[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

/vt/ is now archived.Become a Patron!

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 162 KB, 615x893, ENrpPGgWt6w.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
10292279 No.10292279 [Reply] [Original] [rbt]

No minors pls

>> No.10292280
File: 169 KB, 942x1080, bytx2GH8000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10292281
File: 150 KB, 1080x1350, FRCxAEJJtm8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10292282
File: 1.34 MB, 1616x2160, WlFfvf1j_mI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10292283
File: 662 KB, 1440x2160, E4EabipaGbY.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


"This vintage dress is great for lolita"

>> No.10292316
File: 500 KB, 768x768, 67605412_457725961522303_8934730898016204158_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I worked hard on that thread.

>> No.10292317
File: 115 KB, 1080x1349, 70841653_427305824880303_6103122829947779768_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10292318
File: 114 KB, 1080x1080, 71730741_577314279743155_4992116999597502364_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10292320
File: 109 KB, 1080x1080, 71758087_723826178027308_1219277574575717573_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10292321
File: 115 KB, 1080x1080, 73385880_2428968954088031_183519292313643733_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10292322
File: 103 KB, 1080x1322, 73427513_442350516664828_6792370215030881686_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10292323
File: 99 KB, 1080x1107, 73524885_166539704555870_4755684371418718739_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10292324
File: 229 KB, 1080x1350, 74808932_447880612529313_902600730938396297_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10292325
File: 105 KB, 960x960, 74898970_148216503163487_3842679451485712040_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10292326
File: 96 KB, 1000x1000, 74956764_536845737146235_8507029595086453995_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10292328
File: 111 KB, 1050x1150, 75208787_1985441948225179_3269320576050715895_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10292329
File: 122 KB, 1080x1080, 1571325808716.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

and a highlight from my personal Hall of Shame to finish the dump

>> No.10292406

I thought her heel was broken til I looked at the other and realized it's supposed to be like that.

>> No.10292410

There’s a lot to criticize about this but the shoes are Baby (probably replicas).

>> No.10292411

was this tagged as lolita fashion? it looks like she's cosplaying the doll?

>> No.10292412

Are there even any good coords with BJD tights? Stop wearing them.

>> No.10292414


>> No.10292417

Godbless you for selfposting.
Good bumper crop of itas overall.
There's no way this is recent. It can't be, can it?

>> No.10292418

It was unfortunately

>> No.10292420

honestly this girl should get into classic or gothic, she has potential

>> No.10292465

Please tell me the other thread didn't get nuked because of minors.....

>> No.10292468

why go through all this work to blur and thin your arms with shoop when you could've just worn a fucking blouse

>> No.10292518


Honestly doubt it. It's not like anyone can even tell who's underage in that thread.

There's a bunch of unrelated deleted posts all over the lolita threads, so it's more likely some anon got the banhammer and the ita thread was collateral damage.

>> No.10292519

The coord is shit but I don’t think she shooped her arms

>> No.10292522


Armpits, anon.

>> No.10292523

I didn’t say she didn’t shoop her hairy pits, but I don’t think she thinned her arms.

>> No.10292536


Shoop one, shoop two, whatever. Anon is still right in that it's easier to just wear a blouse. Or at least put her arms down (but that would probably make her arm look fat, and then she would have to shoop it, so I guess a blouse is still the easier option)

>> No.10292543


>> No.10292555

Don’t post while high

>> No.10292557

Well I enjoyed it while it lasted, thank you dump-sama

>> No.10292559
File: 323 KB, 828x1162, 384B3067-648E-405C-A16D-7D6E5837E7F7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>lolita level: veteran
>sewing level: veteran

>> No.10292561

Itaness aside, she’s embarrassingly bad at sewing for a so-called veteran. The stitchwork is burning my retinas

>> No.10292562

Same. How does one get to “veteran” level sewing without ever figuring out how to draft a decent bodice?

Honestly I love the handmade thread on here but sometimes I wonder how many of the posters giving advice actually know what they’re doing and how many are self-appointed “veterans” who churn out shit like this.

>> No.10292568

It looks weird to me when this kind of ruffle thing is in the front and not in the back

>> No.10292601


I personally dislike bustle skirt jsks and don't mind front ruffles but a front ruffled panel isn't the biggest flaw on this dress. The person clearly did not properly draft or grade the bodice of this pattern for their bust correctly and it looks wonky and tight as a result. Normies that do little more than crochet would probably consider it an expert level of detail though. Non-trained seamstresses frequently think they're more skilled than they are because non sewers see them and are super nice praise them for even making the effort and it inflates their perception of their skill.

>> No.10292603

If she had just shortened the bodice and made this high-waisted, it would have omitted that lump below the bust and been a bit improved.

