Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 233 KB, 720x960, EA0DABB2-27FC-4637-B2F5-BA9BC5C2471A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034562 No.10034562 [Reply] [Original] [rbt]

Black Friday Sale: All Itas Must Go edition.

>> No.10034563
File: 148 KB, 746x937, 73112775-0CF0-4EC9-B2FE-A1190352AA6D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034563

>> No.10034564
File: 211 KB, 744x893, 9D0CCDF4-7A62-4673-9F4C-C95C08958009.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034564

>>10034563

>> No.10034568
File: 264 KB, 620x1099, B4891215-2E68-4343-89B6-AA323496D66F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034568

>>10034564

>> No.10034569
File: 319 KB, 750x742, A281D5AE-63F4-47B1-A156-DA63F9C518D1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034569

>>10034568

>> No.10034570
File: 846 KB, 1536x2128, 60FD9F23-1AC0-4DDC-A91F-A1E9E9E57C6C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034570

>>10034569

>> No.10034573
File: 217 KB, 750x711, 7B5811D3-8B6F-4B6B-8DF8-85119E3B91F0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034573

>>10034570

>> No.10034575
File: 182 KB, 484x645, Nit_20Bona_202013_20004.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034575

Ribbon Heart JSK for sale on lacemarket. Why the fuck would anyone use this picture to sell their dress??????

>> No.10034581

>>10034575
Normies lacking in self awareness would do that, honestly.

>> No.10034584

>opens thread
>plethora of classic itas
doing gods work anon

>> No.10034587
File: 307 KB, 835x1024, 003C822D-C00B-4F61-B704-8DD9BC0E135E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034587

I like her other coords but wtf made her think this looks ok

>> No.10034588
File: 613 KB, 750x714, B8E561CC-4144-48BB-B350-42E19571600C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034588

>>10034587

>> No.10034589

>>10034587
What do you mean, it's cute and she looks gorgeous. We need more gothic lolitas who are actually goths

>> No.10034591
File: 719 KB, 750x860, 9B196828-7060-4DBD-9168-7589B1AE4A48.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034591

>>10034588

>> No.10034594
File: 427 KB, 622x733, F74C61C2-6F0D-4BA6-87E9-C437B626DE6E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034594

>>10034591

>> No.10034595
File: 598 KB, 750x931, C28B8362-B523-4E5B-B3A1-BFB2305A39A0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034595

>>10034594

>> No.10034596
File: 54 KB, 400x369, D9352206-92A7-4B15-B579-5269CB5679E1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034596

>>10034595

>> No.10034597
File: 107 KB, 398x810, 0AAA2C60-2617-4E9E-BA2C-5BCDC381F1D8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034597

>>10034596

>> No.10034599
File: 741 KB, 1167x1920, 1B2E5593-5075-46E2-BE9C-41A2F7067099.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034599

>>10034597

>> No.10034600

>>10034587
This is a great coord? What's wrong with it?

>> No.10034601

>>10034570
Lmao at this shitting in a box pose/facial expression.

>> No.10034602
File: 171 KB, 640x853, D3F20CA5-D00A-43A5-B41E-7DEEB15AD019.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034602

>>10034599

>> No.10034603

>>10034599
This is fine other than the shoes and the awful bag

>> No.10034604
File: 97 KB, 400x600, 200DB371-3B62-44D5-929D-D5CF8B5D223C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034604

>>10034602

>> No.10034611

>>10034587
iirc she already addressed that she wasn't as happy with this one and the mismatched ivory/white. So why post it here? It's hardly ita

>> No.10034614
File: 236 KB, 750x1006, F0725899-52C3-4B83-9E78-98F734B975BE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034614

>> No.10034629

>>10034602
why do itas think normie blouses work with lolita? I don't really care for blouseless lolita, but imo it'd look a million times better in most cases than a normie office blouse.

>> No.10034632

>>10034588
So tired of the "holding skirt out" pose. Why do people do it...

>> No.10034636

>>10034562
The horrible Simplicity pattern surfaces again.

>> No.10034637

>>10034587
The fishnets are a nitpick if anything. This doesn't belong here.

>> No.10034638

>>10034597
Ageplay, or Flurry Heart cosplay? This was tagged lolita?

>> No.10034639

>>10034604
Itas vs zombies

>> No.10034645

>>10034639
Please may the zombies win

>> No.10034646

>>10034595
Looks like a start of a milk maid porno.

>> No.10034655

>>10034614
Who claimed this to be lolita?

>> No.10034665
File: 78 KB, 720x960, FB_IMG_1542228847767.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034665

She wore this to give a presentation about j-fashion. Mana help us.

>> No.10034694

>>10034602
god i know it’s not her (she was way bigger) but there was a girl in my comm briefly who wore that exact outfit and insisted everyone call her dolly strawberry

>> No.10034695

>>10034602
Wow what an ugly replica

>> No.10034798

>>10034568
haha holy shit it’s where He stood

>> No.10034801
File: 54 KB, 493x622, 2F6B4E38-5BB3-41D5-8965-0808EC590A99.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034801

>>10034603
>>10034599
>bodyline squirrel party
>that pose
>that makeup
>username “midnightwolf21”
>resemblance to pic related

>> No.10034805

>>10034801
The squirrels are cute af, one of them looks extra sassy, love it. Sadly I don't like the cuts.

>> No.10034810

>>10034596
wholesome itas.

>> No.10034811

>>10034604
replica? if not still yike yike

>> No.10034828

>>10034587
I wish I could look this agressive in goth. My poor baby face.

>> No.10034868
File: 104 KB, 640x960, 491D30FF-4130-4000-B5B3-32F4FD1DD5E8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10034868

I wish the harness and sailor suits would go away

>> No.10034879

>>10034868
I like harnesses, but the ones that go around your tits + giant tits = barf

>> No.10034888

>>10034568
it's like they just gave up halfway trough the coord

>> No.10034916

>>10034868
This sucks, because her features are so nice and she has potential to look attractive, but she would have to change everything. Her shitty fashion, gross kink harness shit, her ratty hair, put on a fucking bra.

>> No.10034920

>>10034587
No head accessories, or hand accessories. Fishnets. White mixed with ivory. This looks like half a coord. Shes very pretty, no doubt. But her outfit is half asked and she knows it.

>> No.10034932

>>10034570
old

>> No.10034937

>>10034665
What on earth was the presentation like? Was there a slideshow?

