/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.15406470]

"No no no, you don't want a suit tailored slim. Trust me, they'll be going out of style soon. You want something more relaxed. It'll be timeless. Always in fashion."

[Anonymous No.15406660]

Timeless fashion doesn't exist.

Let's look at the decades 70s to 2010s. There is not a single piece of clothing you could have worn in each decade without looking like a retarded dork. Even suits changed drastically.

[Anonymous No.15406666]

>>15406660
denim jacket

eat my ass

[Anonymous No.15406668]

>>15406666
yeah, thats one

[Anonymous No.15406681]

>>15406470
COPE

[Anonymous No.15406821]

>>15406660
> Timeless fashion doesn't exist.
Well, then try to find a picture of Alain Delon from 60s-80s when a suit and a burberry trench coat which he wears aren’t fashionable. You can’t, fuck you.

[Anonymous No.15406833]

>>15406660
Levi’s 501
Converse
Turtlenecks
Nylon bombers
Band tees
Flannels
Tie dye
Milsurp

[Anonymous No.15407071]

>>15406833
Listing your own wardrobe doesn’t make it timeless lmfao

[Anonymous No.15407079]

>>15406833
i only own 2 out of the 8 things I mentioned but everything that I stated has been somewhat popular since the 70’s.
didn’t want to go for the obvious answers like button down shirts and chinos.

[Anonymous No.15407081]

>>15407071
Lmao this

[Anonymous No.15407086]

>>15406660
"Timeless" does not literally mean "this would perfectly fit into every conceivable point in human history". It just means that you could wear it over several decades without looking horribly out of place. A pair of basic khakis and a collared shirt is still just as relevant today as it was sixty years ago.

[Anonymous No.15407290]

>>15406470
This isn't bad advice. Unless you can regularly afford to get good quality suits, they're a horrible item to trend chase with. Ultra-slim suits are kind of trendy now (although they look like shit) but in a few years pants looking like they're about to burst at the seams from how closely they hug the legs aren't going to be cool.

If you trend chase you end up like those rubes in the 60s-70s who bought from Savile Row tailor Tommy Nutter. Those suits look like absolute shit. You could not wear one of them anywhere now without looking like a caricature.

A quality less trendy 70s suit might still have some hallmarks of the 70s like wider lapels, but it wouldn't have things that could turn the suit into a joke in 2020 like synthetic fabric or flared pants.

[Anonymous No.15407326]

>>15407290
>those pants

[Anonymous No.15407420]

>>15406660
Have you ever heard of Chanel?

[Anonymous No.15407426]

>>15406660
>boy youd look pretty silly wearing that baseball cap in medieval europe

[Anonymous No.15407431]

>>15406660

pea coats, if you aren't autistic

[Anonymous No.15407449]

>>15406470
true - slim/skinny suits are for the lookbook and just to cuck anyone who falls for the marketing. how the fuck can anyone function in one the entire day consistently is beyond me. maybe for a one night thing

idk about a relaxed suit because i think of baggy, regular is fine - either way i get the thinking where suits are timeless and you can probably wear one for decades to come no matter how fat and oddly you get since your suit is loose enough to hide your body. this is all considering if you spent $$$$ on a suit, if it's some mall shit or those mfa brands then yeah go nuts

[Anonymous No.15407461]

>>15407290
Those suits are based.

[Anonymous No.15407477]

Martin Greenfield is right. Unfortunately, most tailors I have gone to do not hew to this stereotype anymore and encourage you to go slim.

>>15406660
not only is this not true, it's not even true for suiting. You could wear a, say, well-tailored Madison cut Brooks Brothers two button suit at any point from 1950 to today and still not look out of place. Sack or darted or whatever. You'd still look good.

