[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 65 KB, 480x480, cof.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191448 No.9191448 [Reply] [Original]

New Closet of Thrills thread.

>> No.9191450
File: 194 KB, 960x960, 14368896_10207628471096847_7732683139464587_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191450

>>9191448

>> No.9191451
File: 163 KB, 960x960, 14433004_1822289784684414_6300765628050255064_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191451

>>9191450

>> No.9191452
File: 60 KB, 800x960, 14344151_371181443269604_8395908596052782358_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191452

>>9191451

>> No.9191453
File: 65 KB, 614x960, 14368667_10206622954845672_8191929146744489582_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191453

>>9191452

>> No.9191454
File: 75 KB, 960x960, 14355002_10154584253020798_5019464883778623314_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191454

>>9191453

>> No.9191455
File: 66 KB, 636x960, 14292368_679766192188241_482063204453192243_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191455

>>9191454

>> No.9191457
File: 126 KB, 614x960, 1044148_10155261242474196_1855139995201060761_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191457

>>9191455

>> No.9191459
File: 116 KB, 960x800, 14333743_10205459786213169_2924560541645576187_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191459

>>9191457

>> No.9191461

>>9191448
this is a cute fandom coord. not a fan of the shoes, but i really like it.

>>9191452
THAT IS HOW YOU DO EGA. oh my god it's gorgeous, and modern, not a throwback to 2005.

>>9191454
this is cute too. so many more non-OTT coords that look good seem to be posted lately. i hope the trend continues.

>>9191459
repost or is she just sort of samey?

>> No.9191463
File: 162 KB, 960x960, 14358885_10154590266428619_5838536015099627353_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191463

possibly my favourite coord in a long time
love apples, love the print and bow

>> No.9191464
File: 737 KB, 492x960, aegojfs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191464

this triggers me

>> No.9191473

>>9191463
cute but skirt is kind of flat, no?

>>9191464
definitely not casual. cute though. >>9191463 is much more toward the casual end of the spectrum. did anyone correct her?

>> No.9191486

>>9191452
I love this person's coords so much.

>> No.9191488

>>9191450
Cute smile and nails but everything else is eye cancer.

>>9191452
Perfection.

>>9191451
>>9191457
Please don't make animal ears a new OTT trend. Please.

>> No.9191492

>>9191473
i'd say so but i dont blame her for using a small petti if she was out and about.

>> No.9191508

>>9191452
Absolutely beautiful

>> No.9191547
File: 25 KB, 162x395, 14222312_1214232995265242_4388816795041844447_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191547

>> No.9191548
File: 19 KB, 265x395, 14359155_10207708917784415_5724237845941019355_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191548

>>9191547

>> No.9191549
File: 17 KB, 214x395, 14322319_10155259255012586_3870086876624756765_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191549

>>9191548

>> No.9191550
File: 119 KB, 720x960, 14359035_10207597783479410_2551175474207064669_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191550

>>9191549

>> No.9191551 [DELETED] 

>>9191450
Adorable you look amazing got anymore

>> No.9191555 [DELETED] 
File: 332 KB, 720x720, newfag detected.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191555

>>9191551

>> No.9191557 [DELETED] 

>>9191550
You pull that off well was it hard finding 1 that fit good like that?

>> No.9191558
File: 97 KB, 627x960, 14358771_10211503698767526_8371361068510796390_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191558

>>9191550

>> No.9191559 [DELETED] 

>>9191555
Like 1st time in this thread new...baka that obvious I'll tone down the excitement

>> No.9191560
File: 28 KB, 315x395, 14344050_1080115645390120_8052453746643348859_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191560

>>9191558

>> No.9191561
File: 78 KB, 516x890, 14344813_1193315597391491_7881947411379007784_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191561

>>9191560

>> No.9191562

>>9191558
I like this, I think the wig needs to be brown and the balance would be perfect.

>> No.9191563

>>9191558
Normally I would hate that wig but I think it works here.

>> No.9191564
File: 97 KB, 688x917, 14364695_10207531120292409_8062201667076862721_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191564

>>9191561

Thus ends my photo dump.

>> No.9191565 [DELETED] 

>>9191559
ʕ•ٹ•ʔ I hate that word switch "baka" feature I'll burn this site down

>> No.9191568

>>9191448
Where the fuck do I get those holo shoes???

>> No.9191570

>>9191568
I think she said she got them from Cotton Candy Feet,

>> No.9191572
File: 79 KB, 603x960, 14264020_1204449302955383_3371111303555253572_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191572

>My wedding coord
I feel so bad for this girl, she should have found something that actually fit and flattered her, for her wedding day

>> No.9191574

>>9191572
She chose to wear lolita to her wedding, she did it to herself. It never looks good.

>> No.9191576

>>9191572
Wait....wait.... it was her actual wedding??? I though it was just her inspiration, damn! :o

>> No.9191608

>>9191488
>animal ears
>"new" trend

they've been a thing for awhile anon....

>> No.9191626

>>9191572
She couldn't even splurge on a better blouse, leg wear, hair and accessories for her wedding? Damn.

For her sake I hope this is just a wedding inspired coord.

>> No.9191651

>>9191451
salopettes are never a good look.

>> No.9191670

Recent posts demonstrate that love of OTTness is fading in favor of regular, if dressy, coords. Some of the most popular coords posted to CoF this week have been very simple, with that one handmade JSK getting an amount of likes that used to only be given to theatrical OTT coords. We're seeing a return to the fundamentals of lolita fashion and it's encouraging.

Now if only everyone would stop calling nice but not-OTT coords "casual."

>> No.9191672

>>9191670
>Now if only everyone would stop calling nice but not-OTT coords "casual."
That's the next step, anon. We'll get there!

>> No.9191677

>>9191452
Do they have an insta?

>> No.9191681

>>9191672
Fingers crossed indeed. The idea that non OTT cooords are casual is such a pain in the backside. I really hope this trend is starting to fade out.

>> No.9191682

>>9191448
>Shill edition.
Omg buy these shoes guise, they tots didn't buy this endorsement at all!

>> No.9191684 [DELETED] 

>>9191557
>>9191559
It's time to sit the fuck down, damn.

