[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 105 KB, 867x960, 83236169_1863952753736141_2296583828522663936_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332094 No.10332094 [Reply] [Original]

Old thread about to sage >>10328699

>> No.10332095
File: 50 KB, 720x960, 83202429_10157038632663652_975041096126038016_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332095

>>10332094

>> No.10332097
File: 158 KB, 720x960, 84528385_10221898089427584_1240241398075097088_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332097

>>10332095

>> No.10332100
File: 236 KB, 2048x1638, 83725584_10158093477670879_5136216162241085440_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332100

>>10332097

>> No.10332102
File: 185 KB, 720x960, 84633896_1312436835618538_5626427859502366720_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332102

>>10332100

>> No.10332103
File: 85 KB, 960x960, 83747034_2616822085203814_6755296997495799808_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332103

>>10332102

>> No.10332104
File: 219 KB, 633x662, B11ADC51-365F-495F-80E8-D474B609FFF8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332104

>>10332097
strong

>> No.10332105
File: 134 KB, 768x960, 83845007_10109497760563730_4770741834357932032_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332105

>>10332103

>> No.10332108
File: 132 KB, 661x884, barf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332108

>>10332097
I feel so sorry for the OP and i want to throw up a little.

Also the tacky attention whoreness of posting a picture of yourself in the comments of someone else's coord post. A ruins everything.

>> No.10332109
File: 67 KB, 518x960, 82927373_10218538249679112_254304077293289472_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332109

>>10332105

>> No.10332110
File: 170 KB, 960x960, 84351188_10158363831807518_9154405852902326272_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332110

>>10332109

>> No.10332112
File: 74 KB, 706x960, 83697106_2635294866792953_4150039534471479296_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332112

>>10332110

>> No.10332113
File: 124 KB, 720x960, 83394859_1805756482889435_676315434810605568_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332113

>>10332112

>> No.10332116
File: 41 KB, 540x960, 83798796_10212819987374008_124130554923712512_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332116

>>10332113

>> No.10332119
File: 65 KB, 720x960, 83316872_2763225033755515_1415609766083821568_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332119

>>10332116

>> No.10332121
File: 156 KB, 720x960, 84232080_2765872116831797_4471717294858305536_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332121

>>10332119

>> No.10332123
File: 85 KB, 960x960, 84444423_10162692442795315_3589620940285149184_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332123

>>10332121

>> No.10332124
File: 123 KB, 466x960, 83853507_10221412263604408_8413848908618268672_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332124

>>10332123

>> No.10332125

>>10332100
Shoehorned black bloomers are a no for me

>> No.10332128

>>10332094
I live for hair like this. How did they style that so perfectly?

>> No.10332129
File: 63 KB, 693x960, 83453446_2740003236267762_4508470717284614144_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332129

Fucking ugly

>> No.10332131

>>10332108
they are always so annoying

>> No.10332135

>>10332112
This looks so damn comfy. Wish she would fix her fringe tho

>> No.10332136

>>10332097
What's the ruffled white blob by her neck? The strong zero in one hand is a bit cringe too - peak chav levels

>> No.10332137

>>10332097
I really like this one. Her makeup and expression always look quite elegant for me, I feel it's a nice combo with the sweet coord.

>> No.10332138

>>10332124
She should stick to her natural hair.

>> No.10332143

>>10332108
This person is a textbook narcissist

>> No.10332149

>>10332100
The color balance is off.

>> No.10332157

>>10332100
It feels like she wears black wristcuffs and bloomers only because she have to mismatch for proper old school coord.

>>10332112
I want these earrings! And this is super comfy looking, mb if earrings were lavender too it would be just extra perfect but I'm nitpicking

>>10332123
This hippie blouse has to go

>>10332129
Pink + brown is so comfy together. Anyway, it's an average baby's first coord

>> No.10332273

>>10332105
Are my eye broken or are these black tights and completely clash with everything?

>> No.10332282

>>10332109
No! The JSK & blouse are too small, so if your clothes don't fit then STOP! The rest is just a no for obvious reasons as well.

>> No.10332283

>>10332116
Tripod, $10. What's so hard about getting a tripod??

>> No.10332285

>>10332103
This is such a cute coord

>> No.10332292

>>10332097
The blouse looks like some sort of disgusting plastic raincoat. Replace it and get rid of whatever she's drinking and this would be cute.

>> No.10332328

>>10332094
Absolutely love it, but I wish they would've chosen a more natural wig.

>> No.10332333

>>10332095
That edit is awful. What was she thinking? She knows how to match colors in her coords but not in picture editing? I don't get it.

>>10332282
I think JSK bodice could look nice with some shapewear. She's not bursting out the seams there, she seems simply to be near the max measurements. It's not a problem if you have something rigid under the bodice.
>t. large measurements because of big ribcage, medium breasts, no fitting issues even when near max shirring.

>> No.10332420

>>10332105
Why those tights? They don't work even a little bit...

>> No.10332464

>>10332100
It feels like she wore all this Btssb to prove all the lolcow-chans who just said "she doesn't wear any Baby" wrong.

>> No.10332481
File: 99 KB, 625x960, 84299911_10213801309821773_2002719576265064448_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332481

>tfw this goes for lolita nowadays

>> No.10332483

>>10332100
The black bloomers were a mistake, but otherwise I like this.

>> No.10332530

>>10332481
I fucking hate this princess dress stuff

>> No.10332532

>>10332464
yeah, I asked if she wore baby in another thread a few days ago, what a coincidence she puts every single baby item she owns on after I asked that
But it's not really a secret that she lurks here, she would (self)post often back in the day

>> No.10332533

>>10332136
I like that British term chav you guys use. Sounds better than saying “trashy”

>> No.10332540

>>10332136
maybe she was doing some flower viewing? it's pretty common to drink at hanami. also, the color of the can kinda matches her makeup/outfit with the pinks and yellows (although the can is more vibrant)
let a lolita get turnt anon

>> No.10332543

>>10332530
...what do you think sweet lolita has always been? literal little girl's princess dresses. it's just that one is too long.

>> No.10332560 [DELETED] 

>>10332136
>The strong zero in one hand is a bit cringe too
I think that looks fun and sorta meme-worthy, kudos from me

>> No.10332595

>>10332543
NTA but the dress looks more like classic than sweet. I think anon means long dresses specifically.

