>> No.10678279 [DELETED] 

>>10678272
Not having the balls to do that is cringe, larper.

>> No.10678300

>>10678276
Even then desu, if it’s an ott coord you really look like a twat and you’re kinda inconveniencing other people with your petti and any large accessories.

>> No.10678303

>>10678300
Could you be any more of a LARPer? Pettis aren’t any bigger than your average American landwhale. And idk wtf accessory would cause any inconvenience to strangers. Normies carry around umbrellas and bags too.

>> No.10678345

>>10678303
>Pettis aren’t any bigger than your average American landwhale
Kek im actually dying anon thanks for that

>> No.10678347

>>10678272
So, you say I can't wear my AP besides cons and meet ups?

>> No.10678363

>>10677377
this feels like a racist edited it, that poor Black woman!

>> No.10678365

>>10677422
its called horizontal stripes - they visually enlarge the area they are on. In this case, her calves which are already not sticc have been made to look even bigger.

>> No.10678366

>>10678272
*Laughs in lifestyler*

>> No.10678367

>>10677453
A cat??? WHERE

>> No.10678370

>>10678072
When will she hold herself accountable for this coord

>> No.10678412

>>10678367
No the person goes by a.gato

>> No.10678413

>>10678272
For me, the only place where wearing lolita would be inappropriate is job interviews, work-related settings in general - unless you happen to work in an alt fashion store or something similar - and sports. You could technically wear it for every other setting albeit you'd have to tone it down sometimes, but that's why "casual" lolita is a thing.

>> No.10678440

>>10678413
Ironically, I had an internal interview one time when I was dressed up in office for halloween in lolita.

I could have been pulled in at any time during that week, but I just so happened to get pulled in the day I dressed up. So funny. I did get the job, though.

>> No.10678441

>>10678413
Also to note, I've seen lolitas roam around the Microsoft building/offices. If you work in tech, you can get away with wearing it daily in the office. Personally, I wouldn't do it because I am more in the social realm. Got to keep a reputation a bit more.

>> No.10678445

In regards to >>10677431 it looks bad, an inappropriate to wear to a wedding, but not because it's lolita. lolita has levels of formality like any other clothing but people in the community don't understand fashion appropriateness. that's why so many people ITT like >>10678272 are responding this way. they don't understand how fashion works so they have a kneejerk reaction because they likely see all lolita as formal. no one is out here putting together OTT coords to run errands, but if you think lolita can't be worn everywhere other than a strict business professional setting, you need to learn how fashion works.

>> No.10678451

>>10678445
You *can* wear it anywhere but you really shouldn’t. There are many occasions where it’s largely inappropriate. ie: weddings funerals family outings and job interviews.

>> No.10678454 [DELETED] 

Please check out this video

https://youtu.be/lS9X19BAoJQ

Thanks

>> No.10678455

>>10678451
Whether you'll be able to wear it for family outings really depends on your family, my own family is pretty cool about it thankfully. Lolita for weddings is okay imo if you keep it casual and don't end up looking like you're trying to out-do the bride (>>10677431
would definitely be too much), but I agree on the rest

>> No.10678458

>>10678441
seconding, if you work on the tech or design side of tech and not the business side/HR side/any kind of consulting nobody gives a rat’s ass what you look like (even in pretty conservative places, at least in burgerland). not sure why that is. i guess programmers/designers are kind of expected to be off-beat.

>> No.10678461

>>10678458
I work as a DBA and my coworkers see my packages I get delivered at work and they ask why i dont wear my cute dresses to work.
I do think id be even more out of place than what id like. But more importantly Id have to wake up earlier to get dressed. Which I am not a morning person. Jeans and tshirt take literally a minute to put on.

>> No.10678463

>>10678451
You are very much just proving my point. if you can't see that lolita has many different levels of appropriateness you probably don't have the skills to coordinate something that is formal and toned down enough to be appropriate for those kinds of events.(and your normie outfits are probably only vaguely passable because they literally categorize them for you at the store) either that, or you are trying to overcorrect for others when you don't know anyone's particular circumstances or what their family/friends feel is appropriate anyway. regardless it's embarrassing and more embarrassing than someone looking out of place at a family gathering that doesn't concern you. but most lolitas are so insecure that the shitty community makes them lose confidence.

