Ita Thread: Lolita is for life, not just for Christmas Edition

[Anonymous No.10065857]

[Anonymous No.10065858]

>>10065857

[Anonymous No.10065860]

>>10065858

[Anonymous No.10065863]

>>10065860

[Anonymous No.10065864]

>>10065863

[Anonymous No.10065865]

>>10065864

[Anonymous No.10065869]

>>10065865

[Anonymous No.10065872]

>>10065869
It’s a nice feminine outfit that suits her difficult figure. Not lolita but she could convincingly claim it as a number of other jfashes.

[Anonymous No.10065880]

>>10065860
How does one manage to miss the mark this badly?
>>10065865
Wearing a replica and being a thot. Grosss.
>>10065869
Not lolita but it’s still cute and flattering. I’d wear it on a casual day.

[Anonymous No.10065890]

>>10065858
Too bad because the apron isn't terrible, but the wrist cuffs are lame and she coorded it so badly. I would like to see the same apron coorded well.

[Anonymous No.10065904]

>>10065863
This looks normy af.

[Anonymous No.10065908]

>>10065858
>>10065858
>>10065860
>>10065863
>>10065864
>>10065865
>>10065869
Christ on a cracker these are all awful.

[Anonymous No.10065921]

>>10065880
>cute and flattering
>flattering

[Anonymous No.10065925]

>>10065869
Not lolita but cute! I think the coord needw a cardigan though

[Anonymous No.10065932]

[Anonymous No.10065966]

>>10065932
Again this sh.. why are you trolling each ita thread from this last weeks?

[Anonymous No.10065967]

>>10065966
Because he’s an autist that think he’s funny. Just ignore

[Anonymous No.10065970]

>>10065860
Is that beige/yellow mess supposed to be a skirt? It looks like it’s actually made of garbage.

[Anonymous No.10065990]

>>10065966
Nobody has rated it :(

[Anonymous No.10065998]

>>10065890
You know that's a crop top and skirt from Hot Topic, right?

[Anonymous No.10066010]

>>10065864
her plushie channels my reaction

[Anonymous No.10066023]

>>10065990
its shit
are you happy now
leave

[Anonymous No.10066064]

[Anonymous No.10066065]

>>10066064

[Anonymous No.10066066]

[Anonymous No.10066072]

>>10066065

[Anonymous No.10066074]

>>10066072

[Anonymous No.10066075]

>>10066066

[Anonymous No.10066079]

>>10066074

[Anonymous No.10066081]

>>10066075
I like how colour-balanced this is. If she used better pieces this look could have been super cute. I think with access to proper lolita clothes she would be able to make cute coords.

[Anonymous No.10066084]

>>10066075
Does this dress have two shoulder straps?

[Anonymous No.10066086]

[Anonymous No.10066089]

>>10066086
She looks cute, not ita at all. I think without the tights this would have looked better, especially since she has bare arms. But yeah I'd say a cute coord overall, also she has a cat.

[Anonymous No.10066090]

>>10066081
>>10066084
The dress is a replica.

[Anonymous No.10066092]

>>10066086
It would look good without that bonnet...the bonnet is killing me

[Anonymous No.10066103]

>>10066066
Short spats on top of tall boots makes me sad. Also it appears as though she might have them on the wrong feet, the one on the left looks like it has buttons on the inside.

[Anonymous No.10066104]

[Anonymous No.10066107]

>>10066104
Hahaha, I love how she sneakily tried to hold up her skirt through her sweater pockets so it doesnt look as flat. Just wear a damn petti, lmao

[Anonymous No.10066109]

>>10065865
Dudes always do slutty shit like this in dresses.

[Anonymous No.10066115]

>>10065865
>sissy
>gross pose
at least this is a replica

[Anonymous No.10066142]

>>10066075
S T R O L L E R P A R K I N G H E R E

[Anonymous No.10066153]

>>10066089
oh those tights aren't the problem. It'll look worse without them.

>>10066086 is a nitpick, but there are issues. The bonnet doesn't go with the outfit at all, the shoes would be much better if they're brown, same for the wrist cuffs (especially since the bonnet and wristcuffs are adifferent pink than the roses). Her hair would be better with proper bangs too. Also, the lace on that Bodyline dress is horrible, and although it's not a strait replica, it's an obvious "I tried to mimic the style from looking at IW, MM, and VM" dress. They made a few just-not replica's of classic brands released together with this one.

[Anonymous No.10066158]

>>10065998
You know you're looking at the wrong pic, right?

[Anonymous No.10066162]

>>10066158
Not unless you quoted the wrong original pic. She made that apron from Hot Topic clothes.

[Anonymous No.10066168]

>>10066162
My mistake, but since she took Hot Topic stuff and made an apron out of it, it's no longer a
>Hot Topic skirt
It's a handmade piece and it will be judged as such. So we're back to, the apron is cute, she should learn to coord it properly.

>These threads have already had the fabric origins debate, and it really doesn't matter where the fabric comes from, as long as the resulting piece looks good. Lurk more.

[Anonymous No.10066176]

>>10066168
The resulting piece doesn't look good though. She made a shitty salopette out of shit fabric and is an ita regardless. If you think it looks good then you have horrible taste.

[Anonymous No.10066190]

>>10066153
>oh those tights aren't the problem. It'll look worse without them.
The tights are full coverage and even have a striped texture, which makes me think they might be made of cotton or even wool. They are definitely suited for winter. But she's wearing short sleeves. This combo is what makes the coord look unbalanced. Removing the tights would turn this into a lovely spring coord. Or you could also add a long-sleeved bolero while keeping the tights for a more wintery look.

>the shoes would be much better if they're brown, same for the wrist cuffs (especially since the bonnet and wristcuffs are adifferent pink than the roses)
Ancient pink goes very well with brown especially in a mature-looking coord. Brown could have been okay but I can't see any issue with such an unsaturated, classic pink.

>although it's not a strait replica, it's an obvious "I tried to mimic the style from looking at IW, MM, and VM" dress
This type of dress is such a staple in classic lolita, I think most classic and even non-classic brands made something like this.

[Anonymous No.10066199]

>>10065857
Angle isn't good enough to properly see the coord; I'm calling vendetta.

[Anonymous No.10066201]

>>10065865
Somehow this annoys me infinitely more than your standard milanoo lace monster ita

[Anonymous No.10066204]

>>10066066
For some reason I'm extremely fascinated by examining the bookcase...at least they have good taste in manga and TV shows.

[Anonymous No.10066206]

>>10066075
Oh god, not this thing again.

[Anonymous No.10066207]

>>10066079
This looks like that infamous poster from the "Are All Men Pedophiles?" documentary.

[Anonymous No.10066208]

>>10066115
Wha...this is a sissy? I legit thought it was just an ugly girl.

[Anonymous No.10066220]

>>10066190
first of, as someone who always wears tights or ankle socks, I can tell you these kind of tights come in many materials and not just cotton or wool, and some aren't that warm at all. In fact, holes can make cold wind blow trough easily while the boarding makes it look more opague, which can be nice in summer. Secondly, they are socks looking at those bows. Thirdly, tights/high socks with short sleeves are common in lolita. It's funny you talk about how common the dress is but don't notice how common tights/high socks are with short sleeves. Nothing wrong with covered legs with bare arms. tights are colder than jeans anyways. You also think you can't wear a t-shirt with jeans because long jeans are for winter but a t-shirt is too cold?

