[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 248 KB, 2048x809, 178183_4856217612495_566049579_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6429429 No.6429429[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Venus Angelic Doll Competition Thread

Are you going to enter?
Have you already entered?
What would like to win?
What are the best and worst entries?

>> No.6429440

>>6429429
We still have a thread.

>>6425270

>> No.6429455

>>6429440
That's autosaging.

>> No.6429453

>>6429440

shit, couldn't find it and thought a mod had deleted it again.

>> No.6429489

>>6429453
Even if that one is past bump limit, use the catalog next time you look for a thread.

http://catalog.neet.tv/cgl/

>> No.6429746

Flan entered, not sure if serious entry or not

>> No.6429753

>>6429746
its actually really cute surprisingly. shes pulling really dumb faces but i suppose thats the point eh

shame its taken on a crappy phone

>> No.6429761

who on cgl entered?

charms, spoony, annie, flan, derpqueen, abbie?

i so want dakota to do it

>> No.6429764

>>6429761
Pics? I cbf looking through hundreds of random Photoshopped faces.

>> No.6429765

>>6429761
Pt should enter

>> No.6429776

>>6429764
i wonder how the lady running it is going to handle all the photoshop and multiple entries. since they're ~against the rules~

like, Spoony is technically breaking the rules. you're supposed to only enter 1 look, 1 time, with a collection of photos together.
Flan is clearly photoshopped too, like her facial structure is changed.

my photo isn't up yet. which annoys me. i took the time to PM her and she messages me back but it's not there.

>> No.6429781

>>6429776
Flan posted the raws yesterday, she only changed her nose from what I can see and slightly puffed her cheeks I think

>> No.6429783

>>6429761
oh also Dakota can't enter. like i already said, facial structured shoop is not allowed.

>> No.6429785

>>6429783
but she's ~not~ shooped

>> No.6429789

>>6429781
that's not allowed tho. how hard is it to follow simple rules?

and i don't understand how someone can dislike their face so much that they can't even go without shoop for one photo.

>> No.6429790

>>6429785
oh right, i forgot

>> No.6429792

(Has my name been said 3 times yet? May I enter the thread?)

>>6429776
I only touched the nose(can you blame me?) and the very edges of my face because I'm less gaunt than that irl.
Original: http://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/cgl/thread/S6425270#p6426546
Probably the lighting and angling.

>> No.6429802
File: 192 KB, 800x600, 1325804358940.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6429802

>>6429789
Miyu would fit the criteria. We could trollolol Venus with this pic someone posted in the 1st thread. Someone already trolled her with pics of Valeria and she got all buttmad. =D

>> No.6429799

>>6429753
>>6429746

I would shit myself repeatedly if spoony won something and flan won nothing.
That would just be golden.

>> No.6429805
File: 1.01 MB, 2048x1536, new pt 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6429805

>>6429802
naw miyu is cool don't use her to troll venus. use pixyteri. seriously somebody do it.

>> No.6429804

It's against the rules to draw on your entry so Flan is already disqualified.

I messaged Lily earlier about cheaters and she is taking the rues seriously.She is apparently going to clean up all the disqualified entries soon and move them onto a new album.

>> No.6429810

>>6429792
idk lady
i just am a stickler for rules, there was stuff i saw in my photo i would have liked to edit. some shine, a few blemishes, but if it says no editing but lighting- no editing but lighting it is.

>> No.6429813

>>6429804
oh cool. i saw a lot of people with drawn on photos and i was like "i wanted to draw on my photos..."

>> No.6429811

>>6429805
OR we could just convince PT to dress herself up like a doll and enter herself....

>> No.6429819

>>6429802
If shoop isn't allowed then plastic surgery shouldn't be allowed either. Yes I know she's gorgeous but it's still not natty. >:|

>> No.6429824

>>6429804
>>6429799
That's fine. The pics are from May 2012 so no real effort went into it. I didn't read the rules because I don't expect anything from it. Just a bit of fun.

>>6429789
It's not about dislike. II liked how I looked but I don't think gaunt = dolly. I didn't realise absolutely no photoshop was allowed. I got that impression that shoop was fine from http://archive.rebeccablacktech.com/cgl/thread/S6421145#p6422916

If you'd like, I can resubmit the unshooped photos as a plain collage?

>> No.6429826

>>6429819
no no no that's silly. along those lines makeup, wigs, hair extensions, anything other than natural you shouldn't allowed.

it's just that shoop can achieve things that can't ever happen IRL, makeup and plastic surgery can only take your body so far.

>> No.6429838

>>6429824
you should ~ otherwise you'll just be removed.
i need to tell Spoony too. i didn't realize it was anything more than airbrushing.
but if /i/ noticed the photoshop a person who edits for a living sure as fuck will be able to ~

>> No.6429842

>>6429824

But you don't expect to win so leave your shooped, drawn on entries up.

