[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 288 KB, 500x600, 558ec991-a305-560f-910f-b236ea0f592d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10168758 No.10168758 [Reply] [Original] [rbt]

Like the title says. Doesn't have to be eye-searingly ugly/wtf, just ones you don't like and why
I'll start. I never liked this print which makes this item double ugly for me

>> No.10168760

why is it covered in the star of david?

>> No.10168767

It’s a Kagome crest, which uses the same shape but is from Shinto.

>> No.10169031

That's one of my dream dresses, I want it in the red colorway though

>> No.10169036
File: 267 KB, 500x600, burnit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I fucking hate horror garden. The print itself is beautiful, but the materials used are vile. I hate every dress ap puts out with that cheap material and the gross overlay that distracts from the print.

>> No.10169092

I like the skirt version. but I agree, a lot of newer angelic pretty releases look pretty cheap and costumey

>> No.10169103

>horror garden


>> No.10169106

did you join lolita yesterday? Anything after 2012 is new

>> No.10169108
File: 40 KB, 250x333, 33032e05-93cc-5af4-ad80-4927e312372f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Honey Cake in this particular cut and colorway. The shiny brown/gold parts on the bodice look horrible with the white trim in my opinion and it's just all around ugly af. I'd take the mint/white combo over this any day.

>> No.10169111
File: 254 KB, 500x600, 2b07d956-f907-5520-908d-ba05d41b3a6b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Pretty much everything with this print, partially because I hate it and partially because it's a snowflake magnet. Looks like tumblr threw up on it

>> No.10169116

That’s not how it works.

God I fucking hate honeycake. The definition of a bandwagon dress.

>> No.10169125

A piece being considered old or new is fairly subjective, it really all depends on when you started in the fashion. Someone who's been wearing lolita since the early 2000's will likely consider something like the second milky planet release new, but for someone just entering the fashion, that may be considered an "old" print since their jumping off point is much later.

>> No.10169127

I’ve been in the fashion for a decade and consider a piece that’s been released in the last 1-2 years new. The idea that a 7 year old piece is “new” is bordering on retarded.

>> No.10169131 [DELETED] 

I’ve bad someone argue to me a piece from 2008 was new. Some people are just stupid when it comes to labeling pieces. If a piece is old enough to be in middle school if it were a person it’s not new. If a piece is old enough to be in elementary school it’s not new.

>> No.10169134
File: 96 KB, 360x420, 50a402bd-a1af-5fce-ba6c-6b332bce45ba.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Meta i love you but this colorway reminds me of a slot machine

>> No.10169135
File: 138 KB, 480x640, fbc7a98d-33cd-555b-b806-87c1e8a4faf8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

unloading my mental shitlist

>> No.10169138
File: 48 KB, 468x600, 37093105df2473799393c2ab18ad3196.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10169141 [DELETED] 

Somebody post the coord.

>> No.10169142
File: 151 KB, 480x640, 057169cd-d279-56ca-bc51-4666ab791f6a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10169143

I was just generalising and saying that newer angelic pretty releases can look a lil costumey, not even necessarily horror garden.. can't believe I gotta repeat myself cos salty bitches wanna misconstrue shit to suit their argument

>> No.10169144
File: 212 KB, 345x600, g166285198.1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

how could i forget

>> No.10169145 [DELETED] 

But you replied to a post about horror garden saying you agreed that “newer” pieces being costumey. Maybe learn to construct a sentence so you get your point across properly.

>> No.10169147
File: 85 KB, 427x640, c0aa22a6-8c8c-4b31-9150-99eb5f2c76a7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

less squabbling more ugly dresses

>> No.10169148 [DELETED] 

I don’t normally like overlays but I think it works for horror garden. It reminds me of fog over a graveyard.

