[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/cgl/ - Cosplay & EGL


View post   

File: 607 KB, 1440x1716, dontdomoitielikethis.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879182 No.9879182 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.9879185

>>9879182
Great start OP, nice vendetta you got there!

>> No.9879187

>>9879182
Who poops like that?

>> No.9879189

>>9879182
Is this a unflattering photo? Yes. Is it ita? No.

>> No.9879190

>>9879185
I saw this pic while scrolling tags and read that she wore it to see Mana. It made me cringe so I posted it. No idea who she is, if she's usually better dressed than this then I'm sorry for posting her, but even girls who usually look good can look ita at times.

>> No.9879191
File: 866 KB, 1440x1440, kamijobro.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879191

There is nothing remotely lolita or ouji about a confused looking tourist but he tagged it anyway.

>> No.9879195

>>9879182
Can you post a pic of the actual outfit so we can see if it's really ita or not?

>> No.9879197

>>9879190
Why won't you post a full outfit shot then? Afaik she modeled for Moitie at Sakuracon.

>> No.9879198

>>9879195
>>9879197
Literally don't know who she is. I found it in the moitie tag on instagram

>> No.9879203
File: 534 KB, 1440x951, whysothigh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879203

>>9879198
Okay I just found her again and most of her coords are elegant but I can't find a pic of the whole coord. Only pic related

>> No.9879231

>>9879185
I can’t really see the coord but this photo is trashy as fuck.

>> No.9879247

>>9879203
This girl needs to stop with this wannabe burlesque posing. Idgaf if she likes that glorified old timey stripping but she needs to keep lolita out of it

>> No.9879248
File: 243 KB, 932x720, 16FAA2F4-E5DD-4E5E-B4A7-0CE5EEC5B0BC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879248

>> No.9879252
File: 167 KB, 430x413, 348D32EB-A016-4219-8C7F-1AB256EA789D.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879252

>>9879203
Yikes
>>9879248
What the actual fuck?

>> No.9879254

>>9879189
those tights and shoes are ita as fuck

>> No.9879258

>>9879248
God I wish she would close her fucking mouth

>> No.9879260

>>9879198
>I found it in the moitie tag on instagram

How can you tell the coord is ita if it's not #lolitafashion or #eglcommunity tags? It could be just random gothic coord with moitie dress.

>> No.9879279
File: 141 KB, 540x960, 86F2B299-8E65-4D48-B6EF-7A00CE33ECC9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879279

Normally she looks cute but this is a mess

>> No.9879281
File: 113 KB, 540x960, 5421CCAD-A915-4CCD-B5A5-0B00C4D934B1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879281

>> No.9879284

>>9879248
Mouth breather

>> No.9879289
File: 1.41 MB, 1080x1065, Screenshot_20180512-105620~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879289

Please leave your fetishes out of the fashion.

>> No.9879292
File: 1.42 MB, 1080x1408, sketch-1526148220214.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879292

>> No.9879297
File: 1.08 MB, 1080x1073, Screenshot_20180512-110051~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879297

>> No.9879299
File: 2.64 MB, 1080x1337, Screenshot_20180512-105825~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879299

>> No.9879300

>>9879297
Holy shit people still look like scene queens in 2018?

>> No.9879312

>>9879260
Totally has those tags too.

>> No.9879314 [DELETED] 
File: 275 KB, 750x1191, EB5F2F8D-40C2-4D44-BAFF-F8C3DA77B5FB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879314

>> No.9879318

>>9879279
>>9879281
There's a lot to unpack here.

>> No.9879320

>>9879289
This looks cool, though. Nothing clashes, very cohesive. Not ita.

>> No.9879323

>>9879299
This just looks old school.

>>9879297
Outfit isn't bad. Hair and makeup kill it.

>> No.9879325

>>9879289
Vendetta

>> No.9879328

>>9879289
I like the bottom half actually, but everything in the top half is a complete mess.

>> No.9879335

>>9879297
Somebody help! Her face is melting!

>> No.9879384

>>9879299
You're an idiot

>> No.9879412

>>9879325
>>9879384
Sorry you both got posted

>> No.9879414

>>9879299
>>9879384

She is cute, but the dress looks cheap as fuck. Are we looking at the same pic??

>> No.9879427

>>9879320
>Nothing clashes, very cohesive.
I disagree, the shoulderless blouse, lace, leather straps, mask with ears and too many accessories on her torso and neck is too much. It could have looked cool, but any single element is just drowned out. If she really wants to keep the leather she should wear a blouse with less ruffles and drop the accessories except for the choker.

Like the bat wings on her ankles are cute and matches her shoes and fits the tights, it works because it's simple and not together with louder shoes or a bunch more leather straps on her legs.

>> No.9879459
File: 61 KB, 310x210, d02.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879459

>>9879292

>> No.9879460
File: 77 KB, 576x1064, Amino.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879460

oh amino...

>> No.9879478

>>9879414
that's literally an old school btssb dress

>>9879412
sorry you're fat and ugly unlike them, newfag

>> No.9879479
File: 140 KB, 720x720, tumblr_p8ddpckwLN1x1gex0o1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879479

>> No.9879481

>>9879182
It's trashy, and the tights or whatever are really tacky, but that's just a nitpick. The coord is fine otherwise

>> No.9879484

>>9879460
Does anyone on amino ever look good though?

>> No.9879493

>>9879185
Anon, she literally put glitter tights over her shoes. Are you fucking retarded or is this actually you? Given your comment was posted barely a minute later, I think we know the answer.

>> No.9879500

>>9879314
Anon, post the whole coord or GTFO. This is clearly a vendetta.

>> No.9879503

>>9879248
>Them yarn dreads
When you're too cheap to buy a real wig.

>>9879258
Looks like she has a terrible underbite, she might not be able to comfortably close it.

>> No.9879508

>>9879289
Old. And vendetta

>>9879297
>that waist shoop

>>9879299
not ita

>>9879412
sorry YOU got posted

>> No.9879541

>>9879414
Lol just seconding the another anon, that's a Btssb dress, and no, it has no hallmarks of trashy (raschel lace, shitty fabric, or poor construction).

>> No.9879542

>>9879248
Here again are we? Girl you need some improvement.

>> No.9879544

>>9879414
>t. newfag

>> No.9879588

>>9879297
I think the hair and makeup are adorable

>> No.9879593
File: 86 KB, 422x750, za krótka kieca, zły kolor na nogach, wtf pończochy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879593

>> No.9879594

>>9879541
Yeah oldschool dresses were actually really expensive. Crochet lace is lovely and ain't fucking cheap. The nice heavy cotton twill is also wonderful. There's all kinds of nice detailing and everything was just well made. I still like BTSSB but it just isn't as nice as it was 15 years ago. Those dresses were so well made and not cheap at all

>> No.9879595
File: 14 KB, 236x265, 1475002812578.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879595

>>9879593

>> No.9879596
File: 658 KB, 469x594, reeee.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879596

>> No.9879597
File: 389 KB, 495x596, reeeeeeeeee.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879597

>> No.9879598 [DELETED] 

>>9879594
Preach, anon! After getting some quality old school pieces, it's so hard to justify paying $300+ for the pieces brands put out now when I can get several old school pieces for that much. I really do want to directly support the brands, but I mostly just buy accessories from them (plus they probably make more profit off accessories anyway).

