/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL

[Anonymous No.9118766]

Does /cgl/ really hate the ddlg community or only those who involve lolita into their kink?

Does /cgl/ blame the ddlg community for the perception lolita has in the west by normies?

How does /cgl/ feel about cgl actually being a ddlg term
>care giver little

[Anonymous No.9118780]

hate it. hate all of it. no one can convince me ddlg isn't fucked up. keep that shit away from lolita, away from public eye, and especially get it the fuck away from me.

[Anonymous No.9118782]

>>9118780 I agree. It's so gross and it sexualises children as well as ruining the rep of people who like j-fashion because now everyone thinks our fashion is some weird kink and people think it's okay to post/reblog our pics on gross ddlg blogs

[Anonymous No.9118783]

>>9118766
I fucking hate how "normalized" dd/l is on tumblr, same for cuckhold and incest.
Fuck tumblr

[Anonymous No.9118787]

>>9118766
I feel seriously so disturbed that cgl is an actual term for this shit.

[Anonymous No.9118792]

>>9118782
yeah, no one can convince me ddlg isn't predatory/abusive
>inb4 "but they're consenting adults!!!"
consenting adults that are roleplaying incestuous rape between a father and his much younger daughter ok ya sure

[Anonymous No.9118794]

>>9118780
Same. I feel the same way about other creepy kinks like feederism. You want to sexualise your issues rather than get psychological help fine, whatever, but have the common decency to keep it private and away from people who rightfully think that shit is disturbing and don't want anything to do with it. The reason people "kink-shame" you is because it is a legitimately shameful thing to be into. Normal people will never understand it, so stop expecting them to.

[Anonymous No.9118797]

yes
>/end thread

[Anonymous No.9118799]

>>9118797
>>>/b/

[Anonymous No.9118804]

Out of every kink in the bdsm communitt ddlg is the most disgusting and predatory. It's also full of the most pathetic men who think they have the intellect to be a real dom. Most daddy dorks are just regular losers who can't get a girlfriend so they get into ddlg since littles are usually the dumbest sluts on the planet and are easy to impress. Just wear a wrinkled button up shirt, cheap tie, faux leather belt and some ill fitting slacks and they are like "omg yes daddy!!!".
Ddlg is a blight on BDSM, gives ebophiles a way to pray on teenagers and hide behind "kink shaming" and they post their shit kink anywhere they can. Ddlg people have shit social skills like autists.
Also they ruined the term "lolita" and now the fashion is confused with their retard fetish.

[Anonymous No.9118806]

>>9118766
it's fucked up.

yeah it's okay if it's something personal between you and your partner, but it appears that the majority just can't be trusted to keep it in the bedroom - which is why this is even a discussion. if you give the dd/lg community an inch they take a mile. so i'm inclined to just say now that it's disgusting no matter what.

because it seems that most dd/lgers sexualize genuinely cute and sweet things like lolita it just makes the lot of you skeevy to even relate the subject to your own public persona. all you fuckers need to stop reblogging lolita shit on tumblr. i'm not even a lolita but i just love the pictures and it makes me rage to be followed/reblogged by porn blogs so i don't even bother to tumblr much anymore. which is probably fine but still. fuck you

[Anonymous No.9118809]

>>9118766
Yes we hate it
Yes we blame them
We hate this acronym association, who wouldn't?
happy?
Idk what you expected to hear, jfc

>>9118794
The main reason people "kink-shame" is because the kinky people are shoving the kink in other people's face and those other people are actually just saying "Keep your private shit private". Most of us do not give 2 shits what 2 consenting adults do in private but this kink's overshare is disgusting and way out of hand. And yes we know it is because 'littles' are needy little attention whores with fucked up boundaries. No one cares, just shut up.
Boohoo, u sham in' meeee
Bull-fucking-shit

[Anonymous No.9118811]

I can't for the life of me understand dd/lg or girls on IG pretending to be "sekushi lolis for oniichan." Like what is it about pretending to be a young girl being in a sexual relationship with an older family member that's so appealing? Like I'm one for the whole "I don't care what you do on your weekends as long as it doesn't affect me" but it seems like a lot of these people just like to inject into everything. What concerns me the most is that, not only are there actual underage girls in this kink, I've seen posts with older "littles" giving actual underage "littles" advice on how to send their "daddies" nude pictures and videos of themselves on tumblr.

I'm more into menhera than any other j-fashion so I can't speak for people in the lolita fashion, but I feel bad that they have unwilling association to dd/lg. From what I can tell, they already have issues with people thinking the fashion is some weird fetish thing and those people aren't helping that situation at all.

[Anonymous No.9118814]

It's a stupid fucking kink that only exists because it's currently trendy to have a kink, just like having some mental illnesses like OCD has been trendy or stupid crap like having gluten allergy is trendy. They get told time again and again to shut up about their creepy shit and they always respond with "kink-shaming" because it's also trendy to be oppressed and the people that like this kink are mostly straight cis white people who aren't oppressed anywhere else. Seriously, when someone says they're being kink-shamed it always means they overstepped other people's boundaries, and considering their excuse for their creepy shit is that they're consenting adults they should respect it when people don't consent to be involved in their fetish..