[Anonymous No.15407554]

>>15406470
It's true though, pretty obvious tell that someone just picked up a ready to wear suit or whatever designer product they saw online when they roll in with a shiny skinny suit with anemic little lapels and a gigantic collar gap

[Anonymous No.15407620]

>>15407290
>have enough money to go to the legendary Savile Row and get a bespoke suit
>go with a guy name Nutter who just opened shop last week
They deserved whatever they got, and what they got was JNCO

[Anonymous No.15407627]

>Martin learned the power behind clothing. He was beaten for accidentally ripping a Nazis shirt. After getting beaten by the Nazi he later had stolen the shirt that he had accidentally tore. Martin’s first tailoring session started with the shirt that he repaired. Once it was repaired he wore it under his uniform all throughout his time working at concentration camps. Wearing the shirt made him realize that clothes possess power, this became an inspiration to Martin and helped him survive the Holocaust.

[Anonymous No.15407712]

>>15407627
obviously that didn't happen and greenfield is a lying k-word but he is still a great tailor

[None !IGORsW/P/E No.15407715]

>>15407712
cringe niggler stfu

[Anonymous No.15407730]

>>15407627
what a filthy lying rat. Didn't happen, 150,000 of typhus

[Anonymous No.15407729]

>>15406660
these have been cool continuously since 1920

[Anonymous No.15407763]

>>15407290
70s suits looked so comfy.

[Anonymous No.15407772]

>>15407477

Even Brooks shifts detailing on their suits and sports jackets over time. A keen eye will pick it up. But to your point, I still wear coats I purchased from them almost 20 years ago.

[Anonymous No.15407853]

>>15407426
KEK

[Anonymous No.15408055]

>>15406833
>Nylon bombers
>Tie die
These are DEFINITELY not timeless, no matter how much you wish they were. Levi's 501 is tough to call timeless because the cut has changed over the years.

[Anonymous No.15408112]

>>15408055
>tough call
serious? theyve gotten slimmer AND every other brand does repros

[Anonymous No.15408194]

>>15407086
>pair of basic khakis and a collared shirt is still just as relevant today as it was sixty years ago
Yeah but the cut of the garments have varied drastically over the years

[Anonymous No.15408270]

>>15408194
I think the cut of a suit coat has seen some drastic changes, but overall there are many garments that have stayed pretty much the same

[Anonymous No.15408667]

>>15407554
the problem is old men like this have a very different idea of what "timeless" is to younger men. Older men will push what was popular in their heyday, and you will leave thinking you'll look like a snack and when you get the suit it's just a boring, office-appropriate cut

[Anonymous No.15408676]

>>15406470
my vietnamese old man tailor always does this. he's also a real big fan of having pants stack/sit on shoes. every time i tell him that i want the pants to sit higher on my leg he's always like, "i think it would look better if we didn't hem it as much but if that's what you want we can do it".
i'm going to be depressed as fuck if he ever retires/passes away. we got banh mis once at a vietnamese place that one of his kids owns.

[Anonymous No.15408678]

[Anonymous No.15408692]

>>15408678
Thats 2 horrible suits

[Anonymous No.15408695]

>>15408692
No, it's one horrible suit. The right

[Anonymous No.15408701]

>>15408667
who tries to look fuckable in a suit?

[Anonymous No.15409058]

>>15408695
Sure, try to get your suit to make you look like you're a Tom Ford model, that is definitely achievable and will not make you look like the formal version of the guy who owns a Drive scorpion jacket

[Anonymous No.15409106]

>>15406660
Jumper, collared shirt, dark trousers, plain leather belt, dress shoes. Done.

[Anonymous No.15409107]

>>15408678
Bait

[Anonymous No.15409221]

>>15409058
It won't. I don't know if you just don't own modern tailored suits but your suit should fit you like a glove (if you have the body for it.) The suit on the right looks like trash. Classic fit is classic shit

[Anonymous No.15409232]

>>15409107
Wearing the suit on the right goes like this:
"oh yeah, great suit. I love how it only kind of fits you."
"oh.... oh that's on purpose? Oh ... OK well cool."
(then pic related steps in)
"Damn that suit fits amazing! You must be really into fashion!"