>> No.10332596

>>10332105
Solid white tights would have been a better choice than that

>> No.10332663
File: 30 KB, 750x720, 53435297_2111196395640882_888833813935816704_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10332663

>>10332481
all i see is two cosplays

>> No.10332664

>>10332103
Oof she looks demented

>>10332108
>>10332143
Trannies often are,are we surprised?

>> No.10332666

>>10332097
what the FUCK is that horrid blouse?
She's awesome (usually) but this coord is off

>> No.10332675

>>10332483
She mentioned she needs to get a pair in the right colour

>> No.10332707

>>10332100
I actually like the black details. It looks a lot more fun and interesting than going the "safe" route.

>> No.10332714

>>10332110
I feel like the blazer is too elegant/business like for such a busy dress. They have two completely different moods.

>> No.10332728

>>10332094
What a beautiful example for ouji but I would chose another wig color next time it looks kinda yellow.


>>10332103
I love her newer coords her look is very polished and cute but the dress needs to be ironed.

>>10332481
The right coord would benefit from a matching headdress this looks so unbalanced but the dress is stunning though I see your problem with it anon it doesn't speak lolita to me

>> No.10332881

>>10332540
I can't believe you wrote a paragraph defending this

>> No.10332888

>>10332103
I'd like this with just one headdress, instead of the headbow and ears + bow combo. Looks very cute with sax.

>> No.10332901

>>10332881
didn't realize < 50 words is a paragraph now

>> No.10333164

>>10332095
Why would you chose this background? It looks awful!

>> No.10333206

>>10332095
It's not a bad coord but those boots and the folded up towel train are kind of ugly

>> No.10333213

>>10332119
I wish she had a steamer or iron, but other than that this coord is balanced as fuck and it makes me feel good.

>> No.10333222

>>10332881
Why do you hate fun?

>> No.10333442

>>10332102
This is well-balanced I like it

>> No.10333581

>>10333222
Nta but you can have fun without flaunting your trashiness

>> No.10333716

>>10332129
If it's babies first coord then I think she will evolve just fine

>> No.10333741

>>10333581

>Having themed drinks is trashy
Have fun wearing your thrifted "jsks" and office blouses, lifestyler

>> No.10333954

>>10332149
Are you colorblind? It's an even balance of ivory, red, and black. Nitpick at most would be to add a red brooch to her headdress or cardigan, or a necklace with red or black.

>> No.10333961

>>10333954
all the black is confined to the bottom half of the coord.

>> No.10334316

>>10332675
Nitpicks that happen because of a lack of better items imo are preferable to just having shitty taste, but I can't imagine going out in a coord while realising the black bloomers break it up. Just wait until you have white bloomers instead of low-key feeling self-conscious over the lack of them all day. I'm not even a lolita perfectionist myself, I wear coords knowing different lace would have matched better and stuff like that all the time. Something as glaring as that, though.. just kinda reminds me of my ita time threwing together mismatched coords because I was so excited about wearing my newest dress out. Which is not a bad association altogether.

>> No.10334318

>>10333961
Nayrt but I feel like her dark hair mostly balances it out, but the wristcuffs are what throws it off a tiny bit.

>> No.10334374

>>10333961
Idk her haircolor makes it work for me

>> No.10334397

>>10334287
>>10334326

Lmao she absolutely did delete her whiny-ass “my life is horrible someone stole my coord idea” post, good riddance to that shit.

>> No.10334406

>>10334318
>>10334374
it doesn't work for me because the hair is brown. maybe if it was black.

>> No.10334416

>>10334397
>>10334326
Apparently someone did ask about the "stolen concept" and I think another one commented that those type of beef posts are very weird to post in CoF iirc

>> No.10334448
File: 147 KB, 1080x1619, 9C2CBA13-90D3-4797-88A4-FEF084E2AF7F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334448

Oof

>> No.10334456

Dump please?

>> No.10334468

>>10334456
why, so /cgl/ can tear more coords apart? y'all played yourselves.

>> No.10334479

>>10334456
There has been no real constructive criticism this time mostly insults I normally do a lot of dumps but i don't feel like doing it this time
it lost its whole point like this

>> No.10334481
File: 373 KB, 1612x2015, 42155C24-A4CF-49A8-8181-D44F18EF9874.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334481

>>10334456

>> No.10334482
File: 506 KB, 1511x2015, 0E266E83-B4A7-4B00-AFA4-1BE382B20124.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334482

>>10334481

>> No.10334485
File: 100 KB, 540x960, D95B39D4-3609-4FAB-B1F6-44D2AEAD64BE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334485

>>10334482

>> No.10334486
File: 367 KB, 1080x1250, EA0DCC4A-3886-49C4-9990-C21004E9E5AC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334486

>>10334485

>> No.10334492
File: 110 KB, 960x960, 4F3ECF24-9B9D-4628-A7E9-E57430A73BDB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334492

>>10334486

>> No.10334497
File: 121 KB, 640x1000, 06DC9DB5-0453-4016-B85A-FD8125673104.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334497

>>10334492

>> No.10334499
File: 495 KB, 1536x2048, 98473858-4701-41C5-88BE-BC200E85E8C7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334499

>>10334497
Please let’s not bitch endlessly about the strong zero

>> No.10334501
File: 121 KB, 690x960, 5FEBEAF4-2E8B-4746-ACA9-7F75749A64FD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334501

>>10334499

>> No.10334503
File: 944 KB, 2048x2048, 7F9CA129-EB8D-4DF4-A538-C69BBB327998.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334503

>>10334501

>> No.10334505
File: 143 KB, 1105x1719, 84A1FA9B-7FE7-4B84-9B44-15225EA55D8D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334505

>>10334503

>> No.10334507

>>10334448
Absolutely disgusting.

>> No.10334511
File: 847 KB, 1487x1981, 588D4EA1-5E71-4A71-A42E-317467F07B3E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334511

>>10334505

>> No.10334513
File: 119 KB, 720x960, 925B82B4-FC06-4A18-BCDD-EE70E48745CE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334513

>>10334511

>> No.10334517

>>10334485
This is almost perfect but the hat needs a bow or trim

>> No.10334518

>>10334511
I am so mega jelly of her hair.

>> No.10334519

>>10334486
I have to admit I normally like edgy old school but this misses the mark somehow

>> No.10334522

>>10334518
Me too

>> No.10334523

>>10334513
Took me a minute to figure out that she was sitting on something floating off the ground, I couldn’t make sense of the picture. Not a bad cord, but pretty standard and predictable. Half the girls in my comm wear something almost identical to this every meet

>> No.10334524

>>10334448
Should have posted it with the horrifying caption, anon.

