Online Comm Thread

[Anonymous No.9014341]

Old thread >>8998532

Lovelor claimed to not have an opinion about this.

[Anonymous No.9014345]

>>9014341
Her argument doesn't make any fucking sense. Brands are well aware there are oversea customers, else they won't open official shops there.

[Anonymous No.9014349]

>>9014341
lol i don't know why people were freaking out about this, it wasn't exactly a groundbreaking video.

[Anonymous No.9014363]

Can we talk about how bad Lolita Humor is? Wtf finally they got moderation

[Anonymous No.9014366]

>>9014349
Yeah. It was interesting, but by no means something to get excited about.

[Anonymous No.9014384]

I can't post caps right now, but the petticoat discussion in Lolita Updates.. Lilianne is a fucking tool. Petticoat anon, I'm sorry you have to deal with those people.. someone always have to be Ms pissy pants..

[Anonymous No.9014392]

>>9014384
I love when cgl people post on fb because you can see how ita the people here are.

[Anonymous No.9014396]

>>9014392
Did the thread get deleted?
I don't think she looks THAT bad, but there is definitely room for improvement.

[Anonymous No.9014406]

>>9014384
Christ, she won't stop.

[Anonymous No.9014411]

>>9014384
*rufflechat

[Anonymous No.9014413]

>>9014384
She moved it to rc:u because she got banned from posting in that thread.

[Anonymous No.9014414]

this whole petticoat thing started out well-intentioned but, as expected, devolved pretty quickly.
kim, do you always mean to make an ass of yourself, or is it just a reflex? if you're so dead set on making this happen, pony up the cash/goods yourself instead of expecting someone to do it for you. and for god's sake, try to be professional for once.

[Anonymous No.9014418]

>>9014414
Remember to block out names so the thread doesn't get deleted

[Anonymous No.9014428]

>>9014414
Oh well, she got a deflated petticoat donated. This project just got doomed. Why would she send a ruined product for a company to work with? They will assume that's the amount of poof we're interested in..

[Anonymous No.9014430]

And she has flounced!

[Anonymous No.9014431]

>>9014430
Petticoats are serious business.

[Anonymous No.9014432]

>>9014428
isnt this easily explained to them? like why would you be like "yes we want it to look sad and deflated exactly like this", you could just explain what the deal is and show how they are supposed to look

[Anonymous No.9014433]

>>9014431
more caps pls

[Anonymous No.9014442]

>>9014433
This is gonna take a while.
OP (the one who got blocked from the original rufflechat thread) will always be black. The girl with the furry icon also got blocked at the same time she did for being an idiot as well.

[Anonymous No.9014445]

>>9014442
Nothing more of value in this comment tree.

[Anonymous No.9014449]

>>9014442

[Anonymous No.9014457]

>>9014449
I think she's going on a deleting spree, so I capped everything I could.

[Anonymous No.9014461]

>>9014457

[Anonymous No.9014465]

>>9014461

[Anonymous No.9014466]

>>9014465

[Anonymous No.9014507]

>>9014466
Should I continue? It's a lot of capping.

[Anonymous No.9014511]

>>9014507
Please continue if you don't mind. I'm not a member of the group and this is entertaining.

>>9014432
>show how they are supposed to look
you just said it yourself.. this is why they should send a non deflated one instead of the "I want this but not like this"-crap

[Anonymous No.9014518]

>>9014511
Will do!

[Anonymous No.9014519]

>>9014518

[Anonymous No.9014521]

>>9014519
Somewhere in there is some comments from Ina, but she blocked me for calling her an edgy tryhard last year. If another anon could get those it would be awesome

[Anonymous No.9014524]

>>9014521

[Anonymous No.9014526]

>>9014524

[Anonymous No.9014528]

>>9014526

[Anonymous No.9014533]

>>9014528
I might have mixed up the order or this comment tree, sorry.

[Anonymous No.9014536]

>>9014533

[Anonymous No.9014539]

I see that not one of these gals have worked in the garment industry. It's pretty standard to get a sample to knock off.

[Anonymous No.9014540]

>>9014536
>not knowing malco modes at all

[Anonymous No.9014541]

>>9014539
Oh it gets better, OP claims to have a fashion degree.

[Anonymous No.9014542]

>>9014540

[Anonymous No.9014544]

>>9014542

[Anonymous No.9014546]

>>9014544

[Anonymous No.9014547]

I'd think that MM, being the petticoat fountainhead for years would somehow have a better grasp of petticoat technology and structure. Maybe it will take them YEARS AND YEARS to crack this one.

[Anonymous No.9014549]

>>9014546

[Anonymous No.9014553]

>>9014549

[Anonymous No.9014557]

>>9014553

[Anonymous No.9014558]

>>9014557

[Anonymous No.9014559]

>>9014558

[Anonymous No.9014560]

>>9014559

[Anonymous No.9014561]

>>9014560

[Anonymous No.9014563]

>>9014561

[Anonymous No.9014565]

>>9014563
And that's it for what I got. There are loose ends and new posts I'll try to add on if they're worth getting

[Anonymous No.9014572]

>reading that entire thread

[Anonymous No.9014574]

>>9014565
Thanks anon, you're a peach!

[Anonymous No.9014586]

>>9014565
But wait! There's more. Gotta plug that useless fashion "degree"

[Anonymous No.9014587]

>>9014586

[Anonymous No.9014588]

>>9014587

[Anonymous No.9014590]

>>9014588

[Anonymous No.9014593]

>>9014590
This is where the new shit goes full retard.

[Anonymous No.9014594]

>>9014593
Are they both twelve or just emotionally stunted?

[Anonymous No.9014597]

>>9014594

[Anonymous No.9014598]

>>9014597

[Anonymous No.9014600]

>>9014597
Holy shit

[Anonymous No.9014601]

>>9014598
I'll post anything else that comes up if it's worth it.

[Anonymous No.9014605]

Just for shits and giggles, I tried to find something that fashiondegree-chan designed and made. This is all I could find and it looks like something an eight year old girl would scribble in her maths binder. The construction is decent-ish though, so I will give her that.

There is nothing original about it.

[Anonymous No.9014653]

>>9014605
thank you for this anon

[Anonymous No.9014656]

God bless, caps anon.

[Anonymous No.9014658]

>>9014605
Tbqh 8 year olds come up with some pretty darn good ideas.
Even if this isn't a groundbreaking idea, it's still original unless she directly copied it from one source (which is her issue with the petticoats).
It's a goddamn petticoat though, I wish people would get as worked up about replicas as they did about this.

[Anonymous No.9014664]

>>9014658
well..

[Anonymous No.9014673]

>>9014664
This is not the same design, anon.
I'm not trying to defend her, but copying a pattern from an existing piece is different from making something similar to an idea that's already out there.