[Anonymous No.9118816]

>>9118766

Yeah ddlg can fuck right off. I knew a girl who took photos with a pacifier in her mouth and a seifuku on calling herself Japanese (transethnic tumblr bullshit) and a lolita. Miss me with that daddy issues shit.

[Anonymous No.9118818]

>>9118766
I don't necessarily hate what people do in the privacy of their bedroom even if it squicks me out and I'd never be into it.

The problem with the ddlg community is that it's almost like part of the kink is letting it spill into the public eye in some capacity to let other people "admire" the relationship or whatever fucked up thing they think they're doing because attention whoring etc.

Similarly to sissies who get off on being humiliated by others and thus constantly involving them in their fantasies, ddlg stuff spills over into non-fetish (and I hate to use this term but so be it) "safe spaces" if you will.

ddlg shits up our fashion tags, they reblog our shit and get our pictures associated with the fetish on pornography blogs, and because they're so vocal, the internet and public at large begins to confuse the fashion with the fetish.

ddlg is fucking cancer.

[Anonymous No.9118822]

>>9118818
Every fucking kink that tries to use lolita or jfash to fap is fucking disgusting and ignore the point of lolita overall.

[Anonymous No.9118823]

> likes lolita
> has kinks
> knows that kinks and lolita do not go together and have never participated in anything sexual while wearing lolita
> on a kink forum board
> new thread titled "Who likes loli girls" and I click on it because why not
> It's a picture of a pretty e-famous lolita with some past drama
> There's a video of her participating in kink
> I actually like her coords but I don't think she's sexy at all, but video is hot
> Dies a little

/cgl/ sometimes talks about her and I have such secondhand embarrassment about the video that I always close out of the thread or dump pictures until I don't have to see the conversation anymore.

[Anonymous No.9118824]

>>9118823
this fucking pasta

[Anonymous No.9118829]

I'm into bdsm but hate ddlg guts. I have always been very tolerant what comes to different kinks but ddlg creeps me out. They showe this shit down everyone's throats. No matter if it makes you uncomfortable.

[Anonymous No.9118831]

>>9118766
>Does /cgl/ really hate the ddlg community or only those who involve lolita into their kink?
Though it does make me uncomfortable, I only have problems when ddlg integrates their fetish into the fashion (i.e. using #lolitafashion). /cgl/ as a whole is another story. They're more likely to purge than they are to ignore.

>Does /cgl/ blame the ddlg community for the perception lolita has in the west by normies?
The name's connotations brought enough controversy to begin with and the ddlg community certainly isn't helping. When it comes down to it, I'd rather change the name of the fashion so avoiding this would be easier. Nippon be damned.

>How does /cgl/ feel about cgl actually being a ddlg term?
I changed my mind. I hate the ddlg community.

[Anonymous No.9118834]

I hate ddlg and I hate the tumblr community around it. I'm not even a lolita, I'm into other jfashions, but they've gotten their grubby paws on those too. So many "daddy buy me this!" and "give me cummies in this!" comments on my posts, it's just plain gross. They have absolutely no sense of decency. When I tried to resell some of my clothes someone asked me if they were "little clothes."

[Anonymous No.9118837]

>>9118766
Yes.
Yes.
Of fucking course.

[Anonymous No.9118838]

>>9118811
ATTENTION

They do it so people will pay attention to them just like actual toddlers bug the shit out of people until they outgrow it.

And you are correct, most people into lolita fashion despise the kink reference even marginally associated with it from the Nabokov book and try to keep as distant as possible from anything like this.

I think this thread is bait by a troll though and wish the janitor would shut it down.

[Anonymous No.9118842]

I pretty much agree with everything said here. ddlg is predatory in nature (regardless of what those involved will say). There's obviously something psychologically wrong with people that think this kind of relationship is okay. Anything that involves terms like "daddy" and "little girl" is fucked up. I don't get why people try to ignore the underlying pedophilia.

>>9118782
This pisses me off too. I follow plenty of j-fash blogs that have complained numerous times about those types of fetish blogs reblogging their photos and leaving gross comments.

[Anonymous No.9118843]

>>9118811
>Like I'm one for the whole "I don't care what you do on your weekends as long as it doesn't affect me" but it seems like a lot of these people just like to inject into everything.

That's because they consider it a lifestyle, not just a kink. And because it encompasses their entire life they think everyone should just accept it.

I remember watching this video on YouTube of this little complaining about how she told her friend about being a little and her friend thought it was nasty as fuck. Like no shit what did you think would happen? These people are delusional.

[Anonymous No.9118846]

>>9118792
This 100% just because a crime isn't being committed doesn't mean it's not a fucked up fetish.

[Anonymous No.9118852]

>>9118838
What? This thread doesn't look like bait. I think OP had a legit question about ddl. I just hope they are not into that themselves, that would be shameful.

[Anonymous No.9118855]

I honestly don't care. Don't have a tumblr so the only time I see people talking about it ect is when people are asking about it like a thread like this or someone is jokingly saying "daddy gave me cummies"

[Anonymous No.9118876]

>>9118766
I wish ddlg crowd would grab onto some other thing like nanchatte and leave lolita fashion alone. School uniform fetish is already a thing so they would have fellow kinky people to bond with and show their stupid pix to. Bodyline seifuku costumes for all! Everyone wins!

