[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 259 KB, 500x2141, cosplay.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6803928 No.6803928 [Reply] [Original]

How did you get your start? Who introduced you to the scene?

>> No.6803992 [DELETED] 
File: 43 KB, 640x480, 1365485336920.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6803992

>first con AX 2009
>im like 13 y/o just thinking wow woah cool taking pictures of every cosplayer
>fast forward AX 2011
>ohfuckohfuck emergency 2week cosplay just for fun
>cosplay goat butler from umineko (its really bad)
>get a lot more attention then i'm used to
>loving it
>get motivated and happy that im meeting new people and starting to graduate from autism-mode
>decide to start lifting heavy things so i can look better in cosplay
>eventually realize that i want to get fuarrking huge, don't really care about aeshtetics anymore
>lifting is my life now, and cosplay secondary
>tfw i might make it

so eh, just decided to cosplay on a whim. loved the attention I got and it also made me pick up something which I'm extremely enthusiastic about now.

>> No.6803995 [DELETED] 

Holy shit, that picture reeks of tumbler butt ravaging. I really hope whoever drew it gets cancer.

>> No.6804007 [DELETED] 

>>6803995
Thanks for proving the picture's point.

>> No.6804018 [DELETED] 

>>6804007
Thanks for proving your own inner misogyny by assuming that I'm male just because I don't accept your cancerous opinions.

>> No.6804031

>>6803992
if that is you, you actually look super cool :3

>> No.6804035 [DELETED] 

There's nothing misogynous about being against "fat acceptance".

>> No.6804036
File: 2.64 MB, 320x240, 1366230425832.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804036

>>6804031
No, it's not.

>> No.6804054

>>6804031
lul
>/cgl/ in charge of being not naive, just for once

>> No.6804075

>>6803992
2009 you're 13. Now you would be 17. Would it be so hardqto just add a year?

>> No.6804077 [DELETED] 

>>6804018
...who said anything about you being male?

>> No.6804086 [DELETED] 

>>6804018
Way to show how batshit retarded you are. You don't have to be male to be an asshole.

>> No.6804105

>>6804075
Depends on the day too. His birthday could have been after the con.

>> No.6804110

>>6804105
Ax wasnt until july. Doesn't add up

>> No.6804112 [DELETED] 

>>6804077
>>6804086
Not OP but the picture quite obviously stated it.

>> No.6804120

>>6804110
you're right. Oh well.

>> No.6804130 [DELETED] 

>>6803928
>that comic
>describing how women use "geekdom" to advertise themselves to seek acceptance and attention
>gets angry and entitled if it's not the kind of attention they want

If you're in it for the attention you probably don't care very much, if at all, about the subjects you supposedly take an interest in. It wouldn't even matter.

>> No.6804133 [DELETED] 

>>6804086
>>6804077
Sad tumbler is sad.

>> No.6804156 [DELETED] 

>>6804133
wait- doesn't almost all of /cgl/ go on tumblr? I mean, we have a huge ass tumblr page often. Is going on tumblr an insult or is it only an insult when it comes to discussion of gender, weight, etc? I don't go on tumblr..

>> No.6804163 [DELETED] 

>>6804156
> Is going on tumblr an insult
Well, it's a website that became worse than Facebook in terms of reposted idiocy, so yes, it's not exactly something you should pride yourself with.

>> No.6804173 [DELETED] 

>>6804156
Tumblr is an insult when you're on 4chan like 4chan is an insult when you're on tumblr. They're different websites with a large overlap in purpose (sharing and reposting pictures, discussions about nerdy interests) but a very different culture and atmosphere. There's going to be some rivalry there, even if many people do visit both sites.

>> No.6804175 [DELETED] 

>>6804156
Discussing gender and weight is perfectly fine. Being raging misogynists and misandrists is retarded though. I don't know what the terms would be for the weight issue.

>also fat is unhealthy

>> No.6804182 [DELETED] 

>>6804173
>like 4chan is an insult when you're on tumblr
Only among the transfatanticiswhitemaleprivilegemilitantatheisttortoisekin community maybe.

>> No.6804195 [DELETED] 

>>6804175
but fat is unhealthy

>> No.6804205 [DELETED] 

>>6804195
>No source.
It's only biased kyarchy science that says that. And we don't actually know what causes fatness. Modern research implies that it is a genetic disorder people are born with, so if you dislike fat people you're being the same as racist Nazis and woman-haters.

>> No.6804208 [DELETED] 

>>6804182
Are you kidding? In lots of placees "go back to 4chan" is an equivalent of "you're an idiot". It's not a tumblr thing.

>> No.6804219 [DELETED] 

>>6804208
Perhaps, but those boards are the worst places on Internet (Nintedo forums for 12 year olds, etc).

>> No.6804233 [DELETED] 

>>6804205
Fat is only unhealthy based on what you're eating or what your lifestyle is like. If you're a fat vegan, a) how the fuck did you manage that, and b) you're probably fine.

Thin people can be unhealthy too, they just have a different caloric intake and metabolism. Body size doesn't equate with health when you ignore diet.

>> No.6804238 [DELETED] 

>>6804035
no, it's just stupid to be against it. fat people want to be happy, why do you want them to not be happy? because they're fat? if so fuck you. nobody's making you feel bad for what size you are. just leave people alone, it's not your job to make everyone miserable.

>> No.6804239 [DELETED] 

>>6804205
>>6804233
I love you guys
It's nice to see educated people in /cgl/ for a change.

>> No.6804240 [DELETED] 
File: 152 KB, 1082x1212, 1367168667791.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804240

>How dare comics have hot women in them! How are regular women supposed to compare? This is degrading!
>brb schlicking to LinkXSephiroth yaoi

>> No.6804252 [DELETED] 

Here's a fat person telling you why you shouldn't tolerate him being fat
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpNRw7snmGM

>> No.6804267 [DELETED] 

>>6804240


It's degrading not because they're hot but because they're presented as sexualized pieces of meat. When all the dudes are jacked demigods clad in full plate and the one girl is wearing a fucking bikini and bending over for everyone, that's just masturbatory material, and it's fair to call it that no matter how the neckbeards complain that people aren't taking their 2deep and 2adult series/game/book seriously.

>>6804205

This, however, is ridiculous. Genetic disorders are the product of hundreds of years of mixing and breeding between people and often have a long, well-documented history.

On the other hand, all these "genetically obese" people only started showing up in the past three decades, when a) corn syrup subsidies started, b) food portions ballooned, c) processed foods became immensely popular and accessible for the general public.

Of course, the fact that being obese is a result of eating too many empty calories means that once you have the information, it's a *choice*. And choices are unpopular, because personal responsibility hasn't been in vogue for a long time.

>> No.6804269 [DELETED] 

>>6804240
more like
>fat girl cosplays
GROSS. Man the harpoons!
>hot cosplays
I bet you didn't read the comic, attention whore. Go suck on an xbox controller.

>> No.6804270 [DELETED] 

>>6804267
>When all the dudes are jacked demigods clad in full plate
>implying that's not some sexualized beefcake landwhales fap to right there

>> No.6804277 [DELETED] 

>>6804270
we don't fap though. We're buffin the muffin, flickn the bean, squeezing the peach, Jocelyn Eldering, or even playing the clitar. But fap? no. not ever. Unless someone is wearing her strap on.

>> No.6804289 [DELETED] 

>>6804205
Some people are more genetically inclined to have higher metabolism or build muscle easier. But there's few disorders that make you fat no matter what. PCO or severe endocrine balance is the only thing that comes to mind.

That being said I know fat is unhealthy, but some of the commentary people get is just plain vicious.

>> No.6804300 [DELETED] 

>>6804269
This.

The worst part is that girls are often subjected to rude guy's perspective of what it means to be a nerd. If you didn't read the manga, you just watched the anime, or you didn't 100% a game and all it's DLC, if you listened to the booktape and didn't read the analog book, then you don't count and are an attention whore. This is what we put up with.

>> No.6804301 [DELETED] 

>>6804267
>It's degrading not because they're hot but because they're presented as sexualized pieces of meat. When all the dudes are jacked demigods clad in full plate and the one girl is wearing a fucking bikini and bending over for everyone, that's just masturbatory material, and it's fair to call it that no matter how the neckbeards complain that people aren't taking their 2deep and 2adult series/game/book seriously.

Whats wrong with being mastubatory material, and why does it automatically degrade you?

As for the way they are posed, well thats because men and women have different sexual triggers.
Women in general would not find those poses attractive,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-N9daqANcw

>> No.6804315 [DELETED] 

>>6804238

In my country I have to pay the health bills for chronic smokers and obese people.

>> No.6804331 [DELETED] 

How would you women react if you say an ugly fat neckbeard dressed as your husbando?

"hey another fan! I should go over and talk to him!"

Nah.

>> No.6804348 [DELETED] 
File: 559 KB, 400x276, 1366159220314.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804348

>>6804205
This is one of the finest examples of retardation within the human race I've seen in a while.

>comments "No source"
>proceeds to make a refutation simply claiming "modern research implies it's not"
>takes it even further when making an analogy based upon said refutation

You daft hypocrite.

>> No.6804353 [DELETED] 

>>6804331
I'm fat and ugly myself, we'd make the perfect couple.

I do love how /cgl/ gets all up in arms about fat people existing.

>> No.6804354 [DELETED] 

>>6804195
Yes, generally, it does seem to be that way.

>> No.6804372 [DELETED] 

It's less about "sexualisation" of characters in video games and anime for example, and more about an unequal distribution. IMHO as a cis, thin, white, femanon.

>> No.6804375 [DELETED] 

>>6804331
I don't have a husbando but if I saw a fat dude in a good costume Id take his photo.I don't see any problem with good craftsmenship.

>> No.6804380

>be 16
>first time going to a con
>buy a crappy bridget (guilty gear) cosplay off the coscom marketplace
>the whole con people shout stuff like "everyone's gay for bridget"
>someone asks to take a picture of me spanking them with a paddle
>get my tits groped by a guy wanting to see if i'm really a girl
>love all the attention

and that's how cosplayers are born

>> No.6804396 [DELETED] 

Dat comic, retarded fat girl feels entitled to look hot just cause she likes the character. Why does she think it's appropriate to go out dressed like that to a con, when it's not appropriate to dress like that anywhere?

