Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 540 KB, 1071x1920, 1432854234010.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8364158 No.8364158 [Reply] [Original] [rbt]

post itas, post coords that are horribly clashy

>> No.8364186

>>8364158
I don't hate this girl but her makeup/expressions are always so unflattering.

>> No.8364202
File: 703 KB, 1280x1707, https%3A%2F%2F36.media.tumblr.com%2Fa563293b51838759e298079f47cf4440%2Ftumblr_mnr1kpwCx31r8lh5wo3_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8364202

>>8364186
And her coords are tacky and clashy most of the time. As a person she seems nice though. I wish she dressed better

>> No.8364220

>>8364202
Why is her bag doing that to her dress? Bad petti or?

>> No.8364224

>>8364220
I think the bag is too heavy and the strap is too long.

>> No.8364253
File: 104 KB, 640x640, https%3A%2F%2F40.media.tumblr.com%2F39f970966849dcbcf3156903e05ef87b%2Ftumblr_noyubf8gVK1qbu8k3o1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8364253

"lolita"

>> No.8364332
File: 421 KB, 507x400, nevermindpunk.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8364332

>> No.8364424

>>8364332
never mind is right
i looked at the thumbnail and was like "this doesn't look so bad"
then
"nvm"

>> No.8364435
File: 597 KB, 1541x1920, mar-and-liz-as-manga-fairies.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8364435

>>8364332

>> No.8364442
File: 124 KB, 640x960, 11174663_824524670968821_4480958812032486113_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8364442

>>8364435

>> No.8364515

>>8364253
Saw this chick and her friend everywhere in the lolita and mcm tags. It's not even ero

>> No.8364551

>>8364435
mfw I know exactly where this is and exactly what convention it was at

>> No.8364596

>>8364551
Me too, anon, me too.

>> No.8364624
File: 68 KB, 410x569, 2NKqNVXUwBDikj1EkC8XXo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8364624

I can't believe this ita was actually asking if she could give lolita advice to random congoers. Amazing.

>> No.8364633

>>8364442
Looks like a southern belle costume

>> No.8364640

>>8364624
top kek

>> No.8364685

>>8364624
Did she actually wear that in public

>> No.8364719

>>8364624
why doesn't this surprise me? there are always itas and newbies who are trying to overcompensate and show off their superior knowledge.

>> No.8364726

>>8364719
We should give this condition a name
Ita-complex or something

>> No.8364812

>>8364624
The lacing front cardigan. If done correctly could be interesting for punk lolita.

>> No.8364833
File: 291 KB, 616x960, ITA3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8364833

>>8364719
>>8364726
In a similar way, why is it always the shitty handmade itas that post tutorials, not the good handmade lolitas?

There is one girl in my comm who hand makes stuff. I wont post her here though because the truth of the matter is that when people get posted here one of two things happens. They improve or they quit.

Because I'm a cunt I don't want either to happen. She is a valuable source of laughter to me.

Also my contribution.

>> No.8365026
File: 613 KB, 740x856, Screen Shot 2015-05-30 at 12.50.35 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8365026

This girl makes me really, unnecessarily angry with her poor coordinating skills.

>> No.8365029
File: 969 KB, 758x994, Screen Shot 2015-05-30 at 12.50.47 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8365029

>>8365026

>> No.8365032
File: 154 KB, 639x920, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8365032

No. No you did not

>> No.8365035

>>8365029
At least she's cute tho. Coordinating skills come with time.

>> No.8365037
File: 937 KB, 812x1182, Screen Shot 2015-05-30 at 12.51.15 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8365037

>>8365029

>> No.8365044

>>8365035
She used to have "lolita expert" in her profile on tumblr. She has been wearing lolita for a long time. Her outfits outside lolita are bad, too.

>> No.8365046

>>8365032
Is that the girl who did the als ice bucket challenge in "lolita cosplay??"

>> No.8365048

>>8365029
>>8365037
This seems like a nitpick. The only potential issue I see is headwear.

I really hope people don't think simple = ita

>> No.8365050

>>8364833
This is cute. What's wrong with it?

>> No.8365051

>>8365037
How is this ita?

>> No.8365053

>>8365048
1)
- No leg wear
- Weird lack of floof
- Too few accessories
- Shoes that don't match
- Weird mini top hat that also doesn't match
2)
- Unmatched hair accessory
- Frizzy hair
- Random shawl thing

Admittedly, the second is better than the first and not "ita," but still not great. First is ita all the way.

>> No.8365063
File: 369 KB, 457x795, tumblr_noxxljqL5T1u45l34o1_540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8365063

>> No.8365065

>>8364624
I wonder if you're Brittany or Linda

You all were being kind of tacky in that RC:U thread. After you guys dogpiled her she said she wouldn't try to "correct" itas and didnt say anything after that on the matter

Also I don't think she has posted this anywhere as lolita? This was from her personal fb page, yes? So she could be going for punk or something.

>> No.8365067

>>8365026
Isn't this the girl who had an inappropriate relationship with that tumblr feminist guy?

>> No.8365075
File: 46 KB, 431x767, pY9qkwk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8365075

thought I'd share my first attempt lolita attempt from several years ago because it's pretty dumpy.

>> No.8365095

>>8365075
Thank you for sharing and thank you for realizing your mistakes

>> No.8365098

>>8365075
Sorry, OP, but I have to agree that this is pretty bad. But hey! At least you know that.

>> No.8365102
File: 751 KB, 1507x768, altered.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8365102

>>8364442
Found it, but the sleeves are clearly altered and I have no idea what that white petti thing is.

>> No.8365104

>>8365098
lmao no need to be sorry, thankfully this is the only picture I have of this disaster. you live you learn

>> No.8365130

>>8365037
This is beautiful. Do you not like the shawl?