Just a bit of fun afterall.

>> No.6429848

I know that changing features are not allowed, but what about putting on a filter and stuff?

>> No.6429855

>>6429848
changing lighting is allowed. i think as long as the filter doesn't change features and only like makes a photo more clear, less blurry, or smooths stuff out it's fine. a good camera would do that for sure, anyway.

>> No.6429861

>>6429838
> if /i/ noticed the photoshop a person who edits for a living sure as fuck will be able to
She doesn't edit as a living, it's just a hobby. Apparantly she's a pharmacy student.

I talked to her a little and she seems nice enough though.

>> No.6429862

>>6429842
It'll get deleted, so I may as well do it properly if they're actually enforcing the rules.

>>6429838
She went into detail about the face/nose modifications but I can't remember where.

The issue with the judge is that her photos were shooped, and with a lot of visible errors. If the contest is about achieving the look without shoop, it's setting such a poor/embarassing example.

>> No.6429867

>>6429862
i didn't really look at her photos, i don't think i ever even opened them non-thumbnail.

i am kind of laughing at the no shoop rule. like, Venus's photos are 60-80% photoshopped every single time.

>> No.6429877

I've spoken to Lily and she said she wasn't really clear about the rules and she is going to be making revisions to them. There isn't an exclusive no-shoop rule, the rule is no "excessive" Photoshop. You are allowed to do things like remove blemishes or fix the lighting, just don't go overboard and paint over your nose and shit.

>> No.6429884

>>6429877
how is this not clear?

>Light adjustments are allowed
>do not alter the makeup or colours of the photo, do not use photoshop to alter your features
>Do not draw on your face in any photos this only obscures the view of the photograph


sounds more like too many people broke the rule so she's changing it.

>> No.6429887

>>6429776
I don't think she is going to post them, because I messaged it to her too, and that was 2 days ago. I think the point of messaging to her is that you don't want it on the wall.

I was hoping that she would post it for me as well, the reason I don't post it myself is that I have some friends that I don't want to show my posts too...

>> No.6429897

>>6429887
oh really?

i guess, it doesn't say it's a voting thing. so they must just pick the winners.

>> No.6429914
File: 1.40 MB, 1200x1200, collage1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6429914

>>6429884
I stand by that my other one was a lot more fun, but here's unshooped except lighting changes. Horrendously bad but I have no access to Photoshop.

>> No.6429931

>>6429914
it went really blurry

>> No.6429938

>>6429914
i like this more, set up wise.

>> No.6429942

>>6429914
Doing it right. Kudos for no shoop.

>> No.6429954

>>6429942
Thank you.

>>6429938
Yeah, it's a lot clamer but the website ruined the result quality. And there's no cute aliens.

>> No.6429969

>>6429914
lmao you're hideous so don't even bother trying

>> No.6429971

>>6429914
nicely done but would have liked to see more if there were more

>> No.6429976

>>6429969
Feel free to enter and put me to shame.

>> No.6429984

>>6429914 >>6429914 >>6429914


fatty hiding the fat, nice.

>> No.6429996

It'll be really funny if a seagull wins this contest considering all the shit talking about Venus and her mother that goes on in the living doll threads.
I sent in an entry, but I don't think that I have the type of look they're going for. I'll let /cgl/ know if otherwise.
Charms, I think you're absolutely beautiful but I don't know if your style really says 'doll' so much as 'harajuku / gyaru'--I would've liked to see what you looked like with darker hair and less trendy accessories.
Flan, your look is cute but next time maybe try going outside and taking pictures in natural light? Something other than that grey corridor behind you in these. I also think that you should try some more expressive poses, like maybe a picture in yourself in a cute chair or something. There's just not enough personality showing to make you stand out.
Spoony looks like the weeaboo you'd want to waifu.
that is all.

>> No.6430020

>>6429996
agree with all except charms reminds me more of pastelgoth than gyaru, flan will never be good looking, and spoony is nowhere near waifu material unless you mean the hick-stay-at-home-eat-all-your-food-yell-at-her-7-kids waifu.

>> No.6430031

>>6429996
thanks so much. and really? hmm, oh well.

>>6430020
ew i hate pastel goth
i didn't even think of that
fuck

>> No.6430040

>>6430020
Her eye-makeup is very definitely gyaru to me. The droopy-eye thing is kind of a hallmark, in my opinion.

>> No.6430041

>>6430040
i tried to do it big though to make it more like doll instead of gyaru
i guess i should have done it like more all the way around or something.

>> No.6430173

>>6430041
I mean, there's definitely crossover between the two.
it might also just be the photo, because it's not a head-on angle the gap between your waterline and eyeliner on the left eye looks very pronounced, but angles would probably camouflage this if it weren't from a three-quarters view. I remember you said something once about Dakota using a similar technique in some of her video tutorials.
I wish I wasn't on a laptop so I could upload specifically the picture I'm thinking of when I say 'droopy eye thing'. I know that's kind of vague.