[Anonymous No.15409291]

>>15409221
>your suit should fit you like a glove
It really shouldnt

[Anonymous No.15409302]

>>15409291
It really should. A tailored suit is made to your dimensions. It's not the 80s anymore grandpa

[Anonymous No.15409326]

>>15406666
Based. People can totally salvage clothing from any era in the past 70 years if you have any taste.

[Anonymous No.15409341]

>>15409302
>It's not the 80s anymore grandpa
>Posting on /fa/ that the drape cut is bad

lurk more

[Anonymous No.15409343]

>>15409341
In the end, it's always the s o y f a c e, the only thing NPCs can ever think of

[Anonymous No.15409351]

>>15409341
Oh yeah dressing like your high school principal is so sick. The drip is out of control

[Anonymous No.15409427]

>>15407420
The french Nazi collaborator?

[Anonymous No.15409431]

>>15408678
I don’t want a suit at all...it’s Pyjama tire

[Anonymous No.15409486]

>>15408270
If you look at the history of suits you will notice that the “relaxed” business suit was the fad, and not the other way around. In the last 200 years menswear has been relatively slim due to equestrian influence, but definitely the horrible wacky shit that >>15409232 is forcing.

[Anonymous No.15409487]

I want something like this

[Anonymous No.15409507]

>>15408678
grey suit looks better than that tom ford looking gay shit. Tom FOrd has to be the worst influence on mens fashion in the last 50 years.

[Anonymous No.15409512]

>>15409221
>should fit you like a glove

It's not a wetsuit buddy, it's a suit. LOL

[Anonymous No.15409514]

>>15409232
kek, this guy could get ass wearing anything but that suit fits terribly, and the shoes and socks...get a new stylist brother

[Anonymous No.15409519]

>>15409351

These are world leaders. There is a certain ideology here. They are trying to look decent and have more important things to focus on than clothing. Do you know how cringe it would be if they had well cut stylish suits?

[Anonymous No.15409562]

>>15409487
From the large buttons and baggy suit i would say mid 80s, I like it.

[Anonymous No.15409570]

>>15409487

based and redpilled

lightweight, unlined/structureless blazers are super comfy, easy to take off and carry about as well as their soft relaxed look being aesthetic AF.

also in summer you are cool and comfy while people who got memed into buying heavily padded italian suit jackets are dying of heat stroke

[Anonymous No.15409579]

Oh no no no
You drank coffee
We cant tailor to your big belly

[Anonymous No.15409582]

>>15407426

[Anonymous No.15409584]

>>15407290
Pretty fucking sick in all honestly I'd rather wear one of these suits to a formal event

[Anonymous No.15409693]

>>15409570
If anything italian suits are more casual than others. Look into spalla camacia and neapolitan jackets.

[Anonymous No.15409972]

>>15409570
>doesnt know what a summer suit is
>doesnt know 1 thing about italian tailoring
But sure go ahead and dress up like Tony Blundetto

[Anonymous No.15409988]

>>15408667
>younger men know what is timeless
>younger men know anything at all
Voting age should be 30 and restricted to land owners

[Anonymous No.15410026]

>>15406470
You shouldn't care whether it's fashionable to deliberately get your suit tailored so it's too small for you. Same for men wearing mascara, skinny jeans, or any other feminizing artificial trend.

[Anonymous No.15410030]

>>15408678
The guy who's supposed to look "better" looks like he can barely move his fucking arms and had to wear a corset underneath that shit. Fuck off

[Anonymous No.15410040]

>>15406666
Denim jackets have always been timelessly shit

[Anonymous No.15410091]

>>15406470
Considering nobody in fashion has actual taste in fashion, the only timeless fashion are the brand clothing that never or hardly changes. Adidas and Nike look the same decade to decade, you could put on a pair of 80's 70's 90's 00's 10's and nobody would be able to tell the difference. Everything else just looks like thrift store bought "im playing a college professor from the 40's for my school play" brown grey and beige blah that the internet jacks off to because most of the poors only have access to literal dead guy clothing at thrift stores.

