Nitpicking in Lolita

[Anonymous No.7414707]

Not quite ita but not quite right. Not really ugly but not quite pretty. A bit too fatty but not a ham planet. For fun, as a hobbyist troll or as critiquing therapy for the serious autist poster, blow off steam or vent your passive-aggressive jelly by posting these things here.

For real ita, use the ita thread. But you can squabble about what ita is here and post your picky opinion with a photo. Parody and irony and sarcasm welcome.

[Anonymous No.7414715]

I saw someone claim that boring coords count as ita too and I think thats inherently incorrect. That implies that basically every old school coord that consists of a solid color dress, unembellished blouse and regular head accessory was ita when it wasn't, though it was certainly a bit different from the lolita of today.

[Anonymous No.7414722]

>>7414715
I think that as long as the look is clean, polished nd well thought, 'plain' outfits aren't awful. But I also think that you have to be prettier/thinner to wear a goo plain outfit because the overall look count more than just the actual coordinate.
Plain coords can even be top-tier, if it's really well styles and fit the wearer perfectly.

[Anonymous No.7414736]

>>7414715
So a thread like this for saying "I think this coord is boring" instead of calling everything ita? I think some of the nitpicking might just be buttmadness too. I'm tired of seeing boring in the ita threads too but I'll post someone here and say what I do not LIKE about their coord. Or post someone with a great coord otherwise but sub-par hair, or fugly (to me) shoes.

[Anonymous No.7414882]

This is not lolita.

[Anonymous No.7414887]

>>7414882
Nop, skirt's too short. Lolita inspired, sure, or just casual cute j-fashion, but not lolita at all.

[Anonymous No.7414900]

>>7414882
No, but if she tagged as lolita it's understandable, since it's a brand skirt. It's more otome or general cute fashion though.

[Anonymous No.7414908]

>someone posts mediocre/slightly off outfit
>"she looks cute gtfo vendetta-chan"
>"are you blind so awful is she your friend or something"

Every ita thread.
It's either "everything's fine as long as she's pretty and colors match" or "everything lesser than fashion-show worthy outfits is ita".

I know there are tons of horribly misguided weaboos in saggy milanoo dresses, I see them at every con. Do we really need to delve into "I don't like X with Y therefore ITA"?

[Anonymous No.7414911]

>>7414882
Perfect nitpick. Tagging a brand item but the coord is not Lolita will piss off many. Technically not incorrect but I think most will object because the use doesn't fit the aesthetic.

>>7414908
It's better to put that kind of thing for a nitpicking session and keep the ita thread for ita and not opinion of what we like/dislike. I see lots that I dislike. Are they ita? Usually not.

[Anonymous No.7414917]

Ita literally means "It hurts to look at", not "I think [x] could be better and this coord isn't perfect, but otherwise it's whatever."
If something that's NOT Lolita is tagged as "lolita", that's just some retard who doesn't know what the fashion is, not ita.
Why doesn't anyone understand this

[Anonymous No.7414929]

>>7414917
Most do or learn quickly. That's why we have a nitpick thread here right now for everything not ita but still whack, mis-tagged or that we just don't like.
>>7414882
Technically this could be the other type of Lolita, haha!

[Anonymous No.7414946]

>>7414882
Source of the skirt? It's cute.

[Anonymous No.7415016]

>>7414946
Angelic Pretty's Polka Dot Chocolate

[Anonymous No.7415046]

You can gain a lot of skill with makeup, work out, change your body, learn how to put together good and impressive looking coords. But in the long run, it doesn't matter. Some bitch will complain and nitpick you because she has nothing more productive to do with her time.

The moment you're rushing to a meet after work and don't go all out because you don't have time perfectly arrange every detail or fuss with falsies you're a fucking ita.

The moment someone is jelly that you got that dress they wanted but couldn't even afford. You're an ita.

The moment someone doesn't like your nose, you're an ita.

Go from fatty-chan to fitty-chan, a well toned body is ita. Only tiny dainty 17 year old pretty hime-chans are lolita anon! Don't you know?

[Anonymous No.7415049]

>>7415046
I wish I was still a tiny dainty 17 year old pretty hime chan

[Anonymous No.7415072]

>>7415046
Personal goal:
>leaned out visible muscle ita

Also
>The moment someone is jelly that you got that dress they wanted but couldn't even afford.
So true.

I like seeing full-on actual 'ita' coords; not just cute outfits tagged as lolita that may not quite be lolita or coords with one item I disagree with. Something satisfying about the resulting cringe.

Also, thanks OP, good thread idea.

[Anonymous No.7415276]

>>7414882
her coords are all so bad and her closet is huge

[Anonymous No.7415301]

>>7415276
also, not even jelly of her closet, I wish she had awesome coords that were inspirational. When she posted her wardrobe I immediately asked for her blog to see inspiration for my wardrobe and it was all shit

[Anonymous No.7415374]

>>7415276
>>7415301
I like the way she coords even if it is simple or a bit lacking, but I prefer to wear lolita items in a more casual/otome way on a regular basis anyway. I liked that wonder queen outfit she planned.

[Anonymous No.7415386]

>>7414707
Why is she complaining about not wearing wrist cuffs correctly, when she's only wearing one?

[Anonymous No.7415402]

>>7415374
I wear it in a casual/otome way too. I like her coord with the pink cutsew and polkadot chocolate skirt but everything else.. they're just so bad. The blouse doesn't fit well with miniskirts and ankle socks, and she looks so awkward.

[Anonymous No.7415403]

>>7415386
I think she's wearing a scrunchie on her hand

[Anonymous No.7415518]

I scrolled past this on tumblr and got excited at first to see a pretty ouji prince, but...the longer I look at this the more things I notice wrong. Which is a shame because the girl's quite lovely and her makeup is nice, but her whites are all slightly off, that gauzy buttcape over-emphasizes her waistline/ladyhips, and I don't care for her choice of socks/shoes. it looks like most of the items she chose were picked because they're brand, not because they necessarily went together. also this outfit is a great example of one of my major pet peeves, which is when metal accents don't match. if you're doing a outfit with gold accents, do all gold. if you're doing it with silver, do all silver. but a mishmash of antique gold, bronze and bright gold is just weird-looking to me.

[Anonymous No.7415528]

>>7415518
What a trainwreck of an outfit. I bet it has a ton of notes because of the photography.

I don't mean to be rude, but holy shit she looks emancipated. It might just be the angle but she looks like she's going to snap.

[Anonymous No.7415533]

>>7415518
I think if her shoes were a light white like the vest and hat, it would be a lot more balanced. You can wear a mix of whites as long as it's worn cohesively. This outfit isn't really so cohesive, though.

[Anonymous No.7415537]

>>7415528

>she looks emancipated

...do you mean emaciated?

[Anonymous No.7415544]

>>7415537
Lol, oops. I did a typo and must have accidentally autocorrected it to that.

[Anonymous No.7415551]

>>7415533
For me the clash of styles with the shoes and socks irks me even more than the colors. But the colors of them mismatch even more, it brings not only white but off-white/ivory and beige into the equation. As well as pink and brown.

Why the fuck would you wear soft florals with a harder masculine look? And in colors that don't even match as well as the theme. This is really bothering me more than it should.