>> No.10169150

my post was simple enough, i was saying i ~like~ horror garden's skirt version, you just chose to conflate the two so you could get angry about something. stay mad

>> No.10169151 [DELETED] 

>stay mad
>unironically using the u mad bro meme

Spot the newfag

>> No.10169160
File: 143 KB, 480x640, c35d9dd9-db15-52e1-b1a4-26b7df5aa26d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

posting more for the cut but this colorway sucks too

>> No.10169161
File: 134 KB, 480x640, ea23534a-41ac-5ea4-b710-714128026a78.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

the infamous shrek dress

>> No.10169162
File: 24 KB, 300x400, 08401dae-0015-5c35-871b-1b6ff0afbb6a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

pizza dress

>> No.10169166
File: 1.04 MB, 527x772, mtp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10169217

I love this

>> No.10169221
File: 131 KB, 574x822, 7e323dc5a3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10169223
File: 139 KB, 600x899, forest-sambar-vincent-and-moon-night-lolita-jsk-fs-4_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10169226
File: 452 KB, 428x600, 58f1e8cea0440c12.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10169228
File: 103 KB, 600x826, wa-lolita-dress-with-landscape-prints-sb-50_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10169230

Taobao is a bit of a low hanging fruit, they make lots of wacky shit

>> No.10169231
File: 195 KB, 1500x1500, 0007873198920_A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

someone help me, whats the one thats made out of a swirly print that looks like a disposable coffee cup

>> No.10169239

>this colorway reminds me of a slot machine
That's something I like about it.

>> No.10169354

Can you at least tell us which brand it was?

>> No.10169355

I love this dress but has anyone ever worn it well?

>> No.10169357

No, I swear every coord with it has some stupid tumblr snowflake makeup and a terrible pastel wig

>> No.10169358

Such a cool print but the cut is garbage

Oh Jesus not the UKIP dress

A girl in my comm managed to wear this nicely

>> No.10169360
File: 122 KB, 960x720, D52ZaocUcAA5aoa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I absolutely love the cut but I wish the print weren't plates and shit. I have bought this for sure if it were flowers or cats or pretty much anything else

>> No.10169363
File: 416 KB, 480x640, P15JS202-g.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

This colour is an abomination

>> No.10169368

So many gulls hate my wardrobe...

>> No.10169384

wtf is that collar as well? looks like something they'd put on a monster high doll.
oh god, this dress always gives me alt-left 2015 flashbacks.
i mean... at least it's a creative concept? sure?? yeah, nah.
i'd like this if there was no purple. i want a mint chocolate dress.
what on god's earth is this abomination
halloween vomit #99999999.
it's still awful.
ronald mcdonald crossplay?
it's inoffensive. reminds me of modern my little pony art.
looks like tumblr otherkin artwork. no.
what is this print even meant to be of? it looks like a china plate to me.
at least if you spill your coke on it, it'll just add more detail.
why is there a random ctrl+v pot of vinegar. why.
it could be coorded nicely, i don't mind the colour too much.

>> No.10169390

Holy shit nobody cares.

>> No.10169391


>> No.10169398

Hard agree

>> No.10169400

Once I saw a girl wearing this at my workplace with her bf. That or a very similar print. Personally I think she looked pretty nice in it, though her hair was messy. She was super shy too and I really wanted to say something encouraging about her wearing lolita in public, though I can't remember if I actually did.

>> No.10169425

the saddest thing about this dress is that it looks even worse in person. usually i give shit like this the benefit of the doubt and figure they must look nicer irl but this one looks even more cheap and tacky

>> No.10169427

The plates are fine but whatever that brown stuff is (vinegar?) ruins it

>> No.10169429

i love that print (and also the cut) but i don't see myself wearing anything that nice desu, i mostly just wear casual

>> No.10169430

I dislike any print with angels or cherubs. They completely ruin any cute print for me. Often I will find a cute floral print I want to buy but there are stupid naked babies flying around in it when you look closely. Why do people like them?