[Anonymous No.9118878]

ddlg is so associated with j-fashion and Lolita now that it affects google ad cents ads for websites that are aimed at reporting on those subjects.

[Anonymous No.9118882]

>>9118876
isn't it kind of related to nachatte already a lot of littles do post themselves in seifukus

[Anonymous No.9118902]

I really don't care if this is someone's fetish as long as they don't involve lolita at all (or at least don't tell anyone about it), but I hate that cgl is a term they have.

I kind of blame them, but honestly the blame is on us too at this point. We know the connotations the name of the fashion has, yet we as a community choose to keep the name anytime the subject of changing it comes up. I'm sorry, but we can't continue to call the fashion lolita then complain about people splicing it with ageplay or the misconceptions normies have.

[Anonymous No.9118903]

As someone who age regresses for therapy and likes jfashion, i hate the sexualization of this coping mechanism. its fucking gross.

[Anonymous No.9118909]

>>9118792
not into ddlg AT ALL,i but it's actually much less about sex than what tumblrinas make it think. It's more like a relation based on taking care and being taken care of. Also, Daddy is a title just like "Master" (but i really wouldn't be comfortablke calling my bf daddy that just sounds really weird to me). There is indeed a sex part in it but not much and they usually don't stay in their "little" phase while having sex. If they do i think it's sexualising children and it's gross just like these posts "uguu i'm on daddy's lap and i feel his peepee poking my princess parts uwu". Made me feel icky just by typing it.
I have two friends into it that are absolutely respectable people, know the limits, i only know all of it because they told me and we're really close enough. At first i thought it was disgusting but they explained it to me and seen this way it's...fine i guess.
But eh, i mean, i dress in frilly shit and i watch tentacle hentai and stuff stometimes so i can't really talk about weird

Final words: As long as people keep their kinky shit to where it belongs (in the bedroom,some space on dumblr,...) and are both (unless they're three or four or whatever) consentant adults and don't stick it on people's faces i'm ok with it.

[Anonymous No.9118918]

>>9118783
Considering the giant amount of anti ageplay blogs, I don't think so. It depends a lot on who you follow.

[Anonymous No.9118923]

>>9118822
There is lots of jfashion themed porn in Japan tho, cutyspank is almost 90% burando lolita abuse.

[Anonymous No.9118929]

DDLG is weird AF, but...

>Does /cgl/ blame the ddlg community for the perception lolita has in the west by normies?
Anyone who says yes to this needs to step back and seriously reevaluate. They certainly don't help us, but in case you guys forgot the style is called LOLITA. There's only one thing in western culture that word is associated with. Combine that with the way it looks, especially sweet, and obviously there will be people with the wrong idea. Can we stop acting like this is purely the work of the sinister DDLG community and acknowledge our own role in this?

[Anonymous No.9118940]

>don't really know what dd/lg is
>search for "ageplay" on tumblr
>see pictures
>laugh
>related searches: cgl
>cry quickly after

Thanks, /cgl/

[Anonymous No.9118947]

As far as I can tell it's just a combination of standard subdom shit and pretending to be 7 years old and incest is a niche part of it.
Hence why they call themselves littles and not daughters.
The crossover is purely them having similar fashion inspo as a couple of lolita and jfash styles. Who gives a fuck? If someone accuses you of being into ddlg niche shit, you automatically know they're some kind of pervert for even using the term.

[Anonymous No.9118949]

>>9118766
>How does /cgl/ feel about cgl actually being a ddlg term
>>care giver little
i knew a guy named BJ and no one ever said shit about what else those letters could stand for.

and the BJ's chain of stores still operates despite also sharing an acronym with one of the most commonly-acronymized sex acts.

it is not a big deal.

[Anonymous No.9118962]

>>9118949
this desu
while the ddlg is cancer /cgl/ is a board on 4chan not what we call the cosplay/ jfashion community

[Anonymous No.9118963]

>>9118929
It is though. The fashion was here long before tumblr and the recent outbursts of childish behavior. Just because they are using lolita stuff and reblogging it and trying to sexualize it doesnt mean we should just give up and rename the fashion because they will just use the other name because the clothes are the same. It will become "daddies cummies on my alice kei dress oh no!" or whatever we change it to because they are looking for attention like another anon said. All we can do is point out that they are spreading misinformation about their own kink and voilating the rules in the bdsm community they claim to be a part of. When you make someone look like they dont know what they are talking about they lose the "im being myself dont judge me" tumblr soap box to stand on. Its really honestly the rest of the ddlg community problem to control the PR nightmare that is the vocal few because if anyone should be upset its them. If they arent it shouldnt be a big problem for us either.

[Anonymous No.9118969]

>>9118780
>>9118782
>>9118783
>>9118794
>>9118804
>>9118806
>>9118806
etc.

You all are fucking full of shit, the pseudo-argument of "dont tell me that its 2 adults consenting because that doesnt make it right!!" is fucking retarded there is nothing wrong with people they are adults and aslong they dont hurt anyone, whats the problem? why is so bad? is just homosexuals all over again. This coments are /b tier shittalking.