>> No.9191707

>>9191572
Damn, this just looks like she owns a single brand dress and was hell bent on wearing it in spite of anything.

If you insist on doing lolita wedding why not just order a custom sized simple white jsk from taobao? At least it would fit and be somewhat appropriate.

>> No.9191723
File: 400 KB, 720x720, summer hits 2016.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191723

>>9191670
Building on this, I scrolled down (and down and down and down...) t8hrough the beginning of July to see how many coords had passed the 1,000 likes benchmark. Some things I noticed:

1. Getting over 1k is really fucking rare, like a once-a-month type event.
2. Photo composition and color correction matters as much as the coord itself does.

From left to right:
>June 18, 1.2k likes
>July 21, 1k likes
>Aug 20, 1.2k likes
>Sept 10, 1k likes

Viewing them out of context of other coords from around those times probably doesn't leave the best impression, but from scrolling past so many fucking coords it seemed like between mid/late June to now, love for OTT was dwindling. And something else: August's "winner" is poised to overtake September's currently most-liked coord, because in less than 24 hours >>9191452 has accrued over 600 likes. Considering June's big hit was getting bumped into July (and thus would have been accruing likes for weeks), I'm betting that EGA coord takes the cake within a week.

To emphasize how rare it is to hit 1k likes: most decent coords without shitty photography got 100-150 likes. Good coords (or frankly gimmicky ones, which includes having a cat in the photo) seemed to average in the 200s, and very few got more than 500. If I was going to make brackets based on distribution it would be:

>Ita: <50 (5-10% of coords)
>Acceptable, or ita with redeeming features: 51-100 (maybe 20% of coords)
>Decent: 101-200 (30-35%)
>Good: 201-499 (30-35%)
>Extraordinarily good, or good with a gimmick: 500-799 (5%)
>Excellent: 800-999 (1%)
>Legendary: 1,000+ (<1%)

My math is shit and arbitrary. Just a rough sketch of my impressions scrolling back through the summer.

>> No.9191736

>>9191723
Another thing that supports my theory that the community is returning to basics? The growing number--and good execution of--boystyle coords.

Ouji rarely has prints, and EGA operates in an even more limited range of color. For these coords, without a gimmick to draw attention, fit and basic coordination matter a lot. When OTT Classic began its popularity, popular boystyle tended to be OTT ouji with big hats, buttcapes, crazy accessories and lots of layering. Now, ghostintheforest's recent CoF posts didn't hit it as big (in terms of likes) as some really basic but well-coordinated ouji.

All right, I'm done analyzing.

>> No.9191743

>>9191723
I think ranking based on likes is wrong because of how arbitrary things are. Obviously super low us bad but beyond that there are many shit outfits with a lot of likes and stuff that is great with a few. Timing, how efamous, pic quality all take part too. I don't think likes determine the strength at all.

>> No.9191745

>>9191723
I wonder what would happen if someone posted a handmade space print ouji coordinate with a giant hat...

>> No.9191762

>>9191745
If bad photo quality, barely 100 likes.

If good photo quality and mediocre coord, gimmickiness easily takes it up to around 200.

If the coord is actually good and the photograph composition is good and has been color-corrected so everything matches (or filtered for a dreamy effect), over 500 likes easy.

Just add a boyfriend and/or cat to the picture for extra gimmick points and you're looking at upwards of 700 likes.

But it would be too much of a clusterfuck to break 1k.

>> No.9191763

>>9191464
WHy don't people give concrit if it bother them so much that she called this casual? If someone posts a gothic coord and calls it sweet, I'm sure people would say something. Just say nice coord but it's not casual lolita. It'll stop people from using 'casual' as an excuse to avoid criticism.

>> No.9191764

>>9191743
The "rating" is more about distribution of how many coords get how many likes. And it definitely factors photo quality and gimmicks.

Efame, not so much. There were Kawaii Ambassadors with maybe 200 likes. A pretty picture with soft, pretty colors seems to matter more than any so-called fame.

>> No.9191768

>>9191672
call them out on it if they allow concrit

>>9191723
I didn't actually see any of these coords on my facebook feed. I wonder how fb decides which coords to show me.

>> No.9191769

>>9191670
>>9191672
>>9191681
Suggestions on other terms for outfits that are more "wearable" but not exactly casual? I'm guilty of using casual to describe my coords when I don't want people to keep telling me to wear a long wig, a bracelet on each wrist, a third petti and an extra headbow, but don't want to insist on no concrit at all. Minimalist?

>>9191723
I was pleasantly surprised to see the handmade dress get such a good reception even though there's nothing OTT about it. I'm going to link that post next time someone in my comm cries about meaniepants brandwhores who don't appreciate her creativity.

>> No.9191773

>>9191769
I think the handmade dress is cute, but why do you guys think it got over 1k likes? Good quality photo+people wanting to see more simple coordinates?

>> No.9191776

>>9191769
I don't think there's a need for a new term if it's just a standard coord.

>> No.9191777

>>9191769
You are part of the problem then. You don't need a term for wearable, it's wearable if you're wearing it isnt it? If your coord is not minimalist, don't call it minimalist.
> I don't want people to keep telling me to wear a long wig, a bracelet on each wrist, a third petti and an extra headbow
If they do that, simply reply to their comment to say that you are not going for an OTT look. I haven't seen those kind of comments on recent simple coords tough.

>> No.9191778
File: 235 KB, 2048x1696, 14311310_10154081511950345_7233162608150784205_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191778

I checked the last thread, no one posted this one.
If someone sat in front of me at the movies with hair like this I'd be pissed.

>> No.9191782

>>9191778
It actually was posted >>9187638

>> No.9191783

>>9191769
>>9191777
I would love to see an actual minimalist coord. But if minimalist lolita became a thing, people would probably use it as an excuse again just like they are using casual now, and argue that it's based on opinion what is and isn't minimalist.

>> No.9191785

>>9191773
I liked it because it was cute. Does there need to be an alterior motive?

>> No.9191788

>>9191459
This is simple and lovely

>> No.9191789

>>9191785
Anon's not so much looking for an ulterior motive as an explanation for how a simple and fairly generic, albeit well-made, coord got more than 1000 likes. Nothing about it really stands out on its own. It's a good simple coord, but there are better-executed simple coords out there with far fewer likes. The JSK has a nice design and is well-made, but there handmade JSKs with better design and construction out there too. What about this combination made it so popular?