>>6804240

That game is retarded, but the fact that so much attention went to the Sorceress and not the Amazon just proves how women will get butthurt over something that they'll never get to look like. No real woman wants to look like the Amazon, fuck her, she's ugly, but the Sorceress? Now she's a problem with those Hitomi Tanaka tits.

>> No.6804398 [DELETED] 

>>6804375
>bought XXXXL costume
>craftsmanship

>> No.6804399 [DELETED] 

>>6804301
>posting a video by 'girlwriteswhat', a known woman hater hypocrite who says bigotry and spreads hate to get viewers and subscriptions from MRA losers

I want /r9k/ to go out.

>> No.6804406 [DELETED] 

>>6804130
YES thank you!
if she was doing it just because of her love for the character she wouldn't care if some dumb fuck called her a whale

>> No.6804410 [DELETED] 

OP, please, quickly delete this thread. It's infected by bad people.

>> No.6804413 [DELETED] 
File: 68 KB, 500x716, 1367300844130 copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804413

>> No.6804418 [DELETED] 

>>6804410
>just like any other censorship group out there.

Stop trying to control discussions, however "racy" they may be.

>> No.6804423 [DELETED] 

>>6804406
But that's wrong. The fact that you like something doesn't make it feel less bad when people are cruel to you for (openly) liking that thing but not being as attractive as everyone would like.

>> No.6804425 [DELETED] 

>>6804423
it does if you don't care about the opinions of others.

>> No.6804428 [DELETED] 
File: 34 KB, 413x395, 1310483412100.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804428

>>6804413

>> No.6804431 [DELETED] 

>>6804301
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-N9daqANcw
Wow, this was obnoxious! I could only make it to 14 minutes before I had to turn this shit off. Not only can't this woman talk for herself (seriously she's reading off a script the entire fucking time and does those annoying little cuts to scroll down) but she makes such stupid and illogical comparisons too.
Who needs this bitch to sit around and compare irelevant statement like "well because things were like this 20,000~ years ago," as if it has any modern relevance to what happens today.

>> No.6804433 [DELETED] 

>>6804425
And not everyone has the power of "just not caring". That's also why people still go to the effort of trying to get into relationships and looking after their appearance.

>> No.6804437 [DELETED] 

>>6804431
This so much. Feminist sisters should send her a letter bomb, she deserves to die for betraying the female gender with her hate speech and lack of tolerance.

>> No.6804442 [DELETED] 

>>6804431
I hate how her premise is
>men like sexual objectification because thousands of years ago they wanted this for reproductive purposes
>so this is why they don't complain about it as much as women
Bull fucking shit. Men don't like unwanted sexual harassment from women just as much as women don't like unwanted sexual harassment from men.
And no, not all men like to be objectified. Why does she think so many men bitch about girls wanting the fittest guys and 10/10s? Oh right, because they be lovingggg dat wanted sexual objectification.

>> No.6804443 [DELETED] 
File: 19 KB, 360x264, look-at-all-the-fucks-i-dont-give-theyre-just-falling-from-the-sky.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804443

>>6804433
sucks to be them then
i look after my appearance so i can look good for my own sake as i like to look like what i think is attractive. if other people don't like it fuck em'

also i didn't realise a relationship was just having someone to give you compliments all the time. or do you mean people who look after their appearance so they can get into a relationship?

>> No.6804446 [DELETED] 

>>6804425
I hate this so much. Do people just forget that we're social animals and are essentially BUILT to care about what others think of us? It's a huge part of how we function and it's not something that can be dismissed so easily. Yes, some people will have an easier time ignoring stuff like rude comments and such, but you can't just assume everyone will be like that.

Negativity hurts no matter what your reasons for doing something is.

>> No.6804449 [DELETED] 

>>6804442
No, you misunderstand. She said that men likeD sexual objectification, because back then they had no reason to dislike it. If a fugly girl wanted to sleep with them, they could just fuck her if they wanted to do so and then fuck another. Nowadays they have to either marry the fugly one or go to prison for raping them.

>> No.6804460 [DELETED] 

>>6804449
>Nowadays they have to either marry the fugly one or go to prison for raping them.
>implying men like to fuck ugly women to begin with
You are hilarious.

>> No.6804462 [DELETED] 

>>6804443
so you don't give a shit about anything the persons you have relationships with think? that's nice.

>> No.6804473 [DELETED] 

>>6804460
Can != like.

You don't really know men if you think they wouldn't fuck an ugly chick from behind when they're bored, there are no consequences, and have no better options.

Ever heard about "bag it and tag it"? You're the one who's being hilarious.

>> No.6804475 [DELETED] 
File: 24 KB, 371x371, no-fat-chicks-de.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804475

>>6803928
1) Respect women.
2) Never sire children.

Also, fat chick wears the costume because she wants to seduce men and men rightly point out her body's gross. If she really cared she'd get into shape but she pretends it's a moral highground to demand men accept sickly women b/c she's lazy.

>> No.6804482 [DELETED] 

>>6804475
I thought it was to show she's a fan of the show, not to "seduce" anyone. Otherwise, the hot fit girl wouldn't have gotten mockery or insults either.

>> No.6804484 [DELETED] 

>>6804473
>tag it and bag it
But earlier you claimed they'd go to prison for willfully fucking an uggo unless they married them. Now you're saying men have a choice on the matter and that most women, even fuggos, won't hold them to a lease for it?

You're full of flip flops.

>> No.6804492 [DELETED] 

>>6804484
>You're full of flip flops.
No, you're full of desperation.

>they could just fuck her if they wanted to (=bag it and tag it)
>Nowadays they [can't without consequence]

You're either an tumblsrs troll or a Potato eater who cannot into English.

>> No.6804497 [DELETED] 
File: 15 KB, 368x300, wut.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804497

>>6804492
>Nowadays they [can't without consequence]
But they can, you just want desperately to believe there's serious consequences to sex everytime you have it when there isn't, and that people don't have the same biological stance towards sex today than they did thousands of years ago.

Wanna troll again?

>> No.6804502 [DELETED] 

>>6804492
>Nowadays they [can't without consequence]
>marriage
or
>prison

So you're telling me every time a man has sex with a person he faces marriage or prison? That makes no god damn sense lol.

>> No.6804509 [DELETED] 

>>6804502
>>6804497
>imp. a possibility == always
This is getting really pathetic, my friend. Lebbit is the other way.

>> No.6804529 [DELETED] 
File: 113 KB, 1319x428, 1367166957151.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804529

you go girl

>> No.6804541 [DELETED] 

>>6804315
And the terminally ill. What's your point? Maybe your system needs more preventative care, but that has nothing to do with this.

>> No.6804542 [DELETED] 
File: 709 KB, 627x719, 1366900761127.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804542

>> No.6804553 [DELETED] 

>>6804301
It's degrading because they're not making well-rounded characters or god forbid female characters that contribute to the story etc., but that so often in the media, women are simply eye candy to tag along with the male protagonist(s).

Masturbatory images are perfectly fine, but to see them proliferating media that's consumed by many and considered to be "normal" in games is just pathetic. Get your rocks off to something else, and keep the sexualized bullshit to porn. Some of us actually want good female characters, not just fap material.

>> No.6804569 [DELETED] 

>>6804315
wow oh no it's such a tragedy your taxes have to go to pay for things you don't want. i guess we should only pay taxes for things we like.

>> No.6804570 [DELETED] 

>>6804529
That bitch is so obviously going against the flow so she can be special.

>> No.6804572 [DELETED] 

>>6804553
You see, the problem here, my dumbfuck friend, is that
>they're not making well-rounded characters
and that's it.

Most male characters are just as worthless fanfic tier writing shit as most female characters.

Writing doesn't sell, or more importantly, the people who keep complaining about it don't actually bother paying for video games that break the stereotypes, since they're not actually interested in playing video games -- they just want to complain (ie. because they're making a living as a "pop culture critic" / retard who studied women's studies / a YouTube harlot).

Tell me an example of a game with well-written male characters and female characters that serve only as dumb eye candy.

I can actually think of an example to the contrary, but you wouldn't recognize it anyway, pleb.

>> No.6804573 [DELETED] 
File: 52 KB, 600x800, 603683_448317675256538_1328932509_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804573

>>6804570

she is sexy cosplayer
she is hero /cgl/ deserves
(is it a coincidence the ones who usually complain about sexualized characters are fat like the girl in OP?)

>> No.6804578 [DELETED] 

>>6804267
>It's degrading not because they're hot but because they're presented as sexualized pieces of meat

Never mind that the men in video games are also sexualize/idealised to extreme. Just cause the male equivalent isn't a metal bikini as well doesn't mean they aren't. How many guys do you see running around with massive muscles, abs that somehow penetrate through plate???

Video games are fantasy worlds. I wish people would stop trying to push their views and ways onto something it doesn't apply to.

>> No.6804581 [DELETED] 
File: 39 KB, 420x443, skylAr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804581

>>6804482
>the hot fit girl wouldn't have gotten mockery or insults either.

That part of the story was complete fiction.

irl
-if anyone's referring to the fatty as such they're giggling or whispering to a friend, avoiding her attention
-guys would shyly and awkwardly try to get pictures with or just stare at the hotty. None would cal. her slut.

The fatty is projecting her insecurities into onto other people. She literally has the hot chick think, "you're not good enough". The hot chick wouldn't even notice or pay attention to the fatty. She'd be busy promoting whatever product she's paid to or engaging with the many people who wanted to interact with her.

The fatty knows deep down that she should improve her body but values food too much and reproducing too little to do so. Instead she dissociates her own self-criticism and imagines it's coming from other people as a coping mechanism making it easier to reject the evaluation b/c she pretends it's external rather than internal.