>> No.10169432

>what is this print even meant to be of?
i think it was supposed to be an aquarium

>> No.10169433
File: 129 KB, 645x645, tumblr_p277w9QKKf1u7j0aso2_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

This. Especially pic related I don't get the hype

>> No.10169434

I'm pretty sure they're different tea pots

>> No.10169435
File: 51 KB, 480x640, 12316151_1668326810090268_8063187576718194616_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I feel the same way about Mary and Jesus. It just makes me cringe. Cecelia Cross is such a beautiful dress and I don't mint the crosses at all but Mary just kills it for me

>> No.10169440

Are you kidding? Those aren't cherubs, they're like seraphs or something. The kind of angels that are weird eldritch wingbeasts. There aren't any naked babies on that print, not even a baby Jesus.

>> No.10169447

i actually like this one ngl

>> No.10169474

it's very popular so

>> No.10169477

shut the fuck up dude

>> No.10169482
File: 455 KB, 851x315, 59916566_1712577252177907_2737350878724882432_n.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

lol my entire wardrobe

adding on, i was in LOVE with the print for the release but they screwed the pooch on all three cuts

>> No.10169563
File: 115 KB, 1080x1080, 59578163_113559203195255_5749184905595760137_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

but....how can you hate such cuteness?

>> No.10169608

what print is that?

>> No.10169609
File: 131 KB, 480x640, b5959d66-50e9-5e5a-8d2f-a391366f6820.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I hate the green lettering.

>> No.10169615

innocent world's angel land

>> No.10169641

Anon what are you talking about, it was only released like last yea-
Wait what the fuck

I feel this way about so many of Baby and AatP’s releases over the last few years. So many nice prints ruined by ugly cuts, and even if both cut and print are cute they’ll ruin it with that poly chiffon that makes all darker colours look washed out and the print look muddled. Plus it’s the kind of fabric that’s easily permanently damaged by alterations and even pins/brooches so where I might normally have removed a superfluous ribbon or two to make the piece more wearable for me, I’m now afraid to touch them in any way.

>> No.10169654

Do you mean their shantung stuff?

>> No.10169660
File: 398 KB, 390x645, 650022-7444-2016-05-15171567.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

aatp wizarding platform
there are some other prints they've done like this too, where it just looks so muddy and gross, i'm shocked people bought this

>> No.10169680

AATP tea time something and so on? Has a scruffy doily trim?

>> No.10169690

What the fuck lmao this is so ugly

>> No.10169691

People bought it because harry potter.

>> No.10169702

The ones I'm talking about are listed as chiffon, powdery chiffon, vintage satin or simply polyester.

>> No.10169704
File: 161 KB, 1080x1349, Download success.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I think it went on sale

>> No.10169705

Ayy lmao

>> No.10169714

How to ruin a cute cut with shit material and a tacky print.

>> No.10169730

Let me correct myself. In the grand scheme of lolita history, anything that was released after 2012 is relatively new, 2008-2011 is a bit older and is the renaissance era of lolita, and old school is >2007

>> No.10169731

The material is actually really nice though

>> No.10169734

>say something stupid
>people point out it’s stupid
>backtrack to try and make it less stupid.

Sure Jan. You totally meant “relatively new.” Which is still retarded, btw

>> No.10169736

if it’s older than 5 years old it’s really reaching to try and call it relatively new, especially given the life of the fashion. if we were talking about goth then that would be more reasonable, but we arent

>> No.10169740

The image is not doing it any favours then.

>> No.10169757
File: 82 KB, 600x690, e1ec1d0d-b5c8-55b7-83a7-93e1772eef01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

UGH I FKING FOUND IT ofc its bodyline but seriously the WORST fabric ever. this is some joann's bad handmade tier.

>> No.10169759

Shit that is well bad.

>> No.10169763
File: 74 KB, 426x639, i-img426x639-15576252422ienrx10196.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

continuing my shitlist, this McMeta piece

>> No.10169771
File: 136 KB, 480x640, a6817d59-cc11-4cc3-8454-cd9023d4b564.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

can you all stfu and post shit you don't like like the fucking thread says

>> No.10169774

Stop trying to police what other people post holy shit

>> No.10169778

This looks like those meme fast food cosplays

>> No.10169836

Yeeeesh. If I got my hands on this I’d probably end up taking it apart to reuse the lace.