>> No.9191823

>>9191454
I want to burn every single pair of gold shoes.

>> No.9191826

>>9191783
>minimalist lolita
>miho matsuda

I'm just saying

>> No.9191836

>>9191823
bitch calm down they go with the coord

>> No.9191839

>>9191823
>shoes go with the coord
>hurr wanna burn it XD le gold shoe hate meme

K

>> No.9191842

>>9191823

Usually gold shoes stick out like a sore thumb to me, but I think they actually really suit this coord. Sorry for your saltiness anon

>> No.9191844
File: 58 KB, 720x960, 14390844_10153917047783450_1922942123961631714_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191844

>> No.9191845

>>9191844
Toilet selfie. So kawaii

>> No.9191848

>>9191844
This pic has me triggered as fuck. Why didn't she crop out the half of the picture with the toilet?

>> No.9191855

>>9191844
>bathroom selfie
>did not crop out toilet or other junk
>dirty mirror
>hunched shoulders and peace sign
I can't even see the coord through all this cringe

>> No.9191898

>>9191844
>"And here is where I take my frilly shit, kyaaaa ;D <3"

>> No.9191955
File: 82 KB, 456x876, 14368906_304272983262751_6543455944689961330_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191955

>> No.9191962
File: 55 KB, 350x524, 14333003_1283278851696909_1851315763565030246_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191962

>> No.9191966
File: 89 KB, 960x664, 14333064_1528053050553622_3243133597055556514_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9191966

>> No.9191981

>>9191448
I just don't see what this has to do with Luna Lovegood besides the blonde wig? Not even a good Luna wig, at that.

>> No.9192002

>>9191981
Oh shit I thought it was supposed to be Rapunzel lol

>> No.9192008

>>9191981
this is a Luna coord??? how??

>> No.9192038

>>9191789
the lighting, wig, she's pretty, its just a nice really nice eye catching and eye pleasing photo and a beautiful coord, plus it was handmade.
photo composition definitely helps.

>> No.9192064

>>9191682
It wasn't so much a 'buy this thing!!1!' post as much of a 'these aren't readily available, but if you show interest, they might be!' as far as I understand. They were a custom request, and A knew they'd be somewhat popular... so she put as much info on how to get them as she could into her post... to be helpful...
Maybe re-read?

>> No.9192158

>>9192002
same anon. same.

>> No.9192172

>>9191955
Aww this is really cute! Not a huge fan of the collar on the blouse and kind of confused about the pink thing in her hair...besides that it all works really well

>> No.9192185
File: 80 KB, 1152x2048, 14424845_1784801961809336_5690795133533954098_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9192185

>>9191448
>Fatty-chans pls go

>> No.9192187

>>9191562
Why are lolitas autistic about matching colors?

>> No.9192214

>>9192187
Because as most lack in actual style sense that's the only way they can judge if something is good or not. If your pinks aren't the same fucking shade your fucked the great majority of the time.

>> No.9192221

>>9191459
One of bodyline's better dresses I never see

>> No.9192227

>>9191558
>>9191562
Instead of a brown wig, a smaller brown bow with the headbow would bring it together fine.

>> No.9192231

>>9192185
stop being an asshole, shes cute

>> No.9192232

>>9191651
They look good on small, flat chested girls, and if you don't try to force them to be lolita (because the silhouette isn't right)

>> No.9192264

>>9191448
Her face pisses me off almost as much as her need to always have the last word. Go home, sweetie - you're a fucking tryhard.

>>9191453
I love this except the shoes - I feel like they might look better if they were burgundy/wine to match the dress. The tights seem a little busy too

.>>9191572
This blouse is just depressing.

>> No.9192299

>>9192231
Here's your (you).

>> No.9192315

>>9192264
What's up with all the hate on the OP girl? Is she e-famous on Rufflechat or something? Her face is not familiar to me in the slightest.

>> No.9192332

>>9192264
Hi Jen.

>> No.9192347

>>9191723
Part of the reason some coords reach 1000 is how the FB algorithm works.
>citation needed

>> No.9192429
File: 45 KB, 528x960, 14355183_974954055946985_5174009376603646665_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9192429

>> No.9192437
File: 48 KB, 540x814, 14390933_1251789408178056_6165098223395264709_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9192437

>> No.9192446

>>9191723
I think you also need to take into account how many people they are friends with in CoF. Having a bunch of friends in the group can get a bunch of likes right off the bat since it sends notifications and is more likely to show up on their friends feeds.

>> No.9192504

>>9192437
normally I don't hate on gold shoes but why the hell she wear them with this dress? sure there might be gold accessories up close but if you can't see gold on a dress in a photo you should wear different shoes

>> No.9192518

>>9192504
I own this print and there's actually a lot of gold in it, as well as the hardware on the pearl chains etc. It's just a bad photo imo.

>> No.9192685

>>9192185
Fuck off, this is actually pretty cute

>> No.9192695

>>9192685
bathroom kei is tots in fashion vogue. this anon gets it.

>> No.9192862

>>9191763
>If someone posts a gothic coord and calls it sweet

Except it happens the other way around

>> No.9192906

>>9191450

Where did you get your tights they're cute

>> No.9192940
File: 64 KB, 640x960, 14322614_10208441692054120_6853777427103384492_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9192940

>> No.9192943

>>9192940
That's a different twist to holy laterun and i sort of like it

>> No.9192946

>>9192940
God no, this is so costumey

>> No.9192973

>>9191452
All their coords are stunning.

>> No.9192980

>>9192185
This is good for a first coord! No need to be mean about her weight.

>> No.9193001

>>9192214
Except it's never good to judge colors via a monitor.

>> No.9193007

>>9192429
This looks lige agelay.

>> No.9193057

>>9191769
call it a "simple coordinate". That's what it is, no? A basic lolita coordinate.

>> No.9193059

>>9192940
>no wrist wear or accessories of any sort besides a tacky set of horns

>> No.9193077

>>9192862
No it doesn't?

>> No.9193122

>>9193077
Anon is probably referring to people who call a dress or outfit gothic because it's black even though it has mostly sweet elements.