>> No.6430179

>>6430041

as much as I hate admitting this, I think spoony has the right idea. Her backdrop sucks and her photos are drab as hell, but her makeup and expressions are doll-like without being too OTT.
maybe try looking at some pictures of BJD for inspiration?

>> No.6430180

>>6430173
i couldn't get a decent head on shot. i would have rather had a head on but it was 11:30, i wanted to take the makeup off already. i like legit spent over an hour trying to get the lighting to work with me to get full face- but it only lit half my face so i had to just deal with it.

but i'll be honest, i haven't seen anyone i feel is "prettier" than me in the submissions. that's so vain fuck i'm sorry.

>> No.6430187

>>6430179
i personally didn't think literal doll would work as well. i thought kawaii uguu ~living doll~ would

i've done straight doll makeup, flawless dewy skin, blank eyes, huge lashes, expressionless and it looks really boring without a good set up and pose. like remember Dakota's where they actually put joints on her? it still looked weird.

to me, Spoony's photos are cute- but you wouldn't know what she was going for without the contest being mentioned. and i think of that as a negative draw back, you should know the point of the photo just by looking at it.

>> No.6430188
File: 305 KB, 835x1273, 1320424234455.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6430188

>>6430173

Like this?

>> No.6430193

>>6430180

It's not vain, it's just confidence, and it's something most people are repelled by these days.
Maybe try taking your pictures outside in the sunlight, that will give you plenty of beautiful, soft lighting.

>> No.6430201

>>6430193
i would have, but i really doubt i would have even entered if i hadn't done it right when Spoony told me about it.

i entered for lolz, if i don't win i don't care. none of the prizes are anything i'd want anyway

>> No.6430241

>>6430187
you definitely have the upper hand in any looks-based competition, which is what I meant with my suggestion earlier. simplicity emphasizes your natural beauty in a way that none of the heavily made up/accessorized kawaii uguu tumblrchans can compete with. also venus is known for having a very sweet/natural doll look; since I'm assuming that she and her moms are the real judges of this contest, I think they'll look for someone who emulates that.
>>6430188
thanks! this isn't the exact tutorial I was thinking of, but it's the same principle. c:
.

>> No.6430248 [DELETED] 

After lurking and glancing at the contestants, I had to shake my head at most of it. The judges are near useless, seeing as nearly 90% of the girls are heavily Photoshopping their pictures or making suspicious FB with possible stolen pictures.

It makes me want to hold my own contest. With prizes people actually want. Though, I've retired from modeling. I have a good deal of connections and could gather decent prizes. Contacts, Hi-end cosmetics and I could get my hands on Korean wigs and cosmetics. It would be judged fairly, people would submit a normal picture time-stamped and then 1-2 pictures done up and make a collage. Nothing overly shopped.

Anyone interested? I could make it worldwide.

>> No.6430257 [DELETED] 

>>6430201
I like your entry, it was well done.

>> No.6430267

>>6430248

I would be very interested, not just soI could try and win shit either. It would be fun to see people entering into more competitions like this, even though a lot of the doll entries are crappy I love the diversity.

>> No.6430295

I'm probably going to enter this. Does anyone have any tips for making freckles stand out in a photo?

>> No.6430307

>>6430241
thanks, i guess we'll see ~

>>6430248
uhm everyone is
plz do

>>6430257
and thank you ~

>>6430295
stand out in a dolly way? draw them on, dots all over your face. focusing on your nose and cheeks.

>> No.6430313

>>6430180
maybe in makeup with angles and wigs you think you look 'pretty' but Ive seen your natural photo and i find it really, well, disgusting for you to say you feel that you're the prettiest. you slather on a fair bit to change your whole appearance. i dont have a problem with what you do or how you look but that comment is really low

>> No.6430316

>>6429954
>>6429954
please kill yourself already, horseface. you're still shitting up this board?

>> No.6430317 [DELETED] 

>>6430267
Thank you for the reply. I've been wanting to host a decent contest for a while now, it would be done in a month because anything longer would just drag on and people would begin to lose interests. Another thing that annoys me, is the prizes! I honestly have so much beauty products, I had to insure it for 45 grand and that is not even an exaggeration. Every year, I give away makeup on holidays, all brand new and still in packages. I used to get a lot of products as perks when I did model. I sometimes still get things in the mail from people I've befriended in the fashion community.

I have a whole tray of contacts, makeup (Urban Decay, Makeup Forever, Benefit, Stila, Lancome, Tokidoki, Fresh and much more) and I can get my hand on any Asian cosmetics I want. Also Korean wigs (I prefer them over the Japanese brands).

Any other takers?

>> No.6430319

>>6430307
No, I meant real freckles. I should have said that. Sorry.