>Hello
>I wanted to represent by this photo a very complicated period of my current private life. I suffer enormously and I needed to express it.
>but as I am tough, I will go up the slope quickly and the next photo will be positive.

>OP Lost Angel
>Tights Triple Fortunes
>Shoes Antaïna

>> No.10334527

>>10334499
I have the feeling that the only reason she included the can is because anons were sperging about it last time, so if that's the case this is an absolute Chad move. You go Strong-chan

>> No.10334529

>>10334486
There's always something off about her coords. Her lack of a straightforward caption and her edgy poetry make me eyeroll. Keep it to your Instagram.

>> No.10334530

>>10334448
Is this a replica? Because it looks like it

>> No.10334534

>>10334524
>suffers enormously because people don't want to be around perverts

>> No.10334536

>>10334527
Yeah I got the same impression. I kinda love it

>> No.10334538

>>10334529
For me I think it’s the shoes. They look like the special ed shoes that the kids with one super short leg had to wear. Like really puffy sneakers

>> No.10334539

>>10334511
this is cute casual, but the way she's been overdrawing her upper lip lately annoys me

>> No.10334540

>>10334486
Her coords are always mediocre with poor attention to detail and her edits recently are making it look even worse

>> No.10334542

>>10334481
It's hard to see much of the coord, is this really Lolita? It looks more like a Ren Fest outfit.

>> No.10334543

>>10334511
looks well-done to me - casual, comfortable, and balanced

>> No.10334545

>>10334523
This kind of comment makes you sound like you're a conlita. We have already had this discussion here and how asking people to be always creative and innovative on their coords makes no sense if you're wearing Lolita on a regular basis.

>> No.10334547

>>10334497
This is very cute and soft, even with the blacks. I find this print quite hard to coordinate, so it's nice to see it done.

>> No.10334548

>>10334468
Listen E, no one is "tearing apart" coords any more than usual. You're making your lurking too obvious.

>> No.10334551

>>10333741
don't lump me in with these fools, I like to have fun. My dresses are just clothes, I don't do anything much differently than I did before lifestyle.

>> No.10334584

>>10334505
I wish this had one or two tiers less of underskirt, even for OTT it feels too much.

>> No.10334596

>>10334479
hard agree

>> No.10334598

>>10334548
ayrt, no idea who E is but go off

>> No.10334604

>>10334486
I don't see how this is any more mediocre than ophelia?

>> No.10334625

>>10334486
I think her coords are simple and nice, just ignore the edgy edits. The coordinating is more authentic feeling than a lot of popular oldschoolers

>> No.10334654
File: 1.02 MB, 1280x720, oshiete galko action lines.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334654

>>10334511
Now this is the casual we wanna see.

>>10334518
I also love it

>> No.10334657

>>10334545
Nope not a conlita, I wear it almost every day. That’s why my coords have personal style and I don’t look like a taobao clone in “witchy” prints like this girl. No personality, no real style. Just a vaguely gothic/witchy/spooky printed polyester chiffon dress over a chiffon blouse, plain tights, stupid hat.

>> No.10334660

>>10334545

The irony is that the girl in the picture clearly wore this to a meetup, and it looks like a meetup sort of outfit where everyone is sort of low key trying to outdo each other, sceptre included. Nice bait I guess?

>> No.10334679

>>10334657
>>10334660
Not gonna dwelve too much on that as it would probably derail the thread, but that's exactly what I'm talking about. People buy things in sets in this fashion, reuse dresses and make their coords with whatever they have at hand. Unless you're obsessively following each coord done by that person, it's quite a reach to criticize it for being a cookie cutter. In this specific photo (or during her whole life, if that's the case). If you go back some threads you'll probably find this same discussion happening, anyway.

It wasn't a bait, and I don't know you so I can't say if you're a Conlita, just said that's something a Conlita would say, and it still is.

But that's enough, I have nothing else to say on that matter and I have the feeling that the second anon would just try to flame it further. Good day, anon.

>> No.10334683

>>10334660
>a meetup sort of outfit where everyone is sort of low key trying to outdo each other, sceptre included
What kind of meets have you been to?? Hunger game meets?

>>10334513
This is just an average coord but so is >>10334505
>>10334499
>>10334482
>>10334511
And so on... I feel like I've seen most of these coords already. Such is the state of this fashion

>> No.10334684

>>10334527
I'm hoping that's the case, but weren't people something about it only on cgl?

>> No.10334732

>>10334683
What are you talking about? Normally Ophelia's coords are boring and repetitive but this one is really cute and different

The girl in Haenuli I don't even recognize, if she's posted this coord I don't remember it.

Or are you saying they arent "creative" enough? Those dumb ass tall metal plate demonias were "creative" at first but look like shit in lolita and are being copied over and over. Same thing with the stupid ethot harnesses. Basic coords are good and nice to see, trendy shit is not cute in lolita

>> No.10334741

>>10334679

I wasn't that anon you accused of being a conlita. I just noted the irony of you accusing another anon of sounding like a conlita when clearly the original picture looked con-ish to begin with. It's just a corclejerk of conlitas accusing each other of being conlitas it seems like.

>> No.10334748

>>10334527
Nothing about that is chad at all. She seems like a tryhard retard.

>> No.10334802

>>10334683
you know that lolita is not about trying to out unique eachother right? something doesn't have to be completely unique to be good. Nothing wrong with being average if it suits the rules of the fashion.

>> No.10334805 [DELETED] 
File: 2.80 MB, 480x360, 12581651898.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334805

>> No.10334858

>>10334679
I’m not saying I think there’s anything wrong with a cookie cutter coord itself, I’m just sick to death of this motif, that’s the part I’m saying sucks, that it’s yet another occulty coord. It’s everywhere, literally half my comm wears nothing but this sort of witchy taobao stuff. I don’t see any true goths, very few sweets and classics, it’s all just witchy chiffon dresses. That’s the part I think is repetitive and boring. A basic coord is fine.