And
>muh fashion they stealing muh fashion.
>they are perverts they can like what i like
>im so genuine they arent
>stop looking to my photos!!!!!!

You all sound like a fucking bunch of feminist-tumblerinas complaining about shit that does not afect you in anyway. Fucking Grow Up.

[Anonymous No.9118971]

>>9118969
spot the butthurt dude
>cock or gtfo

[Anonymous No.9118977]

>>9118969
Go cry about it to your pretend daddy you freak.

[Anonymous No.9118982]

>>9118969
>that grammar
Mind going back to grade school before posting anon Christ

[Anonymous No.9118983]

>>9118982
Maybe they were on their "little space" while writing that.

[Anonymous No.9118984]

>>9118766
Get out Loli Cvantal, or however the fuck you spell it

[Anonymous No.9118986]

>>9118971
But hurt? Kek.
You are the ones burtthurt in this thread hating people just because they like some role play in their sex.

>>91189632
And why dont just keep doing what you "love" and ignore that shit, why do you need such fucking validation, srsly if you really love it like it or whatever this shit shouldnt affect you

[Anonymous No.9118988]

>>9118986
So its on us to ignore it and not them to have some shred of decency and keep their sex life out of the community? double standards much

[Anonymous No.9118990]

>>9118977
And who said that i enjoy that shit?

>>9118982
Im still learning english, so whatever, funny thing is that in the internet the grammar argumment always come sooner or latter no matter where you are

[Anonymous No.9118992]

>>9118876
>>9118882
Oh god pls no. Nanchatte already has the problem of being associated with sexy schoolgirls by normies, we don't need any more shit

ddlg just needs to gtfo jfashion altogether.

[Anonymous No.9119000]

>>9118969
Pathetic.

[Anonymous No.9119006]

>>9118969
When people start associating a fashion to a sexually fetishist to the public, of course they're going to be upset because people outside of both will start to think the two are the same. So imagine wearing lolita because you like the fashion then someone kicking you out of a public area because they think you'really wearing it because you doing it for the kink. Lolita fashion hardly is taken seriously enough as it is no need to make it worse.

[Anonymous No.9119008]

>>9118969
found the pedo daddy. don't you have a teenager to go rape under the guise of roleplay?

[Anonymous No.9119011]

>>9118988
Of course it is, you dont keep close people you dislike do you? There is not double standars there, if they come to your community you kick them thats it, the true problem here is that /cgl overall lives from drama

[Anonymous No.9119018]

I wouldn't even give a shit about them at all if they didn't put pictures of me in lolita and Jfashion on their pornography blogs. I just don't want my face to be associated with this fetish/porn in general.

I know I can't stop it, and yes I'm the one who posts it online in the first place, but it still bugs me and makes me dislike the community in general.

[Anonymous No.9119020]

>>9119011
That not it were just telling them not to associate their kink with our fashion and community
its not keeping around the people you dislike its telling them to fuck off and them still hanging around you and then some asshat going well why don't you just ignore them even though they still go out of their way to associate with you we have a right to be bothered by that

[Anonymous No.9119030]

>>9119000
>>9119008
Nice argument. Kek

>>9119006
You have a point, but tyou forget that people associate sex with almost everything, you shouldnt call them freaks for the thinks they like, its just like the bunch of normies bulling the Lolita/Cosplayer/etc just because its weeabo shit, and thats bad.

>So imagine wearing lolita because you like the fashion then someone kicking you out of a public area because they think you'really wearing it because you doing it for the kink

Now i dont know... that happens? i find it hard to believe because even the police cant kick you out of public places if youre just hanging arround.

>Lolita fashion hardly is taken seriously enough as it is no need to make it worse.

And again with the validation, why do you need it so much? why cant you all just enjoy what you like??? I dont get it, and honestly some times i wish people in here didnt take lolita so fucking serious, i actually have a worst image of lolita from this boar than from the bblg tumblr

[Anonymous No.9119035]

>>9118988
They are like children having a tantrum. You ignore them and they cry themselves out. Ddlg stuff and the cringe bullshit on tumblr isnt safe sane or consentual its not a legit bdsm community or a kink. It has no real effect on actual ageplayers if they arent speaking against them. its just screaming tumblrinas that they are into one of the last taboo things on earth. Young people dont have counterculture so they invent it or cling to the last few weird taboo things in order to be the special snowflake they claim to be. Its just sad. If you really have to speak out the best thing to do is flat out tell them they arent respecting other people they are misinformed and possibly mentally ill and they should get help from a mental health professional.
If you really look at the things they are doing vs how legit people in a kink community do things its worlds apart.

[Anonymous No.9119040]

>>9118940
That's because cgl stands for "caregiver little" in that community.