>> No.10678468

>>10678463
>you are trying to overcorrect for others when you don't know anyone's particular circumstances or what their family/friends feel is appropriate
This is my problem with both this thread and the community. Everyone is always quick to insult others they end up being hypocrites. Like in this thread we've resorted to other people's personal business like this through a normie lens, when most people who aren't lifestylers aren't for practical reasons like >>10678461
The real issue is that the wedding coord upthread is ita as fuck. And responses like >>10678451 are cringy to me because they assume that everyone cares about being normie compliant. This is the same as when people just post shit they don't like ITT like ugly girls or fatties. We shouldn't become so low that we have to pretend we care about normie dress codes.

>> No.10678473

>>10678468
>Like in this thread we've resorted to other people's personal business like this through a normie lens
*to gossiping about other people's business
My bad for the text deletion.

>> No.10678497

>>10678468
>pretend we care about normie dress codes.
Sorry. But my work pays my bills and I do care. My own personal life is my own time and I'm not a worker slave off the clock. So realistically, this is the difference between being autistic and not. I'm fully aware my work would not approve, so thus I do not step beyond those boundaries because I like money and keeping my reputation.

>> No.10678518

>>10677441
Zero effort given

>> No.10678521

>>10678497
Someone found my Instagram. Still don't know how they managed that, fake name and not attached to any of my work socials. Nobody has directly confronted me on it but I've had to decline sexual offers and call out inappropriate questions.

>> No.10678522

>>10678463
No any version of Lolita is inappropriate for someone else’s wedding

>> No.10678527

>>10678521
People are fucking creeps

>>10678522
Shit like this is why normies hate cringe lolitas. If you can’t decipher why it’s not ok to wear any form of alt fashion to someone else’s private event centered around normie aesthetic you don’t deserve to be part of society.

>> No.10678531

>>10677377
I really hate this dress
No one can make it look good

>> No.10678539

>>10678527
>>10678522
Can you people read? Why are you assuming every wedding is for normies? Or that everyone has lolita friends? You are the real cringe in this community. And the bride usually doesn't care what the guests wear if they're not in the wedding party anyway. Have any of you even been to any weddings?

>> No.10678542

>>10678521
Someone you know probably, personally or something. Also if your email is attached to anything.

Or number. Tiktok literally goes through your phone book and refers to one another.

You basically need to separate everything. I should probably take my own advice, but I also try to keep a lot of coworkers off of socials nowadays.

>> No.10678568

>>10677441
>>10677444
if you're fat or chubby don't bother going blouseless and spare our eyes

>> No.10678576

>>10678568
Piss-chan isn't fat, it's just her arms

>> No.10678577
File: 429 KB, 1268x1920, tumblr_c03374c3f6bf137ba36b45f47a1402fa_857eff09_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10678577

>> No.10678578

>>10678539
>the bride usually doesn't care what the guests wear if they're not in the wedding party
Anon there’s a whole subreddit of bridezillas that illustrate quite the opposite. I don’t know single bride who would welcome a white dress or Lolita/cosplay unless that was the theme of the event. Wearing Lolita to a normie wedding is fucked.

>> No.10678579

>>10678577
Whenever I see this I just assume they live in a crusty hoarder den or something.

>> No.10678581

Some of you are total normies outside of lolita and surround yourselves with them and it really shows

>> No.10678582
File: 14 KB, 345x437, dge13VNXK0Zr7MihZCfNNiyWYU9scdvzKg5zNoD7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10678582

>>10678578
The fashion has multiple nuances. Wearing ott classic or sweet to a wedding would be borderline attention seeking but if I were a bride and one of my guests is wearing something simple like picrel, I 100% wouldn't be offended like, it's just a fancy dress

>> No.10678585

>>10678582
Who tf wants handmaidens take at their wedding kek

>> No.10678593

>>10674726 Is way more appropriate for a wedding.

>>10677431 would be insane, and literally looks like some busted Ren faire trash. Not to mention the white/gold and attempt at OTT. Luckily it's some nerd's D&D wedding but if it was a normies wedding, it wouldn't fly.

>> No.10678623

>>10678585
wut

>> No.10678639

>>10678581
What's your point? I work with normies. My friends aren't normies. Being intelligent is the capability to be flexible and adapt in multiple environments.