>> No.10334907

>>10334748
Sorry you're too much of a virgin to recognize her Chad powers
t.Chad

>> No.10334913

>>10334802
This attitude is having a big hand in pushing the more OTT, costumey trend that has been going on for a long time. It's easy to see why the fashion gets seen as a costume so often. I'd rather see a well put together outfit that doesn't have everything but the kitchen sink piled on it that some might call boring than one that's trying to out-do on 'uniqueness'. This sort of attitude has been growing worse over the years.

>> No.10334915

>>10334913
a unique coord doesn't have to mean ott or costumey. I don't think there's anything wrong with staying within your comfort zone of what works, but I definitely appreciate creativity in a fashion that can be so formulaic for many people.

>> No.10334916

>>10334858
>literally half my comm wears nothing but this sort of witchy taobao stuff.

I see it now, sorry I misunderstood. No one in my comm goes for this motif (almost everyone is a die-hard sweet), so I didn't get it at first.

>> No.10334918

>>10334915
Oh I agree it shouldn't, but it's how it seems to encourage a push towards the more OTT or costumey end of things.

>> No.10334940

>>10334479
and the coord in the first dump weren't even bad. Not the dumpsterfire we normally get from the group

>> No.10334953
File: 122 KB, 874x960, 84033297_2566500533596916_7837548951300472832_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334953

>> No.10334955
File: 9 KB, 195x260, 84312107_657442401659624_5956858776123342848_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334955

>>10334953

>> No.10334957
File: 131 KB, 854x960, 83673806_10208064281162025_3307461122449211392_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334957

>>10334955

>> No.10334958
File: 106 KB, 720x960, 83762111_10156733882021674_2720726172718596096_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334958

>>10334957

>> No.10334962
File: 109 KB, 960x960, 83904318_2716284608454519_4912243547719073792_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334962

>>10334958

>> No.10334963
File: 56 KB, 596x960, 84438174_10158394490521282_3986355788200280064_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334963

>>10334962

>> No.10334965
File: 75 KB, 960x640, 84588292_10157825781137591_7402465143558242304_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334965

>>10334963

>> No.10334966
File: 145 KB, 960x960, 84409591_3035547573124881_3347148024718557184_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334966

>>10334965

>> No.10334967
File: 82 KB, 768x960, 83940751_596740731057790_3976776860078964736_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334967

>>10334966

>> No.10334969
File: 14 KB, 195x260, 84396196_2800144010042396_3444067457856176128_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334969

>>10334967

>> No.10334970
File: 69 KB, 594x960, 83894047_10220126762413232_6169896240700981248_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334970

>>10334969

>> No.10334972
File: 174 KB, 960x960, 83666080_3462177047187265_6746202052059201536_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334972

>>10334970

>> No.10334975
File: 130 KB, 644x960, 84996397_1046071229078486_4266997489715904512_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334975

>>10334972

>> No.10334977
File: 90 KB, 497x960, 84270065_10108560169129515_5695859914262446080_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334977

>>10334975

>> No.10334978
File: 145 KB, 768x960, 83565598_2683615831727803_4354021588786479104_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334978

>>10334977

>> No.10334979
File: 124 KB, 960x960, 83823166_10213130436174939_2878759348346028032_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334979

>>10334978

>> No.10334981

>>10334966
She looks like she's stretching that OP's bust to the max and isn't wearing a good petti (is she wearing one at all?), the white blouse is also a strange choice. So close to liking this but all these things are letting it down for me.

>> No.10334982
File: 121 KB, 960x960, 83714329_3491277404278973_7385215227752611840_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10334982

>>10334979
Last one.
No fighting, derailing and being a dick or I won't dump in the future.

>> No.10334984

>>10334981
>>10334966
I don't hate the effect the white blouse gives and I like the amount of poof (minimal poof is my vibe), but I'd argue against her choice of shoes.

The nails also look amazing.

>> No.10334988

>>10334955
pic for ants

>> No.10334998

>>10334953
Looks like a lolita cosplay

>> No.10334999

>>10334981
It’s also that the waist of the dress sits right under her boobs, which together with the pale belt thing does not give a flattering look. It’s not an awful coord as an idea, it just doesn’t flatter her figure.

>> No.10335093

>>10334998
Sick burn.

>> No.10335097

>>10334977
Ugh I hate this hairstyle with lolita, pretty much karen with a bow

>> No.10335128

>>10334979
What the heck is going on, what is all that fappery supposed to be?

>> No.10335132

>>10334977
that huge headbow does not work with casual hair and small poof. you dont have to wear it just because it's a set.

she tried to go for pink, which was fine, but then tried to shoehorn in her red glasses with jewelry. it ends up looking bad. yes, there is red in the print, but you picked pink. make up your mind.

>> No.10335136

>>10335132
There's literally red in the print but go off

>> No.10335138

>>10335136
Nayrt but can you read?

>> No.10335139

>>10335097
It's... not the karen hairstyle at all

>> No.10335189

>>10334967
This is another sloppy coord from this girl.
The OTKs look thrown the color balance off and the skirt is such a mess. Those giant cross chokers everyone bought can be cute, but it just looks forced in.

>> No.10335191

>>10335189
*throw the color balance

>> No.10335223

>>10334966
No petticoat and looks like a sausage
Wth

>> No.10335224

>>10335189
When exactly are you allowed to wear those cross chokers if not with gothic

>> No.10335227

>>10335224
When you're not literally forcing them in under your collar.
I have one. They're chonky. She can't possibly be comfortable like that.

>> No.10335281
File: 773 KB, 1103x2048, B63A0C8C-90DC-4A52-9D1C-D2AEFD79957A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335281

>> No.10335282
File: 560 KB, 1125x2000, 0B4F46A8-7E6F-4766-8CA1-EA0C32F30DEA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335282

>>10335281

>> No.10335283
File: 314 KB, 1278x2015, E51317B8-901C-41BB-9602-ACB5EB8C6405.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335283

>>10335282

>> No.10335284
File: 153 KB, 640x640, 88B18510-5C47-4039-A0DE-291D20F3BCBC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335284

>>10335283

>> No.10335291

>>10334915
appreciating it is one thing, but complaining that something that is formulaic in a fashion which exists with a formula in mind is just dumb. Sure, average and boring might not be your cup of tea, but expecting more when people might just be going out to get groceries is just plain dumb. I have to agree with >>10334918. the idea people get when others complain someone is "boring" for wearing casual lolita or lolita which is mundane/formulaic implies they want people to go over the top in their uniqueness. It's really dumb. Boring=/=bad

>> No.10335389

>>10334972
Forever regretting not buying this dress when it was still in stock

>> No.10335474

>>10335291
Not any of the anons you’re replying to, but the complaint with the original coord was that it was costumey AND formulaic, which I agree with. I love casual lolita, I love seeing meta lucky pack skirts with simple blouses and lots of other formulaic shit people would deem super boring, but when everyone looks like they bought the same “fancy witchy lolita Halloween costume complete with big hat” it does make me roll my eyes a bit.