>> No.8365142

>>8364435
That file name makes me want to puke

>> No.8365152

>>8365142
lol the fuck are manga fairys

>> No.8365169

>>8364442
Why is it always theses types? I've noticed this before that you don't see any other type of female who dresses in awful "victorian" clothes that doesn't look exactly like this. Why is this? Why are they all makeup-hating, glasses-wearing, long-haired older women? This is has been the weirdest phenomenon I've noticed for years and nobody has ever pointed it out.

>> No.8365172

>>8365050
They're just severely lacking in their hairstyle and makeup, otherwise it's really not bad.

>> No.8365173

>>8364833
Please someone burn that felt hat before it gets any bigger amd eats her

>> No.8365181

>>8365169
Because the older you get the more feel you have that you can only ever from now on look cute as an old fashioned southern belle? That or dressing as steampunk crap. I think its a middle aged woman thing.

>> No.8365183
File: 399 KB, 245x205, sleepnap.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8365183

>>8365181
>notices how I worded it
>holy shit

I should probably sleep now.

>> No.8365212

>>8365037
This is at least nitpick level, anon. Not ita.

>> No.8365243

>>8365169
>makeup-hating
likely because back then people didn't wear makeup (aside from hookers)

>> No.8365494

>>8364332
What? I think this is an awesome punk coord.

>> No.8365509

>>8364332
Oh god I could tell straight away from the boots that this was Victoria Suzanne Wendy Moira Angela Delicatessa Windowshade Macrame Alice.

Pink "Docs" and those rainbow fucking Reeboks she'd wear. Crimes against lolita footwear.

>> No.8365514

>>8365169
For what it's worth, I've seen an awful lot of younger girls (early 20's) look homely as fuck. Lighting can do a lot to make your face look lumpy and older, especially without makeup and with wire framed old lady glasses. Sometimes something as simple as changing the way you smile and photos can make all the difference. This looks like the contrast and brightness was amped up, making areas of her face look deeper than they probably actually are. Not defending her or anything, I'm just saying it's something I've noticed even with my own photos.

>> No.8365533
File: 75 KB, 500x351, tumblr_mjpwi4Y9wa1rmxhcfo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8365533

>>8365032
reminds me of attached
sage because off topic

>> No.8365538

>>8365169
because it's "true victorian"
agrred, the girl does look pretty bad
why don't these fashion shows have some kind of screening? i've seen so many bad photos from this specific show

>> No.8365573

>>8365509
Nice Pippi reference, I smiled.

>> No.8365609
File: 112 KB, 500x751, tumblr_np4ofeLAzF1uvx212o1_540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8365609

>>8365533
i definitely read that as "sage for hot topic" at first
>why not both

>> No.8365610

>>8365102
>sleeves are clearly altered
Nah, they probably came like that. It's milanoo.

>> No.8365611

>>8365609
I did too anon

>> No.8365615

>>8365053
I'd say even first is borderline nitpick. "Too few accessories" and low poof are subjective and also part of basic coords. If she used a bag that matched the shoes, they'd be fine. However, she would definitely benefit from a better-shaped petti and some legwear, and the top hat needs to go.
The second isn't even bad, just basic with not very good hair/makeup.
If you're going to get your knickers in a twist, do it over a real ita.

>> No.8365670

>>8365172
Nitpick. Better suited for other threads.

>> No.8365848

>>8365615
If you think the first is nitpick, then I think there might be something wrong with your taste level. Second is definitely nitpick.

>> No.8365874
File: 104 KB, 720x960, why.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8365874

>> No.8365879

>>8365874
i hate when pieces with shit fabric have good construction
>dem sad bows tho

>> No.8365887

>>8364442
I keep seeing photos of weird fashion with this background. Was this some specific event?

>> No.8365935

>>8365874
That eyeliner makes me want to throw up

>> No.8365937
File: 95 KB, 528x960, 1545760_10155608305555150_6450395414554002497_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8365937

>> No.8365938

>>8365937
is that dress even made for lolita?

>> No.8365956

>>8365938
By the looks, it seems like a dress from Kawaii goods which is not made for Lolita.

>> No.8365961

>>8365956
It looks like a skater dress. I don't understand why people think the skater cut (skirt or dress) is appropriate for lolita

>> No.8365964

>>8365874
If the bows were better made, I could honestly mistake this for a Meta monstrosity.

>> No.8365968

>>8365961
They're more for fairy kei aren't they? Or pop kei depending on color I guess? Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

Also would it be awful to wear a petticoat under a skater cut dress and not call it lolita? They look like they should have a tiny bit more poof than they come with.

>> No.8365991
File: 132 KB, 640x960, 11169631_824524827635472_7728887288385679554_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8365991

>>8365887

I think it was The cherry Blossom Festival in Brooklyn

>> No.8366016

>>8365937
This wasn't intended to be lolita - iirc she posted it in the Decora and Fairy Kei International Facebook group. I don't think it's fair to critisise her based on how lolita it does or doesn't look as it was never intended to be that in the first place.

>> No.8366030

>>8366016
well regardless of what she's going for, she missed the mark. The dress may be fairy-kei ish, but nothing else is.

>> No.8366034

>>8365075
I kind of love seeing ita baby pics, it can really show growth! also I'm feeling that skirt.

>> No.8366039

>>8365937
Omg her tits look bigger than her head

>> No.8366044

>>8365937
She needs to talk to her doctor about getting a breast reduction, my back is hurting just looking at this

>> No.8366067

>>8365494
I agree with you anon. I think that even though her outfit doesn't fit the fashion, there's nothing inherently wrong about the way she combined the pieces. She looks okay, just not lolita

>> No.8366068

>>8365991

I think this one is fun and interesting to look at, but should never be mistaken for lolita. It's like a detailed and well-done cosplay for a tacky anime con mascot I haven't seen before.

>> No.8366072

>>8364624
if this wasn't posted as lolita, then there's nothing wrong with it. She looks cute.

>> No.8366199

>>8364158
>>8364202
sometimes I think I'm ugly but then I look at pictures of this woman and realise things aren't so bad.

>> No.8366206

>>8365991
I actually like this, not as lolita of course, but i like how it's constructed.

>> No.8366209

>>8366044
She wants one.