[Anonymous No.7415547]

>>7415518
If you crop it off at the knee up it's pretty cool

>>7415528
lol emancipated
but yeah that angle is definitely a slimming one, perhaps too much in this case

[Anonymous No.7415549]

>>7415544

My phone autocorrected to it too, so I feel you

Thanks for the good laugh though. Christ I needed that today

[Anonymous No.7415575]

>>7415528
nearly 4,000 notes.

glad I'm not the only one who's a little confused by that..

[Anonymous No.7415576]

>>7415518
Can you give the tumblr? i tried reverse google search but just a ton of ita blogs showed up..

[Anonymous No.7415586]

>>7415386
Hehe, you win the observant prize. I was wondering who would mention it first.
Thats the spirit...NITPICK!

[Anonymous No.7415587]

>>7415576
http://zimiel.tumblr.com

[Anonymous No.7415659]

>>7415575
>nearly 4,000 notes

Sheesh. Tumblr has the worst taste. The nicer coordinate often go unnoticed for atrocious ones like this. I guess well coordinate outfits aren't edgy enough.

Was Tumblr always this way? I don't remember it being so bad in the first year or two that it was up.

[Anonymous No.7415661]

>>7415659
Not really, no. It seems to have gotten worse when it started linking into things like instagram/twitter/facebook so you can post to all of the above from one single platform.

[Anonymous No.7415674]

>>7415518
>butt cape

[Anonymous No.7415705]

>>7415518
Where are these shoes from? I keep seeing them in coords but people rarely post where they're from.

[Anonymous No.7415706]

>>7415518
It looks like cheap cosplay, not a wearable fashion.

[Anonymous No.7415708]

Speaking of wristcuffs earlier...
What's the "right" way of wearing them? I'm paranoid that I'm wearing them wrong now.
Also I have a pair of wristcuffs that are too big for me. They're really loose but don't fall right off because my hand is big enough to prevent if from sliding off, but it's kind of weird. Should be okay, right?

[Anonymous No.7415709]

>>7415705
I think they're Innocent World?

[Anonymous No.7415715]

>>7415708
I'm pretty sure that the statement of "right" is facetious. People wear them all different ways. Over long sleeves for more decoration, under long sleeves for a bit of wrist poof, on their ankles to make their socks cuter.

Wear 'em how you want.

[Drawthread No.7415720]

>>7415708
I think it basically means the bottom of the bow facing the your hand, so that the bow looks upside down to you, but right side up to others. Also, what >>7415715 said.

[Anonymous No.7415735]

>>7415705
>>7415715

Yep, they're innocent world. They're still up on the website.

[Anonymous No.7415740]

>>7415708
I read somewhere that you're supposed to wear them under a long-sleeved jacket or your shirtcuffs if they don't already have lace. that's what people mean by 'right way', it's not just the direction they're facing. It was basically a method for ladies in the 19th century to pretend they were wearing a blouse under their fancy high-necked riding jackets without actually having to suffer an additional layer of clothing.

[Anonymous No.7415763]

>>7415518
Hm, I don't like the socks/shoes and I wish there was a different collar on the blouse, but everything else looks pretty okay to me. I'm giving her a pass on the bronze buttons with gold braid since that appears to be how the vest is made. I suppose one of my pet peeves is bright gold braid/buttons/fringe all over anything, I feel like it looks cheap compared to a more antique gold color.

[Anonymous No.7415895]

>>7415518
idk i like the outfit itself but damn that shop. went on her tumblr and found the close up pictures. they went to hell with it.

[Anonymous No.7416073]

I just hate makeup like this

Ruins any form of coord for me instantly

[Anonymous No.7416086]

>>7416073
Were they serious?
Why would you even THINK about going out like this.

[Anonymous No.7416099]

>>7416073
I thought it was going to be some ott gyaru make up but omg what the hell is this???

[Anonymous No.7416115]

>>7416073
I-is that drawn on in paint?

[Anonymous No.7416125]

>>7416073
Who leaves their house thinking that make up looks good.

[Anonymous No.7416172]

>>7416073
...Was she supposed to do a skit on stage... this is only acceptable for stage because it would read from a far distance.

[Anonymous No.7416614]

>>7416073
There's literally nothing good about this. I don't understand how people can think that eyelashes/eyeliner 3 inches below your waterline looks good. Not even gonna touch on that lipstick. She has cute hair though.

[Anonymous No.7416724]

>>7416073
I love everybodys reaction to this

[Anonymous No.7416737]

>>7416073
THIS IS ACTUALLY A THING?
no, holy hell that make up is driving me insane.
WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

[Anonymous No.7417796]

>>7415046
>The moment someone is jelly that you got that dress they wanted but couldn't even afford

Speaking of this, I think it'd be nice to have a 'bitches wearing your dream dress horribly' venting thread (or post em here, whatever), even for dresses you have. Sometimes I pass by coords for dresses I love, whether I own them already or not, and just cringe at how boring or off the coord is. That's where I end up wanting to nitpick the most.

>>7415518
The reason this bothered me when I scrolled past is because it looks like an overshooped cosplay photo, not a lolita coord.

[Anonymous No.7417808]

>>7416737
see >>7416614
it's just disgusting. i don't care how sweet she is or happy or w/e it's gross.

[Anonymous No.7417821]

>>7417796
I'd rather see a "Dress Wars: Who wore it better" kind of thing.
The other would quickly descend into

Poorfags and fattys whining with jelly about someone buying their "doresu o yume"

..and people bitching at them...nahhhh!

Try posting a few here though maybe.

[Anonymous No.7417824]

>>7417821
We've had threads like that before, with comparisons of different prints/cuts on different people. I always like those threads.

[Anonymous No.7417880]

>>7417821
Who cares who's doing the bitching, as long as there's something to nitpick that's the point.

Anyway, shit like this comes to mind.

[Anonymous No.7417960]

>>7417880
I fucking hate brogues with lolita. It rarely ever looks good, especially when worn with sweeter coords.

[Anonymous No.7418030]

>>7417960
Is that Lor? God, she always looks so haggard.

[Anonymous No.7418134]

>>7416614

jesus christ. that fucking nose contour.

[Anonymous No.7418166]

>>7417880
Classic?
Frumpy?
Cat lady uniform?
Someone's aunt?
Nerd girl?
I have trouble telling with this kind of thing...
The glasses glare is creepy.

[Anonymous No.7418181]

Does a coord with only 2 colors in different shades qualify for this thread?

[Anonymous No.7418189]

>>7417960
speaking of this, is country lolita actually a thing? sounds stupid as hell, it just ends up as adding a plain hat to a boring coord.

[Anonymous No.7418195]

>>7418181
If you don't like it and want to pick at it then yes...yes it does.

[Anonymous No.7418201]

If she is going to wear gloves and a hat, she needs to do her hair and makeup.

[Anonymous No.7418206]

>>7418189
I'm of the opinion that it's not, it's just a sweet or classic coord... It's a theme, sure, but only as much as carousels or cats or crowns are.

[Anonymous No.7418210]

>>7418189
Preach. Also ita/ poor coordinators tend to love it because no one quite knows what the hell it is and therefore they can't be "Wrong"?

[Anonymous No.7418705]

I'm a little confused at what she's trying to achieve.

[Anonymous No.7418803]

I think most of mintkismet's coords are bad.
Out of all the outfits she's posted I've only seen one or two I liked. Plus some of the things she posts on Tumblr seem downright attention whore-y.

