Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 388 KB, 853x1280, 9babbbcf0fda386b1a3113cec9556b02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9699911 No.9699911 [DELETED]  [Reply] [Original] [rbt]

Previous thread >>9696261

>> No.9699923
File: 125 KB, 599x908, 8b6ae16f6ffca927462ae3a33504d8af.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9699923

>> No.9699948
File: 306 KB, 774x1032, julia___morning_light_jaquard_5_by_tgrrr89-da74su2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9699948

Type 'brolita' into deviantart if you want a shit show

>> No.9699953
File: 63 KB, 220x218, 46237890577.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9699953

>>9699911
>>9699923

>> No.9699957

>>9699948
Can someone please fix his wig?

>> No.9699958
File: 144 KB, 346x579, gothic_brolita_crossplay_by_brsdjbd-dawblb0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9699958

>>9699948
I won't sleep for weeks

>> No.9699961
File: 270 KB, 639x679, cease.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9699961

>>9699958
Please stop, I want to get some sleep tonight.

>> No.9699964
File: 47 KB, 960x576, after_bondage_bliss_close_up_by_sweetlolitakairi-dars099.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9699964

>>9699961
I'm just getting started Anon

>> No.9699969
File: 252 KB, 1032x774, julia___winter_rose_garden_2_by_tgrrr89-daknvm7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9699969

>>9699957
Looks like that's just how he wears them.

>> No.9699971

Oh boy, if you gals want I found some "sissy stories" where basically,those guys wrote their weird stories about getting transformed into a girly girl or humiliated on pictures of actual lolitas.

>> No.9699976

>>9699971
I'm gagging already

>> No.9699977
File: 5 KB, 174x167, 1468700924117.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9699977

>>9699971
I'm curious....but also terrified

>> No.9699981
File: 422 KB, 220x165, 1478646832295.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9699981

>>9699971
Don't leave us hanging

>> No.9699987
File: 155 KB, 380x500, petticoated_by_lovyne-d9zcv0a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9699987

>> No.9699988

>>9699964
>mfw i recognize this dress
>it's the same model i bought like 6 years ago when i was a sad ita
fucking hell

>> No.9699992
File: 934 KB, 370x208, jontron-stop.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9699992

>>9699987
The police should be knocking on this door any minute

>> No.9700001
File: 284 KB, 786x900, 748cfcfb5bf7855de3295f832b59812c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700001

I hope you're ready to cringe.

>> No.9700004
File: 1.26 MB, 1126x750, cupcake__an_aiko_story__by_zoliborz-d8e4vie.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700004

>>9700001

>> No.9700005
File: 257 KB, 320x583, 1457686308972.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700005

>>9700001
>bluses

>> No.9700006
File: 171 KB, 918x870, lolita_fashion_shoot_by_another_me_47-davqgu9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700006

>>9700004

>> No.9700007
File: 152 KB, 900x675, plushie2_by_puffin_platthy-d38jq5f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700007

>>9700006
I haven't actually read any of these, I just found a cd/sissy goldmine.

>> No.9700009
File: 203 KB, 1024x674, tg_caption___go_on_and_laugh_by_ugu_deviant_2-d90uvj4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700009

>>9700007

>> No.9700012
File: 1.15 MB, 1000x750, the_sub_part_1__an_aiko_story__by_zoliborz-d90c4vc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700012

>>9700009

>> No.9700014
File: 591 KB, 908x727, 1452257693902.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700014

>>9700009
It's extra creepy that most of these stories seem to involve being humiliated by a sister...

>> No.9700017

>>9700001
>>9700009
i'm quietly dreading the day that my picture is used for one of these. it feels inevitable as a sweet lolita who posts online.

>> No.9700018
File: 511 KB, 943x740, 147__acting_natural_by_diaperedsteph-db1tn7q.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700018

>>9700012

>> No.9700019

>>9700017
Yea I always feel bad for the lolitas that get their picture used for these weird fetish stories

>> No.9700021
File: 269 KB, 1234x1164, Screenshot 2017-11-20 13.36.06.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700021

>>9700018
I hate this guy with a passion.

>> No.9700022
File: 82 KB, 680x680, barf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700022

>>9700018

>> No.9700026

>>9700018
that's disgusting wtf

>> No.9700027

are those actually considered arousing by some individuals?

>> No.9700029
File: 254 KB, 720x960, lolita_parasol_by_sweetlolitakairi-d7fv2sm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700029

>>9700021

>> No.9700031
File: 54 KB, 612x612, 1495741086193.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700031

>>9700018
This one wins because you know at least ONE person has actually done this.

>> No.9700032

>>9699976
>>9699977
>>9699981
Aight gals. Gotta just do one thing and i'll be posting some of my finds.

>> No.9700035
File: 193 KB, 771x1700, waii_lolita_maid_2_by_jakewaii-d98iarm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700035

>>9700029

>> No.9700036

>>9700021
>diaper = fashion style?
I hate these weirdos who do disgusting things and then try to make it seem normal

>> No.9700040
File: 170 KB, 1024x1613, sissy_lolita_dress_by_brielivingston-dbfjl2b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700040

>>9700035

>> No.9700042

>>9700006

Oh Jesus I know her. Do I tell her?

>> No.9700044
File: 144 KB, 900x675, a89bbb2b9c4fb8d293c6f60365823bf5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700044

>>9700040
And one more from me.

>> No.9700045

>>9700042
She might be able to get the original post taken down for using her image without her permission...but it's probably too late to erase it from the internet completely

>> No.9700047
File: 472 KB, 690x672, 1468982112002.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700047

>>9700040
>when you recognize someone from /pol/ in this thread
That guy is the UK's poster child(?) for Transgender Rights.

>> No.9700048
File: 86 KB, 1024x368, misakodoesntdeservethis.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700048

>>9700032
Here we go.

>> No.9700050

>>9700032
...You mean you weren't the anon who posted all the stories in the thread just now? I've had enough to last a lifetime, thanks.

>> No.9700053
File: 13 KB, 480x360, 1468686645454.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700053

>>9700044
man if I saw that thing creeping around my backyard, I would get out the compound bow

>> No.9700054

Do we really need these threads just to dump images? Don't some of these guys have humiliation fetish/get off to this?

>> No.9700055
File: 238 KB, 891x750, uwu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700055

>>9700048

>> No.9700057
File: 457 KB, 500x281, 1445195986280.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700057

>>9700050
This ride never ends
>>9700054
If you've got a story or took a picture for yourself go for it.

>> No.9700061
File: 262 KB, 918x685, thatsitimgettinmemallet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700061

>>9700055

>> No.9700064

>>9700054
They absolutely get off to it, and you guys are certainly the object of some self-congratulatory wanking right now, be sure of it.

>> No.9700066
File: 258 KB, 993x804, thiswasntwhatiwaspromised.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700066

>>9700061

>> No.9700069

>>9700050
(nayrt) Nah, I jumped in on it too because I hate sissies and love a good cringe thread.

>> No.9700070
File: 483 KB, 998x710, fitizenfate.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700070

>>9700066

>> No.9700073

>>9700064
One man's cringe is another man's wank??? If you're really so worked up by humiliation fetishists in this thread right now, then try not to think of how many of them frequent the other threads.

>> No.9700080
File: 375 KB, 847x710, 197__loli_realization__2_by_diaperedsteph-db934hd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700080

>>9700069
same here desu. I hate sissies (and anyone into sexual ageplay/ddlg) with a passion. They're absolutely disgusting.

>> No.9700082
File: 328 KB, 969x720, mighttrythistbh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700082

>>9700080

>> No.9700084

>>9700082
Most embarrassing fashion show etiquette desu

>> No.9700085

call me an SJW but i don't think it's fair to the girls in the pic to be reposting these. it must be really embarrassing, and we're just associating their faces with these captions now.

especially because >>9700080 was 100% underage at the time this was taken. i recognize her from a French documentary and she was in her younger teens.