>> No.10034938

>>10034629
This was honestly something I didn't get at first until I photographed one of my coords. Once I saw the pictures, it suddenly clicked, it looked so weird and out of place

>> No.10034954

>>10034568
Oh fuck, I know her

>> No.10035003

>>10034665
I saw this and like. Why are you acting as an expert/ambassador for jfashion and japanese brands whilst wearing all offbrand and an infanta dress? I feel like I've seen newbie itas do this before and it hurts me.

>> No.10035006

>>10034604
Holy fuck burn this replica. Toy Fantasy does not deserve this.

>> No.10035048

>>10034596
Oh god. This was my first "Lolita dress" (the flowery one) back in about 2007. I'm embarrassed just seeing it again.

>> No.10035072

>>10034568
She’s an ita mess both in dress and in personality. Acts like some kinda goddamn knowitall around even shittier itas like she’s the ita queen of the midwest

>> No.10035099

>>10035003
oh man tho anon you shoulda seen my getup for my high school presentation on lolita fashion in like 2005 or 2006. i wore a regular tank top, and a hot topic tutu underneath a short crown-print skirt that was sold to me as "baby the stars shine bright" (it clearly wasn't but i bought into it at the time and bought it) and the other people in my group project weren't dressed much better, i really wish i had photos

>> No.10035102

>>10035099
To be fair, the fashion and information about the fashion was nowhere near as accessible at the time so being ita in the west was a lot "easier". Nowadays there's no excuse.

>> No.10035108
File: 325 KB, 406x367, 52347636346.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035108

>>10034599

Jesus christ

>Imagine
>It's early in the morning
>You woke up only minutes ago, sitting in front of your pc, eating breakfast and checking on the gull board
>Still dark outside, only your screen and a small lamp on your desktop lighten up your room
>You're still half asleep and just seeing the usual ita stuff, nothing special
>Click on one random coord pic that actually looks decent judging by its thumbnail
>Suddenly you see pic related
>Immediateley close window, staring into emptiness
>Be spooked for the rest of the morning

I swear by mana it took atleast a minute for my brain to process what it just saw.

>> No.10035111

>>10034595
>>10034596
Why is everyone such fucking slobs? Are they all spoonies?
>spent time wearing a thing
>too much anxiety to wash my face
>oh well
>WE CAN'T ALL BE PERFECT
>self love
>not washing is self care

>> No.10035112

>>10034868
Jesus fucking christ, this is enough intarwebs for today.

>> No.10035141
File: 1.70 MB, 1210x680, uuuuh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035141

i don't know how to feel about the one on the left calling herself a sweet lolita(((yikes))) . thoughts ?

>> No.10035145

>>10035141
just your standard attention whores

>> No.10035151

>>10035141
Triggers the fuck out of me that the title of that video
calls her a "lolita doll"

>> No.10035152

>>10034599
Cursed image

>> No.10035156
File: 84 KB, 960x960, 18739968_1877529645821278_2027403962992008378_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035156

>> No.10035157
File: 71 KB, 720x720, 20108512_1900345063539736_5268265122915903816_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035157

>> No.10035160
File: 340 KB, 1152x2048, 22520250_10155162965792901_505523434518085768_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035160

>> No.10035165
File: 94 KB, 640x960, 12439402_10154128890893217_7547530177777616969.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035165

>> No.10035174

>>10035165
This is ugly, but in an endearing teen ita phase she'll eventually grow out of kind of way

>> No.10035203
File: 242 KB, 1080x1350, rosemaryonette___Bl9TmEYBMIw___.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035203

>>10035141

>> No.10035210
File: 217 KB, 1080x1350, 1542204768676.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035210

>>10035203

>> No.10035212

>>10034589
>>10034600
Guess you got to that anon cause they made another thread just to nitpick this girl
>>10034652

>> No.10035223
File: 499 KB, 750x742, 9AB93904-2DE1-4DA6-A429-A7CEB6A5DCD6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035223

>>10035210

>> No.10035225
File: 553 KB, 750x924, C187963E-4159-4ED2-AD29-32E5369DE72B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035225

>>10035223

>> No.10035227

>>10035072
Details?

>> No.10035229

>>10035156
>>10035157
Sissies btfo. One of these I'll be triggered into killing.

>> No.10035230

>>10035141
she looks like a soundcloud rapper

>> No.10035236

>>10035141
If you watch it, she is. She just wasn't wearing Lolita during the interview. They show several pictures of her coords.

>> No.10035267

>>10035156
>>10035157
>>10035160
I'm not opposed to old-litas (I am one). But we have to work twice as hard to look half as good. Also, I think if you put a sticker over the face of >>10035157 it'll be fine. I'm assuming sissy.

>>10035203
Looks like something KBD would wear.

>>10035223
I'm not a big fan of Lady Sloth Shop's stuff anyway. She hasn't seen a doctor yet?

>> No.10035307
File: 122 KB, 250x333, IMG_9238.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035307

>>10034811
>nasty neons instead of pastels
>weird cheap lace everywhere
>whatever the fuck is going on with those bodice ruffles
Absolutely a replica. Pretty sure it's ripping off pic related.

>> No.10035314

>>10035210
Besides the potentially odd makeup, kind of hard to tell with the lighting, I like this.

Also that shop looks cute as fuck.

>> No.10035323

>>10035210
What's the name of this print? It's v cute. Apart from the makeup/piercings and the boobloafing,it's not a half bad coord

>> No.10035346

>>10034868
Clicking expand on this was a mistake. A fucking tit explosion.

>> No.10035401

>>10035174
I mean, the date says 2013. hopefully she's grown out of it since she's likely no longer a teen.

>> No.10035405

>>10034563
Dear lord I want to do a themed OP coord (SUBTLY) and this makes me want to cry and never come close to trying. STOP.

>> No.10035423

>>10035323
That's AP's Lyrical Bunny. I can't find it on Lolibrary right now for some reason.

>> No.10035434

>>10035210
I think this is the same girl?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LVV1VUs7Z8

>> No.10035461
File: 17 KB, 216x212, 24909667_1804403466245818_6565604041080567355_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035461

>>10034599
Christ on a bike.
I don't know if it was supposed to be her goal to look scary but if it was then good on her because she made it

>> No.10035462

>>10034868
Jesus fuck those are actualy anime tiddies. Also she could be cute if she put effort into it but with those giant boobs she won't ever fit into brand

>> No.10035464

>>10034798
She did it to ‘im

>> No.10035466
File: 24 KB, 424x318, E4C422F3-DAE7-4AF9-BADC-9D962AF5FBDC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035466

>>10035223
Pic related.
Also that makeup is awful and PLEASE do our eyebrows if you’re going to do a close up.

