Lolita = fashion for (secret) sluts?

[Anonymous No.9353364]

hey /fit/ here

Why do so many seagulls claim that "there is NOTHING sexual about lolita fashion!" when it clearly is sexual? Why do you all deny that you wear it to get guys? Do you think we don't notice when you strut around with your rufflebutt and boobloaf hanging out?

You remind me of those women who claim that there is NOTHING sexual about pole dancing.

Do you not feel sexy wearing your favorite coord? You can lie to us, but please don't lie to yourselves.

[Anonymous No.9353366]

This is bait but. You're confusing cute with sexy. We feel cute. Not sexy.

[Anonymous No.9353367]

>>9353364

[Anonymous No.9353374]

>>9353367
Explain to me why there is so much lolita fashion porn then? Care to guess what happens to this one wearing milky planet?

[Anonymous No.9353375]

>>9353374
Bc men are scum.

[Anonymous No.9353377]

Okay I will bite, but please know that your bait is very very low in quality.

I have felt beautiful, elegant, cute, princess-like or uhh so gothic depending on what style I was wearing, but I can say with confidence that I have never felt sexy when wearing Lolita.

[Anonymous No.9353381]

>>9353364
I feel pretty in lolita. I'm doing it because I like feeling frilly and pretty.
I actually assume more people think I'm weird than I'm trying to be sexy.
Sage because bait.

[Anonymous No.9353382]

>>9353374
there's porn of anything and everything, especially JAVs.

[Anonymous No.9353385]

>>9353364
OP why don't you also tell us about how women deserve to get raped when they wear certain things.

[Anonymous No.9353387]

If lolita isn't sexual, then why is it infested with ageplayers?

Why can't I go on the Tumblr or Instagram 'lolita fashion' tags without seeing it all over the place.

Also please notice in my OP pic that the cute lolita is wearing AP Cosmic. That is the legit stuff, not some Oo Jia replica trash.

[Anonymous No.9353389]

>>9353385
That's a huge fucking leap holy shit lmao
Talk about feeding the god damned trolls.
Way to be dramatic.

[Anonymous No.9353390]

>>9353364
I never really understood what people found sexual about lolita, but this picture does things.

[Anonymous No.9353391]

>>9353387
Because people don't understand what the fashion is and assume what it is.
And then we have people like you who tell everyone else it's age play, so more people assume that it is.
And it's just a vicious cycle of uninformed idiots thinking it's age play when it isn't.

[Anonymous No.9353392]

>>9353391
Only sweet is age play.

[Anonymous No.9353393]

>/fit/ here
>can name ap prints

ok

[Anonymous No.9353394]

>>9353387
As someone who is only vaguely aware of this whole ageplayer thing, I would think ageplayers discovered Lolita due to the unfortunate name and then misappropriated certain things.

[Anonymous No.9353395]

>>9353377
Yes, what I posted is bait. Do you think that I cannot be sincere with what I said at the same time?

I don't believe you though. Never? Not when your walking down the street in your best coord and turning the head of every guy? I really don't believe you.

[Anonymous No.9353396]

>>9353392
Well I'm classic, so... There's that.

[Anonymous No.9353397]

>>9353392
It most certainly is not.

[Anonymous No.9353398]

>>9353395
this isn't lolita

[Anonymous No.9353399]

>>9353395
Lol, like I'm turning the head of every guy because they think I'm sexy/beautiful/whatever, they look because they think I'm weird.

[Anonymous No.9353401]

>>9353395
Agreed, not only are you posting bait, but you posted something that isn't lolita. What you posted is called 'nymphet' fashion, and it's purpose is to entice people. That type of look is strongly tied with ageplay.

[Anonymous No.9353402]

>>9353393
I was wondering the same thing. lol

[Anonymous No.9353404]

I get the feeling that OP is sort of projecting. He sees lolita as sexy, possibly because of latent pedophilia, and he assumes all lolitas are sluts who are into age play.

[Anonymous No.9353406]

>>9353395
she looks like a low quality hooker and is wearing my favorite offbrand piece

fucking REEEEEEEEEEEE

also nayrt but nope, never felt sexy, only cute and adorable. Sometimes elegant while wearing classic. Something about wearing a bunch of layers and being totally done up is the opposite of sexy, my man. Why the hell would I want to fuck when I'm all made up? I'm not gonna ruin my appearance, which I've worked on so much, for some bonin'. Not gonna happen. Sex is the last thing on my mind while wearing lolita.