>> No.9879601
File: 491 KB, 478x600, re.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879601

>> No.9879602

>>9879596
Aww, she clearly has no idea what she's doing, but I bet she'd look great in an actual coord

>> No.9879603
File: 386 KB, 476x598, ree.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879603

"*×▪°•Things might get darker than u think " +•°▪ °• or serious, whichever happens; who knows •°▪ ( ̄▽ ̄;)ゞ"
dang

>> No.9879606

>>9879597
She was meaning to other lolita with that tag. It’s why I don’t look in that tag.

>> No.9879607

>>9879593
Cheap nasty replica

>> No.9879614

>>9879596
she has beautiful hair and a great body, please someone mentor her ffs

>> No.9879615

>>9879614
that moaning myrtle face though

>> No.9879619
File: 44 KB, 720x960, 1526080122730.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879619

reposting a few from last thread since had autosaged

>> No.9879620
File: 1.20 MB, 1440x2106, 1526092495004.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879620

>>9879619

>> No.9879621
File: 970 KB, 1080x1080, 1526079393587.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879621

>>9879620

>> No.9879623

>>9879621
>>9879619
>stretched cane toad fat mouth
I'm curious what girls who have faces like this look like when they lose weight. Do their faces and mouths still stay all wide and stretched?

>> No.9879624

>>9879248
she looks like ariel burdett, that crazy woman who auditioned for xfactor years ago, who incidentally did get fat

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVhuO2zq4EA

>> No.9879684

>>9879314
this is actually the best she's ever looked. has her chin been shopped?

>> No.9879688

>>9879297
does she have a photo of herself on her wall or is that someone else??

>> No.9879689

>>9879601
right needs a new pair of glasses. they hide your eyebrows gurl!

>> No.9879690

>>9879187
All of Asia.

>> No.9879691

>>9879318
more like a lot to pack up. her room looks like a mess

>> No.9879694

>>9879623
no.

>> No.9879735

>>9879279
damn bitch clean your room

>> No.9879739

>>9879297
>waist shoop to make it smaller
ok fine
>hair shoop to make it bigger
um what

>> No.9879742

>>9879690
She's White

>> No.9879743

>>9879189
Is this it’s? DO YOU HAVE EYES?

>> No.9879744

>>9879289
Please keep your in creative and closed minded twisted knickers to yourself you pleeb.

>> No.9879763

>>9879289
Those ankle wings, what term can I search to find them? I really like them.

>> No.9879771

>>9879763
Bat Wing Cuffs.

>> No.9879772

>>9879763
>>9879771
>http://aetherlund.storenvy.com/products/5978242-batwing-cuffs-in-black

>> No.9879774

>>9879771
>>9879772
ty!

>> No.9879788

>>9879460
When you got a meet at 12 and a marathon at 2...

>> No.9879789
File: 10 KB, 500x414, 6DA16768-404C-4D4F-9238-66E671324CBB.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879789

>>9879742

>> No.9879798

>>9879601
i didn't know idubbbz wore lolita

>> No.9879800

>>9879191
There's something really special about an eighteen year old long past the point of dadbod pudgy goth, who from a distance looks like a menopausal obasan having a midlife crisis, calling himself ouji and lolita. What a time to be alive. From the way his fingers look? He already has insulin resistance, type two beetus in three, two, one...

>>9879203
That is pretty disgusting though. When was Lolita ever about letting your ass hang out? Mana sama doesn't want to fuck that, he'd probably faint confronted with that.

>>9879299
This isn't that bad? The color of the lipstick maybe, but compared to the dumpster fires in this thread.

>> No.9879802

>>9879414
It's not my taste either, but that's not a cheap ebay dress. She looks fine.

>>9879493
I concur. It's not Lolita, it's gothic whore fashion.

>> No.9879803

>>9879597
>prostitot kei

>> No.9879804

>>9879601
Right is okay, left might try investing in a full length mirror before she goes out.

>> No.9879806

>>9879603
What look or pose is she going for? Cocksucker is not a Lolita substyle.

>>9879619
That's like a walking do not resuscitate order.

>> No.9879807

>>9879248
She has such a nice garden/park to work as a backdrop, I am envious of that

>> No.9879808

>>9879624
lmao. She just went out to an audition on national TV and world-wide on web, basically screaming
>I HAVE A CLUSTER B PERSONALITY DISORDER, am 100% delusional, AND SHOULD BE LOCKED UP!

>> No.9879824

>>9879596
shes going to find the sorcerers stone

>> No.9879829

>>9879248
For some reason all I can hear is heavy mouth breathing noises and some lisp coming from this.

>> No.9879834
File: 175 KB, 800x1209, F50BBC31-6363-4B32-87A5-271A018BF531.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879834

>>9879493
>she literally put glitter tights over her shoes.

Anon, those are the actual shoes. https://www.shopakira.com/sparkly-glitzy-and-glamour-sexy-heeled-boots

Just look for two minutes on google under “glittery thigh high heels” and you find them.

>> No.9879837
File: 45 KB, 640x640, TomikoLolitaDress.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879837

Why do goths have such atrocious sense of style and quality? Killstar need to stay in their own lane.

>> No.9879845

>>9879837
OT, but I have a sweet spot for these edgy goth designs, but quality is always horrible. I saw a dress like this when I was at a con, lace is even worse in person. Even normie raschel lace is softer than this shit. It looked like litteral plastic.

>> No.9879851

>>9879297
Wow this is a banger look, I wish I was a scene queen like this (less shoop. Not shit)

>> No.9879852

>>9879845
As a gothic and a lolita the shit quality of most gothic fashion has me so salty, and they charge just as much for it regardless

>> No.9879855

>>9879460
Ok can someone give a link to the amino amino? I thought I’d joined the right one but I never see any jfashion on it.

>> No.9879879

>>9879593
hi fellow polefag. Please tell me this isn't anyone from the Polish comm

>> No.9879882

>>9879834
Not that anon but those aren't fucking lolita shoes those are straight up corner working shoes

>> No.9879884

>>9879289
This is cute as fuck

>> No.9879900

>>9879882
I never said they where lolita shoes. Just showed they where not glittery tights over shoes with a link. You lack reading comprehension.

>> No.9879949

>>9879203
Yeah this is bad. She wore this to see Mana?

>> No.9879950
File: 181 KB, 750x710, 7AE6910D-3F91-4B67-B407-0521FDC89F3C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9879950

Tagged as lolita, fairy kei, larme kei, gyaru

girl apparently thinks shes some kind of popular youtube entertainer on top of it

>> No.9879952

>>9879594
I could be wrong, but isn't this dress a recent release for their 30th anniversary/old school btssb line?