>> No.10035470

>>10035346
Any else ever notice cows with tits like this are constantly bragging about them? What’s the point? Your tits hang down passed your gut and are useless at that point.

>> No.10035535

>>10034589
THIS!!!!!

>> No.10035536

>>10035423
The jsk is lyrical party, only the bag and the accessoires were lyrical bunny

>> No.10035537

>>10035267
The first two pics are almost sure from a sissy, no women has such a face

>> No.10035538

>>10035323

https://lolibrary.org/items/ap-lyrical-party-going-out-set

>> No.10035542

>>10035536
That'd do it. I knew it wasn't quite right.

>> No.10035549

>>10035537

You're right. And I don't mind bio males wearing the fashion, but put on some damn makeup or something--there's tons of tutorials online specifically for men. Even drag-level makeup is better than none.

>> No.10035567

>>10035549

While I like neither, there's something different about a crusty guy without makeup wearing lolita and a fucking sissy, who has this goddamn creepy smile every time he wears it. Fuck sissies man.

>> No.10035582

>>10034575

The look on the husband's face, oh my god.

>> No.10035587
File: 362 KB, 750x718, BE7C3245-B346-4AB8-92C7-A7F36BFBA6FE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035587

Lolita fetish pics

>> No.10035589
File: 292 KB, 750x656, 85F0A252-8C33-4EE2-A1F1-C656CC574EFF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035589

>>10035587

>> No.10035590
File: 616 KB, 750x915, 6D983A24-898A-4BB4-B962-F12F410C9A48.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035590

>>10035589
That’s not how you wear that dress

>> No.10035596
File: 1.26 MB, 1440x1793, e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035596

>> No.10035602

>>10035227
Not that anon, but she constantly posts on Facebook about how she's being attacked, her favorite word, for some reason, is, "keyboard warriors."
She's always posting about her boyfriend and being lonely, and generally digging for attention
She acts really coarse and bitchy when anyone talks to her, too

desu though, I think she normally dresses pretty well, but occasionally has a train wreck outfit like that

>> No.10035727

>>10035203
wtf is up with her tiddies

>> No.10035747
File: 688 KB, 537x737, Shortcake Coord.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035747

This is adorable as cosplay but hideous as lolita. Am I wrong? This is (one reason) why normies are so confused about this fashion.
>I may be a little touchy after an incident a few weeks ago concerning fashion being confused for cosplay, but I don't think I'm wrong about this

>> No.10035762
File: 13 KB, 226x227, 1476764600720s[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035762

>>10035747
I'd say it's more 'fine' than 'adorable' as cosplay (of what?) but in no way would I even consider this lolita. Bad normie wannabe lolita is almost always marked by the notion that any dress with a fitted bodice and a full skirt can be accessorized into a kawaii loli outfit desu ^w^ I guess a lot of modern lolita looks tend towards a more 'princess' vibe than in previous eras, but there's still no way, or need, to make that dress work for lolita.

At the very least, put on a pair of red shoes ffs. What is the twisted logic behind those brown heels???

>> No.10035763

>>10035747
is this not a strawberry shortcake cosplay? lol

>> No.10035803
File: 80 KB, 722x1280, 1F2C2120-3B69-431B-BB8B-72C931AFA8DF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035803

>> No.10035805

>>10035747
I don't like it as cosplay either, the colors don't work. Gross off pink shoes, bright green tights, neon pink petti, and pastel pink. They clash so hard. The peeking petti isn't cute and the wig is too modern for the outfit

>> No.10035810
File: 38 KB, 398x576, 8175266a8cd56491dcb2328098ad4dba.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035810

>>10035762

>> No.10035813
File: 159 KB, 960x694, IMG_0818.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10035813

>>10035762
>not knowing strawberry shortcake
>W E W

>> No.10035814

>>10035803
Was this taken in 2009? It looks like it.

>> No.10035830

>>10035803
>>10035814
Still ita, even by 2009 standards

>> No.10035846

>>10034562
OP it's sad when I personally know the girl in the picture.

>> No.10035847

>>10035589
is she wearing wrist cuffs on top of her bodyline socks? Or am I just an idiot and those are sock toppers (is that even a thing?)

>> No.10035849

>>10035847
Sock toppers used to be a thing, not sure when they rose to popularity (if at all) but I remember seeing tutorials for sock toppers floating around in 2007. They faded out though, which is strange because they're super useful.

>> No.10035850

>>10035830
Didn't claim otherwise, I simply asked.

>> No.10035852

>>10035747
The wig needs to be yarn and the neon pink petticoat must be replaced with white bloomers. Then it would be a pretty awesome strawberry shortcake themed cord/cosplay.

>> No.10035853

>>10035852
>themed cord
No. This isn't lolita and no change would suddenly make it so, least of all wearing a yarn wig.

>> No.10035856

>>10035853
Very well, it could still be a cute strawberry shortcake cosplay then. I suggested the yarn wig because, well, thats what strawberry shortcake's hair is. Yarn.

>> No.10035858

>>10035856
I'm aware of that but that's inappropriate for lolita. Are you a cosplayer? Please lurk more before you comment on a lolita thread again, it doesn't seem like you know anything about the fashion, namely the fact it's a fashion and not a costume.

>> No.10035859

>>10035858
Sorry I flustered your fanny. :^)

>> No.10035861

>>10035858
>namely the fact it's a fashion and not a costume.
if it looks liike a duck, acts like a duck, quacks like a duck... and there are themed cords all the time in lolita(goth, for example is a theme). Someone asked for a rabbit themed one in the capsule thread, why don't you go there and correct them.

>> No.10035862

>>10035861
>having a motif or theme makes a coord a costume
lol

>> No.10035865

>>10035862
Sorry, I know you spent a lot on it but its still a costume. A very pretty costume, but still a costume. Fight me. There is a reason lolita is seen as a costume by a lot(most) of people.

>> No.10035869

>>10035862
I thought you said a themed cord wasn't lolita in >>10035853?

>> No.10035871

>>10035869

She said your idea is costumey, not the idea of a themed coord.

Try to wipe the drool from your face. It's unbecoming.

>> No.10035872

>>10035871
Where does she say that at all in her post? Maybe re-read the sentence.
>>themed cord
>No. This isn't lolita and no change would suddenly make it so, least of all wearing a yarn wig.

