/fa/ - Fashion

christ no

I think so, but will probably get flamed by some autist who thinks otherwise. The shape is just perfect.

>>11556265
What about story et fall?

>>11556279
>christ no
then what?

>>11556265
????????????????????

>>11556286
story et fall is a cheap alternative to a slp silhouette

>>11556265
I wouldn't say the quality is necessarily better than other boots at/near its price point

but if you want a sharp thin silhouette then yeah slp is best for that

however I feel this is more of a niche thing better suited to very skinny people

>>11556291
crockett and jones, rm williams, churchs

basically just any mid-high tier dress shoe brand will be substantially better for the money

slp is all hype and consumerism

Question for someone who knows nothing about chelseas: they use elastic, yeah? Wouldn't that wear out and leave you with a looser fit over time?

>>11556282
BRO YOU CAN GET A CUSTOM SHOE MADE JUST FOR YOU FOR $400 WHY PAY A GRAND FOR EDDIE SLIMMAYNES

>no one has posted ever posted a shoe matching the shape

>>11556309
Only if you wear them everyday have a decent rotation going and they'll last a while.

>>11556310
just admit that you're buying them for the brand name and move on

>>11556265
>1k
0/10

>>11556315
That shape is perfect though Iro and SeF are the only ones who come close.

>>11556306
>consumerism
Christ, can we end this phrase on a fashion board? Not everyone wants to thrift everything they own or barter with a cobbler in exchange for four chickens, a vat of pickled herring, and a silver dagger.

>>11556301
Cheap price-wise, quality-wise, or both?

>>11556322
Pricewise its pretty damn cheap my pair has held up damn well for what I payed for them.

>>11556321
>he doesn't haggle with fishmongers on a daily basis

how pleb can you get?

>>11556309
The point is for the elastic to go somewhat loose, when you buy the boots it's alittle hard to expand.

>>11556330
>>11556313
Gotcha. Thx.

>>11556315
Yeah, I just love taking them off and looking at that golden lettering on the bottom, gets me so hard. Show me a boot with the same silhouette and I'll buy both of us a pair.

>>11556265
if you like the SLP styles then yes SLP boots are the best but please dont buy chelsea boots from them. Spend that $1k on their wyatts, santiags, duckies, french boots etc and dress with a bit of personality.

if you just want plain boots that look like SLP look at IRO or Sandro and save your money.

>>11556265

Crockett & Jones

>>11556286
No. I've heard from multiple people that SEF boots start to lose their shape after a while. If you really need SLP esque boots go get them off Reon District. I've had retail SLP Wyatts in both brown suede harness style and black leather Chelsea and can say that theirs are almost 1:1 in terms of the real thing.

>>11556348
>>11556319
look through the alternatives offered in this thread, then try posting again

>>11556400
But I posted alternatives I even own a pair of SeF Chelseas.

>>11556361
The chelsea boots are the Wyatt models minus the harness and zipper and some elastic throw on

>>11556394
Went to the reondistrict. Don't get it. They make bootleg designer clothes or resell them for lower prices?

>>11556400
Those alternatives get posted a thousand times, nothing compares to SLP and nothing comes close. SEF is shit, Iro might have a nice shape but it's not comparable to SLP. Show me the SAME silhouette for cheaper and try again.

>>11556310
please show me whatever readily available store/website will make the equivalent of a saint laurent boot for $400.

>>11556265
can these be re-soled when the time comes?

>>11556427
>>11556348
stop acting like slp is the end all be all of footwear, when it very clearly isnt

if you honestly can't find a chelsea boot you like better than hedi's then you need to look harder

>>11556426
Bootleg but they use pretty much the same, if not the exact same, materials that SLP uses. Same shape too. Really nice imo. Actually got rid of my retail SLPs and kept my RD ones instead.

>>11556384
I'm a big fan of proper goodyear welted shoes, but honestly the C&J derby 3 looks terrible compared to the SLP wyatt, especially the wyatt 40 shape which is just gorgeous

>>11556449
if its so easy to find then post then post a picture of one

inb4 you dont deliver

MONK BOOT

>>11556598
ew

M O N K B O O T

1. Maison Margiela side zip boots
2. SLP
3. Common Projects
4. Church's

Honestly if I was going to spend the money on SLP I would get some Wyatt Harness boots

>>11556616
holy fuck that leg opening

w2c?

>>11556616
>>11556598
stupid as fuck. monks in all shapes and forms should die

>>11556642
zara

>>11556598
>>11556616
>>11556672
is this a dream come true? i hope the quality holds up, not sure about zara

>>11556286
leather quality is actually comparable 2bh

the slp's have a slick silhouette but the leather isn't actually that great

>>11556671
(you)

>>11556632
nasty heel and looks bulky

>>11556714
nah they look slim on foot and the toe shape is comparable. if you're not going to get the 1.6 inch heel on the SLP boots you might as well get the common projects chelsea's in my opinion.

Fake BV chelseas are the best. At about $100 bucks, they're nearly a perfect rep. I know people are going to bash me or disapprove, but it's true.