[Anonymous No.7418828]

>>7418803
What are you picking at here?

[Anonymous No.7418833]

>>7418828
Not that anon, but there's so much going on on her lower half, while the upper half is really plain.

[Anonymous No.7418845]

>>7418705
That fill-in piece?
The only things I could think of was
- cover odd tie motif or
- disguise bust gap since it's laced closed and still looks roomy.

[Anonymous No.7418844]

>>7414715
A few weeks ago someone got so upset that they were called out on posting boring coords in an ita thread that they made a NEW thread for making fun of boring/average coords because "the ita thread has too many rules hurr durr tumblr" but since that's such a stupid idea to begin with everyone in the thread thought it was just a coord critique thread where people post coords that can be improved and OP GOT MAD ABOUT IT

long story short: I am really hating the lean toward '__________ I don't like/find boring is ita'.
I get it, we don't always have new fodder for robust ita threads, but you're an asshole for just posting shit you don't like. What's the point? Are you going to fix it by posting it in an ita thread? Or just underwhelm everyone in the thread?

[Anonymous No.7418851]

can we have some crit of some otome coords? I want to wear otome however I would like some more guidance on what to wear and shop for, along with what makes an outfit more interesting and obviously otome and not just a cute outfit. I don't see those get critiqued very often and I'm sure there's a lot of things people commonly get wrong with it.

[Anonymous No.7418853]

>>7418201
I'm surprisingly ok with the lack of make-up or hairstyling, but a natural look would be better without gloves or even long socks.

[Anonymous No.7418857]

>>7416073
Nitpick 2: I hate top down angles on pictures. What are you doing to her legs. Even if you have a cameraphone, man, angle that shit any other way

[Anonymous No.7418859]

What about this?

http://hello-batty.tumblr.com/post/79035036570/hey-pretty-3-im-new-to-lolita-and-wanted-to-go-for-a

>And, of course if you did a Kuro Lolita outfit with a pastel with that would look so cute!!! <3

what

[Anonymous No.7418862]

>>7418803
Huh, I tend to think of her coords as the opposite, usually. They're...mild? Not entirely boring but nothing super out there--like her entire personality. "Attention whore-y" never really springs to mind.

[Anonymous No.7418863]

>>7418844
OP here and the points were intended to be roughly these:
- to blow off steam
- to keep the nitpicking and squabbling out of the ita thread
- to post 'this isn't even lolita' things
-to post wtf things tagged lolita
- to yes, just post opinion on something we don't like for whatever reason. (Don't need a reason)

So far, I think it's going along ok.
It's also clearly labelled so people who wish to avoid it, can.

[Anonymous No.7418867]

>>7418828
If you can't tell, then you have a lot of learning to do.

[Anonymous No.7418866]

>>7418833
... That's called balance.

If it's loud on one half, you keep the other half more plain to balance it out.

If you don't do that, it tends to be an eyesore.

[Anonymous No.7418870]

>>7418803
This would be a great coord for many skirts, but not that one. The skirt seems really out of place!

[Anonymous No.7418872]

>>7418866
>If you don't do that, it tends to be an eyesore.

Lolll. This outfit is an eyesore. The only reason you think it looks good is because she's thin/pretty and wearing AP.

Firstly, the colors don't match at all. She has like 5 different shades of pink and blue (and possibly mint?) in there. Secondly, way too many motifs look really messy. Thirdly, way too many details that scream in your face. Neither half is plain whatsoever.

[Anonymous No.7418873]

>>7418866
Uh no, that's imbalanced. With your logic wearing a suit jacket, vest and tie with jeans and sneakers is "balanced".

[Anonymous No.7418875]

>>7418862
I think people think she is attention whorey because she once had this picture dump while anon of amazing otome coords, and included a couple of her own pictures without saying it.

[Anonymous No.7418878]

>>7418857
As a shortie who constantly has people taking topdown pictures of me even when I ask them to make sure not to do so, sometimes you just can't win.

[Anonymous No.7418879]

>>7418873
Not exactly, though I don't agree with that anon. Wearing a suit jacket, vest, and tie is like wearing most of a coord set (maybe the complete set if the tie is from the same release) and maybe a detail or two that's different (if the tie is different or whatever)

Nitpicking

[Anonymous No.7418881]

>>7418134
>implying contouring

[Anonymous No.7418883]

>>7418851
Yes. There was (is?) an otome thread but I think it was just for posting pretties...though shopping questions will likely get better response there.

I made this a Lolita nitpick thread partially to deflect the fussing and nitpicking in the ita thread but several have posted other things to comment on. Post some otome things you've been looking at and ask questions, maybe?

[Anonymous No.7418885]

>>7418859
I think she haZ a confus and needs a clarification (or 50) sent to her ask box...

[Anonymous No.7418890]

>>7418866
What this girl does is the opposite of balance.
You can't just slam all kinds of patterns together on one part, and keep the other part completely plain.

[Anonymous No.7418896]

>>7418803
>>7418866
>>7418872

The blouse pink should match the pink in the socks and ditto for the blues in the hair accessories, cutsew bows and shoes.
How long has she been making coordinates? This usually improves with time and a larger wardrobe for better choices vs 'wear what you have' but...there are some people who just never quite get it too.

In a basic coordinate, peripheral items generally must match each other in color, shade and tone as well as matching one color in the main piece.
There are exceptions for contrast and accent, of course but this is not that.

[Anonymous No.7418902]

>>7418866
it would have been more balanced if she wore plain legwear and a small hair accessory. and possibly more normalfag shoes

[Anonymous No.7418904]

>>7418875
..... how do you know it was her then

[Anonymous No.7418917]

>>7418803

>look at her tumblr
>mm ok coords
>she's cute
>see this
>Is she wearing... two blouse?
>why.jpeg

Was she trying to balance color? Because that didn't quite work out.

[Anonymous No.7418927]

>>7418917
Damn, that's horrible.

[Anonymous No.7418929]

>>7418872
>She has like 5 different shades of pink and blue (and possibly mint?) in there.

I think the sax colors match pretty well and the pinks match through the socks, headdress, and cutsew. BUT, I don't think any of those things actually matches the skirt at all, which is why it looks really off to me. It's like she should have worn a completely different skirt.

[Anonymous No.7418938]

>>7418866
what the hell are you talking about? you're saying that if I have an elephant on one side of a scale and nothing on the other side, that it would be balanced.

[Anonymous No.7418948]

>>7418885
>>7418859

yeah this girl doesn't know what she's talking about. First off, creepy cute IS just a certain theme of accessories, it has no link to lolita specifically and definitely not a link to prints (WAMH tried it and failed horribly, I laugh at the fact that all they do is acrylic laser cut necklaces and pins now).

I really can't even pick out what the hell she's trying to say here. She's talking about pastel goth? The girl didn't ask about that, she asked about adding pastels into a gothic coord, which I have no idea how that would look or work either, while still being gothic.

now i'm just imagining a pink and white iron gate print and it's hilarious

[Anonymous No.7418951]

>>7418917
dem shoes though. this would be fine if she just took the extra blouse and that belt off

[Anonymous No.7418953]

>>7418948
>now i'm just imagining a pink and white iron gate print and it's hilarious

oh gosh.