>> No.10035874

>>10035872
Anon is right, your reading comprehension needs work.

>> No.10035875

>>10035874
Hmm, I don't think so. I think her sentence needs to be more specific. Why green text "themed cord" if she wasn't referring to it specifically?

>> No.10035877

>>10035875
To directly comment on the fact that it's not and will never be a themed coord because it's straight up cosplay. Does that clear it up?

>> No.10035878

>>10035877
Yes it does, thanks.

>> No.10035901

>>10034614
This is pretty cute. Obviously not lolita so I dunno why this is even posted.

>> No.10035906

>>10035223
What can I say except, you’re welcome

>> No.10035910

>>10034655
>>10035901
Most likely tagged as lolita on her social media when she posted it

>> No.10035917

>>10034916
i think she is wearing a bra..

>> No.10035924

>>10035434
yeah, that's why it was posted along with >>10035203
read the posts they're replying to

>> No.10035962

>>10035747
>>10035852
>>10035861
As someone who has done both lolita and cosplay, let me explain something to you: having a "themed coord" would be akin to a normie wearing a tee shirt depicting a certain holiday/character/whatever. Instead of just a tee shirt, tho, the lolita will stylishly and skillfully incorporate elements of said subject (holiday/character/whatever) into all parts of her outfit. But it's still an outfit meant to be worn as daily wear. There are a few times of the year when the line gets a little blurry (like during the high holy lolita holidays of Halloween and Easter), and OTT may seem like a costume, but that's like a normie dressing up extra nice for a wedding or something. Yes, wigs are involved, but not shiny unnaturally colored wigs.

A costume is a costume. You are dressing AS THAT CHARACTER. It's a lovely cosplay, and I totally get the brown shoes because I'm a vintage toy enthusiast also. But this isn't a dress you would wear to the mall, or out for coffee, or in your daily life. It's not intended to be anything but a costume dress. And with the big poofy hat that is especially not something a lolita would wear. That's the difference.

>> No.10035964

>>10035910
Nope, she posted this on Jfashion internal community -facebook group and never said anything about lolita. People would post anything on ita threads lol.

>> No.10035985

>>10035810
Alright then what was the logic behind wearing a shiny red plastic wig instead of a natural orange

>> No.10035987

>>10035861
S m h gothic is a substyle not a theme. Music is a theme, you can have Harpsichord trio gothic coords, chocolate quartet sweet, or that IW violin OP and bag for a music themed classic coord

>> No.10036018
File: 67 KB, 414x776, kill it with fire.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036018

>>10035985
It honestly looks like a mashup between the old and new strawberry shortcake. Not a berry good idea imo.

>> No.10036031

>>10035861
>goth, for example is a theme
>goth

I'm dying. you're so mad instead of standing corrected.

>> No.10036037

>>10035810
>>10035813
I understood that it was supposed to be strawberry shortcake, but can you really call it cosplay of a character if your costume hardly resembles the source material? Also I admit I did chimp out too hard about the brown shoes, which I didn't realize were canon, but if you're going to completely disregard the costume, why not try to improve it somewhat?

>> No.10036051

>>10036037
>why not try to improve it somewhat?
Or better yet, why not use correct tags instead of #classic lolita, of all things?

>> No.10036069

>>10034575
>If only you knew how bad things really are

>> No.10036076

>>10035236
She still looks awful. Same with her friend.

>> No.10036077

>>10035462
Except anime tits actually look nice.

>> No.10036084

>>10035830
you were not around in 2009 were you?

>> No.10036096

>>10034587
The ivory x white is really the only thing that I'm bothered by, I'd just ditch that blouse entirely honestly it looks so frumpy and draws focus away from the skirt. It's a bit minimalistic otherwise but not ita.

>> No.10036099

>>10036018
underrated pun

>> No.10036116

>>10034595
Something about the way she’s posed creeps me out. She’s giving me bent-neck lady vibes.

>> No.10036166

>>10036084
I was. What's your point?

>> No.10036192

>>10036166
sure anon

>> No.10036204

>>10036192
Sorry you got posted

>> No.10036317
File: 148 KB, 1200x900, C988A200-EA0F-4DFC-9EF3-66E233BCB348.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036317

1/2

>> No.10036319
File: 162 KB, 900x1200, 0C984E51-B579-4189-B930-06E372C4BC03.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036319

2/2

>> No.10036322
File: 261 KB, 1242x1500, 4CAFE10A-303E-41F4-8104-04D1614F25FE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036322

>> No.10036340

>>10036322
What is wrong with that dress? Why is there so little skirt fabric?

>> No.10036378
File: 130 KB, 800x600, 68337160-1C4D-4D5A-B6BE-CADD932E8B8F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036378

I want 2 die

>> No.10036389

>>10036322
Oh man, I saw this guy on insta a while ago. Part of me thinks it's kinda endearing, since he actually seems to get some brand stuff unlike most brolitas, and he seems to actually try, but he also seems a bit ita and needs a little help. I'm not sure if he's trying to look like a woman or not, but I'm kinda doubting if it'll ever work out well for him. instead, I think he should just focus on the lolita part while he's young so he can be flawless in dress as he ages.

>> No.10036403

>>10034801
Nah, she looks more like Jeff the Killer IMO

>> No.10036461

>>10036018
blam
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSa3tAssRM4

>> No.10036477

>>10036319
>>10036317
looks underage
.....
concerned

>> No.10036542

>>10034916
I see her braline through her shirt, I think she just needs a reduction. Sometimes insurance will pay for that if you aren’t morbidly obese, she doesn’t look like a total planet, just kinda fat.
>>10035141
She stated that they totally took her out of context. She does wear the fashion for real. The goth is who I’m worried about, lol.... Tacky as shit, all Killstar stuff.
>>10035223
God I wish this person would quit lolita. I’d never thought people can be “too ugly” for lolita before I saw her.
>>10036319
Oh god stop with the ahegao fails, I’m with >>10036477 I’m concerned about this kid

>> No.10036554
File: 20 KB, 200x200, moana-trsc-clip-thumb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036554

>>10035223

>> No.10036573

>>10035590
To be fair, if I was just handed that dress before I’d gotten into lolita this is how I would have assumed you wore it.

>> No.10036574

>>10035590
she's so cute i would love to put her in some innocent world

>> No.10036576

>>10035901
People post other bad jfashion on here too it’s not just for lolita.