>> No.9193126

>>9193122
Inb4 newfags start the argument that it being black automatically makes it 2goffic5u

>> No.9193132

>>9192906
>you
Anon stop.

>> No.9193365

>>9191723
LOL I was doing this in my head anon, but thanks for breaking it down and making a clear post about it. I like seeing metadata trends

>> No.9193374

>>9193122
But when that happens people do give them concrit. It's only when people post non-casual coords and call them casual, no one publicly tells them it's not casual.

>> No.9193386

>>9193374
Because it's a waste of time.
Last call out/advice I gave, whixh was very gentle, I got a 'ohhuuum, this was just blahblahblah personal style blahblahblah I think the flower crown works blahblahblah thanks for your advice I'll never take into consideration ever.'

>> No.9193389

>>9192980
Get the fuck out samefag.

>> No.9193392

>>9191677
Seconding this

>> No.9193393

>>9193386
We know people use the term casual as an excuse to avoid concrit, so I think this would actually work really well. Also there may be newfags who really believe their coords are casual just because everyone else is calling basic coords casual.

>> No.9193397

>>9192906

She didn't say in her post, but they're the Holy Lantern tights from AP. She probably got them second hand from LaceMarket. You could buy a similar design on taobao/aliexpress, though I wouldn't recommend an exact replica of these on principle.

I'll add that you sound new, so gulls are gonna keep telling you to lurk moar, but I admire your enthusiasm.

>> No.9193427

>>9192185
>first coord
>old school black and white
This girl has amazing taste for a beginner.

>> No.9193566 [DELETED] 

>>9193397

Meant that second comment for >>9191551 anon

>> No.9193572

>>9193427
Omg. Shut the fuck up already.

>> No.9193613

>>9191723
CoF confirmed for shit taste as usual, I don't think any of these are anything particularly special except 3, and 2 arguably isn't even a very good coord. Beyond gimmicks, I do think the metrics for an average coord have a huge amount to do with photo quality and the number of lolita friends you have, like >>9191743 said.

Whether it's a popular substyle matters a lot too - if you could graph it I'm sure there'd be a U-shaped trend of likes:rarity of substyle. The most common styles are (obviously) popular, and rare substyles also rake in the likes as extreme rarity qualifies as a gimmick, but the in-between zone of mildly unpopular stuff can get under 100 likes easily even if it's a good coord.

>> No.9193614

>>9192038

I think the fact that it's an unusual color helps too. You really just don't see a ton of gray in the fashion.

>> No.9193623
File: 37 KB, 434x347, feedback.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9193623

>>9191488
>>9191450

>eye cancer

>> No.9193646

>>9192429
She is super ugly, poor girl.

>> No.9193648 [DELETED] 

>>9193427
she's fat as fuck tho.

>> No.9193781

>>9193648
Thanks for stating the obvious.

>> No.9193981

>>9191778
but is anyone going to point out, it's not really lolita though...

>> No.9193992
File: 24 KB, 320x320, 1463722233514.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9193992

>>9192231
>>9192685
>>9192980
>>9193427
we get it, you're upset you/your friend was posted.

>> No.9194337

>>9193981
Looks a lot like a blatant copy of new AP styling to me. It's as lolita as a current AP photoshoot.

>> No.9194374 [DELETED] 

>>9193648
You sound like the guy that can't comprehend that a kilo of feathers is the same as a kilo steel because you just see that steel is heavier then a feather.

Being fat isn't always a ita. But being salty and a cunt is.

>> No.9194390 [DELETED] 

>>9194374
>Being fat isn't always a ita. But being salty and a cunt is.
This is something ugly people say to fee better about themselves. Unfortunately, how horrible of a person you are rarely ever affects your ability to dress well. How fat you are on the other hand more often than not does, especially if you don't know how to dress for your size.

>> No.9194395 [DELETED] 

>>9194390
>fee better
What do you tell yourself to feel better about your typos?

>> No.9194396
File: 202 KB, 720x960, 14344356.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9194396

>> No.9194413 [DELETED] 

>>9194395
The fact that my typo is the only rebuttal that you could come up with.

>> No.9194426 [DELETED] 

>>9194374

Lol what.

America has an obesity epidemic. While it shouldn't detract from her personality, it definitely should not be encouraged as a positive or neutral trait aesthetically.

>> No.9194428

>>9194396
There's nothing bad about the coord per se, but combination of the hair, glasses, and braces makes her look like that girl in high school whose best friend was the guidance counselor.

>> No.9194724

>>9194396
her coord is really nice but perhaps a more flattering facial expression would do her justice
or she may just not give a fuck then thats cool too i guess

>> No.9195252

>>9192299
>>9193992
i dont even know her its just shitty to say "fatty chans pls go"
being fat doesnt prevent you from pulling off a good coord
and it looks ok so chill with your hatred

>> No.9195255

>>9195252
Fatty chan
plz
g o

>> No.9195259
File: 123 KB, 282x265, tumblr_inline_o0rrchzB001rpcjtm_540.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9195259

>>9195255
wow best reply in the book

>> No.9195319
File: 188 KB, 1532x1288, 1474550692662.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9195319

Commencing dump

>> No.9195323
File: 75 KB, 750x744, 1474550690441.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9195323

>>9195319
So nice to see Tamie again, not enough Moitie lately

>> No.9195325
File: 84 KB, 714x1423, 1474550465498.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9195325

>>9195323

>> No.9195327
File: 138 KB, 720x960, 1474550599501.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9195327

>>9195325
>lack of pirate coords this year

>> No.9195330
File: 293 KB, 1536x2048, 14434885_1198995780157241_5054426661032013311_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9195330

>>9195327

>> No.9195332
File: 69 KB, 667x1000, 14435027_10210557820962584_3610179889776424597_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9195332

>>9195330

>> No.9195333
File: 739 KB, 2048x2048, 14444735_1600370686923130_738289117725226515_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9195333

>>9195332

>> No.9195336
File: 96 KB, 960x960, 14333701_10205433143667127_4165043254059861277_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9195336

>>9195333

>> No.9195338
File: 101 KB, 960x960, 14333206_10210744076343615_6853746571872285407_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9195338

>>9195336

>> No.9195341
File: 107 KB, 720x960, 1474550624707.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9195341

>>9195338

>> No.9195342
File: 615 KB, 1536x2048, 1474550653923.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9195342

>>9195341
not sure if I double posted something, think that's it

>> No.9195404

>>9195330
kawaii krispy kreme

>> No.9195459

>>9195336
I really love that set... A shame there is only Marie prints, and not Toulouse or Berlioz ones.