>> No.6804596 [DELETED] 

>>6804578
Women are more sexualized than men. I understand the 'omg muscles ontop of muscles thing' but trust me, it isn't the same thing as women being presented as objects on shelves you can buy and grope.

>> No.6804602 [DELETED] 

>>6804553
>It's degrading because they're not making well-rounded characters or god forbid female characters that contribute to the story etc., but that so often in the media, women are simply eye candy to tag along with the male protagonist(s).

This doesn't really apply to Wonder Woman though.

>Get your rocks off to something else, and keep the sexualized bullshit to porn.

Sexuality is a big part of life and the media potrays this. you cannot divorce the two.
Sex isn't just what takes place in the bedroom its a big part of who we are and what we do every day.

Out of curiosity what do YOU get off to? i bet its not porn. I bet you love to sexualize movie, television or video game characters like most women.

So why arent you going around telling chicks to look at porn instead of sexualizing characters?

>> No.6804607 [DELETED] 

I had an interesting conversation with a friend earlier. She likened sexism in games to violence in games. Why is the first not okay while the second is?

>not a loaded question, i literally want opinions on this

>> No.6804608 [DELETED] 

>>6804572
>I can actually think of an example to the contrary, but you wouldn't recognize it anyway

Not quoted anon, but I'm curious now. Could you please post it?

>> No.6804612 [DELETED] 

>>6804596
To you maybe but a fair share of men would disagree. It's like if two people get a paper cut and 1 person says "NO. Mine hurts more than yours." Both male and female are sexualised, only difference is that female are more sensitive to it. Just like there are weak useless "eye candy" females, their are useless "eye candy" males. Just most people don't focus on the males.

>> No.6804613 [DELETED] 

>>6804608
The Syberia series. Male characters were mostly one dimensional, whilst the female protagonist was a round character.

>> No.6804610 [DELETED] 

>>6804509
You didn't say "possibility" broseph.
You said prison or marriage.
Don't blame others when you can't properly learn to communicate your ideas.

>> No.6804625 [DELETED] 

>>6804613
Ah, I've been meaning to cosplay Kate for so long now.

>> No.6804627 [DELETED] 

>>6804581
As someone who is really fat, a lot of it is total delusion. Like i will look down at my body and don't think i'm that massive, but if i see a photo of me which shows my whole body, it's fucking horrible and then reality hits, like fucking hell i am huge. A fatty does feel bad about themselves no matter how well they hide it or they simply block it all out completely.

It's hard to lose weight when you get to a certain size though and your self esteem is so low anyway that you don't feel worth it. Like i'm just going to be left with saggy skin and covered in stretch marks anyway, so why starve myself? (Because when you go back down to eating 2000 cals after eating way above that, you do feel hungry/sad etc)

However health is another matter and i am losing weight because i want to be healthy, despite what my body will look like under clothes (it can't be any worse right). Fatty's who say they are healthy are lying and deluded

>> No.6804628 [DELETED] 

>>6804610
No, the thing is, my female friend, that I didn't say either, but you chose to fill in (aka project) words that fit better with your views. Now better fill in that tumblr posting queue before it gets empty (good heavens no!).

>> No.6804639 [DELETED] 

>>6804628
>Nowadays they have to either marry the fugly one or go to prison for raping them.
>either marry the fugly one OR go to prison
>OR
>OR
Yeah, tell me more about my projections brah.

>> No.6804657 [DELETED] 

>>6804639
Here you go
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/or#English

>> No.6804662 [DELETED] 

>>6804541
>implying being terminally ill is something they chose to do

>> No.6804667 [DELETED] 

>>6804541
>>6804569
"What's your point"? You literally leech money of healthy people just by being unhealthy.

However, it seems most of us don't agree with it and the government will stop supporting smokers health costs with taxpayers money after next election. Obesity will most likely come soon after.

>> No.6804668 [DELETED] 
File: 112 KB, 400x400, 9869.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804668

>>6804657
Stay butthurt then, dumbshit.

>> No.6804669 [DELETED] 

sure is /r9k/ in here

sage for shitposting

>> No.6804671 [DELETED] 

>>6804668
>>6804669
More like lebbitumblr.
>implying I don't know there's just one person samefagging all the time

>> No.6804673 [DELETED] 

>>6804657
>http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/or#English
Yeah and you used an inclusive or and not an "either or" nor "exclusive or." You can get over yourself now.

>> No.6804675 [DELETED] 

>>6804667
Me? I don't cost YOU anything. I pay my own medical insurance and care. Maybe people are unhealthy because they don't have access to healthcare or live below the poverty line, as is the case for a huge majority of obese individuals.

And like hell the government would de-fund lung cancer treatment. Are you seriously insisting that politicians could win elections with a platform of discriminating against unhealthy people and smokers? Are you delusional? It's never going to happen, suck it up and pay your taxes.

>> No.6804678 [DELETED] 
File: 20 KB, 502x111, Screen Shot 2013-04-30 at 1.34.33 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804678

>>6804671
>ABLLOOOABLLOOO SAMEFAG TUMBLRLEDDIT SCUM QQ
>you don't realize more than one person thinks you're a retard

>> No.6804680 [DELETED] 
File: 55 KB, 800x450, 1337920297714.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804680

>>6804667
You in Norway?

>tfw most progressive country in the world doesn't agree with tumblr nazis

>> No.6804681 [DELETED] 

>>6804673
>"At the crossroad, you can turn left or right."
>implying that means you can't do anything else (turn around, stop...)

Most retarded troll of the 2k1s.

>> No.6804686 [DELETED] 

>>6804675
>>6804667
You two obviously doesn't live in the same country you retards.

>> No.6804691 [DELETED] 
File: 1.82 MB, 2000x2000, stfu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804691

>> No.6804692 [DELETED] 

>>6804678
Except I didn't imply that the two posts were the same. I was correcting the second person saying that it's not /r9k/ its tumblr while quoting the first to pointout he's the on doing the smaefagging. Here are all your posts:

>>6804668
>>6804639
>>6804610
>>6804570
>>6804502
>>6804497
>>6804484
>>6804460
>>6804442

How many have I missed, friend?

>> No.6804694 [DELETED] 
File: 35 KB, 500x374, umadder.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804694

>>6804627
It's good you're honest with yourself.

Some advice
1) Most heavy folks diet consists mostly of snack foods. They're hungry b/c they eat low-nutrion junk and they're fat cause it's full of fat, sugar, and salt. Take the time to cook meat and prepare solid meals. The process of cooking alone, smelling the food being prepared, makes you less hungry.

2) Exercise. Look up a park in your area and go for a walk once a day. Do push-ups, bicycle curls, cherry-picks, etc.

3) If you know anyone who exercises more enlist they're help. It's more fun and habit-forming as a social venture.

>> No.6804698 [DELETED] 

>>6804613
Thanks, I'll check it out

>> No.6804700 [DELETED] 
File: 33 KB, 410x396, 1300470442139.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804700

>>6804691
>he doesn't know the difference between being objectified and male power fantasies

>> No.6804704 [DELETED] 

>>6804700
>implying you know what all men/women think when they play video games.

>> No.6804705

As early as age 8 I helped my mom make my own Halloween costumes based off of games and shows I liked. In middle school, I would do "closet cosplays" of the kids from Digimon. My home ec. sewing project was the pants and top worn by Ruki/Rika from the third season.

I was kinda cosplaying before I even knew what cosplay was. I was introduced to actual cosplay via anime magazines in 9th grade.

>> No.6804712 [DELETED] 

>>6804700
>implying women don't use seduction and sexual prowess as a form of power.

After all, part of being a strong independent new-age feminist means using your sexuality to cater to men under the false pretense of "empowerment"

>> No.6804713 [DELETED] 
File: 149 KB, 520x466, 1301520185377.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804713

>>6804704
the point
ur head m8

>> No.6804717 [DELETED] 

>>6804130
>>6804406
Actually no, it doesn't work that way. At least until you become used that opinion being there and learning to just not give a fuck.

Former fatty here, and I've gotten a lot of flack for being fat and ugly cosplaying every neckbeard's wettest dream (despite making sure I picked versions that were modest and/or altering the design a bit to work better on me, no bikinis here, I stayed modest).

I did it out of love for the character and series. I did it to be a fellow nerd, to have fun with friends and have a good time. I have never been out to advertise myself or get attention. I don't fucking care because I do it for my own enjoyment.

When I first got the negative comments, it really fucking hurt and I wanted to quit. Then when I realized it's a bunch of sweaty neckbeards with orange dorito fingers typing away in their basement wishing they too could go out and have a good time. I realized, they aren't worth my time.

>> No.6804718 [DELETED] 

>>6804713
Some women are so bad about this I honestly wasn't sure lmao

>> No.6804719 [DELETED] 

>>6804692
>Except I didn't imply that the two posts were the same
Yet mysteriously those were the only two you quoted and crying about a samefag. Dunce.

>> No.6804721 [DELETED] 

>>6804681
>comparing a crossroad to a decision about sex
Top lel.

>> No.6804724 [DELETED] 

>>6804717
Just want to point out but it doesn't matter what size you are, gender or anything. People ALWAYS have negative comments and remarks. It's sad to say but it's human nature. (Hell cgl is a great example of it.)

>> No.6804729 [DELETED] 

>>6804719
It's not a mystery. If you weren't a moron, you'd instead point out that you cannot post two sage posts in the same minute. But since you're from a different website, and been posting on 4chan for ~few weeks tops (possibly only during Spring Break), you don't know such details about 4chan.

>> No.6804739 [DELETED] 

>>6804729
>hurpderp people can't post within the same minute hurr~
>implying butthurt faggots like you are still above calling samefag regardless
Oh yeah, totes.
>spring break faggot
>tumblr sjw
>lerebbit
>moron
Holy shit, is there one ad hominem you haven't called out yet?

>> No.6804741 [DELETED] 

>>6804724
Exactly, and this is why I don't care.

I lost at least 60lbs sofar and have a little more to go until my goal. But people are still going to call me fat and ugly, point out that my nose isn't right for the character. Oh yes, let me go through gene re-sequencing to appease you anon.