[Anonymous No.9353408]

>>9353404
I agree about the projecting but I'm leaning towards the OP being an ageplayer herself.

[Anonymous No.9353411]

>>9353393
I have been here since Fitness Fridays in 2012. I literally know Miyu/Laura. I've picked up a lot over the years.

I think it's sad that you can't be honest with yourselves. Most lolitas are so sexually repressed that they gasp at the thought that their fashion is sexual.

This thread is only bait for the uptight post-2012 seagulls.

You know that a EGL LJ mod was once caught doing ageplay porn, right?


Also for above: this is what happens to cute milky planet lolita.

[Anonymous No.9353420]

>>9353411
she's not wearing a blouse or a petti

not lolita

[Anonymous No.9353423]

>>9353411
>>9353374
JAV code, please?

[Anonymous No.9353424]

>>9353420
It's 'lolita' catered toward men. The parts of lolita they like minus the parts they don't like. Not very lolita at all.

[Anonymous No.9353426]

>>9353411
Someone who dons a Lolita dress for one porn shoot is not actually a Lolita and I couldn't care less about it. It says nothing about the people who actually wear it as clothes as opposed to fetish gear, especially since Lolita porn is not aimed at Lolitas but at men who think Lolita is sexy, of which there undoubtedly exists a certain amount.
By your logic, all teachers should admit that their job is sexual because there's tons of teacher porn out there. Some people also have fantasies of having sex on a train, does that make trains inherently sexual?

[Anonymous No.9353427]

Horrible bait aside, I find wearing lolita is a turn off for guys rather than a turn on. Since I'm a filthy classic I'm pretty sure the only thing going through their head when they see me is their grandmother's couch. Not exactly sexy.

[Anonymous No.9353434]

>>9353427
But, assuming it's done well, classic is the most attractive style.

[Anonymous No.9353440]

>>9353399
This is your own insecurity, rather than reality. So long as your coord is not an OTT parade float, you will draw the right kind of attention, and guys will look because you appear attractive to them, not because you are dressed 'weird'.

I'm often amazed at the cluelessness of women, and how they cannot understand that if they look beautiful, and dress beautifully, they will draw the attention of men. It's an endearing fault sometimes.

Look at Fanny Rosie. She is dressed in both a classy way, but also an attractive way. I would wreck that so hard she couldn't walk the next morning, but sadly I hear she's married.

[Anonymous No.9353442]

>>9353440
>I would wreck that so hard she couldn't walk the next morning

Honestly almost no lolita would ever want to fuck in a coord

[Anonymous No.9353446]

>>9353440
Just because YOU find something sexual, don't mean that the intent is inexpertly sexual.
A foot fetishist would find someone wearing flip-flops sexually attractive. But that does not mean people wearing flip-flops are doing it for sexual attention.
TL;DR OP has a fetish for lolita and thinks all lolitas are sluts because he happens to find them sexy.

[Anonymous No.9353447]

>>9353446
And I meant "inherently" not inexpertly. GG autocorrect

[Anonymous No.9353455]

I'll bite. I don't feel "sexy" in lolita, but sure, I feel pretty/cute/elegant/whatever. That being said, the only time I've been hit on in lolita is by other girls, or the occasional cosplayer guy. I get a lot less attention from men when I'm dressed up.

But I'm also a huge lesbo who's engaged to a woman. I do enjoy my fiancee telling me how pretty my outfits are, but she doesn't see it in a sexual way either, and I'd never think of fucking in brand or anything like that.

[Anonymous No.9353456]

>>9353404

Lolita fashion has always had pedophilic undertones.

Do you all conveniently block out that your fashion is named after a book in which a young girl seduces and manipulates an older man?

Why would a documentary use a cover of a women dressed in sweet, while asking if all men are pedophiles?

Really makes you think...
Also I swear to Mary mother of God if the tyrannical janitor cunt deletes my thread before I'm finished educating the repressed lolitas I will go straight to Hiro.

[Anonymous No.9353458]

>>9353456
>dat filename
kek

Even if it does have sexual undertones none of us well ever admit it because we don't want our fashion viewed as fetishwear, because then wearing it would be embarrassing.

Fact is, even if some people find lolita sexually appealing, the VAST majority of actual lolitas do not view the fashion in a sexual light. We are dressing for ourselves.