[Anonymous No.9014696]

>>9014363
Please, these girls need Jesus.

[Anonymous No.9014699]

>>9014696
>Please, these girls need Jesus.

They need Mana. FTFY.

[Anonymous No.9014800]

>>9014560
>nearly nobody is agreeing with me, shit what to do
>oh right, post memes about how #notbothered I am!!

[Anonymous No.9014834]

>>9014605
>>9014664
how embarrassing

[Anonymous No.9014914]

Sorry you guys. I didn't know this was gonna happen.

To clarify about the deflated petti thing, I explained that a spare would mostly like be deflated but that isn't how we like to wear them, and they said they understood and they just wanted to see like the basics of how it's made. They are also down for buying a new petticoat from BH. The only reason I went with sending them a donation first was so they don't have to wait for a commission to be finished and international shipping and whatnot. Also after considering it I told them I would be willing to give up my not deflated MLT petticoat. If it comes to that I'll figure something out until I can get a replacement!

I just kept seeing people talk about long petticoat waiting times and needing stuff in time for events and I thought this could help since MM pettis are so great, and I guess I got a little too excited when MM was responding so positively to the idea, judging by how unhappy people are with me.

I'm gonna keep in contact with MM and hopefully you will start seeing some bell pettis from them at some point... I'll not post about it anymore if people are annoyed by me/all this

Also sorry for deleting the thread, but I already got a donation and the thread was devolving real quick and I didn't think there was a point in having it up anymore, and I kept having to make the same comment over and over and over

[Anonymous No.9015063]

>>9014914
Hey dont be sorry! You are doing a great thing and the people complain know so little about fashion and industries its almost insulting!

Im sure MM will send your petti back to you even, unless they are buying it from you.

Itll be great if they start this and all those pissy lolitas will end up buying from MM anyway

[Anonymous No.9015065]

>>9014914
I was wanting to apologise to you anon, who knew that posting in RC would be such a shit storm!

[Anonymous No.9015068]

>>9014914
You are not the one to be ashamed. L is an idiot who needs to know when to stop.

[Anonymous No.9015077]

>>9014914
People should be fucking stoked that MM is interested in making an actual lolita petti.. sorry you had to deal with that. Please still keep us updated on /cgl/

[Anonymous No.9015080]

>>9014914
Ask them to buy an organdie pannier from Meta or AP, those are best-tier for cupcake. And the material holds shape very well.

[Anonymous No.9015100]

>>9014914
Fuck the haters. I have a Malco modes a line, id love to have a bell shaped lolita petti made by them.

[Anonymous No.9015180]

>>9015063
>>9015065
>>9015068
>>9015100
Aw thanks guys. That was a pretty crazy couple of hours that I was not expecting at all. Even wonderfinch made an appearance to talk about how distasteful my idea was lol.

I'll just post updates here every now and then! Fingers crossed that everything works out

>>9015080
I did link them to meta and AP's pettis as well!

[Anonymous No.9015187]

>>9015100
I would love an official MM petti for lolita fashion, especially if they give the right length. I fudged a bell-shaped one with the 580 by pinning up and stitching (8 spots around in one layer, another 8 spots in the second layer), but it's still so long that it only works with Meta's "medium" skirts and some IW pieces. The fluff's staying power is amazing, but it's still too long for a lot of items I own.

[Anonymous No.9015513]

Anybody have any issues with guys messaging you after posting to groups like Rufflechat and Closet of Frills?

[Anonymous No.9015548]

>>9015513
Ugh. Yes. I used to get random dudes from Qatar and Dubai messaging me after posting to certain comms. I changed my privacy settings and it's tapered off, though.

[Anonymous No.9015549]

>>9014914
I'd rather you send the deflated. I'm no longer happy with my mlt and I've only had it since January. Most of my dresses are too heavy and deflate it disappointingly as soon as I walk outside. I wonder if there's a problem with her construction

[Anonymous No.9015582]

>>9014559
'Ethic of work'. Holy shit. This girl. I'd be more happy if something I made was withstanding time because of proper design. That's good work.

[Anonymous No.9015595]

>>9014673
>>9014658
Stop white knighting a bitch who is throwing a fit over pettis. Its a scalloped skirt. Absolutely nothing new or inventive about it.

[Anonymous No.9015678]

>>9015595
I didn't say it was some groundbreaking design. She is complaining about directly copying another persons design by taking it apart and replicating it. This is different, it's a skirt she self drafted. I'm not whiteknighting, y'all are just looking to bitch about her.

[Anonymous No.9015685]

>>9014914
I recommend one day in paradise's petticoat from Lolita Collective. It's like $40, but really comfy and from organza material. I live in the Northwest and it arrived 4 days after I ordered.

[Anonymous No.9015715]

>>9015513
>>9015548
please report this to the mods with screencaps? these are closed groups, please get the creeps kicked out

>>9015678
>it's a skirt she self drafted
ok anon, and how do you claim to know this

[Anonymous No.9015794]

>>9015513
Please, please report it if this happens. A lot of these groups are set up so that people can approve/add their friends, so if one spambot or creep sneaks in, they can add others, but if it's reported, a moderator can track back to who added the creeps and wipe out the whole chain.

[Anonymous No.9015814]

>>9015685
>ODiP
Are they still around, or is this leftover stock? I'm all for good pettis but feel uncomfortable buying these if the money goes to a known scammer and dramacow.

[Anonymous No.9015823]

>>9015814
Its left over stock, and really they never made anything themselves. Its likely a CP petti.

[Anonymous No.9015938]

>>9014384
Does the whole thing scream scam to anyone else?

[Anonymous No.9015944]

>>9015938
no, because malco modes is a reputable company and will probably either cover the cost of the petti or send the girl a free one in return
calm the fuck down, what evil masterplan do you think this to be
'oh, I know, lets steal all the pettis of all the lolitas so they can never look cute again!!'

[Anonymous No.9015947]

>>9015944
I was thinking like she wasn't actually taking to a mm rep but I like the evil mastermind thing better. But tell me again, who needs to calm down?

[Anonymous No.9015949]

>>9015947
I'm calm, I just like to swear
so many people seem to be convinced that this is some sort of fraud or scam
why would it be a scam? someone got tired of waiting on MLT's waitlist? from what I've understood they contacted MM, not the other way around, so how could it be someone else?

[Anonymous No.9015959]

>>9014914
So do you still need donations? I'll throw you a little bit if you're buying a new one for them to look at.

[Anonymous No.9015960]

>>9015715
Not that anon, but regardless of how salty we are at her, she's still innocent until proven guilty.

It's just a scalloped design, it's not patented. Unless she's claiming she came up with that idea, or something?