[Anonymous No.7418958]

>>7418953
what if that's the new fad in 2014? Pastel super gothic prints and dresses. And obviously I'm talking about super intricate MMM-esque prints and like... Atelier boz and Atelier Pierrot designs

[Anonymous No.7418963]

>>7418948
Vampire Requiem in lavender coorded in a very gothic way is a gothic coord with a pastel colorway, but not "pastel goth." this chick is just dumb.

[Anonymous No.7418969]

>>7418963
Yeah I didn't think about the lav colorway of VR.

[Anonymous No.7418997]

>>7414882
Not too sure how I feel about completely bare legs in lolita and casual lolita

[Anonymous No.7418998]

>>7418938
Not that anon, but the balance she is referring to is a common concept in western fashion. (Ex: You can't wear patterned pants, patterned top, patterned shoes. However, you can pick one of the three to be patterned.) I'm not sure if this rule carries over to j-fashion however?

[Anonymous No.7419009]

>>7418997
brands make ankle socks, they're not really anything new or controversial.

[Anonymous No.7419010]

>>7418917
The shape totally doesn't look like Lolita.

[Anonymous No.7419014]

>>7418998
It does to some extent, if you wear multiple patterns they should compliment each other, not clash horribly. And if you're all patterns and shit on the lower half of your body and no patterns at all on the upper half, that looks horrible.
She could've had some bright cardigan with accessories, a plain blouse or shirt, a patterend skirt, plain socks. There, balanced.

[Anonymous No.7419021]

>>7419009
it just feels so wrong

[Anonymous No.7419031]

>>7418998
Speaking of western fashion rules, I always heard that wearing shoes that match your dress is taboo so when I first saw lolita I was put off by the matchy matchy.

[Anonymous No.7419049]

>>7418951
Or maybe a different color belt? The dark brown is just coming out of nowhere.

[Anonymous No.7419050]

>>7418917
There seems to be a strange dark camisole thing going on as well...

[Anonymous No.7419055]

>>7418862
>>7418875
I noticed she likes to talk about how her bf is japanese a lot. Seems like she's trying to legitimize herself and prove she's not a weeb by having a japanese boyfriend, so sad.

[Anonymous No.7419056]

>>7418917
>>7419049
The brown belt is picking up the color of the brown bows on the shoes and there is some brown in the print but not brown overall enough to justify that big of a splash of a wide brown bow belt in the middle. Also darker belt with lighter shoes doesn't look that great

[Anonymous No.7419058]

>>7419055
If that's the case then she should get one of his sisters or cousins or aunties to give her some fashion advice, haha.

[Anonymous No.7419060]

>>7419056
Yeah but there's only a tiny bit of dark brown in the whole print and the bows on the shoes look like she added them herself..

[Anonymous No.7419087]

>>7418997
On a different note, how do all of you feel about people who wear OTK socks with patterns over top of plain tights?

[Anonymous No.7419096]

>>7419055
I thought she talked about him a lot because she was sort of boring, so that relationship takes up about like at least 30% of her personality. And to be fair, she is bouncing back and forth between countries when she sees him

[Anonymous No.7419099]

>>7419055
Unrelated but I noticed she calls him "boyfran". Man I hate it when people do that, it really rustles my jimmies.

[Anonymous No.7419103]

>>7419096
She's probably just using him as an excuse to go/move to Japan.

[Anonymous No.7419104]

>>7419103
Idk, that seems like a reach even if we're being assholes.

[Anonymous No.7419106]

>>7419087
I have no problem with that at all. I used to wear just sheer pantyhose under OTKs to help keep them up, but now I wear a very subtle lace pattern in a matching color to the dress. So like a pair of black tights with super light/small polka dots or a lace pattern that is subtle, underneath a pair of black otks with a print that matches the dress

[Anonymous No.7419125]

>>7418904
At the end she said something about "btw this is a picture of me", before anons pointed out that she had already posted several of her own pictures earlier as examples of amazing otome coords. She admitted that it was herself that posted it after that.

[Anonymous No.7419137]

>>7419103
>>7419099
>>7419096
>>7419055
>>7419125
You're picking at her life/personality and this is supposed to be about clothes, not drama.

[Anonymous No.7419148]

>>7419087
>>7419106
Mana wears lace tights or stockings with otk.
I will try it too.

[Anonymous No.7419153]

>>7418845
The fill in piece is built into the JSK. It's a hard one to coordinate with regular blouses because of the neckline being so low. It generally looks best with a scooped or square necked blouse.

[Anonymous No.7419169]

>>7419137
It's always about drama.

[Anonymous No.7419176]

One of the things that makes me irrationally angry (in concerns to nitpicking, mind you) is the lack of attention to flattering clothing that other fat women have. Believe me, as a larger lolita, I know the struggle of finding the perfect coord as it often seems easy to just settle for less. But poor fabric choices, too-tight measurements, stretched out patterned socks? Seriously, I've seen some coords on fat lolitas that have been utterly ruined for me just because they gave up on paying attention to every minor detail. You're already going to be made attacked for being fat in lolita, so you should put 110% into not looking like a sack of trash.

[Anonymous No.7419178]

>>7419125
I remember that thread and I'm pretty sure she said 'oh that's me' because someone was posting her pictures and she found it weird. But I don't really know. Just saying 'oh that's me' isn't really proof either way I guess.

[Anonymous No.7419183]

>>7419178
See, I really don't understand why you'd have a blog dedicated to your outfits and then get upset when someone posts praising them? Screams attention whore.

[Anonymous No.7419207]

>>7419183
I don't think saying 'oh that's me' is really indicative of being butt hurt but I don't remember the thread much. I think someone posted just a huge dump of her outfits and maybe that's why she thought it was strange? I also now remember someone made a bunch of creepy secrets about her, saying stuff about her legs and arms and how much they loved her. Dunno

[Anonymous No.7419212]

saw this on tumblr...

[Anonymous No.7419215]

>>7419087
I wear white tights always... Didn't think it was an issue at all. Not happy with my skin and there will always be a bit showing over my OTKs when I sit down and such, just way happier with tights + socks
(Plus it's cold as balls here)

[Anonymous No.7419219]

>>7419212
I feel like most of this girls outfits are made by rolling around in a pile of brand and calling it a day.

[Anonymous No.7419221]

>>7419212
infinityneeya is always a little weird with her outfits. She's either head to toe in all the matching accessories (which always looks boring to me) or she just throws shit on with no semblance of trying to match

[Anonymous No.7419227]

>>7419219
This. Always a hot mess. How can someone who owns that much brand dress like shit all the time

[Anonymous No.7419237]

>>7419055
Is this really what people think when white girls have Asian boyfriends? Mine is Korean and I'm paranoid people think I'm with him so I can move to Korea and live a kpop dream or something.

[Anonymous No.7419238]

>>7419212
This is that rich girl right?

The outfit is a mess, nothing goes with anything else

she's got cats on her legs, floral and a house on her dress, and chocolate on her purse. The pinks also don't match.

This would be fine if she got a different cardi, dropped the bag, and changed her tights

[Anonymous No.7419242]

>>7419237
Do you talk about Korea a lot? Do you type in Korean and talk about all your favorite Kpop bands? If you don't do those things, then I doubt anyone thinks anything of it

[Anonymous No.7419247]

>>7419237

Uh, well, that particular comment was talking about how she always had to include the fact that her japanese boyfriend was japanese and doing japanese stuff. As long as you're not obnoxious with that stuff, people shouldn't judge you.