>>11556734
BVs are shit and bulky as fuck. People only like them because Kanye wore them once or twice

>>11556684
they'll last you a year for like $100 I'd say it's pretty worth I would cop tbq

Thoughts?

THE UNUQLO MA-1 BOMBER IS BACK PLEBS

not sure if i still like bombers seems a little 2015ey but heres a link anyway

do you guys think the quality on these will be shit? i would think most of the asos brand ones under 75 would be shit quality but im paying over 100 and its supposedly a different brand so idk

http://us.asos.com/Bellfield-Leather-Chelsea-Boots/17ai3a/?iid=5757862&clr=Black&SearchQuery=chelsea+boots&pgesize=36&pge=1&totalstyles=396&gridsize=3&gridrow=5&gridcolumn=3&mporgp=L2JlbGxmaWVsZC9iZWxsZmllbGQtbGVhdGhlci1jaGVsc2VhLWJvb3RzL3Byb2Qv

I hope you're all women and not men discussing a woman's shoe.

>>11556306
>crockett and jones
not as sleek by a big margin
>rm williams
good suggestion
>churchs
Prada owns Church since a few years and their quality became shit
>basically just any mid-high tier dress shoe brand will be substantially better for the money
nope.
American/English dress shoe makers like their goodyearwelting and clunky lasts, so will be a far cry from SLP's styling
>slp is all hype and consumerism
so are Chelseas.
they have an elastic part which will not last, so quality leather that will age well and resole-ability are for naught.

>>11557473

>>11557488
>gender roles in clothing
>2016
don't worry I will turn in my man card and beard right away clearly I'm not manly enough

>>11557501
Since when? I've a pair of churchs and they look fine to me.. How can I now if they are pre or post prada? Or at least how can I say if they are or aren't good quality?

>>11556598
>>11556616
Wow these actually look nice, especially for 100 bucks? Anybody with a little experience handled them? ( if you've never handled an actual quality Chelsea don't bother to answer)

>>11557542
I'm fucking wearing them mate
>>11557473
quality seems decent, although the leather on the inside seems poor, but the suede seems gud and the straps are nice

>>11557587
w2c overcoat

>>11557602
allsaints Alba Coat
there's a sale on rn, i regret not waiting for this sale desu

>>11557538
Prada bought Church's in 1999.
Prices increased and cost-cutting was implemented like using bookbinder leather. just check out styleforum for specific models.

basically you get an entry-level Northampton dress shoe for the price of a medium-premium one.
plus Prada is abusing the Church's name for some fashion-only shoes.

>>11557611
It seems like the actual complaint are more on the fact that they are producing more fashion-y shoes that on the quality of the actual shoes

Mine are fine anyway, it's castoro suede with a good quality dainite sole so whatever

>>11557611
i think church's just fucked up quality control
shoes are still of the same quality just a couple of unlucky people ended up with shit batch and took to the internet to complain about it

>>11557660
>It seems like the actual complaint are more on the fact that they are producing more fashion-y shoes that on the quality of the actual shoes
you fail at google
>Mine are fine anyway, it's castoro suede with a good quality dainite sole so whatever
there are basically no visible quality differences between suede leathers. won't really get a patina either.
dainite sole is nothing special and found at entry level, too.

>>11557709
nope, whole series had bookbinder leather and with their new prices they just aren't competitive anymore when it comes to quality: C&J benchgrade is always better.

>>11557716
Can you prove any of that? Because really, all I see when Googling is people telling me to stay away from dress shoes with camo soles or 700$ boots made from corrected grain, DUH?!

>>11557748
using inferior bookbinder leather isn't some QC issue, which you find out after you produced the shoe. it must have been planned.

>>11557771
Not that qc control you are answering to

I was just saying that while they do have some shitty model and they did raise the price, that there are still models that. Are better than c&j qualitywise

>>11557587
Good fit for a spring/autumn-ish season
I'll probably cop when they'll be on sale, 100 isn't worth for zara, never had a pair of chelseas

>>11557786
read
https://www.reddit.com/r/goodyearwelt/comments/1xtq2f/in_defense_of_churchs/

>>11557501
rm williams are a good suggestion, but they have a very sturdy silhouette.
OP should check: http://www.finsbury-shoes.com/chaussures-homme-c6/modele-boots/
and
http://www.thomasbirdshoes.com/chelsea-boots

>>11557851
>rm williams are a good suggestion, but they have a very sturdy silhouette.
not true, they can be anything you want if you know how to order:
http://www.styleforum.net/t/21179/rm-williams-boots-everything-you-wanted-to-know

>>11557851
and carlos santos too.

>>11557858
could you post a pic of a RM Williams with the same silhouette from OP?

the silhouette isn't as good as the SLP wyatt 40, but the EG newmarket is still lovely, and far, far superior quality construction with much finer leather

Story et Fall are pretty good considering they cost a shade over 200 euros. Nice shape, welted, and good quality French leather. Decent alternative since SLPs cost four times as much and CPs twice as much.