There is no problem with ancient pink itself, the problem is it doesn't come back anywhere in the coord beside accessories. And the main colour (brown) doesn't return anywhere in the accessories. It's unbalanced because of that. It's like body and feet/arms/headwear are from two different coords.

It's a staple from classic brands, yes, which is why I can direct it to so many brands. I wouldn't be bothered, if it wasn't that Bodyline didn't make anything like this normally, then released a bunch of almost-but-not-really-replica dresses of these 3 classic brands of which this is one, which I mentioned before. It's not bad in itself, but in an already nitpicky coord it bothers me when it shows the person is cheaping out, especially with so many higher quality alternatives around (as you said, many brands made similar dresses. And many of those don't have that horrible cheap lace and proper lining. So, then why choose this one, which is also in the same size range as other brand ones, if not for being cheaper at the cost of quality, especially since brand is easy to buy nowadays? Cheaping out makes the coord look less good thanks to quality issues. So, visible cheapness becomes one of the nitpick points to mention).

[Anonymous No.10066225]

>>10066208
It’s the face shape that gave it away for me. It’s pretty masculine looking. They did a decent job softening it with makeup but you can still tell.

If by some chance this is a girl then
y i k e s to both that ugly man-like face and that nasty ass ho pose.

[Anonymous No.10066231]

>>10066220
It's because of the brands. VM is shuttered and required a shopping service in the past. Not to mention both VM and MM are extremely hard to fit into if you're not tiny. This isn't just from a fatty-chan perspective - shit is way too small for your average western girl. Part of the reason I stick with sweet and don't branch out to classic even though I prefer classic is because a lot of the classic brands don't even come close to fitting me.

[Anonymous No.10066232]

>>10066220
Are you seriously suggesting a babby beginner lolita could even think of buying a MM/VM dress? Lmao, she obviously chose it as a cheap starter piece like most beginners do, at least it's not a straight up replica. Not a lost case I think

[Anonymous No.10066238]

>>10066231
>>10066232
No I do not, but keep feeling attacked, there are much more brands. You're totally ignoring I also mentioned IW which easy to shop from and has much wider sizing range, and places like WunderWelt and Closet Child, as well as LM. Also indie brands, TaoBao, and any other place that doesn't use $1 rachel lace in a contrasting colour.

Nowadays, it's not even much more expansive to go that way than buying Bodyline. And as other anon also said, these type of dresses are common, and most brands made multiple similar dresses. There is no need to go for this one particular option with cheap lace when there are so many others even within similar price range, unless you want to be cheap and don't want to look into other options.

Honestly, Bodyline is becoming a bad choice even for beginners. There are too many other options of the same price range that are better nowadays.

[Anonymous No.10066240]

>>10066079
she somehow looks dirty

[Anonymous No.10066241]

>>10066220
It doesn't matter whether those tights (or socks) keep really warm, tights (or OTKs) are made for cold weather and you shouldn't pair them with short sleeves. The only exceptions I can think of is if the top is clearly wintery despite having short sleeves or if the legwear is made of see-through lace/fishnet.

>Thirdly, tights/high socks with short sleeves are common in lolita.
I call that bad taste. Unfortunately, being lolita doesn't automatically save you from that.

>There is no problem with ancient pink itself, the problem is it doesn't come back anywhere in the coord beside accessories.
I see what you mean but it's not like your main piece and accessories should always share at least one colour. Ancient pink can be considered a neutral colour so it's easy to pair even with different palettes. It's also a common colour for mature coords and makes them look refined. If she were wearing a bright red bonnet and red shoes she would look way worse imo, too much tacky.

>visible cheapness becomes one of the nitpick points to mention
Come on Bodyline is acceptable especially for a newbie. This is her first try at lolita (said so on CoF), maybe she wanted to see whether she liked it on herself before paying more for brand. This kind of design can also be pretty expensive and difficult to find because it is so loved among classic lolitas. VM and MM pieces are scarce and often overpriced.

[Anonymous No.10066253]

>>10066232
>Are you seriously suggesting a babby beginner lolita could even think of buying a MM/VM dress?

It is not a common first choice but don't make it sound like it is impossible... I'm still a not so experienced lolita and my first two dresses were Victorian Maiden and Mary Magdalene. I wasn't even one of the "followed lolita for 102830 before actually getting into the fashion". It's totally doable you just have to be thin and study a little.

[Anonymous No.10066254]

>>10066253
*years

[Anonymous No.10066258]

>>10066240
it's probably the shitty lighting

>>10066241
welcome back arizona-chan.

Nobody who matters gives a fuck if you wear warm stockings and short sleeves or long sleeves and short socks. The only thing that matters is whether or not you personally feel comfortable in whatever environment you're dressed for.

Find something more relevant to nitpick jfc.

[Anonymous No.10066261]

>>10066253

>my first two dresses were Victorian Maiden and Mary Magdalene
LMAO, sure. Unless you mean replicas. Then maybe.

>It's totally doable you just have to be thin and study a little.
And have a bunch of cash you're willing to spend on something you're not sure you're gonna like.

[Anonymous No.10066262]

>>10066253
Sounds like you're a person who goes balls-deep in every little thing that catches your interest (not a healthy way of going about an expensive hobby like lolita, even if it's acceptable for hobbies like fandom), you have too much money burning a hole in your pocket, or Daddy buys everything for you.
Picking indie, taobao and/or Bodyline for starter pieces is acceptable; no one should have to buy head-to-toe brand for their very first coord, especially if they don't know if they'll want to continue wearing lolita. My first coord was all Bodyline and off-brand, then I gradually began buying more brand pieces as time went on.

[Anonymous No.10066267]

>>10066261
>>10066262
I hope you're samefagging otherwise it means there is not one but two anons acting butthurt for no reason. In the babylita thread I remember other people mentioning VM or MM as their first pieces, it's not that impossible at all. But feel free to believe they all bought replicas or throw money at the first thing that interest them.

[Anonymous No.10066268]

>>10066267
also, I knew I was gonna like Victorian Maiden and Mary Magdalene from the first second I saw them <3 And if you own something by them you will understand what I mean.

[Anonymous No.10066271]

>>10066261
>>10066262
... seriously? Nayrt, but some of the first dresses I fell head over heels in love with were from VM or MM, and I would have kept loving them even if I later decided lolita wasn't "my thing". many of them can be worn in relatively toned down, non-lolita ways anyways. I would have felt the same way if I found a designer dress I loved that much, and they're normally more expensive. 300-ish dollars isn't even that much for a dress you really love, and a lot of their pieces go for way less than that. I'm sorry you're poor and don't know what you like, I guess.

[Anonymous No.10066273]

>>10066262
>being this butthurt

[Anonymous No.10066277]

>>10066176
>can't tell the difference between a saloupette and an apronskirt

Geez, how new are you?

[Anonymous No.10066280]

>>10066277
>saloupette
At least spell it right if you're trying to correct and "how new are you" someone, salt-chan. Also a salopette is technically any skirt/pants with straps that go over your shoulders/neck, so try again.