[Anonymous No.9015962]

I'm convinced the MM drama is only exploding like it is because there simply isn't anything else going on in the online comm atm. It's absolutely a non-issue.

If the worry is that MM won't properly reimburse the person who sends a petticoat then...why not simply...ask? "Okay MM, I'll agree to send the petticoat if I am guaranteed reimbursement or receive another free petti of my choice."

[Anonymous No.9015968]

>>9015938
Not necessarily a scam, just ill-advised. From what she's been saying about her conversation with MM, I wouldn't be surprised if they're expecting her to make a wholesale petticoat order from them once they hash out all the production details.
If that's the case we'll probably get to see a whole song and dance about preorders or Kickstarter or whatever in a couple months, and you know how well those tend to go.

[Anonymous No.9015971]

>>9015968
considering several people emailed them, not just her, and they asked about how much interest she thinks there would be, it's highly unlikely

[Anonymous No.9015992]

>>9015971
>several people
>how much interest kim thinks there is
Right, several people and an amateur guess totally means they'll have a sustainable customer base. Why would MM do a relatively small production run on their own dime for a niche clientele that they don't have any real numbers on? Nobody's surveyed the comm at large for what they want in a petti, the price point they'd pay, etc. That's not even bringing into account the number of people who talk about how much they want one but won't shell out the money when the time comes.
Sam's (the manufacturing side of MM) does do customized versions of their base pettis for a higher price, and wholesale orders of petticoats made to spec (which is what this would most likely be), but from the business side of things it would be a risk for them to do this themselves without any real information.

[Anonymous No.9016110]

>>9015715
If she is in fashion and used it for school, there is a 99% likelihood that it is self drafted. Or even if she didn't, if it's something she is proud enough to present like that, it wouldn't be copied or from a commercial pattern.

[Anonymous No.9016114]

>>9015823
It is not a classical puppets petticoat. It has a custom printed label and is a different design to the CP ones. I've had mine for a while and it doesn't deflate. It's very fluffy. The only fault I can see with it is that the lining is slightly shorter than the petticoat material so it can be a bit itchy, but I generally wear another deflated petticoat under it anyway for extra oomph

[Anonymous No.9016158]

>>9015947
Don't worry, no scam here. I'm not sure which side you're saying would be scamming, me or them, but I can say no to both.

>>9015959
No no, no cash! I wasn't looking for cash donations, please keep your money. I was looking for spare pettis that people didn't need anymore for whatever reason. Someone did contact me about donating one. Sorry for being unclear!

>>9015992
Skepticism is good, I'm glad there are comments like this! I'll send them a clarification email to make sure that they're not planning on making this a wholesale scenario. I am 100% not interested in pooling money via KS or any other method and will never do that.

[Anonymous No.9017805]

So many good threads on fb for popcorn eating lately.

[Anonymous No.9017850]

>>9017805
I had to go check out what you were talking about. Here are caps for everyone's entertainment.

It sucks that this is how she had to learn (everyone telling her that the dress she spent money on is awful), because I think it's one thing if someone is reading a blog and they find out that lace monsters are bad on their own/by themselves, but everyone commenting was still pretty cordial. She just took it so personally...no one was even saying anything about *her* specifically. It sucks to be told that your dress is ugly but, what are you gonna do.

[Anonymous No.9017873]

>>9017850
When did thoughtful concrit become bullying and meanness? People need to stop asking for opinions if that's not what they actually want. Or were they looking for proof that the lolita community is full of meanies?
And then the person near the bottom talking about being a lolita in your heart? Ugggghhhh.

[Anonymous No.9017888]

>>9017873
Didn't you get the memo? If you're not complimenting someone, you're insulting them.
Talk about 2016 in a nutshell.

[Anonymous No.9018736]

>>9017850
What was with her pulling the "I have mommy issues" card? Like, no one asked for your life story, we're just saying your dress is shit.

[Anonymous No.9018778]

>>9017873
>being a lolita in your heart
biggest lolita pet peeve ever

[Anonymous No.9018835]

>>9014341
Eh, I think it is kida shady of her to present it that way. "John Leigh is bad, buuuut who will represent the brands???" I don't think she should be neutral about something like this desu.

[Anonymous No.9018863]

>>9017850
Both her and lolita-at-heart-girl left the group by now.

[Anonymous No.9018949]

>>9014914

I'm very excited about MM making a possible cupcake line. It would mean good sizing options, shipping from USA, and a good quality petti ! I'm sorry this caused such a shit storm on RC. Bitches be crazy

[Anonymous No.9018976]

>>9017850
>Have you heard of my lolita dress?

[Anonymous No.9018983]

>>9017850
>my Lolita dress
>Lolita in your heart
>baww abusive ex!
>b-bullies!

[Anonymous No.9018998]

>>9018983
Just when you thought you had seen it all, someone even more pathetic shows up.

[Anonymous No.9019020]

>>9015180
>wonderfinch
>talking about distasteful

[Anonymous No.9019101]

[Anonymous No.9019107]

>>9019101

[Anonymous No.9019120]

>>9019101
"I was wrong, but" shut the fuck up Jillian holy shit just take responsibility for your sperg out. There's a mature way to handle drama and a totally immature way - guess what, you took the latter.

I shouldn't have expected anything less from a hugbox group born because the main admin couldn't handle it when people in other groups didn't kiss her ass.

[Anonymous No.9019158]

>>9016158
Why not just show them a Lolita dress with one of their regular, non-altered pettis under it, then the same dres with the petti trick so many of us have used to make theirs work and close up photos (or a handy diagram) of how we do the tacked tucks in the first 2 layers? Between the technique and the shape difference under a dress, they will 'get it' right away and see what shape we want. Using one of their models they are familiar with, 582.

[Anonymous No.9019182]

>>9018863
Good. People who pull the 'lolita at heart' bs and the ones who ASK for but then argue with concrit are my 2 biggest peeves. If I ask for concrit and get something vague, I might ask for clarification or how I can make it better but I thank the people who post for taking the time to reply, blunt or not. Concrit is (ideally) a favor you are doing for someone to help them improve.

[Anonymous No.9019219]

[Anonymous No.9019236]

>>9019219
Is she sure she was actually looking at posts from this group or looking at things on her newsfeed and seeing posts from other sales groups? I'm in that group and I've seen nothing that didn't fit the measurement minimums the mods put up in order to have proper plus size items in the group...sorry that you can't find anything in your size in this group but nowhere does it say "your size will absolutely be found here"...it's a personal sales group, not a shop, whatever is up there just depends on who's selling what. she sounds legitimately mentally ill.

[Anonymous No.9019249]

>>9019219
>size 22
jesus

[Anonymous No.9019255]

>>9014341
I think she just made the video from a neutral 'reporting' standpoint because it IS a current topic. Youtubers make videos on current topics in their channels but don't always voice an opinion either way. It gets views and it's very promotable in search because it's a popular topic in the online community. Her channel is monetized, right so it's not rocket science why she made it but avoided being opinionated one way or the other.