>> No.6804742 [DELETED] 
File: 156 KB, 560x461, fullretard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6804742

>>6804729
>capitalizes spring break

>> No.6804744 [DELETED] 

>>6804739
>is condescending from the start
>expecting to be treated seriously
Lul.

>> No.6804745 [DELETED] 

>>6804744
>I'll be condescending towards you because I feel I've been treated that way and to hell if it makes my points look worse

Yeah, typical tardbabby complaint.

>> No.6804748 [DELETED] 

>>6804627

This will probably come out as a joke but I read the sticky at /fit/ (which I missed and they kindly pointed it out...) and I've lost about 16kgs since early summer 2012. I'm super happy with my progress and I feel healthy and energetic these days. I sort of thought I did before.. which illustrates the problem. IF you follow a healthy lifestyle, chances are you're not going to stay overweight for long.

Here's what's really surprising though. I'm pretty uncomfortable with posting myself even on the internet. But still, I did post my progress expecting a collective "GTFO landwhale" from /fit/. I'd say a majority commended me for my progress and told me to keep up. "Good progress but your still fat".
Fucking hell, there's no better feeling.

>> No.6804755 [DELETED] 

>>6804744
>someone said I was full of flip flops
>BETTER CALL THEM DESPERATE AND THEN BITCH LATER ABOUT BEING CONDESCENDING
Yeah, I would've gotten pissy too if someone said I had a flip flop argument and resorted to personal attacks after that, totally bro.

>> No.6804753 [DELETED] 

>>6804745
What else should I do? It's only the two of us posting in this thread now anyway. There's no fun in tolerating morons.

>> No.6804758 [DELETED] 

>>6804748
>This will probably come out as a joke but I read the sticky at /fit/ (which I missed and they kindly pointed it out...) and I've lost about 16kgs since early summer 2012

>Read the sticky
>lost weight

Yeah... no.
If you are losing weight on SS+GOMAD you are doing it wrong.

>> No.6804763 [DELETED] 

>>6804753
>It's only the two of us posting in this thread now anyway.
Not really? I don't know who these
>>6804748
>>6804758
>>6804742
>>6804755
are.

>> No.6804764 [DELETED] 

>>6804758

A fellow /fit/izen I see.

>>6804748

Don't mind him. It's just a troll meme.

>> No.6804773 [DELETED] 

>>6804748
Just don't post pictures of yourself on 4chan. Keep it to Facebook and Tumblr (untagged). That's the best way to deal with it. You have to think of what the people looking at said picture are going to say. If they're going to be asshats and you know it's going to ruin your day, don't do it. Don't put yourself out there and especially in the wrong places if you don't want to feel miserable.

>> No.6804774 [DELETED] 

>>6804763
>quoting half of his own post
>doesn't know who they are

>> No.6804780 [DELETED] 

>>6804694
Thanks for the advice :)

>> No.6804786

Okay, ignoring lebbit-chan, now back on topic:

>How did you get your start?
My friends made me do it. They wanted me to cosplay a character they thought I looked like.
>Who introduced you to the scene?
See above.

>> No.6804796

>>6803928
A cousin I used to stay over with when my parents fought liked all the classic anime series (Sailor Moon, Ranma ½, DB, DBZ, Saint Seya, etc) and she had them all recorded on VCR tapes.

The nights I'd stay over to sleep, she'd let me watch them so I grew up with the idea that I liked anime.

During middle school, this place called Animate! opened up near my house where a bunch of kids from that neighborhood would gather on weekends and watch an anime series. Mom pointed it out, and since the crowd that gathered there seemed harmless enough, that's one of the few places they'd let me go to on my own (I was a sheltered kid in a violent city).

This place which had a horrible business model helped many of these people establish a community of like-minded individuals who would then go on to create the city's otaku scene, which included cons.

The people I met at that place got me into cons, and I was fascinated by the idea of cosplaying since the moment I knew of it.

I didn't try until I discovered /cgl/ because I'm a neurotic perfectionist and I wouldn't be able to stand looking like one of those people in the "Worst cosplays ever" videos.

>> No.6804802 [DELETED] 

>>6804773
That's the thing though. I thought I was making a mistake but it totally turned into a positive experience. I don't like to credit /fit/ but they did play a role in changing my lifestyle. I'm not sure I'd be able to get going with the usual "honey you don't have to change for anyone" that I kept getting on FB.

This is not me saying "post yourself on /fit/" by the way. I realise that YMMV

>> No.6804812 [DELETED] 

>>6804774
Being this buttraged.
>not just ignoring lebbitchan
Girl detected

>> No.6804815 [DELETED] 

>>6804812
But I never said I wasn't a girl, you idiot. I implied that pretty much in my first post ITT.

>> No.6804821 [DELETED] 

>>6804815
>buttraged girl confirmed
Explains your attitude and why you need to have the last word.

>> No.6804843 [DELETED] 

>>6804205
obese retard alert

>> No.6804863 [DELETED] 

>>6804205
sure we do its called overeating and being fucking lazy, i could 3000 calories a day for a year whilst exercising and i wouldn't get fat or experience a multitude of health problems however if i ate the calories and sat around on my ass i'd balloon and be fat

>> No.6804869 [DELETED] 

>>6804205
>Modern research implies that it is a genetic disorder people are born with

But that's only applicable to about 4% of obese people overall most of it is poor diet and lack of exercise.

>> No.6804904 [DELETED] 

>>6804863
>seriously believing the majority of fatties eat over 2000 calories daily
Haha no. If someone ate 3000 calories a day without exercise then they would be gaining close to five pounds a week.
As everyone knows, most weight gain is slow and creeping.
It's more like they have a few days of the week where they eat well and then have a few bad days where they eat junk and don't exercise adequately to make up for the weight gain. Which translates to anywhere between half a pound to a pound per week in weight gain.
So over the course of two months, a person could gain 8-10 pounds and not necessarily realize that they've put on the weight if they haven't been exercising right and had a few too many 'cheat' days.

The reason why we have this obesity problem is that so many people shove this opinion of 'laziness' down everyone's throats when the reality is it's a progressive disease that can be exacerbated by a few tiny mistakes over a long period of time.

>> No.6804913 [DELETED] 

>>6804904
>Haha no. If someone ate 3000 calories a day without exercise then they would be gaining close to five pounds a week

You start gaining less fat though once you hit a certain weight cause your body starts needing more energy in order to function.

>> No.6804916 [DELETED] 

>>6804904
>If someone ate 3000 calories a day without exercise then they would be gaining close to five pounds a week.

No...

Where are you getting all of this 'information' from? First off calories are not a blanket term. The types of things you are eating, carbs, sugars, fats etc. are what affects weight gain, not just calories. I personally eat atleast 3000 calories a day and don't exercise, but that's because I don't gain any weight because I have a condition. Though my cholesterol and blood pressure can get high if I eat poorly.

>> No.6804925 [DELETED] 

>>6804916
>The types of things you are eating, carbs, sugars, fats etc. are what affects weight gain, not just calories.
Wrong. Carbs and protein have 4 calories per gram, while fats have 9.
What constitutes the total number of calories you consume might affect your general health, but the actual increase or decrease in weight is entirely dependent on how much energy your body's storing and this is dependent on how much you're eating.

>> No.6804926 [DELETED] 

>>6804913
>You start gaining less fat though once you hit a certain weight cause your body starts needing more energy in order to function.
Where'd you get this broscience?
You only start gaining less if you're expending energy. So if some obese person is sitting on the couch daily and has an office job, and is eating 3000 calories, they will be gaining weight.
Their body's metabolism doesn't have a magic button.

>>6804916
Yes.
If you are eating over 1000 calories a day above your BMR (and most obese people top off around 1800), you are at risk for putting on weight because that's more energy than your body can burn off without exercise.

The reason you'll get fat from eating five doughnuts and not five carrots doesn't have to do with just the calories yes, but do you realize how many carrots you'd have to eat to get the caloric equivalent of five doughnuts? More than you could stomach. So it's moot.
>I have a condition
And what is that may I ask? Because eating 3000 calories a day is no joke.

>> No.6804931 [DELETED] 

>>6804926
You do know it takes a lot more to effort for a fat person to do simple everyday task, right? Even while sitting on the coach their body is working insanely harder to keep them alive hence using more energy. Granted they will still gain weight but a LOT more slowly than 8 pounds a week.

>> No.6804935 [DELETED] 

>>6804926
I have hypoglycemia as well as a genetically high metabolism so I basically have to eat 4 pretty large meals and snacks throughout the day within 5 hours or so of eachother or I run the risk of passing out due to low blood sugar.

And what I meant was that certain metabolisms handle certain types of foods such as carbs differently than others, so while yes carbs have more calories, I can eat unlimited carbs and nothing happens, while someone may only be able to eat a little bit and they gain weight, it's not just the calories overall that affect your health it's how your body reacts to certain types of foods.

>> No.6804942 [DELETED] 

>>6804916
>I don't gain any weight because I have a condition

If that is being tall I can see the dealio. No retard would ever spread disease acceptance based on the 1%.

>> No.6804950 [DELETED] 

>>6804931
>You do know it takes a lot more to effort for a fat person to do simple everyday task, right?
I know, and there's a perfectly logical explanation for why they do that: Their body is working against them to save as much energy as possible. Because for the super obese, even simple tasks like walking 100 meters or going up a flight of stairs is a workout.

Now sitting doesn't count.
Nor does breathing.
The amount of energy your body burns at rest is calculated into someone's BMR (basal metabolic rate).
So for example if I'm 5'3 and 200 my BMR (or the calories I burn at rest) is 1722.
Whereas if I was 120 it is 1374.
And this is because for reasons that you've stated.

Still, if I burn 1722 calories from sitting alone, and I need a diet reduction between 1200-1500 calories a day to lose around a pound a week, then eating 3000 calories is over 1000 calories more than my body can burn alone without exercise. And there are 3500 calories in one pound of fat. So in three days I would have gained a pound. And in a week I could gain two.

>> No.6804959 [DELETED] 

>>6804935
I have hypoglycema and I'm calling bullshit.