>> No.9195475

>>9195336
Well, that's a....different way to wear that beret.

>> No.9195482

>>9195333
I hate this fucking pose

>> No.9195567

>>9195482
edgy
d
g
y

>> No.9195577

>>9195336
This is not the right dress for her.

>> No.9195583

>>9195567
Not that anon but how is that edgy to dislike a pose and express your opinion on it?

>> No.9195594

>>9195583
>I hate this fucking pose

how is that not edgy

>> No.9195626

>>9195332
I want this aesthetic. Pirate kei.

>>9195594
Your definition of edgy and mine are two very different things sir

>> No.9195638

>>9191778
Hey, Hoot.
Stop trying to be Risa Nakamura.
That facial expression makes it look like you're debating spitting -vs- swallowing.

>> No.9195682

>>9195638
Have you ever even given a blow job? That's not what that looks like.

>> No.9195684

>>9195626
Pirate lolita has always been a thing?

>> No.9195687

>>9195682
>has given a blowjob
What a whore.

>> No.9195688

>>9195482
this is the most normal pose in lolita I've ever seen, please watch your sodium levels

>> No.9195689

>>9195688
They just got triggered because her face isn't very pretty.

>> No.9195717

>>9195682

You've taken a pic of yourself while blowing someone? Weirdo.

>> No.9195722

>>9194337
Not much poof though.

>> No.9195729
File: 89 KB, 621x960, 14199511_1677720755880688_5888265689293878825_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9195729

>not posting this concrit clusterfuck
If you're gonna post your unfinished coord, don't be surprised when no one holds your hand and tells you it's good when it's not. She really couldn't even buy some plain white tights?

>> No.9195732

>>9195729
This has been posted in more than one CoF thread, the post is weeks old.

>> No.9195844
File: 119 KB, 720x960, 14358871_911570975642249_719342971848744061_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9195844

>> No.9195850
File: 26 KB, 120x120, 8YuIzBF.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9195850

>>9195844
>mfw I thought this photo was anzufag reposting >>9195776

>> No.9196009

>>9195689
>>her

>> No.9196017

>>9195323
blast from the past! still rocking the ero looks.

>> No.9196101

>>9195844
why????? did they think this was a good idea

>> No.9196172
File: 72 KB, 550x660, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9196172

>>9191682
>>9192064
Lol yeah and how she is posting about a pre-order for these shoes, what a big fucking coincidence

>> No.9196182

>>9195844
Wow.... she went to party city, where she belongs.

>> No.9196186

>>9192064
Whenever I see girls defending themselves like this here, I die of second hand embarrassment.

>> No.9196192

>>9193389
The only samefag is you senpai, relax already

>> No.9196200

>>9196192
Anon.
The post you're responding to is literally days old at this point.
I'm sorry you got posted and you didn't like you're feedback, but get over it.

>> No.9196206
File: 529 KB, 537x1543, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9196206

>>9196186
ditto.
Someone pointed out that holo shoes have already been done before, and she went super defensive, which is unusual unless you have personal stakes at hand

People comment about things being done before or similarities between Brand releases all the time on Updates and normally no one bats an eyelid

>> No.9196249

>>9191448
SOMEONE PLEASE TELL ME WHERE I CAN GET THOSE SHOES

>> No.9196255
File: 264 KB, 1286x858, pepfox2016 teaparty.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9196255

It hasn't been on CoF but let's get this thread moving!
Peppermint Fox's annual tea party

>> No.9196256
File: 80 KB, 639x960, pepfox2016 teaparty designers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9196256

>>9196255
Designers on the left and right

>> No.9196258
File: 461 KB, 2305x1143, pepfox2016 teaparty1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9196258

>>9196256
All photos from the Pep Fox fb page

>> No.9196260
File: 447 KB, 2305x1143, pepfox2016 teaparty2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9196260

>>9196258

>> No.9196263

>>9196258
Are there any more photos of the middle one? Details of the cardigan?

>> No.9196276
File: 1.32 MB, 926x954, cardigan.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9196276

>>9196263
from the fb page. I like the badges but I wish she had arranged them in a trickle down pattern(?) they hang and pull on the bust a bit badly

>> No.9196279

>>9196276
Cardigan is the new itabag, love it

>> No.9196282

>>9196255
>>9196256
>>9196258

Just... post things from cof in the cof thread then? I'm sure there has been more content in cof that you could post. Those pictures weren't posted in a group looking to share coords/ get crit. Many are not even meant to be lolita. It would be more suitable for the otome thread if anything.

>> No.9196283

>>9196282
this.

this isn't a "post whatever you find on facebook" thread, come on.

>> No.9196363

>>9196206
Good job censoring the names buddy

>> No.9196377
File: 122 KB, 540x960, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9196377

>> No.9196389

>>9196377
It's adorable, even though there's a lack of jewelry accessories, it's still cute as fuck

>> No.9196390

>>9196249
http://cottoncandyfeet.com/#!/Pre-order-Cotton-Candy-Prism-Unicorn-Princess-Hologram-Shoes/p/71958195/category=0

It's on pre-order and won't be out until Nov. 1st

>> No.9196391

>>9196377
This seems really boring and underwhelming for such an elaborate dress.

>> No.9196394

>>9196377
Nice casual coord but tacky shoes

>> No.9196395

>>9196389
Hi Jade.

We know you have a giant ego but try to contain yourself.

>> No.9196399

>>9196377
Adult baby alert!

>> No.9196410

>>9196377
Plz no ageplay motifs in Lolita plz plz

>> No.9196415

>>9196390
?
then how did she get them?

>> No.9196420

>>9196172
Normally I love holographic stuff, but I really hate these shoes. The holo just doesn't match the style, imo.

>> No.9196431

>>9196415
probably a restock pre-order

>> No.9196433

>>9196389
I'm not Jade.