[Anonymous No.9019470]

>>9018835
People who buy from body,one and generic fast fashion stores don't seem to give a shit about how the owners behave. This should be no different. I'd shop there if I lived in the US.

[Anonymous No.9019556]

>>9017850
>As somebody who makes their own dresses, quality isn't the most important thing to me!

???????????

[Anonymous No.9019558]

>>9019219
>FACEBOOK EXPERIMENTS ON THE DEPRESSED AND ONLY SHOWS THEM DEPRESSING POSTS, THEY'RE BEING SUED FOR IT

ok just because some Clem Cadiddlehopper got a shady budget lawyer to file a suit doesn't mean it has any ground to stand on also enjoy that tinfoil hat

[Anonymous No.9019561]

>>9019236
>Facebook experiments on the depressed and shows them only depressing posts

... uh, yeah. I'd say so.

[Anonymous No.9019582]

The FB thing is true but happened back in 2012, they aren't doing it anymore...

But yes, 4 years back if you noticed your feed had nothing but depressing posts one day, and happy another... there was a reason for that. It was a thought experiment.

However they aren't doing that anymore... They stopped a couple years back. Any claim of that nonsense in present time is BS.

[Anonymous No.9019610]

>>9019219
She crazy like that that. Also supports Donald Trump not to mention bashes on anyone under her size. She's like a rasicist grandpa you kinda just let ramble.

[Anonymous No.9019616]

>>9019219
I'm OP, sorry that I anoned all but two from the same person I completely forgot about those.

Revising it wouldn't work only because everyone saw it now.

Forgive me on that

[Anonymous No.9019700]

what's up with all the ageplayers in lolita humor? Someone just shared something from an ageplay fetish page and I'm pretty sure this isn't the first time

[Anonymous No.9019704]

>>9019700
I saw that just a second ago and can not for the life of me u nderstand why they thought they should do that. Why broadcast your fetish (which makes lolitas unhappy) to a lolita group? She couldve just saved the picture and uploaded it herself and no one wouldve been the wiser.

[Anonymous No.9019808]

>>9019470
>People who buy from body,one and generic fast fashion stores don't seem to give a shit about how the owners behave. This should be no different.
except they model the pieces for fashion shows and adverts and then put them back on the rack

shit like that

it's not worth it

[Anonymous No.9020030]

>>9019470
Again with the bodyline crap...you asume that people that criticize the leighs buy from BL. We don't. in fact people online have been advising against BL and offering alternatives so much, that BL is not as popular as it once was.

[Anonymous No.9020064]

>>9020030
The only reason people don't recommend Bodyline anymore is their jacked up prices. You can't fool anyone, lolitas are ruthless.

[Anonymous No.9020072]

My salt got out of hand recently.
I'm sorry.

[Anonymous No.9020258]

>These girls in Rufflechat talking about having a "lolita persona"
>Some girls seriously talking about their lolita persona as someone separate from their "normal" self
I'm concerned

[Anonymous No.9020268]

From RC: Uncensored.

Quite honestly, I don't see why people are getting this upset over this? Yes, it's gross misrepresentation of J-fashion, but it's coming from Chelsea Handler, a comedian who's known for offensive "humor". I thought lolitas already knew to expect that not every outsider is "lovely and understanding~~~ uwu" about the fashion.

[Anonymous No.9020314]

>>9019219
>"large AP"
>"BtSSB size xs"
>implying these brands' dresses come in different sizes in the first place
Bitch has no idea what she's even complaining about.

>>9019700
>>9019704
I've noticed a lot more kinksters coming out of the woodwork lately, even here on /cgl/. A while back someone made a snarky remark about some whiny brat on one of the FB groups and got attacked for muh kinkshaming by multiple anons. It was pretty bizarre and I don't like it.jpg

[Anonymous No.9020337]

>>9020258
>nobody realizing that was a troll thread
ok

[Anonymous No.9020552]

>>9020337
I can't believe some of these answers.

[Anonymous No.9020574]

>>9020337
I know but some answers were actually legit. Or at least legit looking.

[Anonymous No.9020670]

>>9020574
Some are answering seriously. Wtf

[Anonymous No.9020678]

>>9020574
>>9020670
This shit always makes me want to reply with bullshit copypasta style answers.

[Anonymous No.9020695]

>>9019808
So long as it is known that they do this.
I've been a dresser at fashion shows before and the models (mainly the males though) sweat to disgusting amounts, we had two people mopping this guy and he was still dripping sweat (granted this was a winter show in the middle of summer). But people try on garments in stores, there isn't much difference. And if it is true that buying here is cheaper than buying from brand, it's worth the potential of someone having worn a dress for an hour or so beforehand.

[Anonymous No.9020737]

>>9018736
It is a tumblr method of backpedaling. "I fucked up and made an ass of myself, so now I'm going to blame it on my tragic life story."

[Spoiler !G06lKU6JL. No.9020738]

>>9020268
But the "Japan is so weird" card isn't funny and neither is Handler

[Anonymous No.9020868]

>>9020268
Minori looks so done

[Anonymous No.9020960]

>>9020868
I've never seen Minori look angry or upset until now

[Anonymous No.9021036]

>>9020960
I'd be pretty upset if I was forced to hang out with some old and unfunny shitlord too.

[Anonymous No.9021332]

>>9020268
I wonder if she's dressed so poorly because she picked it out or if it was their mini revenge for her being an ass.

[Anonymous No.9021344]

>>9020574
>>9020670
caps pls

[Anonymous No.9021357]

>>9020268
Handler looks just as nuts as Margo here.

[Anonymous No.9021472]

>>9020268
hory lantern ! i watched this just to see what is the fuss..
>14 min of the 30 min episode was about how gross babies are and mothers are weird for having them
>she did the obvious mom pandering normies do like "do you know alice in wonderland" and "is it cosplay" ?
that woman was unbearable.. why is she even on tv ? the laughtrack made it worse
considering for the studio part she wore a ill fitting van halen shirt that she probably has had since she was 15 , a sequined evening skirt and bright purple shoes, She needs to really learn how to dress before critiquing others

[Anonymous No.9021475]

>>9020695
You're actually not allowed to try on anything other than shoes in the BL shops. And in the brand shops it's only possible if it won't get in direct touch with your skin.

[Anonymous No.9021496]

>>9021475
That is in Japan though, in the US it is common to just try on clothing in stores, they don't even give you the thing to stick over your face to stop makeup getting on clothes.

[Anonymous No.9021501]

>>9014605
cute fairy outfit, would sit in forest with friends in

[Anonymous No.9022019]

Beating a dead horse in frilly free for all. Why does the replica debate still come up so often?