[Anonymous No.10066295]

>>10066271
And sorry you're an impulsive teenager that points at something pretty and goes "but Daddy, I want it NOW" instead of starting small and working your way up to the big bucks. It makes sense for a newbie to like the way lolita looks, but to try it and realize that actually wearing it isn't for them, for whatever reason. Looking at and admiring coords is quite different from building and executing a coord on your own. So it makes sense for a newbie to buy less expensive stuff like taobao, so that in case they learn through experience (like a normal human being) that it's not for them, they didn't drop a couple hundred on a dress.
And as for buying on LM and such, I recommend that newbies DON'T do that, because they don't know what these dresses are really worth yet and run a high risk of being scalped.
Also LMAO if you'd buy a designer dress just cause it looks pretty. You must have a closet full of stuff that you never wear but you bought just because it looks nice. Have you seriously never thought to yourself, "I like this, but I don't have any place where I could wear this"?
I guess being a poorfag and being someone who knows how to manage large, luxury purchases is the same?

[Anonymous No.10066299]

>>10066258
>The only thing that matters is whether or not you personally feel comfortable
I thought lolita was about looking good but okay, feel free to wear that combo and find yourself in the ita thread.

And I'm not nitpicking, can you even read? Does this >>10066089 sound like nitpicking to you?

Also why the fuck Arizona-chan

[Anonymous No.10066300]

>>10066295
>don't buy good brands if you're a newbie
>buy taobao and bodyline shit
>that way you won't lose your money in case you don't like it
>which you probably won't cause the quality is bad
>and not representative of lolita
>but hey at least you paid only 50usd for that piece of polyester shit

[Anonymous No.10066308]

>>10066295
You have to stop projecting so hard, it's embarrassing. If a newbie does their research and has the money to afford the brand they like right from the start, why the fuck shouldn't they get it? Because it makes you feel insecure? You're pathetic.

[Anonymous No.10066351]

>>10066241
>I call that bad taste
Luckily your taste doesn't determen the fashion. If you're gonna give concrit or nitpick, you need to be able to recognise own opinions. It's never been a bad thing to wear tights without long sleeves. You can hate the look, but there is no rule against it.

>it's not like your main piece and accessories should always share at least one colour. Ancient pink can be considered a neutral colour so it's easy to pair even with different palettes.
But they still should match somewhere. If there is no link between your accesouries and actual coord it stops being cohesive. Fabrics, colours, style. It's all slightly different here. Looks like two different coords.

>This kind of design can also be pretty expensive and difficult to find because it is so loved among classic lolitas. VM and MM pieces are scarce and often overpriced.
IW has made tons of this type of dresses too, which is less expansive, similar sizing as this Bodyline one, and easier to get. I also never said it needed to be brand and even mentioned that TaoBao and Offbrand/indie brands also have tons of typical classic options. Get over the damn VM and MM like it's all I said. And it's not scare, it's so often made in so many variations that it's easy to find some if you look around.

Bodyline being acceptable is true, altrough even then it's always been some items are ok, some not. I also already explained this:
>Cheaping out makes the coord look less good thanks to quality issues. So, visible cheapness becomes one of the nitpick points to mention
You can't sell me that lace, especially not after telling me there are so many similar garments on the market. That lace is bad no matter where it comes from. That unlike a few years back, I think there is no reason for that anymore since prices have gone up and better options have become available in the same price range was a personal opinion indeed.

Are you the one posted? You sound insanely butthurt about it.

[Anonymous No.10066353]

>>10066295

I think it's for the best that a newbie buy burando for their first dress. Even $50 for one dress is a lot when you're young, especially for minors without full time jobs.

When they their first dress from Taobao or Milanoo or whatever and they get some rank looking trash they might be totally discouraged. I do see burando quite often in decent condition on LM, very accessible for beginners, for $100 or under. Even slightly damaged, I find it's pretty much always a better buy than Bodyline.

My first two dresses I bought were Taobao indie brands and absolute garbage. I regret thinking I could cut corners. I only continued (and bought my first brand) because I had been followed lolita for a billion years, and so had a little experience. I decided to begin building a wardrobe with mostly brand and I am so happy with it now.

I honestly believe making a quality piece as your first impression will make all the difference.

Plus, like someone else mentioned, if you get a great quality piece and decide lolita isn't for you, it shouldn't look like a costume with that cheap raschel lace and you'll be able to wear it in non lolita fashion. Plus, the resale value will be greater.

[Anonymous No.10066355]

[Anonymous No.10066357]

Stop derailing the thread you faglords.

If you're going to argue and project, at least post pictures with it.

This was posted with the #sweetlolita tag on IG.

[Anonymous No.10066358]

[Anonymous No.10066359]

[Anonymous No.10066366]

>>10066358
Probably just people using the related hashtag tool desu

[Anonymous No.10066372]

>>10066358
#fuckyourpaleaesthetic

[Anonymous No.10066374]

>>10066299
Obviously meant that in regards to comfort... Whether or not you're dressed appropriately for the weather (according to someone else's personal standards and tastes) has literally nothing to do with how well-coordinated your outfit is. Mixing fall and spring accessories does not an ita make.

Lolita is an everyday fashion. Coords will be bent to each individual's needs and preferences. What matters is if it still looks good beyond that: Are the colors and textures well balanced? Are there clashing themes or patterns? Is it flattering? Does it capture the lolita aesthetic?

If you think warm tights are the reason >>10066086 was posted, you're missing the point.

(In their defense, that OP is a tough one. Anything that uses both white and ivory/cream as prominent colors is a nightmare to coord early on.)

[Anonymous No.10066413]

Guess if I want content I’ll have to upload it myself

[Anonymous No.10066427]

>>10066413
For a good minute I thought she was my local library’s librarian who thinks she’s alternative, only this girl isn’t so fat

[Anonymous No.10066458]

>>10066086
I feel like this was the gull shitting on 3F bonnets in another thread
That bonnet looks like the etsy bonnet they recommended

[Anonymous No.10066464]

>>10066104
Is this mexico-chan again?

[Anonymous No.10066465]

>>10066086

[Anonymous No.10066474]

>>10066427

[Anonymous No.10066480]

>>10065932
ur waifu is cute now stfu

[Anonymous No.10066481]

>>10066065
>dream catcher
>English flag
kek

[Anonymous No.10066491]

>>10066086
What are those bangs???

[Anonymous No.10066494]

>>10066357
Wow, there is so much going on here.

[Anonymous No.10066503]

>>10065857
Good ita thread for once with what looks like no nitpicks so far. Good job gulls I’m proud

[Anonymous No.10066512]

>>10066066
Ok honestly she always looks super awkward, and it’s not just because the outfits are bad. I do think she should work on nailing down basic coords first before trying weird stupid steampunk mashups (like her other poorly dressed “steampunk” friend), but working a bit on her posing/smiling would also do wonders.

[Anonymous No.10066535]

>>10066512
that's not a she anon

[Anonymous No.10066539]

>>10066066
This is a mashup mess.
Also, crusty tights are crusty.