[Anonymous No.9119048]

>>9119030
>again with the validation
I mean it would be nice to not be considered a pedophile or kinkster for wearing a poofy dress but thats just me
>people associate everything with sex
but we'd like to keep it outside the egl hell the j fashion community in general instead of having it come from within.
I don't get why its crime to tell them that jfashion is not the place for their kink

[Anonymous No.9119058]

>>9119018
I honestly have never seen a lolita/jfashion picture on a porno site. Now blogs are full of cosplay and lolita yes but im pretty sure that more stright males share those inthere. Now i get that i bugs you as a person even as a community, but why the hate? why do you take it so personal? cant they actually like it?

>>9119020
In meetings you just need to cal the police or security they will kick them out, online (facebook, forums, etc) you block them or ban them is that easy. thats not excuse, i think your problem is that you dont realize that is not personal, ddlg just like the dresses and stuff, ins not as personal as you want it to be, and tahts the thing you can tell people what they should like and what they shouldnt

[Anonymous No.9119077]

>>9119058
No ones telling people into ddlg that they can't like lolita. People are telling them not to associate their shitty kink with the community or else people will get the wrong idea.
>inb4 validation
its not about that we just don't want more ddlg people coming in thinking its a place for their kink when it clearly isn't.
Theirs a difference between liking someones pictures and getting off to them especially when their wasn't any sexual intent to them

[Anonymous No.9119081]

>>9118834
>>9118834
The word "cummies" never fails to make me laugh
Its like tendies but for girls

[Anonymous No.9119082]

>>9118949
Not to mention dicks (sporting goods) who often makes risqué slogans and sale tags

[Anonymous No.9119083]

>>9119035
I'd actually be interested to know what the kink community says about this tumblr-style daddy-little situation being associated with the BDSM community at large. Since these tumblerina babies have no distressing and are usually very much NOT practicing SSC behavior, I'm betting the actual D/s community doesn't like them much either. Those daddy doms are a real horror show.

[Anonymous No.9119084]

>>9119048
Im just happy knowing im not one, people will judge you for evreryting they can asfar as i understand, kinda fell you tho as a men that sews and likes lolita dresses i get the pedophile stare every time.

Again, you cant tell people what should they like "hey you are a ddlg you cant put on this because its lolita or ita or whatever"
Its not a crime but why is a crime for them to like what they like, its like the black guys trying to lecture a japanese family about cultural apropiation in some museum bacause they didint wanted people to wear kimonos, because only japanese people wear kimonos right?

[Anonymous No.9119086]

>>9119083
*no discretion
Sage for outlaw autocomplete

[Anonymous No.9119088]

>>9118969

[Anonymous No.9119091]

>>9119084
No ones telling them not to like lolita or that they cant participate people are telling them to keep them that theirs a place for their kink and the lolita community is not it

[Anonymous No.9119093]

>>9119058

It's the online equivalent of walking to someone in public and telling them you masturbate to them.

It's gross and shows a complete disregard for the other person.

[Anonymous No.9119095]

>>9119058
>Now blogs are full of cosplay and lolita
I am well aware and I have no issue with these types of blogs in fact I usually will look at them for inspiration. The things that just gets me is when my photo is night next to a gif of some girl asking her daddy to spank her harder or what have you especially since some photos of me were taken when I was a minor.

I don't like having my photo up on these blogs as it makes me uncomfortable and if any of my relatives, coworkers etc. where to stumble upon that kind of thing it would be much more difficult to explain and an added bonus of being embarrassed.

>but why the hate?
I don't really hate the kink itself desu more just what I explained above.

>why do you take it so personal?
Because it is a photo of me. On a blog also filled with porn.

>cant they actually like it?
of course they can but it's still in bad taste.

[Anonymous No.9119097]

>>9119084
>, kinda fell you tho as a men that sews and likes lolita dresses i get the pedophile stare every time.

And you don't see how that opinion is reinforced by these kind of creeps?

[Anonymous No.9119104]

>>9119097
He just fails to grasp why /cgl/ at least has a problem with ddlg anon just think were being a bunch of hateful tumblrinas when they actually does stuff that gets the jfashion community and theirs confused

[Anonymous No.9119106]

>>9118969
>being so retarded that you compare homophobia to people not liking the fact that you like whacking it to girls pretending to be 7

that is, if this isn't the dumbest bait ever

[Anonymous No.9119123]

>>9118909
You're really naive and clearly have never had to interact with these people outside your bubble. You have no idea what it feels like to have your posted image that you worked so hard for stolen, the reposter is roleplaying with you instead of talking, and attributing more and more garbage to you. Furthermore the pervert blaming you for daring to post anything in the first place. "You obviously were asking for it."

To anyone who is an outside in the lolita fashion -- ie someone who hasn't invested time & money in wardrobe, worn in front of your family, worn it to communities... you really have no idea what it's like. Drawing it, collecting images, and understanding the aesthetic isn't even close. You should listen to people who actually go to meets and are wearing it. Not idiots who own like 2 fanplusfriend bodyline taobao bleh dabbling nerds with idealistic tendencies. Saying we take it too seriously? We're real people, not illustrations of girls on the internet. This shit is killing the lolita fashion community right now. It was born on the internet in the west, and it will die without the internet for others to inspire.

What no one is saying is: everyone is scared to post outfits publicly now their outfits because 100% they will be found an reposted to fetish sites. Prob ddlg. Especially on tumblr. Especially if they're pretty.