>> No.9879965

>>9879952
I have one of Baby's rereleased "Classical" pieces and its construction and materials are solid and not cheap at all, neither is the Babydoll JSK that the op posted. Op probably thinks that all black/white pieces are automatically ita, which is why they're a dumb newfag.

>> No.9880005

>>9879837
Killstar used to be the cheap jeans and tshirts division of Lip Service, which tended to use nicer materials. Everything changed when the owner passed away and as far as I can tell it's now Hot Topic level. I vaguely wonder if Jeannie Nitro is still in business. All the "cool" goth girls used to have this one specific velvet dagger dress.

>> No.9880008

>>9879834
That makes it better?

>> No.9880009

>>9880008
Read>>9879900

>> No.9880010
File: 22 KB, 194x400, 49.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880010

>>9880005
I remember when Lip Service released their own shit takes on what they thought was lolita and they were equally hideous, if not worse. You see similar shit from goths trying to dress lolita, even if they don't pick out clothes from goth brands for their attempts; still don't understand why goths have such an unfortunate lack of standards when it comes to aesthetics if they think this shit looks good.

>> No.9880013

>>9880005
Yeah, Lip Service used to make some decent stuff and then it started all looking bad quality. Didn't know the details though.

>> No.9880015

>>9879965
Anon you replied to. Exactly, I actually really wanted that release too.

>> No.9880016

>>9880015
They have released some of their classical pieces in different fabric and lace, including some odd tulle lace version of Shirring Princess that looked downright terrible; but most of them are gorgeous and well made.

>> No.9880019
File: 47 KB, 461x720, c78bfa30e11f7a27f1205a737b68bfa7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880019

>>9880010
Goths (unless they are romantic goths who gravitate towards Moitie or EGA) are a special kind of shit at lolita. The only goth brand I can think of that was almost successful with our aesthetic is Restyle.

>> No.9880030

>>9880019
>that shopped waist

>> No.9880053

>>9880010
Here's a secret about goths that nobody seems to have told you already: there are people who dress fabulously and have expensive wardrobes with silk velvets, vintage victorian laces, handmade corsets from Dark Garden or wherever. And there are people who shop at the mall or buy anything shiny at Goodwill. And everything in between (much like lolita! Gasp!). That LS fauxlita series was near the end iirc. They did one in dobby cotton with ribbons a few years previously that was rather nice.

>> No.9880056

>>9880053
Oh I'm aware, I'm talking about the endless "loligoth" attempts that subculture keeps shitting out. Then again maybe it's because goth is more about music than fashion so they feel like they can get away with cutting corners and just using whatever they have in their closets, and that a "close enough" attempt at lolita is enough to count.

>> No.9880059

>>9879950
???
A darker iteration of larme kei I can possibly see, and maybe (ita) Lolita, but what about this is Fairy Kei or Gyaru?

>> No.9880167
File: 170 KB, 746x716, C37F1F90-B7FA-4F4D-A9EC-BF18240337CF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880167

>> No.9880172
File: 171 KB, 750x580, 24533635-A1AC-4B68-9ACC-00E09626C87B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880172

>>9880167

>> No.9880174

>>9880172
My eyes scanned this image for a sec, then immediately went to the... maid cosplay? How did I not see that first?

>> No.9880177

>>9879743
It’s a nitpick at worst calm the fuck down

>> No.9880178

>>9880010
>still don't understand why goths have such an unfortunate lack of standards when it comes to aesthetics if they think this shit looks good.

isn't it great desu? lolitas treat the whole thing so seriously like if it was an actual job they're payed for

>> No.9880190

>>9880167
Oh, come on. This looks like she is only showing up the dresses

>> No.9880212

>>9880010
>show me on the doll where the bad goth touched you.
>>9880053
This

Much like lolita, some goths look fabulous and know how to dress well. And some don't and buy shitty stuff from killstar.

You sound salty af about goth for some reason anon. And from your comments it's pretty obvious you don't know that much about it.

>> No.9880217

>>9880212
I'm a goth myself actually, just recognizing that many goths have a shit perception of what lolita is.

>> No.9880221

>>9880212
>point out goths are shit at lolita
>y-you don't know anything about goth
lol what

>> No.9880237
File: 89 KB, 768x960, flannellolita.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880237

Skirt - Bodyline
Boots - Harley Davidson
Everything Else - Offbrand

ok.

>> No.9880240

>>9879189
A pretty face does not make this not-ita. Nothing about this coord other than the dress is even remotely lolita.

>> No.9880243

>>9879248
Ah man this just makes me sad. I'm also an Ugly Girl with an unfortunate jawline, but at least I try my best to coordinate well and counteract my natural ugliness through flattering cosmetics and decent coordination.

Comments like "mouth breather" and the like are shitty yeah but if you downplay your unfortunate genetics people won't comment that as much.

You don't have to settle for this!! Even us ugly girls can have "good angles" if we coordinate properly and make the best of the features we have to work with!

>> No.9880245

>>9879593
>>9879597
>>9879603

God I fucking hate these pedo-bait ddlg bitches. Be a degenerate in your private space if you have daddy issues to work out and can't afford a therapist, but don't fucking post it in lolita tags.

>> No.9880246

>>9879601
The proportion of the dress on the right is so weird, is it a replica?

>> No.9880247

>>9880167
I thought we were over making fun of obviously non-coordinated "try on" photos. Yeah it's dumb and you should at least wait the 3 minutes it takes to put on a blouse before you post new dress pics, but it's not fair to call it "ita" if it's clearly not a full outfit.

>> No.9880252

>>9880237
I like that she was experimenting, yet this does not seem like the answer at all. (I am talking about the flannel)

>> No.9880267

>>9880252
She's a cosplayer with a few bodyline pieces and no other lolita, so experiment she did. Yikes.

>> No.9880285
File: 144 KB, 720x960, 0E8F7B97-C4E5-4759-9151-0004FC7CBE92.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880285

She’s at it again. This time mixing fairy kei and lolita

>> No.9880286
File: 140 KB, 720x960, 343A9232-71C9-4682-B831-32AB7791B7FD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880286

>> No.9880287
File: 147 KB, 720x960, 35BAC0E4-1715-4C6C-8808-22EADB1AFFE0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880287

No vandetta against her as person, just the outfits

>> No.9880288
File: 127 KB, 720x960, EE9A0115-2AEF-4B1B-8A44-E205D5FDB383.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880288

Last one

>> No.9880292
File: 142 KB, 720x960, 9F9921C4-98E0-46C4-A35F-C52C3045B777.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880292

I lied

>> No.9880317

>>9880286
Her limbs are so meaty..

>> No.9880330

>>9879299
This is really fucking cute, are you ok anon?

>> No.9880332

>>9880178
I too love it that people are ok dressing like the trash they are, this thread wouldn’t exist without people that have no standards.