[Anonymous No.10066540]

>>10066153
I own both MM Whyteleafe and VM Classical Doll, which are so similar they could be replicas of each other, and this Bodyline dress. I also have the Bodyline velvet dress that resembles MM St. Claire. A dress with a yoke is not unique by any means, whether a burando made it or not. I fit into and can afford MM and VM (my first dress 5 years ago was MM Whyteleafe, in fact) but like having a few Bodyline dresses for washable options that fit my aesthetic. And FYI, the quality of this dress is not far away from lines like VM Beth or most of IW.

[Anonymous No.10066548]

>>10066540
Not that I think the coord in question is good. I have been wearing classic for a long time and feel confident about matching pieces to my style; I doubt this person ever wore her “replica” outside.

[Anonymous No.10066550]

>>10066066
is this an unfortunate looking woman, or a dude?

[Anonymous No.10066551]

I really need some goths who try lolita ita's, just coz its funny.

[Anonymous No.10066554]

>>10066427

>>10066474
kek this made my day anon. I was just thinking the same thing.

[Anonymous No.10066558]

>>10066554

[Anonymous No.10066560]

>>10066558

[Anonymous No.10066562]

>>10066560
the closer you look the worse this gets

[Anonymous No.10066566]

>>10066562
I don’t know much about goth, but this doesn’t look goth or lolita

[Anonymous No.10066568]

>>10066413
Why does she look like a character in Supernatural that's been possessed by a demon?
Pic related.

[Anonymous No.10066569]

>>10066566
Silly anon, don't you know that anything black is automatically goth?

[Anonymous No.10066570]

>>10066566
So many itas

[Anonymous No.10066571]

>>10066570
the bro in the front wearing his work shirt as a blouse lmao

[Anonymous No.10066572]

>>10066570
I remember seeing the girl on the right in this thread before.
Can't forget that meme-worthy awkward smile.

[Anonymous No.10066588]

>>10066570
I feel sorry for the well dressed ones. I would feel awful in with so many itas.

I can see 2-3 good? The 2 far left and one in the middle?

srsly. If it were my comm I'll just ghost lighting all the awful ones.

[Anonymous No.10066594]

>>10066104
Goats with my fave bodyline dress. Loool

[Anonymous No.10066595]

>>10066458
She said in the CoF post she made it herself. Not sure if that makes it better or worse though

[Anonymous No.10066599]

>>10066262
My first coord was an AP jsk with bodyline blouse and socks plus taobao shoes. You can start of with brand it is not that hard, I paid for that first jsk around 6000-7000 yen with shipping. Actually i bought the first bodyline main piece only after I had some brand jsks.

[Anonymous No.10066605]

>>10066566
Oh man I just sew her pop up on instagram under #gothiclolita #lolitafashion tag, made me cringe so much

[Anonymous No.10066618]

>>10066570
sissy in the front and in a replica?

[Anonymous No.10066627]

>>10066568
>she
That's very clearly a dude.

[Anonymous No.10066629]

>>10066540
>And FYI, the quality of this dress is not far away from lines like VM Beth or most of IW
>a Bodyline dress with visible the cheapest of cheap lace.
Yeah, nice try.

[Anonymous No.10066632]

>>10066570
>>10066571
My eye was drawn to the exact same person, anon. She looks like a fat Dave Grohl or something, jesus.

[Anonymous No.10066650]

>>10066253
Don't listen to these losers anon.
>>10066261 is just an idiot and >>10066254 is a jelly poorfag.

My first piece was MM too, bought straight from the BST thread here.
I then I felt bad for not going the 'babbys first lolita dress' route and bought two pieces from bodyline, both which I hated and wore maybe once each before getting rid of them.

So I totally agree with you, as long as you study and are financially capable, brand as a first purchase is not a far leap.

[Anonymous No.10066658]

>>10065865
Kill it b4 it breeds.

>>10066261
Are you retarded? How is that so unlikely? Not that anon, but I didn't get into the fashion until I had a lot of disposable income, and only ever bought brand, also classic because that seemed easiest to start with and the least OTT. Second hand MM OPs and JSKs from CC or WW at first, but never bodyline, never replicas, and not even taobao because I've got all the brand, new as well as second hand I need now.

[Anonymous No.10066660]

>>10066295
Not all of us get into the fashion when we're still living off of "daddy". Jesus. You don't have to be fourteen to be relatively new.

[Anonymous No.10066661]

>>10066660
yeah she clearly has some unsolved issues
it was a while since i read someone projecting this bad on cgl

[Anonymous No.10066662]

[Anonymous No.10066669]

>>10066629
To be fair, I did take off the gold lace. The construction is definitely on par with Beth, which is almost always unlined.

[Anonymous No.10066681]

>>10066540
>And FYI, the quality of this dress is not far away from lines like VM Beth or most of IW.
Whenever I say that some Bodyline pieces are not that much worse compared to brand I never get taken seriously so I'm glad someone agrees. Of course you can see brands are higher quality but yeah, some BL pieces are definitely not that far. The unicorn JSK print is better than one of an old AP skirt I own, for example, in that the AP one looks extremely washed out/blurred. One of my BL OPs even has the exact same lace as a VM JSK I own (they're totally different dresses so it's not a replica or something). The VM one is 100% cotton while the BL one I think is cotton blend, but apart from that there is no other difference. Sometimes I think if BL used 100% cotton/better materials it would be on par with brand (maybe not with VM, but with some lower quality Jap brand). Note: I'm not talking about BL as a whole but only for their okay pieces. Some are trash even design-wise and you should burn them.

[Anonymous No.10066717]

>>10066550
I think they're a dude, though judging by the fact they're not posing like a slut I have hope that they're a proper male lolita and not a sissy in lolita clothing.

>>10066066
IMO, the formless, baggy, tubular sleeves don't go well with how angular the shoulders are. It makes it look like there's no arms in them and like their hands are held in place by the cuffs. Kind of creepy. I think they should ditch the spats, get red tights or leggings and maybe bend at least one of their arms when posing so it's obvious there are elbows hiding in that blouse.

[Anonymous No.10066732]

>>10066540
As someone who ALSO owns a bunch of MM/VM (including whyteleafe), I don’t understand how you can compare. St.Claire is much closer to Classical Doll, whyteleafe is rounded and this bodyline dress is clearly trying to emulate that specific dress (with an extra bit of border lace). Classic dresses are all about the details, and this one is close enough to look like a cheapo replica to me. Whyteleafe is also one of the more generously sized MM pieces (without going into shirring territory), you aren’t flexing for being able to fit into it. The bodyline piece looks similarly sized.

This isn’t what’s wrong with this coordinate by a long shot, but kids these days don’t know how to look for a design replica without there being a border print involved.

Also
>comparing IW to VM’s fast fashion line and bodyline
I’m insulted for IW but based on their newer stuff you’re right.

[Anonymous No.10066736]

Would you turbo nerds take this discussion to the general thread or post photos? God damn.

[Anonymous No.10066742]

>>10066560
Not ita, but it's so casual why even post it? Her feet are fucking terrifying though.

[Anonymous No.10066751]

>>10066662
Isn't this the dude who does gay AVs?

[Anonymous No.10066832]

>>10066662
Vendetta post? Sara we know you hate Akira but grow up
>>10066618
Yep

[Anonymous No.10066835]

>>10066751
nah rosaire spread that because she had some kind of beef

[Anonymous No.10066852]

>>10066535
I have met her in person, and can confirm that she is a she.