>> No.10169924

I think I thought this was a CLAMP collaboration for the longest time. But when I searched the other day it looks like their only collab was the btssb cardcaptor dress. I thought there was a collab with another brand, I’m so confused

>> No.10169930

you take that back you fucking monster

>> No.10169935

iirc isnt it creamy mami?

also, with you on this. love this color. but yeah it only works for certain complexions.

>> No.10169940
File: 78 KB, 232x313, Vampire_20Req_20stock.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I've never seen Vampire Requiem look good on anyone, in any colourway. This cut, as well as the skirt, both tend to look awful and unflattering. They also seem to be ita magnets for some reason.

>> No.10170012

At least it’s not Holy Lantern.

>> No.10170015
File: 98 KB, 500x600, 08CA3ACA-8BC1-4F8C-9947-C0AEAA887FC6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I wanted to love this but after seeing it in person I realized how cheap it actually looks.

>> No.10170018

>sure Jan
Chriiiist. I don't even agree with the other anon who started this shit cause I got horror garden when it came out but God you sound fucking useless when you spout memes like this.

>> No.10170039

If it didn't have that stripe look and it was made of cotton or something, I think this would've been something people sought after.

>> No.10170043

nayrt but i have no respect for people who unironically still use that meme. it's probably the most normie sounding bullshit, and they're usually the people screaming things are "normie"

>> No.10170046

Sure jan

>> No.10170062

Wait damn

It was really 2015? Fuck...

>> No.10170065

I have seen this in person and I thought it looked okay and I am not a huge fan of the ALL THE RUFFLES ON ONE DRESS look.

>> No.10170069

You proved my point, anon.

>> No.10170279


Oo Jia made a replica of this print. Probably responsible for about 90% of the itas right there.

I saw some decent coords way back when the dress was first released. They've been drowned out by the itas wearing replicas, though.

>> No.10170398
File: 194 KB, 480x640, kirakira.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Not the ugliest print but there's a bit too much happening for my liking.

>> No.10170547
File: 200 KB, 480x640, 5731abc9-cb24-460e-8d33-f2fa3b482121.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I know meta is pretty common fare for these sorts of threads but baby has released some seriously ugly stuff

>> No.10170549
File: 140 KB, 480x640, 8f6fcb28-840c-4dfc-857c-03a090fb1f82.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

This one looks like children's dress up clothing even close up

>> No.10170551
File: 114 KB, 480x640, f49b1b78-c76a-5636-bfc0-e815fd6be42c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10170565

I love this print in other cuts. This one always looks so off though.

>> No.10170580

I love that print and the cut, it's so flattering on me

>> No.10170581

Personally I'm not a fan of cheerful lemon, especially in the blue (I find the pink more tolerable but I still don't really like it), but the plastic lemon jewelry and hairpin that go with it are fucking cute. The fact that the jsk 1 has a little more going on on top than just the sad little bow that the salopette has helps it look less "off" imo. I do agree that I don't like the cut of that salopette, the shorter skirt length and dropped waist don't look quite right with that print

>> No.10170686
File: 107 KB, 480x640, 7b612a27-10ef-52f7-88af-a8c7142de5f8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

heheh how could you not post the WORSE colorway lmao

>> No.10170693

i wish baby would stop with the bow overload

>> No.10170694

Missed your opportunity to say BOWverload

>> No.10170725

This is absolutely no help, but it is a collaboration, just not with CLAMP or Creamy Mami. I can't for the life of me remember with who but I think it was either a musician or an artist.

>> No.10170731

Are you new? Being a retard and getting off topic isn’t how this place is supposed to work. Stop reeing about other people “policing” you every time someone tells you to stfu

>> No.10170745

This looks cute to me, although I never think that cut feels very "lolita".

>> No.10170764
File: 273 KB, 500x600, 9b7c7bd5-c456-4f45-9d93-4527c9781863.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>hurr stop telling me to not derail the thread and act like a tard!
anyways AP put this out in 2017 for about $400 yet every colorway looks like milanoo-tier garbage, especially the red and the white

>> No.10170766
File: 295 KB, 500x600, e7ca8af5-a2db-4c1f-a4c8-077fbdadcbe1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

ivory colorway. thought it was white, my bad

>> No.10170768

Maybe because it's not actually a jsk and is actually a salopette?