>> No.10036579
File: 2.82 MB, 460x280, A38E9E31-FCF5-414E-9AA4-B33248D96281.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036579

>>10036378

>> No.10036608

>>10036378
Why are Narutards so dead set on turning their male characters in lolitas?

>> No.10036635
File: 376 KB, 750x503, AAF32EF3-B2EF-45E7-8402-3E4F36727996.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036635

>> No.10036638
File: 691 KB, 1068x1068, FB_IMG_15424469971401009.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036638

I am not sure where to begin with this mess.

>> No.10036661

>>10035901
>cute
>gross landwhale looking like trash

Sure

>> No.10036676

>>10036638
I saw this girl on cof earlier and I screeched. poor girl looks so fucking messy

>> No.10036678

>>10036635
i absolutely have no words for this

>> No.10036697

>>10036635
Garbage angel. She flew out of the dumpster with all of the fabric scraps she could carry.

>> No.10036728

>>10036638
I find it slightly difficult to say this as a diehard pokemon fan, but man, between the long mormon face, pulled back hair, and preschool level of dress sense she really does look like a pokemon fan

>> No.10036736

>>10036638
She posted this before. Stop with the fucking black with a light pastel main, nothing matches. Light color or white lolita blouse and tights greatly needed, along with some better shoes

>> No.10036742
File: 91 KB, 600x520, E8ADAC86-0F45-4EEE-A995-6CA9B0460530.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036742

>> No.10036748

>>10036742
So not only is this ita cosplay, they're also confusing [allegedly] lolita fashion with maids? Is that what I'm looking at here?

>> No.10036753
File: 98 KB, 1080x720, Suparimpei Lolita on Instagram_ _Today at _thegran_0(JPG).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036753

>> No.10036757
File: 139 KB, 1080x1350, Suparimpei Lolita on Instagram_ _Today at _thegran_0(JPG)_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036757

>>10036753

>> No.10036761

>>10036635
This is why I don't go to cons. There's the fatties who haven't washed for twelve weeks who brush up to you, and then there's these demons from hell.

>> No.10036762

>>10036742
die sissies, die!

>> No.10036787
File: 514 KB, 750x725, 09422894-0986-4E7D-A5B7-13DCA2C31325.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036787

Lolita cosplayers

>> No.10036790
File: 63 KB, 220x218, 46237890577.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036790

>>10036787

>> No.10036792
File: 315 KB, 750x928, D7FAC5AF-0F20-408B-8FD6-4B1BB12401ED.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036792

>>10036787

>> No.10036796

>>10036753
Is this a promo shoot for whoever made that awful stuff? The bonnets are so huge and unfortunate with the contrasting overlay

>>10036757
This is is so ugly it's almost neat. Like high fashion concept stuff. Why would anyone choose neon green and denim for this style of OTT sweet-classic

>> No.10036797

>>10036796
>OTT sweet-classic
wat

>> No.10036802

>>10036638
The dress itself is super cute and does not deserve this. I like it paired with the eevee bag though.

>> No.10036807

>>10036802
That dress is garbage and everyone knows it

>> No.10036829

>>10036796
http://suparimpeilolita.com/

It is promo for an ugly as sh. indie brand.

>> No.10036858

>>10036792
If not for the wig, I would like this a lot
Not as lolita though

>> No.10036862
File: 260 KB, 1080x1350, 1542412174015.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036862

>> No.10036864
File: 129 KB, 900x623, 8AB9E125-F403-4A09-B9AF-DEF2BAF3A151.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036864

>> No.10036865
File: 384 KB, 1080x1350, 1542470729943.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036865

Taged as lolita

>> No.10036869

>>10036865
Looks Lolita to me. She’s cute, I love her entire look besides the plain white tights.

>> No.10036871

>>10036865
Aw I really like her hair. And the dress looks like the AP Happy Easter apron skirt thing.

>> No.10036888

>>10036864
>autism.jpg

>> No.10036891

>>10036865
This is really cute as casual, daily lolita wear imo

Not a big fan of the piss yellow color in her hair though

>> No.10036903
File: 998 KB, 400x224, tim gunn wtf pose.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036903

>>10036787

>> No.10036910

>>10036865
This is cute fairy kei, I like her hair.
>>10036862
This is in no way lolita.

>> No.10036918
File: 132 KB, 750x944, 14CCE78E-8FD5-436F-812B-DB5EC5856B84.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036918

>> No.10036919

>>10036635
Call me crazy, but I like the concept of the right one. It looks like a jester hat. With proper construction, colors, and execution I think a Venetian jester themed dress would be kick ass.

>> No.10036945

>>10036858
>>10036869
>>10036919
the people here saying these travesties are cute are the real itas.

>> No.10036969

>>10036865
Nitpick, the only problem is that the hair and the coord clash. I like them both separately though.

>> No.10036974
File: 41 KB, 540x960, 46349994_10216051817155640_5259940451913302016_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036974

I hate this chick so much

>> No.10036977
File: 61 KB, 540x960, 46495957_10216051818235667_2209570213467258880_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036977

>> No.10036979
File: 59 KB, 540x960, 46493618_10216051820115714_5914706781669425152_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10036979

>> No.10036980

>>10036974
she has a lot of potential but needs a petticoat like damn girl lemme get u one

>> No.10036982

>>10036787
That shoop makes her look like she's wearing the face of a better lolita. She stole that lolita's dress too, but it's too small and she can't zip it up.
RIP better lolita.

>> No.10036984

>>10036980
No, don't say that. I tried to give her concrit and she didn't take any of it to heart.

>> No.10036990

>>10036979
>collar
Lemme guess, they are also into ddlg or some other degenerate kink?

>> No.10036993

>>10036865
>Clown wig
>Oversized rainbow cardigan

Awful

>> No.10037005

>>10036979
Jfc why can't they keep their collars/tails/... out of lolita? As someone into kinky shit it's not that fucking hard. Plus it never looks good with lolita

>> No.10037009

>>10036993
That’s not a wig you walnut

>> No.10037023

>>10037009
Well, that's unfortunate

>> No.10037051

>>10036858
I think the dress is a VM knockoff and the original design is beautiful, this is just a shitty approximation of it.

>> No.10037094

>>10034868
She would be a great Aunt Jemima.

>> No.10037103

>>10037094
Honey Cake coord when?
More seriously,she's actually cute,but with those huge badonkers she'll have one hell of a time fitting into lolita so I feel bad for her.