The popularity of this ddlg movement also came from the internet. Yeah its been around before, but recently it has become mainstream. Thanks martinez and katy perry shit. The interplaying of lolicon, lolita, creepy little girl stuff, accessibility of japanese style cute clothes, and westerners re-interpreting all these archetypical pretty/pure young girl characters on their dash board. Tumblr users can craft a unique story from whatever combo they want and they brewed up this mess. It's like visual fanfiction for them.

TLDR? Lolita needs an iron gated community to keep off the slobbering masses of perverts on the internet

[Anonymous No.9119131]

>>9119123
>>9119123
It's made me stop posting on my blog or Instagram for sure. I am so tired of seeing my picture next to diaper/ddlg/age regression fetishists.

I'm not against these blogs being run but I wish they would post their own content and stay within their own fetish communities instead of interacting with the jfashion communities.

[Anonymous No.9119134]

>>9118963
I see what you're saying, but if the fashion is called something other than lolita then normal people won't see it as sexual in nature. First of all, most normies have no idea that many in the DDLG community like lolita, just the name "lolita" alone is enough for them to assume there's some weird sexual shit going on. Secondly, if an outsider is aware of lolita within DDLG then they're gonna be a lot more likely to believe there's no direct connection if it's not named something like lolita. It's hard to make the case that there's no direct link between ageplay and lolita when the fashion is named fucking lolita.

[Anonymous No.9119151]

>>9118969
it's essentially normalizing the sexualization of minors all while relating itself to lolita fashion. so yes, it is hurtful because it attracts predators to lolita communities. your comment was truly ignorant but 10/10 for rustling jimmies by comparing homosexuality to getting spanked in poopie diapers

[Anonymous No.9119158]

I feel the same about ddlg people as I do about sissies. Stay the fuck away.

[Anonymous No.9119161]

>>9119134
Pretty much this. The name lolita has the connotation that it does because of the book and it's understandable that normies connect it with something sexual. Doesn't make it right but that's how it is.

>>9119131
I do wish there was a way to combat this. Nobody wants to have their normal picture associated with that kind of content.

[Anonymous No.9119166]

Stuff like this is disgusting. It's predatory and sexualizes children. I used to live above a fat lazy fuck who drank all day and bought nothing but 18 "teen" pigtail-wearing porn magazines with his welfare cheques. Ugh. He would be so happy with this trend now, he can finally be a pedo without it being illegal. Get this shit out of my face.

I see this stuff all over AliExpress, especially this image.

[Anonymous No.9119171]

>>9119151
So now ddlg is pedofilia? asfar as i know thats ilegal and betwen a minor and an adult, did i mis something? why are they no being arrested? and how are they sexualizing minors without minors?

I compared the situation retard is the same ignorant people like you saying a man cant like it in the ass because "muh valors, Ist antinatural!!!! its inmoral!!" just as you are doing right now. Just because you dont like it or aprove it it doesnt make ir wrong.

[Anonymous No.9119173]

Better hold on to your assholes with all the "daddy's little monster" cosplays that will be rolling around after suicide squad is released. They are already selling the shirts at hot topic.

[Anonymous No.9119174]

>>9119171
Its sexualizing child and infanthood

[Anonymous No.9119177]

>>9118766
I hate it, but I think only sweet lolitas have to really deal with the association so I don't feel targeted by this problem. But I have another problem with ddlg outside of lolita: the sexualisation of children and everything related to it. It's not okay when a young teen searches for "kitten" or "princess" (with safe search on) and encounters sexual content. And I HATE how lolita is a nsfw tag on tumblr, because of nymphets and littles. Just imagine a 14 yo newbie-lolita searching for inspo on tumblr and she has to take safe search off to find anything at all. And then a whole wave of sexual content floods her screen.

[Anonymous No.9119180]

>>9119030
Only fucking middleschoolers and stupid teens associate everything with sex. There's something clearly really wrong with you.

If your argument is that "sex sells", wrong demographic, faggot.

[Anonymous No.9119185]

>>9118969
Spotted the homophobic child abuser cunt.

[Anonymous No.9119186]

>>9119171
No
They can do whatever they like in privacy, that's not the objection and you miss the point.

We do not want them joining our groups, stealing our photos, speaking their sex topics to us. And this is what many are doing. We want them to stay away from us with their sex activities topics.
This is a reasonable request.

Would you like someone to come to your bowling league speaking constantly of horse-racing and dragging this topic up when you are trying to bowl a game or adding scores or planning the bowling tournament and then they are blogging the horse-racing results on your bowling page? No.
It's that ridiculous and rude, perversions aside.

[Anonymous No.9119210]

>>9119095
The point i was trying to make was that im sure more guys (or girls one never knowns) not in the ddlg share thos pictures, sorry for not being clear. Its completly undestandable the wey you feel tho, but in the end your fotho isnt lewd right? i mean its the what people would say and i dont want to get into that

Yeah i wasnt referring to you, is just thatthis thread is so full of irational hate and bullshit i had to say it, sry about that

Thats was thing that not only happens to cosplayer lolitas etc, and im not saying you deserve it, no, but sadly internet has been like that since the beginnig

Well you said it, "taste" as a lolita you should know that even your fashion can be seen as bad taste for others with out any reason at all.