>> No.6804966 [DELETED] 

>>6804959
There's various degrees to hypoglycemia, bro.
The moment he said that he couldn't gain weight because of a condition, I though he was either diabetic or hypoglycemic.

>> No.6804969 [DELETED] 

>>6804935
>I can eat unlimited carbs and nothing happens, while someone may only be able to eat a little bit and they gain weight, it's not just the calories overall that affect your health it's how your body reacts to certain types of foods.

I understand that completely.
And heck I don't deny that someone can be overweight or borderline obese and be in decent shape because they eat relatively good food and just don't exercise as much as they should.

It's just that when you talk about the obesity issue as a whole, the nitty gritty about it is that people just take in too much calories and don't expend the necessary energy.

>> No.6804984 [DELETED] 

>I can eat unlimited carbs and nothing happens

>proving a point by making up some fantasy exception

>> No.6804988 [DELETED] 

>>6804462
when did i ever imply that?
i just hope the person i am in a relationship with loves me for who i am as a person not just my looks

>> No.6805014 [DELETED] 

>>6804988
Anyone who says looks aren't at least a SMALL part of it are either lying, have a fetish for fatties, or a fucking saint, the latter being a rare case. I don't mind my girlfriend getting a bit chubby, but if it reaches the point where it's not only unhealthy for her but disgusting for em to look at, there's only so much I can take.

>> No.6805018 [DELETED] 

>>6804950
So I guess my point with this is that if a 5'3 200 person gains 10-20 pounds a year gradually, they haven't been eating 3000 calories per day consistently, because if they were then they would've had a weight gain more like 50 pounds or higher. Unless they have some super rare metabolic condition.
But for the most part weight gain is gradual and most people don't notice. You could be 180 one year and then two years later find yourself at 200 because you gained 10 pounds a year.
It's not because people slam down twinkies and never think about their nutrition.

>> No.6805023 [DELETED] 

>>6805014
I sort of agree. Looks is one thing. But if you look like a junkie or anything else that can indicate very unhealthy habits, it puts you off. I'd have no problem with having a fat partner in a perfect world. However, I don't believe being overweight is healthy so I don't find it attractive.

>> No.6805027 [DELETED] 

>>6805023
>However, I don't believe being overweight is healthy so I don't find it attractive.
Honestly I think you should just do a background check before you go out with someone if health is this much of a concern. Find out their eating habits etc, because a thinner person can have fuck all wrong with them like HIV or type 1 diabeetus or some shit and well, they ain't healthy just because they're thin.
Would also help to find out if they're mental or not, like if they've got bipolar or depression because suicide and brooding ain't kawaii either.

>> No.6805028 [DELETED] 

>>6804959
Did you fail to see the part where I said I had a high metabolism as well? Normally people with hypoglycemia have a relatively high metabolism because of the hypoglycemia, but it runs in my family apart from it so it's doubled basically. And this was a diet instruction by my doctor, so I'm not just eating a bunch for the hell of it.

>> No.6805043 [DELETED] 

>>6804984
It's not a fantasy exception, do you know what hypoglycemia is?

>> No.6805053 [DELETED] 
File: 336 KB, 200x200, 1367230810923.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805053

>>6805027
We're arguing over attraction here. Welcome.
If someone shows obvious signs of anorexia or obesity, it's statistically rather safe to assume that they have disorders or a lack of self-discipline.

I wouldn't start kissing a guy with giant mouth sores.

>> No.6805055 [DELETED] 

>>6805043
I have hypoglycemia, apparently do to my past anorexia

>> No.6805057 [DELETED] 

>>6805028
You're basically the norm, whatever

>> No.6805058 [DELETED] 

>>6805055
*due

>> No.6805061 [DELETED] 
File: 521 KB, 250x179, KbsCl.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805061

>>6805053
>We're arguing over attraction here. Welcome.
But you're saying attractiveness=health
And I'm saying but health isn't always that transparent. There's nothing illogical about what I said because it's true.
I don't understand why you can't just admit you don't like the looks of fatties or anorexics when it is about their looks, and not the concern about their health.
I mean you already said it's a principle about "self-discipline" so obviously you care more about the principle than the concept of "health."

>> No.6805065 [DELETED] 

>>6805053
>I wouldn't start kissing a guy with giant mouth sores.
>because all mouth sores are contagious and must be herps
It's okay to admit you're judgmental. It's human, it's just there isn't much justifying it since it is about vanity.

>> No.6805078 [DELETED] 

>>6805065
Uh...not that anon, but all cold sores are a type of herpes and are contagious. Not all are the STD kind though, but they still are all herpes. You should actually learn things before you talk out your ass.

>> No.6805087 [DELETED] 

>>6805061
If being anorexic is a health issue what makes you think being obese isn't?

This is the problem with "fat acceptance" it doesn't discriminate between people who are fat because they are lazy slobs and those who are fat because they have a problem which makes them fat. It also teaches people that obesity causes little to no health issues, which just isn't true, there are tons of health issues linked to only obesity and weight problems that only happen when the person is overweight.

I personally think that people have become so worried about not judging peoples' exteriors that they are forgetting that there are real problems that go along with aspects of it.

>> No.6805115 [DELETED] 

>>6805061
>>6805065

>But you're saying attractiveness=health

I'm saying that physical attraction is very
rational. Not that it is supreme and above everything else.

>And I'm saying but health isn't always that transparent. There's nothing illogical about what I said because it's true.
I don't understand why you can't just admit you don't like the looks of fatties or anorexics when it is about their looks, and not the concern about their health.

Here's the kicker though. What do you think simple, biological physical attraction is? It is natural selection. In my case as a straight female. To find the strongest, suitable partner for you and a father for your future children. I realise that there are of course exceptions to indicators. But if I were to choose between two men- simply based on physical indicators of health, I will obviously pick the man with statistically better odds of providing me with what I need. There's nothing weird or unnatural about it.

>> No.6805118 [DELETED] 

>>6805014
but as i stated before i put effort into my looks and to me i find myself attractive so hopefully my partner does too.
it's just nt the be all and end all/ y'all put too much emphasis on what others think of you
>inb4 narcissist

>> No.6805124 [DELETED] 
File: 772 KB, 500x281, 14395896.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805124

>>6805061
>>6805065

>But you're saying attractiveness=health

I'm saying that physical attraction is very
rational. Not that it is supreme and above everything else.

>And I'm saying but health isn't always that transparent. >There's nothing illogical about what I said because it's true. >I don't understand why you can't just admit you don't like the looks of fatties or anorexics when it is about their looks, and not the concern about their health.

Here's the kicker though. What do you think simple, biological physical attraction is? It is natural selection. In my case as a straight female. To find the strongest, suitable partner for you and a father for your future children. I realise that there are of course exceptions to indicators. But if I were to choose between two men- simply based on physical indicators of health, I will obviously pick the man with statistically better odds of providing me with what I need. There's nothing weird or unnatural about it.

>> No.6805126 [DELETED] 

>>6805124
Fucking hell. Don't mind the greentext.

>> No.6805127 [DELETED] 

>>6805118
oops sorry i forgot this was /cgl/

>> No.6805137 [DELETED] 
File: 1.06 MB, 746x1079, anger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805137

>dressing as a character that does not share your body type
>dressing as a character known for their sex appeal, for better or worse
>shocked when people don't like it/assume you're flaunting
For that matter,
>believing you have to dress up as said character to prove you're a fan
How about just fucking talking to people, christ.
That comic has so many fallacies it physically hurts.
>"but why the hell do we have to prove ourselves to anyone?"
YOU FUCKING DON'T. WHY DO YOU THINK YOU HAVE TO?
CHRIST.

>> No.6805153 [DELETED] 

>>6804691
Exactly my thinking, men are as much idealized in videogames as women are. Both are but only fantasies.
One of the few cases where it's not true is in some japanese VN where the boys are usually plain and the ladies bonerific. But, seeing the theme of those games and their target audience, it's quite understandable.

>> No.6805171
File: 2.40 MB, 200x164, 1364178380459.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805171

>>6803992
>2009
>13
Ehehehe.


I dunno, I've always felt it would be cool to "be" a character for someone else. Like, make them go "holy shit that guy really looks like Sportacus" or whatever

(also, everyone arguing about body image instead of talking about their cosplay origins)

>> No.6805195 [DELETED] 
File: 78 KB, 800x800, 1367112173687.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805195

>>6804205
>And we don't actually know what causes fatness.
Must be breathing air. You know, the balloon effect.

>> No.6805209
File: 32 KB, 174x184, 4324324.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805209

Started cosplaying to bang hot cosplay girls

It worked

>> No.6805222 [DELETED] 
File: 234 KB, 480x640, 1240963522221.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805222

Just because a fat chick wears a revealing costume does NOT mean you can be judgmental!

>> No.6805229 [DELETED] 

I REALLY don't like fat people.
They make me physically depressed

>> No.6805233 [DELETED] 

Okay, before I start, let me get it out of the way that I am a heterosexual male. I'm not white, but my privilege should be high enough that this post can be auto-bombed by the CIS-police.

Now, why is it that people who are "fat" or obese constantly complain about people making fun of them and being shamed when they are fully aware that being overtly overweight is not an attractive trait to most people. Yes, it's mean to call someone a whale, but when I'm clearly pointing out the fact that you have poor body image why does it suddenly become my fault that you weigh as much as you do?

Now, I'm not sure what argument OP's picture was trying to make. If the argument is that you will be laughed at for trying to portray a character when you're ill-prepared in a physical sense, then it is true. If it's that some people will mindlessly brand you as someone who has no emotional or knowledgeable connection to some work if it appears as though you're only goal is to garner attention, this is also true. If it's that I should suddenly come to adore someone who is not appealing to me after wearing a costume in a really fat body then I just can't do that.

>> No.6805237 [DELETED] 

>>6804300
>If you didn't read the manga, you just watched the anime

Why wouldn't you read the manga if you liked the anime?

>> No.6805240 [DELETED] 

>>6805233
I haven't read you post but I'm going to advise you to check your privilege.