[Anonymous No.9022246]

Wow I can't believe this girl's real name is EGLolita Sflorida.

[Anonymous No.9022426]

What in the ever frilly AP is THAT

[Anonymous No.9022434]

>>9022426
>>9022426
It's adorable is what it is. A bjd with eyebags? my life is complete.

[Anonymous No.9022438]

>>9022426
Is this the same person that was trying to promote their shitty art a while back?

[Anonymous No.9022444]

>>9022426
The doll from Lovecrafts Innsmouth
>Play with me or you play with the fishies

[Anonymous No.9022522]

>>9022444
KEK it does have the Innsmouth look!

[Anonymous No.9022917]

[Anonymous No.9022969]

>>9022917
And?

[Anonymous No.9022997]

>>9022917
I wonder what her idea is? Maybe a color guard sort of shoot?

[Anonymous No.9023538]

>>9022246
> what are screen names

[Anonymous No.9023541]

>>9022019
So people can feel better about not being able to afford brand.

[Anonymous No.9023651]

>>9022426
kek this reminds me so much of pic related

>>9022917
I hate when people try to get you curious instead of just telling what's up

[Anonymous No.9023671]

>>9014605
Those disgusting wrinkles in the bodice, like wtf. Some couture work you got there.

[Anonymous No.9023716]

>>9022969
>>9022997
You guys are missing that it's posted in CLOSET OF FRILLS.

[Anonymous No.9024520]

>>9023538
>what is autism

[Anonymous No.9024688]

>>9020695
Except it's not tried on for a few minutes. They wear their stock OUTDOORS for hours for photoshoots for badly written blog entries.

[Anonymous No.9025157]

So Frances, or someone pretending to be Frances, is back again and up to her usual "is this totally not lolita dress lolita? I'm going to buy it no matter what you say" shenanigans.

[Anonymous No.9026285]

>>9025157
Link?

[Anonymous No.9026671]

I can't be the only one who's both confused and amused by this.

[Anonymous No.9026694]

Scalperchan is back. This time hawking Melty Sky. http://www.lacemarket.us/brand-new-angelic-pretty-melty-sky-jsk-2016/

[Anonymous No.9026736]

She is never going to live down calling us skinny bitches loool. Did M get blocked or did she leave??

[Anonymous No.9026744]

>>9026736
M was blocked/deleted

[Anonymous No.9026770]

>>9026736
Why is this girl a mod??

[Anonymous No.9026774]

>>9023538
> what is obvious sarcasm

[Anonymous No.9026775]

>>9026770
Jillian created the group - so lolitas would have a nice, safe and welcoming space online, away from all the mean lolitas

[Anonymous No.9027270]

Jillian's finally lost it. Appears to be purging frilly free for all, including kicking out the mods and most of the members.

[Anonymous No.9027618]

>>9027270
The group is deleted now???????? any caps from the purge?

[Anonymous No.9027630]

>>9027270
>flounces and makes own group because lolita should be lovelies
>people aren't lovelies
>flounces again

I'm not sure why people are so shocked; people who flounce out of a group tend to not be the most mature people.

[Anonymous No.9028787]

I can't describe what it is but something about this post rubs me the wrong way.

[Anonymous No.9028791]

>>9026694
>limited edition all the way from japan

[Anonymous No.9028811]

>>9028787
She posted in other groups too and basically ignored when everyone told her that it was an accident and easy to remedy.

[Anonymous No.9028819]

>>9028787
I'd take it with a grain of salt. Usually the types who live at home enough for their parents to do their laundry for them are itching for any reason to act angsty and pretend like they've got the worst parents ever.

[Anonymous No.9028821]

>>9028787
Reminds me of that one time my mum washed my red fantastic dolly and I freaked out, because all the dots were bled in. Well, it was about time I learned how to wash my own clothes.

[Anonymous No.9028908]

>>9028787
Well that didn't take long for this to be reposted on RC:U...

[Anonymous No.9029051]

>>9028908
All of the people in that thread saying that their parents are "abusive" for not giving them locks on their doors and going through their stuff REALLY pisses me off.

[Anonymous No.9029056]

>>9029051
Not going to touch on that chicks situation, but that in itself can actually be a sign of actual abuse. No respect for others people property and taking personal stuff from your kids -which is what they're describing in the comments- IS in fact part of being narcissistic.

[Anonymous No.9029066]

>>9028908
>Mommy issues: The thread

[Anonymous No.9029387]

>>9029056
Locks for kids doors though. No... They abuse that too much.

[Anonymous No.9029635]

>>9029387
Most bedroom door locks are just the type that open with a really generic key. You just put the key somewhere easy to get to for an adult and it's fine.

I grew up with locking doors and I can only remember one time in my childhood when the key was used and it was on the bathroom for one of my brothers because he was throwing a temper tantrum.

[Anonymous No.9029710]

>>9029635
If the parent can still get in then there's no point unless it's because of terrible siblings, or living in rape-city.

[Anonymous No.9029712]

>>9029635
To add, it's bit of a fire-hazard to regularly lock room doors. If there is a fire and the kid needs to be rescued, it's that much more time for the parent or firefighter to get in. It's really just not good practice. If the parent steals from the kid, they're not giving them a lock. If the parent wouldn't steal, then there's no point.

[Anonymous No.9029735]

>>9026671
>maid cafe at Animazement
Well I'm glad I didn't go to that.

[Anonymous No.9030929]

>>9028787
The joke seems like it was supposed to be more about how "her mom ruined it on purpose by washing it" but this whole thread turned into a competition of who can be the most abused for internet cred.

[Anonymous No.9030936]

>>9026736
Ok but what was the post this was on?

[Anonymous No.9031153]

>>9030929
It's still ridiculous. If their parents washing their clothes without permission is the worst form of "abuse" they've faced, I wish I was in their situation.

[Anonymous No.9031262]

>>9031153
Right??
I hate to be one of those "my abuse was worse than your abuse" types but I'm slightly offended.

[Anonymous No.9032195]

I would easily bet real burando on this 'dad' either being her sugar daddy or DDLG fetishist SO

cause if not, she needs the money for therapy

[Anonymous No.9032229]

>>9032195
I really don't know if her father bought her a dress as a gift or her sugar-daddy.

[Anonymous No.9032232]

>>9032195

I can't tell either. It could really be her dad, or she could be trying to low key her sugar daddy by calling him dad.

[Anonymous No.9032484]

>>9032195
I was about to get a bit indignant because my father has bought me brand dresses for my 16th birthday and HS graduation too, but then
>29
hmm

[Anonymous No.9032719]

I think I need a break from Facebook. I can't open a single group page for lolita without wanting to shake someone until their brain rattles around.