>>9119097
No im pretty sure 99% of the people staring or judging have no idea what ddlg is, its more people that dont give a fuck and judge others by his standar of morality and what is correct for a men or a women to do, wear or act, just like most of people in this thread does including you.

[Anonymous No.9119212]

>>9119171
it's not the same as a man taking it up the ass, because that involves (ideally) consenting adults in the privacy of their own bedrooms. likewise if consenting adults participate in ageplay in private, that's one thing. but the reason this is even a topic is because the dd/lg-ers can't keep it to themselves, and continually involve underaged persons and also non-consenting adults by stealing their photos for fetish blogs. so yes, that is wong. perhaps you will able to better validate and defend your nymphet fantasies at http://www.tumblr.com

[Anonymous No.9119215]

>>9118766
>How does /cgl/ feel about cgl actually being a ddlg term
I was so happy when I found this out. I don't care about ddlg stuff but I think it's hilarious that cgl is now associated with retarded shit like that and I think gulls deserve it.

[Anonymous No.9119223]

>>9118809
I think they're saying that because they don't participate in the social norm that you do of "keep private things private" believe it or not that is not a motto for everyone that everyone follows. There are no real golden rules in life, you know that right?

[Anonymous No.9119225]

>>9119210
Yeah I know they do. Sissies, role-players etc. also share my photos but for some reason, at least from what I see, it happens the most on ddlg blogs. Probably just because it is a "popular kink" right now.

>internet has been like that since the beginnig
yeah I am aware which is why I debate posting my outfits at all now.

>bad taste for others with out any reason at all
I suppose what I meant by taste was that it come across as disrespectful when people do those things.

[Anonymous No.9119226]

>>9119210

[Anonymous No.9119231]

>>9119134
This. As much I'd like to ignore everyone else and have pride in the fashion's roots, the cultural impact of Nabokov's work is to deeply ingrained in the west. I know everyone says the community will never agree on a substitute name, but is it that crazy to just call it EGL?

...Please tell me that isn't fetish slang too.

[Anonymous No.9119233]

>>9119223
Most of the BDSM and fetish community strongly believes in NOT involving outside people in their activities without consent. They take it seriously as a responsibility.
Where is it ever the correct behavior to push your sex life in the face of another person if they do not wish to see it or speak of it? Nowhere.

[Anonymous No.9119235]

>>9119186
I have said this like 3 times already you all keep saying that they are invading you, but the truth is that there is a plenity of ways to stop that, online and in rl, i can give you a fucking easy example if this boar was flodded with that shit the mods an janitors would inmediatly delete them, because they dont belong in here easy as that, now the problem is that you want sites like tumblr to be like some kind of community or im not sure what, when the very nature of that place is to be open for everyone (also its shit why are you people even caring about that shit hole)

And your example about the bowling is just fuckign stupid srsly, if some one is disturbing your group just like that you tell the manager/security and he do something, if the asshole is in your group you kick him out. The same in a private meeting you just kick them out, for instance you dont let them in.

[Anonymous No.9119237]

>>9119081
I fucking hated seeing "tendies" on /ck/ for like a year and a half jesus fuck I'm glad that is over.

[Anonymous No.9119239]

>>9118878
yo, isn't there a way to report that shit??

[Anonymous No.9119240]

>>9119215
>gulls deserve it
you are pretty much a gull yourself by posting on /cgl/

[Anonymous No.9119242]

>>9119235
your are one of the most dense fuckers ever don't you think we've tried to tell them to leave or to get rid of them? or told them not to relate their kinks to our community like we get that their are plenty of communities on tumblr. like they have a community on tumblr we also have a community on tumblr. What we're trying to tell them is if they're going to be in our community don't bring theirs with it. Is your common sense as bad as your english as well ?

[Anonymous No.9119243]

>>9119235
And when they steal our photos?
Would you like a sex fetishist to refer to sex topics using a photo of your sister, your mother, maybe your daughter?
Also you are not even a lolita, you are some outsider coming in to try to school us and failing in every post when you cannot even know how it feels so why are you even here?

please just fuck off and go away. Srsly.

[Anonymous No.9119244]

>>9118783
uhh, it's cuckold and you can blame /tv/ for that shit, friendo.

[Anonymous No.9119247]

>>9118823
How many times are you gong to bring up this story and not produce any links cuz "I don't want to start dramz"

[Anonymous No.9119248]

I have no problem at all with the fetish itself, I'm in rapeplay and sadism so I have no room to talk shit. However, I detest the cunts on tumblr who spew their fetish roleplaying all over other people's content. It's not consensual and it's not okay. To be honest I would consider it a pretty vanilla 'kink', it's only an exaggeration of most hetero relationships in our society imo.

[Anonymous No.9119249]

>>9118969
Its really ironic that someone into this shit is telling us to grow up.
Go cry to daddy.

[Anonymous No.9119250]

>>9119247
it's a pasta anon

[Anonymous No.9119252]

>>9119212
Sorry to break it to you but under age sex happens all arround the world, man do it, women do it, homosexuals do it just beacuse this people chose to role play doesnt mean they are evil sexual predators, just a bunch of cristian priest fuck children for fun.