>> No.9880360
File: 14 KB, 249x287, 1526168111379.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880360

>>9879601

>> No.9880374

>>9880292
>>9880288
>>9880287
>>9880286
>>9880285
holy fuck this person looks like a living embodiment of everything bad about tumblr. also are those tattoos on her arms???? can fatty chans please be banned from ugly, big black blotches on their already hideous ham hocks they call arms. cos clearly they don't have the good taste to recognise what looks good and what doesnt

>> No.9880398

>>9880243
Or cover your jawline with your hand like most seem to do in their selfies.

>> No.9880399

>>9880374
What makes it worse is she has a boy she dresses in the same manner

>> No.9880404

>>9880399
Someone should call CPS.

>> No.9880423
File: 105 KB, 750x752, whysoshoulder.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880423

>>9879195
>>9879197
Looks like she found out about this thread...she casually posted this today under the moitie tag again

>> No.9880426

>>9880423
What's the name if this dress? It's cute.

>> No.9880437

>>9880423
Those boots should only be with by actual prostitutes or club thots, not elegant at all

>> No.9880438

>>9880423
This looks better and she is a very pretty girl, but... I just really can't see what sort of a look she's going for? It's just so half assed, even for ero lolita. The OP and shoes don't look good together, the shoulders look like she awkwardly forced down sleeves that are meant to be on the shoulder, the wrist things look weird and too big, and it feels like the picture is meant to have a glam look that just isn't coming through. Just because the OP is Moitie doesn't mean the whole coord looks cohesive and opulent or elegant, just look at manasan.

I'm willing to accept that the shoes could maybe work if she had longer gloves made of a similar material, a silver bracelet at the wrist and a larger matching necklace, the sleeves on her shoulders, an updo, larger canotier and possibly a black veil with silver edging. But even then it would probably still look wrong and not lolita enough.

>> No.9880459

>>9880426
MmM Jewelry Print

>> No.9880484 [DELETED] 

>>9880243
It’s okay, Anon. Lolitas are generally ugly as shit in general and just this fashion to distract from it. You ever see most of these whores outside of the fashion at all? It’s sad.

>> No.9880520

>>9879900
So you were just wanting to correct someone even though it didn't matter?

>> No.9880526

>>9880520
Keep talking about it susan. Maybe if you doo, this thread will get deleted like your intending.

>> No.9880529
File: 54 KB, 686x960, 32293876_10104431822374720_8004550190440644608_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880529

>> No.9880540
File: 361 KB, 1059x1600, 1526170253477.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880540

Reposting here because Darla

>> No.9880541
File: 229 KB, 1000x877, 2E906A00-60A2-4666-87FF-73A220452121.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880541

>>9880484

>> No.9880542

>>9880288
her kid in that freaked me the fuck out I didn't see him at first

>> No.9880543

>>9880438
>suggesting a canotier and a veil
conlita detected

>> No.9880546

>>9880540
Is this lolita though? It looks like some sort of weird renaissance meet. Was the theme renissance?

>> No.9880549

>>9880529
ita-chan have pity on that poor dress i beg of you

>> No.9880553

>>9880540
Someone put that wig out of its misery

>> No.9880559

>>9880292
Who is this and where do I find more?

>> No.9880566

>>9880542
Where?

>> No.9880568

>>9880529
Fatty Chans, please stop trying to use belts to "define your waist." It just becomes very apparent that you have no waist, and the cheap quality of the belts is so sad. The poor fit and her belly fat l/ back fat is actually more noticeable because of the belt

>> No.9880594

>>9880540
She has such dead eyes that I thought this was a creepy mannequin at some sort of museum.

>> No.9880627

>>9880374
To me the most painful part is knowing I would have attempted something like this in high school if I'd had internet then. All I had for inspiration was MTV and Claire's, and that looked bad enough.

>> No.9880632

>>9880543
she's already wearing a canotier

>> No.9880635

>>9880566
Lol nayrt but in here >>9880287

>> No.9880640

>>9879289
The only thing I don't like are the cross straps, and that's just because they make it too busy.

I dig the mask. I know it's a fetish mask, but it at least looks nice and HQ

>> No.9880642

>>9880246
I think she did something fucked to the top of the dress. Look at the bodice and the print alignment on it. The skirt portion looks right too me, but that top...

>> No.9880656
File: 95 KB, 595x394, 1474839385603.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880656

>>9880438
>manasan

>> No.9880662
File: 104 KB, 480x640, 43d20042-70d2-5dbd-9dfb-3d0ab5673747.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880662

>>9880246
>>9880642

I think she might just be too tall and maybe just a touch too busty for it. The original print doesn't align the bodice print either, but you can also see the bust points are parallel to the second pearl down, and the dress is actually low-waisted enough that the dress waist almost hits the hips on the mannequin.

On the girl her bust is somewhere after the third or fourth pearl, which means she's squishing her boobs into the part of the dress that's getting narrower, not the part that's cut for boobs. And the "low waist" doesn't really look like it's even past her waist, but the bodice would certainly have been nipped in for the waist and out again for the hips, while her body isn't curving that way. I think that's what makes the dress look weird on her, all the bust and waist points are in all the wrong places.

I wonder how IW does it so that tall girls can still wear their long dresses? I know some anon mentioned that their long lengths often have an extra inch in the torso, but do they move the bust and waist down as well?

>> No.9880672

>>9879852
That's been a long-term pet peeve of mine as well. Drives me nuts.

>> No.9880674

>>9880635
whoops ty I linked to the wrong one.

>> No.9880675

>>9880568
Agreed, this would look far better without the sad belt. And with a bolero/cardi instead of the sad t-shirt to hide the unflattering fit of the dress.

>> No.9880676

>>9880237
Cute outfit but I wouldn't call it lolita

>> No.9880679
File: 13 KB, 634x172, no.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880679

Can something be ita even before you see it?

>> No.9880680

>>9880662
In garment making, when you add length to a piece, you generally add the length in different parts of the pattern, not just in one place. It's likely they add a bit above the bust, a bit below and a bit below the waist.

>> No.9880693

>>9880237
cosplayers pls go

>>9879601
why would you tailor a dress to be this fucked

>> No.9880706

>>9880437
Agreed entirely

>> No.9880707

>>9879297
sometimes I wish 13 yo me had had the balls to pull off hair like that
then I remember most scene chicks have major daddy issues.
how do you even get hair like that, though? a wig?

>> No.9880735

>>9880627
Glad that you didn't slip. We all see people that remind us of our former selfes and look at them with pity, because they haven't developed further yet.

>> No.9880742

This is quite annoying how anon is not hesistating to post pics from people's own pages. I can understand bringing stuff from CoF, but can we at lest respect peoples personal spaces?

> but they are in public access, why don't they close their accounts then?

it's not CoF, anon, people are not obligated to entertain you with looks you'd like to see. Why don't you bring just random normies for wearing some ugly loliable shirts then? It's has lace on it, totally valid reason to harass people!