>> No.8366211
File: 670 KB, 1280x1707, tumblr_nokv6d9HYZ1qi1nsyo2_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8366211

looks like she's about to pop

>> No.8366214

>>8366211
Oh great, youre back again

Not ita. Nitpick at worst

>> No.8366221

>>8366214
I'm back again? what does that even mean?

This girl is clearly too fat for the dress and what is happening with that underskirt. If that's what you call a nitpick you must be new

>> No.8366223

>>8366214
Ugly wig
Visible failing bra
Terrible underskirt
Non matching shoes
Dress doesn't fit

Even if you leave out the fact she doesn't have a neck and looks like Mrs Potato Head in the face, this is much worse then a nitpick.

>> No.8366224

>>8366221
There is someone who has been posting this girl in like nearly every ita thread for ages now when she isn't ita, just fat. Thought you might be them.

I don't know what you are talking about in regards to her underskirt? She is holding out the dress, but not the underskirt, so the underskirt is laying flat. Mystery solved.

>> No.8366230

>>8366221
She probably things you're a repeat vendetta chan. He boobs aren't completely squished out of shape and I like the dress on her- it's just the saggy underskirts that are a problem, though she probably wore them to hide less than slender legs. Nitpick. This isn't a catastrophic clusterfuck of not-lolita

>> No.8366234

>>8366223
Wig is fine
Is that a bra strap or a JSK strap? Also are you seriously trying to imply she walked around all day like that and made no attempts to fix her bra strap showing (if that's what that is)?
Underskirt is fine >>8366224
She could add more gold in her coord in regards to the shoes but they arent mis-matched. There could be gold in the print (not familiar with it).
Yea the dress doesn't fit well but that doesn't make her an ita.

>> No.8366243

>>8366224
>She is holding out the dress, but not the underskirt, so the underskirt is laying flat. Mystery solved.
Not the other anon but I think that makes it look ugly as fuck so don't do that?? Like duh, quit being a fucking ita.
Also that white gap looking thing on her shoulder wtf. There are plenty of fat lolitas that don't look this trashy.

>> No.8366245

>>8366234
I don't think those are straps at all, I think it's the way the blouse is sewn if you look at both shoulders.

>> No.8366276

>>8366243
I think that white thing on her shoulder is a bag strap. Which means she has a white bag with a black coord and gold shoes. Also, she probably would look better without those underskirts, even if she has fat calves.

It doesn't look good, but it's not an ita material either.

>> No.8366281

man, whenever i see these threads i worry my lazy/casual coords will get posted. So many of my daily outfits are borderline/nitpicky like >>8366211 or >>8364833

>feels bad man

polite sage for OT

>> No.8366341
File: 250 KB, 226x593, asdfioeqkqland.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8366341

>>8366276
Its a gold bag, that's the handle on her shoulder not a bra strap, and her underskirt was just slipping down in front and needed to be pulled up. The print does have gold in it. Cropped the other people out of this photo because no need to bring them into this mess.

>> No.8366369

>>8366281
I'm with you, people ripping this girl apart and half of what they are picking on is wrong anyway (white bag, bra strap). >>8366341 looks cute especially for a plus size girl.

>> No.8366375

>>8366211
>>8366223
Nothing really screams "ITAII" about this coord. If she was thin...I don't think you'd be complaining this much.

>> No.8366392

>>8366039
I spat my drink on the screen anon

>> No.8366394

>>8366044
She should consider losing a little weight before going through with that

Like not even saying that in a lol fatty way

>> No.8366396

>>8366341
underskirt is sitting weird - why is it longer in front.
idk I'm sure this girl is nice but she could dress better.

>> No.8366412

>>8366211
Man, you cannot let this go. You might break the record for longest standing vendetta on /cgl/

>> No.8366417

>>8366394
They tell everyone to lose weight before reduction surgery because they want the skin to be looser on the breasts so they can staple and stitch it up with out have to worry about the sutures ripping.

>> No.8366434

>>8366396
>her underskirt was just slipping down in front and needed to be pulled up

I'm sure you're nice but you could read better

>> No.8366443

>>8366211
are you the same anon that posted about how big tittied girls in your comm enrage you

>> No.8366449

>>8365874
So close and yet so far away. Needs better makeup, lose tacky wig, wishing the print was something less busy/jarring, and get a proper blouse.

>> No.8366473

>>8365538
because at fashion shows for public events like this (japanese festivals) they dont want to lose business or get any sort of bad rep. a lot of these festivals and figured out they can milk money out of weebs that go to the event; if they were to reject people based on appearance i could imagine there would be all sorts of uproar from butthurt rejects. as to whether or not it would actually affect attendance or the name of the festival, i doubt it, but i could see the people organizing it not really wanting to start something, especially if it's smaller. perhaps if the festivals grow larger they would be able to have more of a screening/selection process, but i also think the biggest thing is the people that suggest a cosplay/lolita fashion show a these festivals don't know a whole lot about it themselves or if they do, they don't really care that much since it's just supposed to be some fun festival.

i would agree that they there should be a nicer screening process but idk, i also feel like, it's technically not really an event for cosplay and lolita anyway (even if it is a cultural festival and those two things are technically related to the pop culture of japan) so it's like....i don't go there expecting to see amazing cosplays and lolita coords anyway, know what i mean? a comm-hosted fashion show at a convention, now that i definitely expect to see some quality control in what coords are shown off just by nature of the event.

>> No.8366801
File: 43 KB, 600x600, 11267881_10152981698278507_7859977075403560124_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8366801

from CoF

>> No.8366838

>>8365509
>Victoria Suzanne Wendy Moira Angela Delicatessa Windowshade Macrame Alice

I'm fucking dying here.

>> No.8366861

>>8365533
I'm like 80% sure that's the "joke" she was trying to make.

>>8365609
For being Hot Topic* this is actually not awful

>> No.8366867

>>8366801
When I saw it, I was going to give her some concrit, but then I remembered her BtB blow-up, in which she decided every negative comment about the coord was actually a personal attack on her weight.