>> No.6430320

>>6430317
How do you end up with so much makeup and shit (just curious)? Do you do reviews for a magazine or something?

>> No.6430321

>>6430317
I'd consider it, but I'd want more details and stuff before I commit.

>> No.6430327

>>6430319
i know what you mean, but if you want "dolly skin" you'll need a fair bit of coverage. i wore nearly a full face of high coverage concealer + high coverage powder and i still had flaws peaking thru. it's better, especially in this, to use fake freckles if you want to use that as a gimmick.

>>6430317
all from being in modeling? what did you do and how can i get it?

speaking of like, contest-y give aways i realize i have a lot of stuff i don't need and is too much a hassle to sell. mostly kawaii crap i liked when i went through my "let's try sweet lolita phase" plus people would give me shit because ~it's totally japanese which means she likes it~

>> No.6430329

>>6430313

Why do you have a problem with the fact that somebody doesn't hate the way they look? If she is that comfortable in her own skin then more fucking power to her, I wish I could feel that way about my appearance.

How many of you really love yourselves? Why is loving yourself treat like a problem here? Is it jealousy because you don't have the same confidence?

>> No.6430331

>>6430327
i meant to finish that with
>what kind of contest would you be interested in if you got to make up your own. any ideas, something more interesting than just "like this post" but also more different than "submit photos and i'll pick a winner"

>> No.6430334

that fug fatass bitch lacetreasures entered lolol

>> No.6430335

>>6430329
ignore the troll. i legit said in my post that i feel like i'm the prettiest out of the bunch, and that i recognized that it was a vain thing to say.

>> No.6430336

>>6430327
I wasn't really planning on using it as a gimmick. I just like my freckles.

>> No.6430341

>>6430317

Gimme gimme gimme
But yeah, the prizes kind of do suck, especially those horrendous dresses. I'm only really entering so I can win some free shit, specifically the lilac wig or blue contacts.

>> No.6430342

>>6430336
oh. in that case... idk, the only way to let them show through is to use a very low coverage foundation or whatever.

>> No.6430343

>>6430329
....
>i dont have a problem with what you do or how you look

The issue is that she's saying she feels the prettiest, yet she wears a shitton of makeup and clearly has a lot of practice.

Rephrasing to maybe 'I feel like I've done myself up prettier than the rest' or 'prettiest with makeup on' would really change things.

>> No.6430347

>>6430329
anons saying theres no issue with her saying that, only with her not taking into consideration how much slap shes wearing

and being vague, i guess

>> No.6430355

>>6430180
Are you entering with the blonde wig photo from the other thread?

It was nice but really blurry so its unfair to say you feel youre prettiest if you cant show the goods. Maybe you did the best look in person, and that's fine, but unfortunately it's an online competition.

>> No.6430357

>>6430343

I don't see the issue either way. Maybe she does feel like she's prettiest with or without makeup, I just don't see a problem with it and I don't understand why you would either.
She's comfortable with her appearance, I want to know why that is such a bad thing.

>> No.6430360

>>6430343
i didn't feel like i had to clarify it was a makeup thing. to me, this is a makeup competition.

i don't feel like i am the prettiest girl naturally in the competition, i have no idea what they look like.
but with that said i wouldn't trade faces with any of them.

>> No.6430363

>>6430355
it's because i resized it on tinypic and not on like- my editor. my editor was being a cunt so i had to just shut it down.

the one i sent her isn't blurry.

>> No.6430368

>>6430360
>i don't feel like i am the prettiest girl naturally in the competition, i have no idea what they look like.

This is what I meant. Crisis averted.

>> No.6430370 [DELETED] 

>>6430320
I grew up with a Tiger mom, wanted me to do everything I possibly could. I got scouted as a child and did commercials and catalogs. Later on, runway. I think the best advice I got was to be nice and friendly. It kept me in the good books with a lot of photographers, MUA's and Stylists etc. I got free products from promotional work, gifts bags or invited to IMATS to do booth-girl stuff and would get free products. So, it accumulates.

>>6430321
Of course. I would be your standard contest I suppose. Beauty mostly and not necessarily a doll contest unless any of you specified otherwise. I would make it run 3-4 weeks max. You would have to submit in collage form, a plain picture with a timestamps to prove this is actually you and then 1, 2 or even three pictures of you done up in one look. The choice of how many pictures you want to submit is up to you, as long as you don't go over 3. No heavy photoshop, but small retouching is allowed. I can pick another anon to help as a secondary judge. The winner would be the results of both judges and also the public to an point. The contest would be world wide of course, so it would be fair to everyone. If everyone was comfortable, make a FB account with a picture of myself, maybe even video so people know I'm a real person myself.

>> No.6430371

>>6429802
Ugh I would mutilate kittens to look like this. -.-;
>>6430180
I actually agree with you except I think Spoony is equally as pretty as you are. You both stand out compared to the other entries.