>> No.9700089

>>9700070
>Surgery to have his muscles removed

My brain hurts from how stupid this is

>> No.9700091
File: 163 KB, 600x399, you're going to die tomorrow lord bolton sleep well.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700091

>>9700021
>using unwilling girls' photos for your fetish bullshit
>I have A LOT of respect for loli fashions
>diapers are fashion
>not my intention to offend anyone uwu

>> No.9700095

>>9700082
>Really sorry I turned you into a girl, dad.
I'm laughing who the hell writes this lmao

>> No.9700097

>>9700082
>dad
Why? Who makes those? They are so weird and specifc.
Posting it here probably isn't the best thing to do, but if you recognise someone you can contact them and maybe do something about it. I feel bad for anyone whose photo was used for this creepy shit.

>> No.9700098

>>9700085
Ehh I actually kinda agree with you,i don't have anything else "special" to dump anyway it was mostly those japanese models images (aka Misako).
I hate those guys so damn much honestly.
The one who did these or at least a load of these do the same with cosplays and other japanese alt fashions.

>>9700089
They have some about magic rings swapping the bodies,drinks turning them into 6yo girls,...
They need to be gassed quite frankly

>> No.9700100

>>9700098
if you guys want anymore btw (including pictures of the author in lolita and kosupure)
https://cotton-candyannie.deviantart.com/gallery/

>> No.9700101

>>9700085
I agree, it isn't fair to the girls, and it wasn't fair to them when the images were stolen and written on and posted to a fetishists account to be shared amongst other fetishists. These shouldn't exist in the first place, but there's just about nothing to be done now unless you want to track down the caption maker and stop them. All we can do is laugh at how stupid they are here now.

>> No.9700121

Kay real talk though. If I made really shitty clothes out of cheap lace and "girly fabric" could I make great money off sissies?

>> No.9700126

>>9700121
You bet your ass you could. Go buy some shitty fabric, follow a few Yumi King tutorials and rake in that sissy cash.

>> No.9700132

>>9700098
What bugs me more is that these guys are probably lazy slob fucks who don't even realize that muscle just shrinks if you don't keep up your routine. Whcih could have been an even more embarassing premise.

I'm weird I don't care about magic rings but misinformed science pisses me off.

>> No.9700178

>>9700085
I agree. I think it's important for people to realize that even if they haven't had to deal with a creep IRL, their pictures have potentially been stolen and used by one.

>> No.9700187
File: 8 KB, 196x258, disappointed_face.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700187

Did anyone else get temporarily banned from Part 1? I did and I'm just checking if that's just me or other people too.

>> No.9700192

Notice how whiteknights from last thread suddenly disappeared? It's like they were arguing for the sake of "women so sexist, you hipocrites", but now that there're photos, nobody dares to say anything.

>> No.9700197

>>9700073
Are you sure it's a man's cringe? It seems more like a woman's fap.

>> No.9700201

>>9700101
Ever read the Ita thread? It's not fair to laugh at them either, especially when their posts are taken from COF.

>> No.9700205

>>9699971
Pinterest is full of them and it makes me sick

>> No.9700208

>>9700201
There's a pretty big difference imo. The ita thread is plain mean, I agree, but this enters sexual/fetish territory which is an entirely separate can of worms that makes it that much more unacceptable. Especially when children are involved.

>> No.9700222

>>9700061
what even is this fetish? how could anyone get off to reading this shit?
and yeah fucking bullshit any of these guys respect 'loli' fashion, absolutely disgusting

>> No.9700231

I can't believe a huge portion of /cgl/ are into sissies, really unexpected

>> No.9700237

>>9700018
There's something poetic about Misako getting a particularly vile caption. Like the more famous you are, the worse it'll be.

>> No.9700248
File: 194 KB, 466x312, hWiMhNW.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700248

>>9700237
Here's another one w/BTB secret commentary.

>> No.9700262

>>9700248
>pantied

EW NO

>> No.9700277

>>9700021
I don't think I've ever been as pissed off as I am right now. At all of these photos. Like I'm legitimately seething over this shit.

>> No.9700281

>>9700187
What did you say that you think got you banned?

>> No.9700291

>>9700029
I have this dress....time to throw it out

>> No.9700304

>>9699911
tfw one of the most infamous sissy creeps live in your city and knows all about Lolita's and "brolitas"
I fear one day I will run into them .

>> No.9700334

>>9700304
who?

>> No.9700378
File: 584 KB, 578x547, 1468419706590.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700378

>>9700334
https://mobile.twitter.com/stefonknee/status/683378437671796736?lang=en

>> No.9700380

>>9700304
If you're talking about Stefonknee I've actually seen him in person before. There's something horrifically majestic about seeing a middle-aged man lumber down the street in a too-short tutu

>> No.9700386
File: 332 KB, 1619x758, boris.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700386

>>9700070
i saved it

>> No.9700391

>>9700386
Is this real??

>> No.9700415
File: 349 KB, 1451x2048, IMG_5920.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700415

Question: Is a man in a Victorian-era man's outfit a brolita, or is that term reserved solely for crossplayers?

>> No.9700420

>>9700415
No, brolita was always used to reference males in female attire. Either way avoid the phrase for a multitude of reasons.

>> No.9700425

>>9700415
Brolita is just a term used for guys who dress in lolita clothing, so dresses and skirts.
A guy wearing any kind of male lolita counterpart fashion (ouji, aristo, historial inspired) wouldn't be considered a brolita.

>> No.9700435

>>9700080
>cloth
Just goes to show how much they actually care about fashion. It's all about their disgusting dicks.

>>9700097
These creepy fetishists are fucked up in more ways than one. It's not just sissy stuff and diapers, it more often than not involves incest. I'm all for stricter gun laws, but these freaks should probably be shot on sight.

>>9700121
Yes. If you sell them in huge elephant sizes on etsy, you can make a killing. If you can't shoot them, might just as well make money of them and help make them look ridiculous.

>>9700187
No, but I didn't whitenight these freaks. Had the impression that the white knights were raiders from the robot board.

>>9700205
Report them. Pinterest is pretty strict about banning pervs.

>>9700201
The ita thread is about their actual style, the way they actually look, not some freak projecting their incestual potty play fetish.

>> No.9700440
File: 79 KB, 1280x960, 1502977249866.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700440

so how many of these are third parties that take pictures from unrelated lolitas and brolitas and add deviant art-tier captions, while hiding behind the possibility that people will think it is the person in the photo who is behind it?

>> No.9700446

>>9700440
I'm pretty sure no one thinks that these are fooling anyone, even the freaks making them.
It's obvious that they don't care if they steal and use photos.

>> No.9700456

>>9699987
Did someone photoshop the kid from Stranger Things on the head of this model?

>> No.9700489

>>9700420
>female attire
>implying pieces of cloth are gender specific
lul

>> No.9700502
File: 1.26 MB, 1440x2880, Screenshot_2017-11-20-19-10-10.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700502

>start doing market research on selling overpriced sissy clothes
>see this shot

Oh god is it worth it? Maybe if I can embrace the irony and laugh at them while forcing a persona.

>> No.9700512

>>9700021
>loli fashions
>loli

>> No.9700519

>>9700121
Absolutely. Throw in plastic bloomers and you'd make a fortune.

>> No.9700529
File: 12 KB, 214x48, it never ends.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700529

Almost half of my activity is bots or kinksters anymore... I need to delete my tumblr already.

>> No.9700562

>>9700529
I'd block them

>> No.9700565

Would you sell a dress to a sissy?

>> No.9700572

>>9700562
I do, but they're like the hydra. For every one I block, three more seem to spring up in its place.