Well, I will. But I'm a judgmental cunt who can't separate my previous personal experience from my judgments. If I get to know you I'll understand your true intentions and I won't judge. And you shouldn't care about me anyways.

[Anonymous No.7419255]

>>7419238
Only pinks that don't seem to match for me is the hat?

Agreed on the motif clash though, but the colors other than the hate are fine to me. Maybe the shoes too but they're pretty neutral.

[Anonymous No.7419273]

>>7416073
sweet gentle jesus

[Anonymous No.7419305]

>>7419176
+1

I think the attention to detail and what flatters you should be a standard applied to all Lolita, but I agree. Chubby-chans are already pariahs in our community, so they're going to be judged extra harshly.

[Anonymous No.7419319]

>>7419212
Eh the problem with this isn't the colors but the motifs. She's not following a theme so it looks really bad in that regard.

[Anonymous No.7419327]

>>7419176
I think this applies to any kind of fashion, really, but then again this is because most of the fashion world doesn't really cater to large people imo.

I think that if you wanna fit into a dress and look good, you should lose weight if possible instead of stretching it to shit and hoping the poof will hide your rolls.

[Anonymous No.7419329]

>>7419021
>>7419009
Brands make crew socks with lace. She is wearing ankle socks. Theres a big difference when you actually wear them or look at them. The ankle socks go far lower and make the legs look more bare. The crew socks cover up the ankle and look normal. Pic related, brand crew socks.

[Anonymous No.7419340]

>>7416073
Gross.

[Anonymous No.7419354]

>>7419329
What you're thinking of is bobbysocks. And yeah, they look weird when folded down as far as she has them, though usually I don't think it's bad to use them if you fold them over a little higher above the anklebone. On her it looks terrible because the skirt is way too short as well.

[Anonymous No.7419365]

>>7419327
I agree with this sentiment to a certain degree. I don't think there should be pressure on someone to lose weight for a dress, considering that there are so many options out there right now that cater to larger women (by so many, I mean a decent amount.) I think girls that have a bit more weight to themselves should stop thinking "this Angelic Pretty print is going to win me lolita points if I squeeze into it" and instead ask themselves "well, really cool companies do custom sizing" or "will that style and cut of brand dress even look good on me?"

[Anonymous No.7419369]

>>7419354
I'm not thinking of bobbysocks, and i have no idea where bobbysocks fits into this. Youre not supposed to fold the crew socks and she *is* wearing ankle socks. I own the same pair.

[Anonymous No.7419376]

>>7419369
Stop being such a cunt about 2 inches of socks.

Her outfit isn't lolita, it's sort of bad, and the socks don't look great on her. But those crew socks look stupid as hell, the shorter ones look much better on most people, because they don't stop and cut off 1/4 up the calf.

[Anonymous No.7419409]

>>7419207
Nope, she admitted to posting it herself.

[Anonymous No.7419422]

>>7419376
whoa whoa, didnt mean to rustle your jimmies so much over socks.

I agree her outfit isnt lolita, i think its really bad, but I do think that if she wore appropriate socks it would be a lot better because not as much leg would be exposed, because the two inches does make a big difference. Truth be told yes, generally, you do need long and skinny legs to work it.

Maybe this pair would be a better example, because the cinema doll ones are quite long.

But for the future, please refrain from unnecessary name-calling and drama. It starts a long line of shitposting if you cross somebody.

[Anonymous No.7419468]

>>7419369
....Yes, you are thinking of bobbysocks. Bobbysocks are the little anklesocks she's wearing with a ruffle or lace trim.

[Anonymous No.7419484]

>>7419329
brands make ankle socks, retard. I own a pair of btssb ankle socks.

[Anonymous No.7419511]

>>7419468
bobby socks are socks you fold.

>>7419484
That has nothing to do with being retarded. But excuse me, these are ankle socks. Pic related.

[Anonymous No.7419606]

>>7419511
Yeah, no. Those are more like liners, that you wear with flats to pad your feet and don't show.

[Anonymous No.7419613]

>>7418896
She's been dressing this way for a long time. She used to be lauded for her coordination skills. I disagreed.

http://daily-lolita.livejournal.com/?poster=phenphenny

[Anonymous No.7419634]

>>7419606
>that you wear with flats to pad your feet and don't show.
LOL WUT. No. Did you even look at the photo?

[Anonymous No.7419630]

>>7419613
Oh no, there's so much wasted wardrobe potential.

[Anonymous No.7419633]

>>7419613
What the fuck is this skirt.

[Anonymous No.7419639]

>>7419633
People must like her just because shes skinny and pretty. Which she is. But those coords, damn. Are just awful.

[Anonymous No.7419643]

>>7419613
Um.. I guess she's improved from this at least.

[Anonymous No.7419648]

>>7418803

How? Why?

[Anonymous No.7419659]

>>7419643
HAHAHAHA
oh god
looking at >>7419639 , make up can do wonders.

[Anonymous No.7419661]

>>7419639
I don't know, sometimes I think she's pretty and others I think her nose looks extremely phallic.

[Anonymous No.7419664]

>>7419661
>I think her nose looks extremely phallic.
YES. I was thinking this, actually.

[Anonymous No.7419671]

>>7419664
There's even a little indentation on the tip...

[Anonymous No.7419707]

>>7419634
>google 'liner socks'
>pic related

Are you through being a retard?

[Anonymous No.7419712]

>>7419707
>that you wear with flats
>and don't show

please show me how this would work with those socks

[Anonymous No.7419715]

>>7419707
Yeah, those are "no-show" socks. Ankle socks are the ones that come up and cover your ankle bone and then stop. Crew socks go up your calf 2-4 inches.

[Anonymous No.7419724]

>>7419715
>>7419712
>>7419707
>>7419606
>>7419511
Does it really matter what theyre called?

Her socks were too low, and >>7419422 >>7419484 are more lolita appropriate because they cover the ankle. Who gives a shit what theyre called.

[Anonymous No.7419732]

>>7419724
Her outfit isn't lolita in the first place. Why does it matter what kind of socks she's wearing when it's not lolita?

[Anonymous No.7419742]

>>7419732
fucking this

>>7419724
just stop replying. your shitposting isn't going anywhere. congrats on the thread derail.

[Anonymous No.7419743]

>>7419732
Because it was fucking posted as lolita? Same as any other shitty almost-ita outfit that gets posted here.

[Anonymous No.7419751]

>>7419732
Its not for the sake of lolita, its just an outfit being good or bad.

[Anonymous No.7419759]

>>7419751
But the height of her socks don't determine if her outfit is good or bad. Wearing a higher pair of socks would not have made her outfit good.

[Anonymous No.7419755]

>>7419742
>derailing
>nitpicking in a nitpick thread

ok

Fact is it's an outfit that was posted as lolita, which it isn't, and the discussion is about a specific aspect of why it isn't. Sorry you can't handle on topic posts!

[Anonymous No.7419773]

>>7419755
>"Nitpicking in Lolita" thread
>not even nitpicking a lolita outfit
>arguing over names of socks

you can stop shitposting now.

[Anonymous No.7419779]

>>7419759
but the topic was brought up that it looks like too much leg is exposed (in general), and that ankle/crew/short socks don't have a place in lolita [or related styles]. ( >>7418997 ).