[Anonymous No.9034025]

Jesus fucking Christ. The cringe just got cringier.

[Anonymous No.9034056]

>>9034025
Where the fuck was this posted?

[Anonymous No.9034073]

>>9032195
I THINK it might be her real dad. Considering she got the dress in black and not a "baby" colorway. She doesn't sound like a total edgelord either and most people realise not to post their weird shit online by the time they turn 29. I will give her the benefit of the doubt for now

[Anonymous No.9034099]

>>9034025
She's a try hard edge lord. Good riddance bb P

[Anonymous No.9034110]

>>9034056
RC:U

[Anonymous No.9034113]

>>9034025
Who is this?

[Anonymous No.9034121]

>>9034025
Of course she's from Arizona. 90% of the people there are fucking batshit insane and need to be committed. Guess that hot desert hair got to her head.

[Anonymous No.9034132]

>>9034121
And an az mod jumped in to white knight her. Why do they all insist on being rabid drama whores?

[Anonymous No.9034151]

>>9034121
>hot desert hair
I meant air. In my rage I guess the hot desert air got to my typing as well.

>>9034132
Both of them to stop. Paige is just being an edgy tryhard fag, Candice is just being an asskisser.

[Anonymous No.9034152]

>>9034025
I did sometimes think about calling her out on BtB but I didn't because I knew she would be like "omg yasss bitch fuck the haters I'm #notbothered" and print it out to jack off to later.

[Anonymous No.9034153]

>>9034025
Can someone give caps to put this in context?

[Anonymous No.9034165]

>>9032195
>>9032229
>my dad and my daddy went halves on this dress for me

>>9034025
>someone mocking me is a blaze of glory.
U wot

>>9034152
this girl i went to school with always used to respond to ask.fm harassment on her facebook. Like she would answer an ask in the morning that was rude to her, then like 8 hours later, sometimes even the next day, she would post a selfie of her swearing at the camera with loads of like #dontgiveaFUCK #provingthehaterswrong etc hashtags and a rant about how she totally doesnt care about this shit, no way, why would you think i cared about it just because im still dwelling on it a day later....

[Anonymous No.9034300]

Okay here we go bc I needed a reason to procastinate. This was the original post to RC: U

[Anonymous No.9034302]

Dead horse and lots of stick as ALWAYS. Then C posted this as a reply which got the standard replica debate blah blah didn't screenshot bc it was boring.

[Anonymous No.9034303]

>>9034300Sorry cut the post bit off, "How do you guys feel about this?
Is it okay to shame people and belittle them for owning and wearing replicas?"

[Anonymous No.9034304]

Then P posted pretty soon after with all this and yeah

[Anonymous No.9034306]

[Anonymous No.9034307]

[Anonymous No.9034313]

[Anonymous No.9034314]

[Anonymous No.9034316]

>>9034304
Maybe I'm an edgelord too but aside from the obnoxious flouncing I agree with all of this.

[Anonymous No.9034317]

[Anonymous No.9034321]

>>9034316
Oh yeah I mean I agree about the art theft and desu about the fact that some people do need to lose weight even if it's just bc fat isn't healthy but she's annoying af so

[Anonymous No.9034327]

>>9034304
Quite flippant way of putting it, but I have to agree. The entitlement is real.

[Anonymous No.9034359]

Damn those three are cringy as fuck. R keeps on posting shit like lolololol you #lolcow on every damn thread she can. Not suprising the girls jumping down P's throat are edgelord tumblr itas

[Anonymous No.9034381]

Also only just joined RC: U and already starting shit

[Anonymous No.9034382]

>>9034381
She's gone back and commented on a couple older threads too

[Anonymous No.9034455]

>>9034327
I think she is misunderstanding why people are upset/reposting her. It's not exactly what she is saying, it's how she's saying it. Incredibly rude and entitled.

[Anonymous No.9034709]

>>9034359
She's also specifically trying to stir up shit in older threads.
>mfw R is in my comm
>mfw I have no face

[Anonymous No.9034806]

>>9034316
I think most people agree with her original sentiment. But then she went full retard about her leaving and blah blah im da #1 fat shamerrr. Like girl, no one cares. Just leave quietly you random edgelord.

[Anonymous No.9034816]

>>9034359
R is like a 12 year old who just discovered 4chan. Lolcow maymay topkek.

[Anonymous No.9034928]

>>9034304
I have nothing against her, but I think anyone who's been to a meet with her will agree that there's a pretty funny gap between her online and irl personas. Online, she's like this. irl she may say the same things, but mumbling slowly and looking down.

[Anonymous No.9034968]

>>9034928
I'll never really understand this. The other way around makes more sense since in IRL conversation there is much less downtime to review your thoughts and filter your response than there is online, so someone who is a total spaz in person can be very calm and collected in writing. But people who talk shit online but are awkward little dweebs in person? If anything, things you say online have bigger consequences than things you say in person because it can be logged and read back later. It doesn't make sense to me.

[Anonymous No.9034980]

>>9021332
Either way, then good; I can't stand Handler's obnoxious ass

[Anonymous No.9035028]

>>9034928
Been to many meets with, her, don't really agree? She talks normally... Like I get not liking her, she's tryhard and edgy and spends a lot of time #feelingherself but at least use real reasons

[Anonymous No.9035047]

>>9034968
>But people who talk shit online but are awkward little dweebs in person?
they are thinking the same type of things they post online, but are too pussy to say in person. this builds up a lot of pressure and they let loose online. when you are a nervous or shy little dweeb, what you can physically say is limited by the physical effects anxiety has on you. without the physical presence of other people, that anxiety no longer serves as a "filter" and then such people can feel almost elated and overconfident online.

i hope that makes sense. basically shy dweebs seldom learn appropriate interaction because they are controlled by fear, so they engage in juvenile behavior when that fear is absent because their social skills are literally immature.

[Anonymous No.9035056]

>>9015595
>scalloped skirt
I don't think you know what it is.

[Anonymous No.9035120]

>>9015549
What fabric did you get your petti made in? My hard netting ones have held up well but I'm not sure about her organza or voile.

[Anonymous No.9035153]

>>9034300
>>9034302
>>9034304
>>9034306
>>9034307
>>9034313
>>9034314
>>9034317
Thanks for the caps, anon.

Fuck this is why I'm always tempted to go lone lolita. Every time a lolcow leaves the comm I think "hmmmm maybe it will be better now" but then another steps up to shame the AZ lolitas.
Why can't you people just be fucking normal human beings?

[Anonymous No.9035175]

>>9034300
Fun fact about blue here, her likes keep popping up on my feed and they are mostly racist jokes.