Have fun working a minimum wage job the rest of your life.

>> No.10678647

>>10678639
Lmfao there's plenty of high paying jobs that don't give a shit about what you wear
Cope and seethe

>> No.10678659

>>10678576
she's not fat but definitely slightly chubby.
oR she is squishing her arms and it makes them bigger than they are because of the flab.

>> No.10678660

>>10678577
Fatties with very short hair are a special breed of tragic

>> No.10678662

>>10678647
How is having normie friends even an insult? Oh no, I don't restrict my friends to my niche hobby! What a bizarre mindset. You sound like some kind of hyper-obsessed autist.

People can have multiple passions, and their passions can co-exist. Do you think Misako is going to give up her fulfilling career in nursing just because she can't wear frilly dresses to work?

>> No.10678665

>>10678662
They probably are an autist. Unrealistic expectations about the world as well. This hobby attracts mentally ill people.

>> No.10678668

>>10678576
I think she just unfortunately has bad skin genetics so her skin is saggy and makes her looks fatter than she would if her skin was normal. Her facial skin also looks prematurely aged for a 24 year old with her prominent nasolabial folds and laugh lines.

>> No.10678673

>>10678001
Yeah I have the same thing in my comm desu, it’s why I kinda just prefer wearing lolita out on my own being out with rainbow coloured freaks just draws even more attention

>> No.10678706

>>10678576
Wait why piss chan? Is there a story here?

>> No.10678709

>>10678673
Y’all got self confidence issues. Jeez. Imagine surrounding yourself with uglies to try and look half decent.

>> No.10678712

>>10678370
Kek. It’s actually an offensive appropriation of my grandmas Davenport.

>> No.10678714

>>10678706
She posted a picture of herself pissing in the street in lolita

>> No.10678730

>>10678579
Atleast they have the decency to cover it. Remember kitchen chan

>> No.10678731

>>10678714
Ahhhhh wtf gross.

>> No.10678747

>>10678585
are you retarded? this dress would be fine for a wedding unless you’re the type of trash that wears cocktail dresses to weddings

>> No.10678807
File: 82 KB, 640x853, yxojqwfuhgp71.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10678807

>> No.10678809

>>10678662
being a normie has nothing to do with your career dumbass

>> No.10678935
File: 885 KB, 1125x1333, BB321F15-D5F3-4DDF-960A-1CCE2C0AA933.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10678935

I'm sorry mom but what is this

>> No.10678936

>>10678809
No one said we were normies. We're talking about having normie friends and working jobs in normie clothes. Can you read?

>> No.10678963

>>10678935
>The gold shoes
Please no

>> No.10678970

>>10678747
nayrt but most weddings are cocktail attire anyway. >>10678582 looks more like something that would be more appropriate for work, a funeral, or church.

>> No.10678976
File: 654 KB, 3000x1996, B151AA74-D45D-44A5-A722-70BC7EC710C0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10678976

>>10677843
>scrotes
Sugoma anus

>> No.10678977

>>10678668
Her instagram mention a joint disorder, and pretty sure she’s lost a lot of weight recently. That’s a common way to have excess skin

>> No.10678980

>>10678977
Joint disorder hints at possible issues with collagen. Which affects skin too depending on the type.

>> No.10678999

>>10678731
And called that A CHALLENGE with a #pisslita tag

>> No.10679000

>>10678709
Did you even read what I fucking said lol

>> No.10679002

>>10678970
Wow, guess what, weddings are held in churches. Stop policing wedding wear for christ's sake, it all depends on the specific wedding what's appropriate and what's not, and we all agree being an ita isn't appropriate.

>> No.10679006

It's ironic that the most mentally ill lolitas itt are the ones calling everyone else mentally ill. I'm glad all our hypothetical family and friend event coords are living rent free in your head.

>> No.10679007
File: 821 KB, 1022x1432, image6-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10679007

>>10678581

>> No.10679009

>>10678999
You all continue to take the bait

>> No.10679010

>>10679009
You say this like she wasn’t the one who embarrassed herself and made softcore porn for all to see

>> No.10679024

>>10678578
Thats true. Usually doing anything that could be seen as taking attention away from the bride is considered rude. I remember when I was a bridesmaid for my brother's wedding my mom made me re-dye my hair from bleach blonde back to my natural brown because she made a big stink that it was "too loud and might draw attention from the bride". People can get really worked up about weddings.