>> No.10292610
File: 198 KB, 720x907, IMG_20191120_145913.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10292611
File: 328 KB, 720x907, IMG_20191120_145830.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10292617

I’m not entirely sure but I think it was deleted because that one guy wouldn’t stfu, as well as people taking his bait

>> No.10292618


I doubt it, the biggest flaw with that top is the straight-across neckline that doesn't even seem to slope downwards for the armholes, there's no hiding that by chopping off the bottom of bodice. Plus hiking the waistline up would give her a blimp silhouette and the bust would still look boobloafed. Maybe her veteran status comes from sewing crafty things like pillowcases, because it looks like she just used a tube for the top rather than any kind of real bodice.

I was going to say making a skirt would look best since it would omit the top, but just going off this photo I think she doesn't have a lolita blouse to pair it with, and probably not enough skills to make one.

At least her finishing is decent. So many times you'd see newbies with puffy sewn stuff because they look down on pressing any of the seams or hems. Everything below the waist here looks nicely finished at least.

>> No.10292621

what bag is this? I’ve seen it around but can’t remember where it’s from

>> No.10292623

sometimes dresses don't work out

>> No.10292626

how new could you possibly be??

>> No.10292646
File: 405 KB, 1080x1080, 1565631368242.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Not a selfpost, but I keep a hall of shame for legendary tier itas.

>> No.10292719


It looks shoddier than the first project I did in my draping class when I had never sewn shit before

>> No.10292866
File: 310 KB, 720x907, IMG_20191121_002230.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10292867
File: 310 KB, 720x910, IMG_20191121_002202.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10292869
File: 291 KB, 780x1040, JmX3_PtwvYg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10292907

hi milanoo

>> No.10292917
File: 158 KB, 1080x702, Screenshot_20191121-004451_1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

This text seriously ran up and shanked me in a dark alley, stabbing more for each hashtag I read.

>> No.10292920

I’m not a living doll but if you happen to be looking through the livingdoll hashtag look at meeeeee

>> No.10292923

Hey where’s the picture

>> No.10292925
File: 2.09 MB, 1080x1422, Screenshot_20191121-005816_1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

She has used the hashtag-text in my previous post for every single one of these photos except the very last.

>> No.10292932

Typical weeb thot. Pretty much what I expected after reading all those >>10292917 spammy hashtags.

>> No.10292951

genuinely curious, where’d this whole tv head thing come from? I saw it all the time in 2015. is it from pre-existing media that I just don’t know about? Or is it some self-sustaining fandom like furries?

>> No.10292982

Not sure if it’s anywhere else, but I remember it from FLCL.

>> No.10292990

what I wanna know is how come all the girls like this have that nose?

>> No.10292991

same doctor

>> No.10293010

typical northern european descent nose. actually her whole face is really generic WASP face.

>> No.10293012

lol, white people

>> No.10293028

I live in a predominantly white country and have never met anyone with that bump on the end irl but they're a dime a dozen on Instagram and Tumblr. It's odd

>> No.10293036

Typical manfaced weeb

>> No.10293053
File: 917 KB, 2075x3005, Morticia-Addams-morticia-addams-40231793-2075-3005.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

She got a morticia thing going on

>> No.10293058

Idk, i'm a burger and most of the white people I see look exactly like that

>> No.10293070

its not lolita but she looks like she put a lot of effort into her hair and makeup. Gotta respect a clean ita.

>> No.10293073

She has shit taste though, that lace is ugly af

>> No.10293085

It got really popular in the vocaloid fandom especially when Echo came out that’s where I think it’s took off majorly from. Vocaloid, mmd and just devianart oc groups loved tv heads.

>> No.10293106
File: 221 KB, 720x895, IMG_20191121_111826.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10293106,1 [INTERNAL] 

"look i love wearing pastel pink im sooo harajuku fashion"

>> No.10293118
File: 272 KB, 1183x1917, 73E2B124-4E5C-412B-9C71-E3587D1DFB74.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>iT’s aP sO tHaT mEaNs iT’s lOlItA
No, it’s not lolita, you just look like a typical jfashion thot.

>> No.10293132
File: 10 KB, 227x222, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


Still kinda far. I'd describe the hairstyle as utilitarian, somewhat severe, more like low-to-no effort at all.

I mean, I'm not saying girls have to spend four hours doing their hair and wear falsies and circle lenses every time they wear lolita, but when you say "put a lot of effort" in, well.... she kinda still has a lot to figure out.

>> No.10293159

Protip, if your ass is actually hanging out it's not lolita.

>B-but muh HD and other oldschool
That's worn with bloomers and fits slightly longer or it's ita too (like when gemgem wore it)

>> No.10293164

R-style I think it is from, basically you can find it in most goth stores or eBay.