[Anonymous No.9353459]

>>9353456
Straight to Hiro with you. Go. Now.

[Anonymous No.9353460]

>>9353364
There is nothing inherently sexual about lolita...but I'm still gonna need a source for that image.

[Anonymous No.9353461]

>>9353456
>uses a radfem documentary for an argument
kek

[Anonymous No.9353462]

>>9353440
Wearing Lolita is actually one of the ew things that makes me NOT insecure, so when I get stared at I'm more like "yes, I look pretty and I'm sorry you can't understand that with your narrow views "

I would actually like to believe that there are more men out there who think Lolita is beautiful (and not in the "well it looks nice I guess but I would never date that") but most probably only like it in a fetish-y way like you, if at all.

[Anonymous No.9353463]

>>9353462
FEW things, not ew. Jesus.

[Anonymous No.9353466]

>>9353461
Plus that documentary is about the argument that men are not all pedophiles, but merely attracted to teenagers. It wrongly touches on hebephilia, which is attraction to 11-14 year old children, as opposed to say high school age teenagers as in ephebophilia. It's more about the idea of 'pedohysteria' being unfounded as opposed to actually being about the assumption men are attracted to children.

[Anonymous No.9353467]

>>9353462
The guys who find that way of dressing attractive in the more beautiful sense are more likely going to be conservative men, funnily enough. Only classic though.

[Anonymous No.9353468]

>>9353462
Don't worry, anon. Not all guys who like lolita are creeps. My fiance is amazing, he loves my coords and thinks I look so lovely. Sometimes he asks if I'll dress up and go around with him just so he can show me off and watch me upset basic bitches (his words, haha). And it's not because he thinks it's sexy, either, just gorgeous and/or adorable.

Honestly wanting to fuck a girl in full lolita is akin to wanting to smash a fancy cake. why ruin something so perfect?

[Anonymous No.9353470]

Why are people replying in all seriousness? CGL really is full of airheads.

[Anonymous No.9353471]

>>9353466
And isn't that just founded in basic evolution? That girls going through puberty emit different pheromones that automatically men are more attracted to?

[Anonymous No.9353472]

>>9353470

[Anonymous No.9353474]

>>9353468
Lolitas give off a pure vibe, and guys who have certain fetishes are going to be drawn to them.

[Anonymous No.9353479]

>>9353471
That and guys want girls before they hop on the cock carousel. Nothing more disgusting than dating a girl who has had 10+ partners

[Anonymous No.9353480]

>>9353470
Personally because I was on a long bus ride and bored, but I have arrived now and must leave you all to it.

[Anonymous No.9353482]

Hot damn, post more. I'm an exhibit myself.

[Anonymous No.9353483]

>mfw /cgl/ always takes the bait

[Anonymous No.9353484]

>>9353470
I actually just realized this can be reported because of OP's picture + one other and this being a blue board. I didn't put two and two together.

[Anonymous No.9353485]

Ill bite.
There's also porn featuring obese women; does this mean that women who are obese are only obese to get fucked? No. There are also pornstars with piercings and tattoos. Or are Goth. Hell, there's even Midget porn. Just because there's porn of it doesn't mean anything. It's porn. With that logic I should quit my job because there's porn of Nurses getting fucked or cut off my legs because people get a hard on for feet. And to answer your question, no, I don't wear it to "Feel sexy" I wear it because it makes me happy. It makes me feel cute. Why would I spend hundreds of dollars on a dress for the attention of a couple of greasy men? That's stupid. I wear it for myself to please myself, nobody else. Heck, I've seen men in porn wearing suits so any man outside of a porno who wears a suit is doing it for sexual attention from women.

[Anonymous No.9353486]

>>9353484
it can't though? it's just man bewbz

[Anonymous No.9353488]

>>9353486
It's an actual depiction of sex, nothing might be showing, but it is porn, therefore not worksafe. You can't post porn on this board. 2 of the pictures, including OP's, is actual porn.

[Anonymous No.9353494]

>>9353488
They might just be sitting. No dicks. You're just triggered cuz you can't have a Chad.

[Anonymous No.9353496]

>men thinking lolita is for them

[Anonymous No.9353499]

>>9353462
Don't assume that men can separate the beautiful from the sexual, especially when the beautiful is a woman.

I will be honest in that I dated a /cgl/ lolita in 2014-15 from one of the friend finder threads, so it is very hard for me to separate the two.