>> No.10679026

>>10678935
She looks fine though?

>> No.10679076

>>10679026
None of the items go together. Gold shoes are formal, dress is casual footage vibes and the blue hat is ott sweet. ITA

>> No.10679079

>>10679024
Exactly. I guess this thread really shows how dull and self centered some gulls are. Lolita, even toned down lolita, attracts a lot of attention and you look like an attention seeking baby when you wear it to other types of events.

>> No.10679092

>>10679026
for real anon? each thing she's wearing could have literally been picked at random

>>10679024
>>10679079
i agree that lolita could be tacky at a wedding but what the fuck? dying your hair back to brown for a wedding is ridiculous, at some point you have to think these people are insane

>> No.10679113

>>10678576
her arms aren't even fat you autist she's squishing them on her side off course it's gonna look bigger when you do that

>> No.10679131

>>10679076
The ”hat” is just mickey mouse ears you wear at Disneyland and are definitely not ott sweet, wtf. The shoes are a weird choice yeah, but not enough to make the whole outfit ita. It’s not even lolita to begin with, more like otome/pink house style.

>> No.10679180

>>10679131
Like the other anon said, everything she's wearing looks like it could have been picked at random. None of it goes together at all

>> No.10679195

>>10679092
Oh bridezillas are insane. This one chick removed a bridesmaid for getting cancer and going bald because she didn’t think her baldness would fit the aesthetic.

>> No.10679197

>>10679113
If anything she has muscles

>> No.10679225
File: 340 KB, 1080x1352, Screenshot_20210928_213948.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10679225

>> No.10679226
File: 267 KB, 1009x1350, Screenshot_20210928_213934.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10679226

>>10679225

>> No.10679229
File: 528 KB, 1080x1069, Screenshot_20210928_213919.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10679229

>>10679226

>> No.10679230
File: 419 KB, 1080x1301, Screenshot_20210928_213906.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10679230

>>10679229

>> No.10679271

>>10679131
None of the items match or are cohesive. Terrible outfit even by normie standards

>> No.10679275

>>10679230
What was this shot with a potato

>> No.10679284

>>10679230
damn she tried to do a xxdollxx edit but failed so horribly. this looks awful

>> No.10679292

>>10679284
She can't even dress herself.
No shocker she can't edit either.

>> No.10679384

>>10679230
Creepy shooped face

>> No.10679477

>>10678935
>>10678963
>>10679076
>>10679092
>>10679180
>>10679271
Only edgelords and newbs post Misako to the ita thread. Next.

>> No.10679489

>>10679477
To be fair it is ita. I don’t give a shit if it’s her or not.

>> No.10679494

>>10678935
Considering the ears, it seems to be a Disneybound sort of outfit. Not sure which character though.

>> No.10679508

>>10679494
Maybe Daisy Duck? Lavender dress and blue bow.

>> No.10679513

>>10679477
Only simps think just because you're *celebrity status* means you're incapable of dressing poorly

>> No.10679514

>>10679494
>>10679508
It's not. All she did was go to a hotel.

>> No.10679540

>>10679513
Look at how your symbol has fallen!

>> No.10679665

>>10679229
What a weird pose/location

>> No.10679708

>>10679002
Sorry you’ve never been to a secular wedding :^)

>> No.10679828

>>10679226
I hate e-girl-litas with a burning passion

>> No.10679948

>>10677665
it hurts to see moitie worn this way ugh

>> No.10680034
File: 285 KB, 1080x1943, FB_IMG_1632946977658.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10680034

>> No.10680037

>>10679508
>>10679514

She's wearing Haunted Mansion themed ears after The Bride, and she visited a hotel for dinner. Welcome to living life as a daily lolita, sometimes you don't match 100% and it is fine

>> No.10680070

>>10679002
I've been to a dozen or so weddings in my life, less than half of them were in churches.

>> No.10680088

>>10680070
This.
My sister's was on a fucking beach and my cousin's is going to be at a country club.