>> No.10293188
File: 159 KB, 569x853, 7HKcHiOXHX0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10293238

Looks more like LoveLive cosplay than lolita

>> No.10293252

Hookers wear skirts longer than that

>> No.10293300

People who put 4+ hours in makeup and hairstyling are people who only wear the fashion to cons or meets, though.

>> No.10293301

no one was going to argue that old school dresses are shorter? That's a huge reach. Are you new?

>> No.10293330

nayrt, but they said they AREN'T saying people need to put in work like that, but just that some effort would be better.

>> No.10293340
File: 154 KB, 720x912, IMG_20191120_002247.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10293341
File: 138 KB, 720x683, IMG_20191122_003153.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10293342
File: 183 KB, 720x712, IMG_20191122_003219.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10293344

nayrt but that's a valid inb4 because there are legit examples of short length done properly in lolita. >>10293118 however ain't it. bloomers are always a great choice, and having varying kinds to use should be a wardrobe given.

>> No.10293348

There’s actually so much wrong with this. Firstly it’s not Lolita. Casual Lolita may be hard to execute but use an actual dress AT LEAST. On top of that, sock length makes it all look juvenile and she needs a bang or something.

>> No.10293384 [DELETED] 

Further proof that Israel shouldn't exist.

>> No.10293395
File: 23 KB, 158x138, Screenshot 2019-11-14 at 8.20.21 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

this is everything lolita isn't supposed to be. is this actually tagged as lolita?
pic related, was reaction

>> No.10293396 [DELETED] 


>> No.10293403
File: 30 KB, 230x250, 1569630364858.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

My lita

>> No.10293416

obviously old school has different rules than sweet lolita.
why do people do this? who cares if you're a different person.

>> No.10293436

Yep, it was tagged jfashion and lolitafashion and bunch of ddlg shit...

I can feel your pain, sis

>> No.10293440

it's bro actually :p
i check out tumblr (wait a sec, you can shoot me later) occasionally and as soon as i see the lolita fashion tag, i see Polyvore collages of bondage gear and pastel skirts. they make Sugary Carnival look like an ageplayer's fantasy and it's not fun. keep your kink out of my egl, cunt.

>> No.10293449

Nayrt, careful you don’t cut yourself on that edge

>> No.10293502



- More than one person agreeing with/understanding the other anon, so if you're getting nayrt-ed a lot, maybe you were wrong to begin with
- they didn't write the comment you replied to, so they may not fully agree with/some facts may not apply
- also pls don't do the incel thing, we're not "all girls". You have brain enough to handle realising you're talking to different anons even behind a computer screen.

(nayrt btw)

>> No.10293522

Oops, sorry!

Well, i know that feeling. In my country there are lot of weeb girls who thinks lolita is about wearing frilly skirt with socks. Thigh high socks, so its always zettai ryōuiki instead of what lolita should look like. It can be almost proper lolita sometimes but ofc all aliexpress and replicas. They also love to do fetish pics, like footfetish, animewife (you know, all this onii-chan shit) and different "submissive" things, like kneeling or wearing collars.

Cause you can't be girly and independent at the same time/s

>> No.10293567

Spics should do Lolita

>> No.10293584

>also pls don't do the incel thing, we're not "all girls". You have brain enough to handle realising you're talking to different anons even behind a computer screen.
also most of the time people who use nayrt are obvious samefags who want to pretend there's more than one person with a bad opinion.

>> No.10293621


>reaching this hard

>> No.10293630

NAYRT but jesus please get some autism therapy and lurk more

>> No.10293631

mys tranny

>> No.10293712
File: 71 KB, 903x902, 71692783_173590687091699_6557833273135232821_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Some fresh itas for y'all. 1/8

>> No.10293713
File: 225 KB, 1080x1080, 71291766_149896419747092_201614992385114903_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10293714

why do so many gulls have to preface their posts with nayrt? why do you all assume samefag? I never see this on other boards

>> No.10293715
File: 74 KB, 1080x1080, 72777965_652327771988166_1142369191604857502_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10293717
File: 84 KB, 1080x1080, 73377067_2474989609387777_3398647555780774086_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


Because there's only a few of us, but we're all extremely active when we do post.

>> No.10293718
File: 636 KB, 1024x1024, 74623996_170423294018331_2323870543314023311_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10293719
File: 317 KB, 1080x1080, 75196143_107549150583758_4011625991612618253_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10293720
File: 67 KB, 720x746, 75208794_153577689204214_9117483517429683973_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10293721
File: 76 KB, 1080x1080, 75225433_1483045211872107_8813746738950546071_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10293723

the influx of newfriends like yourself is really taxing...

>> No.10293724

I started doing it after being confused for earlier posters and accused of “contradicting myself” several times. >>10293717 is right, cgl has a pretty small user base so people are quick to assume they’re arguing back and forth with the same person.