>> No.10335479

>>10335224
Probably an edgier gothic look. Not every look will work with them.

>> No.10335528
File: 127 KB, 960x960, 83444303_10162765904465702_7560485863780515840_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335528

>> No.10335530
File: 117 KB, 720x960, 83513313_10162912982735613_7611309380025188352_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335530

>>10335528

>> No.10335532
File: 161 KB, 720x960, 84706258_1077597949252809_4370318468528996352_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335532

>>10335530

>> No.10335534
File: 90 KB, 960x960, 84338085_2959784677399605_5218733552127967232_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335534

>>10335532

>> No.10335535

>>10334967
wow she looks fat

>> No.10335536
File: 133 KB, 708x960, 84983265_930075427394770_2895424074857578496_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335536

>>10335534

>> No.10335537
File: 56 KB, 768x960, 84142906_3088906871335143_6315082404641898496_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335537

>>10335536
well, I have no hope of catching up the posts, so I'll jump to the last posted ones.

>> No.10335538

>>10335535
what the fuck are you talking about ana-chan

>> No.10335539
File: 124 KB, 960x960, 84095585_660025614734636_1006548039906623488_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335539

>>10335535
Avoid this kind of nonconstructive comment or leave it to the feels or ita thread. Makes no sense to comment it over here on the COF thread.

>>10335537

>> No.10335540
File: 134 KB, 897x960, 84290840_10221822135128161_7384524395147952128_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335540

>>10335539

>> No.10335541
File: 116 KB, 775x960, 84559905_10221160874716410_2759812187588395008_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335541

>>10335540

>> No.10335542
File: 150 KB, 768x960, 84837472_2700103936749902_4995393393015128064_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335542

>>10335541

>> No.10335543
File: 101 KB, 640x960, 85151772_1414385378762504_9043401362280284160_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335543

>>10335542

>> No.10335545
File: 95 KB, 960x960, 84257508_2858917274176098_493918829563346944_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335545

>>10335543

>> No.10335546
File: 45 KB, 544x960, 84815697_215567702906175_1642383429427265536_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335546

>>10335545

>> No.10335547
File: 101 KB, 614x960, 84564755_10157902021631797_7285801887494832128_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335547

>>10335546

>> No.10335549
File: 76 KB, 768x960, 84334835_2774321095979242_8201733637943590912_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335549

>>10335547

>> No.10335552

>>10335539
Her coords are always so simple but lovely to look at. What is her secret?

>> No.10335568

>>10335552
I think good posing/angles go a long way t b h

>> No.10335591

>>10335542
I’m not sure about those shoes. They might look better on black socks, but I think they’re just too busy no matter what the sock color. Draws attention away from the dress, but I do appreciate the idea. Possibly there could be a similar shoe that does the wrapped up look better, but as is I don’t like the shoes.

>> No.10335593

>>10335547
The lavender blouse doesn’t go, besides the blouse the entire coord is white and pink and mint. Either change the blouse or add in more purple elsewhere

>> No.10335633

>>10335545
Is this even lolita at this point? Looks like office wear to me.

>> No.10335659

>>10335538
nice email, fatty

>> No.10335665

>>10335547
I really like this, but I have to agree with the other anon. It's always a good idea to match the top with the shoes, so a mint blouse might work, or lavender socks. Either way, cute.
>>10335546
This is really elegant and cute. Very simple and nice. It's not a big deal, but I feel otks would work a bit better here to even out the longer sleeves. I also think a cute brooch might be nice here too, but that's only a minor idea. Either way, this is really good for her first coordinate.
>>10335543
wonder cookie! I feel like I never see this print anymore. I love that the cardigan and hairbow match so well.
>>10335532
That is quite the nice closet! I think more navy accents on the socks would tie this together more, but she looks really cool! the gold isn't shoehorned at all. Can't see it all too well, but the wigs bangs seem unstyled? Cutting the bangs would help too.
>>10335283
I really love that she managed to take a busy and distinctly sweet print and give it a classic edge. Tieing in the darker shades of brown, rather than the lighter ones, really gives this a more mature feel. Also, great posing!
>>10334957
I really love how she tied in the pink, and left the mint alone . I think it works a lot better like that.

>> No.10335747

>>10335633
Cue the anon who aggressively argues that normie office wear is jfashion

>> No.10335752

>>10335541
That is a very short dress I can see her Petticoat how embarrassing!

>> No.10335937

>>10335541
Lay off the taobao goddamn. Not a single nice quality item in this "coord"

>> No.10335966

>>10335541
anyone know which dress this is?

>> No.10335971
File: 79 KB, 900x900, 1540870820997.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10335971

>>10335535

>> No.10335977

>>10335552
Buy the same basic items over and over again

>> No.10336002

>>10335546
What’s the name of this dress?

>> No.10336094

>>10335937
I don't think it's that bad? The colours match and the head piece is on theme. It fits her, at least.

>> No.10336139

>>10336002
Looks like Sweet Cappuccino

>> No.10336153

>>10335541
those weird shoulder epaulettes make it look like her jsk straps came off.

>> No.10336364

>>10336094
It doesn't fit though. Way too short and can't hold the petti. She needs to sell or give it to someone tiny

>> No.10336469

>>10335541
>>10335937
>>10336094

It's actually worse that it's taobao and nothing in her outfit looks like they fit or go together, given the handful of taobao that do custom size. How does the blouse look too big when the jsk looks too small? I have to wonder what went through her head when she ordered four random items that don't fit her, or was she scraping secondhand reject taobao to put together an outfit?

The plain tights and fugly shoes just kind of tops off how funky this outfit is.

>> No.10336492
File: 308 KB, 1100x898, D316F5F4-1634-4DA0-8BAC-E8AE4017B245.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10336492

> OP: Angelic Pretty Holy Lantern in lavender

Is this a replica or is she just fat

>> No.10336502

>>10336492
...both?

>> No.10336512

>>10336492
It's a shitty replica. Also what in tarnation is that leg wear?