>> No.10170777

Adding an image to your post doesn’t really change the fact you’re being a hypocrite with off topic shitposting too.

>> No.10170782
File: 471 KB, 600x800, 572a539c-29c6-58c4-9cd8-4c96abcc67a0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Jetj is very hit or miss

>> No.10170783
File: 356 KB, 600x800, de2d8e08-6a69-53b9-bb78-7159ab0dec94.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10170785
File: 308 KB, 500x667, 7a77bf5c-868a-589c-bed2-49280a63ac29.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10170786
File: 455 KB, 600x800, bd8744ee-f38e-5c98-99db-cfdacd81f371.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10170788
File: 508 KB, 600x800, ec772ce7-cdef-5c8c-b415-a2f4b1c5d8da.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10170789
File: 471 KB, 600x800, f9a858c1-5ad9-5f20-8e63-964934983b5a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10170791
File: 299 KB, 600x800, b2c29b35-13ea-54de-a1be-70922034417e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10170796
File: 312 KB, 600x800, a9ac748d-4d22-5142-b6a8-07b01d298129.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10170799
File: 85 KB, 334x429, f80fd987-74b4-57d0-8492-c9c0c1fbb380.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10170803
File: 97 KB, 300x400, 8f3e6d9e-e88e-542f-bfeb-d6f9c25a37f5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

end of jetj spam

>> No.10170805

I'm adding this to my wishlist

What's wrong with this?

>> No.10170807

I don't like the cut at all. The print is mostly fine, but I think they should have toned down the red guy a little because he jumps out too much

>> No.10170808
File: 113 KB, 800x800, 6b0792ca-881a-52b3-8c15-c877f1ce7a35.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I feel like collabs are kinda low hanging fruit but there's a lot of fugly ones out there

>> No.10170810
File: 172 KB, 800x800, 14c9386a-da8d-5938-900e-13a3556c875a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170812
File: 148 KB, 800x800, 0fd3dbc7-65e8-5f94-8778-027f633cf0db.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170814
File: 109 KB, 480x640, 3202d299-053f-5b1c-91c5-12a526ee9cfb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170817
File: 359 KB, 800x800, c5ba0535-92b2-5d92-ad85-03a325217232.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170850
File: 98 KB, 420x420, 8261a9e7-de38-5b23-ac61-c893799dbd92.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170852
File: 98 KB, 480x640, af560ece-70c2-5b74-8d91-797105425c57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10170855
File: 91 KB, 480x640, 0dacab53-af5e-56a4-81c4-d3022a244999.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10170867

I usually hate collabs, especially Disney ones but these are ok to me.

>> No.10171112

But its got a friend on it!!!!

>> No.10171114

Please tell me that this isn't reference to Portlandia.

>> No.10171136


I love the spooky Victorian scrapbook feel of jetj prints. My issue is the cuts are often unflattering or just kind of silly, like the random chiffon flaps on >>10170796. But these 2 are nice cuts and prints.

>> No.10171156
File: 90 KB, 900x900, c2924ace3e013274325361de45f7c0d5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


I thought for sure they were gonna continue with the trend of picking the really bad ones that were sold through the Disney store rather than veer off into some of the halfway decent collabs.

Word has it this particular Alice series is so bad the fabric is see-through on several items, here the tights with the seams that they didn't even bother to design for non-matching seams

>> No.10171166

I've seen it look cute on other girls, but the materials close up are really costume tier.