>> No.6805245 [DELETED] 

>>6805233

The comic in OP's picture was a final project a girl did for school. She was trying to portray the way women are treated in the nerd/geek culture. It didn't really have so much to do with fat people, etc. Just how women are treated like they're only pretending to like stuff for attention or how they are unrealistically portrayed in comic books.

idk something like that

>> No.6805248 [DELETED] 

>>6804399

Explain how she is a hypocrite.

>> No.6805252 [DELETED] 

>>6804269
i'm happy to be average in weight and a 7/10. i'm not so hot that i get called a "fakegeekgirldoinitforattention" but i also don't get called a gross whale. feels good man.

>> No.6805256 [DELETED] 

>>6804570

She's far from the only one. Most of the journalists complaining about Dragon's Crown are men.

>> No.6805258 [DELETED] 

This whole thread is ridiculous. Everyone seems to have the impression that it's only men who decide beauty standards when women contribute just as much to them if not more. For the most part men just sort of follow standards like sheep though obviously some of them have their own standards that don't really change based on others.

I just hear this strange sort of hypocritical argument that men are the ones making women want to look like sex objects, dress in revealing clothing, wear make up and try to please them, but the same people argue that we only do these things for ourselves because we want to look sexy or hot or attractive for us.

And at the same time it is women who are getting disgusted at fat girls or ugly girls or girls without makeup and pretty girls and girls who "dress to impress".

As far as I'm concerned the new-age feminist movement is perpetuating a lot of it's own problems by focusing on issues that are more directly related to personal self esteem while blaming men, misogyny, society and media and at the same time turning a blind eye to the fact that women do infact create a lot of these problems from our own insecurities, short comings and ideals.

I just wanted to address that.

>> No.6805261 [DELETED] 
File: 130 KB, 592x736, 1366355797027.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805261

>>6805245
I really didn't understand what the point of the comic was. If it was that women are treated unfairly in a culture dominated mainly by adult males then, yeah, message received. All I really got from her is that she is overweight and got made fun of for cosplaying a healthy, fit, character and that I should feel bad about it.

>> No.6805264 [DELETED] 

>>6805261

Yeah, she focused a bit too much on the fat cosplay aspect thing. That part was supposed to represent how women are portrayed unrealistically. She should have found another way to convey that instead of just 'omg i'm fat, that makes them unrealistic'.

>> No.6805273 [DELETED] 

>>6805256
Where were the complaints when Vanillaware released Muramasa? Plenty of busty characters in that game, promotional art with a lot of blatant "sexualization", and even several occasions where the heroine was mostly nude.

Can't say much about Odin Sphere or Grand Knight's, but there you go. This is bullshit.

>> No.6805282 [DELETED] 

What bothers me most about all this is that people seem to forget target audiences. Comics, games, shows and whatever are all supposed to be fantasy, sure maybe they're geared towards men with really attractive sexualized unrealistic women, but they were designed for men.

This shit pisses me off the same way that people getting offended over moe anime pisses me off. It's not real life, it's just a fantasy, stop trying to apply real life things to it.

>> No.6805286 [DELETED] 
File: 692 KB, 1387x2917, necromancers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805286

>>6805273

Here's something interesting.

>> No.6805288 [DELETED] 

>>6805245
>She was trying to portray the way women are treated in the nerd/geek culture.

I have never seen anyone shouted at like that at a con.

>> No.6805296 [DELETED] 

>>6805286
Hmm. Now if Kamitani was following this line of logic throughout the creative process of developing the looks of these characters then he's suddenly become very meta in terms of character creation. While I think he simply took silhouette identification to a new eye-catching level, this is a nice way of looking at it.

>> No.6805300 [DELETED] 

>>6805288
That's because it only happens on places like 4chan.

>> No.6805317 [DELETED] 

>>6805288
because drawing internet discussions would make a boring comic

>> No.6805321 [DELETED] 

>>6805233
I just finished checking your privilege, and I have to inform you that yes, it is indeed there. Thank you for your patience.

>> No.6805322 [DELETED] 

>>6805288
They want to be oppressed. Its something for them to blame all their failings and short comings.

I wonder if these people existed in the 80's when the threat of nuclear annihilation pervaded peoples minds.

>> No.6805332 [DELETED] 

>>6805248
Because she's a bigot and a hypocrite who only says those things because she wants the views from MRA fedora wearing man babbys. She doesn't actually agree with it (no intelligent person would say such hate speech), she only does it for views.

I really hope they will pass the laws that suggested making criticizing feminism and women a criminal offense.

>> No.6805341 [DELETED] 

>>6805332
>I really hope they will pass the laws that suggested making criticizing feminism and women a criminal offense.

This sort of logic is what makes people like you seem like utter idiots. If the only way you can prove your point is shutting out all objection then you've lost the right to prove anything other than the fact that you cannot take criticism.

>> No.6805349 [DELETED] 

>>6805332
Thing is about gender politics, its that it turns people into monsters.

Feminists see oppression in everyone and so do the MRA's.

Everyone is wrong and no one is right.

>> No.6805350 [DELETED] 

>>6805233
>CIS-police
I know that the background is blue here too, but this is actually 4chan's /cgl/, not Tumblr.

>> No.6805352 [DELETED] 

>>6805332
Ah, a troll OK.

7/10, you really had me going.

>> No.6805353 [DELETED] 

>>6805341
Criticizing feminism / misogyny is the same level of evil as denying holocaust happened (that is also against the law in first world countries).

>> No.6805361 [DELETED] 

>>6805349
You're dumb.

>>6805352
It's not trolling. See my post above. You have to ensure that the progress made by feminism will stay and cannot be reverted. This is the safest way to do it.

>> No.6805366 [DELETED] 

>>6805233
>constantly complain about people making fun of them and being shamed when they are fully aware that being overtly overweight is not an attractive trait to most people.
Most don't. Where do you pull these figures from? Online? Who cares what's online if it doesn't really happen irl? Ever notice there's a lot more bullshit to be found online than irl? There's a reason for that.

Also there's a difference between accepting that someone doesn't want to date you and then being heckled mercilessly by mean spirited people who won't leave you the fuck alone. Which for a fact does happen to people with weight problems both overweight and underweight. So forgive some of them if they develop a victim complex after being bullied all of their lives and start to confuse it with rejection.

>If it's that I should suddenly come to adore someone who is not appealing to me after wearing a costume in a really fat body then I just can't do that.
And how do you jump to this? Nobody is asking you to come and gush over them, really. You're not that important to them I'm sure. They just want to be treated like human beings and not be pointed and laughed at like animals at the zoo for just wanting to dress as a character they like.

Seriously, what is wrong with some of you?
Oh and check your privilege.

>> No.6805368 [DELETED] 

>>6805361
You're dumb. Ur bad. Thats bad.

>> No.6805371 [DELETED] 

>>6805353
You clearly must be trolling. Plus if you think that new-age feminism hasn't become enough of a joke simply due to the idiotic choices feminist groups have made then you are indeed too far gone.

New age feminist groups are making no progress and infact overturning progress that has been made throughout the years.

>> No.6805372 [DELETED] 

>>6805368
Typical males and their "rational" arguments using "logic".

>> No.6805375 [DELETED] 

>>6805366
This doesn't actually happen in real life though. You need to calm down.

>> No.6805377 [DELETED] 

>>6805353
>>6805361

I'm a regular feminist and I would like to state my divergence from this nazi. Who is most likely a troll. Very likely a troll.

>> No.6805378 [DELETED] 

>>6805353
I'd put it more into the spectrum of criticizing feminism/misogyny being the same as criticizing zionism/Israel.
They might tell you that you're no better than a holocaust denier, just like a feminist will tell you you're no better than someone who rapes women, but hey! They're a bunch of morons and are only saying that because they dislike the fact you don't have the same opinions as them.

>> No.6805379 [DELETED] 

>>6805375
>This doesn't actually happen in real life though.
>this
Are you seriously denying that fatties aren't laughed at and called names irl...are you fucking serious right now.
Even underweight people get called names and get sneers.

>> No.6805380 [DELETED] 

>>6805371
>no progress
>recently passing laws that prevented abusive husbands / men from beating their wives / girlfriends
>making the gender pay gap smaller, bit by bit
>fighting for the right of gays and lesbians
>fighting against the outdated concept of the Church of Christ
>constant fighting for the rights of women to do what they want with their bodies and not be held hostage by parasitic cells because of patriarchal societal norms
>helping & supporting rape victims & fighting against male dominated judges who keep trying to downplay rape & police that doesn't take rape accusations seriously

Yeah... no progress...

>> No.6805382 [DELETED] 

>>6805377
No, you're probably a /r9k/ fedora wearer who doesn't know nothing about feminism.

>>6805378
>I'd put it more into the spectrum of criticizing feminism/misogyny being the same as criticizing zionism/Israel.
Thanks for proving that people who hate feminism == people who hate Jews == Holocaust deniers; thereby proving my original point that critique of feminism / hate speech against women should be outlawed.

>> No.6805383 [DELETED] 

>>6805372
Actually I'm a strong independent womyn that needs feminism to dictate my self worth. I feel quite pathetic without the constant validation.

>> No.6805386 [DELETED] 

>>6805380
First off, not all of these things have to do with feminism. Second off, I'm sure you're one of those idiots who believes that 'rape culture' is a thing, so your point is invalid.

>> No.6805390 [DELETED] 

>>6805380
>>making the gender pay gap smaller, bit by bit

Been disproven a billion times.

>> No.6805392 [DELETED] 

>>6805379

If you went to a con you wouldn't have people shouting abuse at you like in the OP

They might say it amongst themselves, but thats different.

>> No.6805394 [DELETED] 
File: 13 KB, 528x318, mugen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805394

>>6805322
>They want to be oppressed

>> No.6805398 [DELETED] 

>>6805390
By sources that are about as legitimate as Fox News / dailymail.