>> No.10336617

>>10336492
She got called out for not indicating that it was a replica.
And i cant stand comments going "hurrdurr everyone deserves to wear their dream dresses" like stfu.
Art theft is theft.

>> No.10336624

>>10332108
Sissy’s strike again

>> No.10336630
File: 108 KB, 405x749, 9093C8D7-847B-4053-AE03-945DABF50D2E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10336630

>>10336492

This is what one of her friends was running to say

>> No.10336634

>>10336630
needs a valium with a rant like that

>> No.10336640
File: 146 KB, 1036x1440, 1489761972036.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10336640

>>10336492
more than likely replica

>> No.10336641

>>10336630
She seems balanced, measured, and well-adjusted.

>> No.10336647

>>10336492
All the people kissing her ass in the comments make me want to vomit. That doesn't even fit. Just because her giant cow tits can physically fit in that dress doesn't mean it looks good. Her fat has completely ruined the silhouette. The socks are hideous. AND it's a replica? Absolutely disgusting.

>> No.10336649

>>10336647
Calm down psycho the dress was clearly custom to plus size measurements and it fits her fine. Its just a replica with bad accessory choice

>> No.10336653

>>10336649
>fits her fine
She looks like an advertising pillar anon

>> No.10336654

>>10336649
If you look like a fucking cylinder bc your shoulders and tits are the same circumference as the hemline of your dress, then no it doesnt fit.

>> No.10336657

>>10336654
I does fit, the issue is that the dress wasnt sized up well enough. They just made it so that the bust/arms fit but didnt actually increase the amount of fabric to the dress at the bottom so it ends up being a tube.

>> No.10336664

>>10336630
Wait, I don't understand. Is Tyler good or bad in her eyes?

>> No.10336667

>>10336630
This is the best meltdown I’ve ever seen holy shit

>> No.10336676
File: 92 KB, 700x700, bb no.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10336676

>>10336630
>ankle biters
What the fuck is she even trying to say?
And if she's put off of wearing lolita forever by one person not likeing what she likes then desu she needs to rethink some things

>> No.10336684

>>10336657
>wasn't sized up well enough

I mean, I'm no seamstress, but that sounds like not fitting to me, anon.

>> No.10336690

>>10336684
It doesn’t. Not fitting means the person doesn’t fit the dress, not that the construction is bad. The dress would look bad on a smaller person because of the same issues.

>> No.10336697

>>10336684

not the anon you replied to.

The dress does fit. The key parts are the shoulder width sits right on her, the sleeves are the right length, properly gathered and even the cuffs seem sized right.

They also skimped on the skirt, because they're making fucking cheap REPLICAS, did you think they were going to make the dress the way AP intended it worn? No, they will skimp on everything and cut as many corners as they can. Look at the hem lace. I don't think it's even ruffled, let alone ruffled enough.

I just had to point this out. This isn't just some "stupid fat girl again". The replicamakers know exactly what they're doing. They can size up just fine. They just don't want to, because that means wasting profits on your replica dress.

Don't shift the blame away from that just because you want to wank on some fat.

>> No.10336712

>>10336676
I think she meant to say "bootlickers", meaning somebody who supports something authoritarian or oppressive, but instead she used "ankle biters" which is slang in some places for children or small breeds of dogs.

>> No.10336726
File: 196 KB, 750x1624, 90E68DE6-41B8-45BA-8607-FFAF25CDD43D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10336726

>>10336630
Another person in the comments with no brains

>> No.10336727

>>10336630
deleted already? I didn't see it in the comments on cof

>> No.10336732

>>10336727
Yeah the mods have been quick to be deleting everything, but are refusing to delete the actual post

>> No.10336733

>>10336732
Kinda ironic that the admin are justifying deleting the more nasty comments by saying that leaving them up would condone the behaviour, but leaving a replica coord post up isn’t condoning replicas. Hmmm

>> No.10336748

>>10336726
Kek, what a tard. Probably one of those idiots that can't shut up about politics even when it's completely irrelevant.

>> No.10336754

>>10336733
That isnt what irony means. I think having like 300 ppl tell you that replicas are shit shows that it isnt being condoned by the community.

>> No.10336761

>>10336733
condoning and tolerating are two different things

>>10336754
half the comments are shitting on replicas and the other half are saying it's not a big deal. if anything, it's showing that the community is as split on the issue as it has always been

>> No.10336807 [DELETED] 
File: 110 KB, 1241x477, C31A6846-90A5-4145-9D5B-07AEDE0115B4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10336807

>>10336726
This was my favorite little melt down. She was projecting big time, no one even mentioned the term poorfag

>> No.10336810

>>10336807
where's the lie tho

>> No.10336813

>>10336810
i forgot it's 2015, my bad! can we stop with this brandwhore meme? we both know damn well that there are a lot of popular and even coveted taobao brand dresses.

>> No.10336816

>>10336813
are you really pretending this board respects taobao and sees it as legitimate lolita

>> No.10336819

>>10336816
>the board is the entire community

>> No.10336825

>>10336819
i mean most lolitas come here even if they claim not to, so it's a big chunk of it. i do think it is a better representation than the coddling hugbox that is facebook

>> No.10336826

>>10336697
>This isn't just some "stupid fat girl again".
She's stupid for buying a shitty replica

>> No.10336832

>>10336825
>most lolitas come here
nayrt but we have like 99 posters in this thread.
Considering that many of them are just people with dynamic IP, I'd say we have, at most, 60 different people around the place.
That's not even half the size of the biggest comms out there.

>> No.10336833 [DELETED] 

>>10336832
>implying that the big fb groups aren't filled with lolitas at heart, sissies, and fetishists rather than actual lolitas

>> No.10336836

>>10336832
lurking is a thing, anon. there was a thread recently discussing the huge influence of cgl on the fashion even outside of here

>> No.10336838

>>10336836
the thread has like 10 replies, dude. plus if they lurk they aren't the ones posting about those opinions, now are they?

>> No.10336840

>>10336492
I'm honestly astounded that she really thought she could pass off this piece of shit as the real thing., especially a dress that 90% of the lolita owns.
I immediately thought of this pic when I saw it
>>10336640
I'm just happy that plus size lolitas were there to dunk on commentators with their legit holy lanterns. There's no excuse for this.

>> No.10336844

>>10336726
this is so fucking funny, do they think that by wearing a replica they're the rosa parks of lolita? what???