> but that girl in moitie dress posted it under #lolitafashion tag

Anon clearly said they found it from moitie tag. Sounds like that 5 seconds rule. Anon sees that shit with #moitie tag being like "Hmm, can I bring it to ita thread?", then looks for lolita fashin tag be like " Oh, it has #lolitafashion, okay then"

> sorry, you got posted

Apparently, it's unnecessary to be posted on ita thread to understand that people needs the safe spaces and will only appreciate criticism, when it's beeen asked. I guess, we should have a rule for people's personal accounts.

Tl;dr me waisting time to talk to a robot

>> No.9880743

>>9880543
I'm a daily lolita, I just genuinely like veils.

>> No.9880748

>>9880742
You seem upset that or someone you admire got posted. Good for you.

The thing is is the internet is not a safe place. The best thing you can do when you are posted negatively like here is either remove yourself from the negative area and not know of its existence, or take it as a learning experience and improve yourself so you don’t end up here.

If you find it horrible that you find yourself here, you can’t argue that you post yourself of the internet to not garner attention and admiration from others. That takes it away from “I’m doing what i want” to “ I want you to like me and give me attention”. If you really where posting in a pubic place for the fun and for yourself, you wouldn’t go to threads like this or forums where people talk trash to let off some opinions without others knowing who they where.

No one has to like you or feel the need to verify you and agree with you. But you also don’t have to agree with them. Don’t get upset when someone posts you here. Either leave the page and do what you want, or improve something so they like you if that’s what you want. It’s your choice, and they don’t have to tip toe around you to make you feel welcomed. In the case of this lolita, it’s really her shoes that kill it. Before it was stated that the shoes do not match the lolita aesthetic. And the poses really don’t help her cause. The fashion is stylish because it’s modest. Showing your thighs, your undergarments and wearing essentially flashy hooker heels isn’t modest.

>> No.9880765

>>9880742
it's also like, really easy to not get posted to the ita thread. there's two rules to follow. don't dress badly. and don't be a twat. i don't feel sorry at all for people who get posted here.

>> No.9880790

>>9879289
I think the pendant/brooch with the sigil, and the rosette at her waist with the planchette and tassels are both off-theme and cluttering the coord, but I don't think it's ita, and while I know Lolita has fetish image-problem, the association is with dd/lg and adult babies, not pony dommes - plus the average ignorant normie is going to see this as a Goth outfit, not a Lolita outfit, and there's more of a legitimate overlap between the fetish and Goth scenes (although not all Goths are fetishists or want to be associated with it).

>> No.9880792

>>9879297
Is that a wig styled to be scene? I like this as a scene outfit (minus excessive shoop) but not as a Lolita outfit. If she'd called this scene or 'pastel Goth' or whatever, I'd be totally fine with this. I actually have that skirt, and wear it for Goth outfits, but it's definitely not Lolita.

>> No.9880793

>>9879279
It's not just her outfit, it's her room. Yikes, that needs a serious de-clutter, plus all that clutter with bright red walls just makes it look even MORE overbearing.

>> No.9880794

>>9880765
>and don't be a twat
Since when is that enforced? People have admitted in this very thread that they post whatever pictures they find in relevant tags of cringeworthy outfits.

>> No.9880797

>>9880292
I like the colour scheme she went for with her hair and make-up, but it's just so badly done - her eyes look utterly caked in eyeliner, her hair is nice colours but it looks limp and lank, and those giant eyebrows take over her face. Her lipstick is an purples she used for the rest of her make-up; she should have gone for black, teal, or the deep plum in her eyebrows.

Not to mention she has a fucking gift-wrap bow on her head, and she's wearing dark tumblr make-up with pastels...

>> No.9880798

>>9880526
Nayrt, but the intent of the original anon was obviously to point out that those shoes are fucking tacky. Sure, they're shoes and not just glitter tights over shoes, constantly reiterating that while everyone else still points out that the shoes and outfit are awful reinforces that you've completely missed the point.

>> No.9880800

>>9880056
Goth *is* more about music than fashion, so some Goths just don't really care whether they look good or not, and yeah, there's quite a few Goths who don't really know what Gothic Lolita actually is and do a terrible appropriated version of it. However, there's also plenty of actually well-dressed Gothic Lolitas that are ALSO Goth, and well-dressed Goths who wear decent clothes. Older Goths tend to be better dressed because they a) know it's something they're sticking with so are willing to invest in quality pieces, b) have the money for them in the first place and c) have the experience to dress well - lots of teenagers going through a phase dress badly, partly because they want to instantaneously 'achieve' a dark & edgy look, and partly because they can't afford decent clothes and can't persuade their parents to buy them. Plus there's SHIT TONNES of cheap shit marketed to them (and expensive shit, here's looking at you Killstar) online. Like, not just tacky 'Goth' clothing companies that make hallowe'eny crap, but really, really REALLY cheap mass-produced stuff coming out of China being sold on eBay and Amazon for a couple of bucks. It's a plague in Goth the way Milanoo was in Lolita a few years back, but unlike Lolita, which is fashion based subculture and thus collectively was willing to go "LEAVE THAT ALONE", Goth which is at its core more about music, and does try to be inclusive was like 'well, at least they're trying' about it.

>> No.9880806

>>9879191
I don't think he's Goth - he's wearing a Kamijo t-shirt, and he's visual kei (Gothic aesthetic, but not Goth music) and his trousers and choppy hair make me think he's going for Gothic VK aesthetic rather than a Goth one - but he's still not Lolita or Ouji and looks like "wtf? why are you photographing me??"

>> No.9880813

>>9880030
I think we've got a new meme here, everybody.
>>9880540
I'd ditch the headpiece, seamripperoo that awful lace trim, and wear the heck out of this. Oh, and remove the beads going across neckline.

>> No.9880819

>>9880806
He literally tagged it #lolitafashion and #oujikei.

>> No.9880858

>>9880794
I don't think you get it. I mean if you're not a fuckin cunt to people you're much less likely to get posted on the ita thread. Vendettas etc

>> No.9880865

>>9880858
This. People who behave poorly and dress okay can still be considered an ita. It’s a loose form of ita but it isn’t any less ita if they are just down right insufferable. See BLM chan and FFC/FCC. They wouldn’t get posted so much if they hadn’t posting dumb shit in response in the first place.

>> No.9880890

>>9880858
>Vendettas
are you serious? vendettas are about the insecurities of the poster and have nothing to do with the person posted. ita thread has to do with coords. you could be the sweetest cupcake in the world, but if you dress like a mess and call it lolita you're gettin' posted.

lurk more.

>> No.9880895

>>9880890
jfc are you retarded? i mean actually? no shit ita thread has to do with coords. you're just WAY more likely to get posted in one if you're an infamous shitbag because people are paying attention to you and already don't like you.

>> No.9880907

>>9880895
Nayrt, but this is damn obvious. K8 has never been looking as terrible as people bitched about. Seeing this >>9879289 girl here is especially amusing, because she's become "ita" as soon as people begun recognise her coords. I'd say ita thread is more about people's insecurities rather than poor coording. Confident person would barely post it here, especially when it comes to posting old ita content.