>> No.9700573

>>9700565
at a $200 price hike

>> No.9700575

>>9700529
same. every time i post a cutesy coordinate, i get plagued with likes/reblogs from "littles" and it makes me wanna scream. now i go through every individual note and block them, but it's arduous and useless in the end.

>> No.9700583

>>9700197
>implying women get off to this

>> No.9700587

>>9700489
Gender is a social construct so yes, clothes can be gender specific. What do you think it mean when people say that lolita is hyper-feminine?

>>9700565
No.

>> No.9700588

>>9700575
Why are you still om Tumblr? I thought everyone moved to Instagram.

>> No.9700599

>>9700588
I use tumblr more like a mood board where I post my outfits, hauls, and art, and I use instagram for everyday life stuff (nature, food, animals,).
I'm not worried about getting a lot of followers or anything like that, so it doesn't really matter.

>>9700565
Not if I knew it.

>> No.9700612

>>9700588
i don't like insta as a platform, and for some reason my content draws in a lot of traffic on tumblr. i'm better at making infrequent ~aesthetic~ posts than i am at making frequent daily life ones.

>> No.9700616

does anyone know that one prominent AP ageplayer on instagram

>> No.9700620
File: 172 KB, 750x1062, IMG_5233.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700620

Anyone got sauce on this sissy being creepier than average?

>> No.9700625

>>9700620
>pretending to be super gay to sleep with other women
So... is he pretending to be a lesbian? I don't understand

>> No.9700626

>>9700620
>It was at that moment I realized "Hey wait a minute you aren't gay"
Like wtf lmao

>> No.9700627

Would you wear your lolita outfit on a date?

>> No.9700639

>>9700627
Well if lolita is an important part of your life then you probably should let a potential life partner in on it early on.

>> No.9700643

>>9700627
What >>9700639 said. I wear lolita daily so it'd be dumb to not wear it on a date too. It's a good filter for shallow guys and sexual creepers.

>> No.9700644

>>9700627
Why not? Like >>9700639 said, if its important to you, then let your partner in on it beforehand.
I've worn Lolita on dates before and my s/o is pretty chill about it.

>> No.9700666
File: 212 KB, 750x1334, IMG_4017.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700666

Every time I see one of her posts on my feed I feel a very intense urge to take a bleach bath

>> No.9700672

>>9700565
This. Tell them its piss resistant and watch them try to file a claim when they find out you're lying amd the damage is done.

>> No.9700673

>>9700666
why does she look so awful in everything she wears

>> No.9700675

>>9700666
It's ok princess there's no need to be upset.

>> No.9700678

>>9700502
>little long
>dress goes above arms length

I'm glad that photo cuts off at the hem of the dress.

>> No.9700679

>>9700673
Combination of no make-up, caterpillar brows, man face, deliberate incorporation of kink gear, chub, and the list could go on. The only redeeming part of her coords is that she doesn't wear replicas, though I'm not sure if that's a good thing considering how she desecrates her burando. I pray that nothing in her wardrobe ever ends up on the secondhand market.

>> No.9700681

>>9700673
Getting fat from drinking too much milk and baby food.

>> No.9700727

>>9700021
this made me die inside a little

had to go through his disgusting gallery to make sure he didn't use my photos

>> No.9700734

>>9700727
well if you ever find yourself in his gallery, you can always report him for using images without permission. I think You need a deviantart account to report people though

>> No.9700737

>>9700021
I feel like I got put on a watchlist for going through his gallery, jesus. Not only a creep to lolitas, but to little kids too. Gonna report his stuff later.

>> No.9700739

>>9700734
I do have a deviantart account and I'll keep an eye out for them (I hope he never uses them, though).

Unfortunately DA will do nothing if I report the other photos since they aren't mine.

>> No.9700743

>>9700277
This is what "inclusivity" and "welcoming" gets you. Entitlement to get their dicks hard while they pretend it's *not really*.

When you have a "that guy" or "that girl" sometimes you have to kick them out and hope they learn how to behave one day.

>> No.9700745

>>9700737
>>9700739
You can definitely report anything that seems like he's sexualizing children

>> No.9700757

>>9700745
i'll report him anyway, i hope DA does something

>> No.9700765

>>9700745
nyart but I just tried and DA wants proof that the person is underage. I just hope they look at the picture and go YEP. I'd like to try and report everything and make fake accounts to harass, but I honestly don't think anything will happen because of how shitty DA is. Fuck him.

>> No.9700767
File: 1.88 MB, 480x264, 1506523542066.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700767

>>9700666
yeah. I know her, I think she's in my comm. Showed the mods her insta and they didnt do shit about it. Some of the things on her IG are SO INAPPROPRIATE HOLY SHIT It's really quite foul.

>> No.9700768

>>9700765
Yea I think it's half the staff not giving a shit and half of the fact that DA is just too huge to purge all the garbage out of it

>> No.9700771

>>9700767

I don't see her in the Melbourne comm's member list.

>> No.9700775

>>9700771
Wait wasn’t that guy who said he was soooo shy uwuwu also from the Melbourne area? They should hook up and leave the rest of you alone.

>> No.9700806

>>9700768
I'm shooting for the "Sissies = Pedophile" angle and hoping it raises a red flag.

Because seriously.

Sissies are fucking pedophiles.

>> No.9700811
File: 58 KB, 640x702, 23498972_161904544302577_9109858400568606720_n[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9700811

>>9700775

Can't be a daddy if you're a sissy girl.

>> No.9700823

>>9700811
She looks so proud of being a freak. Wonder what his parents have to say about it.

>> No.9700824

>>9700248
This stuff makes me so bummed. While I think it’s nice that dudes accept femininity and think femininity is hot, majority of this and drag see women as a costume they can pull off or be forced into and i don’t know man, I don’t like seeing my upbringing/womanhood as a joke, nor seeing Lolita be boiled down to an excuse to wear diapers/ageplay in public.

>> No.9700825

>>9700824
>I don’t like seeing my upbringing/womanhood as a joke
This is the reason I hate drag queens.

>> No.9700827

>>9700825
Drag queens are fine, they stick to their own communities and don't make a hobby out of harassing actual girls and women. They're also so over the top, they don't try to get mistaken for real women. Drag queens aren't afraid of other men either, while sissy fetishists avoid other men since they know they'll get beaten up and choose to infiltrate our communities since they see us as easy prey.

tl;dr: drag queens are legitimate performers, sissies are disgusting masturbators.

>> No.9700828

>>9700771
She's from Melbourne? Fuck, i'm moving states

>> No.9700832

>>9700765
reporting stuff to DA does dick all. All that softcore porn shit...its ridiculous. I stopped using that shithole many many years ago

>> No.9700843

>terfs reading fetish porn
well this place has gone to shit

>> No.9700874

>>9700843
>implying terfs are real
Trannies are delusional to begin with, they need help/deserve respect since they're still human beings but they have nothing to do in biological womens' spaces.

Though this thread shouldn't exist.

>> No.9700926

>>9700201
Even if you put the worst most unfair possible construction on Ita Thread, in no society on Earth has it at any time been considered the same to make fun of ugly people and to be a weird sexual deviant. Most societies consider the first one of those to be perfectly in order while the second carries a death penalty.

>> No.9700929

>>9700420
>>9700425
NAYRT but I had a question related to this from the last thread which this seems like a great time to clear up: if brolitas refer only to men in dresses why would you ever even consider accepting that in your comms at all? Men dressing in women's clothes will always be weird and fetishistic, if they were interested in the fashion why wouldn't they get male equivalents if they're not fuckups? It's not like the periods that classic draws from lack great looking, interesting menswear.

>> No.9700936

>>9700929
>if they were interested in the fashion why wouldn't they get male equivalents if they're not fuckups?

I really like lolita but i don't especially like aristo and ouji, in fact I don't even like all styles of lolita. I wouldn't become a brolita but I wouldn't spend a lot of money in clothes that I don't like either, just because they are related to lolita.