>>6805386
>Second off, I'm sure you're one of those idiots who believes that 'rape culture' is a thing, so your point is invalid.
>actually daring to deny that
You're a worthless peice of shit and I hope you will die of testicle cancer. At least I know that you will never procreate, being a disgusting virgin and all that. I can see your neckbeard from over here.

>> No.6805400 [DELETED] 

>>6805394
>I've never been on tumblr

FIFY

>> No.6805401 [DELETED] 

>>6805380
>Battery was already illegal
>Feminism =/= LGBTQ+ Rights
>Gender Gap = Myth
>You're intruding on other's rights with religion
>There's pro-life Feminists so
>Feminist lobbyists are the reason men can't get raped by women by definition in US, or at all in UK

>> No.6805403 [DELETED] 
File: 1.33 MB, 1864x1940, 1356975890127.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805403

this thread is funny

>> No.6805415 [DELETED] 

>>6805398
Give me one example of why rape culture is an actually thing? One.

I don't deny that police and judges don't take rape seriously in some cases, but it is the same with tons of other things.

And before you site some news shit about how those people who raped that girl in ohio were 'successful young boys with a bright future' the boston bombers were also 'successful young boys with a bright future' You just pick out things that apply to what you need them to and ignore the same kinds of things that would make your point invalid.

>> No.6805417 [DELETED] 

>>6805401
>>Battery was already illegal
But the laws as they were written were useless in helping protecting the women who suffered.
>>Feminism =/= LGBTQ+ Rights
They wouldn't happen without our support though.
>Gender Gap = Myth
Your 'manhood' = Myth.
>You're intruding on other's rights with religion
So what? If the religion is misogynistic (like Islam and Christianity) then it should get taken down.
>There's pro-life Feminists so
There's stupid people in every movement.
>Feminist lobbyists are the reason men can't get raped by women by definition in US, or at all in UK
No one ever said they can't get raped, but the only ones who make the rape are men, so they're raped by other men and all this comes from our society's support of rape culture, the thing you laugh at.

>> No.6805421 [DELETED] 

>>6805415
By that dumb 'logic' you would deny anything I could say. Typical manbabby arguing:
>prove it
>but don't use any way possible to prove it, HAH!

>> No.6805426 [DELETED] 
File: 160 KB, 717x585, 1359419259132.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805426

>>6805417

I honestly can't tell if you're being serious or not

>> No.6805428 [DELETED] 

>>6805417
>No one ever said they can't get raped, but the only ones who make the rape are men, so they're raped by other men and all this comes from our society's support of rape culture, the thing you laugh at.


WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU PEOPLE FEEDING THIS TROLL?

I tip my hat off to you, I really do.

>> No.6805429 [DELETED] 

Well, this thread just took a turn for the retarded.

>> No.6805430 [DELETED] 

>>6805421
I'm not a man, I'm an old school feminist/egalitarian and I hate idiots like you trying to turn society into some ass backwards overly sexualized man-hating hell hole.

>> No.6805436 [DELETED] 

>>6805428
I hope to god this is a troll or else we're in big trouble.

>> No.6805437 [DELETED] 

>>6805426
>>6805428
I don't want to believe someone would seriously hate women as much as you do by saying rape culture doesn't exist, but alas, it seem like you insist on being misogynistic shits.

>>6805429
It's what happens when /r9k/ goes on /cgl/ every time.

>> No.6805442 [DELETED] 

>>6805437
Well more like misandrists and misogynists but

>okay.jpg

>> No.6805443 [DELETED] 

>>6805437
Everyone is talking about you though.

>> No.6805450 [DELETED] 

>>6805442
There is no 'misandry'. The very concept behind that word is 'misogynistic', because it implies that women becoming more equal to men somehow hurts the rights of men, when it in reality only takes away their precious privilege.

>> No.6805453 [DELETED] 
File: 51 KB, 201x196, 1366634807541.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805453

>>6805450
Is this real life?

>> No.6805464 [DELETED] 

>>6805453
Read it and weep.
http://ted.coe.wayne.edu/ele3600/mcintosh.html

>> No.6805461 [DELETED] 

>>6805450
>>6805450
>>6805450
>>6805450
But...weren't you the one commenting about that women who is...bumbum! misandrist?

>> No.6805465 [DELETED] 

>>6805450
ALL WOMEN ARE WYMYNS AND ALL MEN ARE EVIL NECKBEARDS!111

ARISE TUMBLR, ARISE!

>> No.6805470 [DELETED] 

>>6805461
I don't think you understand what you're trying to say.
>>6805465
>strawman

>> No.6805474 [DELETED] 
File: 1.30 MB, 320x170, 1361239269355.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805474

>>6805450
>There is no 'misandry'. The very concept behind that word is 'misogynistic',

>> No.6805478 [DELETED] 

>>6805450
First off, modern feminists don't desire to be equal to men, they have expressed this various times through their actions, second off what?

>> No.6805482 [DELETED] 

>>6805470
>strawman

Now I know you're a troll.

>> No.6805486 [DELETED] 

>>6805470
>I don't think you understand what you're trying to say.

Do you know what misandry is?

>> No.6805495 [DELETED] 

>>6805450
You're the same kind of idiot who thinks that white people cannot be oppressed by black people, or that "reverse racism"(which isn't even a term by the way) doesn't actually exist. You probably think that fat people are oppressed, don't you?

Hahaha!

>> No.6805496 [DELETED] 

>>6805478
So what? Those are just dreams of the future. And it wouldn't be a bad future if women were the ones who lead the world...
cracked.com/blog/5-reasons-women-will-rule-future/

I can already see how the man babbies will start quoting the website name and imply that all my arguments are invalid because I linked an article from there.

I'm using it only because it has good arguments for why women should rule the world. And no, saying that doesn't make me an insane power hungry 'slut'. Currently, men ARE ruling the world. Why is it so outrageous to just dream of a better future?

>> No.6805510 [DELETED] 

>>6805495
>You're the same kind of idiot
Except that kind of person isn't an idiot. It's the dominant, leading group that causes the oppression. It's like saying that when a slave rises up against his slave master, he's oppressing him. Or like saying the people who are homophones / misogynists / xenophobes/ spread hate-speech / are insulting everyone / internet trolls are just using their "right to freedom of speech". That has nothing to do with freedom of speech, because by being intolerant, you're denying the right itself, and by that measure, you don't deserve the right yourself, so it is perfectly fine to publicly humiliate such cancerous thought.

>> No.6805508 [DELETED] 

>>6805496
South Korea. That's all I'm going to say. South Korea is a matriarchal society and it is the most superficial country on earth.

Also, equality is not the repositioning of power.

>> No.6805522 [DELETED] 

>>6805508
>South Korea is a matriarchal society
And it is one of the most important economies in the world, a cultural rising power house, it is incredibly big on soft power, doesn't start any wars unlike USA, and it fights for peace and rational talks with North Korea.

It is by far the best nation in Asia, and one of the best in the world, following Nordic countries.

>> No.6805514 [DELETED] 
File: 39 KB, 711x431, 1356971186256.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805514

>>6805496
>I can already see how the man babbies will start quoting the website name

And for good reason, too

>craked

>> No.6805519 [DELETED] 

Can we please just petition tumblr? Please?

>> No.6805529 [DELETED] 

>>6805366
>So forgive some of them if they develop a victim complex after being bullied all of their lives and start to confuse it with rejection.
If you develop any sort of mental complex that prevents you from functioning normally in a social sphere there's therapy for that. If you're being harassed due to your looks and it's something as do-able (since losing weight isn't easy) as shedding a couple of pounds and getting fit then the problem and answer become obvious. Also, isn't being belittled the same as being rejected anyway?

>They just want to be treated like human beings and not be pointed and laughed at like animals at the zoo for just wanting to dress as a character they like.
Okay. When I put on a costume it's usually because I want to be different. I don't want to be the center of attention, but I definitely want others to notice me. If I want to partake in the revelry or celebration of a work of art or celebration, there's more ways than one other than putting on an outfit, like conversing with others. Also, I'm sure these same people are aware of their "issue" so they cosplay knowing full well what the repercussions of doing so are. If, ultimately, they simply want to dress as a character they like then they have to be aware of whether or not they will be made fun of depending on how well they execute it, especially if your body size does not match the character you are dressing up as.

>> No.6805532 [DELETED] 

>>6805496
>Cracked

If you are using that, then I might as well use fox news or daily mail.

>> No.6805534 [DELETED] 

>>6805522
Don't bring in my country into your hypocritical fascism.

We real feminists in Norway are doing just fine.

>> No.6805540 [DELETED] 

>>6805496
Pft. I've seen that article before. Its satire.

>> No.6805543 [DELETED] 

>>6805510
It's people like you who fail to see the big picture. People like you who idiotically punish an demographic of people simply due to the feelings of a few of them. You fail to realize that the world, the country and even specific states aren't all broken down evenly and cannot be measured with 'privilege'. You're an idiot because you put all people into groups when they should not be, white people are all guilty black people are all innocent, men are all guilty, women are all innocent, skinny people are all guilty, fat people are all innocent, cis people are all guilty trans people are all innocent. You fail to realize that you cause all the world's problems, opening them up like wounds and trying to point a finger of blame.

>> No.6805546 [DELETED] 

>>6805522
>And it is one of the most important economies in the world, a cultural rising power house

And it was men who built that up dearie.

>> No.6805555 [DELETED] 

>>6805508
And lets not forget Japan.

Why do so many men shun relationships over there? I find it amusing that women find this frustrating to no end.

>> No.6805562 [DELETED] 

>>6805532
That article is presenting an opinion. It's just like you linking your favorite... misogyny guy, like whoever was that misogynist's who cried about being blocked in Toronto... article. It is just as legit and you're only ignoring it because it disagrees with you and is posted on a site that mostly posts humorous content.

>>6805540
It isn't. Articles about women are serious on Cracked.
cracked.com/article_19785_5-ways-modern-men-are-trained-to-hate-women.html
Try telling me this was satire, see what happens.

>>6805546
But it is run by women. It's like you're saying that Abraham Lincoln was nothing, because all he's done was actually done by other men.