>> No.9880916

>>9880529
Burn her save the dress

>> No.9880932

>>9880742
>safe spaces
I'm sorry, I'm all for people with yknow, actual issues with oppression having places they can be themselves without worry, but "dressed in the dark" is not an oppressed culture. If you (or whoever your friend is) can't handle the idea of people taking their pictures off public spaces and saying mean things about them, they should lock down their privacy. If you think a bunch of catty lolitas making snarky comments is the worst place your photos can end up, I highly advise against delving further into that rabbit hole. People get their photos snapped up to post on sissy/ddlg blogs with creepy roleplay captions, posted to "roast me" threads on reddit, or plain ole saved by people (people they know even!) to whack off to later.

Grow a thicker skin.

>> No.9880934
File: 268 KB, 1770x1770, 458781A0-4232-4C10-B34F-435A33DB963E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880934

Respect - LOST
Sage for beating a dead horse.

>> No.9880935

>>9880794
>>9880748
Hey, you know what? You're 100% right. I agree wholeheartedly with your proposal. Can you tell us which post is yours and we can all report it to get it removed together? I'm emailing admins about this new rule right now.

>> No.9880942

>>9880934
BMT idk why you bother trying to talk to her. She thinks "take a break, lay low, stop dredging up weeks/months old drama" means she has to NEVER PARTICIPATE IN THE COMMUNITY AGAIN and/or that you're VICTIM-BLAMING HER FOR BEING BULLIED. She's clearly not willing to listen to anyone, even her friends. The only way she could conceivably get past this now is if everyone stops giving her attention for it.

>> No.9880950

>>9880942
Fair enough, I was only responding to her video, because it was very sad to see her like this, and I was supporting her up until now because she’s never been outwardly rude to me, she just does a lot of silly things. But after this incident, she has made it undoubtedly clear that she does not want my support, and therefore she no longer has my support.
I’m simply disappointed in her attitude towards the situation. Even with first hand experience of doing a fuck ton of autistic screeching and being driven out of the community, she still feels that she’s on top of the world. Serves me right for trying to be friendly and help someone who needs it.

>> No.9880962

>>9880950
god bmt just shut up and stop posting no1curr

>> No.9880966

>>9880950
>do a me
>posts "incident" to ita thread...on /cgl/
kek you gave her advice you don't even follow.
you think so highly of your ability to help and you can't even see that you're a hypocrite that's in this for look-how-great-I-am points.

it's not a big deal but you are part of what is blowing it out of proportion and keeping it current.
>waaaaah, she didn't take my advice and publicly disagreed with it
>better make it worse just to spite her for not seeing how much real care I had for her up until now uwu

>> No.9880970
File: 130 KB, 680x511, C3E2F75E-8605-4216-A917-75BE681FC23E.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9880970

>>9880962
>>9880966

>> No.9880972

>>9880934
>>9880950
Agree with >>9880966 you're just making the both of you look crazier and more obsessed with this drama. It would have been barely a blip on the community radar if not for Claire and you trying to bring it back up each week.

>> No.9881000

OMG it's not fucking rocket science....

Rule: don't look like crap and tag it Lolita or ouji. If you look like crap, and your pic exists somewhere in a public post (Amino, CoF, a public Insta, etc) and you tag it as lolita, fairy kei, decora, ouji, whatever J-fashion, you are fair game.

I do, however, have a problem with pics posted in closed groups on FB ending up here. Seen it happen, and it's not cool. If that person wanted their pic everywhere, they would have posted publicly.

If you are a douche and post douchey, cringey things on your public accounts, you are also fair game. Don't be an internal ita, either.

>> No.9881008

>>9880742
Please stop "waisting" our time.
This is how this board works.
She intended it to be lolita and it looks trashy.
The world isn't some magic hugbox.
Cry more.

>> No.9881124

>>9881008
Excellent haiku, anon.

>> No.9881171

>>9880010
Not 100% sure because I haven't touched Lip Service since the owner died, but I think that release was a halloween costume, they had a halloween branch/side thing iirc.

>> No.9881183

>>9880568
Why does every fat ass try shit like this and then call themselves “hourglass” shaped? You’re not hourglass/coke bottle shaped if you’ve got a spare tire bulging out beneath whatever shit you’ve got wrapped under your fat tits.

>> No.9881214
File: 136 KB, 960x960, 32377671_1974288489553866_3274896847914663936_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9881214

this is the new jetj release, 43k yen. looks like cheap-ass taobao clip art.

>> No.9881233

>>9881214
Oh no... Is that what they'll be trying to sell at their tea Party in Paris?

>> No.9881261

>>9881214
>clip art lace
Why not use actual lace appliques? For that price it would be totally do-able.
>JetJ
oh yeah

>> No.9881271

>>9881124
Tanka, actually.

>>9881214
Woooow. That's something...

>> No.9881272

>>9880529
Isn't this some poor anon's dream dress?

>> No.9881303
File: 291 KB, 2048x2048, D125EECA-CC9C-48A6-A8D1-7B9665CBAD20.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9881303

>> No.9881347

>>9879601
Regardless, I want right’s shoes.

>> No.9881352

>>9879950
I’m seeing Stevie Nicks

>> No.9881373

>>9881272
I wouldn't say its my dream dress, but I've always liked it and seeing that fatty-chan disfigure it like that makes me very sad :(

>> No.9881469
File: 331 KB, 750x1153, 4D635CBB-0038-4EE8-AD4E-EACF5024362A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9881469

#plussizelolita is a goldmine

>> No.9881470

>>9881352
Damn that's fucked up. What did Nicks ever do to you?

>> No.9881477
File: 210 KB, 750x747, 061B66C4-CAFC-4812-B170-761C56CCEBCC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9881477

>> No.9881483
File: 263 KB, 750x1097, 21012B84-8E11-4D70-B70D-F793B858F6FD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9881483

>> No.9881485

>>9881469
I dont hate this, it's just not lolita

>> No.9881487
File: 201 KB, 750x740, 60A9A11B-B28A-41E4-9BD9-0151054E8AA8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9881487

>> No.9881488

>>9881469
>hottopiclakewood

mfw this lives in my area

>> No.9881490

>>9881487
fat =\= ita. This is a nitpick at best.

>> No.9881494

>>9881487
That poof is honestly pretty impressive

>> No.9881500

>>9881487
Kinda sad that the only thing that makes it ita is that she's fat. The coord is nice and so is her hair and her face can even maybe be cute.