Please, try again

>> No.9196445

>>9196415
They're probably a test pair to gain orders and attention. Or to see how the material will last. Either way they look like tacky 80s trash.

>> No.9196446

>>9196415
By having an arrangement with the company. Either she did a custom order, or she was fiven a pair to model/promote.
It's w/e, I still won't buy from them but I don't think less of them. I do think less of A, she did not handle this well.

>> No.9196451

>>9196182
i see u, phi phi

>> No.9196452

>>9195333
Looks like someone's dad wearing lolita.

>> No.9196456

>>9195333
>>9196009
>>9196452
That's a man, baby!

>> No.9196460

>>9196258
>the third one
Dear lord

>> No.9196561
File: 77 KB, 655x582, 1463131065337.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9196561

>>9196394
>casual

>> No.9196568

>>9196561
What da fuk

>> No.9196591

>>9196172
someone just came out of nowhere and posted this in my comm... I get the feeling they are paying more than one person to promote these

>> No.9196602

>>9196591
Are we in the same comm? Someone posted it in mine yesterday.

>> No.9196604

>>9196602
ohio egl?

>> No.9196605

>>9196377
adorable

>> No.9196607

>>9191448
Is she wearing an underskirt or is that part of the dress?

>> No.9196608

>>9196604
Yup

>> No.9196613

>>9196608
...yeah, I thought that was weird. but maybe it's just me?

>> No.9196617

>>9196415
I thought this company had been around a while. I know I've seen those shoes before...a long time ago.

>> No.9196621

>>9196613
At least it wasn't as cringey as the joke Harambe meetup lmao

>> No.9196636

>>9196621
haha true

>> No.9196733

>>9196391
I have this dress and don't find it to be elaborate at all. What?

>> No.9196737

>>9196283
Maybe it should be. Lack of content means more trolling.

>> No.9196740

>>9196377
I thought this was really cute. Then I saw the fucking baby bottle phone.

>> No.9196774

>>9196737
That's called the online comms thread you idiot.

>> No.9196783

>>9196737
that's not how threads work.

>>9196774
or even an indie designer thread, if you want to get really proactive.

>> No.9196794

>>9196200
>you're feedback
Being stupid is hard, isn't anon ;c

>> No.9196816

>>9196774
>>9196783
Only because we try to only post CoF stuff here. But there's not always enough content to post, hence trolling.

>> No.9196826

>>9196255
I agree, please, do not post non-COF pictures.

>> No.9196865

>>9196816
your perspective is incorrect.

>> No.9196884
File: 110 KB, 640x960, 14364737_1788410931404840_7648164009580407039_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9196884

Am I the only one who thinks that this isn't lolita? It's impressive that she made it herself, but to me it seems more like a historically inspired dress than lolita fashion.

>> No.9196888

>>9196884
I thought the same thing.

Also, not really digging the shoes.

>> No.9196892

>>9196884
Hmm, maybe if she changed the back collar part to be more conservative? It makes me think of Fleur du Antoinette, from MM.

>> No.9196895

>>9196892
I think that's what she was going for, but the coord itself just doesn't look lolita anymore. A puffier more obvious petti, legwear and more lolita like shoes would have probably tipped the balance back into lolita.

>> No.9196898

>>9196415
She got the protype to shill with

>> No.9196901

>>9196884
what are you talking about? I love historical reenactment-kei. It's up there with LDS-kei

>> No.9196907

>>9196892
agreed. the neckline might work for ero but it is just not here.

>>9196895
double agreed, though the shoes could work. she could use wristwear also; wrist cuffs help lolita-fy iffy dresses.

>> No.9196915

>>9196884
I also hate the "Handmade by me~~ ^___^ ~~ tee hee hee omg I am so kawaii! ~*~"

>> No.9196930

>>9196888
They look like Liz Lisa replica pumps

>> No.9196944

>>9191451
A G E P L A Y
G
E
P
L
A
Y

>> No.9196952

>>9196915
so you hate handmade in general or just in that statement

>> No.9196980

>>9195475
she mentioned that it was falling when she took the photo

>> No.9196985

>>9196980
and she couldn't fix it and take another photo? it takes like 2 seconds

>> No.9196998

>>9196907
wrist cuffs would make no sense with a dress like that...

>> No.9197049

>>9196884
I kind of wish she made another pose, she looks like she just read some crazy shit or like she's looking at someone making a fuss close to her.

>> No.9197064

>>9196952
I love handmade, I hate the praise seeking

>> No.9197223

>>9197064
you are a sour gummy bear

>> No.9197270

>>9196915

I'm one salty vagina but goddamn anon you could open a mine with that salt.

>> No.9197286

>>9196258
that third one. Even the bf knew it didnt match.

>> No.9197298

>>9196172
I wouldn't wear these with Lolita but u would wear these with other things. I just don't like how she handled it when someone brought up the other brand that made them eons ago. I'm going to buy them in both colors just because I'm a sucker for all things holo. But not going to wear them with Lolita.

>> No.9197333

>>9196884
I like this, but the shoes are Liz Lisa. It's so confusing.

>> No.9197334

>>9196591
>>9196172
>shill accusations
Honestly, I think it's just girls getting worked up over shiny rainbow shoes. They're tacky af and I had someone going on about them in my Facebook feed. They're just ita magnets is all.

>> No.9197352

>>9196377
Jade why'd you self post then cry when you get criticism? Not everyone wants to kiss your fat ass.

>> No.9197356

>>9197334
Considering Allison is the one who wore it on Cof, tried to shill it there until she got shut down, then moved to Lolita updates to do the same, if she posted on her fb group it only makes sense. For someone who is "just a customer" she has been answering all sorts of questions about it.

They are ita magnets but she is involved. Pretty scummy of her to try to blatantly use cof to sell these ugly things

>> No.9197357

>>9196377
Is this shopped? Asking because of the shadow above her arm along the door frame is wider than the one below her skirt. Also, the angle of the skirting board in the bottom right-hand corner. Can't tell if it's odd lighting/oddly shaped room or not.

>> No.9197376

>>9197357
Probably, she is a lot bigger in real life.

>> No.9197430
File: 278 KB, 960x1280, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9197430

I kind of like this one but the fucking phone case

>> No.9197442

>>9197430
...are you nitpicking a fucking phone case?