>> No.8366882
File: 1.67 MB, 500x282, eventhenotion.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8366882

>>8365874

>> No.8366904

>>8365609
I-I actually love this. It's what I always wanted from bittersweet or pastel goth.

>> No.8366929
File: 380 KB, 428x759, unnamed.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8366929

>> No.8366931
File: 299 KB, 428x759, unnamed (1).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8366931

>>8366929

>> No.8366933
File: 325 KB, 428x759, unnamed (4).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8366933

>>8366931

>> No.8366935
File: 319 KB, 428x759, unnamed (6).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8366935

>>8366933

>> No.8366938
File: 416 KB, 428x759, unnamed (7).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8366938

>>8366935

>> No.8366947

>>8366223
>Ugly wig
matter of taste but I see nothing wrong here

>Visible failing bra
Do you need glasses? That is clearly a strap of a bag/camera

>Terrible underskirt
again a matter of taste, it is a current trend so get over it

>Non matching shoes
print has some gold in it, like the brand name and the border tassles on the flags

>Dress doesn't fit
here I agree with you

This is clearly a nitpick.

>> No.8366958

>>8366861
>>8366904

yeah i knew it wasn't super horrible, i just wanted to contribute something besides "hur durr i found a pun"

>> No.8366960
File: 276 KB, 428x759, unnamed (8).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8366960

>>8366938

>> No.8366966

>>8366801
What a mess...

>> No.8366970

>>8366929
Mexi-lolita

>> No.8366974

>>8366434
No, pull your shit up of its falling. You know why it's falling tho? Cause of her fucking fat saggyness causing clothes not to fit right. Fat people are always adjusting their clothes cause nothing fits them properly cause it's always sliding around. I rarely see skinny people do this.

>> No.8366976

>>8366801
Why does she think this garbage looks like Lolita at all? I'm not a thin person, but fucking hell; if you're this big, just wait a bit until you can lose some weight. If your shape is "beach ball", you're just not cut out for this fashion.

>> No.8366978

>>8366976
She could have at least worn a wig.

>> No.8366979

>>8366801
I feel like if she put on a wig and some flower clips or something it wouldn't be *as* bad.. I mean yes it would still be iffy but it would definitely be a bit more fitting. That dress is unsalvageable though, maybe it would look better if it wasn't so highlighter pink. This isn't disgusting though considering how big she is-- there's definitely been worse.

>> No.8366990

>>8366801
Look how far she's come though! She's still terrible, but less terrible than when she started?

>> No.8366997
File: 345 KB, 428x759, unnamed (9).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8366997

>>8366960

>> No.8366998
File: 231 KB, 428x759, unnamed (11).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8366998

>>8366997

>> No.8367002

>>8366947
by terrible underskirt I'm also pretty sure they mean that it's sitting very oddly. look at it from >>8366341 . that's not really how underskirts are supposed to fall - seems like she may have it pulled up too high on her waist?

also even though there's some gold in the print I'm not sure if there's enough in there to justify gold shoes. however, I think I wouldn't mind the gold shoes if she wore lighter legwear. personally I'm not a fan of light shoes with dark(er) legwear, though I suppose that's also a matter of taste.

>> No.8367003

>>8366801
This would be much improved if she wore a babyydoll cut, imo.

>> No.8367004

>>8366998
sweet jesus. is this what those people see when they think we're hookers?
cause she really looks like some kinda crazy pilgrim hooker.

>> No.8367009
File: 292 KB, 428x759, unnamed (12).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367009

>>8366998

>> No.8367010
File: 358 KB, 428x759, unnamed (13).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367010

>>8367009
My favorite

>> No.8367011

>>8367009
that pose......oh honey

>> No.8367016
File: 36 KB, 524x468, 1432000820441.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367016

>>8366997
>"aww that coord looks kind of cute"
>sees fullres

>> No.8367017
File: 907 KB, 1365x2048, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367017

>>8365991
You are correct.
If you can find a video or pictures of the whole group the "Lolita fashion show" was more of a "brandwhores without the ability to coordinate show"
Here have another.

>> No.8367032

>>8366997
I don't understand what's wrong with this one though? Yeah her boyfriend looks like he looked into the sun but what's wrong here?

>> No.8367037

>>8367017
jfc dont they realize dresses like this just make you look fatter

>> No.8367081

>>8367032
It's the length of the dress and the leg avenue socks that are really throwing me off

Like I guess that could be more nitpick than ita

>> No.8367094

>>8366974
It's actually falling off her because it's too big, because she lost weight. You've had this vendetta for years. You need to get over it. You're so mad that you can't even type properly.

>> No.8367095

>>8367002
It's the socks that came with the dress. It's a set. The socks have more gold on them than the dress.

>> No.8367097

>>8367094
"lost weight"

>> No.8367107

>>8367095
>>8367094
Stop whiteknighting your fat ugly friend
She's too much of a whale for lolita and she looks like shrek

>> No.8367109

>>8366974
you sound like a very pleasant person anon

>> No.8367110

>>8367097
>>8367107
You really should go see a doctor for all that sand in your vagina instead of shitting up the thread with your vendetta.
She doesn't look good, but she is definitely not ita-level.

>> No.8367113

>>8367094
Yeah. I'm sure that's the reason she looks like shit.

Not even mad; but you can't call an orange if it's clearly a banana.

>> No.8367118
File: 40 KB, 640x480, no.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367118

>http://www.cosplay.com/showthread.php?t=165642
>"Is this Lolita?"
The entire thread

>> No.8367134

>>8367107
lol you are so fucking mad

>> No.8367201
File: 78 KB, 426x640, 15_5_31_322_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367201

???
http://www.closetchildonlineshop.com/product/79311

>> No.8367202
File: 77 KB, 540x960, 10409616_10153929616929741_979959131140780681_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367202

okay before anyone gets up in arms, i saw these on facebook so they werent tagged as lolita incase its jfashion nitpick

>> No.8367204
File: 64 KB, 540x960, 11065870_10153929616139741_6050001690580194097_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367204

>>8367202
Rule of three?
>wtf is on her waist
>shoes and blouse two differnt pinks
>silver star?