>> No.9881502

>>9881490
No but a cheap, shitty ageplay looking dress from amazon sure as fuck is

>> No.9881504
File: 75 KB, 960x480, 1520385237106.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9881504

>>9881483
>abdl
Mana-sama preserve us

>> No.9881507

>>9880237
everything else aside, how did BL ever release something as good as this skirt? RIP

>> No.9881508

>>9880285
>>9880286
>>9880287
>>9880288
>>9880292
JFC more like unseelie-kei

>> No.9881509

>>9881502
That's bodyline, anon. Still not amazing, but much better quality than amazon dresses. that JSK in particular actually has pretty nice cotton torchon lace on it too. it's not terrible, just not brand quality, obviously

>> No.9881510

>>9880237
She's cute but this is awful, even for experimental/punk

>> No.9881513

>>9880942
>>9880962
man do i need to unblock BMT again for some good cringe

>> No.9881515

>>9881487
>>9881490
>>9881494
>>9881500
serious question, where do fatties this fat find dresses? I'm just barely north of fitting into normal brand and this girl is easily 2 of me. Is it all just custom/made to measure replicas at that size?

>> No.9881539
File: 880 KB, 1920x2560, 71E70136-0E63-431F-82F6-FB3244BB00F4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9881539

>>9881513
She has reached god level of autism. Screenshots of her admiting she shits and pisses herself.

>> No.9881542

>>9881539
God I feel bad for her. This isn't even funny, it's just sad.

>> No.9881543

>>9881515
This
>>9881487
Is a bodyline jsk.


https://www.bodylinetokyo.co.jp/products/detail.php?product_id=25058

>> No.9881544

>>9881515
That JSK specifically is from Bodyline, it's actually quite nice in terms of quality. I'd advise against replicas, otherwise shirred pieces and custom sized pieces are the best way to go.

>> No.9881547

>>9881513
>>9881539
>>9881542
I’m sorry

>> No.9881554

>>9881547
I also would like to ask that you don’t use this “BMT” abbreviation, it’s ugly and embarrassing, and it makes me feel like I’m worthless to you, of even a name.
Just call me Bella, it’s so much nicer, and it’s actually my name.
Thanks

>> No.9881567

>>9881554
I don't think most people will do this, Bella. Part of the reason we use acronyms is because of the board's rules. But I can see why you'd want people to get your name right if they're going to be posting about you anyway. Still, remember to not feed the trolls! You've been doing pretty well recently at not making a fool of yourself publicly. Your post here is a slip-up, but that's ok as long as you go back to not posting obviously after this.

>>9881539
Now that's just uncalled for. We were laughing at Claire being an ass publicly over some advice she received, there's no need to dredge up old drama. Especially old drama that's this unfunny.

>> No.9881590

>>9881509
>terrible bodice
>wrinkled
>shitty bangs on wig
>normie ass plain leggings
>shoes are too big

regardless of where the dress is from this still looks like shit. she could be fat, skinny or average, whatever it’s still a bad coord

>> No.9881591

>>9881590
I never said it wasn't bad, it's just not amazon like you said.

>> No.9881597

>>9881554
Fuck off, BMT.

>> No.9881612

>>9880237
This is an almost exact copy of one of the street snaps. Not wearing brand doesn't make it ita, git gud newfags

>> No.9881621

>>9881612
jsut because it was a street snap doesn't mean it's not ita either. this is pretty fucking ita

>> No.9881623

>>9881612
>saying "one of the street snaps"
ok newfag

>> No.9881626

>>9881183
It's a normie "fashion tip for plus size ladies" that refuses to die despite making fatties look like sausages spilling out of their casings. Same with "black is slimming!" and "don't wear stripes!" none of that shit is gonna make you look like you're not 50 lbs overweight so just wear what fits properly until you can lose the fucking weight instead.

t. am a fatty

>> No.9881629

>>9881612
Bitch, it’s ugly therefore it’s ita

>> No.9881630

>>9881621
>>9881623
>what is oldschool punk
whatever you say, newfags

>> No.9881632

>>9881590
You sound like the anon that got all butt twisted because someone pointed out the OPs shoes where not tights over heels. Aka you lack reading comprehension.

>> No.9881636

>>9879299
Echk. This was one of my dream dresses starting out. Seeing it worn like this hurts.

>> No.9881637

>>9881630
can you fucking read? i was referring to your shit terminology

>> No.9881640

>>9881637
nayrt but what is wrong with it? I an not a native English speaker but it sounds okay to me

>> No.9881642

>>9880662
IW has button-up straps, and they put in a few extra inches after the original button placement. Taller ladies like myself can just ajust the placement of the button for a non-invasive way to have it fit just right.

>> No.9881651

>>9881487
She is just fat, the coord is fine. Fit is not ideal but I've seen worse fit on thinner lolitas.

>>9880237
Surprised to see this here because it's a super cute coord. Did she do anything to induce vendetta?

>>9879289
Bitch, this is the best coord Holy Lantern have ever seen. Anon who posted this must be unimaginative af.

>> No.9881653

>>9881640
she should have said "a street snap" instead of "one of the street snaps." the latter makes it sound like she thinks there are only a few street snaps in existence

>> No.9881654

>>9881487
This is actually a beautiful coord. As a fatty myself, I would do a few things differently (different wig, and I would wear makeup and have more accessories). Vendetta?

There are people on this board who are violently against fatties. So much so that I wonder if they were traumatized by a fat person when they were children. Either that, or they're just trolls who are really dudes in their mother's basements, twice as fat and ugly as any ita on this thread.

>> No.9881659

>>9881469
Get rid of the wig (?) and this could pass as casual with a better bolero.

>> No.9881677

>>9881654
it would look awesome on a flatlay/floordinate, but it looks lumpy and awkward on her through the torso. something more structured would probably be better. she's got some really great poof though.

she really, really needs makeup. it makes the whole look appear unfinished and the way she has her head posed in the photo, she's more chins than face.

i think fat lolitas can look good, but this isn't it. she's got the right idea though.

>> No.9881680

>>9881469
This is a cute casual coord. What the hell is up with the bait, anon?

>> No.9881682

>>9881483
What makes this gross is all of the kink tags.

>> No.9881685

>>9881659
>>9881680
>when gulls out themselves as itas
That's not lolita by any extent of the imagination and nothing can salvage it except starting over from scratch.

>> No.9881689
File: 271 KB, 720x540, 1499779871197.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9881689

>>9881483
If these ddlg people can all go die in a fire that'll be really fucking nice. Somehow the fact it's tagged #kawaii annoys me even more than the lolita tags for some reason; there's nothing kawaii about your disgusting fetish, you absolute degenerates.

>> No.9881691

>>9881677
I think she has some makeup on but lighting and angle are really unflattering. I agree that fit could be better but it doesn't deserve ita thread.

>> No.9881715

>>9880237
This is p creative. Does she have insta/tumblr?

>>9881000
CoF is a closed group anon. That's exactly why I stopped posting my coords, I don't want my lolita pics to end up in hands of my coworkers.

>> No.9881731
File: 451 KB, 1920x2560, 382DE03F-0B69-4C43-A5FE-2C057E8A9A58.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9881731

>>9881567
Quit kissing ass. In the same convo she admits that she feeds the drama herself and uses her autism as a good reason for her shit behavior. Idk what thread you think you’re in, anon, but she admits she only does this to feed her prosecution complex and get points to her victim card

>> No.9881737

>>9881651
No one cares about who she is. She's wearing a flannel with Lolita and it looks stupid as fuck.