>> No.9700944

>>9700627
All depends on if there was something going on that warrants it. But for the most part no, partly because I don't want them getting some idea that I dress up 24/7 and secondly because of the above fetishists and I'd like to explain why I dress up to a potential partner first.

>> No.9700947

>>9700832
What upsets me the most is some of those people are using real children for those pictures. Like random kids photos that look taken from FB or something. That's just fucked up.

>> No.9700951

>>9700627
No for the same reason that if your hobby is model trains, you still don't bring a girl to the model train club on your first date. Unless you're a massive sperg you want to show that you have more than one odd hobby going on in your life, y'know?

>tfw wrote anime first and then realized that every anime nerd I know would totally take normie girls to watch their japanese cartoons on the first date and then not comprehend why they struck out

>> No.9700968

>>9700824
>>9700825
I’m pretty uncomfortable about drag queens too. Nobody has ever managed to explain to me how men dressing up and performing as over the top, usually unflattering stereotypes of women is any different from white people doing minstrel shows. They use a lot of misogynistic language, too. HOWEVER I also agree with >>9700827 that they stick to their own communities and aside from the occasional terribad attempt by a queen to do lolita, they don’t try to infiltrate our communities. As long as they don’t go out of their way to bother me then I’m not going to care too much what they get up to, even if I do think it’s pretty questionable.

>> No.9700992

>>9700968
All of this. In a free society we have to accept a lot of people doing a lot of shit we find unpleasant or gross, as long as the drag queens stay in their circle and let us have ours they have every right to it even if I find it gross myself (and I do).

>> No.9701018

>>9700992
Yup. You probably don’t have to swing a cat very hard before you hit someone who thinks lolitas are disgusting creepy weirdos, so I don’t consider myself to be in a position to police what others can and can’t do around other consenting adults with shared interests. What I can do is enforce my personal boundaries, and that’s where sissies come into play. If sissies just stuck to their own kink groups and left everyone else out of it I’d still think they’re gross but I wouldn’t care otherwise. The problem is that they’re trying to infiltrate places they don’t belong and demanding that everyone bend over backwards for them and their superior feelings. That’s the most important difference between sissies and other weird interest groups imo. Sissies and maybe certain BDSM enthusiasts (which I think sissies are a subgroup of) are the only group I can think of who actually enjoy forcing themselves onto people who want nothing to do with them.

>> No.9701096

>>9700929
Well, I could go full tumblr and ask, why in our society is it acceptable for women to dress themselves in men's clothing, but not vice-versa?

>> No.9701122

>>9700007
I'm salty because this brolita looks really nice, just needs a bit of foundation and lipstain.
the coord, pose, and wig is styled so well. the bag is a bit too dusty of a pink but it's still cute.

Anyway, I really want to encourage legit brolitas to git gud/stay gud and continue in the fashion. genuine and dedicated lolitas are a minority.

please let's always make a clear distinction between fetishists and guys in the fashion. wear what you like and be respectful of others. guys that genuinely like the fashion, not for sexist/erotic reasons, are my frilly brothers.
I'm coming up on my 4th yr as a lonelita in the fashion. I want to be a part of a giant, global, good-looking Frillfam and I don't care what sex y'all are. just stay true to yourselves and don't be gross, that goes for everyone.

>> No.9701126
File: 16 KB, 300x300, CxowwHyXcAY-Chs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701126

>>9700951
>>tfw wrote anime first and then realized that every anime nerd I know would totally take normie girls to watch their japanese cartoons on the first date and then not comprehend why they struck out

>> No.9701130

>>9701122
That's not a brolita, that's a lolita whose picture was stolen, shooped to have a dudes face and that gross text on it

>> No.9701131

>>9700951
>dating anyone who isn't interested in or wouldn't at least try to check out your one-true-hobby

>> No.9701132

>>9700951
Except you don't wear model trains and lolita is a fashion, not just a hobby.

>> No.9701136

>>9701132
>Except you don't wear model trains

Is that a challenge anon

>> No.9701137

>>9701122
>this brolita looks really nice
I hate using the word retarded but holy shit anon that pic couldn't be any more obviously photoshopped, please use your eyes.

>> No.9701142

At this point, I just straight up don't trust men interested in lolita. Almost every one I've met has been a total creep. Born with a penis? Get outta my comm

>> No.9701171

>>9701136
What if you wore a lolita outfit WITH trains on them?

(there's this one print with a flying train in the starry sky and i completely forgot its name but i'm pretty sure it's by Baby)

>> No.9701177

>>9701130
>>9701137
sorry I'm at work and am constantly stealing moments to be on here lol

>>9701142
this is the kind of guillotine reactionary sentiment that I worry about.
like another anon said, gender is a construct. it's made the fuck up. we aren't born waering clothes, the people around us teach us what to wear. I like frilly dresses, while my sister likes long-line late 80s early 90s french lady editor fashion. my having a vagina has very little to do with why I like lolita.
the signs of a sissy are so glaringly obvious, so don't worry about being able to tell real male lolitas from obnoxious and disrespectful fetishists. we don't need to ban all men.

>> No.9701180

>>9701177
Not all sissies are super obvious about it, though.
And fine, you can be whatever gender you like, but if you have a penis, you're going to need to prove your salt before I accept you

>> No.9701182

>>9701177
nayrt but all of that doesn't change the fact that they have more power by literally having a penis, and although not all will abuse that power, the fact that some will is enough for me to want them out, just to be safe.
Keep this fashion women oriented.

>> No.9701194

>>9701136
Put it on your head and coord it with that AatP dress.

>> No.9701206
File: 46 KB, 358x398, IMG_4605.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701206

>>9701182
>they have more power by literally having a penis
So basically...

Can't beat the cock?

[Runs away]

>> No.9701217

>>9701096
Bc women aren't usually doing it to get off to it

>> No.9701218

>>9699964
>that creepy smile?
>awfull ita dress with crap lace?
>cheap string used as shibari rope??

There are so many things wrong with this image

>> No.9701221

>>9701182
are we talking about comms? what penis-power can a cis guy exert in a comm that isn't given to him? if you're talking about potential harassment or even assault comm leaders and mods should be able to help prevent any of that.

I come from an abusive home, in which I was violently taught every man ever has authority over me. I understand fear, and how long it takes to unlearn abusive brainwashing. but not everyone comes from a deficient background like that. we're not defenseless. I would only feel threatened if I thought that there was nothing I could do about the threat.
stop thinking you're defenseless and have to sit down and take it. don't misunderstand what I'm suggesting as victim-blaming--that's absolutely not what I'm about.
I'm only talking about situations in which bad stuff hasn't happened yet. don't let it happen. don't allow for it, and don't make rules out of wild fear.
predators come in all shapes and sizes. definitely vet guys as new members in your comms, probably a little more than women. but make sure your rules block any kind of predator from succeeding.

you only have to do all this if your comm allows minors to join. with Facebook as a platform for the majority of comm hubs, random people who I'm not friends with can't directly message me so I assume it's that way for others.

don't take shit and be stronger minded. not being able to handle difficult stuff will keep you weak and dependent on others for help.
all men aren't more powerful than all women irl
average upper body strength? sure. but don't let anyone tell you that you can't protect yourself without putting yourself in a bubble.

>> No.9701225

>>9701221
i.e. segregation

>> No.9701232

>>9701217
So why is wearing women's clothing sexualized, but not wearing men's clothing? And why do women have a non-sexual reason to wear male clothing that does not exist for men wearing women's clothing?

>> No.9701247

>>9701221
Acting like we're putting ourselves in a bubble when we just want to be able to enjoy our frills in peace. Get a grip.
Also, quit trying to compare not allowing guys or heavily vetting members to racism and oppression. It's not the same at all, and your false equivalencies aren't helping your case.