[Anonymous No.15410096]

>>15410091
Teenaged hands typed this post

[Anonymous No.15410105]

>>15408678
wait i have to show a pic of left to get the suit on the right? thank you anon, been stressing over this

[Anonymous No.15410305]

>>15409972

the Tony Blundetto suit is basically the 56% amerimutt of 80s suits

if you look at Miami Vice all the versace jackets were linen and completely unlined because >Florida. At some point somewhere someone had the hellish idea of combining the big shoulders and heavy structure from silly 80s power suits with the tropical pastels popularised by Miami Vice

the resulting miscegenation is what Tony B wears when he leaves prison

[Anonymous No.15410489]

>>15409988
weak post, low energy

[Anonymous No.15410496]

>>15409514
It's better than the "timeless" look where you look like a 14 year old wearing his dad's suit to Homecoming. Suits should contour to your body, it's meant to enhance your shape not turn you into a sloppy Roblox character

>>15409512
If you think fits you like a glove means elastic tightness then you shouldn't be in a thread about tailoring homeboy

[Anonymous No.15410500]

>>15409486
"your suit should fit you well, not be sloppy and leave a bunch of folds"

Wow I really am pushing some "whacky" stuff!

[Anonymous No.15410503]

>>15410496
100% chance your inspo folder has anime characters in it

[Anonymous No.15410510]

itt someone defending their skinny, body fitted suit

truly some female shit

[Anonymous No.15410516]

>>15409519
It would absolutely be cringe. I'm not judging Obama for wearing this, it's appropriate since a president shouldn't be "fashionable" per se. It seems however people forget this is a fashion board. If you want to blend in and be instantly forgettable, go with the "appropriate for serious matters" look Obama has going on here. If you want to look, well, good, and not like a father picking up his son on the way home from the office, then get a slim silhouette.

Most people here have only ever worn suits to the homecoming dance and so they have no idea how a suit should fit you

[Anonymous No.15410519]

>>15410510
>t.

[Anonymous No.15410530]

>>15410503
Nope, none. But if that's all you got then I've clearly made my point.

If you want to stand out, look handsome, turn heads, and bring an impressive presence to the room, get a slim tailored suit.

If you like being invisible, ignorable, and having all the downsides of a suit with none of the sex appeal, then by all means where a suit that makes you look like a middle school girls basketball coach.

[Anonymous No.15410533]

>>15410510
Here's the "classic" cut he's defending in all it's glory. Go home grandpa

[Anonymous No.15410536]

>>15410516
REAL quick homeboy can i get your thoughts on this?

[Anonymous No.15410542]

>>15410536
Sure thing, on what specifically?

[Anonymous No.15410547]

>>15406470
why is he slurping up a noodle coming out of the wall

[Anonymous No.15410548]

>>15410533
>t.

also based

[Anonymous No.15410552]

>>15410542
Thanks, appreciate you just stating an opinion right off the bat instead of being a faggot.
here's your slim fit suit, it's from h&m and they make pretty stylish threadzzzz

[Anonymous No.15410558]

>>15410548
The pants are a smidge too tight but otherwise this blows classic cuts out the fucking water

[Anonymous No.15410560]

>>15410533
That's not a classic suit cut at all.

>>15410536
Why did he tuck his tie into his belt?

>>15410548
If he gains even 5 pounds those trousers are gonna explode at the waist.

[Anonymous No.15410561]

>>15410552
Was this meant for someone else?

[Anonymous No.15410566]

>>15410560
I'm being facetious to make fun of you. You think doughy classic cuts look better than slim cuts but they look like shit next to slim cuts every time.

[Anonymous No.15410567]

>>15410552
Not sure if this is a troll post but that HM suit looks 100x better than this lol
>>15409351
Only thing that H&M suit needs is to hem the leg and fix the shoulders, but the silhouette absolutely trumps classic.