I do think that it is a good thing that lolita makes you feel less insecure about your looks, and that you feel 'pretty'.

I also think that most modern lolitas have extremely fucked up views of themselves and their own sexuality as women.

>>9353459
You are one who can't bear to hear things you don't like. Not all bait threads are worthless.

>>9353458
You think that you are dressing for yourself? You think that being a lolita somehow makes you immune from female instincts?

There are many guys on /fit/ who cry and insist that they are not lifting for girls. Nobody believes them. Why lie to yourself?

[Anonymous No.9353502]

>mfw all of the "lolitas" OP posted are absolute shit

[Anonymous No.9353505]

>>9353502
Salty

[Anonymous No.9353507]

>>9353505
no, i love getting fucked in lolita as much as the next broad

but all of these whores who are open about it coordinate badly and look like garbage

[Anonymous No.9353508]

>>9353502
Well Fanny Rosie is a great lolita but yeah all the other lolita's OP posted are ita trash

[Anonymous No.9353510]

>>9353499
Nayrt but what you said is pretty idiotic desu. Basically, what you're aying is people only get dressed up or do things to change themselves for the approval of others. That's pretty ignorant, I'm pretty sure people lose weight for themselves and keep up their appearance for themselves. Sorry to disappoint you, but nobody thinks or cares about you or anyone else when they get up in the morning. Sorry you think you're so entitled

[Anonymous No.9353511]

>>9353364

[Anonymous No.9353512]

>>9353468
Good for you anon, and I do mean that.


I'm not a guy so ultimately I can't know what they think but I would assume the attraction lies in making a seemingly modest girl squirm or something like that?

[Anonymous No.9353515]

>>9353485
Yes, there is porn of nearly everything.

My point is that lolitas, and especially /cgl/ lolitas are so sexually repressed that they recoil at the slightest hint of sexuality in their fashion.

You SHOULD wear it for yourself, to please yourself, but that doesn't mean you stop being a woman while wearing it.

I do not think you can separate women's fashion from sexually. I think this is PRECISELY why you have the ageplay issue in lolita. Lolitas are not allowed to express their sexuality as adult females, so it comes out as the sexuality of regressed 'girls'.

Does this look like normal lolita fashion to you?

[Anonymous No.9353518]

>>9353515
Not even a little, looks like ita trash. You're a moron.

[Anonymous No.9353529]

>>9353507
Then where are the sexy lolitas with good coords?

So long as the prohibition against lolitas showing ANY sexuality is in place, the only racy lolita pics will be from literal sluts who only wear the fashion for attention.

It's verboten to even talk about lolita and sex in the same sentence on this board. It wasn't like this in 2012. What has happened to this place.

WHY HAS /cgl/ BANNED ALL ERO LOLITA STYLE THREADS? It is in the original lolita bible and sanctioned by mana himself, yet it is intolerable here.

I am hopeful though with the recent trend accepting lolitas that do not feel the need to wear a blouse.

[Anonymous No.9353533]

>>9353529
There's an ero thread on the board right now ya moron

[Anonymous No.9353537]

>>9353466
>hebephilia
>ephebophilia
Jesus fuck, what?

[Anonymous No.9353541]

>>9353529
That is disgusting.

[Anonymous No.9353543]

>>9353529
Wait, are you mad you don't have any good lolita porn? Is that what this is about?

[Anonymous No.9353545]

>>9353543
omg I think you figured it out

[Anonymous No.9353556]

>>9353499
> I also think that most modern lolitas have extremely fucked up views of themselves and their own sexuality as women.

Well that's not really Lolita-exclusive is it. It's clichéed but I really do think that that's society's fault, because a woman may be able to do a hundred things extremely well but if she is not also beautiful in addition to all these things she will always be seen as worthy of ridicule, no matter whether her looks actually matter to what she does.


Back on topic, Lolita just has nothing to do with sex for most of us (men may or may not be able to seperate the sexual and the beautiful, but women most certainly are) and Lolita is not inherently meant to be sexual so why would we talk about sex on a fashion board?

[Anonymous No.9353559]

>>9353374
there is porn of children too
and porn of ponies
and even fruit
none of these things are sexual by nature.

[Anonymous No.9353561]

>>9353529
Oh my god, what is this coord.