>> No.8367208
File: 101 KB, 540x960, 11329746_10153929612709741_2298379314549137834_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367208

>>8367204
Actually i realize theres more then just those three like her shitty bow and so loli kandi

>> No.8367209
File: 100 KB, 540x960, a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367209

>>8367208


Maybe this is fairy kei?

>> No.8367216

>>8367204
This is nitpick anon.
Sometimes it feels like rule of three is made up by anons that want an excuse to post their vendettas

>> No.8367254

>>8366929
Love the shoes on the left one.

>> No.8367318

>>8367216
Theres more then just that three....Brown purse or jacket plus the strap, polka dot bow? with boat? print dress.

I guess its a nitpick though

>> No.8367380

>>8366281
>>8366369
I fail to see how you don't think this is not an eyesore. I get simple coords, those are beautiful and elegant. But this...

>not matching reds
>ugly hat that doesn't fit the aesthetic or what ever theme she is trying to go for.
>Mangy unkempt hair
>gross skin
>unbalanced colours
>mixing sweet and gothic (military with that hat?) unsuccessfully
>That ugly cheap ill fitting blouse
>stockings that don't match her skin tone
>dress is too short
>awkward posture

I mean really... simple =/= this mismatched mess.

>> No.8367421

>>8367216
This is really not a nitpick. Every thing needs to be changed up since nothing matches. If you need to change more than 3 major things, its Ita.

>> No.8367480

>>8367421
The rule of 3 doesn't fucking exist

>> No.8367522

>>8366396
She probably has a large butt that causes the back to be higher

>> No.8367527

>>8367017
When your stomach pokes out further than your petti you're doing it wrong

>> No.8367544
File: 267 KB, 540x810, tumblr_np4d49cBJr1qadi4fo1_540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367544

>> No.8367548

>>8367544
Was this tagged as lolita? Looks like typical hipster garbage but with poof

>> No.8367553
File: 114 KB, 482x261, tags.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367553

>>8367548
Wouldn't have posted it otherwise

>> No.8367555

>>8367109
I know you're being sarcastic but you're right, I'm really not but I'm just being honest. I see fat people all day everyday in my work. You know what they do the most? They pull their pants up or out because it's getting all caught in their fat folds. Or its sliding down their slimy fat bodies because the fabric stretched out.
the only other group of people constantly adjusting their pants are fucking wannabe gangstas that don't wear belts cause showing your boxers is considered cool in their culture fsr.

>>8367110
I'm not the person who posted that picture. You seem new in that you don't realize there is a way to check how many people are posting in a thread vs how many replies there are. I didn't post the pictures, I just wanted to comment that I do think she's an ita- no clue who she is like I said before, sure she's a nice person but she needs to learn how to dress better and do the proper thing and learn how to make her clothes stay on. So that you know, she won't look like shit.

>> No.8367557

>>8367553
>classic lolita
kek

>> No.8367577

>>8364833
Did she remove the bow on the jsk or something? Surely this isn't a replica.

>> No.8367620

>>8366929
The account name is killing me.

>> No.8367627
File: 65 KB, 443x490, salty.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367627

>>8367555
damn anon, is your last name Morton because you're like an entire salt factory right now

>> No.8367668

>>8366211
I'm more concerned about what looks to be a SS Goku in the background.

>> No.8367695

>>8367216
Are you kidding me? Even if it was coorded nicely, the dress is a handmade disaster. The fabric loks weird and the skirt is misshapen. That alone is enough to put this into ita territory.

>> No.8367700
File: 134 KB, 720x960, 10930166_770630919677665_9213204235519098353_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367700

>> No.8367711
File: 189 KB, 720x960, 10858642_753729044701186_3182748059704231150_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367711

>> No.8367714

>>8367577
Yes it's real. The bow is detachable.

>> No.8367721
File: 582 KB, 1600x1200, Photo0773.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367721

>> No.8367738

>>8367711
lol anyone else think she kinda looks similar to choke here? just her face I mean

>> No.8367757

>>8367627
I do enjoy me some salt, in all its glorious forms.

>> No.8367770

>>8367738
Yeah! Kinda looks like her from a glance

>> No.8367786

>>8367544
This isn't all that bad. Like it's not 100% Lolita, but it's not painful to look at. Perhaps it'd be a good otome outfit.

>> No.8367798

>>8367721
This is just a bad photo... and i'm sure she's aware that shes not wearing shoes. Idk this isn't really offensive to me.

>> No.8367875

>>8367544
Damn this had potential too. People need to stop with those shitty normalfag belts for lolita.

>> No.8367883

>>8367875
I like them for making an outfit more casual.

>> No.8367935

>>8366016

Agree. Btw I love dress' fabric.

>> No.8367940

>>8364833
Maybe a cute belt, center that bow, maybe a cuter hat and I'm not too feeling those shoes but they're somewhat nice and then it'd be rather cute.

>> No.8367967

>>8367544
Honestly, I kinda like this. It's not proper lolita, no but the outfit looks nice and put-together.

>> No.8367978
File: 142 KB, 960x960, 11377309_10152724175822294_6353012760016387689_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8367978

This wouldn't be ita if it just fit her FFS. As a plus size lolita I get that it sucks when a dress you love doesn't fit but it's truly better to just let go and get a fitting dress than look so bad.

>> No.8367992

>>8367978
I feel bad for this girl, since her outfits aren't that horrible but she's so unfortunate looking and frumpy.

>> No.8367993

>>8367978
is she preggo?

>> No.8367995

>>8367978
Her teeth are fucking terrifying.

>> No.8367997

>>8367978
God, she could eat an apple through a letterbox

>> No.8368007

>>8366997
I think she actually looks cute

>> No.8368010

>>8367555
fat does not equal automatic ita

you are insufferable

>> No.8368013

>>8367544
This is cute for casual. Needs a necklace tho. The top looks so plain compared to the rest of the outfit.