>> No.9701248

>>9701232
Well if you think about it there really are no clothes that are strictly masculine anymore. Women can wear pants, ties, button-shirts etc. and unless the woman is trying to look like a boy, women wear these things in their normal outfits all the time and it's not considered weird. Whereas, a frilly dress has always been hyper-feminine and a boy wearing one still seems weird to most people. But I don't really care. Where whatever you want just don't be a creep about it.

>> No.9701254

>>9701232
Because MEN have sexualized women and women's clothing for centuries. Again, no one is saying the clothes are inherently sexual; it's the kinksters who make it that way.
People are acting like this thread is being discriminatory against brolitas, when in reality, I'm pretty sure most of us are against all kink × lolita in the public sphere, including girls. It just so happens that the proportion of guys in the fashion for the right reasons is lower than girls, and the bad apples are so bad they stick out worse.
If guys want to be taken seriously, they need to put in the effort like everyone else.
And again, I repeat, you don't have to join a comm to be a lolita. If you want to be a visible dude in a dress, you're more than welcome to do so. Don't cry like a baby when the comm takes one glance at your 9 o'clock shadow and nopes the fuck out, though.

>> No.9701257

>>9701247
sorry segregation is such a buzzword. I meant that in it's actual definition, not racial segregation or apartheid, holy shit.
we can enjoy our frills in peace if comms didn't openly let in lolitas at heart and other people who don't even have their first coord.

I support vetting members. CoF does it and so should area-specific comms. grown-ass adult women don't need to be in a woman-only space to have fun. there aren't even that many male lolitas to begin with, so I don't see the issue in having a few guys in your comm, but making sure mods give them a standard rundown. a standard intro rundown of rules and no-tolerance policies should be mentioned at the starts of every large event as a reminder as well as sent to each new member allowed in.

>> No.9701261

>>9701257
I don't need it, but I sure as hell enjoy having my community be women only. Lolita meet ups and grabbing tea with friends is pretty much the only time I get to have girl time with a group, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

>> No.9701281

>>9701131
You're way overinterpreting, I'm saying don't lead with it, not that you should never explain your crammed closet full of frills to your bf.

Showing up to the first date in a coord is autismal, mentioning it when he asks about your interest is obvious. (If he doesn't ask you about your interests, or god forbid if he's way too interested in lolita, then yeah, end it, obv.)

>> No.9701283

>>9700021
>>9700734
>>9700745

So i reported the account and it looks like all the images in the "Diapered, sissy captions, TGAR" folder were removed, including all the images in the subfolders (the submissions are still there but they're blank).

I guess that's a start

>> No.9701295

>>9701281
>Showing up to the first date in a coord is autismal
>how dare you express yourself you should only ever wear business casual clothes for dates

>> No.9701300

>>9701261
I can tolerate boys who seem like they care and aren't over 30. They are very rare though.

>> No.9701325

>>9701257
>CoF does it
no they don't. I don't have any pictures of myself on fb. there are hundreds of cosplayers and weebs on there.

>> No.9701329

>>9701248
Because feminity/females in general are seen as weak. A man wearing a dress will be shamed because he'll be seen as a sissy (no pun intended with the thread title).

>> No.9701332

>>9701232
Also women are sexualized, all they do (that's a stretch but you get what i mean),wear,..is sexualized for some reason. People sexualize even 13yo girls now.
So that's also why a dude wearing a dress will be seen as some perv whereas a woman wearing some suit+tie attire will be seen as normal or "just a tomboy" and at "worst" will be classified a lesbian

>> No.9701336

>>9701325
We now are able to ask questions on fb group so they do. They cannot do anything about past people but basic knowledge is needed to be added now. It also shows some pics of them as well but that isn’t the main thing.

I run a different group so I’m sure they do the same.

>> No.9701339

>>9701332
Exactly.
People already think lolitas are pervs who dress like children for some creepy reasons, all because a bunch of dumb fucks apparently missed the point of Nabokov. People read that book and think "oh, lolita is such a little vixen!" Instead of just accepting that Humbert is a creepy, old rapist, they blame the tweenage girl. Then, obviously, anything sharing a name with said girl is also clearly some fucking kink.
If you think about this, and don't see the problem with men/society in general, or don't understand why we don't want any more bad associations, you're a lost cause.

>> No.9701358

>>9701283
You're doing god's work, anon

>> No.9701362

>>9701339
God yes. "oooh lolita like that teenage temptress from the book?". Fucking philistines.
It grinds my gears to the point where I avoid naming what i'm wearing and just say "oh it's japanese fashion" so they usually think "oh those japanese and their wacky things!" and that's it.
Only had the "like in the book?" comment once or twice where I live though. Nobody else batted an eye when I said the name other than that. So I'm happy.

I think 3rd wave feminism is stupid but god do we need feminism. It even benefits guys in a way (i stand against the whole "don't cry you're a boy!",not complimenting in between guys because it"'s "gay",...they have emotions and need love/appreciation too) but some men don't wanna hear anything (cough,r9k,/pol/) and just see feminists either as "crazy roasites from tumblr" or as a boogeyman here to take away their rights and oppress them forever without ever thinking there might actually be a problem and it's not just "over reacting wymins amirite?".

>> No.9701363

>>9701283
Bless you anon. I hate this guy so much too and you have no idea how glad this makes me.

>> No.9701364

>>9701358
Np anon
Tbh i was hoping they would get banned

>> No.9701370

>>9701362
Nobody needs feminism if you're tying to say it will help men too. Be an egalitarian or how about don't label it at all and just speak up when things are fucked up. Labels like feminism are just used as a hive-mind call sign that punishes anyone who doesn't adhere to the group think. Feminism doesn't have a copy right on 'equal rights' or caring about people.

>> No.9701377

>>9701332
>People sexualize even 13yo girls now.
YOu're acting like this a new thing

>> No.9701405

>>9700929
Obvious bait but sissies and fetishists are NOT brolitas. They don't give a shit about lolita and shouldn't be allowed in comms because of that and potential sexual abuse.

There do exist some men with genuine interest in the fashion, coord well, and do not treat it as a sexual thing. Just like women who wear the fashion. Hence the male version of the word--'brolita'. They're rare, but they exist. Mana is a male, after all.

>> No.9701406

Will you dress your future daughter in the same lolita outfit as yours?

>> No.9701408

>>9701406
I don't plan on pooping any babies out any time soon.

>> No.9701412

>>9701406
>putting burando anywhere near a child
Disgusting.

>> No.9701422

>>9701406
>having a baby instead of Baby
Embarrassing.

>> No.9701432

>>9700004
Holy crap this is over-written.

>> No.9701441

>>9701406
I don't want any children so nope.
Besides, kids like to play around and expensive outfits aren't really a good idea (also those little things often cry which ends in snot everywhere,they drool,roll around in sand,dirt,... yikes)

>>9701422
lol

>> No.9701479

Yo, fetishist here. Not like, dress up brolita fetishist, but in the sense that observing it is my fetish. Not gonna creep on anyone or steal pics, but just throwing that out there.

>> No.9701483
File: 8 KB, 207x200, _993d4f92cffcf36a4b946c7fe4164544.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701483

>>9701479

>> No.9701485
File: 18 KB, 250x333, 1448237602489.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701485

>>9701479

>> No.9701494

>>9701483
>>9701485
Yeah, sucks but watching CCS very young really let the petticoat kink develop in a big way. What's a guy supposed to do about that but lurk /cgl/, you know?

>> No.9701498

>>9701479
M...mods

>> No.9701507

>>9701494
I think you missed the point of this thread, i.e. we want you to gtfo.

>> No.9701508

>>9700806
Not true

>> No.9701512

>>9701508
all the sissy transformation fan fiction involves either little girls, incest, or diaper fetish. It's all bad.

>> No.9701513

>>9700926
The Ita thread, BTB, and lolcow are all about making fun of ugly people.