>> No.9197554

>>9197442
Its a fucking baby bottle, anon.

>> No.9197556

>>9197442
Have you even read the thread?

>> No.9197583
File: 78 KB, 551x960, 14369918_1473003986049861_8159378631007536461_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9197583

I love her coords

>> No.9197586
File: 95 KB, 960x960, 14433226_10101821513744261_5282291972677577396_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9197586

>>9197583

>> No.9197588
File: 186 KB, 960x957, 14446136_10154136698833409_3176992750687882978_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9197588

>>9197586

>> No.9197589
File: 35 KB, 251x395, 14463038_10153690154082024_7516370938186988685_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9197589

>>9197588

>> No.9197591
File: 42 KB, 316x395, 14484862_10153904838576485_3021263142617011371_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9197591

>>9197589
A lot of mediocre coords this morning.

>> No.9197611

>>9197588
She is wearing a really ugly wig to match her haircolour to the print but she couldn't be bothered to match her shoes?

>> No.9197616

>>9197430
>everyone's talking about the phone case
>no one's talking about the giant fucking "BABY" printed on her mirror

>> No.9197622

>>9197616
1 There is a lolita brand called BABY the star shine bright
2 people who aren't baby's call each other baby

>> No.9197644

>>9195323
Just as I had given up on seeing nice ero, my soul has been refreshed.

>> No.9197730

>>9197622
That's a fucking stretch dude.

>> No.9197734

>>9197730
Not really, baby is her favourite brand.

>> No.9197740

>>9197730
it's not. irl people call btssb baby

>> No.9197741

>>9197734
>>9197740
I'm looking at her 'Baby' logo and it looks nothing like it. I'm not the poster that pointed it out initially, but I see their point.

>> No.9197827

>>9197734
>>9197740
Yeah, no. People sure call btssb "baby" in conversation, but having "BABY" in giant cutesy/ backward cutout letters above a mirror gives no indication of being related to the brand. it's probably meant to be childish or ddlg related.

>> No.9197872

>>9191448
>>9191448
i hate those shoes so much they are just plain tacky plus this chick posted them to the lolita updates facebook as 'a new super unique design that she help the company create!!' and when some poor girl pointed out that another company has had similar shoes for a while she had an absolute fit

>> No.9197888

>>9197730
You know referring to each other as baby in the south is pretty common... literally every relationship I have had a guy would call me babe or baby and sometimes I was older than the guy I was dating.

>> No.9197890

>>9197591
>finally something simple, wearable and non-OTT
>mediocre!!
>"I wish people would post some casual stuff! I'm sich f this OTT trend!"

This is cancer.

>> No.9197892

>>9197583
I love how she makes every dress shine.

>> No.9197904

>>9197442
> spends $200 on brand
> pairs it with a tacky ageplay phone case

>> No.9197924

>>9197888
I lived in the Souff. I know.
Still a streeeeeeeeeetch

>> No.9197929
File: 41 KB, 512x375, 9534760.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9197929

>>9197890

>> No.9198011

>>9197924
>Souff
disgusting. I moved away from there for these reasons.

>> No.9198025

>>9198011
As if the entire USA isn't shit at this point.

>> No.9198058
File: 101 KB, 528x960, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198058

Clean you're your room

>> No.9198059

>>9198058
>you're your
r u ok sis?

>> No.9198074

>>9198011
TN isn't a point of pride. I'm glad I'm back in CA

>> No.9198077

>>9198059
Shit my bad. I'm just so tired

>> No.9198084

>>9198058
>KFC cup
>Starbucks cup
>Another Starbucks cup
>KFC food literally on the bed
>Trash all over the floor
>No sheets/covers on bed
>Shit everywhere

I know we can all be messy sometimes but this is disgusting and she should feel bad.

>> No.9198239
File: 105 KB, 960x960, FB_IMG_1474770875562.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198239

Is it just me, or does her face shoop look different?

>> No.9198240
File: 116 KB, 960x960, 14462904_1109570199096489_2868497045782393426_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198240

Claire pls
>if you didn't think she shooped before think again

>> No.9198244

>>9198239
Sorry for double post! Looks like we both thought the same thing

>> No.9198253

I'm so tired right now and on my phone. I wanted to check the cof thread here and
>first end up on closet child
>wait no that's wrong, I want closet of frills
>go to Facebook
>go to cof group
>Wait this is still wrong!!!
>come here

>> No.9198257

>>9198240
I was just about to post this. I suck at spotting shoops but this gives me such uncanny valley-vibes it makes me uncomfortable

>> No.9198260

>>9198257
honestly, her eyes are so shooped on the right it doesn't even look like the same person. The nose and lips I can accept, but those eyes, damn.

>> No.9198276

>>9198257
I literally thought it was a totally different person.

>> No.9198281

>>9198240
She rushed this. Her left eye is smudged on the bottom.

She shouldnt have posted the full body pic with her face showing because that makes it glaringly obvious how fake her face is on the right.

>> No.9198283

>>9198240
Something's really off about this but I can't tell what. Besides the obvious shoop.

>> No.9198289

>>9198240
She looks so much better on the left. If that's really what she looks like then I don't understand what all the shoop is for...

>> No.9198308

>>9198283
Colour balance of the outfit. She really would've looked better with navy on her head or going with lilac socks and navy shoes.

>> No.9198310

>>9198240
inb4 she comes in screeching "NO SHOOP GAIZ" like she's been doing with all her other outfits

>> No.9198331

>>9198240
I honestly like her weird galaxy love and hair thing, but I just don't think the navy colorway suits anything she's trying to do here. She should stick to pastels.

>> No.9198333

>>9198331
Same. I don't really like it when pastels get paired with navy. It's barely okay with black.

>> No.9198335

>>9198074
Any part of the west coast is better than the east. They're all so fucking uptight over there and I swear like half of 4chan resides on the East side.

>> No.9198338

>>9198331
>>9198333
She tried something kinda different and that's all I care about. Still think she's ugly though.

>> No.9198345

>>9198335
You must encounter some shit people on the east coast then and lucky on the west. I spend half my year on both for work and much prefer the east over the west. The east has more people that seem humble then the west. All the west wants is money and fame and doesn't care who they have to throw under the bus to get to it. Also the east coast has more people then the west. So it's understandable that there's more people on this board from there. Older part of the country has more population.