>> No.10037104

>>10036638
I need a source on that necklace

>> No.10037110

>>10037103
I feel like if she had any sense of coordination, she could look good in a skirt and highly customized blouse

>> No.10037111

>>10034868
MEGA
I
L
K

>> No.10037138

>>10036990
I don't know if she actually is or not. But the fact that 90% of her outfits (both lolita and not) include her wearing some sort of collar or choker, I wouldn't be surprised.
But I haven't been able to find any actual evidence on either of her insta accounts.

>> No.10037216

>>10036918
yikes

>> No.10037223

>>10036919
I'm questioning your taste levels anon.

>> No.10037264
File: 1.10 MB, 3072x2126, 4AE5BD2F-598E-4B3E-927D-83D630A1CA89.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10037264

>> No.10037266
File: 1.09 MB, 2046x3192, 0A0AE52F-3ECC-4C1D-8C6D-AC9CB1D6B0A7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10037266

>> No.10037268

>>10037264
Doing both too much and not enough makes this hard to concrit. Sweet Lacy Basket girl is the best but no headwear, bad looking socks and overly casual shoes for a fancy dress. Snow boots needs to stop trying so hard, nothing is working. Far left needs better socks that match, nicer shoes, and a simpler hair accessory if she's not going to wear OTT. Classic girl just looks cheap and colorblocked

>> No.10037325

>>10037264
There's a line between ita and nitpick. This pic is it

>> No.10037410

>>10037264
middle left girl is cute and definitely has potential

>> No.10037466
File: 577 KB, 640x1136, IMG_0941.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10037466

can a sales post be ita because i'm fucking rolling at this listing

is that an elizabeth op replica? and that price is absolutely insane. I feel like it's going to desu desu ne at me with really shitty cat ears and ballet flats

>> No.10037473

>>10036974
I used to see this girl around Manchester. There's a lot of shoop on that face, she looks much worse in real life (if possible).

>> No.10037476

>>10036865
I love the little earrings. If this coordinate was in an Asian chick no one would blink.

>> No.10037500
File: 499 KB, 500x200, 1459286728170.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10037500

>>10037466
I feel personally offended by this monstrosity.

>> No.10037592
File: 473 KB, 750x944, F03C6B42-82DB-4BAB-A181-05EB4EB3D6B8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10037592

>> No.10037595

>>10037592
The outfits don't bother me as much as the bad shoop. It's all messed up...

>> No.10037669

>>10037473
Seeing some of her older photos and the weird birthmark she had on her nose, I'm not surprised.

>> No.10037685

>>10035160
The one in pink looks like she calls the cops on black people as a hobby

>> No.10037726
File: 171 KB, 1152x2128, 33F049CF-4C5D-4591-9FF6-EBBE1BA02B0E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10037726

I’m hoping she’s trolling

>> No.10037729
File: 131 KB, 740x750, 8EE3DF3A-1827-46D6-BBE1-C799F07BE017.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10037729

>>10037726

>> No.10037747
File: 101 KB, 191x285, 1473064099945.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10037747

>>10037466
It is. I hate it so fucking much given the Elizabeth OP is one of my dream dresses

>> No.10037799

>>10037747
i mean why would you want the elizabeth op when you have a perfectly fine lace monster right there anon

>> No.10037897
File: 429 KB, 750x725, 924DDC99-5407-4996-9FDF-9D98C48B38AC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10037897

>> No.10037901
File: 776 KB, 750x728, 7BF62B1D-6347-47F5-96EC-E26BB28A1FB4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10037901

>>10037897

>> No.10037916

>>10036865
people are defending this? I think she's pretty but this is a mess...
>>10036862
runescape?

>> No.10038009
File: 473 KB, 1152x2048, B480B440-3CBB-4B72-95BF-5B63D0DC0312.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10038009

>> No.10038013

>>10038009
Sissy and lacemonster

>> No.10038042

>>10038013
name a more iconic duo....I'll wait

>> No.10038061
File: 366 KB, 750x742, 030B911E-29AD-47F0-B2C0-5C9E676C9F01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10038061

>> No.10038083
File: 37 KB, 491x375, 527866_282986565141572_1261735538_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10038083

>>10034665
Why is every "lolita ambassador" like this?

>> No.10038111

>>10036865
Nitpick honestly. Wish her fringe was pastel rainbow instead of bright rainbow to match the cardigan, and some blue or green tights instead of white would really tie it together.

>> No.10038120

>>10038111
nitpick with a nasty ass cardigan that doesn't match a lolita aesthetic at all? okay.

>> No.10038358

>>10038111
Sorry you got posted, but it's trash.

>> No.10038375

>>10038013
The mystery solving duo of harajookoo

>> No.10038377

>>10038358
no, anon. sorry YOU got posted

>> No.10038433
File: 2.74 MB, 750x1334, 156C996E-0497-4E4D-88D9-A24544805508.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10038433

a) why would you use nothing but selfies for your sales pictures
b) girl you look terrible and smelly

>> No.10038529

>>10038433
how do you make holy lantern look so.... classless

>> No.10038543

>>10036542
Oh wow you're right, she is wearing a bra. I just saw the size and figured there was no way. But you're right, maybe losing 20lbs and a reduction would do her some good. She's got great skin and her features are so nice. Too bad about her clothing choices.

>> No.10038544

>>10036753
This looks like a lolita album cover

>>10036757
This looks like a lolita white trash mixtape cover

>> No.10038549

>>10036865
Ugh, I see why someone would see this as ita, but I feel like this could be fixed easily with different legwear, a neutral colored wig, and a different cardigan (or non at all). I see where she put her own style in, but it was in all the wrong ways.

I almost want to photoshop this to see my vision realized, but that seems really shitty.

>> No.10038564

>>10038433
>>10038529
Are you telling me that you've never seen a HL ita before?

>> No.10038565

>>10036865
>>10038549
Anyone else besides me notice the butterfly backpack?

>> No.10038582

>>10038543
Girl she needs to lose more like 120, but yes.

>> No.10038594
File: 631 KB, 750x872, D67EB644-518C-47AD-83F2-9912FA126E8D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10038594

>> No.10038624

>>10038594
Oh god

>> No.10038625

>>10036753
wrong type of chiffon for the bonnets and terrible terrible gathering. you shouldn't be able to see what is behind.
OP on the right has potential but not for lolita. shape and construction looks cute. reminds me of something Candy Stripper would make. 10/10 would wear.