>> No.10680089
File: 59 KB, 1224x765, d7f65cb471c6c95c100fa9a3c5d788487ab0c876 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10680089

>>10680034
mfw I see one more moitié ita

>> No.10680109
File: 381 KB, 1638x2560, revolve-wedding-guest-dresses-scaled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10680109

>>10678747
>unless you’re the type of trash that wears cocktail dresses to weddings

What the fuck anon, cocktail attire is normal wedding attire but it largely depends on the wedding. It depends on the venue and most guest invitations will give you a color scheme to obey or tell you if the reception is casual, formal, cocktail or garden party.

pic related is normal wedding guest attire.

>> No.10680111
File: 177 KB, 922x1024, wedding-922x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10680111

>>10680109

so something >>10678582 like this would be appropriate for a fall or winter wedding, but the dark colors and high neckline would look out of place at a summer or spring wedding, especially if it is outdoors, where something like >>10680109 would be expected.

>> No.10680112
File: 131 KB, 426x590, classic3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10680112

>>10680111
what makes lolita seem more formal to normies is that most dresses these days are bodycon, with mild flare and minimal poof. big poofy dresses are associated with extravagance, and the long sleeves. At a normie wedding, classic would be passable in some situations but youd struggle with hitting that sweet spot between normie acceptable formal and lolita acceptable.

>> No.10680211

>>10679477
Sorry anon, misako deserves to be on this thread with those mismatched color ears and shoes.

>> No.10680217

>>10680211
Was she even trying to wear lolita though? That's like posting her to the ita thread for pics of her wearing pink house with no petti.

>> No.10680246

>>10680217
Other jfashions are posted to the thread. Like lor's clown looks

>> No.10680249

>>10680246
Lor's clown looks are intended to be lolita. I think Misako just going to Disney in casual clothes being posted here is silly. We know she can dress well and she does. She's just wearing a causal outfit and not a lolita coord. Unless she notes it's supposed to be a specific fashion there's no reason reason post it here. It's the ita thread not the "outfit that isn't matchy matchy" thread. Otherwise we'd just post non famous lolitas in here for most matched normie outfits that appear on their feed when they go camping or whatever.

>> No.10680253

>>10680034
The ability to make moitie look THIS fugly is incredible

>> No.10680255

>>10680089
>>10680034
It’s the same coord just a different shot. So ugly wtf is the bustier thing and why wear it with the white obijime and choker? Looks so unflattering

>> No.10680264

>>10680255
It's Moitie's Rose Jacquard Corset
she tried coording it sorta how it's modelled and just failed miserably

>> No.10680267

>>10680249
She isn't going to Disney. Why the fuck do people keep saying that. Just look at her insta. She dressed like this for a fucking hotel tea

>> No.10680269

>>10680211
In what fucking world are gold shoes mismatched with any color. They're an ita magnet in lolita, but gold shoes are just as neutral as black and brown in normie fashion. You're openly admitting you can't dress yourself. Most embarrassing behavior.

>> No.10680270

>>10680269
lolitas are allergic to using neutrals as neutrals

>> No.10680271

>>10680267
Was it a lolita dress code event tho? The point is she's wearing it to just live life it's not a lolita cord clearly or supposed to be.

>> No.10680272

>>10677086

>> No.10680277

>>10678935
She didn't even tag the coord as lolita anyways. Not everything she posts is lolita newfag.

>> No.10680283

>>10680277
This. Someone saw Misako in a slightly weird casual fit and thought they did something by posting her here kek

>> No.10680303

>>10677444
Every time I see her hair, it makes my skin crawl. It looks like she uses piss as shampoo.

>> No.10680310

>>10680283
>>10680277
Jfashion "itas" are posted in this thread all the time newfags. It doesn't have to be lolita

>> No.10680321
File: 41 KB, 514x960, FB_IMG_1632811440470.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10680321

>> No.10680329

>>10680269
Imagine thinking that gold shoes go with everything. You're openly admitting that you have no taste.

>> No.10680333

>>10680269
lolita neutrals are different from normie neutrals.
Not a hard concept.