[Anonymous No.9035606]

>>9034381
>i'm in that group

that group that literally doesn't exist anymore, you're late Janice

[Anonymous No.9035644]

Did the brandwhorez are meaniez girl delete her post? I didnt see it and i noticed a mod mentioned that deleting threads would result in automatic bans.

[Anonymous No.9035676]

>>9035644
Must have

[Anonymous No.9035702]

>>9035644
Yeah, the replica thread got deleted by the OP, and good riddance.

[Anonymous No.9036349]

Has any one else noticed the cross over between RC:U posts and cgl? I think the RC:U posters feel like they are being sneaky but in reality they are just outing that they talk shit on cgl.

[Anonymous No.9036387]

>>9036349
I admit I come to cgl all the time. Who cares?

[Anonymous No.9036397]

>>9022426
Legit thought that was a sphinx cat in a wig from the thumbnail.

[Anonymous No.9036399]

>>9028787
Does anybody else think people are going nuts over this in RC:U? Someone legit called the OP a sociopath.
Idk I thought it was dumb when I first saw it too.

[Anonymous No.9036418]

>>9036349
My friends and I are watching a girl from our comm turn into an argumentative troll there, it's too bad because we used to like her but we can't really trust her anymore. I'm frustrated with her because she's trying so hard to be funny and edgy but all she's doing is alienating herself from our community. I know the mods of our local comm have an eye on her too. I guess I'm just disappointed in her.

[Anonymous No.9036431]

>>9036418
Well damn this could be anyone.

[Anonymous No.9036471]

>>9036399
I totally agree. I was talking about this post with a friend (not to play the "who was more abused" game but she was actually abused by a parent) and she thought the whole thing was ridiculous. People really need to chill in that thread

[Anonymous No.9036474]

>>9036349
I bet my bottom dollar the OP for the misty sky caps on rc:u uses cgl. Which is fine, but ffs pick one or the other.

[Anonymous No.9036489]

>>9036474
This isn't a secret, she has posted as herself here before to address certain things about the group

[Anonymous No.9036577]

>>9036418
R?

[Anonymous No.9036581]

>>9036471
It's seriously ridiculous. Your parent left a room door open and the cat came in and peed on your blouse. That's called a *mistake*. Mom washes clothes for you? She's trying to help.
My parents would drag me out of the house by my hair, lock me out for hours so I would have to piss on the ground outside. Sometimes while I was out there, they would "clean my room" for me, which basically involved throwing out anything that was "out of place". This included my sales pile, about $300 worth of stuff, some of which had already sold. They just chucked this out the window to taunt me because I was sitting outside, it was wet and some of it got muddy and a blouse got grass stains. Then collected it in a trash bag which I was able to salvage, luckily
Although sometimes they would just lock me out all day because I had an Internet ban and my mom didn't trust me to not use her computer when they went out.
At one point when she was pissed off at me for something stupid, my mom went in to my room and grabbed a project I had been working on for months, lit a fire, and burned it. She also used to step on or break my things "to prove a point", but I never managed to figure out what that is.
I moved out after this started to escalate to physical abuse and threats of killing me.
There's no real point to all of this, I'm just pissy at that group for minimalising abuse issues with "my parents go in to a room in their own house and forget to close the door, the cat acted like a regular cat, abuse boo hoo hoo". And I don't want to be accused of being an abuse enabler or "someone who doesn't understand" when I call them a bunch of whingy babies for bitching about such menial things. I think intent matters most in these situations, and it is clear that their parents were trying to be nice.

[Anonymous No.9036635]

>>9036418
If it's who I think it is in really sad to hear that. I know her well and she is a really nice person who does a lot for the community.

[Anonymous No.9036659]

>>9036489
>>9036349
Well one of the screencaps in the OP is from here so it's pretty obvious. I actually post kinda rarely though.
The idea of picking one or the other is pretty silly tbqh, they have different cultures. Though I sometimes find it frustrating when RC:U has one opinion and /cgl/ is extreme opposite, like there's a bunch of people afraid to voice their opinion in one or the other. Which makes a lot more sense on Facebook than it does here...

[Anonymous No.9036667]

>>9036418
There's a girl in my comm who is super argumentative and contrarian ("Oh so you like [thing]? Well here is a list of reasons for why [thing] sucks!") and also quite young and insecure, and I dread the day she discovers RC:U or, god forbid, /cgl/. She currently spends her time leaving bratty comments on our community page and I wonder what would happen if she ever joins a community full of people who aren't prepared to just ignore her.

[Anonymous No.9036698]

>>9036349
Mostly stuff gets posted here because of the outrageous shit that goes on there. I don't deny using cgl if asked, I'm not sneaky about it. I'm also not one of the edgy bitches that tries to greentext or use cgl memes and "kek." That's just retarded and you should stop if you do that.

[Anonymous No.9036779]

>>9036387
Older lolita who have been in the fashion for a while won't respect you, basically. It used to be really taboo since it used to only be a place where people shit stirred and made fun of other people with zero non-drama content. It was basically where people who had no spine went to be dicks.

[Anonymous No.9036810]

>>9014521
Ugh, I can't fucking stand her. She such an edgelord, and suddenly she's a sjw wanna be. I can't believe the mods invited her back.

[Anonymous No.9036869]

>>9036810
It's interesting how often those two types go hand in hand.
Being an SJW is basically a license to harass people while feeling like you have the moral high ground, so it attracts a lot of bully edgelord types.

[Anonymous No.9036880]

>>9036698
>"kek"

i have a weird laugh which involuntarily uses the K sound and i swear i sounded this stupid before 4chan (and even before WoW)

[Anonymous No.9036891]

>>9036779
Older lolitas (30+) will not respect you if you admit willy-nilly to going on cgl as a way to distinguish yourself in the comm, because that makes you just look like either an edgelord grasping for attention, or has nothing else of merit in their lives to talk about. However, they will disclose their cgl habits to close friends in smaller, private meets. The older and more experienced lolitas will use cgl as a resource for news and information.

[Anonymous No.9036896]

>>9036880
One of the ways that laughing is "phonetized" in chinese is much kekeke, so it's not nearly as strange as you think. People like to forget that the "haha" sound isn't universal in representing laughter, but that's beside the point.

[Anonymous No.9036897]

>>9036891
merit of your* life to talk about

[Anonymous No.9036920]

>>9036891
Well yeah, I think most people don't respect it.
Personally I just mention I go on here if it comes up and sometimes there are good threads.

[Anonymous No.9036943]

>>9028787
This is why everyone went bat shit. V sort of fucked up, OP is having family problems (abusive situation) and that's why she's so upset about the snag.

[Anonymous No.9036980]

>>9036943
That was posted here before it made it to RC:U.

[Anonymous No.9036988]

>>9036943
Am I the only one wondering if OP is one of those girls who never washes her dresses, and that's why the mom did it?