[Anonymous No.10066866]

>>10066852
>I have met her in prison, and can confirm that she is a she.

Misread this and was very confused

[Anonymous No.10066879]

>>10066560
is this that super anorexic french girl, or whatever from yt?

[Anonymous No.10066912]

>>10066570

[Anonymous No.10067017]

>>10066879
she has a yt? lolita Eugenia Cooney

[Anonymous No.10067021]

>>10066359
There is no coordinate here to critique, take your vandetta to the bad makeup thread.

[Anonymous No.10067071]

>>10066427
I fucking hate waist belts like this with a passion. They make 90% of coords they touch look like a cheap ass Hot Topic dress.

[Anonymous No.10067081]

Found this gem on insta

[Anonymous No.10067088]

>>10067081
Girl desperately needs a new head, if it weren’t for that this would look decent. Based on the one pic of her I saw on her insta, she’d actually make a very cute lolita without the furry stuff.

[Anonymous No.10067096]

>>10067088
Well, she is wearing a full set so there's not much that could go wrong here when it comes to coordinating

[Anonymous No.10067099]

>>10067081
This chick gets posted so often now I’m getting convinced she’s self posting for attention

[Anonymous No.10067104]

>>10067081
Last thread
>>10064843

[Anonymous No.10067116]

>>10066681
>>10066540
The thing is it looks fine worn, and might look similar in general. But if you actually look at the sewing techniques used, the way the finishing is done, the materials used, it's really far below brands like MM and VM. If you try to take these dresses apart, even without being a seamstress, you'll notice a few things easily. Like Bodyline just trowing everything on then sews it once, maybe in two steps at best, whereas those brands are often having each part carefully sewn, then attached to each other one by one, all with thier own seams perfectly placed. The way the hems are finished, the lining that's used, the way the fabric is woven and the actual material (not just cotton or polycotton, as those also differ in quality). It's all done on a so much more simple, cheaper, and easier way when it comes to Bodyline pieces, which will cost them quality points and people who know what to look for will notice it, and in the long term, it'll last less long. People don't take you serious because when you look at these things, Bodyline is like fast fashion at it's best moments, and like a costume at it's worst. Where the better brands is more in the middle in terms of garment quality (because no, they aren't high end either).

[Anonymous No.10067128]

>>10066086
>cuddling a cat
>the cat's trying to push her away

[Anonymous No.10067202]

[Anonymous No.10067209]

>>10067202

[Anonymous No.10067239]

>>10067209
this really takes me back

[Anonymous No.10067241]

>>10067239
This skirt looks fucking awful. I really hope she didn’t leave the house like this.

[Anonymous No.10067245]

>>10067241
This thing haunts my nightmares

[Anonymous No.10067248]

>>10067245

[Anonymous No.10067250]

>>10067248
How is this old school in any way

[Anonymous No.10067282]

>>10067250

[Anonymous No.10067286]

>>10067282
What even are these colors

[Anonymous No.10067287]

>>10067286
Apparently most of this is on-brand but it looks so terrible

[Anonymous No.10067298]

>>10067287
I think her corset is upside-down

[Anonymous No.10067307]

>>10067298
>>her

[Anonymous No.10067317]

[Anonymous No.10067324]

>>10066627
Implying there aren't women with faces that unfortunate?
Anyway, man or woman, they still look like they're possessed by a demon.

[Anonymous No.10067325]

>>10066912
Thank you anon, that was the reaction image I was looking for.

[Anonymous No.10067326]

>>10067081
Please stop posting this one, it's getting old and the shock wore off long ago.

[Anonymous No.10067327]

>>10067128
You've clearly never owned a cat if you think that's even worth commenting on.

[Anonymous No.10067359]

[Anonymous No.10067360]

[Anonymous No.10067361]

>>10067360
He looks better than she

[Anonymous No.10067362]

>>10066570
I think I know one of the girls

[Anonymous No.10067364]

>>10067360
She looks ita as hell, but seems so happy it's cute. Ita-cute.

[Anonymous No.10067457]

>>10067317
Mediocre top half but scrolling down to that sandal reveal knocked the wind out of me

[Anonymous No.10067460]

>>10066075
>
How on earth does someone make a Lolita dress look like it has no silhouette.

[Anonymous No.10067464]

>>10067359
Long

[Anonymous No.10067476]

>>10067359
Is that bow for real?

[Anonymous No.10067477]

>>10067460
By wearing a replica, duh

[Anonymous No.10067478]

I know posting voldie is cheating, but this whole coord is a big mess

[Anonymous No.10067482]

>>10065857
from reddit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRBw6xi9lkY&feature=youtu.be&ab_channel=TCake

[Anonymous No.10067485]

>>10067482
This makes me sad because she has potential but since this is probably just another attention outlet for her and the reddit kids will eat it up she has no real incentive to move beyond shitty wish purses and meme makeup

[Anonymous No.10067489]

>>10067485
What bothers me is that she has other video giving people "tips" on lolita coord

[Anonymous No.10067491]

>Love the lolita look and always had an attraction to it.
>Come to this thread and lose the interest as i realize how fucking rare it is for anyone attractive to actually dress up in this sort of clothing
It's not fair bros. Just isn't fair at all.

[Anonymous No.10067494]

>>10067491
Do you even know what an ita thread is?

[Anonymous No.10067496]

>>10067494
No, i just saw it on the front page.

[Anonymous No.10067498]

>>10067496
It's pretty much the thread where we post bad outfits and people that miss the mark by a long shot. Here are where the failures end up basically.

[Anonymous No.10067499]

>>10067498
Oh thank god. That makes much more sense then.

[Anonymous No.10067503]

>>10067499
Also FYI literally noone gives a shit if you find these people attractive

[Anonymous No.10067507]

[Anonymous No.10067508]

>>10067287
?? What is brand, the blouse? Nothing else is even lolita. The skirt is too short, is it naoto? I don't really consider them "brand" because they make so much stuff that's just punk or alt fashion and not lolita appropriate. I know the shoes and corset are nothing, they aren't loliables no matter how many people shoehorn those ugly ass boots in

[Anonymous No.10067512]

>>10067491
Quite a number of the girls posted so far are really attractive though. They just need varying degrees of help dressing.

[Anonymous No.10067521]

>>10067478
It's not totally awful. But I had to collage some of the comments on CoF about loving the mustard color (even tho there's hardly any in the main piece, shoehorn fail). Do gulls lie and asspat the wrong things just to keep others from improving? Shame.

That last comment, tho, is truth. Spinelli-kei.

[Anonymous No.10067523]

>>10067478
>>10067521
Not gonna lie, I like this. I'd maybe get similar socks with a pattern/texture/lace embellishment, and maybe oxfords instead of the simple feminine shoes, but the mustard serves as a balance (not a match, but a similar feel) for the buttons and light details throughout the dress.

Overall it has a nice feeling and I wouldn't be ashamed to be seen in public with her so imo nitpick, not ita.

[Anonymous No.10067525]

>>10067523
I agree with liking the consept of mixing in mustard (a colour I love) however it needs to be done in a better way. Better shoes too.

[Anonymous No.10067596]

>>10067324
Even that's a stretch.