>>11557865 http://www.rmwilliams.com.au/arno-bay/Arno_Bay.html?dwvar_Arno__Bay_color=02#start=1

Anyone got any recommendations for a tobacco color in suede? Most of these recommendations are dark brown or black or leather. Is SeF the best option for <$300?

>>11560038
>http://www.rmwilliams.com.au/arno-bay/Arno_Bay.html?dwvar_Arno__Bay_color=02#start=1

http://www.allaboutvision.com/visionsurgery/other.htm

>>11560183
Probably yeah.

>>11557488
m-m-muh manliness lol do you even read art of manlines REAL MAN can build REAL BOOTS which do not look like woman boots!!! also beard = man

>>11556265
what? are you insane?

>>11561578
those look nice

>>11556310
link a decent custom site

Are cheap chelseas(100-150 usd) shit quality? I like the look of chealseas but im not really in the position to dump so much money on a pair of boots right now.
Perhaps i could find some good used ones for that price?

>>11556632
>Zip boots
Ew

Anyone have these chelseas? http://representclothing.co.uk/collections/footwear/products/chelsea-boot-espresso

What's the quality and silhouette like?

>>11563456
the propotions of the shoe itself looks very awkward desu

>>11556265
RM Williams probably are, but SLP probably have the best shape.

>>11561853
>>11556436

You go to a skilled cobbler, no site is trustworthy. They need to make a last of your foot so the shoe is custom made JUST for your feet.

>>11563512
nice bespoke shoes start at like $1300

>>11563616
I know, I was just letting them know how it's done

>>11556455
unfortunately they never make size 12 in korea town

>>11556632
maison's sneakers are really nice but his boots aren't there yet. cp season 15 chelsea's were nice but the toebox was blunt and they still sold out quickly.

honestly sounds like op just wants us to pat him on the back and say congrats buy heedee chelseas lol.

>>11563456
that stitching on the sole is really bad i wouldn't buy it based on that. can't imagine the rest of it being ok if the stitch is that lazy

>>11563763
>maison's sneakers
>maison
>house
>thinking that's the name of the label

also
>honestly sounds like op just wants us to pat him on the back and say congrats buy heedee chelseas lol.
why the fuck would I make this thread if my mind was already made up

>>11563990
what do you have against maison, he's a good goy

>>11563990
seriously just buy the french style and fuck off.

where can i find similar boots for less than $50 im sorry for being a poor faggot

>>11564052
your local american apparel or h&m

r8 don't h8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4z62VrXAlM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ma7lyfYzIw8

>>11563763
>being this uncultured

>>11563763
>maison's sneakers are really nice but his boots aren't there yet

did you just learn about fashion 3 hours ago and if so what makes you so confident speaking about it

>Not wearing comfy AF blundatone

My grail.

>>11564534

>>11564074
Shit. Also, jeans looks cheap as fuck.

>>11557488
Fucking kill yourself

>>11564546
Too cheap

Spend 25 dollars on this Pull & Bear boots, I love them, theyre my second pair

>>11565348
>posting these in a chelsea boot thread
>anything from pull & bear

Famalam, I...

>>11565406
Famalamdingdong is dumb as fuck to spend a lot of money in clothes when youre a poorfag, stop the meme pls

>>11561434
>this butthurt
kek

>>11564739
i said don't h8!!!!

>>11565348
Wow, if you are poor - don't wear boots, at all. Or vuy some Clarks

More

Can I wear Chelsea's with nylon bomber? Or is it too much?

>>11556322
Quality is good, customer service is good, so if you do have any issues they should be resolved in your favor.

Price is like 400 I think, ordering is pretty weird though

I have these, theyre beautiful

>>11568811
Grill?

>>11569024
boi

>>11561578
absolutely disgusting silhuette

>>11569160
Why? Looks dope.

>>11569028
Post fit anon!

>>11569304

>>11570047
>>11569304

>>11570051
>elf core
just fuck my proportions up senpai

>>11570051
>>11570047
too pointy and awful leg opening
asos?

>>11570047
these are fucking terrible lmao

>>11557587
Can you wear these with something other than that style? Like, could those monk strap boots look good with a t shirt only, or pants with zippers at leg opening?

>>11556265
If ypu can afford SLP boota buy the FW13 Wyatts, literally the most beautiful piece of shoeware ive seen

If you only want black chelseas go for RM Williams, almost the same shape but cheaper, i have some Brantano ones that i use as beaters, i just had to resole them twice, or go get aomw custom made ones

>>11564052
Zara or H&M but theyre shit

>>11567361
What the hell are Clarks? Ill stick with my P&B, thank you very much

>>11565348
Are you lost or just retarded?

>>11570051
>>11570047
Nice robolegs, faggot

poor fag here, is there any black leather chealsea boot for around $100 that isnt garbage?

>>11571547
What's the point to buy boots if you are poor?

poeniehoofd kakjespak lolololo trolololo poke time nhaahwww

>>11571623

>>11571623
kanker op

>>11556321
I chuckled.

>>11570047
>>11570051

Boots for retired used-up hookers.

>>11571547
No, but you can get Loakes for under $200.

>>11564577
Nice one, wtc?