>> No.10293730

you do realize it's a relatively new thing, right...? I only started seeing it regularly in 2016

it's just crazy to me. if you search the archives there's 10 results for nayrt on /mu/ and 5000 on here

>> No.10293747


We always seem to get someone trying to argue with like 3 people and not realising it until half the thread is derailed, for some reason, that's why.

Although, given the speed threads derail maybe we do just attract all the autistic crazy ones that assume everyone else is one person, idk.

>> No.10293759

3 (soon to be 4) years isn't that new my dude.

>> No.10293760

i wouldn't call this lolita but i'm not really objecting to this weird mall-gothish look she has going on

:-) heh im a boy btw

this feels cruel, like mocking the disabled

>> No.10293919

$10 you’re a fakeboi

>> No.10293929

lol i guess i did a fuck up and did the "hurr durr am male" thing. sorry about that, anon.

>> No.10293942

She looks like the girl from the dollhouse episode of are you afraid of the dark.

>> No.10294013
File: 181 KB, 1058x1317, 902BB9CE-BE7E-4B07-8664-A20E7FC04523.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10294018

If you don’t like it then no one is stopping you from leaving

>> No.10294025

They're probably Saga or Saga inspired cosplays

>> No.10294027

who'd have thought an absolute unit like that would need sleeves to warm herself

>> No.10294049
File: 627 KB, 2048x2048, 741AE2B7-63DA-4543-9F09-A5BD1EED42EA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

how is this a glow up

>> No.10294052

She’s fatter in the newer picture lmao

>> No.10294082
File: 389 KB, 640x785, E9EEFC00-116D-4F64-B497-10FFAB792637.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10294083
File: 341 KB, 640x607, 5E5F1CA5-0494-4DC1-B9FD-FEAE13C9BF21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10294084
File: 577 KB, 640x793, 62471B1C-C2B9-439C-8CFE-E5738D3715D1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10294089

She went from nostalgically noob ita to obnoxiously tacky ita.

>> No.10294092

Fatter and the petticoat has turned into a lampshade

>> No.10294119

This is cute, not as lolita.

>> No.10294211
File: 179 KB, 1440x1440, 6416C2D1-9D5D-4D1E-B1F3-D12189C2B648.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

“from ita to lolita!”

>> No.10294216

Top tier cringe

>> No.10294222
File: 255 KB, 1080x1080, E1322D5C-CF84-452C-93EE-02A7F8B07623.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

She regressed by 10 years instead of improving

>> No.10294233

I was thinking that when i seen it! Like i actually quite like the first coord

>> No.10294235

How the fuck did this get labeled lolita? (I’m assuming that’s why it’s posted here)

>> No.10294240

big sissy energies from this one

>> No.10294241

I thought this too, what an awful second coord

>> No.10294244

Really? They look more like a fakeboi to me

>> No.10294245

I feel like this is how normies see lolitas

>> No.10294253

If a skinny Asian was wearing this you guys would love it

>> No.10294255

If a skinny person of any race was wearing it, it wild fit. So yeah, wear clothes that fit you, or expect your frumpy ass to be posted. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>> No.10294256

If a skinny Asian was wearing this, it still wouldn’t be lolita.

>> No.10294257

I wouldn't. The outfit is a mess regardless of race or weight.

>> No.10294265

Holy crap, can’t unsee
And awesome taste too

>> No.10294278
File: 367 KB, 1440x1440, 7703DB51-0CA5-479A-9C06-0FA0FD2E7FBC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>winning at lolita

>> No.10294279
File: 169 KB, 960x960, 3AE6C3FF-13EA-4408-9F8E-CCA27FB79C57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10294283

It's definitely fairy kei which is applicable in this thread. What does it not being Lolita have to do with anything?

>> No.10294284

>Winning at Lolita
>CTP knockoff

>> No.10294286

>I'm frumpier but I kept my parasol

>> No.10294291

How can you get that much worse??

>> No.10294292

what exactly makes the left one ita? legit curious.

>> No.10294294
File: 113 KB, 960x844, 76643693_10218289437880039_4532132525341933568_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10294295
File: 69 KB, 960x960, 76759952_1389399144560641_3898143636751122432_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10294298

The fuck is wrong with all of you mean girl bitches? Good god. Get a fucking life.

>> No.10294299

Sorry you got posted

>> No.10294301

Even the CTP girl is ita, what a great comm

>> No.10294306

How is she ita? She looks fine to me.

>> No.10294307

Most of them aren't ita

>> No.10294339

I personally think it's alright as fairy kei, though. I got my nitpicks for it, but it doesn't make my retinas burn.

>> No.10294341

The far right one is alright but far from "Winning at lolita." And that adventure zone cosplay coord mess isn't winning anything.