>>6805543
> You're an idiot because you put all people into groups when they should not be, white people are all guilty black people are all innocent, men are all guilty, women are all innocent, skinny people are all guilty, fat people are all innocent, cis people are all guilty trans people are all innocent
I never said or implied that. Your post is reeking of projecting /strawmanning.

>>6805534
If you were a real feminist, you would agree with me.

>> No.6805574 [DELETED] 

>If you were a real feminist, you would agree with me.

No, you are a delusional fascist and you're sabotaging for normal, level-headed feminists. Norway sure as hell doesn't want you.

>> No.6805577 [DELETED] 

>>6805562
>cracked.com/article_19785_5-ways-modern-men-are-trained-to-hate-women.html
holy shit, I take my words back
that article is actually an amazing eye opener for me

>> No.6805580 [DELETED] 

>>6805562
>But it is run by women

SK got a female prime minister.

And even if it truly were female dominated, then they'd, simply be stepping on cosy platform built by men.

>> No.6805582 [DELETED] 

>>6805562
That article is satire.

>> No.6805583 [DELETED] 

>>6805574
To be fair, she doesn't sound any insaner than the femnazi ladies from Brainwash.

If anything, you should let that comedian guy who publicly showed his scrotum / taint to everyone run your country, he seems like a pretty okay & liberal guy.

>> No.6805602 [DELETED] 

>>6805522
You mean the most racist, nationalist country on earth?
We talking about the same South Korea?

>> No.6805612 [DELETED] 

>>6805582


>>6805602
That's Japan you're talking about. A male dominated country that treats anyone who has had non-Japanese blood anywhere down their family tree as a gaijin, forever.

South Korea is much more open minded, and definitely the most open minded of all Asian countries. They still have a way to go, but by embracing feminist ideals, they're miles ahead of the rest.

>> No.6805642 [DELETED] 

>>6805583

Those gender studies were a crime against nature. Norway collectively realised this and now we're no longer funding any of their pseudoscience.

Might I add that we're the most gender-equal country in the world.

>> No.6805657 [DELETED] 

>>6805562
Male here, I literally almost cried after reading that article. I feel like a complete monster now. It's so true it hurts.

>> No.6805660 [DELETED] 

>>6805612
>South Korea is much more open minded, and definitely the most open minded of all Asian countries.
Um, no. They are are closed up to foreigners as Japanese are. I think that before the resetting of the rules we used to have threads on that topic, and a lot of anons who went to SK complained a lot about everyone being openly racist towards them, even being slapped and when she called the police, they questioned her, and told all her personal info to the aggressor(ie where she worked, and so on). This is just an example.
>embracing feminist ideals
This actually made me chuckle.

>> No.6805667 [DELETED] 

>>6805657
like dis if u cry erry tiem

>> No.6805675 [DELETED] 

>>6805612
I was stationed in South Korea. You have no fucking clue what you're talking about. Open-minded my ass.
Believe what you want to believe, but if you think that simply having a female prime minister makes it more socially advanced then keep believing that.

>> No.6805725 [DELETED] 

>>6805675
I will.

>> No.6805778 [DELETED] 

>>6805562
>Frodo gets Sam

Goddamnit Cracked, sometimes I love you.

>> No.6805795 [DELETED] 
File: 13 KB, 244x256, 1331838282446.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805795

>>6804300

Filthy casual detected.

Go pretend you understand what the offside rule is and bother ruin someone elses hobby.

>> No.6805814 [DELETED] 

>>6805778
Oh my, anon, I also laughed at that one. After I laughed I actually wondered if maybe there's another movie with a guy called Frodo and there's a girl called Sam but then I though that this is genius. Hopefully, it wasn't there because the author spent too much time on fanfiction.net/mediaminer

>> No.6805816 [DELETED] 

>>6805725
Dude, Margaret Thatcher, the fucking Iron Maiden wasn't particularly fond of feminism. She basically said that if you need a movement to tell you that you are strong and capable, then your not.

>> No.6805827 [DELETED] 
File: 103 KB, 474x440, 1331255345181.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805827

>>6804700

>power fantasies

This is such fucking bullshit. Idiots just dodging the point using this fucking point every time.

The fact it appeals to the male power fantasy does not undo the fact they're sexual idealized super humans, just like their female counterparts.
The "sexually objectified" women often cited could just just as easily be construed as a power fantasy of their own. They're shown to be just as competent and superhuman in ability. The only difference is in appearance, with the men having ideal masculine traits and the women having ideal feminine traits.

The vast majority of men and women want to see/play ideal masculine men.
The vast majority of men and women want to see/play ideal feminine women.

Subversions are fun occasionally, but Tumblr needs to stop getting mad and people just enjoy this and it isn't because of an evil patriarchal conspiracy to ruin their boring little lives.

>> No.6805842 [DELETED] 

>>6805827
Power fantasies =/= Sexual fantasies

>The fact it appeals to the male power fantasy does not undo the fact they're sexual idealized super humans

Who the fuck are they sexually idealized by? Women? A super muscled guy with bulging veins is not what most females are attracted to.

>> No.6805846 [DELETED] 
File: 24 KB, 180x200, 1338053507385.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805846

>>6805496

>implying women don't have a huge role in leadership anyway and having always had a large part in politics, even if it wasn't the overt front and center kind

You're assuming women running the world would instantly fix it's problems?

Have you ever met a women? They're no better or worse, they've got all the same fucking problems as men, they just go about dealing with it differently. The results are always the same though.

Also

>Cracked

Why not just go cite Fox News or the Onion as a source?

>> No.6805870 [DELETED] 

>>6805842
> A super muscled guy with bulging veins is not what most females are attracted to.
Except it is. He needs to be rich / have a status too, but other than that, that's exactly what the average woman with ~90 IQ wants.

>> No.6805877 [DELETED] 
File: 95 KB, 234x237, 1299893656409.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805877

>>6805827
omg ur an idiot

let's take gears of war for example, this is a game not marketed to or "intended" for women whatsoever, so what's more likely, that everyone has disgustingly huge muscles so that the fat neckbear playing can envision himself a big manly man, or so that a woman will find it ~titillating

>> No.6805889 [DELETED] 

>>6805870
Are you attracted to a super muscled guy with bulging veins? Because I think I'm actually at little disgusted by it. Impressive, but freaky.

>> No.6805887 [DELETED] 
File: 5 KB, 125x126, 1341808181853.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805887

>>6805842

>Who the fuck are they sexually idealized by? Women? A super muscled guy with bulging veins is not what most females are attracted to.

Same thing I hear every time from the "feminist' crowd.

Plenty of women are attracted to this. But more then that, it's the traditional idealized male image.
Women are more diverse in their tastes when it comes to physical traits in a partner, no two women like the exact same thing generally. No one can just give a universal image for a the perfect sexy man, because of varying tastes.

Men like the same physical traits on the whole, it's easy to please the vast majority of them in that regard.
It's the opposite when it comes to personality; no two men share the ideal woman. Some like dumb bimbo's, some like assertive dominant girls and some like 'em ditzy but intelligent.

It's not misogyny motivating character design, it's knowing the damn market and basic gender psychology.

There are always subversions in taste, but they're always going to go for the largest market.

You could have a big fat ugly and muscled female character, but good luck selling that. It doesn't make most men want to look twice at it and very few women want to project onto tubby.

>> No.6805918

Oh cool the dumb comic is gone, now we can talk about the subject of how we started to cosplay and not this SJ shit. I was afraid of answering OP for feel of being off topic

>> No.6805927 [DELETED] 
File: 74 KB, 960x960, noface.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6805927

>How did you get your start?
I started this past weekend

?Who introduced you to the scene?
I've always known about it, just never had interest until my girlfriend wanted to be Chihiro, so i went as No Face (Picture related)

First costume, but I think it went well ;_;

>> No.6805928

>Actually deleting each of the 250+ OT posts, manually, instead of just nuking the thread.
This is some epic tier dedication.

>> No.6805947

>>6805928
Probably had to be done that way since the thread is technically on topic.

>> No.6805961

I started watching sailormoon on Fox at like 6am before school and fell in love with it. I would always try to imagine what the senshi (lol "scouts") would look like irl. Since I resembled sailormars the most I decided I wanted to try to do my best to bring her to life. This was the year 1998 in all of it's glory.

>> No.6805971

I've always love dressing up as a kid and put as much effort back then in making my halloween costume as I do with my cosplays now. Months or weeks before halloween I would start my costume. I even went through most of high school not knowing about conventions and cosplaying, always focused on that one day of the year.

Then suddenly I got into star wars and found out about NYCC (it was the 2nd year of it's run) an I was hooked sine then. In my search online for tips on making my star war costume i found there were while communities of people who make costumes who where them more then once a year.

Now I don't try at all at halloween (as an adult it's just full of dumb drunk people, bleh) and I go to as many cons as I can. Even planning a photoshot soon.

>> No.6806306

Bump because this is my bedtime story thread of choice tonight

>> No.6806415 [DELETED] 

can anyone link the OP comic again, or give the creator or source or something?

>> No.6806547 [DELETED] 

>>6806415
No.

>> No.6806753 [DELETED] 

>>6806547
why

>> No.6806801 [DELETED] 
File: 381 KB, 500x2141, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6806801

>>6806415

>> No.6806804 [DELETED] 

>>6806801
This is a good'n.
Makes me chuckle every time.

>> No.6806806 [DELETED] 

>>6806801
>not wearing a wig
disgusting

>> No.6807116

>So, why did you start cosplaying?
Because I've made a huge mistake.

>> No.6807685

To heal my alcolol addiction.

It was a random decision.

I was introduced by my cousin, Konstantin.

>> No.6807735

>be in 7th grade
>just watched CCS in authenitic moon language for the first time
>go to friends house for halloween
>she has this incredible Sakura costume
>Ask her where it came from
>"Oh my sister made it for me to wear at x convention last year!"
>Shows me pictures of the convention
>Determined to go the next year
>Purchase costume off of ebay
>Have an extremely fun time the following year at the convention
>Repeat forever but gradually learn how to sew
and now it's 2013