>> No.10171171

>posts the back of a dress

>> No.10171175

I think this would work better if the print was smaller

>> No.10171226

Me likey. Can someone id this pls

>> No.10171258

and this is actually the nice cut. It's even worse in the OP version

>> No.10171265

My eyes

>> No.10171273
File: 171 KB, 800x800, 4eb5d8dc-fbf8-5a0f-aeb7-a9713d5153b2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

The front isn't much better,

>> No.10171276

La bibliothèque OP and La Lettre d'un Poète OP, respectively, both JetJ
I would like this photo so much more if they didn't use those heels... I really don't think think thin heels belong in lolita

>> No.10171280
File: 87 KB, 250x333, 18b6a398-b26e-50d6-a6d3-e344294a310c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

This thing has always looked gross to me and I'm not quite sure why. I'm normally fond of baked sweets prints too.

>> No.10171291


Wow Baby does collabs so much better than AP. With AP they just look either cheap or like kids dresses. Baby goes all out on the design and materials.

>> No.10171296

>Baby goes all out on the design and materials
You should see >>10170850 in person, it's so ugly.

>> No.10171581

One bad one out of 8 is not so bad. I'm a huge AP fag but even I can see Baby is superior in this regard.

>> No.10171651
File: 67 KB, 280x373, bf7d79e6-070b-5bb9-ba76-9f6cab093c1e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Speaking of terrible collabs, this abomination.
Also every print by AtePie, I don't know how anyone would think they look good.

>> No.10171793
File: 119 KB, 595x842, d2d26288250b0b93eb2336f0415e54ed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


The rule is, if you buy it from the Disney store -- disneystore.jp, then it's gonna be cheap (literally cheap, like $100 dresses, not $250), and nasty fast fashion. You just can't halve the price tag of a lolita dress, put both Disney and burando tags on it, print it in full colour, and still expect something other than cheap, fast fashion disposable plastic dresses.

If you buy it from the burando store (eg- angelicpretty-onlineshop or babyssb), then the dress will be more expensive due to paying for Disney licensing, but the quality will be on par with their usual releases and it won't suck quite as hard.

Anon for some reason posted all of AP's dresses from disneystore.jp (ie the cheap stuff) and then all the btssb/aatp dresses from babyssb (ie the expensive stuff).

>> No.10172127

>Anon for some reason posted all of AP's dresses from disneystore.jp (ie the cheap stuff) and then all the btssb/aatp dresses from babyssb (ie the expensive stuff).
To encourage more bias against AP probably.

>> No.10172353

i just went thru the collaboration tag on lolibrary since collabs regardless of brand are ugly most of the time you brainlet
the baby collabs are equally as bad imo

>> No.10172355

Go back to whatever board you came from. Jesus that was obvious.

>> No.10172387

Transatlanticism OP

>> No.10172395

you can pry all the AP & Baby X Disney collabs out of my cold dead hands

>> No.10172417
File: 131 KB, 480x640, 1f6c11ff-2032-5f57-9d07-6f3da8eaef87.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I really hate some of baby's 2008-2010 prints despite loving AP's prints from their era and liking baby's newer stuff.They're not even "bad" i just don't like them and i have no clue why. I especially hate this print in the blue colorway

>> No.10172446

adult women who are obsessed with disney have the same potent, autistic energy as neckbeard manchild

>> No.10172450

Literally looks like something you can get from aliexpress for 17$

>> No.10172451

it's mainly just the Alice in wonderland prints / not so much the aristocats one lol

>> No.10172460

To be fair, I think all actual angels described in the Bible are more eldritch. Naked babies was a Roman thing

>> No.10172464

This dress reminds me of Christine Daae’s Point of No Return dress in the musical, I find it pretty. But holy crap is the red terrible.

>> No.10172474

As do almost all AP galaxy/space/sky prints.

>> No.10172492

Naked babies are an Italian thing called putti iirc.

>> No.10172783

Ayrt, I agree. Space theme was a mistake

>> No.10172818

Why do gulls hate galaxy stuff so much?

>> No.10173286

Popular collaboration for the time, they are seraphim, it’s stained glass, there are lots of colors in it for visual interest but it’s not too busy because the theme is tight and the detail is good. It’s still a very focused and coherent theme. I still love mine but I have a different cut and colourway.