>> No.10294342

How can you still be making the biggest, easiest to correct, most nooby mistake of not wearing even a sad deflated petti?

>> No.10294343

At least the worst offenders are mostly kept in the back. Most of the front row ranges from meh-tier to pretty cute. The CTP is spot-on so I'm glad she's front and center.

>> No.10294344

>fairy kei
when will you gulls make a thread on it, I fucking love that shit

>> No.10294362
File: 151 KB, 800x450, cat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10294366

It doesn't fit and the socks don't match. Not eye searing but literally no one besides the kimono hime girl in the back looks good

>> No.10294368

When is the SF comm not ita and a huge disaster? You’d think there’d be some people who are kind of decent at coording given that they have TWO brand stores but that’s not the case.

>> No.10294375

Are you blind?

>> No.10294405
File: 267 KB, 720x714, IMG_20191124_060422.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10294407 [DELETED] 
File: 318 KB, 720x899, IMG_20191124_060443.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10294409

Somehow a chunk of that thread were filled with failed glowups and they somehow got worse than they were before

>> No.10294413

San Francisco Itas

>> No.10294428


Is cgl considered a worksafe board? Should this be spoilered? No one wants to end up accidentally looking at softcore porn and there was no reason to post if there's already a non sexual picture of the shitty coord.

>> No.10294440

there are no spoilers on this board newfag, this is a SFW board but it's borderline.

>> No.10294443

Its because she used lolita tags theres much worse pornographic shit in cosplay threads

>> No.10294451


Left one isn't ita but she's making a ten year comparison between left and right and it's really sad how much worse she's gotten.

>> No.10294452


I don't really check most cosplay threads.
An upskirt aimed at someone's pussy seems pretty NSFW.

>> No.10294453


Maybe come back when you're 18 then

>> No.10294458


You don't have to be underage to know that partial nudity/sexual images could be NSFW and not want to see them. It's literally in the name. If you wouldn't wanna get caught looking at it at work, probably not safe for work. At least a revealing cosplay could be explained away as being true to the character or something. This is clearly sexual.

The person was very obviously ita without the upskirt. The first image shows that pretty clearly. You must be some maleposter happy at the thought of people sexualizing a non sexual fashion or just itching to argue with someone.

>> No.10294459


This is no different than some of the cosplay threads, so again, come back when you're mentally 18. And stop looking at 4chan when you're at work if you're so afraid of people finding out.

>> No.10294460

Can you link these threads? I don't see any pussy shots personally.

>> No.10294462


If you think you need to be actually at work to understand the concept of nsfw and not want to see that stuff on a work safe board then there's no helping you.

>> No.10294463
File: 3.35 MB, 1363x2048, Screenshot_20191123-235554.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


Seriously, the state of this board these days. Go joint the MPAA if you're that offended.

>> No.10294464
File: 2.55 MB, 2048x1552, Screenshot_20191123-235729.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10294465

No spoilers on /cgl/
Lurkmoar newfag

>> No.10294466
File: 2.97 MB, 2025x2048, Screenshot_20191123-235753.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10294467
File: 523 KB, 1080x1078, Screenshot_20191124-000853~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10294468
File: 1.20 MB, 1080x1335, Screenshot_20191124-000716~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10294469
File: 627 KB, 1080x1072, Screenshot_20191124-001108~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10294470
File: 2.95 MB, 1732x2048, Screenshot_20191124-001436.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10294514

I did not realise it is the San Francisco comm does it mean the CTP girl is that girl with the hundreds Usakumyas? She is pretty cute usually.

>> No.10294519

That bear's sad expression omg

>> No.10294520

Is that thing next to the kid an agp?

>> No.10294522

She's so greasy looking...

>> No.10294523

I bet she has a blog about her boring life and gives shitty advice and even shitter tutorials

>> No.10294524

How do western lolitas manage to be so hideous? How old even are these chicks?

>> No.10294527

I feel bad for them. Like..... idk why, but it’s like those commercials you see for starving pets

>> No.10294528

Anon don’t post this, it’s clearly not Lolita.
Tf is wrong with you

>> No.10294540

Lurk moar and don’t come back even when you’re 18. Sorry you got posted

>> No.10294550

Saw the last fit IRL and it's actually stunning, idk about the others tho

>> No.10294571 [DELETED] 

I love the random normie bringing her best posing game on the far left. She looks like a photobomber.

Chanel? She’s actually female but she’s, well, Chanel.

>> No.10294572

I love the random normie bringing her best posing game on the far right. She looks like a photobomber.

Chanel? She’s actually female but she’s, well, Chanel.