>sanctioned by Mana himself
Frankly I don't care what Mana thinks, he did not invent Lolita

And that no blouse 'trend' can diaf. Just because a few brands had a blouseless model shoot once or twice doesn't mean that's acceptable for actual wear.

[Anonymous No.9353565]

>>9353559
I second this

[Anonymous No.9353566]

I don't think there's anything wrong with age players or people who wear lolita as a kink. But like with all kinks, it's something you should keep to yourself and your partner/s and it's not something the majority of people partake in.

And the reason we dislike sexuality in lolita is because it's ita as fuck.

[Anonymous No.9353567]

>>9353529
That's the trashiest thing I've ever seen, and not a 'good coord'. All the other examples you've posted have been shit too.

>>9353515
So... women's clothing is inherently sexual? Just full stop. All fashion aimed at women is sexual. Do you know how stupid that sounds?

[Anonymous No.9353570]

>>9353456
>young girl seduces and manipulates an older man
Did you even read the book?

[Anonymous No.9353571]

>>9353374
das a fuckin replica champ
not even the japs gon risk gettin they cummies on brand
nor is someone too dumb to wear a petti let alone cover their shoulders gonna drop money for brand

[Anonymous No.9353578]

>>9353423
Seconding! It's not "proper" lolita, but I've honestly been looking for porn like this to live vicariously through since I'm not willing to risk ruining my brand.

>>9353458
Some of the things goths wear are associated with fetish gear and they don't give a fuck. While it might actually be sexual for most of them, I'm sure there's some that wear it just because they like it. I personally don't care about the weird sexual ideas some people might attach to me wearing frilly clothes (unless they acted on it. that would be a problem.) and I wish more people felt the same way. People in this fashion need some thicker skin.

[Anonymous No.9353582]

My ex and I had a deal that if the cummies got on her brand, and it ended up ruining the dress that I'd buy her a whole new one

[Anonymous No.9353584]

>>9353374
>implying average /fit/ lurker would know Milky Planet
2/10. Bored seagull, go to sleep.

[Anonymous No.9353589]

>>9353584
What does the knowledge of the average /fit/ lurker have to do with anything?

[Anonymous No.9353594]

>>9353411
>>9353374
JAV code WHEN op??? I know you have that shit you degenerate fuck

[Anonymous No.9353595]

>>9353567
So now whenever a lolita shows a hint of sexuality it is 'trashy'?

This is how it has happened: step by tiny step the lolita police here on /cgl/ has removed everything worthwhile from the fashion.

And yes, that's right. You cannot separate genuine feminine fashion from feminine sexuality. Or are you saying that lolitas are nuns?

Don't think that just because I'm a man that I'm blind. When I was with my ex I saw many great coords at her comm; more than you would think.

I also saw many timid girls afraid of cunts like you.

>>9353571
That is not a replica

[Anonymous No.9353596]

>>9353594
you aren't getting it

[Anonymous No.9353600]

>>9353595
>toptits topcoord

You have really shitty, trashy taste. plz go

[Anonymous No.9353602]

>>9353595
so. basically. you only find revealing/ero coords to be worthwhile in the fashion...? and/or discussions about sexuality? super confused here, but I think you just have shit taste.

this is why we don't care about male opinions - they suck

[Anonymous No.9353603]

>>9353594
This is not a sauce thread, sorry friend. I have collected all this for the past 5 years for the singular purpose of making this thread.

I will say that Jap lolitas seem to be less fucked in the head about their own sexuality as women, though.

The ones here seem be triggered by the suggestion that lolitas are actual women.

[Anonymous No.9353607]

>>9353603
>>9353596
>>9353594
>>9353423
>>9353411
>>9353374
Fine, shithead, just for that I found it myself.
http://jadult.net/online-19921/video-82603/full-dvd-drc-089-catcheye-vol89-on-the-spot-visiting-your-house.html

[Anonymous No.9353608]

>>9353603
You're just dense as all hell.

I love sex. Lolita fashion is not my fetish. I don't mix sex with my lolita. I feel sexiest when I'm naked or wearing cute lingerie, not when I'm wearing multiple layers of delicate, expensive, movement-restricting clothing that I prefer to keep nice so it retains resale value.

Like... I really don't know what's so hard about that to understand? I honestly don't even want my man to kiss my lips and mess up my lip gloss when I'm all dolled up.

[Anonymous No.9353611]

>>9353607
You fucking hero!