>> No.10336848

>>10336807
This fuckin chick is bonkers. She's blocking people for disagreeing with her even politely. While going around insulting everyone. I'm enjoying this whole thread.

>> No.10336849

>>10336838
ok anon, if you want to believe that lolitas are positive, accepting lovelies then go for it

>> No.10336851

>>10336848
How can you tell who someone has blocked? Other than if they blocked you

>> No.10336854

>>10336851
I have a couple of friends on that thread that suddenly can't see her comments hahah. Since I'm just lurking, I get to see all of the nonsense from her end playing out.

>> No.10336856

>>10336807
>not censoring the name it replies to
Tis you anon? I swear to god gulls just keep doxxing themselves

>> No.10336858

>>10336856
Whoops, the name wasn’t highlighted like Facebook usually does so I didn’t even notice. Sorry.

>> No.10336867

>>10336640
Is the one on the right a replica , because it looks like it

>> No.10336869

>>10336849
no one is saying that, we just want you to throw down the evidence.

>> No.10336876

>>10336492
I'm really curious if the Asian lolita communities get so aggressive over replicas or is it just white people who feel the compulsive need to constantly argue about it

>> No.10336877

>>10336876
You haven’t been in Lolita fashion very long, have you? Even the creators of the main brands have stated that replicas hurt their business and not to buy them. They are illegal.

>> No.10336880

>>10336876
replicas are considered shitty and embarrassing everywhere anon.

>> No.10336881

>>10336832
the census alone indicates more unique users than that

>> No.10336882

>>10336877
Of course brands don't want anyone to buy replicas for business reasons. I'm talking about the actual girls in the communities. I can't imagine Japanese lolitas openly shame each other for (or defend) replicas with their names attached (maybe anon on 2ch I guess, probably still not anywhere near this level of assmad though) and I really doubt Chinese lolitas care at all

>> No.10336883

>>10336876
Asian community is more aggressive since some “design replica” are allowed here in the western community like fb and lm (which I don’t understand why)

>> No.10336885

>>10336882
Chinese lolita who’s actually in the community that wears replica will get called out and posted everywhere online, stop that Chinese people love replica stereotype anon

>> No.10336886
File: 19 KB, 704x518, japanese1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10336886

>>10336882
Simple googling of repurikaa + rorita proves you wrong.

>> No.10336887

>>10336885
Do you not know about the social credit system? Chinese have to be really careful what they post online or they'll be fucked. So while they might verbally say something, they wouldn't spread it around online

>> No.10336889

>>10336886
This is a gentle, respectful post though, not aggresively shitting on people and calling them names

>> No.10336890

>>10336880
Replicas of designer brands are easily available and accepted in a lot of countries, so not really

>> No.10336892

>>10336882
you're clearly full of shit. japan is absolutely huge on brand loyalty in many aspects of their culture. this extends heavily into any street fashion in order to preserve it and keep brands from closing. plus replicas come from china and most japanese people are pretty racist/ignorant about china in general.

>> No.10336893

>>10336889
You don’t know how Japan works, do you anon? Your posts make you sound incredibly new.

>> No.10336894

>>10336887
Well that’s another story but not for lolita, you can talk about lolita as much as you want online.

>> No.10336895

>>10336889
>what are japanese people
she's not even calling someone out specifically.

>> No.10336896

>>10336892
Ok but Japan is also not big on aggression and public fighting. I didn't say they wouldn't be against it, just that they don't cause big public fights about it

>> No.10336899

>>10336894
Also the people making/ selling replicas are not the people from the community, more like ali express nomies. Chinese lolita community is strict about replica end of discussion.

>> No.10336900

>>10336894
Not true. There used to be a Chinese lolita drama site (Chinese Gossip anon, if you remember her, linked to it a few times) but it was quickly shut down when the social credit stuff came along. You won't find anything like that anymore

>> No.10336901

>>10336899
Do you have any proof or no?

>> No.10336902

>>10336894
>>10336887
chnese girls barely care about replicas because their culture is about the appearance of wealth before it is about actual wealth. plus the rich lolitas in china that can afford lolita are super super rich and the people wearing them aren't even on their radar. $400 in some areas is the average rent per month, so it's not like lolita is easily attainable by the average girl there.

>> No.10336903

>>10336896
they still openly shame eachother, just not in an aggressive way. they will make backhanded remarks at you in front of others and then suddenly you won't be invited anywhere. if it's online, they'll do the same thing and just unfollow you. you're arguing semantics now because japan's culture is non-confrontational in the western sense, but they aren't non-confrontational period.

>> No.10336904

>>10336889
because of the way Japanese language works, it's pretty difficult for it to ever sound aggressive

>> No.10336906

>>10336901
Dude I’m Chinese and I can easily show you some calling out replica-Chan drama on Weibo, but only if you can read Chinese tho??? Everyone knows that the main person that sells replica usakumya in China is a middle age women that just got her nose in the fashion

>> No.10336908

>chinese lolitas hate replicas
>japanese lolitas like them
spot the chinese lolita, guys.

>> No.10336910

>>10336902
Do you know about their fuck up economic issues recently? They have this app by alibaba where everyone over 16 can do advanced shopping( like payment plan) with no interest. So yes they could easily afford brand dresses but they buy and sell a lot that’s how they keep up with the latest release.

>> No.10336911

>>10336906
Yes, please go ahead and link to where Chinese girls aggressively shaming each other and have big public fights for wearing replicas. I'm on weibo as well and never seen that.

>> No.10336913

>>10336903
That answers my question then. They ignore and unfollow or unfriend instead of fighting and namecalling. Much more mature than us.

>> No.10336917
File: 259 KB, 640x817, B9304AFF-F94C-44FB-A362-6A3948927C66.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10336917

>>10336911

>> No.10336918

>>10336840
Anybody who is plus size can find stuff to fit into. This is not 2010 anymore. No excuse for it.

>>10336867
Affirmative.

>> No.10336919

>>10336917
Link the post.

>> No.10336920

>>10336911
Search 山 under this account and you see all kinds of name calling, I don’t what what’s your standard for aggressive but to me some of them are

>> No.10336921

>>10336919
https://m.weibo.cn/6761028180/4468966007195661

>> No.10336927

>>10336921
The only comments that are even close to "aggressive" on here are the few saying calming stating that they don't believe there's a valid excuse to buy it. They aren't targeting or shaming a specific girl, nor are they calling girls who buy it thieves or criminals, or trying to start a big fight about how morally wrong it is or whatever.