>> No.9198351

>>9191723
the shoes on the far left
where do I acquire these shoes
I didn't realize my life was incomplete until this moment

>> No.9198353

>>9197589
Holy shit her face looks pasted on.

>> No.9198393

>>9198058
She was in the hospital recently so I think she's been have trouble cleaning up judging by the content of her statuses.

>> No.9198394

>>9197064
Having pride in your handmade work is praise seeking now?

>> No.9198421

>>9198393
So?
Don't have posts showing your filth.

>> No.9198440

>>9198393
>somehow doesn't have the energy to throw away four whole cups and containers
>has the energy to put on an entire coord plus wig, photograph it, and post it online
Yeah no, zero pity points here.

>> No.9198451

>>9198351
Bodyline.
Not even kidding, those boots are from Bodyline.

>> No.9198461

>>9198394
some people hate anyone saying anything about themselves overtly. that anon is one of those people.

>> No.9198462

>>9198240
why does she look so much oranger than usual? i didn't even realize it was claire until i read the replies about shoop

>> No.9198557

>>9198393
I get having trouble doing cleaning but that's her bed. She doesn't sleep with that food right? So she can clean that much.

>> No.9198585

>>9198058
How did this get so many likes? Her room needs cleaning and she isn't even wearing shoes.

>> No.9198612

>>9196452
>>9196456
Shut the fuck up, Lotte. You're not cuter yourself.

>> No.9198619

>>9198240
First time seeing this I was like "haha, who is this chick copying Claire?"
Didn't even recognise her before squinting at the closeup.

>> No.9198717
File: 14 KB, 325x305, lets see it.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198717

>>9197376
Damn, you must be a size zero model irl.

>> No.9198748
File: 90 KB, 903x960, 14390620_10206685168640978_2325060528367379628_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198748

>> No.9198750
File: 145 KB, 960x960, 14433218_10205702658846141_9025643336395847432_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198750

>>9198748

>> No.9198755
File: 143 KB, 960x960, 14449734_989134931208923_466187325251653464_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198755

>>9198750

>> No.9198759
File: 205 KB, 960x960, 14492434_1174724992601603_8106472614119858335_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198759

>>9198755
i really wish she wore lipstick because this is a beautiful coord

>> No.9198760
File: 117 KB, 866x767, 14495522_10153928175092423_7608929905250578491_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198760

>>9198759

>> No.9198778
File: 171 KB, 1079x809, 14445188_10154548586295948_2343946702066165517_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198778

>>9198759
why is her nose red?

>> No.9198784

>>9198778
she says she wanted to do 'crying makeup' but its not very well executed

>> No.9198799

>>9198717

Size 2 actually

> but nvm because anyone who isn't chubby/thinks someone else is larger must be a 'skinny bitch' right?

>> No.9198803
File: 97 KB, 960x960, 14485013_10211361971793777_5933010382518259487_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198803

Is this exhibit they're all talking about in Japan? I didn't realize there were so many western lolitas living in Japan

>> No.9198805
File: 123 KB, 489x720, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198805

>> No.9198809
File: 49 KB, 336x720, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198809

This hat is a bit overwhelming...

>> No.9198812
File: 104 KB, 669x960, 14492344_10209711402356926_4943606948387922268_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198812

I think the wig color doesn't suit her and the bangs are too short

>> No.9198817
File: 75 KB, 640x960, 14390770_1165304966877854_6196714792790540816_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198817

I can't get over how fucking cute this girl is

>> No.9198821
File: 45 KB, 480x480, 14390848_10154536051938766_6572094347281955054_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198821

>dat forehead

>> No.9198823

>>9198812
Is that a giant Eva head I see on her bookshelf

>> No.9198828

>>9198812
I think she suits red nicely.

But the lighting in this pic is a bit off, look how saturated the poster on the right is.

>> No.9198830
File: 182 KB, 768x952, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198830

>> No.9198832
File: 119 KB, 647x736, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198832

>>9198828

>> No.9198834
File: 161 KB, 749x752, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9198834

This dress is really cute but not sure about the pink.

>> No.9198836

>>9198812
This actually makes Magic Princess look nice, I find it rather tacky usually.

>> No.9198837

>>9198817
The hair doesn't flatter her face shape, but she's very cute.

>> No.9198845

>>9198834
I wish she had a fringe or something. And some stronger eye makeup if she wants to wear those glasses. The pink is really poorly distributed, the top and the bottom look like totally separate outfits.

>> No.9198849

>>9198748
It's been nice to see Fancypants in less pastel/cute things recently! It suits her.

>>9198755
I love this - she's born to wear outfits like this

>>9198778
I wish the pin under the hat was a more vivid red like the skirt. Other than that, I like it!

>> No.9198861

>>9198834
With a face like that she shouldn't be taking photos from that angle, it just accentuates how big and droopy her nose and mouth are.

>> No.9198901

>>9198834
I like everything except the shoes, wrong shade of pink

>> No.9198902

>>9198462
Honestly she looks green to me

>> No.9198912

>>9198861
There sure is a lot of chat about this one average outfit shot. :)

>> No.9198914

>>9198823
one of us
one of us
one of us

>> No.9198919

>>9198834
Whats the obsession with this girl?

>> No.9198929

>>9198919
There isn't one. Smells like selfpost.

>> No.9198937

>>9198778
>"gothic"

>> No.9198939

>>9198830
babby's first brand?

>> No.9198996

>>9198832
Eyes <3

>> No.9199194

>>9198421
ok barbie

>> No.9199281

>>9198929
witch hunt?

>> No.9199809 [DELETED] 

>>9198845
Do you have any suggestions for eye make? :) I completely agree my eyes look bare, but I have quite sensitive eyes, so wearing too much makes my eyes water and then I just ruin it.

>> No.9200228

>>9198750
That make up is a sin

>> No.9202286

>>9197591
This is cute.

>>9198760
This is a nice, solid classic coord.

>>9198809
I like this, but I wish she had on boots and bigger hair to balance out the volume on that hat.

>>9198817
Cute simple coord! I like it.