[Anonymous No.9353613]

>>9353529
1) lolita is not meant to be sexy, it's meant to be cute and modest.
2) you have shit taste, the coordinates you shared are ita trash and you should feel bad

You don't go to a restaurant and talk about fucking the free breadsticks do you? No. Why? Because it's inappropriate. So why would anyone talk about sex on a board that has to do with fashion? That's extremely inappropriate and has nothing to do with the clothes or lifestyle.

[Anonymous No.9353614]

[Anonymous No.9353616]

>>9353561

>not caring what a god thinks

yeah gonna have you to kill yourself, thanks

[Anonymous No.9353618]

>>9353607
Thank you, based anon.

[Anonymous No.9353619]

>>9353442
I do regularly pfff

Personally, I only feel sexy in Lolita when I'm at home with my boyfriend. He makes me feel super sexy in it and I fuck him in burando 5/7 days of the week. Sometimes I think men think I'm sexy when I wear it in public, and it makes me feel pretty weirded out sometimes but other times it works to my advantage.

I don't think all lolitas feel sexy when they wear it, but I'm sure some do. I'm also positive some that feel sexy don't try, and some do.

[Anonymous No.9353625]

>>9353602
Did you not see my fanny rosie
post? Or how I said that the quality of 'ero lolita' (in the very broadest sense) is poor specifically because most lolitas are terrified of getting abuse from a minority of cunts, here and elsewhere (their comm, btb, cof, the last remnants of egl/getoffegl, etc). I want to stress that it is a MINORITY that does this, and most are cajoled into going along with it.

On that note:
Does anyone remember a couple years ago, a lolita from here that was wearing a white btssb coord? She went on /soc/ and did some sexual stuff while wearing lolita.

You fucking cunts went beserk, ripped her up, doxed this poor girl, and made it so she couldn't show her face in the fashion anywhere ever again. Fuck you cunts. I was furious when that happened, and will never forgive this board for it.

I have the pics somewhere and am searching harddrives now. Gonna educate hard as soon as I find them.

[Anonymous No.9353627]

>>9353625
I remember that but she wasn't even that cute, stop being so fucking thirsty

[Anonymous No.9353629]

>hey /fit/ here
>knows about lolita
>knows print names
>pretends to not know why lolitas do what they do

Please try harder next time, this is embarrassing.

[Anonymous No.9353630]

>>9353625
Please share. I'm considering doing this myself, but not on 4chan most likely for that exact reason, hah.

[Anonymous No.9353633]

>>9353629
Did he not say he's been in /cgl/ since 2012?

[Anonymous No.9353634]

>>9353595
Kek, I'm not saying a hint of sexuality is trashy, I'm saying literally walking around in fucking underwear is trashy. Wearing that lingerie top without anything over it in normie fashion would be trashy too. I can appreciate a good ero coord like the rest of us, but that isn't it.

I'm genuinely curious though. All feminine fashion is sexual? What about stuff like pic related? Or maxi dresses? Ladies' business suits? How far does this go? Or is the only genuine feminine fashion the stuff you can jerk off to?

>>9353608
This. I'm a very sexual person, I just don't mix it with lolita, or any of my other hobbies for that matter. Sex is for alone time, preferably naked, with my partner.

[Anonymous No.9353645]

>>9353595

Jesus you really are dense. By your standards wearing any clothing at all means that I wanna have sex and that any guy should just prance right up to me? Yea no. Imma take my frilly ass and kick that asshole in the crotch so hard that his unborn offspring cringe

[Anonymous No.9353646]

>>9353645
im not his unborn offspring but i cringed

[Anonymous No.9353649]

>>9353633
>he
>that long without knowing

Yeah, nah

[Anonymous No.9353652]

>>9353634
>I'm genuinely curious though. All feminine fashion is sexual?
I feel the need to bring up that cause guys were creeping on women who wear skirts, women started wearing bike shorts under skirts. Then men started fetishizing wearing bike shorts under skirts. There's no winning. Guys thirst too much.

[Anonymous No.9353655]

>>9353625
How about you stop forcing your views on lolitas when your opinion is invalid? You can't change the fact that we don't feel sexy and we love that we can for once enjoy feminine things without a sexual connotation.

Oh, I forgot, men need to make anything about them. There can't be a women having a hobby that's not about men.

And stop with that repressed sexuality thing. Most lolitas are in long healthy relationships.