>> No.10038676
File: 352 KB, 1510x1946, 46485314_10218139676146440_6841728236460703744_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10038676

Look who is back

>> No.10038716

>>10034569
I'm a firm believer that a tasteful cleavage can work in lolita, but geez, no one should see half your tits unless you're a slut.

She looks more like she's trying to be some magical fairy than lolita, was this tagged as so? Horrible look no mater what tho. Just look at those tights if that cleavage wasn't bad enough yet...

>> No.10038720

>>10034587
I just wish there was as more white/ivory on her legs feet. Her pale skin and dark hair/make-up makes her look ethereal spooky and I love that vibe.

>> No.10038728

>>10038594

I saw her at the con. Knew someone was gonna post her here lol. Was she trying to go for some kinda deco lolita or something?

>> No.10038730

>>10035003
Unless your representing a brand I don't mind of rand, I'm more wondering why it are always itas who can't coord if their lives depend on it. You need to understand stuff before you can teach it to others...

>> No.10038736

>>10038716
>a tasteful cleavage
no such thing in lolita. you are in the wrong fashion if you think cleavage in any form can be featured.

also, having cleavage out in western fashion does not make one a slut.
your opinions are p. crap.

>> No.10038751

>>10034569
Oh god, I remember some threads ago this exact same dress but on a young cute model, and several other shots in similar dresses to promote some indie "brand" that was utterly clueless about lolita. All the dresses were made of this same, cheap-looking fabric and they all had their cleavage out and pained expressions on their faces like they knew they were wearing crap. Does this mean they actually sold a dress to someone? Wow. I wish I had capped those.

>> No.10038759

>>10035987
All I could do after this comment is imagine someone wearing IW violin OP and some rando being like:
>OMG she's cosplaying a violin!
You made my day. Thanks for the laugh anon

>> No.10038769

>>10036974
I doubt she cares about lolita. Just another run of the mill costhot.

>> No.10038772

>>10038676
Who is this?

>> No.10038799

>>10038676
A girl that was very famous in the last ita thread and even made it in BTB , had on COF a photo that looked very kinky and everyone thought she was a sissy or into dlg

>> No.10038800

>>10038676
are those... wristcuffs on her ankles..?

>> No.10038803

>>10038800
those are the shoes, moron

>> No.10038814

>>10036319
>>10036542
>ahegao fails
Isn't that supposed to look like extreme sexual pleasure? She looks more like she's trying to make a silly face.

I wouldn't say she looks underage. More like could be underage, could also be young adult. But does she even know what ahegao is supposed to be? This feels like she's trying to mimic something she saw cosplayers she likes/thinks are popular do without having a clue what it is. Makes me feel even worse for the girl. Not only failing at a sexualised gesture, but also not knowing she does one.

>> No.10038819

>>10036340
I think there might be shirring on the back that's stretch out so much the skirt becomes "small". I might be wrong, but the front looks folded enough to make me think it's not the construction at the front making it look so flat and strait down, but rather the back being stretched to a circumference not far from the skirt.

>> No.10038823

>>10035590
>>10036573
>>10036574
These comments together are funny because IW Germaine OP is made to be worn like how this dress is supposed to be worn, or off-shoulder like this girl is doing with this dress.

She's on to something, just wrong dress and wrong coord.

>> No.10038824

>>10036579
beautifully ita

>> No.10038829

>>10038676
Why the white bonnet? Not surprising that a kinkster would be bad at old school.
Toddler Telekenisis-chan, you’ve already sullied your name.

>> No.10038840

>>10036787
This looks like she's one of those cosplay facial masks. It looks kinda creepy

>> No.10038844

>>10035141
Okay obviously the producers took her out of context, but ignoring that; honestly, I'm kinda jealous of these two. I'd love a BFF roommate to live with who was also into alternative fashion. We could help each other with makeup and stuff.

I also want a pet snail.

>> No.10038848

>>10036807
Honestly, I never understood why people hate it? I kinda like the design, especially this colourway. My problem is more all the ita's coording it, but that's an issue with most fandom dresses.

I can see this work when worn in a cute girly outfit, without the need to trow pokemon in every bit off accessories. Keep it more subtle and toned down. Probably not even lolita but more general Japanese girly style.

>> No.10038850

>>10036864
what is this? I don't even...

>> No.10038856

>>10036865
I just wish her hair was pastel to fit with the outfit, but as it looks as if it's her real hair dyed, I can forgive it as it's not the worst combo.

Honestly, I feel that this is one of the few times I see tons of light and pastel colours and such dark skin, and even tho it kinda clashes because of the huge contrast, I'm not bothered at all by it. It somehow works quite well. So good job to that lolita.

>> No.10038858

>>10038716
>tasteful cleavage
oh, it’s you again. and no, we still don’t allow cleavage in lolita you larping retard.

>> No.10038865

>>10036918
yikes at furry and yikes at ita. Even more yikes at furry who's human arms show so much. Make it all fur or none, this looks extra ridiculous.

>>10036974
I first thought she was one of those plastic surgery real life dolls girls that where a thing a little while ago. But then I saw the next two picks. Also lols at the huge cleavage here, then none here >>10036979 . Now we know for sure she drew that on in photoshop. Angle can do a lot, but unless she had surgery in between there is no way they look as round and big as in pic one and then as flat and the bodies even a bit loose in pic two.

>>10036990
If she isn't she's still using those who are for the likes and views.

>> No.10038869

>>10037110
No, JSKs or OPs that are made to measure by a brand that actually knows how to make more curvy clothes work better. I've got above average breast but no where near this and I already notice skirts just make it looks bigger by separating chest and lower body so clearly, whereas a well fitting dress makes it more one whole.

Of course that doesn't count for those dresses that look like a skirt with a different body on top. They are pretty, but you kinda loose the "becoming one whole" pro of those items.

>> No.10038875

>>10037592
I like the left swoop although I would have made her nose a bit less pointy, but the right swoop is horrible. It's not even symmetrical. Who over swoops their face without adding the one thing humans are naturally drawn at for perfection? And what's with the flowers on their forehead?

Sorry, I love overdone swoops if they are nice. They look like unhuman perfectionised magical creatures (like Kyohari's pictures). But this is a mess.

I don't even want to think about the outfits, or what's left of them after all the filters.

>> No.10038878

>>10038856
Stop defending this. It's not lolita. It's fairy kei at best, and not even great fairy kei.

>> No.10038907

>>10038875
>swoop
>swoops

it's not called "swoop", moron.