>> No.9701514

>>9701479
Yo we don't give a fuck. Get the fuck out you nasty bitch.

>> No.9701516
File: 276 KB, 1524x220, pedotears.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701516

My work is complete.

>> No.9701518

>>9701516
A hero of our nation

>> No.9701520

>>9701122
I think the same way. I love the fashion and sex is not a part of it.

>> No.9701521
File: 839 KB, 500x281, 1503841927111.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701521

>>9701516
For once the system works. Good job to everyone who filed a report!

>> No.9701522

>>9701516
Fucking degenerate. Well done anon, I hope his account is closed down for good.

>> No.9701524

>>9701516
I love how he thinks giving credit is the same thing as getting permission.

>> No.9701525

>>9701507
I gathered, but you might as well be asking a fish not to swim

>> No.9701527

>>9701516
I was just about to post this. I love you, anon. Fuck him.

>> No.9701528

>>9701524
Yea that only works for stock and public domain images

>> No.9701529

>>9701182
What makes you think that men who dress as girls are there to overpower you? They just behave like idiots. You have power over them. Enjoy it.

>> No.9701530

>>9701518
>>9701520
>>9701522

Tbh I didn't think DA was going to do anything at all, but I'm sure other gulls reported him as well and that probably made their decision quickly, as they handled the matter in a few hours after I submitted the report.

GG everyone!

>> No.9701533

>>9701516
The comments on that post of people defending him are so gross. I want to report them as well.

>> No.9701538

>>9701516
Lol DA is the website for sick fetishists why would they remove it?

>> No.9701540

Does anyone understand why they want to use that particular format so much? Like if they want to write their gross stories, why do they need to steal pics as well to add to it?

>> No.9701541

>>9701508
Except it is. Like>>9701512 said, most of this involves pedophilia (like people being transformed into little girls who then have things done to them), incest, or very sexual ageplay bullshit.

>>9701516
Bless your soul. I wish you all the brand you dream of.

>>9701529
Are you fucking dumb? It's not about men having power over us in the comm.

>> No.9701546

>>9701541
Yeahh the particular guy who just got reported and had his stuff taken down had photo caption/stories with pictures of little girls in swimsuits. Or maybe it was in his favorites. Idk, I tried not to linger too long. But that kind of shit exists, so that's fucked up.

>> No.9701547

>>9701540
It's because they are creatively bankrupt. They can't draw and they probably aren't cute enough to full fill the fantasy themselves so they have to steal images to satisfy the fantasy.

>> No.9701551
File: 923 KB, 744x970, 6947a29d33ff3b408274fac8ad261f14.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701551

>>9701540
captions are so bad even /d/ banned them

>> No.9701566

This thread, all replies, are exactly what the fetishist/sissies get off on.
Great job with perpetuating cancer ladies you bib it

>> No.9701568
File: 64 KB, 831x216, Screen Shot 2017-11-21 at 5.11.54 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701568

Oh boohoo, poor guy is scared of the big meanie lolitas.

>> No.9701574

>>9701568
Lel I'll report him again if he puts them back up

>> No.9701579
File: 8 KB, 226x223, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701579

>>9701566
They don't get off to us getting their shitty fetish captions taken down

>> No.9701580

Good job gulls! We should try and take down as many as possible. As >>9701533 said, the commenters are just as gross and one of them also has captions with lolita pictures.

>> No.9701586

>>9701136
>every OTT lolita ever: "I think I could use that as a headpiece"

>> No.9701591
File: 1004 KB, 480x270, drool.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701591

can you girls post some more? I really enjoy these types of comments.

>> No.9701603
File: 16 KB, 600x600, e9d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701603

>>9701591

>> No.9701611

>>9701568
Christ that icon is horrifying. How can this delusional creep not understand how lolitas (or anyone) don't want his shame fetish captions attached to pictures of us? Even without the disgusting kink aspect the whole caption is "dressing this way is embarrassing." Giving credit without getting permission is actually even worse because now all the perverts know who you are.

>> No.9701618

>>9701516
Anon, how did you get these taken down? One of the commenters on post complaining about them being taken down also has stolen and posted minors, but I can't figure out how to report them without links to their age.

>> No.9701624

>>9701568
It's disgusting that these guys can't just get off to this shit in private, op is clearly getting off on the idea of publicizing this shit, they can't just keep it behind closed doors.
> wehh why do the big meanie lolis not want me to fetishize them?? ;(((

>> No.9701625

>>9701295
>first date
>first
>reading is hard
NAYRT but how hard is it to understand "don't lead with it"?

>> No.9701634

>>9701625
Anon, lolita is a fashion first and foremost, sure there's a definite hobby aspect to it, but it's unltinately just clothing. Wearing lolita on a first date (toned down, obviously swooping in there with full ott is just silly and impractical) is a great way of weeding out people right off the bat that are probably going to show opposition to the fashion, which you wouldn't be able to find out unless they kept that to themselves or you didn't wear it around them until later into the relationship/dating experience.

>> No.9701638

>>9701516
>despite putting credits on the shit I stole and warped into horrible filth, I still got reported for being a sick pedo
>why r u so mean

When I got to
>I wasn't doing anything illegal or even WRONG
I laughed so hard I couldn't breathe for a second.

>> No.9701639

>>9701618
I had to contact the help desk directly (not using the "report deviation" link on the submissions themselves), but they said in their response that that is not the "right way" of reporting someone's gallery, which is using the "report deviation" link.

Honestly, just contact the Help Desk directly at this point since you can't provide links to their age.

I hit "Contact" link at the bottom, but I can't really remember which links I clicked because they make you click a shitload of links before getting to the actual contact form itself.

>> No.9701641

>>9701625
Why not lead with it? No one is saying you have to go OTT.
I've had a handful of serious relationships since I got into lolita, and I would say that the least successful have been ones where I wasn't as open about my hobbies and ideals as I should have been on the first few dates. Nothing worse than dating and getting close to someone only to have them shit on your #1 hobby as soon as you bring it up.
Also, if you wear lolita on the regular, it's part of your daily life. I'm not going to change that for some potential date.

>> No.9701648
File: 262 KB, 296x539, FUCK OFF.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701648

>>9701639
Thanks, I'll try this.
>user in question
Just hide under a rock already.

>> No.9701651

>>9701568
>a single report
...moments before:
>347 individual reports

>> No.9701653

>>9701362
>It even benefits guys in a way
>>9701370
Feminism is not woman-only. It is for all femininity, gender equality, and females. Everyone posseses feminine aspects and feminism fails without an understanding of masculinity studies. Things like homophobia are literally a direct symptom of sexism and a fear of feminization. Continuing to say what guys can or cannot wear is akin to saying "don't be a faggot"
Oppression against males is linked to female oppression. We need to destroy all of it to achieve balance. You don't help shit-all by solely focusing on young women's issues. As if men don't have restrictive roles violently thrust upon them through life.
There is plenty of trauma for masc people in this hypermasculine world. No one is safe, don't kid yourself. Guys don't just breeze through life. Everyday is filled with moments a guy is blatantly or silently shamed/punished for liking something innocently. Not all women are feminine so how do you fight for them?
Be a selfish prick and be vocal about only the stuff that seemingly affects you or wise up, zoom out, and notice how violent and correctional our gender standards are for all the sexes.

>>9701568
>caring only about your kink and not the people you involved without permission
This is disgusting. So mad that people can't be assed to think past themselves. Anti-kinkshaming entitlement is a poison. No one has a right to air out their private inclinations all over the world. I'm exhausted...so much backwards shit has come out of the tumblr generation that it completely confounds the good social progress. Everyone just wants permanent acknowledgement and asspats. It's so immature and self-serving.

>> No.9701659

>>9701648
I still can't figure it out, and DA is seriously sickening me at this point. How is there no way to report this shit?