>> No.10294582
File: 352 KB, 1440x1440, 20BEB220-44C3-42D6-936F-F5D75B184739.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10294596

Looks like fairy kei to me

>> No.10294607
File: 178 KB, 720x902, IMG_20191124_141829.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10294611
File: 176 KB, 720x719, IMG_20191124_141851.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10294613
File: 216 KB, 720x720, IMG_20191124_141918.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10294616
File: 156 KB, 720x720, IMG_20191124_142403.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10294697

A glow down. First coord is way better.

>> No.10294704

She is back into lolita looool no more beeing homeless

>> No.10294707

Is she fatter?
approaching death with no stop

>> No.10294709

Thank you for this, anon. Was puzzled why this monstrosity did now show up on here before. Seriously, everything about this looks wrong, from the weird kiddie plastic jewelry to the normie tee to the huge feet with unflattering shoes. Also, no petti, and no, this is not lolita. I cannot believe they are just getting asspats because “they have long hair” (which doesn’t even look nice).

>> No.10294714

Huge feet aren't even the problem, the shoes are ugly as sin. If they were cute lolita shoes then they wouldn't even be an issue, you can't help the size of your feet. Heels, even tiny ones, make feet look a bit more petite, but grass also has a way of eating heels, too. To start, she needs lolita heels on a solid surface.

And yes, I have huge size 9 woman feet. But at least I wear shoes that match my coords.
Thay said, everything else is spot on.
She should burn that OP. It's too translucent up top to make it look good with anything(or nothing) underneath.

>> No.10294716
File: 67 KB, 720x960, 74661770_10218220341552674_2836417855640043520_n-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10294718
File: 64 KB, 581x1032, 70276319_382210892685779_8463604614388776960_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10294719
File: 158 KB, 1612x2015, 72146883_10159131515922627_5623526999935942656_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10294721
File: 339 KB, 2048x2048, 75636043_946380775728691_3913024139358633984_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10294722
File: 150 KB, 1564x1564, 70213351_10157118354830345_6068081966480097280_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10294724
File: 206 KB, 1080x1080, 1573412513433.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10294725

To old for lolita

>> No.10294726

You're too old for fun. I plan to be a little old lady buried in my frills.

>> No.10294727

The person in that pic failed. I can't even tell if male or female. Could be some old ladies look nice in lolita but this is not the case

>> No.10294734

The tit literally falling out the side of the bodice is what kills me

>> No.10294737

Listen, the coord is a mess but if you couldn’t tell if she was male or female you either need to get your eyes checked or you don’t have much contact with older people.

>> No.10294752

Right? Anon must be blind.
The posted needs to focus on making a decent coord first, then consider makeup to accent their looks and minimize her stronger features a bit.
Just like how hair gets akward and frustrating to style at certain lengths, late middle aged until visibly wrinkly to a significant degree has an akward state. Better to focus on the things she can improve more easily.

>> No.10294784

>Last fit
Go back to /fa/, but also you're in my comm?

>> No.10294829

Ddlg vibes

>> No.10294840


How do you spend that much time on hair clippies in a wig and not having matching socks and shoes?! How does this happen?

>> No.10294842


I feel there’s an interesting vibe here that I could get behind. But it’s not lolita. Why are people so obsessed with calling everything lolita?

>> No.10294843


I don’t understand what’s happening with the fit here.

>> No.10294844


Because they are unoriginal or unsure of themselves and love labels/trying to define everything. Or in the case of social media they may just like to spam tags to get attention.

>> No.10294852

"Not eye searing"
Do we really need to break down the meaning of the word ita to you? If she's not eye-searing and the only thing wrong is a poor fit and non-matching socks (even though I think the socks are fine) it's not fucking ita dumbass.

>> No.10294853

When will the brands give Houston a proper store? The closest thing we had to SoW was the fucking Leighs opening a store and even that isn't there anymore.

>> No.10294866

There were SEVERAL serious glow downs on that thread

>> No.10294874

I didn't post it retard. Just offering crit since the person who did didn't bother

>> No.10294881

Kinda corny but it looks alright, the shoes work because of the country vibes. Hat isn’t great but overall this is a nitpick

>> No.10294886
File: 625 KB, 1080x1920, Screenshot_20191124-163537__01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10294888

after all the AM drama I don’t think Baby or AP will ever open stores there

>> No.10294889


Dallas is well known amongst people in Texas to have better quantity and variety of general "Asian stuff" among most Asians I know in Texas. They actually have Daiso, they are the main Texas location for many Japanese airlines' direct flights to fly out of. Dallas is away from the Leighs and their bullshit and would probably be a good place for a brand store.

>> No.10294891

Okay cool, but the anon I was replying to specifically said Houston

>> No.10294893


Yeah I was just mentioning a potential alternative city since Houston is an unlikely location at least for a while.

>> No.10294896

Gotcha. AP maybe, but after the failure of the NY store I don’t think Baby will be opening another US store anytime soon, they have significantly less international presence than AP anyway.