>> No.10680355
File: 1.72 MB, 1316x2097, im8xozvx1eq51.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10680355

>> No.10680356

>>10680310
Is everything Misako wears labeled jfashion just because she's Japanese? It is a bit of an unspoken rule that jfashion means alt Japanese fashion, not a random maxi dress that's barely a step up from normie. The brand is not a lolita brand even. Also we rarely post jfashion it's anymore. It's all cof it's and obvious sissies/ig girls trying to be "the other" lolita these days.

>> No.10680357

>>10680321
im glad she got posted, it was so hard not to straight up tell her she looks like shit

>> No.10680360
File: 434 KB, 1080x1078, Ita.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10680360

>>10680310
She's just wearing slightly cuter normie clothes, it's like posting lolitas who are in their regular clothes here. It's not relevant at all, cope harder newfag.
>>10680356
I agree, anon is fucking dumb.
Contributing some actual itas for content.

>> No.10680371

>>10680333
She's not wearing lolita dipshit

>> No.10680516

>>10680360
What makes this ita? Is it the sneakers?

>> No.10680527

>>10680360
They're fatties but other than that, all I see is nitpicks. Sneaker-chan does need, at least, better sneakers.

>> No.10680528

>>10680516
All of it looks really bad lmao. Taobao, hamplanet wearing galaxies, one looks handmade.

Half of it is clolita and the other half is western lolita. It looks very "off" from what lolita standardly looks like.

>> No.10680531

>>10680355
This mask is straight out of a horror movie

>> No.10680652

>>10680360
not a fan of galaxy-chan but green-chan is pretty decent

>> No.10680653

>>10680652
The material looks like some weird canvas quilt shit, so I have a hard time thinking that dress looks ok. Something about it looks really weird.

>> No.10680686

>>10680360
Other than the sneakers on Galaxy-Chan, this comes across as really nitpicky.

Like sure, I suspect some of it is handmade so maybe the material isn't the best quality or whatever but I've seen people wearing worse quality from Bodyline or Taobao

Not the best coords I've seen but far from ita, least its not more shit AP clones without coording skills

>> No.10680688

>>10680686
These all look bad, im sorry. Maybe there’s not something technically bad on paper, but the styling is just awful. Its a matter of having taste

>> No.10680695

>>10680688
I just posted the last message

I'd definitely change a few things around like the headpiece on the red coord or remove the beige jacket on Chocolate-Chan in the back etc. but compared to other dumpster-fires posted here this all reads as "meh"

Would I wear any of these? No

Do I really think this is ita? No

It can be a sub par coord without being ita, like I know the material on Green-Chan reads as off but the overpiece kinda reads historical so it makes sense but then the shoes now read as off with a more 1940s-1950s vintage vibe so it's clashing eras

There's lots of improvements you can make but this doesn't make me want to throw my computer out at the end of the day

>> No.10680697

>>10680333
>lolita neutrals are different from normie neutrals.

cgl insists lolita is a fashion yet refuses to let it abide by any fashion rules

>> No.10680721

>>10680697
Nah. We just have a lot of fashion larpers that wear lolita more for cosplay.

See: all the cat ears and consistently themed costume outfits, nowadays.

>> No.10680758

>>10680721
the staunch hate for cat ears even after brands released their own animal ears amazes me

>> No.10680761

>>10680758
Just because a brand releases something doesn't mean it's good. cgl lolitas don't care for animal ears since it leans toward being more of a costume than fashion.

>> No.10680783

>>10680267

She kind of did. The hotel Misako ate at was the Sheraton Grande Tokyo Bay. It's along the Disney monorail line and one of the official hotels. They have a souvenir shop in the lobby and she might have bought the ears there before she went to eat.

>> No.10680837
File: 1.20 MB, 1170x1457, 62B1F901-3171-4194-A791-7C57BBEF74A3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10680837

>seeing this pic liked by a well known lolita

>> No.10680851

>>10680837
Snoop?

>> No.10680868

>>10680837
Passes the sticker test though

>> No.10680878

>>10680837
da da da da daaaa

>> No.10680880

>>10680868
the sticker test is bullshit that uggos use to cope. makeup and hair are part of coords.

>> No.10680883

>>10680880

This.

Also an uggo girl in a nice outfit is very different from this bullshit.

>> No.10680896

>>10680695
Your perception of itas has been warped. They are just badly dressed lolitas. They don't need to make you want to vomit or throw out your computer. They just have to look bad and not capture the Lolita aesthetic.