[Anonymous No.15410574]

>>15410558
>The pants are a smidge too tight but otherwise this blows classic cuts out the fucking water

[Anonymous No.15410576]

>>15410105
Funny enough yes actually. Tailors are typically old and hate when young men want athletic silhouettes and will argue with them about "timeless" cuts and how "slim will go out of fashion" and you basically have to compromise just to get the shitty right side suit.

[Anonymous No.15410580]

>>15410030
Guy on the left looks bold, athletic, healthy, confident, powerful
Right looks like a used condom.
But sure, people will love that your suit fits you like a winter coat on a five year old. People will really appreciate your "classic" style and not immediately ignore you when left walks in the room

[Anonymous No.15410584]

>>15410574
>"I don't have an argument, because slim DOES objectively look better, bolder, and more sexy than the snooze-inducing sleeping bag cut that is classic. So here's a pic I edited I guess. Heh, timeless isn't a meme!"

[Anonymous No.15410588]

>>15410584
>my baseline thinking is an obvious photoshop is real and other than the pants, it's perfect

[Anonymous No.15410590]

How can anyone defend H&M, especially their fucking garbage ass wool/polyester blend suits?

[Anonymous No.15410600]

>>15410590
the suit quality is indeed crap, that's kind of their MO, but the cut and silhouette is leagues better than the shitty astronaut suits /fa/ defends because they see Ryan Gosling wearing one while smoking
>>15410588
Uhh sure, you got me anon. I mean I have no idea what you just said, but I bet it was epic. Don Draper would be proud

[Anonymous No.15410604]

>"Oh my god femanon, do you see you on the left? He's so hot in his classic cut suit, not that I know what the means. He's much better looks than the slim, healthy, muscular cut the guy on the right has. Oh yeah, nothing hotter than a man who's clothing hides his basic shape and gives him no ass!"

[Anonymous No.15410605]

>>15410600
>cant follow 3 posts
for someone who has a hard on for cuts you sure lack any critical thinking concerning proportions

[Anonymous No.15410610]

>>15410605
It's impossible to follow a conversation with you when all your posts are masked in six layers of irony and shit posting. So no anon I can't understand you. Do you have a handler I could speak to?

[Anonymous No.15410613]

>>15410610
>It's impossible to follow a conversation with you when all your posts are masked in six layers of irony and shit posting.

>>15410542

although too bad youre talking to 3 people and youre too much of a sped to realize that

[Anonymous No.15410620]

>>15410613
Are you implying that I didn't know you put a bald head or something? Or do you mean to tell me the warped photo you posted originally was a le epic pranks and not just a shitty screenshot? Cus if so I figured you just grabbed the first photo you could online, it's not like we're posting RAW camera shots here

Also I accuse you of being obtuse and the first thing you do is just repost what I said. Which proves my point pretty succinctly you aren't speaking clearly.

>although too bad youre talking to 3 people and youre too much of a sped to realize that
k? So I'm talking to three people, each speaking in riddles and shit posting, and I alone have the intelligence to actually argue my point. If I'm king of retards so be it, but post my crown next time

[Anonymous No.15410627]

>>15410620
O B S E S S E D

[Anonymous No.15410629]

>>15409507
Brooks Brother Black Label

[Anonymous No.15410636]

>>15410627
>obsessed
He said, responding and engaging in the very same conversation. This goes for you as much as me. Don't hate just because I'm correct and able to defend my opinion from kindergarten shitposts

Unless you're a 4th person, I can't be expected to keep track of you. You're all so easy to lose track of in your boring classic cut suits

[Anonymous No.15410646]

>>15410496
If you think classic fit means you look like a 14 year old wearing his dad's suit then you shouldn't be in a thread about tailoring, homeboy.

[Anonymous No.15410650]

>>15410636
>able to defend my opinion
>larps

>just a pinterst folder of suits
>>15410604

sure buddy, whatever makes you sleep

[Anonymous No.15410657]

>>15410530
I don't want people to think I stand out, I want people to think I'm outstanding. The suits you've posted call attention to themselves - they make themselves look good. I want a suit that makes me look good. I want people to think I'm well dressed, but not be certain why. Classic tailoring accomplishes this. This Tom Ford bullshit will be cringe in 5 minutes.