>> No.10173292

The rich sissies are drooling over this

>> No.10173295

I’ve been wearing the fashion 10 years. ‘New’ to me means ‘released within the past season’ same as any fashion timing. So right now, nothing older than spring 2019 is ‘new’. Of course I love some older things too, my oldest dress is 15 now, hard to believe, but I don’t pretend that thinking of years-old stuff as ‘oh all those ~new~ things’ gives me any clout as some kind of oldbie. Diligent noobs can collect all kinds of old stuff, real old-timers who are still in the fashion may eagerly follow every new release of one or more brands. We are all different and in our own lane.

>> No.10173302

I still really like this one and also their blue carousel dress. But yes, I think some jetj with odd clip-art is wak.

>> No.10173448
File: 79 KB, 335x400, a5c4eb75-b11f-5d91-bd03-f17f1b78e09b.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

There is some JetJ stuff I genuinely like (stuff like legwear and phone cases mostly), although honestly I think I'm biased against JetJ because I prefer solid pieces and JetJ's signature of course is their collage prints. That being said, here's a non-print piece they put out in 2016 that I think was a real miss

>> No.10173463

Idk what that is

>> No.10175034

You could make a delicious bacon cheeseburger coord with this.

>> No.10175100

I'm sorry to be that person but holy shit, I love this. Does anyone know the name? I've been searching cut can't find it.

>> No.10175110 [DELETED] 
File: 86 KB, 602x868, file.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


I got another one too

>> No.10175112 [DELETED] 
File: 399 KB, 800x800, 264881299f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


I swear this place has some of the most disgusting designs possible, is it meant to prey on sissies who have discovered Chinese cosplay/lolita-ish stores or something??

Do they even have sissies in China?

These are some of the most hideous things i've ever laid eyes on, but it gets worse

>> No.10175121
File: 313 KB, 500x600, 8cc30c5d-e8cd-4fab-9e16-752155b472f2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


Naked babies was a Hellenistic thing that the Romans appropriated. Started with Eros/Cupid, moved on to cherubs and baby Jesus.

On topic though, I never much cared for Fancy Hospital.

>> No.10175410

I own all of these...

>> No.10175418


>> No.10175419

One gull's trash is another gull's treasure

>> No.10175487
File: 48 KB, 426x640, 19-05-22-h-135.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

penis socks showed up on closetchild and I just wanna post them because I love them

cock themed coordinate when?

>> No.10175489

Nah i look cute as hell

>> No.10175496

JetJ Lapin et Carrousel JSK

>> No.10175498
File: 242 KB, 670x400, 8b388d71-f876-5058-85cf-47d46f2b1b05.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

This jetj OP which is nice in the front and a hot mess in the back

>> No.10175580

I feel like things like these could work if they didnt just shoehorn the characters in there. A print based on the lanterns in Tangled would be DD quality imho

>> No.10175713
File: 231 KB, 250x229, that deserved a star.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

tfw I had these for the longest time, and totally thought of doing that. I never got around to it, and now the world may never know

person i sold them to: cock coord when?

>> No.10175728
File: 165 KB, 439x542, Screen Shot 2018-03-20 at 5.31.31 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>kimono pattern
>no other traditional japanese elements in the entire dress
what were they thinking?

>> No.10175730

aw, my chinese side has a soft spot for this dress. My mom would love this.

>> No.10175731

I wore them once in a coord where a bachelorette party ended up showing up to our bar with 6 ft inflatable dick they were carrying around, I don't have the photos anymore though
huge regert

>> No.10175732

God, I agree so much. I LOVE cross prints, as overdone as they are but the instant there's some fat flying baby or actual religious figure it completely ruins it.

>> No.10175740
File: 36 KB, 300x400, c5e1c642-2c8d-581e-bb4a-7a6a247716a3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I love MM with my whole heart but


>> No.10175744

>tfw no lolita gf to do Beauty and Beast Disneybound coords with

>> No.10175747

uh, probably meiji-era fashion? i love this dress and prefer wa prints in western cuts.