[Anonymous No.9353657]

>>9353655
>Oh, I forgot, men need to make anything about them. There can't be a women having a hobby that's not about men.

cmon now. That has to be the most ridiculous thing I've read in weeks

[Anonymous No.9353659]

>>9353649
Not knowing what? About how lolitas view themselves? Sounds like he's had his mind made up for a while.

[Anonymous No.9353662]

>>9353655
>opinion is invalid
fff what?
>lolitas, we, we, men, them, women
generalizations, youre no better than him lol
>most lolitas are in long healthy relationships
woah, where's these statistics coming from? your personal experience? because everything is about you? or maybe you just made that up to try to make a point and hoped nobody would notice youre talking out of your ass?

pathetic.

[Anonymous No.9353664]

>>9353657
But that's the point. OP is offended because lolitas dress for themselves for their own enjoyment. He desperately tries to sexualize it so it can be about men again. I think he can't wrap his head around the idea that wearing lolita is a hobby like many others, like collecting retro toys or painting pretty flowers.

[Anonymous No.9353667]

>>9353662
Cause it is true and you know it.
Also, there is almost no lolita I have met online or irl that didn't have a boyfriend or girlfriend.

[Anonymous No.9353668]

>>9353662
His opinion is invalid, anon. When did we start caring about opinions of outsiders.

[Anonymous No.9353671]

My only non lolita-specific post:
>>9353634
I'm not sure you can appreciate a good ero coord. Ero is regularly attacked here. The slightest sexuality in the fashion gets attacked. This prudish slippery slope has killed the ero style.

And yes, nearly all feminine fashion is sexual. Anything that accentuates the female form. Anything that is soft and has flowing curves. The pic you posted in marginally sexual. Though your sweater obscures your figure, still the delicateness of your hands, the tentative way they are held, the softness of the sweater, the long hair at the neck, the skirt that hides something.

This is the Venus de Medici. Even in her nudity, aphrodite still hides her sex behind her hands, modest, maybe teasing, and maybe bashful, even for the godess.

Maybe lolita hides things as well. It certainly accentuates the female form.

[Anonymous No.9353673]

>>9353625
So you want to post on /cgl/ a picture of a girl who got doxxed and harassed due to 'cunts' on /cgl/. For a knight, your armor is brilliant.

[Anonymous No.9353675]

>>9353667
this. almost all lolitas are in relationships, most of them long-term.

[Anonymous No.9353678]

>>9353671
bro, you're such a fedora

[Anonymous No.9353679]

This thread is now such a train wreck I can't look away...

[Anonymous No.9353685]

Can we all just agree that he's dense and wants to make this fashion about men? I mean god forbid a woman does anything for herself amirite? I mean if he can manage to sexualize female hands... as far as I'm concerned, this person is just reaching for something that isn't there desu

[Anonymous No.9353686]

>>9353671
This is so creepy.

[Anonymous No.9353689]

OP faps to sissies and has shit taste, pass it on.

[Anonymous No.9353690]

>>9353685
And adding to that, gulls know that it has nothing to do with sex. It has nothing to do with men. People who wear it know what it is and isn't about, at this point we can't change his mind, he doesn't like the fact that women do things for themselves. That's why he has to reach so far up his ass.

[Anonymous No.9353693]

It's futile to try separate looking nice and being an object of desire. This goes for any fashion, men's or women's.

[Anonymous No.9353694]

>>9353693
and how about we don't care about being anyone's object of desire. men can like me all they want when I'm dolled up, idgaf, I'm just pretty for myself.

[Anonymous No.9353695]

>>9353603
> I will say that Jap lolitas seem to be less fucked in the head about their own sexuality as women, though.

You do realize that 99% of Lolitas in porn are porn actresses wearing the dresses basically as costumes, don't you? Please tell me you don't actually believe that the majority of these girls are actual Lolitas.

[Anonymous No.9353696]

>>9353616
lol, maybe when you learn how to English.

[Anonymous No.9353698]

>>9353695
If you wear lolita, you are a lolita.

[Anonymous No.9353699]

Is literally every cunt here clueless about WHY lolita has the problems that it does?

Clearly none of you have any damn idea why ageplayers are attracted
to your fashion. Why even some of the posters IN THIS THREAD ARE AGEPLAYERS, but hide it.