>> No.10294897

Do some people really think parting a wig's fringe in this way looks good

>> No.10294900

I think you forgot to censor something

>> No.10294903

I just noticed that too

>> No.10294905

bring back hoverloli 2020

>> No.10294906

she is not ita though.
lol, nice job doxxing yourself.

>> No.10294909

So? I was commenting on the one I commented on. It's not my job to respond to every one of them.

>> No.10294920

geez calm down, I was just sayin there were a lot glow downs, not criticizing you for not mentioning all of them.

>> No.10294961

The caps on SEVERAL made it read across real different. Sorry I misread your intentions.
Thay said, saying calm down is a pretty surefire way to make others get riled up.

>> No.10294962

I appreicate her going a little long instead of too short. Hair is a nightmare; face would benifit a TON from more dramatic make-up. I think, though the blouse is bad, the sleeve length is good. Of course she could use a freak'n petti but overall this is the most "i'm not embarrassed to be your friend" ita from a technical level.

Bad Lolita; decent "fashion monster". The leg wear could have been so, so much better though. If you are going to be a purposeful mess then you can't have plain white tights. You need to make sure everything is equally "noisy".

Baby lolita. Keep going; you got the idea.

Old enough to coord better. Really, I'm sorry; even if she is new she is too old to look this bad. Older people are suppose to be better at research.

Potential. Somebody get her into OTT Gothic

She's not allowed to wear white legwear. Why not pine green for this coord?

This one hurts my soul the most.

>> No.10294964

I don't think you're ever too old for lolita but one would expect by this age you'd know how to dress yourself at least

>> No.10294968

How ugly do you have to be to shoop your face this much and still have it come out like that

>> No.10294983


>> No.10294991

I mean, this looks fine as a normie outfit? Just not lolita

>> No.10294993

which dress is this?

>> No.10295088
File: 244 KB, 2048x1364, DyZKIoBUcAApgz6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10295099

CTP girl isn't Usakumya girl. Usakumya girl is next to her. (If I'm thinking of the right girl, that is.)

Do brands even do market research before opening stores? It always seemed weird to me that they plunked brand stores down in San Francisco instead of LA.

>> No.10295101

Isn’t that space lolipop or something

>> No.10295108

You can be wearing a lolita dress and have your outfit not be lolita

>> No.10295109

I was going to suggest she tie her shoes but actually, I think she should just throw them away

>> No.10295110

It looks shitty as a non-lolita outfit, too. Wtf is that plain t-shirt under that fancy dress? The Claires quality bracelet and head accessory? The scraggly hair? It looks like she just put on everything she owned in that shade of green. Fine for a teenager’s first real foray into alternative fashion, but kind of embarrassing for a middle aged woman.

>> No.10295115 [DELETED] 

4chan has gone to shit.
But Moot is returning and starting a discord server for oldfags only.
10 spots are open.
Invite link:


>> No.10295144

shes never tried to join the comm tho

>> No.10295171

"from real hair to ill adjusted wig"

>> No.10295215

this IS the thread, ita threads are jfash general, but people rarely post anything other that ita lolitas

>> No.10295217

>I plan to be a little old lady buried in my frills.
when kamikaze girls becomes your whole personality

>> No.10295218

then learn to nayrt

>> No.10295220

Oh man, that's your face. F.

>> No.10295235
File: 325 KB, 1080x1475, IMG_20191125_171439.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Ita + cringe + creepy

>and clean the fucking kitchen

>> No.10295244

disregarding that it definitely isn't lolita, i think this could look a lot better with either shoes that don't come up as high, or a full commitment to that shiny shit up top. rn it's unbalanced, way too heavy with it on the bottom.

a dude or a boi in need of assistance? this coord probably looked fine as a flatlay (other than the stupid hat) but holy fuck it does not fit. i understand that salos are adorable but Stop Now

>> No.10295245

fuck's sake you'd think he'd at least get his definitely not a serial killer expression under control

>> No.10295258

Is a girl , she has tits even if in the wrong place

>> No.10295309

There's more to me than my clothes, TYVM, but as this is literally a thread mostly about (poorly executed) lolita fashion, my comment was relevant. The rest of my hobbies and my responsibilities are not.

>> No.10295328

London comm being shady on cgl as always.

>> No.10295359

this is literally all the proof you need that CoF is an infested shitshow and that the fuckin screening questions AREN'T GOOD ENOUGH.

>> No.10295365
File: 1.60 MB, 1440x2560, Screenshot_20191125-140609.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

This is literally one of the publicly available photos on his goddamn FB profile, like fuck this is not a sissy.

the CoF mods aren't even trying this makes me so mad.