In not looking for validation, i dont know what makes you think that. but whatever you are pretty dumb.

>>9119185
Iwas defending the homosexuals in that post how can you be that retarded.kek

[Anonymous No.9119258]

>>9119252
>implying sex between to teens is the same a sex with a minor and an adult
how fucking stupid can yeah get

[Anonymous No.9119263]

>>9119252
your writing seems to display some serious issues that you are desperate to validate, otherwise you would have fucked off already.

[Anonymous No.9119266]

>>9118766
Honestly as someone who has this kink it's such a mixed bag. Obviously it's fine in private, and I don't even mind the tumblrs, it's just a niche community that can be easily avoided. But when they start reblogging lolita pictures or otherwise incorporating it into their fetish I think that's crossing a line for sure.
Also when they're obviously about it in public. Heard a girl LOUDLY calling her bf daddy in the store, acting childish and shit, right in front of kids. Please. Dont.
>Does /cgl/ blame the ddlg community for the perception lolita has in the west by normies?
Nah, that's the creepy sissy dudes. Honestly I've seen lolita in ddlg blogs from time to time, but it seems like they don't really wear lolita so often, more like stuff in op pic

[Anonymous No.9119269]

>>9119186
>>9119235
>>9119171

This poster is highlighting the core issue. Non-lolitas think we can butt them out. Think we can just ignore it.They have no idea what it is actually like or how the lolita community works. You are assuming from the outside. As a normal man, though maybe nerdy, you have literally no idea.

These people latch onto you and fantasize about your life and how they can take you over and self-insert themselves. They can't disassociate fantasy from reality. The problem is online stalking and online identity. Once these images start circulating there's no way to take back your reputation from them. You're their dream ideal girl. You aren't real. It can have negative influences in your life because a pervert has stolen your image and refuses to take it down. Not only that he is rewriting whatever it was you were trying to creatively express.

Often time these reposts won't get deleted, unless you really understand how the talk to the social media outlet correctly. And that can take months at times to get it removed, if only partially. And you have to go through a long process on multiple outlets and treat it like your job, spreadsheets and everything. You have to change your name, your phone... everything if you get targeted.

You have no idea what hardship it is to protect your privacy with perverts. Do not for one instant tell me this makes them honest normal people with slightly spicy interests. What kind of person would do this to someone else?

[Anonymous No.9119271]

>>9119252
>>>/b/
>>>>/reddit/

[Anonymous No.9119272]

TFW girls now are unironically pandering the patriarchy for handouts...

[Anonymous No.9119275]

>>9119269
this. all of this.

[Anonymous No.9119277]

>>9118818
Sometimes I have half a mind to start a couple throwaway accounts and shit up the dd/lg and cgl tags with kitchen sinks and cacti.

[Anonymous No.9119280]

>>9119277
I would love you forever if you did this anon.

[Anonymous No.9119289]

>>9119266
This. They rarely post themselves, they reblog idealized images for feeding their sex fantasies and role playing and even often retail them with fetish tags. I imaging many WISH they wore lolita and would like their daddies to buy it for them but we have all seen that most of their daddy doms are washout betas that do this power exchange for their ego. So they also have no boundaries. Since so many littles also reblog thinspo, I assume they are mostly chubby otherwise shy older teens or young twenty somethings who aren't very attractive but wish they were so they 'collect' pretty photos.
The first time I was reblogged by a little, I was shocked and very grossed out. I block them.

[Anonymous No.9119290]

>>9119277
Do it, anon.

[Anonymous No.9119293]

>>9119289
I block them too but it doesn't take your photo off of their blog or stop other kinksters from reblogging it sadly.

[Anonymous No.9119296]

In any case it's easier to just have kinky sex, than dress in quality lolita fashion. Especially to entry level college kids. They have way more quantity than us and that's why they're overpowering the lolita tag. Sucks

[Anonymous No.9119298]

>>9119252
you are the dumbest motherfucker I've seen around here in a long time

[Anonymous No.9119306]

>>9119240
Except I'm not like you at all. You're just assuming I am. The only thing we have in common is that we're on this board as anons.

Also I don't tell people I go on /cgl/ - cause why the fuck would I? Do you go around telling people that? Shit, I've always referred to this place as the cosplay board. Even on facebook, I just say I go on a gossip site or a cosplay board because most normies don't know about 4chan or they do and don't care because they're normies so they go on Reddit.
The only thing to be worried about here is the online usage. And that's why I think it's great because I want this place to be associated with something bad because this place is exactly that, it's bad.

And yes, I'm fully aware I participate in the shitfest. I'm a martyr for my sins, anon, are you happy yet daddy?

[Anonymous No.9119310]

>>9119269
>>9119275

[Anonymous No.9119333]

>>9119289
>They rarely post themselves
Yes! Why can't they generate their own content? They know we hate being associated with their fetish but keep stealing lolita photos instead of creating their own, original images.

[Anonymous No.9119339]

>>9119306

> I'm not like the other gulls :^)

[Anonymous No.9119370]

>>9119333
let's all yell theft?