>> No.10680904

>>10680868
there's no "sticker test" in real life

also no the fuck it doesn't pass

>> No.10680910

>>10680837
I hate seeing males in lolita so fucking

>> No.10680912

>>10680910
*much

>> No.10681014

>>10680910
i like seeing asian femboys in lolita. but any other kind of male, agree

>> No.10681017

>>10680896
Ita means it hurts to look at, it has to be so bad it hurts

>> No.10681018

>>10681017
They are painful to look at because their outfits suck. They don't need to have cat ears and a cosplay outfit to be painfully bad

>> No.10681033

>>10680837
why are lolitas so mean she looks pretty.
look at those bedroom eyes. i want to f**** her so bad.

>> No.10681035

>>10681033
Kill yourself

>> No.10681045

>>10680880
>>10680883
100%

Japanese mags even have makeup and hair coordination and you know what? It's an expectation that your hair and face match your clothes, god damned coping itas.

>> No.10681061

>>10681045
hair and makeup should match but some people are just unattractive looking. i feel like the sticker test is for people who do everything else right or okay but just look ugly enough to bias people's impression of the coord. there should be a fatty equivalent. some fatties look fine and even have dresses that fit but they're so fat that it's hard to think positively of their coords.

>> No.10681064

>>10681061
The sticker test is a bullshit like like >>10680880 claimed

That shit didn't fly and wasn't a thing on cgl 10 years ago. Some seething newfag from the egl community must've gotten posted and coined it. Idgaf, if you're on cgl and you don't have enough standards to understand that you need your makeup and hair done then you're in the wrong fucking place.

>> No.10681075

>>10681064
i agree on the makeup, i said that in my post. some people will look ugly no matter what makeup you do to their face so they may have well done makeup but just be ugly looking. most humans are not that ugly. but enough plus everyone's biases on what's attractive

>> No.10681148

>>10677392
Do you not like the dress? Or do you not like the person? This coord is fine. The Otome Nostalgia coord of hers posted earlier was meh because I don't think that dress really looks good on anyone...

>> No.10681150

>>10678577
Would look better with a non flesh colored blouse and a wig. Maybe no nose ring. But I think this is nice.

>> No.10681151

>>10680837
they always do this pigeon toe pose
it's not cute, it's creepy as hell

>> No.10681154

>>10681148
ntayrt but this dress is ugly clolita shit

>> No.10681159

>>10681154
Eh to each their own I guess? I just didn't know if anon had a problem with the girl in the picture or what. Call me lazy, but I couldn't be bothered to post someone to the ita thread unless I have a personal problem with them.

>> No.10681161

>>10677583
You don't see the tattoo on her arm?
>I wonder who can give them besides the girl herself.
You really can't fathom the idea of someone liking something you don't? Strange paranoia you have but okay.

>> No.10681165
File: 103 KB, 477x960, FB_IMG_1633145972695.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10681165

>> No.10681202

>>10680880
>>10680904
>>10681045
>>10681064
It's been a thing for years, cope. And when you say stupid shit like this, you're just proving that the anons upthread are right and this thread is being used at times to body shame or be terfs instead of critique super bad coords. Get therapy or something.

That being said, >>10680837 has issues, like, what is that bag? The pose is awful, and why are we posing by a dustpan? Not a fan of the plain white tights. That might be a personal taste thing. And even if this were a person w/o facial hair, the weird creepy eyes come off as some kind of attempt at edgy and it looks bad.

>> No.10681206

>>10681159
>i only post vendettas
either you're new or fucking stupid.

>> No.10681208

>>10681159
Ita threads are for laughing and cringing at bad outfits. I couldn't give a fuck who the persona actually is, faces can be censored for all I care. I come here to look at train wreck coords and what not to do.