[Anonymous No.10067622]

>>10067478
If the beanie was a beret, this would be a lot better. At it currently stands, it feels TOO casual but I enjoy the colors together.

Wouldn’t say it was ita.

[Anonymous No.10067627]

fluffykawaiijoe thinking that she can be a model for angelic pretty when she's not pretty is pretty fucking ita to me

[Anonymous No.10067635]

>>10067627
She’s witchier than Lor, goodness. But I also think Risa Nakamura is ugly af. She looks like a dead fish.

[Anonymous No.10067639]

>>10067521
>this is very my daily style
kek SJR stop pretending you're a Lolita

[Anonymous No.10067641]

>>10067491
Why would you use an ita thread as a judgement of what the general lolita population looks like?

[Anonymous No.10067642]

>>10067491
Also, ew, fuck off perv

[Anonymous No.10067643]

I would give this a pass because holy lantern sucks but the whites don’t even match

[Anonymous No.10067645]

>>10067627
She's very old, but she's nice and popular. Who cares as long as she fits the dresses?

[Anonymous No.10067654]

>>10067643
That boob loaf. Is this a replica?

[Anonymous No.10067657]

>>10067654
Boob loaf isn’t a replica detector.

[Anonymous No.10067660]

>>10067657
No, but I was under the impression that HL was quite small.

[Anonymous No.10067661]

>>10067482
At least her vag is getting a bit of air.

[Anonymous No.10067667]

>>10067660
Uh no. It has full back shirring. Do you even Lolita??

[Anonymous No.10067671]

>>10067667
Yeah, I honestly just assumed as I've seen so many fattys in replicas. It's not my style so I don't know the measurements. Sorry!

[Anonymous No.10067679]

>>10067202
Simplicity Strikes Again

[Anonymous No.10067702]

>>10066074
Why are most of Sailor Moon fans so tacky? desu it makes me dislike that franchise even more.

[Anonymous No.10067709]

>>10067287
people always mix up gothic club look of 2007 with gothic lolita. dunno why...

[Anonymous No.10067720]

[Anonymous No.10067722]

[Anonymous No.10067724]

[Anonymous No.10067726]

>>10067720
not ita

[Anonymous No.10067727]

[Anonymous No.10067748]

>>10067627
Her nose is probably the most unfortunate one I’ve ever seen.

[Anonymous No.10067752]

>>10066866
LOL made my day, thanks anon. It would have been hellishly weird to meet her in prison.

[Anonymous No.10067757]

>>10066066
She( he?) looks soo crooked. But I can’t help but cringe at the horde of manga. I had a manage phase. But it wasn’t this extensive. I had maybe three or four series and some one or two book series. Not enough to fill book selves upon bookshelves with manga. Why is it weebs like this are also into steampunk? And my money is on this person is also a furry and plays Pokémon like it’s a religion.

[Anonymous No.10067765]

>>10067757
Don’t feel like opening the pic, but there’s plenty of manga with literary merit. I’d be as happy to fill a library with good manga as with good books.

[Anonymous No.10067769]

>>10067720
Nothing is wrong with this.

[Anonymous No.10067771]

>>10067765
I’m not saying that the content was bad ( although some of them are not my flavor of literature). It’s the extensive amount of it that makes me cringe. It’s filling what looks like three bookshelves of manga double stacked in some places. That’s a LOT of manga. Only people that do that are hard core weebs that more often then not smell of B.O. and usually are the “ squeeeeee black butler yaoi” types. I’m reading soo much into an image. I know. But she dresses rather poorly and have the general flags of a cringy weeb you try and stay away from.

[Anonymous No.10067772]

>>10067727
Not really sure what makes this ita? It looks like a pretty cute beginner coord.

[Anonymous No.10067773]

>>10067757
Dude, let people enjoy things.

[Anonymous No.10067777]

>>10067757
>>10067771

This sounds stupid. It's like thinking someone who owns a lot of lolita dresses is a spoiled brat full of themselves.

[Anonymous No.10067780]

>>10067773
>>10067777
Found the weebs.

[Anonymous No.10067800]

I just really hate lazy coords like this. The deflated, short ass dress. The unmatching, unconcealed tattoos. Completely random bag & lace wristcuffs. Looks like she just blindly grabbed a bunch of random shit from her wadrobe and headed out

[Anonymous No.10067807]

>>10067287
Is that corset upside down?

>>10067359
toothpick legs

>>10067643
the jesus on her phone knows it's ita.

>>10067720
>>10067722
what the fuck is wrong with you?

>>10067724
Nitpick. If she actually used that hair curler she's standing next to this would be so much better.

[Anonymous No.10067814]

>>10067807
>Is that corset upside down?
Yep it sure is. I know some men who find that corsets fit better upside-down but this person appears to have breasts so

[Anonymous No.10067851]

>>10067654
I believe it’s real
>>10067657
Actually the replicas tend to boob loaf worse than real AP, whether they’re standard size or custom tent sized. That, or they gap
There’s no in between
>>10067720
This is cute u salt cunt
>>10067722
I hate the headpiece but this isn’t exactly ita
>>10067724
Maybe needs a binder because of loafing, definitely needs makeup and hair. But this isn’t ita imo.
>>10067727
Is that fluffykawaiijo again? She’s a bit tall to model for AP then no? This looks very beginner-ish, vaguely old school sweet. I like her tho and her coords aren’t really “ita.” Being conventionally attractive really is not everything

[Anonymous No.10067854]

Her sewing is getting slightly better but god does she need to learn to pose and smile properly, in addition to other things.

[Anonymous No.10067856]

[Anonymous No.10067859]

>>10067854
and holy shit this angle made me shoot water out of my nose

[Anonymous No.10067860]

>>10067859
everything about this is depressing

[Anonymous No.10067879]

The normie blouse, cheap peignoir and lack of hair accesories push this into ita territory for me.

[Anonymous No.10067880]

girls: work hard to stay modest and demure in lolita
guys: >>10065865

[Anonymous No.10067885]

>>10067879

I’m usually all aboard the plum Chan hate train but this has potential imo. It looks very light and floaty and if she changed the blouse out to something as frilly and light, and readjusted the corset we might be onto something.

[Anonymous No.10067890]

>>10067879
I was gonna post this, none of the colors and fabric textures go together

[Anonymous No.10067891]

>>10067851
>Is that fluffykawaiijo again?
Anon, I hate to break it to you, but you might be legally blind.

[Anonymous No.10067893]

>>10067885
I think if this wasn’t on a stick thin Asian girl it’ll be pretty ita. That said maybe if she took out the underwear peignoir and changed the blouse to an actual lolita one it might look better. And remove the corset because right now it’s just emphasising her lack of tits.
Also maybe a headbow or something, even that pancake hat she always wears would work here.

[Anonymous No.10067895]

>>10067478
I never heard of her, where can I get the tea on her?

[Anonymous No.10067896]

>>10067503
I mean, that's kinda the whole point of this thread is this people are unattractive...clearly you care if you're even here in the first place.

[Anonymous No.10067897]

>>10067896
No, it's for people who are bad at coordinating lolita outfits. What are you doing here?

[Anonymous No.10067899]

>>10067726
It's not a total disaster but there are some pretty cringeworthy choices here.