Anyway thanks anons, you have confirmed for me that the Asian comms are not at all aggressive about it even when they disapprove.

>> No.10336929

>>10336919
Not even that anon but you surely like to be spoonfeed don't you

>> No.10336931

>>10336927
>nor are they calling girls who buy it thieves or criminals
Saying something is "art theft" doesn't mean you're a thief for buying it, it just means you're contributing money to an art thief.

>> No.10336932

>>10336927
>aggressive about it even when they disapprove.
Expecting asians to behave like americans

>> No.10336935

>>10336927
That thread is pretty salty. Just because you can't read the cultural context doesn't mean it's not aggressive.

>> No.10336937

>>10336927

as other saids, they're probably toning it down thanks to the social credit score bullshit.

>> No.10336938

>>10336927
I’m not the anon that said Asians could be aggressive, I was saying Chinese lolitas don’t accept replica, you get my point

>> No.10336939

>>10336931
There were people straight-up calling that girl a thief in the FB post, though those are deleted now. Not the first or last time it's happened either. Politely mentioning art theft and its affects, and calling someone names to insult them as a person are two different things.

>> No.10336942

>>10336935
It's not even targeting a specific person, so no it's not very aggressive. Stating that you don't approve of something, or making fun of it as whole is different than aggressively attacking a specific person.

>> No.10336946

>>10336761
The community is NOT split on this issue. Look at the profiles of the people condoning them. All furries, normies, ddlg, etc. Not real lolitas.

>> No.10336948

>>10336946
there is absolutely a huge split in the community. it's split three ways actually:

a) people against ANY kind of replicas, even shoes and bags
b) people who are ok with design replicas but not print replicas
c) people who are ok with any kind of replicas

most of the tension is between groups a and b, there's definitely not a consensus on it and never has been. not a lot of lolitas in group c, but they do exist

>> No.10336949

>>10336913
it's not mature by their standards that's what i'm trying to say. try living in a place where instead of being able to tell someone you don't like them, you instead invite them around with you and bully them till you get bored. that's how japan is.

>> No.10336951

>>10336948

That sounds like our community desu.

I can't really speak for everyone's experiences, but hanging around chinese fobs thanks to my fiance, they're kind of obsessed with getting real brands such as LV or Louboutin and hate the replica industry in China. Most people will take a suitcase full of normie brand back to china as gifts their friends if they can afford it. Obviously, they're not a hivemind and there will be dissenting opinion, but that's just my observation of richer mainlanders.

>> No.10336952

>>10336939
Oh k, I didn't see the deleted messages.

>> No.10336953

>>10336887
This is literally irrelevant anon, the social credit system only applies to people who break the law
https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/social-credit-mou-breakdown-beta/?fbclid=IwAR01pEV63i62Hcs4Uj7Jp_7BOu-VTK-_RX7l3_5T1IumxTtRkpC6g5G5Mxw

>> No.10336959

>>10336910
can people from HK get in on that?

>> No.10336967

>>10336910
Why do you make this sound like some unimaginable thing. We give 18 year olds credit cards, that's basically the same thing

>> No.10336993

>>10336951
I mean, I'm sure there's people who hate it, but fact is you can't take two steps in China (or HK) without tripping over designer replica items. I saw a video recently where street markets were selling fake Adidas literally right next to an actual Adidas store. It's something that's just not really cared about one way or the other there, in the normie culture anyway. I feel like the same probably goes for lolita.

>> No.10336994

>>10336959
I think you need a mainland id, I couldn’t because I don’t have one. It’s call huabei

>> No.10336996

>>10336993
Not if you only buy from shopping service , that’s what most Chinese lolitas do.

>> No.10337001

>>10336876
>Lolitas should be lovelies!
>Asians are docile and polite, unlike whites!
Fuck off retarded weeaboo

>> No.10337005

>>10337001
butthurt whitey detected

>> No.10337022

>>10336876
I can't speak for asian lolita communities. but growing up in an asian household and community I can say we can be pretty mean and agressive about things

>> No.10337041

>>10337001
>being aware of cultural differences is racist

>> No.10337074

>>10337005
Try again

>>10337041
I can tell you aren't asian

>> No.10337075

>>10337074
>i'm not like other asian girls!!!!!!

>> No.10337506

>>10336882
Good one about China. They see it as poor peasant clothes for fat Americans and peasants.
The Japanese shun bodyline replicas clothes and won’t speak to those who wear them unless they have no choice and even then very basic dialogue will be used.

>> No.10337599

New thread >>10337274

>> No.10337612

>>10336951
okay J*nny, nice humblebrag

>> No.10340149

>>10335530
weirdly, he face looks worse with bangs. Maybe it's just the way they're cut though.

>> No.10340158

>>10336649
either you're high, or not sorry you got posted replica-chan.

>> No.10340162

>>10336761
the only people in that thread defending replicas were lolitas at heart. CoF needs to remove anyone who's never posted a coord. If you're a real lolita you can rejoin and post a coord, but this shit is so out of hand.

>> No.10340163

>>10336825
I know for a fact that half of my comm comes on here. They don't say it outright, but I notice discussion topics, lingo, etc IRL in my comm. I think if half of us are in there that there are probably a lot more than 60 posters.

>> No.10340166

>>10336869
>evidence on an anon board
Nayrt And how exactly would one do that?

>> No.10340168

>>10336876
This is hilarious, have you met asian people? They will tear you to shreds for doing/saying/wearing the "wrong" thing societally. Japanese lolitas also don't need to buy replicas since you know, capital of burando

>> No.10340170

>>10336890
they're illegal and frowned upon unless you're a poorfag who thinks they're tricking the rest of us into believing that they have the real thing. No one says anything to you, but we all think you're trashy. pretending to be rich as opposed to just not doing any of that appears so sad and desperate

>> No.10340171

>>10336900
There's still plenty posted on weibo daily, where are people getting the idea that the government cares about discussions on lolita? They're monitoring a lot of things, but this fashion not at all. I could see a site dedicated to drama being taken down however.

>> No.10340601

>>10336927
you just don't understand the culture. I've never seen someone on an anon board double down on their cultural ignorance when seemingly so many anons are telling you that you're wrong. Reality TV has really done a number on your country, huh? Public shaming looks different depending on your geographic location.