>> No.10175767

ohhhh duh. I still think the dress looks off though, I wish they hadn't used that tan-green for the other color in the pattern

>> No.10175771


I have the lavender version which looks elegant as heck, but I can see how you can't really unsee mr beast kei. Still, I would cop/10

>> No.10175801

what's this dress called?

>> No.10175814

It's the manga/anime Candy Candy.

>> No.10175911
File: 58 KB, 300x400, b1966832-1939-583e-8cb3-d3784f98b2c8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Paulina. That and Annette Rose (pic related) are the only two MM items that make me scratch my head

>> No.10175917

Damn I love Annette Rose, would buy in a heartbeat

>> No.10175928
File: 86 KB, 360x420, TheWorst.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

How could you not include the Worst Colorway

>> No.10175932

Between Baby, AP, and AATP all the new dresses these days are cut for pancake tits. There's no way I'm gonna be able to fit my melons into any of these regardless of measurements.

>> No.10175937

anon, I get what you mean but I don't think you know what pancake tits are...

>> No.10176006
File: 136 KB, 480x640, baab7517-1b3f-578b-92c5-7e3f03816125.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

literally any cut and colorway of this thing.

>> No.10176076
File: 101 KB, 250x333, f8869e11-420d-540f-a8cf-f06484ece89c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

This print is still popular and I've never seen a coord with any cut or color that I've liked

>> No.10176101

Anything that is random images with random colored letters and the combo red + blue is just gross to me

>> No.10176173 [DELETED] 

Because it’s lazy, tacky, ugly and only appealing- to fat, greasy tumberlina types.

>> No.10176182
File: 42 KB, 231x294, 2A5D6C10-B581-4E2D-8850-DD9092D515CA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

western art started depicting the cherubs/cherubim the same as putti; the chubby angel babies. If anything cherubs are actually supposed to be a bit creepy looking.

>> No.10176225

I actually got into lolita after stumbling onto cgl. I think its interesting that all the stuff I like are the things that gulls hate.

>> No.10176251

This looks like someone sat in toilet paper in a bathroom, the hell was the thinking here?

>> No.10176271

Does the weird lace-up look better in person? Honestly everything MM has put out is golden, I'm just being nitpicky

>> No.10176354

all of AP's "row" type prints are really ugly imo

>> No.10176452

Is it any combo of blue and red or is it only bright blue and red? Like would more a more muted blue and red be acceptable? I agree that I'm not a fan of bright blue and bright red together

>> No.10176460

It’s popular because it’s literally a meme dress. I have not met anyone who has genuinely liked it outside of the meme.

>> No.10176628
File: 83 KB, 700x700, hideous.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10176639

out of morbid curiosity, you got a close up?

>> No.10176645
File: 110 KB, 700x700, 50k, used.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I think the rose fabric is lovely, but everything about the detailing and cut is repulsive.

>> No.10176646

what a waste of that nice rose fabric... it really would have looked really nice as a simple dress with minimal lace

>> No.10177562
File: 16 KB, 300x400, d181dbea-0409-5410-a44a-dbf6fd177f6a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10177564

Hard disagree, I would die happy if I could find this dress

>> No.10177566

All i can see is a shining vagina gateway

>> No.10177579

You and me both anon

>> No.10177587

This is adorable, I'm also gonna have to hard disagree but I respect your opinion anon.

>> No.10177588

>tfw it sold for 79k a few days ago

>> No.10177793

>Tfw new Meta is tacky half-shirred princess dresses
>Tfw even if they rereleased this it probably wouldn't be as nice as their old releases
>Tfw older pieces going for retarded prices lately

Being an old metafag is suffering

>> No.10177821


>> No.10178230

wait a year and the fad will pass. Old school is really popular in japan and the west right now.

>> No.10178245

Nah you're just retarded

>> No.10178548

>wait a year and the fad will pass
Anon it has been gradually building up since the end of 2012 and went full trend around 2015. There is no end to the fad in sight because there is no new popular thing to replace it other than old moitie rn, which goes hand in hand with oldschool. Unless we manage to meme 2010 era OTT sweet into place, it can only get worse.

Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.