[Anonymous No.10067903]

>>10067897
Badly-done coords = unattractive.
I don't care how naturally attractive you are, if you throw on an ugly-ass outfit, it will make you look ugly by extension.

[Anonymous No.10067920]

>>10067800
I don't hate it but the wrist cuffs are too much for casual and either the socks should be white or the hair accessories should include more black

[Anonymous No.10067921]

>>10067800
I don’t think it’s a stellar coord but it’s a nitpick at worst. Lazy and casual, yes. However:
1. It’s not too short, or even that short. Just above the knee is an appropriate length in this fashion.
2. Tattoos are whatever. Whether you like them or dislike them is subjective. Having tattoos don’t automatically qualify someone as ita.

[Anonymous No.10067923]

>>10067854
This is straight up plaid abuse.

[Anonymous No.10067927]

[Anonymous No.10067928]

>>10067927
Idk what's trashier - her or the tree decorations

[Anonymous No.10067929]

>>10067927
Tbh, this is what I hate about Christmas coord season. Red and green are so contrasting that it’s hard to make it look right if you’re just shoe-horning the colors together.

[Anonymous No.10067934]

>>10067928
Are...
are those beer cans on the tree?

[Anonymous No.10067936]

>>10067934
Omg and I thought it couldn't get any cheaper

[Anonymous No.10067952]

>>10067891
Close, but not yet.

[Anonymous No.10067955]

>>10067927
Oof
>>10067895
Eh just look in the older archives, newfriend. She isn’t very active here anymore. I think she grew up some. The last “dramu” I heard was between her and garbage-chan, but I really don’t care enough to keep up with everything she does.

[Anonymous No.10067961]

>>10067927
I used to think that she smelt of tuna from her old LJ username.

I'm still not convinced that she doesn't smell like tuna. It's really amazing how these people can stay ita for so many years.

[Anonymous No.10067990]

>>10067879
Would love this with a different skirt. The bright pink just isn't working.

[Anonymous No.10067994]

>>10067990
Not sure I'd constitute this as "bright" pink, but I think a white skirt would work better as well. Not sure it would totally save it, though.

[Anonymous No.10068039]

>>10067856
Is it wrong that I want her dress and nothing else of that coord?

[Anonymous No.10068047]

>>10067856
with different shoes and a vest that actually fits this could be so cute.

>>10067859
...it took a couple of seconds to realize that was a stair rail and not her towering over a tiny christmas tree.

[Anonymous No.10068092]

>>10066662
AHHH nitpick, don't insult my babe like that.

[Anonymous No.10068136]

>>10066751
Yes they have screencaps on lolcow

[Anonymous No.10068137]

>>10067523
Then you must be a fat it’s suck up.

[Anonymous No.10068140]

>>10067635
you sound jealous Risa is naturally thin, Japanese and models often for AP. Sorry no one will ever love you, anon. maybe you’re just too fat?

[Anonymous No.10068152]

>>10067627
It’s just her nose
But I like her, she’s nice

[Anonymous No.10068163]

>>10068137
>>10068140
>what are muscular calves?
Nayrt, but is "lol u r fat" your standard go-to insult, or do you save that one special for us on 4chan(el)?

[Anonymous No.10068180]

>>10067879
Isn't this that peach girl? She seems to be getting worse not better

[Anonymous No.10068183]

>>10068163
Probably
Not as bad as it is on the farm tho
It’s also been proven that skeletons lurk on this board

[Anonymous No.10068188]

>>10067851
>Being conventionally attractive really is not everything
I can't tell if you're saying she is or isn't.

[Anonymous No.10068211]

>>10067856
She's so nasty

[Anonymous No.10068215]

>>10068092
Just because you like someone it doesn't make an outfit less crappy

[Anonymous No.10068241]

>>10066570
Spain is supposed to be a first world country why do we dress like this. This is why I'm a lonelita

[Anonymous No.10068248]

>>10067727
>>10067800
Simple and casual =/= ita

[Anonymous No.10068276]

[Anonymous No.10068277]

>>10068276
Her coords are cute. I just wish she would do something different with her hair/makeup.

[Anonymous No.10068279]

>>10068276
I like her coords, but I think she should consider putting her hair in a cute updo or do something with it anyway, would make a difference imo

[Anonymous No.10068287]

>>10067929
The trick is to go darker and find a green with warmer undertones
>>10067927 looks teal, which is a sin on multiple levels.

>>10067879
Everything about this just looks cheap to me. It also looks weird to have such a summery (aka thin) skirt with that many layers.

[Anonymous No.10068315]

>>10068276
It’s bad because she is ugly, there isn’t much she can do about it

[Anonymous No.10068325]

>>10068315
>>10068276
She's not super uggo. She does need to learn how to do her makeup and hold her head in the photos so as not to emphasize the chin area. As a fellow fattie I know that's not easy-- I usually end up putting a sticker on my face when it's bad.

[Anonymous No.10068332]

>>10068188
I mean she’s obviously not conventionally attractive, you walnut
>>10068140
Sorry that I don’t like your pouty fish faced waifu. It has nothing to do with her race or weight or modeling status. I just don’t think she suits lolita and find her face ugly anon, but you do you.
>>10068241
I’ll pray for you

[Anonymous No.10068334]

>>10068276
Her coords are very basic & bland but I don't hate them. Most fatty-chans look much worse imo.
She tried to look polished but her natural hair is letting her down. It's limp and lifeless at the roots, the wrong style, etc. she should try a nice natural looking dreamholic wig or something. A volumous wig will balance it a bit.

[Anonymous No.10068344]

>>10067360
eghhh the outfit is super ita but this is such a cute concept I can’t hate it. Guy looks good tho.

[Anonymous No.10068348]

>>10068332
That's not obvious to me at all. I find her attractive.

[Anonymous No.10068356]

[Anonymous No.10068357]

[Anonymous No.10068359]

>>10067859
I’m gonna cry this is so horrible

[Anonymous No.10068360]

>>10067879
I love the corset tho :/

[Anonymous No.10068391]

>>10067929
It’s really not that hard to coord red and green, but you still have to wear colors that work well in lolita. The cherry red and bright green combo itas are so fond of works fine color theory wise, but doesn’t look good in lolita.

[Anonymous No.10068397]

[Anonymous No.10068399]

>>10068397

[Anonymous No.10068410]

>>10068399

[Anonymous No.10068415]

>>10068399
Did someone waste perfectly good LTS fabric on this?

[Anonymous No.10068416]

[Anonymous No.10068424]

Potentially retarded newbie question:
Is it ever acceptable to wear socks over tights? I see a lot of (non-japanese) lolita wear ankle socks over tights and it looks retarded, but what do I know?

[Anonymous No.10068434]

>>10066474
I literally choked on my taco
I now have dorito dust in my lungs now.

[Anonymous No.10068494]

>>10067702
anyone who things he should conbine cosplay wigs with lolitas is taggy, and most fandom coords are as well. It's not sailor moon fans, it's just weebs in general.

[Anonymous No.10068497]

>>10068494
excuse my typing, I'm typing on a barely lid screen while spending new years eve at family having to be half social.

[Anonymous No.10068500]

>>10067709
because they don't really care for gothic lolita, but think it's a good way to combine gothic slut attention whore with lolita tag abuser sissy/ddlg attention whore, for maximum attention.