>> No.6430379

>>6430371
no disrespect to Spoony at all, but her look isn't like what i find "pretty". she's a pretty girl but not in the way i find things to be pretty.

idk how to explain it more, like i recognize her attractive-ness but it isn't something i would choose to like... like say i want in a hair competition - i wouldn't pick her as my model. she's very soft looking, very pretty for that kind of this.
like a good example is like, Chokelate is what i find pretty. that very harsh bone structured look.

>> No.6430380

>>6430370

How many winners would you pick then? Like one big ones and then 9 runners up or something?
I really want some free expensive makeup haha, I would be all over this.

>>6430371

Eh, maybe if I lost some weight idk. I look really bad in candids but okay-ish when I take my own pictures, but I tend to believe the candids so I think I look dog ugly most of the time. I do wish I had her confidence though.

>> No.6430381
File: 398 KB, 2560x1920, sLSRx.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6430381

>>6429761
I ENTERED but I'm a nobody so it's OK

>> No.6430382

>>6430380
work with your face, stop trying to look like korean wifu's and shit.

>> No.6430384

>>6430371
Spoony's photoshopped hers though, and a fair bit. Have you seen it non-photoshopped, nonblurry and over several angles?
She's mild-shooped 'oh I took this and didnt even shoop it' photos before, so I don't even know what to trust.

>> No.6430388
File: 33 KB, 400x600, tumblr_lvviukFxIs1r1u48yo1_400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6430388

>>6430379

No disrespect at all. I want to look like Krysten Ritter anyway and I'm like, miles off being any where near so I think I'm pretty fuggo haha

I think I'm going to try and copy her eyebrows, but maybe it's just her features that make it work. I'm 100% jello.

>> No.6430389

>>6430381
adorbz
i would love to see a full body like "cowgirl" pose.
cowgirl doll is a good twist.

>> No.6430392

>>6430388
STOP COPYING OTHER PEOPLE STOP IT
stop it Spoony
stop it
until i started working with my own face doing what i liked and not trying to copy other people i was thought to be like mildly-cute but nothing special
now look at me

again wow so fucking vane but this time like legit

also her eyebrows are such a mess ew

>> No.6430395

>>6430381
>those pupils
Not sure if dilated or poor shooping
>those eye whites
Just...why? It would have looked better before.
>dat airbrush
Contrasts too much with the sharper parts. Makes the photo blurrier than it is.

I'd recommend using way less shoop. What's the original look like? I'm inclined to think you don't need to shoop it at all, personally, except lighting at most if the original was too dark...

>> No.6430396

>>6430381

You're my everyBODY gurl

>>6430384

What, I really didn't photoshop them that much apart from the lighting, I just took an ass-load of photos, over 100 and selected the ones I looked best in. The unshooped picture I posted really is 100% unshooped, check the exif if you don't believe me because it would say. It just has my phone details.

>> No.6430400 [DELETED] 
File: 28 KB, 377x527, 15729_100276976678262_4836833_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6430400

>>6430370
I'm not sure if anyone might remember me. I'll post up a picture. I submitted an entry in the CGL Idol contest and later revoked my entry.

The picture of me isn't flattering or a professional head shot....nor is there any real makeup on save for some lipgloss and a swipe of purple liner. So sorry in advance.

>>6430327
If you haven't been scouted from 12-13-14 and are over the age of 17, you have missed the window. So sorry, I don't mean to sound rude! I'm not saying there aren't exceptions to that, but its very rare. It's not just about being thin, it's about the transformation. Some models have a natural ideal beauty, some...you wouldn't look twice at them. But, slap on some makeup, hair and have a great stylist and presto!

>> No.6430403

>>6430400

>dem full lips
>dat perfect ski-slope nose
>dose beautiful almond eyes

You hit the jackpot girl.

>> No.6430408 [DELETED] 

>>6430380
I could do one grand winner and 2 runners up. I'm going to add some Tonymoly, The Faceshop, Skinfood and Edtude House to this as well.

>> No.6430409

>>6430400
no worries, i'm 5'4 anyway.
i can get free shit from working backstage, already have on few times. but can't wait to get into it fully to get it like you did.

i prefer to do the second part anyway. especially hair extension work. hair really make or breaks it for me.

>> No.6430414
File: 1008 KB, 800x600, original.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6430414

>>6430389
The dress wasn't very cowgirl but it did lead to an investigation as I had no idea about it. Turned out to be a 1950's Fredericks of Hollywood dress. The inventor of the push-up bra!

>>6430395
Trust me it did. Had a bad case of the fat face going on and some imperfections. Pic related

>> No.6430411

>>6430396
You detailed your shoops in the last few days as shoulders, nose and other stuff. You gave quite a bit of descriptions on the shoops.

exif data doesn't prove anything - you can use a mobile to change the data, and I'm very much sure you already know this.