So long as lolita is a fashion of sexual repression, it will both attract the sexually repressed, and said sexuality will express itself in unorthodox ways, like pic related.

Do you all just block out what they're doing on tumblr? How do you deal with the ageplayers that start following your Instagram? Do you know comm FB pics get scraped and reuploaded with caps about naughty lolitas needing cummies from their daddies?

But lets ignore it, and report any thread that talks about.

>>9353655
My opinions are invalid?

I fucked a /cgl/ lolita for over a year. Know most everyone in her comm. I was here for Fitness Fridays. This thread is 5 (FIVE) years in the making. My opinion is valid.

>>9353652
This anon speaks the truth.
There is no escaping the sexual dynamic that exists between men and women.
Also, I believe this is called a 'salopette'. Note the leggings, petticoat, and headwear.

[Anonymous No.9353701]

>>9353698
If you wear Lolita one time because you get paid, I really don't think you count as Lolita. I also don't consider people like Nakamura Risa Lolita because she has no interest in the fashion outside of being AP's go-to model nowadays.

[Anonymous No.9353702]

>>9353698
And how would you, sir, define "wearing lolita"?
Because 99.9% of "lolitas" in porn are not "wearing lolita" according to the fashion.
Throwing on a dress does not a coord make. If you've been here since 2012, you'd think you'd know this.

>>9353699
> I put my dick in it, so I know all about it!
I don't claim to be an Overwatch pro just because I fuck my boyfriend and know all his friends. C'mon now.

[Anonymous No.9353707]

>>9353614
Oh boy I'm super smart and super retarded at the same time apparently

[Anonymous No.9353708]

There's already a cringe thread, we don't need two. >>9337090

[Anonymous No.9353710]

>>9353707
>unable to read the second sentence
Just super retarded, I'm afraid.

[Anonymous No.9353713]

>>9353671
You must be really great at typing with one hand, anon, because there's no way you weren't jerking off while you were coming up with that creepy-ass shit

[Anonymous No.9353714]

>>9353699
>There is no escaping the sexual dynamic that exists between men and women.
no dude im saying men are sad, lowly beings who will turn everything sexual due to their depravity

[Anonymous No.9353715]

>>9353695
And was she a porn actress?

Or was she a regular seagull who decided to post on /soc/ and got wrecked by vengeful cunts here that claim "99% of Lolitas in porn are porn actresses wearing the dresses basically as costumes"?

[Anonymous No.9353718]

>>9353715
She's a dumbass who posted her face on one board and cooch on another, not realizing people are capable of connecting the dots. The only reason she did it, too, was because nobody replied to her post on /cgl/ and so she didn't get the attention she craved.
If she was a 'regular seagull,' she would've seen it coming from a mile away.
Porn actresses, camgirls, escorts, and prostitutes get outed all the time. Even posting just your face on certain parts of the internet can lead to trouble. (Look at all the people who went to HWNDU - both sides of the debate, and almost every single one of them was doxed.)
Learn to be internet savvy or face the consequences.

[Anonymous No.9353720]

>>9353715
based on that makeup, yes.

[Anonymous No.9353721]

>>9353720
Don't forget the $0.99 stockings and office worker blouse!

[Anonymous No.9353724]

i think this is an interesting thread, and i appreciate OP's effort to try and provoke!
so maybe some lolitas do enjoy having sex while wearing lolita. maybe some dont. and some lolitas enjoy the attention they get from wearing lolita, sexual or not. maybe it differs from day to day or depending on your mood. what i want to say is, who cares? yes some people will always think what i wear is a fetish or for men. that is sad but i cant change it. because even if i wear sweatpants and snearkers, maybe a sneaker fetish guy will walk by and find that sexy. it's sad, but at least i have felt happier since i started practicing not caring about how men percieve me. after a life of always defining myself from if men found me attractive or not, i feel much more free and happier. this is something lolita helps me feel as well, it helps with the almost impossible task to stop caring what guys think. so for me lolita is almost as an armour, a weapon, to be more myself and less catering to the male gaze.

(also who wants to have sex in multiple layers of petticoats, annoying zippers, waist ties, heavy twin tail wigs, tight blouses, dangling jewellery, star clips, etc? and the makeup??? WHY??)

[Anonymous No.9353727]

Does OP realize that lolita started as part of the hyper-femininity movement in Japan that was essentially a pushback against women having to cater themselves to men? And how part of the point of the fashion was to look less attractive to men?