>> No.9701660 [DELETED] 
File: 30 KB, 587x274, good job.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701660

>>9700021
Nice.

>> No.9701673

>>9701660
Just a little late.

>> No.9701681
File: 434 KB, 317x232, tayne.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701681

>>9700386
Now THIS I can get into.

>> No.9701685

>>9701479
Have you considered making yourself a bleach cocktail?

>> No.9701688
File: 147 KB, 573x322, 1496093800611.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701688

>>9700811
he's so creepy wtf. I hate everything about this

>> No.9701694

>>9701659
Not that anon but I reported several of that pedo guy by going directly to the picture and clicking report. It asks for proof of age, but I just said look at the damn photo--it's obvious pedo shit.

>> No.9701703

>>9701479
Actually, you are creeping on people. You're not fucking welcome here.

>> No.9701707

>>9701694
I still can't get it reported, but I would seriously advise everyone ITT to check and see that their or their friends' photos haven't been used by the profiles. Check the profiles that have commented and faved these sorts of images. I'm honestly sick to my stomach going through these.

>> No.9701710

>>9701653
>Femisim is everything and every issue you can't care about people and equal rights without being one!!!
>Acting as though I don't care about men because I'm not a feminist
A little self awareness would go along way

>> No.9701718

>>9701516
God bless you.

>> No.9701723
File: 9 KB, 248x233, 517.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701723

>>9701653
You're right I forgot that if I don't label myself as a 'feminist' I can't care about equal rights! How dare I go against the collective, we can't slay the scary "hypermasculinity" if I'm not a good obedient feminist ally.

>> No.9701725

>>9701723
No one gives a shit about you and your shitty politics. Post sissies or gtfo, you creep.

>> No.9701727
File: 507 KB, 605x385, ace.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701727

>>9701479
Consider committing sudoku

>> No.9701734

>>9701171
I saw a picture of a London Underground Lolita on a facebook group I am in

>> No.9701735
File: 47 KB, 500x689, 1413424995749.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701735

>>9701725
>Implying I'm the one that brought up feminism

>> No.9701741
File: 70 KB, 960x866, 1503632206179.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701741

>>9701479

>> No.9701752
File: 108 KB, 500x671, 1500059137828.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701752

>>9701735
You're commenting, and no one cares.

>> No.9701755
File: 31 KB, 680x472, IMG_5649.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701755

>>9701741

>> No.9701759 [DELETED] 
File: 140 KB, 445x356, 1507600935384.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701759

>>9701755

>> No.9701773

>>9701283
Oh he did NOT like that. I just read through the creeps latest post comments. good on you anon's, this person is a fucking disgrace.

>> No.9701775

It's like you're all stalking this person, it's very creepy

>> No.9701776

>>9701775
>Defending that guy
>Not knowing doesn't work on /cgl/
Are you him anon

>> No.9701821

>>9701634
Lolita looks like a costume to those not in the know about it, so pretty much most people would think it's weird on a first date.

>> No.9701847

>>9701821
If you wear lolita all the time your date probably already knows. Unless you guys never meet anybody in person and just get dates online.

>> No.9701982

>>9701281
>>9701625
>being this embarrassed of your love of lolita
Why even bother participating if you're this weak willed?

>> No.9701988
File: 67 KB, 500x750, casu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9701988

>>9701821
Anyone who wears lolita on a regular basis isn't in OTT sweet 100% of the time.

>> No.9701994

>>9701653
I like you anon

>> No.9701995

>>9701988
i hope your definition of OTT sweet includes all of the wigs and props that go along with it, and not just a full pastel coord. for some reason, when people see pastels they automatically think "more effort."

>t. pastel vomit sweet lolita on a very regular basis

>> No.9702106
File: 21 KB, 429x500, 41YTJDPJ8GL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9702106

Fuckin LOL, Can find less acne-ridden white knights and SJWs in a packed convention than in this thread. Y'all are so fucking pent up sexually that you have no clue that none of these "captions" contain anything sexual in any way. These are fully clothed women with a story attached to them. You're just attaching your own sexual frustration onto them and making it into your own imagined ideas. Congratulations, everyone here has shown what they truly think of lolitas.

>> No.9702118
File: 32 KB, 480x360, hqdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9702118

>>9702106

>> No.9702120
File: 435 KB, 637x599, 1402875133104.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9702120

>>9702106
>punish
>diaper
>humiliated
>sissified
>completely emasculated
>daddy
???

>> No.9702121

I would like to thank all of you for showing me what kind of filth lurks around on 4chan.

You should all be ashamed of yourselves for harassing someone for doing what they love, you hypocrites.

>> No.9702122
File: 252 KB, 357x346, 1465183578725.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9702122

>>9702106

>> No.9702126
File: 181 KB, 625x626, 4bf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9702126

jfc just leave this thread already


sage

>> No.9702130

should we make a new thread in 17 posts?

>> No.9702137

>>9702121
The fact that there was someone's young daughter mixed in with a gallery full of disgusting sexual fantasies of a pedophile and people like you actually DEFENDING/ENABLING this behavior just astounds me.

If that was a photo of my child in a gallery with sexual captions and a grown man wearing diapers and dresses, I would be horrified.

Glad I reported him and DA took action. :)

Fuck off, degenerate.

>> No.9702153

Triggered white knights. "OMG, defend the poor, helpless lolitas because women are so defenseless and can't protect themselves from what I feel is offending to them!! Now we need to run off and make a new thread because we're being attacked (and exposed)"

Face it, you see these women dressing up the way they do and you stereotype that they are weak and fragile rather than strong, independent women expressing themselves with a bold fashion. Breaking news, they make look like a porcelain doll, but they sure as hell ain't made of it. And heaven-for-fucking-bid a man covets an ounce of that strength and wishes he could be like her for just a moment. Sorry, nobody sees them as sex symbols, it's only YOU.

>> No.9702163
File: 504 KB, 410x589, 1446016138392.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9702163

>>9702153
>they
Do you seriously think that posters in this thread are also guys? lmao
>heaven-for-fucking-bid a man covets an ounce of that strength and wishes he could be like her for just a moment
>strength
Guys getting off on inserting themselves into pictures of girls in frilly dresses is disgusting and deplorable. Find something else to channel your inner strength that doesn't involve pushing your kink onto strangers.

>> No.9702165

>>9702153
If anything we will just make a new thread bc this ones running out soon. Nothing to do with trying to escape or whatever.

>> No.9702166

if nothing else this thread had the glorious achievement of getting those deviations deleted

>> No.9702168

>>9702166
Wish it could delete the deviants from reality though.

>> No.9702171

>>9702137
I've read most of the captions before they were taken down, and never did they mention any sexually explicit content. The fact that you say that only proves that you are only harassing this person out of spite. Even if you make the claim that they were stealing photos of actual lolitas, how does that excuse reporting the captions that use pictures taken by the user?

Going on DA to call people fetishists is very similar to going on 4chan to call people cancerous trolls. Anyone can do it without context, and you're not the first.

Also, transgender people are a thing, so...

>> No.9702173

>>9702171
>how does that excuse reporting the captions that use pictures taken by the user?
not that anon, but that is the only thing I can be convinced about being uncalled for here

>> No.9702174

>>9702171
It doesn't have to be sexually explicit to be a part of their humiliation kink, which is what they're doing. They get off on the idea of becoming cute little girls, or being forced to wear cute little frilly dresses; it's disgusting and so are you for defending for this shit.

>> No.9702180

>>9702174
>They get off on the idea of becoming cute little girls, or being forced to wear cute little frilly dresses; it's disgusting and so are you for defending for this shit.

Well, I hope you and your drones are ready to report the entire ARTG tag, because they are far from being the only source of that kink.

>> No.9702181

>>9702180
Do everyone in that tag use stolen pictures of lolitas for their kink? Because if they don't I doubt anyone here cares.