>> No.6430422

>>6430420
Thing is, dolls aren't realistic are they?

>> No.6430420

>>6430414
You look so much better unshooped in comparison! I can see why people would like the shooped photo, but the unrealistic-ism of it just put me way off of it and people will know. Tiny adjustments, maybe, but you did a bit too much (sorry if I sound rude, I don't mean to!).

Remember that the amount of adjustments you made would probably be inappropriate in accordance with the rules. I know that others on there photoshopped their pics, but I think a fair few will be removed.

I hope, at least. It's a makeup and outfit contest, not shoop contest. I'd hate to see people losing out because they stuck to the rules :\

>> No.6430423

>>6430411

Yeah, I said I pulled my shoulders down, fixed a small bump in the ridge of my nose, fixed the lighting and my false eyelash.

The unshoop I posted had all that shit left in, including my horrible face acne. If you want to believe that I look like a 300lb whale or whatever or that I'm going out of my way to shoop every single pictures of me then okay, I'm just saying.
I still have an assload of the untouched pictures, but you've already seen one and if you don't believe me then there's nothing I can do. And no, I didn't actually know you can change the exif data with your phone, but I do now.

>> No.6430427

>>6430422

omg I told you I did a bad job.
I was totally off my game that night, I hated the end product. I was really tired when I was doing it so I did a really shoddy job, you do look more beautiful without it.

Also I'm dying watching this video, watching Ryan instructing you on how to squat in jeans haha

>> No.6430424

>>6430420
I actually have to say I really respect Flan for redoing her pics without the shooping. Obvious that she fixed lighting a bit but at least she stuck within the rules. And she didn't shoop that much to begin with anyway.

Can't say the same for a large part of the other entrants.

Feel free to throw shoes at me now.

>> No.6430428

>>6430411
anon, listen to yourself. you sound so freaking nitpicky and paranoid; by this rationale, no matter what proof she posts, you're just going to justify it with 'you shopped it somehow anyways, you evil mastermind internet wizard, you!'. it's possible to make minor edits to a photo without kotifying yourself. it's not a huge deal and I'd even say it's expected in this contest. chill out.

>captcha: owacky they

>> No.6430429
File: 323 KB, 1024x768, penus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6430429

Think I'm gonna enter pics from that silly idol contest.
Used Meitu for lighting/compilation editing.

Sage for actually considering entering this thing. Although I did have fun in the idol contest

>> No.6430433

>>6430429
That doesn't look doll-like at all, just plain "look how pretty I can be"

>> No.6430439 [DELETED] 

>>6430403
Thank you! No need to sweet me up! ^^;;

I will start making a FB page for this and is anyone interesting in being a judge? I'm currently living in Asia right now (nope don't teach English, lol) and I'm 15-16 hours a head. I wake at 6 am which would be evening time in the US. I'm free from 9am - 4pm my time, because I have to drop my daughter off at Montessori and pick her up.

>> No.6430435

>>6430423
I didn't make any comments about your weight though. There was grilling above about people who did more than just fix lighting, so I don't see why you're allowed to submit liquified photos. You're wiping out features of yourself, even if minor.

Why not just fix lighting, take out the pimples if they're incredibly prominent, and resubmit? Do the right thing. Just a suggestion, obviously, but itd probably give you a better chance of winning.

>> No.6430441

>>6430428
err... they were nitpicking above. why does spoony get special exemption?

>> No.6430447

>>6430441
this

cunt dont care who you are, follow the rules dude...

>> No.6430453

>>6430427
I think you did an excellent job. Also apparently that video showed up on a few other peoples feed lists... Oh dear hah!

>> No.6430455

>>6430439

>yeah, sweeten dat bitch up, then she'll totally give you all that free, expensive makeup

Whelp, you figured me out haha
I'm serious though, just accept the compliments :)

>> No.6430451

>>6430429
>>6430433
agreed
these aren't "dolly" pictures in terms of your hair and make up
I'd also argue that you're showing too much skin

>> No.6430458

>>6429811

>OR we could just convince PT to dress herself up like a doll and enter herself....

Someone tweet her or facebook messgae the link. shouldn't be hard to convince her if you ass kiss like fuck. "sarah, you could win because you're naturally doll like" ect

>> No.6430461

>>6430453

Good, more people need to see this.
It especially cracked me up when I saw Jack quickly skirt a long the floor for some reason.

>> No.6430463 [DELETED] 

Let me make a separate thread for this, instead of rudely hijacking this one, my apologies to OP and the ladies entering this specific contest, it wasn't my intention to derail this thread. One moment...~

>> No.6430462

>>6430447
>>6430423
The original wasn't even that awful. I don't even know what you're going on about with the shoulders. Personally I think you shouldn't hide your features to win a contest based on a fake face.