>> No.10681210

>>10681202
Fuck this. You're and others with this dumb mentality are the reason the comm is so mediocre. Are you too dumb to understand how autistic it is to compartmentalize a coord by removing the person wearing it from the critique? Coords are all about execution, that's why pretty girls always get white knighted for ita shit all the time but no one asks to use the sticker test for that because it's a cope. Critiques are also about how the pieces are being worn. And the point of the thread is to complain about how people make lolita look bad and if the person themselves is making the coord look bad, they are still ita. The coord doesn't exist in a vacuum. The sticker test is only used to spare people's feelings. Trying to pretend that someone's looks, weight, sex, height whatever else have nothing to do with how an outfit actually looks on someone is an issue that has been plaguing the community forever. The sticker test is just like the opposite of shitty flat lays that will look terrible when worn. It's telling people that they can look terrible as long as the outfit is cohesive, which is counter intuitive.

>> No.10681225
File: 182 KB, 937x1694, whatheactualfuck.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10681225

the moitie ita is back with full force
thought last time was bad? ohohohohoho are you in for a rude awakening

>> No.10681230

>>10681208
larper mentality

>> No.10681233

>>10681225
but anon, with better lighting, nice backdrop and a good mannequin this would look totally perfect and wonderful. you just think she's ugly.

>> No.10681236

>>10681225
I can't believe she has a baby that poor poor child has to see *this* every day

>> No.10681238

>>10681233
Low quality b8 m8

>> No.10681239

>>10681233
kek she's ugly AND the coord is a trainwreck
even the sticker test couldn't save this but i guess im just ~bOdY sHaMinG1~ and have issues

>> No.10681243

>>10681230
What am I larping?

>> No.10681250

>>10681035
please yell at me more mommy. i haven't gotten enough from attention lolitas lately.

>> No.10681252

>>10681225
What’s her aversion to a consistent color palette? Pastel and white and black is so ugly all together. The comment about the coat being perfect

Is humorous. Doesn’t work at all

>> No.10681262

>>10681225
Looks like a dumpster diving crackhead

>> No.10681263

>>10681252
Where is the comment? I looked for it and there is nothing

>> No.10681264

>>10681210
But what if people are just ugly looking? Like if you put Lor in a good coord, she still has an unfortunate as fuck face.

Is someone ita because they're ugly even if the rest is well executed?

>> No.10681265

>>10681210
You're just a garbage person looking for excuses to rip on fatties, uggos, and trans. Lolita fashion isn't just for pretty, skinny people, it's for EVERYONE. The fashion doesn't "belong" to you or anyone else and you don't get to police which faces and bodies participate. If a coord is ita, it's ita. If a coord is okay, but a fattie is wearing it, you don't get to add "ita points" because of your gross, mentally ill need to body shame. And I know this board is full of scrotes and larpers, so no one should be taking it seriously anyway, but crap like this and shallow nitwits like (you) are why this board is dying.
>in b4 seethe
You're the one longposting first. (You) seethe.

>> No.10681267

>>10681265
That anon has a stupid take but moralfagging in the ita thread on cgl really ain't it nonnie.

>> No.10681272

>>10681265
>T. Triggered uggo

>> No.10681273

>>10680360
WOW THATS ALOT OF LARD

>> No.10681277

>>10681265
you're an idiot.

btw, cgl is better than lolitas making whole ass livejournal shrines to one ita.

You know what? Ita livejournals were also a thing. Sooo many off shoots of them.

Welcome to lolita, newfag. Don't come on my board and claim anyone is larping in an ita, thread you dumb fuck. If you had your history about you from actually being in the fashion, then you'd know these threads are pretty intertwined with the culture.

>> No.10681282

>>10681265
Fuck off with that fee fee bullshit, faggot. This is 4-fucking-chan. Ironically, it's shit takers like you who are making this board "dIe oMgz"

>> No.10681290

>>10681277
Bad take, ahole. LJ is dead for the same reason. Idiots, midwits, and garbage humans trying to make the fashion unfun for anyone but themselves. Have fun in your sad little board jerking each other off.

>> No.10681358

>>10681263
Hmm did she post multiple places or edit the CoF post? It said something about I’m so glad my DKNY coat matches perfectly and asked who is is into (some acronym I didn’t know)

>> No.10681595

>>10677385
The hair makes it even worse.

>> No.10682932

>>10681202
I like this fashion for the cute feminine aesthetics. A gross hairy man in a wig is not the aesthetic I want to look at and they always look bad and creepy. sorry not sorry.

>> No.10684680

>>10677966
sounds like someones upset they got called out for being an insecure asshole :)