[Anonymous No.15410662]

>>15410646
That suit, the one you posted right there. Looks like a 14 year old wearing his dads suit to homecoming. Just because an old man in a B&W movie wears something doesn't make it look good. That shit drapes him like a blanket good god
>>15410650
LARPS how? What am I live action roleplaying?
>>15410657
>I don't want people to think I stand out, I want people to think I'm outstanding.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA holy shit what kind of reading rainbow shit is that?

"oh little Johhny that's so clever. I'm putting your nice quote right here on the fridge. You dad will love this! Maybe he'll let you borrow his suit again and you can call it "classic!"

[Anonymous No.15410669]

>>15410662
>an old man in a B&W movie wears something doesn't make it look good
Imagine thinking you have any authority to speak on men's fashion when you don't recognize the fucking Duke of Windsor.

You're a lost cause. Enjoy your embarrassing photos in 5 years.

[Anonymous No.15410673]

>>15410662
Savage burn, my guy. Way to go for the ad-hom. I'm gonna go apply some salve.

[Anonymous No.15410675]

>>15410662
>slim euro cuts made in sweatshop
>constantly brings up 14 year old boys in every response (pedo)
>thinks about how other women imagine him wearing a suit (sexually repressed)(thinking a suit === success === low self esteem)
>"Johhny", a generalized American name only Euros still hold onto

yikes

[Anonymous No.15410698]

depends where you wear a suit, but everyone should want this kind of fit outside work

[Anonymous No.15410715]

>>15408678
no break, slim lapels and slim tie on the right suit would best best

[Anonymous No.15410784]

>>15406470

Best look is no breaks with a little drape and always crease

[Anonymous No.15410805]

>>15406470
fa was invented in the 40s mate

[Anonymous No.15410822]

>>15410516
I actually agree with this opinion 100%.

In the U.S. political world, there is a degree of conservatism you have to keep. Notwithstanding this terrible photo, Brooks Brothers always made pretty solid suits for Obama, as they kept him sharp but understated. The fits were usually pretty solid as well.

I run in a lot of white collar circles, and I really don't get the vibe that there's any expectation of conservatism like that anymore outside of courtrooms and extremely formal boardroom meetings. Most C-suite folk I know are firmly a fan of polo shirts or just generic dress shirts unless they expect to be in important meetings. No-one gives a flying fuck about the cut of your suit unless it looks bad.

In other words, the "traditional" fit is coping for fat people.

(That said, dudes wearing overly-tight suits should also be subject to ridicule. It is uncomfortable to watch dudes in overly-tight suit pants, like >>15410574).

[Anonymous No.15410826]

>>15410600
The quality on H&M suits is so fucking bad that if you see one within a few feet of yourself you can immediately tell the fabric is shit and that it's a cheap suit without even FEELING it.

I wouldn't even wear a bespoke Gieves and Hawkes suit cut perfectly to my body if it were made of the material H&M uses. Cheap fabric looks and feels like shit and doesn't last well.

>>15410629
I thought Brooks Brothers discontinued that bizarre collaboration

[Anonymous No.15410842]

[Anonymous No.15410852]

>>15409058
NEGREDO NO DON'T DO IT

[Anonymous No.15410857]

>>15410822
>I run in a lot of white collar circles

I work in the high net worth individual practice at a large CPA firm, and it's always fun to see what our ultra-wealthy clients wear. We have one billionaire client and he looks like he shops at Kohl's. If you ran into him on the street you'd never guess what he's worth.

That's not to say none of our wealthy clients care about fashion. We do some family office type of bookkeeping work for some clients who don't have a family office, last time I looked at someone's she was spending $100k a year on clothes. Relative to how much money she receives in interest and dividends each year, it'd basically be the equivalent of me shopping exclusively at Goodwill.