>> No.8368022

>>8367978
What the fuck is going on with her bodice

>> No.8368039

I'd like to see a good coord done with sugary carnival someday

>> No.8368047

>>8367978
This girl has improved so much, though. Does anyone have pictures from her early days?
Based on that, I think one day she might actually be good.

>> No.8368049

>>8368022
her chest is too big/breasts hang too low for the cut of the dress, so the high-waist is cutting her boobs off in an awkward position.

>> No.8368078

>>8368047
I've seen her have good coords, but a horrible fit like that is instant ita.

>> No.8368132

>>8366931
Can't tell if the coord's bad, but the picture's cute.

>> No.8368145

>>8367209
This wouldn't be bad with a different blouse, but I already like the pastel clusterfuck aesthetic.

>> No.8368148

>>8368049
who puts a dress on like that and is like "yes good i am kawaii" christ

>> No.8368317

>>8368148
i'm not sure, i only know what's happening because i remember it's happened to me a few times after getting a dress in the mail. it's not comfortable and feels (and obviously looks) very awkward so i'm quite surprised that she went out like that...her situation looks even worse because her chest looks even larger/dress looks even smaller than the times i did it.
what worked for me was tightening the straps on my bra as much as i could (without the bra going too far up that it didnt wanna stay on my titties). that usually helps me be able to then settle the girls in above the waistline and it's looked pretty fine, but that's only if there's even room for my tits in the first place - by the way the bodice is stretched out the dress looks just plain too small, chest is far too large to fit into the bodice without hurting her chest or ripping the dress.

i know how frustrating it is to get a dress and have it not fit properly, but i am unsure if she just is completely unaware or just really wanted to wear the dress. either way, honestly, the best thing to do is just sell it and find something that fits, get a binder if that will help, or get it professionally altered. i think the only thing that sucks more than trying on a dress and seeing it doesn't fit well, is trying to force yourself into it and pretend it does. i know cgl thinks she looks a little homely but i think she's endearingly cute and has some nice coords but...this isn't one of them and it's all because of how odd the fit of the dress is. she'd like 10x nicer if the bodice didn't fit so bizarrely.

>> No.8368337

>>8367202
what is that diarrhea-vomit-pochette-thing on her left arm?

>> No.8368369

>>8368317
I have this happen myself. Large cup size, shallow bust. I'm also a bit saggy from an 80lb weight loss since my weight is distributed in the top rather on the bottom. I usually adjust bra straps and wear an underbust corset to help get them up in there if it's a high waist. I don't need to tightlace or anything, it just helps to get them in the proper position. Plus it helps with posture. Also, I don't buy JSKs if the straps don't attach with a button, I usually need to adjust them, but sometimes I can get away without it and just using my normal methods if it has buttonholes on the straps. Other times I just move the button on the strap down if it's the type with the loop or the button hole on the back of the dress.

>> No.8368380

>>8367522
giant ass here, can confirm. Short skirts are a struggle.

>> No.8368385

>>8367978
Is this the same girl who wore the Sugar Dream Dome salopette and it was horrifically short/tight on her? Those teeth look so familiar.

>> No.8368448

>>8368385
yes it is

>> No.8368540

mfw i should have taken pictures of itas at momocon this weekend

saw so many- might try to see if i can find any of the really bad ones.

also STOP WEARING ANIMAL EARS WITH LOLITA

>> No.8368556

>>8366341
I saw her at the con and I have to say, I don't understand chubby/fat lolitas jumping on the underskirt thing. It just makes them look even bigger.

>> No.8368565
File: 53 KB, 350x750, 68124fe017c8261053f49e8e5cce206b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8368565

>>8368540
No.

>> No.8368601

>>8368565
Goddamn it Misako.

>> No.8368608

>>8368556
a too short skirt looks worse, but that is for tall/fat lolitas. this girls dress already goes past the knees

>> No.8368660

>>8367978
Does anyone have this girl's blog? I'm curious to see her other coords since apparently some of them are decent.

>> No.8368840

>>8367738
I honestly thought this was just an old picture of choke for a second. At least this girl has potential.

>> No.8368933

>>8366929
That was bad indeed..

>> No.8369042
File: 165 KB, 960x960, FB_IMG_1433130641401.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8369042

>> No.8369057

>>8369042
thank fucking god

>> No.8369070

>>8369042
I feel this is a nitpick. I understand she wants to go sweeter and that's fine. The accessorize is killing it though. Some nicer quality sweeter jewelry would be fine rather than bunnies and big cheap plastic beads. Trim the bangs on the wig. I actually like this color with this print for some reason even though I'd normally prefer a natural color. Not liking the floral headband, florals could be incorporated but it feels off given the colors and choice of accessories.

>> No.8369071
File: 170 KB, 640x997, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8369071

>> No.8369077

>>8369070
>accessories* god damn it.

>> No.8369096

>>8369071
The first coord is actually better...
It's still cruddy, but at least it isn't frumpy and everything matches.

>> No.8369103

>>8369071
I feel sorry for this girl. The first really is better. Even without a blouse, it's not awful. That second one just looks deflated and her blouse is awful.

>> No.8369321

>>8369071
>>8369096
>>8369103
Maybe I'm weird but I really like the second coord more? Like yes the blouse is mad questionable but it's more interesting and shows greater mastery than the first one. The pinks are all complimentary and I think the demure poof works much better with a dress that intense, especially since there's no print to look collapsed and awful.

>> No.8369354

>>8369071
I wouldn't mind it as much if she just said it was cult party.

>> No.8369373

>>8369321

When going low poof lolita, it's not the print being collapsed that we tend to focus on, it's how the second photo has so little poof the whole dress looks like a frumpy sack covered in frills instead of a proper dress. Her body is more or less a rectangle, this isn't exactly a flattering silhoutte.