[Anonymous No.9037006]

>>9036988
Eh, she repeatedly talked about her mother not liking her being in the fashion and breaking things she enjoyed.

[Anonymous No.9037030]

>>9036577
>>9036988
For sure OP told her mom she shouldn't put it in the washing machine. She said it was a delicate dress but the mom refused to listen to her, disregarded what she said and told her "if it was so expensive, it can totally be washed like that." And that's how it got those bad snags (as well as more damage not pictured.)

Honestly, even though I think it was stupid how she posted being upset on fb like it was a blog, i do think her feelings are valid. Her mom sounds nuts too, accusing her of shit and even torn up her floorboards because she thought the girl was hiding drugs. Tbh yeah maybe her situation isn't as bad as other abusive ones but being berated and having no boundaries or trust in a relationship with a parent can still tear you up inside. My own father is similar and physically abusive, you're stuck in a cycle of frustration, anger, fear, and paranoia; growing up like that for years can fuck you over.

Like I said, posting like that was childish and it's fine to point that out. V just did it in a terrible way that also was incredibly insensitive to the situation, since she probably shouldn't need to go into details about her personal life to rationalize being upset.

[Anonymous No.9037036]

>>9036667
Someone will tell her off and she will get butthurt. Our comm group mods have a private word with these edgy, bratty types, we don't just allow it on our comm page either. Why do you put up with it? Most everyone is in lolita to have fun and debates and arguments aren't usually welcomed except in a few online groups. No one likes a brat.

[Anonymous No.9037037]

>>9036891
Really? Because the older lolitas in my comm are the ones who talk about /cgl/.

[Anonymous No.9037067]

>>9035056
Better than a mussel shirt

[Anonymous No.9037068]

>>9036869
Same with MRA

[Anonymous No.9037079]

>>9037030
>she posted being upset on fb like it was a blog
uhhhh

[Anonymous No.9037083]

>>9036980
Okay, cool

[Anonymous No.9037222]

>>9036880
>>9036896
When it's a basic white girl from the USA who is trying to greentext on facebook, I'm not giving them the benefit of the doubt.

[Anonymous No.9037229]

>>9037222
What does this even mean.

[Anonymous No.9037233]

>>9037229
It means that the people saying "kek" on Facebook don't seem like the type to use a Chinese phonetization. It's not complicated. Unless you're a basic white girl from the USA who greentexts on Facebook.

[Anonymous No.9037234]

>>9037079
Not her personal fb, she spammed it in multiple different groups

[Anonymous No.9037237]

I always forget how autistic people on here can be

[Anonymous No.9037245]

>>9037234
And then when people gave her easy to follow advice she whined more and decided to enlist a friend to fix it instead. Why even ask?

[Anonymous No.9037295]

>>9037030
>being berated and having no boundaries or trust in a relationship with a parent can still tear you up inside
quasi-literally. e.g. emotional abuse significantly raises the likelihood of developing chronic migraines in a way physical abuse alone does not.

[Anonymous No.9037337]

>>9037067
10/10

[Anonymous No.9037355]

>>9037036
We have a few members who are even more annoying/creepy and our mods turn a blind eye to those too, so I think they just can't be bothered.

[Anonymous No.9037598]

Same girl who spammed her "abusive" home situation everywhere btw

[Anonymous No.9037614]

>>9037598
Where's this?

[Anonymous No.9037615]

>>9037598
You know, this chick was bragging about her weeb folks not too long ago
>my ~family~ gave me my nickname!
>haha we're all weeaboo garbage
>they're supportive of my hobbies
Girl must be bored with her life and trying to stir up some drama.

[Anonymous No.9037625]

>>9037614
I'm guessing rc:u given that's a typical A response to people who randomly go on about nothing

[Anonymous No.9037683]

>>9037625
I can't stand A, she's such a dumb edgelord bitch. Her comm hates her.

[Anonymous No.9037719]

>>9037598
Girls who are secretive about their hobbies may actually be child predators u guise!!!1

>>9037615
That chick who was supposedly named "Loli" by her family members? Eugh. I suddenly believe they might be abusive, though not in the way she thinks they are.

[Anonymous No.9037723]

>>9037683
Doesn't everybody in AZ hate each other?

[Anonymous No.9037868]

>>9037615
>>9037598

This girl makes me cringe just about every time I see her post something.

[Anonymous No.9037871]

>>9037868
That's what I thought!
I'm so confused why people are defending her so hard.

[Anonymous No.9037884]

Is that "transitioning so I can't afford your burando but I'll comment anyway!' person still going strong?

[Anonymous No.9037919]

>>9037868
I thought it was just me that rolled my eyes whenever I saw her post. She had to comment on every RC post, and now she's ramming her abusive family and her transtrender crap down everyone's throats. Be gone already.

[Anonymous No.9037920]

>>9037884
He was banned from CoF and RC:U but I think he's still in some of the shittier groups that I'm not in

[Anonymous No.9037924]

>>9037868
I checked out her fb out of curiosity.
Never have I felt more regret.

[Anonymous No.9037927]

>>9037924
The fuck is this?

[Anonymous No.9037929]

>>9037924
Wtf???

[Anonymous No.9037939]

>>9037924
Why can't people keep their disgusting fetishes private? I'm into some degenerate things too, but I don't post tons of pics of it and talk about it with my face attached. On face book of all places too.

[Anonymous No.9037948]

>>9037939
>Why can't people keep their disgusting fetishes private?

Why can't people keep their social accounts set to private?

[Anonymous No.9037949]

>>9037948
Because then they wouldn't get as much attention.

[Anonymous No.9037951]

>>9036891
Wtf are you basing this on? My comm has older lolitas and they don't hide cgl use.

[Anonymous No.9037968]

>>9037924
What even is going on? Was there any explanation for this?

[Anonymous No.9037983]

>>9037924
I saw it on her fb too, it's about incestuous rape. It didn't scream "fetish" to me, but it was awkward

[Anonymous No.9037984]

>>9037968
None. But I remember some of the comments. One person was literally triggered and L was just like "lol sorry" and some dude said he was aroused and she seemed more than ok with that.
I mean this is a girl who brags about being named after anime lolis.

[Anonymous No.9038227]

>>9037871
Probably because the people who think she's an annoying cringefest are all saying it here not on Facebook.

Also people who don't know who she is are probably the ones tripping over themselves to white knight her.

[Anonymous No.9038242]

>>9037924
So the pics are intentionally disturbing PSAs about domestic violence and child sexual abuse. So probably not her fetish, but this is still a thing too so I dunno what to think.

[Anonymous No.9038273]

>>9038242
Disgusting

[Anonymous No.9038349]

>>9037924
WHY THE FUCK IS THIS EVEN A THING
> inb4 rule 34