[Anonymous No.15410858]

>>15406660
Blue jeans and a white t shirt

[Anonymous No.15410887]

>>15410784
>crease

[Anonymous No.15410895]

>>15409106
Fit of the trouser might change with time?

[Anonymous No.15410929]

>>15410857
Oh man, I actually went to an event in your industry, and you're 100% right. It shocked the hell out of me.

This little old lady came up to me and began rambling about how much she liked TJ Maxx. The firm was apparently managing like ~$600M for her.

That said, mad jelly of the $100k/yr. lady.

[Anonymous No.15410933]

>>15410519

Would skate in this.

[Anonymous No.15410935]

>>15406470

Definitely had a boomer working at an alterations shop say something to this effect before

[Anonymous No.15411015]

>>15410826
>I thought Brooks Brothers discontinued that bizarre collaboration

I think it’s more that Ford got a different job. I remember having a conversation with an old school sales guy in the Madison store. He thought Ford’s fitting were risible, but he did champion the suits and design. I think his quote was something to the effect that no one was forcing you to tailor the suits like an asshole.

That’s honestly the way I thought about Ford - good suits, styled ridiculously just for the runway but not real life - until the sperg on this thread.

[Anonymous No.15411044]

>>15411015
Wait, wasn't Thom Browne the one involved with Brooks Brothers Black Fleece?

[Anonymous No.15411065]

>>15411044
Oh shit. Haha. Don’t do drugs.

[Anonymous No.15411657]

>>15406833
cringe. you probably bought all of these items in the past 2 years

[Anonymous No.15411695]

>>15408678
Suit on the right looks objectively much better. No one in their right mind would do business with the try hard chad on the right. NOt a milion dollar deal

[Anonymous No.15411862]

>>15406470

The suits that man made for those two guys look good. Here is a picture of them.

[Anonymous No.15411865]

>>15408678

Is it so strange that I, as a thirty year old who lived through all of the late 2000s and 2010s slimmer suit fashion, prefer the suit on the right?

[Anonymous No.15413280]

>>15406470
very basaed

[Anonymous No.15413782]

>>15406470
>>15411862
It still looks well-tailored to me, and even on the slim side, but not "slim fit."

[Anonymous No.15414866]

>>15413280
I agree. I understand the appeal of something like slim Mod suits evocative of 1960s youth fashions, but I think the 2010s often took it to extremes in the fashion industry. At least, most suits and jackets worn by young businessmen still fit reasonably rather than skin tight.

[Anonymous No.15416035]

>>15408678
right looks still better

[Anonymous No.15416210]

>>15407290
Ultra slim has been the """trend""" for 20 years. Its not going anywhere

[Anonymous No.15416306]

>>15406660
Classic blue blazer. In style forever.

[Anonymous No.15416416]

>>15416210
As someone who was alive and old enough to remember 20 years ago, it definitely hasn't been in that long.

[Anonymous No.15417104]

>>15416210
>>15416416
Slim Fit became the norm when Mad Men premiered in 2007. Before that, it was pretty loose and casual in the late 90s/early 00s style still

[Anonymous No.15417106]

>>15416210
Ultra skinny suits occupied a place almost exclusively within high fashion designers and models during the mid-2000s, and that did not really exist yet during the early 2000s, when suits were fashionably worn loose by most standards now. There have always been guys wearing suits with narrow lapels, as opposed to moderate or wide ones, though, and those same suits may either be slim, moderate, or even loose, but rarely were pre-2000s suits ever very skinny, except for some in the 1960s and 1970s worn by fashion-conscious young men called Mods, Skinheads, and Suedeheads, and then later, some more elegantly dressed Punks, New Wave, and New Romantic boys and men that went for a more formal take on those styles.

[Anonymous No.15417141]

>>15406660
>rings

[Anonymous No.15417162]

>>15409232
straight hem looks like ass but tapered pants with dress shoes always look like clown shoes and also look like ass

[Anonymous No.15417173]

>>15406666