[Anonymous No.10068506]

>>10068424
prob not the right thread for this q but ive worn like sheer nude color tights with ankle socks but like anything else looks weird imo

[Anonymous No.10068507]

>>10067757
I dislike weebs strongly, but having a lot of manga doesn't say you're a bad person. The outfit with it makes me think it's most likely a horrible weeb tho, but there are people who read manga and aren't obnoxious. That's like getting mad at everyone who watches anime. If you can react like it's normal TV, and with manga, a normal comic, there is nothing wrong with it.>>10067757

[Anonymous No.10068513]

>>10068494
>taggy
Faggy + tacky
I love it

[Anonymous No.10068514]

>>10067879
I don't mind the blouse really, the little bit I can see, it reminds me of things like allbertage sometimes makes, where there is a lot of lace and less typical lolita blouse.

That skirt is just a horrible choice tho, I feel it would almost be better with only the underskirt. At least that colour matches the corset. Peignoirs are also just ugly things that need to go away.Wear an overdress that actually keeps the silhouette...

[Anonymous No.10068519]

>>10067893
look at the brands that make these corsets. They are often modelled by titless lolita's. They look fine. It's the coord making it look bad, not the corset itself.

[Anonymous No.10068525]

>>10068424
enough people do it that i guess it's "acceptable" but i agree it literally always looks awful

and while we're at it, so do those mid-calf socks, who the fuck thought that was a good idea

[Anonymous No.10068545]

>>10068424
I think it's fine if the tights are lace or semi sheer, and the socks on top of them are OTKs or knee socks, and only if there's not a lot of the tights showing. It's a way to add texture to coords and keep your socks up easily, but if there's too much tights showing (i.e. if your dress is short or if you're wearing ankle socks) then it looks bad more often than not.

[Anonymous No.10068602]

>>10068332
Thanks anon. I hope you find a good comm(if you want) too

[Anonymous No.10068613]

[Anonymous No.10068615]

>>10068613
is it bad that I unironically love the skirt part of right girl?

[Anonymous No.10068617]

>>10067491
eat my menstruating pussy, subhuman pile of sexual degenerate filth.

[Anonymous No.10068618]

>>10068615
I like the duck jsk entirely

[Anonymous No.10068619]

[Anonymous No.10068620]

>>10068618
With actual proper coording skills these could turn out so good and original, all the more pity that they went costume with them. What even are those bows on their heads

[Anonymous No.10068628]

>>10068248
I feel like the first one is nitpick - normie socks and an awkward facial expression are my only complaints. Not sure about the second one, though. Something seems unbalanced about it.

[Anonymous No.10068632]

>>10068416
Nitpick until we see the legwear.

[Anonymous No.10068634]

>>10068506
I agree for the most part. I wear nude pantyhose with otks if it's really cold out.

[Anonymous No.10068638]

>>10068619
I know that you're supposed to look like a young girl in lolita but...this legitimately looks like something modern five-year-old would wear for Easter.

[Anonymous No.10068660]

>>10068241
Omfg what comm is this? Im not on facebook i need to know

[Anonymous No.10068682]

[Anonymous No.10068683]

>>10068682

[Anonymous No.10068684]

>>10068683
Tags

[Anonymous No.10068693]

>>10068519
It’s the fit of the corset as well anon, most of the pictures from Abilletage actually feature women with tits(surprise!) but I found one with a flatter model.

Notice how she doesn’t look like there are two tiny lumps above her corset unlike Plum Chan?

[Anonymous No.10068731]

>>10068424
I usually wear otks with same color leggings or thick knit tights for warmth in the winter, but it gets hella cold where I am so mlep. Wouldn't wear socks over tights for any other reason though, because that's silly.

[Anonymous No.10068732]

>>10068613
They look like the hosts of a kids show.

[Anonymous No.10068741]

>>10068416
Nitpick. Vandetta?

[Anonymous No.10068915]

>>10067879
i feel she was going for more of a cult party look here. in desperate need of more accessories and layers but i disagree with what some other anons have said, i think she got the colours right.
basically nitpick.

[Anonymous No.10068916]

>>10067859
me looking down on normies while walking around in mana-height oldschool platforms

[Anonymous No.10068954]

>>10068683
does anyone actually enjoy seeing these sorts of images in the ita thread? the ones where it's only tagged lolita because of some shitty related hashtag generator and not because the OP *actually* thinks she's *~so rorita fashun desu~*?

[Anonymous No.10068965]

>>10066832
>vendetta post
Diff anon but this is ita as fuck. When does he get deported?

[Anonymous No.10069016]

>>10068965
kys sara

[Anonymous No.10069139]

>>10068954
Yeah, because they make me feel better for myself that I never dressed up like that, called it an entirely different fashion, and had the gall to post it online.

[Anonymous No.10069241]

This is creepy

[Anonymous No.10069246]

>>10069016
Go choke on a dick, David

[Anonymous No.10069256]

>>10068693
This one isn't Abilletage tho, and they aren't the only ones making these corsets. Other brands do feature flat models as well. Excentrique, Dangerous Nude, Tripple Fortune, Cutie Frash, Sheglit, Luna Coniglia, Magical Holic, they all made such short corsets as well, and I undoubtly still forget some. This one is Luna Coniglia >https://atelier-pierrot.shop-pro.jp/?pid=137987846

>Notice how she doesn’t look like there are two tiny lumps above her corset unlike Plum Chan?
Now I'm not sure if you're agreeing to me or disagreeing, considering you show a flat model looking better than Plum-chan as reaction to me saying it's not the fact she's flat that makes it look bad, but the way she's wearing it (either badly fitting her, or a bad blouse, or a bad bra, or something else).

[Anonymous No.10069277]

>>10069241
She has a very fashion model look which can sometimes clash with sweeter styles. I think she'd make a great gothic lolita. MMM would look gorgeous I am willing to bet.

[Anonymous No.10069372]

>>10069241
yea i think it might just be the weird slouch pose and dead eyes in the second photo. dont think its terrible

[Anonymous No.10069380]

>>10069241
I’m fairly sure the creepy vibe was on purpose, it’s hard to imagine anyone thinking this isn’t unsettling.

[Anonymous No.10069381]

>>10069246
I don’t have as much burando as David, sorry Sara. Grow up, stop scamming people, and stop lurking on cgl

[Anonymous No.10069383]

[Anonymous No.10069446]

>>10067671
The top is listed at 98 cm. I had it a while ago and it' honestly huge.

[Anonymous No.10069478]

>>10069383
start a new thread if you're gonna post images, this one is autosage

[Anonymous No.10069523]

>>10069241
Not just creepy. The outfit is bad. Too short a dress, bad shoes, socks, just everything.

[Anonymous No.10069893]

>>10068915
Cult party kei is dead.
That aside, the colors don’t even go together well enough. The undertones of cool and warm make it look so messy.
Peignoir =\= cult party kei

Her look is just a hot mess and ita af

[Anonymous No.10070082]

>>10069893
just because the style's dead it doesn't mean people can't wear it. i still would've said cult party without the peignoir. i dont see clashing warm and cool tones, that's a nitpick.

[Anonymous No.10070106]

>>10070082
If you can't really see it then you must be pretty deep up that plum ass.