If I won with my face changed I'd feel like shit because I know I won for a fake face that I don't have. Don't you agree? I get hiding acne, but not fixing other things.

>> No.6430473

>>6430462
agree on shoulders, wtf @ shooping shoulders

spoony the wig is unflattering, real hair would have suited you a lot more as at the moment it does not look connected to your head and wtf @ the fringe

>> No.6430479

>>6430433
>>6430451
Hmmm, I had thought about that. But, eh, these were some ones I had lying around. I also considered entering my Sleeping Beauty cosplay, but I suppose that still isn't doll-like.

I...really didn't think I was showing that much skin, considering it's a knee length dress. But I guess deep down I'm secretly a skank

>> No.6430481

>>6430462

It's just my own personal insecurities. It's not like I completely warped my face, I just removed a small bump and the shoulders I did because I took the image at a wrong angle anyway. I took over 100 pictures but the majority came out blurry and with weird lighting that would change from blue to bright orange. The ones that did come out half decent were all taken at bad angles and that's why I pulled my shoulders down a bit. It's not like I'm lying because it would have looked that way if I'd only taken the shot like an inch higher or something.

I'm going to bed now anyway so I won't be around to argue this, night night Jenn you sexopus. That's half sex, half octopus.

>> No.6430483

>>6430473

I'm not wearing a wig... doesn't look like it's connected to my head? That's my real hair lol, with two ponytail extensions clipped in.

Right, bed now. Seriously.

>> No.6430513

>>6430481
Uh, where does one draw the line then?

There's always going to be a 'Id have looked better if ____!' thought but unfortunately, you are in a contest reflecting skill. If you cant do it naturally, then you werent able to display that skill.

Doesnt matter if you have insecurities or your equipment is faulty or any other excuse. If you didnt get a good enough shot, you didnt get a good enough shot.

Its a really shit attitude to have when many of the contestants didnt resort to liquifying themselves, no matter how small or large the degree.

I don't care the degree, personally I still see it as lying and cheating.

>> No.6430518

>>6430483
seriously? i thought it was a wig...um....awkward...?

>> No.6430546

>>6430392
>again wow so fucking vane but this time like legit
you sound like a vapid twat. Pls stop.

>> No.6430568

>>6430546
this

guess she got the vanity from dakota

would love to see her try and match up without her 10 pounds of confidence boosting makeup on

>> No.6430570

>>6430546
>>6430568
Try not to samefag so much.

>> No.6430575

>>6430400
HEY. I missed you older sister!
inb4neesamaforgotaboutme

>> No.6430582 [DELETED] 

>>6430455
Heh, you clever fox you! =) No, its just a habit. I was taught to accept a compliment and yet decline a compliment in the same breath. Because going the humble route gets you further.

For more information, come to this thread
>>6430576

>> No.6430597

>>6430570
...I was >>6430568 but not >>6430546

what the hell?

>> No.6430599 [DELETED] 

>>6430575
*squeeze* I need to give you my contact info!! I've finally settled down and unpacking, US, then Canada visiting family and now Korea. I haven't been online in a while with all the chaos. Forgives me! I send you a Christmas present. =3

Sorry for spam! My Contest thread over here.
>>6430576

>> No.6430633
File: 58 KB, 506x506, 6232_555708127779817_1173318110_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6430633

oh god...this gurl. i cannot contain all this kawaii uguu HELP

>> No.6430640

>>6430633
also going to add that she looks like a giant baby, so cute <3

anyway i know this is off-topic, but how does one achieve photos like this? is it photoshop or a good camera? i really want to produce stuff like this (be it people, nature, anything)

>> No.6430645

Good lord. I just read through the comments on DerpQueen's entry and that Chyna-Rae chick is so retarded. I can't believe she kept arguing.

>> No.6430653

>>6430645
which one is hers? link?

>> No.6430654

>>6430640
er, won't let me attach pic since it's in the old thread
i mean this though >>6427148

>> No.6430647

>>6430633
Cute, yes. But it's a doll-style contest and all she's wearing is contacts. As a contestant that put a lot of effort in into outfit, hair, makeup, it's a bit insulting. I know religiously she's got it a bit harder, but I've seen people do a lot in religious wear (eg hatsune miku cosplay with headscarf instead of blue hair, or lace headwear).

>buttmad
Yeah a bit. Some people have it so much easier.

>> No.6430659

>>6429914
i hope she wins, especially to anger you guys

considering theres no shoop there, she fits the look
face is a bit too skinny, nose big but everything else is pretty much perfect surprisingly

>> No.6430661
File: 27 KB, 444x556, 480138_120464491445932_869669348_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6430661

>>6430653
It's this picture. Not sure if I can link to facebook without getting a ban.

>> No.6430675

>>6430661
...the...fuck....

>> No.6430683

>>6429914
I actually can't fault it. Definitely could have used better lighting, better surrounding, etc but considering the pics are old and weren't taken for the contest, it's cool that they were still usable.