>> No.9881738

>>9881612
Please post the street snap so I may cringe and laugh at it also.

>> No.9881741

>>9881737
>>9881738
Nayrt but you sound salty anon. Flannel or not she looks cute. Chill.

>> No.9881748
File: 113 KB, 720x960, 32290124_10211789614005415_2770967961412829184_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9881748

>>9881741
sorry you have bad taste.

>> No.9881754

>>9881748
Nitpick. Tights are too heavy.

>> No.9881757

>>9881754
Nah I agree with anon on this one, it's a terrible coord.

>> No.9881759

>>9881757
Obviously it's not photoshoot-ready ott lolita but I think this would be nice casual wear with lighter tights. I don't really expect anything posted cof to be stellar, it's daily lolita coords.

>> No.9881761

>>9881759
Shit I meant everything* not anything.

>> No.9881763

>>9880742
your misunderstanding of the term robot isn't the only thing showing how insufferably new you are. just leave dude.

>> No.9881766

>>9881590
but it's not a bad coord. it's not pristine perfection but it's coorded well and the pieces are standard. the tights may be solid but at least they're textured to give more visual interest. all she needs is makeup and wristwear. this is very cute. take your bias out of here.

>> No.9881771

>>9881766
Plus solid tights were not a rare sight in oldschool. I think anon is just new. That dress is one of the most popular Bodyline pieces, easily recognizable and I don't even wear BL.

>> No.9881771,1 [INTERNAL] 

>>9881567
I've taken a long break like everyone asked, but i'm still getting so much hate, like this is just bullying at this stage. How can I redeem myself if so many in the worldwide community hates me? like I know i've done some shitty things in the past, and shared WAY too personal information, but i've taken time to reflect on those behaviours, and would like everyone to just leave it as it is, and stop bringing everything back up.

>> No.9881786

>>9880237
Flannel is a type og fabric anon. Tartan/plaid is the pattern and commonly used in punk. The material can be anything.

>> No.9881903

I've taken a long break like everyone asked, but i'm still getting so much hate, I mean this is just bullying at this stage.
I know i've done some shitty things in the past, and shared WAY too personal information, but i've taken time to reflect on those behaviours, like I was asked to, and I would very much like to move past it, and for everyone to just leave it as it is, and stop bringing everything back up. What’s done is done, and I can’t go back and I do everything, I’ve done what you asked me to, and I don’t know what else I can do.
In the end, we all know it’s my fault that I said all those things, I shouldn’t have used my autism to play victim, I’m sorry for hurting everyone’s feelings, but just leave what’s in the past, in the past.

>> No.9881926

>>9881903
Just shut the fuck up, you idiot.

>> No.9881931
File: 24 KB, 320x320, 1476622224715.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9881931

>>9881903
No one is going to move past it if you keep bringing it up. And yes, this is your doing. No one would have talked about you in this thread unless you posted this >>9880934
You're the one fueling the fire by constantly outing yourself here. Stop it.

>> No.9881937

>>9881903
Personally, I'm not going to post about you any more. But I hope you realise how even this post kinda makes things worse. Please Bella, just stay off cgl. Don't even read it. Just lurk in your local community's fb page, maybe go to a meetup in a few months and meet lolitas irl who can get to know you as a person. Also, maybe delete a lot of people off your private Facebook since some are apparently just there to laugh at you. I genuinely wish you the best, but you really need to cut out toxic people and resist the temptation to engage with the drama if you want to move past this.

>> No.9881938

>>9881903
“I know people talk about me, I knooooow”

>> No.9881960

>>9881903
Bruh, just stop. I promise you that if you just stop posting, you'll stop being a topic. If you've truly changed then shutting up should be a piece of cake.

>> No.9881963

>>9881931
I’m not bringing it up, you are.
>>9881937
I don’t know how I’m making things worse, if it’s not me bringing up past drama.

Fuck this. I QUIT.

>> No.9881964

>>9881630
>calling that thing oldschool punk
I'm offended

>> No.9881965

>>9881766
>>9881771
Please don’t try justifying this mess as “old school”. It’s bad now move along.

>> No.9881972

>>9881963
Please don't quit lolita. But if it's cgl you're quitting then good job, proud of you.

>> No.9881977
File: 862 KB, 500x281, IQUIT.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9881977

>>9881963

>> No.9881983

This entire thread is a disaster.

>> No.9881984

>>9880942
Fuuuuuuck I just watched her videos for the first time and I’ll want to do is shove some fucking valium down her throat.

>> No.9881990

>>9881983
Aren't they always?

>> No.9882023

>>9881983
And its almost dead so post some more itas or something

>> No.9882040
File: 423 KB, 2048x2128, 988EEFFD-03CA-4C01-9A2E-40FC05A2838A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9882040

>>9881963
Please quit lolita, you are a terrible woman child with no reason to act the way you do.

To keep this thread alive, here’s a ita.

>> No.9882041
File: 83 KB, 720x960, 32508366_10213983202885827_6725892251228045312_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9882041

>>9881964
>>9881965
>being this mad
Accept you failed and post some real itas.

>> No.9882044

>>9882041
This is pretty cute though? And i dont even wear sweet.

>> No.9882047

>>9882041
Just what the hell is up with the way she is standing?

>> No.9882054

>>9882044
Those piercings are fugly though.

>> No.9882061

>>9881984
Link to videos?

>> No.9882062

>>9882041
This coord is fine aside from the nasty piercings. Vendetta?

>> No.9882069

>>9882062
Nayrt but how is this lolita?

>> No.9882269

>>9881731
Oh please tell me you have more caps. This is goldmine

>> No.9882307

>>9881963
good, sell your lolita to someone who could coordinate it properly

>> No.9882330

>>9880693
Cosplay is con wear. Lolita is daily wear. They have nothing to do with each other. This idea may be too far-fetched for conlitas though.

>> No.9882348
File: 734 KB, 1440x1688, Screenshot_20180515-163823.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9882348

Please tell me this LizLisa dress isn't supposed to be worn this way. Ironically, no kink tags.

>> No.9882422
File: 154 KB, 620x372, witch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9882422

>>9881963

>> No.9882545
File: 355 KB, 245x170, 0B4923AF-D1CD-44B3-8DFA-FC73C93FABDE.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9882545

>>9881963
Bye

>> No.9882807

>>9882348
The designers likely didn't plan for astounding boobage. Either way, this is poorly planned for body shape, but fine.

>> No.9885554

>>9879623
after losing weight a lot of girls have deeper labial fold lines around their mouth but their lips end up pretty nice and plump

>> No.9885559

>>9881731
people will go to great lengths to validate themselves

>> No.9885560

>>9882807
>astounding boobage
dude those are like c cups at most