>> No.10295369
File: 328 KB, 1280x853, tumblr_mufx1wdSkP1qahsqho1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10295381
File: 419 KB, 1080x1920, tumblr_oqoxcikhNW1s312u3o1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10295391
File: 35 KB, 500x281, 1495594398448.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

HELP HER?? i want to buy her an outfit, her cute little face shatters my cold, hateful heart into pieces

>> No.10295393

Of course, this would be from tumblr...

>> No.10295401

Buy her a salad instead

>> No.10295403


She looks super sweet and genuine desu

As is it is definitely ita but if she had a blouse and headwear it would be an okay attempt at baby's first coord and her expression makes her look likeable.

>> No.10295414
File: 30 KB, 500x359, 1572229500252.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

be the lolita mom you've always wanted to be, anons. bless you both <3

>> No.10295418

>Chanel's potato ass trying to be uwu kawaii

>> No.10295419

Why tf is there a normie in the picture?

>> No.10295440


>> No.10295441


Sadly she is a perma-ita. Shes been in this fashion god knows how long and has yet to pump out a single good coord. She is unfortunately beyond saving

>> No.10295453

His name is Emily!?
More like Emile. Shave your fucking shadow and invest in a brush

>> No.10295454

I just wanna know what the comments were before it got chucked into oblivion

>> No.10295459

This isn’t even close to her first coord lmao

>> No.10295467

Your face looks kinda familiar, didn't you use to post in the larme group or something? Seeing this, I wouldn't be surprised if you're the one who posted the group members to the larme thread. Disappointing.

>> No.10295475

Not me friend, I'm not interested in larme

>> No.10295476

And they still haven't' removed it from the group. Gross.

>> No.10295478
File: 586 KB, 1440x2560, m7n52sg4qv041.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10295488

Id like to post some fairy kei itas but not sure what you prefer (not) to see . "I can't match colours" itas? "Jfashion is a fetish thing" itas? "I put on all pastels i was able to get on amazon and my grandma's dress"itas? "Fairy kei is about wearing cute girly pink dresses uwu" itas?

>> No.10295494

fetish thing can be excluded. the targets won't improve, and it will only attract horny shitposters.

>> No.10295496

From what someone else mentioned in another group just "This is the wrong group, take this to BsoLF" before (we're assuming) he dirty deleted.

Not surprised, the mods are non-existent and too lazy to properly filter out these people anyways. I legit left the group, I'm tired of it.

Besides all the lolitas on there with good coords post the same photos on Instagram anyways so I'll just follow them on there.

>> No.10295504

This is what happens when you allow trannies into any female dominated hobby. Thanks you retarded ass libfem handmaidens

>> No.10295511

No real trannies make an effort to look like a woman, the issue is letting in any man who says he's trans without doing anything to look acceptable

>> No.10295516

Honestly i would like this coord with proper poof, a better hat, and a less unfortunate pose and face. Posing can make or break an outfit imo

>> No.10295526

i feel like this isn't real and he is trolling us all.

>> No.10295547
File: 230 KB, 720x925, IMG_20191126_061729.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10295548
File: 256 KB, 720x1020, IMG_20191126_061806.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10295558

Are they mad about this? It’s true. You’re not an athlete if you just admire football players.

>> No.10295565

I would think people might be upset about the "successful" part, since that's very subjective

>> No.10295575
File: 358 KB, 720x880, IMG_20191126_072008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10295591
File: 398 KB, 750x798, A72EE76E-A3AE-4146-A568-C8E20618527D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.10295599

i feel like this is 2012-esque and too nitpicky. you sure this is ita?

>> No.10295606
File: 204 KB, 1080x1042, 74956766_601123320427842_3355255019311663842_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

post real itas

>> No.10295607
File: 293 KB, 1080x1340, 70921966_432366800785207_1334700119323869595_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10295608
File: 284 KB, 1080x1080, 73714026_254236938877645_6409961025733538768_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.10295610
File: 160 KB, 1080x1080, 73412365_182202066267143_2719531638015144385_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Seems like bodyline sent this dress to every costhot out there. Not a good look for them, since cosplayers generally don't know how to wear lolita dresses.

>> No.10295629

Nayrt but to me the trashy pose makes this ita.

>> No.10295630

Nice shoop

>> No.10295641


>> No.10295658

Hea not. He's got a whole Instagram and YouTube page that shows he's serious about the sissy shit.

>> No.10295717

I'd avoid any nsfw, but bad fairy kei/visual kei/etc are allowed to my knowledge

>> No.10295719

I think her coords are super cookie cutter, and I wish she'd get at least one other pair of shoes, but I don't see ita anywhere. Is it because her petti is showing? because other than that..?

>> No.10295725

This is in no way ita, keep your vendettas to yourself. >>10295629

>> No.10295726

Fuck off larper, in what world is that a trashy pose?

>> No.10295800

That cardigan can't even be buttoned up

Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.