As for greater mastery, she completely did not bother balancing the mint green with anything and focused only on adding pink to the dress. The cardi doesn't really work with her blouse, and the pinks aren't so much complimentary as all different shades of pink. The darker shades of pink is contaminating the cream yellow, making the white cardi look grey and dirty, same effect as if she's wearing ivory and white together. This isn't even including why she's carrying 3 differently themed plushies (alpaca, bag and usakumya friend charm) and wearing a floral crown. Sorry, but this is a mess. Girl needs to learn to simplify and go back to basics instead of throwing every single thing she likes into one outfit.

>> No.8369433

>>8366392
omg you're right
Haha maybe the underskirt is like compensation or something, since everything is big...

>> No.8369440

>>8366801
This looks handmade though but for someone making their own garments she should actually be making things that fit her figure better..that's a shame. (and then I'm not even saying stuff about the coord or fabric of the dress itself).

>> No.8369672
File: 92 KB, 600x600, image_0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8369672

>>8366933

>> No.8369698

>>8367010
It's like an ita family, oh god.

>> No.8369703

>>8369354
you clearly don't know what cult party is

>> No.8369765

>>8368337
rillakuma you pleb

>> No.8369826

>>8368556
i'm not sure why i'm responding to this, but i'm the girl in the photo. i wore an underskirt even though the dress is the long version because of a previous photo getting ripped apart here that was too short and showed my knees. so now i'm paranoid about my knees showing. the underskirt is too big on me due to weight loss, but it slips down more in the front than in the back because my butt is larger than my stomach. i didn't realize it had fallen down or i would have fixed it before the photos were taken. it's not my best outfit (and it's just a special set so i didn't put much work into the coordinate) but i didn't think it was worth all this discussion.

>> No.8369834

>>8369826
You claim you've lost weigh but you're still much too fat for this fashion, get a clue or a gym membership.

>> No.8369842

>>8369826
>i had a knee-jerk reaction to /cgl/ and now i'm back to backpedal about my own insecure blunder and act like 3 responses is a huge discussion

kek

>> No.8369844

>>8369834
Wow fuck off honestly. I'm neither the girl in the photo nor anyone previously in this thread, but you're a seriously vile person. I even agree that the coord looks like trash ok, but what's even trashier is your attitude about her weight. You take it to an obsessive degree and I'm beginning to think the whiteknights calling out one specific vendetta-chan every time this girl gets posted are right. Take the tampon out of your ass girl.

>> No.8369852

>>8369844
not that anon and not agreeing with her but calm down this isn't serious and anon is most likely being a bitch to bait people like you into reacting, even if she's serious.

>> No.8369853

>>8369842
Not her but it's well more than 3. Something like 12 at least

>>8366214
>>8366221
>>8366223
>>8366224
>>8366230
>>8366234
>>8366243
>>8366245
>>8366276
>>8366341
>>8366369
>>8366375
>>8366396
>>8366412
>>8366434
>>8366443
>>8366947
>>8366974
>>8367002
>>8367094
>>8367095
>>8367097
>>8367107
>>8367109
Before I got bored and stopped.

>> No.8369858

>>8369853
right, most of these are people arguing with eachother not discussing anything. if anything i didn't realize this girl needed so many white knights.

>> No.8369865

>>8369826
Here's a tip, never respond to massive amounts of hate on this website. Nothing good will come of it.

>> No.8369868

>>8369765
That someone ran over with their car?

>> No.8369880

>>8369858
All I can think is that she's a super nice irl and a bit insecure and people feel like they need to defend her as she might not be able to herself.

>> No.8369911

>>8369826
Don't take what these people are saying to heart. your coord is actually pretty good. Congrats on the weight loss!

>> No.8369917
File: 503 KB, 664x958, Screen Shot 2015-06-01 at 11.53.29 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8369917

>> No.8369968

>>8369917
>everything is off brand
we can tell
honestly i don't know why people think it's ok to wear an offbrand main piece
normie clothes don't work for lolita 99.999% of the time
handmade is one thing, but grabbing something from target and proclaiming it's lolita is another

>> No.8369976

>>8369911
is CoF made by a gull just to post them here and make fun of ppl?
~coNSpiraCY

im a conspiracy dork, sorry

>> No.8369987

>>8368540
NO IT'S DAMN CUTE really f off with your no-animal-ears

>> No.8369993

>>8369968
As long as its made for lolita it's fine, right?

>> No.8369995

>>8369976
Underskirt girl didn't even post to CoF. Someone took that picture from Tumblr (not her own, she doesn't post her coords there much anymore either). Another reason to suspect vendetta.

>> No.8370088

wow. ita for the win. this is trying to hard and failing

>> No.8370105

>>8369987
when done tastefully, it can look cute, but it's tacky 98% of the time

>> No.8370107

>>8367978
the jsk has reach maximum capacity

>> No.8370117

>>8369993
but target doesn't sell things made for lolita

>> No.8370132
File: 47 KB, 723x748, 11351126_964259343605726_5707975939638159274_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8370132

How do you regress this hard?

>> No.8370138

>>8370132
I cannot even believe this is the same girl. What happened?

>> No.8370147
File: 66 KB, 744x744, 11012764_1007981615892188_502635900626647028_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8370147

>>8370138
I don't think I want to know.

Another regression from the "progress thread". Order is bottom left, top left, then right.

>> No.8370150
File: 98 KB, 842x960, 11136166_10205537520511885_8291862812649062105_o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8370150

>Can't believe how far this coord came :3 I'm quite proud of myself

>> No.8370167

>>8370150
Looks like an aubergine on the left.

>> No.8370176

>>8370150
is one of them supposed to be better?

>> No.8370186

>>8370150
Is that Angel Buckley? Ugh.

>> No.8370206

>>8370150
Fucking hell. I must have spent 20 minutes trying to talk her out of the damn forever 21 shirts, but that chick never listens.