>> No.6430686

>>6430414
>>6430381

Photoshopped it too much but otherwise cute.

>> No.6430692

>>6430661
Why did she give herself a cleavage rash?

>> No.6430694

>>6430683
this. i request a redo of this look. i know flan now has parted hair? do it anyways

>> No.6430697

>>6430692
>cleavage blush
thatsthejoke.jpg

>> No.6430700 [DELETED] 

>>6430409
That's a pretty good perk. Did you know you can get discounts for working in the industry? I know MUA, people with a cosmetic license, models, ect can get this with proof of course and you get discounts at Makeup forever and Mac to name a few places.

>> No.6430717

>>6430697
Oops sorry, didn't realize it was a joke entry!

>> No.6430729

>>6430717
are you trolling

>> No.6430730

>>6430717
Guess you're just as stupid as the people on the Facebook page.

>> No.6430761

>>6429914
>>6430381
So..is this all cgl has to offer? It's cute, obviously could use some work, but not bad at all. Curious to see more.

>> No.6430780 [DELETED] 

>>6430576

Thread is here.

Mr.Thorns is interested in being the Secondary Judge.

>> No.6430787

>>6429914
Better angling, you!!! Go redo those shots. Your eyes are huge though, omghgmgomg

>> No.6430796
File: 1007 KB, 800x600, Squirtle.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6430796

>>6430761
Honestly. I entered for shits and giggles. I own nothing dolly like at all, let alone have any make up at hand other than mascara and blush.. Eyeshadow? What the fuck is that lol

>> No.6430805

>>6430796
this is supersupersuper cute.
My only suggestion would some sort of a backdrop.
But, gah, this is adorable

>> No.6430841
File: 985 KB, 1920x1280, 012.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6430841

>>6430599
How about for Christmas we get to know each other better? I'll bring the hot peppermint cocoa! I can't wait to hear all your interesting stories! Happy Holidays!

>> No.6430887

flans an ugly cunt and deserves to die
bitch wont win the contest
pathetic
shes ugly fat and has a nose the size of mt everest
biggest nose in existence, ugliest face
how sad

they should allow photoshop just so she can fix that face of hers

>> No.6430894

>>6430805
Thanks, I posted it now for added lulz

>> No.6430900

>>6430887
This so much. She'll never get anywhere in life with that mug and body.

>> No.6430920

>>6430917
>>6430900
>>6430887
Keep going with this samefag. It's entertaining.

>> No.6430917

>>6430887
>>6430887
>>6430887
someone please get rid of her, shes an ugly fuck

>> No.6430944 [DELETED] 

>>6430841
I am a classically trained pastry chef, I can make you delicious-nummy-noms! Oh man...I love the combination of mint and chocolate. Mmmm ~<3

>> No.6430951

>>6430887
her nose could massage my prostate

>> No.6430952

>>6430920
not samefag fuck off flan you abomination

>> No.6430958

>>6430920
Go away Flan. Everyone knows you're the only person here that would ever defend yourself. No one loves you disgusting face.

>> No.6430969

>>6430952
>>6430958
It gets better and better!

And just because I called samefag doesn't mean I'm defending flan.

>> No.6430995

>>6430969
Whatever. Go whack off to her, /fit/fag.

Oh wait, you're Flan.

>> No.6430999

>>6430969
the fact that you arent focusing on her horrendous deformities is enough to show you're on her side

>> No.6431004
File: 35 KB, 300x300, flanfixthat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6431004

>>6430999
>>6430917
>>6430887
>>6430920
>>6430900
>>6430995
>>6430952
>>6430951
>>6430969
>>6430958
>Flan not getting enough attention, so she attacks and then whiteknights herself.

>> No.6431026

>>6429914
Your hair looks so frizzy and dry. Yuck.

>> No.6431029

>>6431004
...uh, i genuinely think shes a horror

>> No.6431032

>>6431004
Flan trying to make it look like her haters dont exist.

>> No.6431073

>>6430479
That's not the issue, so don't try make it out like the other anon was attacking you. They're right. The dress is pretty, it's just not doll-clothing. And you look really nice, but not in the vein of a "leeveeng doll" (which is so stupid, anyways.)

>> No.6431262

>>6429914
this is just... not attracive.
& terrible outfit co ordination.

>> No.6431480

awwww, shit. new entries are up. I wonder which ones are seagulls.

still no spooky, for some reason. ):<

>> No.6431508

>>6431480
If she sent it by pm I don't think it gets added into the entries that we can see.

>> No.6431523

Hey guys, I know I'm not like a guru or anything, but I think a very big key to this whole look is a lot of accessories. My pictures are shitty, but so far I've actually got some really good feedback. You should just raid your drawers and chuck on everything that matches, that's what I did :>

I do have too many accessories though.