Ankle sock argument ensued which was completely unnecessary. The conversation really should have just ended at >>7419422 .

[Anonymous No.7419798]

>>7419779
but they do have a place in lolita
here are pics from brand photoshoots, street snaps, and glbs
why is this even an argument

[Anonymous No.7419800]

Did anyone see the video lovelylor just posted?

For hot days in lolita, she suggested wearing a short sleeve blouse (the one she put in her video was cotton) or a PEIGNOIR instead of wearing a CHIFFON BLOUSE or bolero. A PEIGNOIR. WHY.

[Anonymous No.7419806]

>>7419798

[Anonymous No.7419809]

>>7419633
dat broken ankle

[Anonymous No.7419811]

>>7419806

[Anonymous No.7419815]

>>7419811

[Anonymous No.7419823]

As you can see here, it looks a lot better with her ankle completely covered >>7419798 >>7419806 than in >>7414882 where its only partially covered.

the extra inch of sock really does make a difference with lolita.

>>7419798
Thank you. That was all I was trying to say.

[Anonymous No.7419827]

>>7419815

[Anonymous No.7419833]

>>7419823
it doesn't look better with anything you dumb cunt her outfit sucks no matter how high her socks are and a decent actual lolita coord with those socks would still be ok for lolita

[Anonymous No.7419848]

>>7419823
...But the socks you were arguing were better are almost mid-calf??

>>7419833
And this...

[Anonymous No.7419862]

>>7419800
Because Cult Party Kei sneaking over into Lolita?
I think it's a cute fashion look sometimes BUT I wouldn't call it Lolita. I WOULD wear a thin lace bolero though as Lolita. Dotted Swiss, Point d'esprit, etc. and a the right sort of peignoir could be cut down to bolero size/shape. But as-is? No.

[Anonymous No.7419887]

>>7419833
Dude, calm down. Why are you so mad?

>>7419848
>.But the socks you were arguing were better are almost mid-calf??
So I corrected myself and said the chocolate rosette ones are a better example.

If this is samefag, please take a step away from your computer, you must be blind with rage. Anon, I'm going to stop responding to your shitposting now, okay? Bye bye.

[Anonymous No.7419890]

>>7419862
>Because Cult Party Kei sneaking over into Lolita?
pls. no. so often it just doesnt work with a peignoir.

>peignoir could be cut down to bolero size/shape. But as-is? No.
Well, yeah, but at that point its not even a peignoir anymore. but shes misguiding all the noobs to thinking peignoirs are a better option than a chiffon blouse, like, what the actual fuck.

[Anonymous No.7419895]

[Anonymous No.7419896]

Wow, I take a nap and anon goes batshit over socks.
How about 'I don't like these socks because (list reasons). Lots of things that I think look like shit ARE Lolita so 'ew not Rori', 'Yahuh, so Rori' always just ends up in a pile of poo unless it's a generally accepted faux pas (petticoat as a shawl, headbows upside down, etc.)

I always think people who hide behind (It's lolita/it's not lolita) have a weaker POV.

In this thread, it's ok to just say 'fuck those socks, I hate them!' And give the reasons you think they do not look good. Others can say why they disagree. Neither of the sides usually define Lolita.

Also...batshit brand stylists may use them tomorrow and lots of brand stuff is NOT Lolita.
Sheesh

[Anonymous No.7419906]

>>7419887
>anons don't agree with my autistic shitposting so they must be samefag!
>u mad!

Yes, it's time for you to leave, thanks.

[Anonymous No.7419907]

>>7419895
This photo is creepy and looks like it was taken in the back of a brothel.

[Anonymous No.7419911]

>>7419890
I didn't say it was correct, I don't think it is either. Just musing on the whys and wherefores. In the west, peignoirs even in CPK look like you raided your granny's closet because many of us are used to seeing that kind of stuff at thrift stores. In a Japan, I think it's more a novelty thing like Shriner fez or other lodge regalia and out-of-place medals in Dolly Kei. I don't think an unaltered peignoir is especially suited as a fashion statement in the west, period.

[Anonymous No.7419916]

>>7419907
Have you been watching the Lolita pornoZ, anon? It's ok, you can tell us, haha!

[Anonymous No.7419948]

>>7419329
Possibly my most hated lolita socks ever.

[Anonymous No.7419954]

>>7419823
I'm not seeing much of a difference, shut the hell up

[Anonymous No.7419955]

Holy shit, can we just get back to nitpicking? We have fresh meat >>7419895 enough with the fucking socks.

[Anonymous No.7419964]

>>7419895
That pose is shit

[Anonymous No.7419976]

>>7419633
Kawaii kuma-chan needs to go potty?

That's always what this pose reminds me of...

[Anonymous No.7419982]

Is that leggings with plain socks and Doc Martens...? Why???

[Anonymous No.7419984]

>>7419982
the doc martins trend needs to fucking die

[Anonymous No.7419986]

>>7419982
...twice. what the hell
>my thoughts while going through her tumblr

[Anonymous No.7419987]

>>7419982
I must admit, I do this kind of thing on casual days when I'm not wearing lolita, just brand pieces in a non lolita way. I would never mix those colors, ugh.

[Anonymous No.7419992]

>>7419986
>>7419982
since she did it twice for dif coords, it's probably more for the weather than the outfit
I've worn ful lolita with underarmor+jeans, don't hate

[Anonymous No.7419996]

>>7419986
>>7419992
But come on, I love that skirt, and she makes it look so... plain.

[Anonymous No.7419999]

>>7419996
when it's cold as balls you have to sacrifice some aspects of the outfit, anon.

[Anonymous No.7420017]

>>7419992
But you don't have to post it as a coordinate, which implies you think the outfit is good enough to share.

[Anonymous No.7420019]

>>7419986
The blouse is too saturated for the reds on the jsk. The flowers look really washed out

[Anonymous No.7420021]

>>7419982 >>7419986
I don't think there is anything wrong with dressing for the weather. What bothers me about this girl is she flaunts her plain outfits as 'boring kei' like it's a legitimate, good style. She has all this nice brand too, and she never really utilizes it. It's disappointing, since she has a good figure and vast closet by the looks of it.

[Anonymous No.7420024]

>>7419999
Or just choose a fitting outfit altogether.

[Anonymous No.7420025]

>>7419982
>>7419986
>>7419992
>>7419999

Little Neo Victorian flat boots would look so much better. These look too chunky, like work boots with the soles and that stitching.

[Anonymous No.7420031]

>>7420021
Are you thinking of wagamamajuliet/honeycruller? Or does this girl also peg it 'boring-kei' too now, god. Please don't tell me that's spreading.

[Anonymous No.7420032]

>>7420021
>>7420025
I agree, it just breaks with the style of the skirts/dresses.
Delicate print doesn't go with those tights and shoes.

[Anonymous No.7420036]

>>7419992
>>7419999
There are proper Lolita wintery boots and coats, capes, muffs, shawls neck wraps, wool berets and layered leg wear.
No excuse to be fugly in the cold or let non-lolita items show.
I assume people living in cold climates buy cold weather lolita gear. I live in a place that rarely gets down in the teens and I have warm winter lolita gear.

[Anonymous No.7420064]

>>7420031
They both do the boring kei thing. I've seen photos of them together. I think they're friends?