>> No.8370365
File: 104 KB, 960x720, 551500_10207008433434877_1160408807853098728_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8370365

>> No.8370377
File: 486 KB, 319x170, ytnre.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8370377

>>8370365
>hey this doesn't look so --
>WHAT THE FUCK IS ON HER FACE

>> No.8370383

>>8370365
That's a cute costume.

>> No.8370500

>>8370150
She looks fine aside the weird skirt shape.

>> No.8370519
File: 645 KB, 500x580, 1410139073091.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8370519

>>8370500

>> No.8370525

>>8370150
I mean, she does look better. Not good, per se, but better.

>> No.8370526

>>8370500
>>8370525
Agreed. This is somewhat better than her other coords.

>> No.8370536

>>8370500
I don't understand why she refuses to buy blouses. It's like this weird stubbornness.

>> No.8370623
File: 44 KB, 402x500, 1311948270220.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8370623

>>8369672

>> No.8370631

>>8369917
She is cute but needs a wig or something because I am not feeling that color. Her lip color is also???
Overall, I dont think her outfit is bad, not what she was aiming for but with different shoes it could have gone a more classic route imo

>> No.8370638

>>8370365
wtf her face.
Needs more eye make up too, those lenses make her look like a bug

>> No.8370644

>>8370147
it got worse if anything what the fuck

>> No.8370646

>>8367978
Where are her breasts in this situation? And jesus she looks so happy so I understand the grin, but would the photographer not suggest a closed-mouth smile?

>> No.8370654

>>8370646
Boobs are under the waist of the dress popping out making her look pregnant

>> No.8370658

>>8367978
>that sad lonely usakumya at the other end of the bench

>> No.8371219
File: 14 KB, 293x74, Screen Shot 2014-09-14 at 7.56.46 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8371219

>>8370638
nah i think the last thing she needs is
>more eye makeup

>> No.8371438
File: 13 KB, 303x166, 1432670599824.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8371438

>>8365610

>> No.8371444

People keep screaming nitpick so why don't we just make a thread for that?

>> No.8371468
File: 670 KB, 1298x1732, cd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8371468

>>8367978
Reminds me of what happened to pic related girl.

when will busty girls learn to dress themselves in a way that flatters them??

>> No.8371479

>>8364833
Nitpick.
Not great but can easily be worked on to be a good coord. Definitely no where near Ita.

>> No.8371500

>>8371468
the blues doesn't match and this is so fucking unflattering. lose some weight or something, jfc

>> No.8371502

>>8371468
Busty girls can. You just don't notice how busty they are when its done right.

>> No.8371512

>>8370631
Do you even lolita bro?

>> No.8371543

>>8371502
I suppose so. Would binders help at all? The girl in the pic had a much better coord that suited her well, but the SSD high waist JSK doesn't look very forgiving for well-endowed girls.

>> No.8371546

>>8371543
>SDD, not SSD lmao

>> No.8371560

>>8371543
As a busty girl, hell no binders won't really help. It'll take the measurements down but it's still going to look awkward as fuck. I don't know why people keep recommending them. Good for ouji, not good for lolita.

I know, cause I bought one - for ouji. It took my bust down 10 cm, which would be fantastic for lolita, but it flattens your chest, so then if you have the room, you also have this weird ass gape where breasts should be. Even wearing a bra underneath does nothing for breast shape. I mean, I guess theoretically if it were really important to you you could wear an A/B cup bra over the binder, but that's just getting way too complicated. And then that extra breast tissue is pushed down towards your waist, so if the dress is really fitted, it's gonna look weird as fuck. Ouji it's not so bad, because the clothing should be looser fitted, and the clothing tends to mask the problem.

People should just buy stuff that fucking fits or lose weight. There is a shit ton of lolita clothing that can fit larger girls if they stop getting hung up on certain prints. Even at 5'2", 150 pounds, and 32G breasts, I managed.

>> No.8371561
File: 240 KB, 424x630, Screen Shot 2015-06-01 at 10.42.31 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8371561

>> No.8371566

>>8370365
This is cute in an experimental j-fash kinda way. I have seen a lot of harajuku outfit snaps that look way wackier than this.

>> No.8371575

>>8370365
Even more than the eyes on her face what irks me is the combo of navy, black, and brown
NOOOOOOOO

>> No.8371581

>>8371561
her new video is great! what is she parodying though?

>> No.8371673

>>8367004
>crazy pilgrim hooker
If that's what she was goin for, she hit the mark.

>> No.8371732

>>8365037
Ain't nothing wrong with this, you salty bitch.

>>8365053
If you have to explain why it's ita? It's not ita.

>>8365075
Sauce on those shoes? For research...

>>8365169
Why the glasses hate? Not everyone can do contacts you know.

>>8365243
I hope you mean back then, like victorian era...and not back when the woman in the picture was born. Because anon...

>>8365937
>>8366016
Still looks like shit. She should at least start with a dress that fits.

>> No.8371743

>>8367204
Rule of three is bullshit that cgl made up, anon.

>> No.8371748

>>8370132
Hardest regression I have ever seen.
I hope she made a horrible mistake with the years.

>> No.8371751

>>8371743
The "rule of three" is a good guide for newbies to understand color balance and even distribution of motifs/textures/large items. The name makes it sound more rigid than it really is, but it's just a guideline.

>> No.8371756

>>8367555
>fat =/= slimy.

What the fuck are you smoking, anon?

>>8368565
Her pinks don't match. What an ita.

>>8369826
Ignore the anon with the obvious vendetta. 8369865 This anon has it right.

>> No.8372624

>>8371581
I think it's just a general parody of lolita tutorials

>> No.8372893

>>8371673
I kek'd

>> No.8372898

>>8370631
What the fuck are you smoking?
Or are you just a non lolita who thinks they understand the fashion?

>> No.8372925

>>8369042
nitpick

>> No.8373059

>>8370525
exactly

>> No.8373342
File: 83 KB, 720x960, FB_IMG_1433287863501.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
8373342

Oh dear. No. Just no. Why.

>> No.8374326

>>8373342
mormon-chan

>> No.8374938

>>8373342
The fuck is that.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action