>> No.10038908

>>10038433
I was wondering if anyone would post this. Looks like a trans.

>> No.10038942

>>10034632
Because they either have a shitty petti, or none at all.

>> No.10038943

>>10037726
It's amino, the place of degenerates. You have such a positive hope...

>> No.10038950

>>10038676
all those asspats on CoF made me cringe. She looks bad. Do we have so much ita's or are there so much people sugarcoating who for some reason don't understand you can also just not react to horrible outfits if you don't want to be negative?

>> No.10038956

>>10036753
Is this the Ashleys from Recess?

>> No.10038961

>>10038736
I think a centimetre of subtle cleavage on dresses like Mary Magdalene's Fleur Antoinette can look nice in a good coord. Same with that Hinana Queena rococo dress that has been released a few times now. Just because most itas screw up or people use it as an excuse to wear bad fitting clothes doesn't make the whole idea bad.

I didn't say you're a slut for showing cleavage in general. I said that if you're shirt is so low cut it's half your breast deep that's slutty. There is a lot of marge between showing cleavage and showing half your breast...

>> No.10038966

>>10034632
Brands do it sometimes on stock photo's because they want to show the print on the skirt. Then ita's think they can do the pose to hide that they don't have a (proper) petticoat. Obviously that doesn't work, but if they had any awareness of how stuff looked and noticed it didn't work, they wouldn't be ita's and dress decently in the first place.

>> No.10039005

I stopped reading this thread for awhile because it just kinda devolved into people nitpicking and being mean but holy fuck these are some prime, classic itas. Keep it coming.

>> No.10039006

>>10038676
This is weird and cool. Kind of editorial even.

>> No.10039044

>>10039006
How so? it looks like trash. She can't coord to save her live and the quality of the photo is bad. The only thing at all interesting here is the background.

>> No.10039065
File: 964 KB, 1504x2016, A38D0D42-36D4-4CC8-87C6-331868176CCB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10039065

Christ can this girl please quit lolita already.

>> No.10039138

>>10038848
The people who hate it are always the snobs that knock every lolita dress that's ever inspired by fandom, even when its burando. They call it "poorly constructed" and "ita" just for having Pokemon or Disney characters or whatever the fuck on it, even if its coorded well.

>> No.10039143

>>10039065
Call me crazy, but I think this has potential. She needs a wig to cover up her fried hair, lose the cardigan, and change that horrific headpiece. But it's not a lost cause.
Is there drama associated with her? Because desu she's really pretty, so I don't want her to give up.

>> No.10039157

>>10039143
She kept whining about people giving her concrit when she asked for it. Her hair is always garbage, and she tried to defend wearing gum-covered shoes. She’s hopeless.

>> No.10039167
File: 257 KB, 320x583, 1457686308972.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10039167

>>10038565
I think my brain blocked it out, wow. Yikes, this just hit ita level for me.

>>10038582
Yeah, true. 40lbs is probably closer. It's hard to tell if she's super fat or just top heavy, cause her face is super cute and her skin is enviously clear. I associate most fatties with gross skin.

>>10038716
You sound like an incel larper.

>> No.10039178

>>10039157
Oh? A shame, then. I'd like to see her do better, but there's no changing a shitty attitude.

>> No.10039184
File: 168 KB, 750x719, 42C17CBB-1BAF-4EAE-B782-4441EBD8FB64.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10039184

>>10038529
I have an entire collection of bad holy lantern coords.

Itas and tasteless noobs swarm this print like flies to shit.

>> No.10039187

>>10039178
If I remember correctly, she made another post after her first where she was really salty about getting concrit. I think she might have even likened the concrit to bullying. At any rate it was a classic example of “why can’t I just wear what I want to why are lolitas so mean?”

>> No.10039332

>>10039143
That headpiece is brand. But the lack of bangs makes it look bad. Also, that underskirt doesn't go with that dress and she needs a petticoat. The cardigan looks out of place. And look how the shadows hit her face, she's not pretty, just mediocre.

>> No.10039335

>>10039157
But still we make it up when we say some don't like to give concrit because this happens somewhat regularly and is annoying as a reaction for trying to help. Nah, cgl is just full of meanies instead.

>> No.10039349

>>10038676
The ita cryptid

>> No.10039375

>>10039332
>Implying brands can't put out some fugly-ass shit.
There's literally a thread going on right now dedicated to ugly brand items, lmao.

>> No.10039453

>>10038875
Oh hey swoop-chan. Waiting for someone to post wistywish so you can white knight her some more? Fucking faggot

>> No.10039458

>>10036757
>>10036753
Heh this brand was the first to model at The Grand Embassy and it was like the hosts were trying to get it out of the way as quickly as possible. What an embarrassment

>> No.10039461

>>10035141
Isn't that J? And isn't she like a scammer racist who like sells melanie martinez inspired """""lolita""""" stuff she models on her boyfriend on depop? and who tried to promote her boyfriends music when she got called out for saying racist stuff? ALSO isn't this the SAME girl who is blocked by cherrycheezy for art theft because she was retarded and reposted cherrys art without her permission?

just need to make sure lol

>> No.10039838
File: 103 KB, 750x1201, 92F048B7-B60B-4DA8-80EC-1D96855808AE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10039838

>>10039184
dear god how old is this hog? And why does the dress look dusty is it a replica?

>> No.10039928

>>10039838
Her face looks creepy in this pic but not all that old.

>> No.10039965
File: 1.53 MB, 739x1024, ew..png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10039965

>> No.10039977
File: 120 KB, 750x476, 7BBDF4C8-9EEC-4205-B9F2-0510D4C6A50C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10039977

>>10039965
Don’t forget the worst part anon

>> No.10040063

>>10039977
what in the ever loving hell is a "schizoaffective"

>> No.10040100

>>10039838
Probably the mirror is dirty, which is why it looks "dusty" to you.

>> No.10040101
File: 56 KB, 640x547, IMG_0984.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10040101

>>10040063

>> No.10040141 [DELETED] 
File: 71 KB, 750x502, 5624E5CA-E12E-4594-9E02-46BFA288ECAA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10040141

>>10039977
nah the worst part is her love for Nabokov

>> No.10040273

Next thread >>10040044

>> No.10042101

>>10039375
I know. It's just that I don't hate the headpiece itself and don't think that is the problem here. She just makes it look bad. It's just one of those very lacy rectangle headdresses that BTSSB/AatP releases all the time.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action