[Anonymous No.7420066]

>>7420064
It should be called lazy kei.

[Anonymous No.7420072]

>>7420021
Minus the socks/tights this looks just fine to me. Again ignoring the non matching tights it looks nice and put together even if it's not OTT or has a million layers

[Anonymous No.7420127]

>>7419986
I like it. Its casual and reminds me a little of mori. Its not normal but its still cute it an odd way. Like shes not trying to look elegant or anything, just frumpy and comfortable but still cute.

>>7420021
No. Fucking no. The socks. Why. Its a perfectly normal coord that could have been so much better.

[Anonymous No.7420130]

>>7420021
This is not a nitpick, this is actually ita. The Doc Marten outfits I could accept, but there ain't no way that print can be forced into morigirl type natural tones.

[Anonymous No.7420145]

>>7420064
Oh, that would explain a lot, actually...

[Anonymous No.7420150]

>>7419103
..Except she knows fluent Japanese and she went to Japan a lot a LONG time before she met her boyfriend?
Some of you guys are being assholes and just picking at a life and personality most of you know nothing about. I understand this is a nitpicking thread and such but why do you need to rag on her personally? Polite sage for faggotry.

[Anonymous No.7420169]

>>7420021
Is nobody going to mention how's she's wearing a black petticoat with a pastel skirt? Seriously?

[Anonymous No.7420170]

>>7420036
Please show me all the suitable lolita shit for -50 degree weather, that is on par or better than actual regular winter wear. Actually don't bother because spring is coming (for where I live I hope lol).
.
>>7420017
Well if the top half is good, then it'd be a hassle to make the bottom fit better, then you'd have to change back, etc.

>>7420024
If I did that I wouldn't have been able to wear lolita for the past 4 months.

Keep in mind I don't think the grey tights + doc martens look is good, but when it's fucking cold you just gotta do it sometimes.
>inb4 stop defending yourself

[Anonymous No.7420180]

>>7420169
I don't care about the color if the petti as long as I can't see it, so that's more the issue yeah..

[Anonymous No.7420194]

>>7420031
honeycruller rustles my jimmies. Remember when people were ragging on herajika and jarhundert for being ugly and wasting their brand? I thought those vendetta-chans were being idiotic until I came across honeycruller and raged because she had nice items but looked like utter shit. It also gets my goat that she posts nail polishes with her coordinates but when she posts worn pictures she is never wearing polish.

[Anonymous No.7420239]

>>7420150
Fucking this, man. People just love to make assumptions-- the worst possible assumptions. And then others believe it to be true, retell the story, and now its five times worse.

[Anonymous No.7420292]

>>7419099
We had a special needs girl at my elementary who would call boys she liked her "boyfran" so i cant take anyone who says it seriously

[Anonymous No.7420319]

>>7420194
jfc i can't even be jealous of her wardrobe because of how shitty she looks

[Anonymous No.7420376]

>>7420170
If it is that cold then there likely isn't any barring wearing a big loose hooded snowsuit over everything and donning your petti, hair accessories and suitable shoes once you reached your destination. Which is manageable.

But she is inside, not out in -50 weather.

[Anonymous No.7420380]

>>7420169
>>7420180
Of course it's best to never show it but often a tiny flash will show despite being careful.
Here, it shows so yes, it's an issue and fugly.

[Anonymous No.7420392]

>>7420319
who is this girl and where is she from...

[Anonymous No.7420395]

>>7418803
the chick who runs the axes femme tumblr? loli coords are hit-or-miss, with the striped stockings and exceedingly strange taste in prints/legwear

but her everyday liz lisa outfits are much better, she def has the legs for gyaru

[Anonymous No.7420409]

>>7419212
I generally really like Infiniteneeya, and in fact she's the only lolita that I regularly draw inspiration from. I personally enjoy things that don't exactly match, it seems more playful and natural to me.

But I do agree that this particular outfit doesn't work. I don't care about the pinks not matching, but there's just too many motifs going on. If she just changed the tights I'd feel a lot better about it.

[Anonymous No.7420428]

>>7419219
I laughed.
She may be trying to be 'quirky and you eel'
Not working.
She looks like a strawberry cat lady librarian.
The kind who would tell you about "Mr Whiskers" there on her badge.

[Anonymous No.7420431]

>>7419219 #
I laughed.
She may be trying to be 'quirky and youneek'
Not working.
She looks like a strawberry cat lady librarian.
The kind who would tell you about "Mr Whiskers there on her badge every time you came in.

[Anonymous No.7420597]

>>7420409
> I personally enjoy things that don't exactly match, it seems more playful and natural to me.
This. Her outfits look more fashion than costume, and I admire that a lot.

[Anonymous No.7420647]

>>7419806
This is such an ita fucking coord coming from a brand. The only elements that save it from being called out are the super saturated filter and the fact that the model's a Jap.

[Anonymous No.7420652]

>>7418705
what is that dress, is it even a dress?

[Anonymous No.7420654]

>>7419982
Whats that symbol on her face

[Anonymous No.7420679]

>>7420654
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laughing_Man_(Ghost_in_the_Shell)

[Anonymous No.7420694]

>>7415587
girl desperately needs a hamburger

[Anonymous No.7420730]

>>7420392
Wagamamajuliet/honey-cruller

[Anonymous No.7420732]

>>7420730
i asked where is she from, because she looks like my exclassmate.

[Anonymous No.7420742]

>>7420732
Wagamamajuliet is from Canada iirc.

[Anonymous No.7420757]

>>7420742
>>7420732

[Anonymous No.7420810]

>keep checking here to see if I get posted
>every time phew.jpg
>not (in)famous enough to make a 'meh' impression on seagulls

Thankfully.

Maybe I'll post when I'm braver and not dying from stress.

[Anonymous No.7420844]

>>7420647
And what exactly is so ita about it? I think the shoes are too bright but that could be the lighting. And the socks are fine, but I think they would look better with stockings underneath. But that's just personal preference and doesn't make anything ita.

[Anonymous No.7420845]

>>7419982
>>7419986
>>7420021

Surprised at the negative opinions cause I actually like her coords! I'd look terrible in docs etc and its not typical Lolita but I think she pulls it off..?

[Anonymous No.7420847]

>>7420845
Nobody pulls off docs in lolita

[Anonymous No.7420854]

>>7420647
HOW FUCKING DARE AP show off all the items in their set for a photoshoot advertising the series. Jesus fucking christ. Such boring brand coordinates need to stop. They bore me to tears. ablublu

[Anonymous No.7420875]

>>7420810
Same here, anon.

One on hand though I'd appreciate some concrit. On the other hand I'm afraid of being torn apart from head to toe because I know my coords are pretty simple.

[Anonymous No.7420894]

I've never been able to understand why this girl talks like she knows everything about Lolita and then goes out wearing this.

[Anonymous No.7420918]

>>7420894
Well, at least her colours match pretty well.

[Anonymous No.7420934]

>>7420810
Same, this and the ita thread. I have a vendetta-chan who posts me sometimes (and not even my worst of the worst coords, which is confusing - just my more recent, competent stuff) and I feel like I have to stay ever vigilant.

[Anonymous No.7420948]

>>7420894
There is a thing called casual lolita....
I think it matches pretty well. just a different top and it would be a good coord.