>> No.9702184
File: 1007 KB, 1599x834, Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 9.16.47 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9702184

>>9699911
?, an angry african female in the congo , that put lipstick on a bird , scientist playing with powers of a bishop , yes everyone is royalty , and some females require being found in the congo , be cautious though , lions can climb ancient size plants , the congo jungle brain has to be found , and this is no cost information , thanks be to our only true friend , the divine infinite unity , the difinity , The Difinity , The Delta-Difinity , Θε Δελτα-Διφινιτυ ,.

>> No.9702185

>>9702163
Look up the definition of "preconceived notion." Tell me, where in the hell are you getting the idea that "guys are getting off" to these images? Because porn also happens to be on their deviant page, too? My God, that must mean that people with Disney drawings of underage princesses as well as pornographic images must also be whacking it to those underage princesses! And video games cause violence! And crime rates do go up because of ice cream sales! Gee-whizz, you hit the jackpot when it comes to reasoning! And if you want to say that ABDL is a sexual only fetish, I double-dog-dare you to go say that to the ABDL community.

Finally, nobody is pushing anything. It is you that are actively looking for this material so that you can get offended (turned on?) so that you can push your agenda of getting this shit banned because it either hurts your feelings or disgusts you based on what you believe is there. And if that's a good enough excuse for you, then we might as well ban dreadlocks because it is a black only hairstyle and throw anyone in jail that "manspreads" or "mansplains" without any evidence.

Y'all are a damn, pathetic, salt-filled joke. And FYI, these images are crawling all over Google, Pinterest, Tumblr, Wordpress, and so much more. And yet, they stay up after many years on those sites.

>> No.9702187

>>9702185
>these images are from google so it's okay if I make them into diaper fetishes!

Are you fucking retarded?

>> No.9702188

>>9702181
No, just like how this person actually bought the rights to use the photos that they do. They're willing to prove themselves if you don't want to take my word for it, but sort of doubtful that they would want to deal with cancerous 4chan garbage.

And FYI, they're currently uploading backups that they had. Congratulations, you just wasted everyone's time.

>> No.9702190

>>9702188
Nah, at least they know we have a presence now. Like the main guy said, he can't go up against an army.

>> No.9702192

>>9702187
This cherry you picked is delicious!

>> No.9702193

>>9700054
They like humiliation in controlled situations
They don't like the attention that could risk their comfortable position, just as some poster here reported their pictures and after their removal the creep is buttmad.

>> No.9702199

>>9702192
You out of all people in this thread would know how to pick the small cherries to pop, huh Pedo?

>> No.9702202

>>9702199
Holy shit... Now who is making pornographic images out of children? Holy shit... Disgusting, absolutely disgusting. Google "mental health clinics in my area" right now.

>> No.9702205

>>9702202
You sound like one of those MAP people trying to defend themselves kek

>> No.9702207

>>9702202
>Google mental health clinics near me"
While you're at it, why don't you look up the laws of copyright infringement, if you want to take the time to educate yourself.

>> No.9702215

>>9702188
just stop using the Lolita tags, the images, our culture.
stop trying to justify your fetish
how do you know about the backups? because you are part of that community and come here hoping to defend yourself
What you are doing is wrong
if you want to be a woman, go be trans
if you think being a woman is humilliating and you like that, GTFO, there is no defense for you. Go enjoy your shame away from us.

No time is lost if we can keep raiding these deviant sick fucks

>> No.9702219

>>9700018
wtf is lockable? As in, it has lock on it? How does that even work with a dress?

>> No.9702224

>>9702215
Um...DiaperedSteph literally said that he had backups on his "So this is why captioners leave deviantart..." post. I just came from that shit show, the comments are hilarious.

>> No.9702229
File: 42 KB, 480x477, 1506128666621.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9702229

>sissies enter this thread to defend stealing people's photos (including photos of underage Lolitas) for their nasty fetish, then threaten to "upload backups" when seagulls don't take kindly to their bullshit
This thread is a wild ride. Hope DA gets sick of this shit and pulls the plug on these sick fucks for good.

>> No.9702232

>>9702224
At least you can tell he's freaked out by this thread alone.

>> No.9702233

>>9702219
basically the zipper is locked so that way the dress can not come off.

However with a lolita dress I dont know how you would make it "lockable" I would think with most dresses the shirring would make it impossible to "lock"

>> No.9702235
File: 728 KB, 1224x637, Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 3.17.27 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9702235

>>9702215
Jesus Christ, it's not even just Lolitas. It's actual kids, too.
How is this even defensible? Pretending it's not a sexual thing won't work when it's as plain as day. Fucking diaperfags/AGPers need to be removed.

>> No.9702237
File: 68 KB, 698x267, ee.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9702237

>>9702224
So, this is how he ended up here.

>> No.9702238

>>9702235
Yep. That's what the most disgusting. I've also seen random girls at college parties that are definitely not stock photos or models. Why can't women and kids just be left alone? Why is it so hard? Why do they feel so entitled to us?

>> No.9702240
File: 201 KB, 750x1124, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9702240

>>9702235
>I will take as many photos as I please and use them for whatever fetish I have because I can and you can't stop me
> I'm against child abuse yet I take the mind of a sexually abused child, because I have preteen girls in my photos and they aren't naked then it's totally socially acceptable!!!
>I know what Loli is, but I will still associate shitty diapers with it because it's hot pls don't hate me!!!

>> No.9702244

>>9702237
>I still think I did nothing wrong
How can anyone be this dense?

>> No.9702246

>>9702229
Lol, you don't even know what the hell a "sissy" is.
1. They predate lolitas by YEARS (I've been trans for 12 years and this sissy wear is older than that)
2. As well as a similar dollish look, their dresses are incredibly short, involve a ton of satin or latex and stupidly frilly petticoats that put lolitas to shame. (See initial picture)
3. That's where the lockable fetishwear comes in. Dress can lock (I think the zipper in the back?) as well as mittens, shoes, and other accessories.

I'm not into it, but I run into it often enough of crossdressing/trans forums to know the difference between the two.

>> No.9702247

>>9702246
They can still stay in their fucking lane and leave us alone.

>> No.9702252

>>9702240
>Not my intention to trick anyone uwu please don't hate me uguu
Maybe consider that the issue isn't that you're "tricking" people intentionally, but you're using their photos (especially without permission. Saying "Oh, well, none of them ever contacted me asking me to remove them~" isn't an excuse, because you never fucking asked to begin with) for your gross kink bullshit. Even if it wasn't trashing the reputation of the fashion (but make no mistake, it definitely is), it infringes upon those people's consent and their right to not be involved in some strange man's sex play.
Maybe consider that using pictures of actual children for your transgender/age regression fantasies is going over the line and is actually really, really fucking disgusting (regardless of whether you paid for them or not - the people who sold the images to you probably didn't imagine you'd be using the kids' photos for something like this).
I can't stand people like this. They make excuses for their shitty actions.

>> No.9702257

>>9702246
And yet, they still think they're entitled to stealing photos of Lolitas for their fantasy captions instead of doing the respectful thing and sticking to photos of themselves and their friends in their hideous satin nightmare gowns.
This thread wouldn't even exist if they would stay in their place and stop stealing photos of J-fashion enthusiasts.
Go tell your sissy friends to fuck off, please and thanks.

>> No.9702258
File: 133 KB, 750x1334, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
9702258

>> No.9702259

>>9702240
Ladies and gentlemen, the reading comprehension of the average 4chan pissbaby

>> No.9702268

>>9702259
Read >>9702252 and take your bullshit elsewhere.

>> No.9702271

>>9702259
Ladies and gentlemen, the tard logic of a 50+ year old man who gets his kicks of children and women in gross humiliating sexual fantasies

>> No.9702273

>>9702246
Cool, go tell the sissies that so they will leave us out of it.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action