[Anonymous No.7420957]

>>7420948
>>7420918
You can't wear a fucking plain camisole as the main shirt it looks awful. The bolero is plain and the cami straps are showing her headband looks like a childs, the flower is stuffed like a plushie. Pretty much the only thing loli about this is the skirt.

[Anonymous No.7420959]

>>7420934
Are you fugly hipster glasses-chan?

[Anonymous No.7420964]

>>7420959
No lol, I'm a nobody. I get posted like once a month or less and every time people are like "so and so is a bit off but I don't think this is ita". Like I said, it's weird. I have some fuckawful attempts from when I was first starting and those never get posted, only recent stuff.

Are you talking about Kate Davis? She's annoying. "lolololol i trol u xD" not really bitch, you're the one who looks like crap.

[Anonymous No.7420968]

>>7420964
god i hate that chick
i heard she's finally getting some thin brown wire frames. about damn time. her mediocre coords + hipster glasses ruin everything she posts for me.

[Anonymous No.7420970]

>>7420948
No, it's terrible.
I feel like she lurks this board and stealth-defends herself.
The least she could've done was either get a pink blouse or try harder to cover those spaghetti straps.

[Anonymous No.7420971]

>>7420957
>just a different top and it would be a good coord
calm your tits, anon
also, what are fuzzy hair stars? they're pretty common in sweet. its hardly an irredeemable coord.

[Anonymous No.7420973]

>>7420964
I was talking about her, but I know she's shit, you did kind of say something like I'd imagine her saying though which is why I asked. I want to smack those glasses right off her face.

Speaking of, why do all the FB group mods look like total trash?

[Anonymous No.7420978]

>>7420971
Aren't fuzzy hair stars more common in OTT sweet or fairy kei? Why wear one with such a casual coord? It doesn't match and it doesn't look good.

Her socks and shoes are awful too. I don't care if the colors match.

[Anonymous No.7420979]

>>7420918
>>7420948
>>7420971
>someone actually defending this piece of trash

[Anonymous No.7420984]

>>7420971
I doesn't look like a fuzzy star, it looks like one of those flower washing towels/sponges, pic related(which is ironic since she's on the damn bathroom sink.

[Anonymous No.7420990]

>>7420971
>>7420971
If this is a fuzzy star it makes it even worse. There is no place for stars in this poor excuse for a coord. Poormans lolita, walmart normalfag cami and bolero, payless shoes and ankle socks with ~handsewn plastic lace~ plus the headband looks like the kind for a baby.

[Anonymous No.7420993]

>>7420810
>>7420875
>>7420934
What kind of a fashion masochist posts themselves to a nitpick thread?!? Unless you WANT to be harshly nitpicked? People are going to tell you what they do not like about your coord, not necessarily what is wrong with it or what could be improved.

So far, most of what isn't liked are things that could be improved but there's no guarantee someone won't just go off about your socks. Why not post in the coord thread?

[Anonymous No.7420995]

>>7420978
>>7420990

This is actually something I want to nitpick about. I really hate when people especially in OTT coords just throw on a bunch of random accessories that don't match the theme. Even in regular sweet coords there is some out of place fuzzy stars for no reason at all.

[Anonymous No.7421025]

>>7420894
Bodyline skirt + loliables? Nope.
Casual works with pretty brand cutsews but I think it's one of the easiest to mess up or do poorly.

The socks and shrug/bolero thingie are too small/short. Hair accessory (whatever it is) is too busy for casual look. Shoes too dressy for casual coordinate.
Too much skin showing overall. Arms OR legs OR décolletage not all three, even in ero.

Also clean your mirror if you really must take bathroom selfies, I thought you were wearing polka-dot tights.

[Anonymous No.7421056]

A wild Rabbit appears!

Actually, I picked the <best> of what she tagged lolita.

[Anonymous No.7421059]

>>7421056
now THIS belongs in the ita thread. christ.

[Anonymous No.7421062]

>>7421056
The only things that match in this entire outfit are her shoes and her hair.

[Anonymous No.7421070]

I don't like her corset or headband, something about the whole outfit just seems really off to me.

[Anonymous No.7421078]

>>7421070
imo, it's probably the corset, it just doesn't belong. She'd have done better with a wide leather belt if she needed waist definition.

[Anonymous No.7421083]

>>7421070
What I notice first is that the blouse is too small, the sleeves are skewed up into her armpits on the undersides.

[Drawthread No.7421085]

>>7421070
Her shoes and blouse are too plain for the corset and print. With a nice bolero and fancier shoes it wouldn't look half bad.

[Anonymous No.7421110]

>>7419982
This is amazing. Looks very much like 80s goth influences with that morbid crucifixion imagery and boots. Sometimes it works to go out of the box you sandy cunts.

[Anonymous No.7421144]

>>7420993
...no one said they were posting themselves, dumbshit. They said they were worried they would be posted, by someone else.

[Anonymous No.7421162]

>>7421056
That hem D:

[Anonymous No.7421173]

Hey, does anyone have any suggestions for an ita shirt shop to order from that would arrive in America in under 10 days?

[Anonymous No.7421238]

>>7421144
>Maybe I'll post when I'm braver and not dying from stress.

[Anonymous No.7421246]

>>7421110
It's a nitpick thread, some people don't like it.
You are nitpicking the nitpickers in a nitpick thread.
Who is the sandy one?

[Anonymous No.7421331]

>>7419895
Am I the only one who thinks something about the bolero+long sleeved blouse looks off?

[Anonymous No.7421359]

>>7421056
That actually is the best I have seen her look.

[Anonymous No.7421362]

>>7421173

Hot Topic? F21? Thrift shops? Walmart?

Like seriously just grab a non loliable blouse and call it a day. Add lots of shitty lace if you feel like it. Hot glue the motherfucker if you're ambitious.

[Anonymous No.7421367]

>>7420894
this is ita.

[Anonymous No.7421374]

>>7421359
Yep, I chose the best, as I said but even then, it's more than questionable.

[Anonymous No.7421378]

>>7421173
Why do you want an ita blouse?

[Anonymous No.7421469]

>>7420597
Even for fashion, the outfit that was posted here looks like a big mess to me.

[Anonymous No.7421470]

>>7421110
mte. Thank you.

[Anonymous No.7421472]

>>7420845
It's not like she looks bad, she just makes the brand items in these outfits look really underwhelming.

[Anonymous No.7421475]

>>7420409
agreed with everything you said. She's ideal for wearing lolita in a daily way

[Anonymous No.7421480]

>>7420934
1. Having a vendetta-chan is an honor
2. When people are nitpicking on the internet, you can't take this too seriously.

[Anonymous No.7421492]

Whatever happened to this special little batflake 'designer'?

[Anonymous No.7421508]

New thread >>7421505

[Anonymous No.7421537]

>>7421070
>>7421078
>>7421083
I think a bolero or a blouse with longer sleeves and some frill at the top would improve this. Also, fancier shoes. And a better petti.

[Anonymous No.7423080]

>>7421110
What the fuck is 80's goth about this? It's docs with a dress that doesn't suit them at all and a bunch of mismatched accessories. Nothing is cohesive.

[Anonymous No.7423666]

>>7421056
i glanced at the thumbnail and thought she was wearing an umbrella as a skirt hahahaha

ugh too many colors though. nothing matches the purple on her tights, and the deep burgundy and bright reds look like vomit together