Art as an aphrotisiac

[Anonymous No.3668467]

>are artists only attracted to other artists

think about it, every time you heard a girl artist talk about some popular artist, she was literally drooling. Same with guys, only that guys don't discriminate between genders and can also act bi if they like a male artist.

just what is this fascination with skill and "uniqueness".. good artists are literally the alphas at the top of the food chain... at least in the art world that is

[Anonymous No.3668473]

No

[Anonymous No.3668477]

>>3668467
>are artists only attracted to other artists
ALL the female artfags I met could only be described as either autistic fujos or some breed of tumblrina. Some were nice for sure but I'd never want to get involved in a romantic relation with any of them.
That said I'm not really attracted to anyone anyways, so let's just see what other anons have to say.

[Anonymous No.3668482]

Girl here. I prefer the opposite, don't see why you'd get wet for other artists specifically. Sounds like something tweens at their dA phase would do.

[Anonymous No.3668487]

Unless we are speaking going gay, I wouldn't wanna date an artist. Female artists are even more autistic than male ones and we are pretty bad already.

[Anonymous No.3668489]

I detest other artists I know because most of them are radical leftists with no drive to improve.

[Anonymous No.3668494]

>>3668477
whats wrong with autistic fujos?
im a guy, btw.

[Anonymous No.3668496]

>>3668467
of course no. what a retard

[Anonymous No.3668502]

>>3668467
>girl artist talk about some popular artist, she was literally drooling
Females are attracted to anyone with lots of status symbols. It's literally all they care about no matter if artist or not
>does he have money?
>is he popular?
>did he travel a lot?
>etc
It's all they care about, cause they can't think for themselves, so they naturally flock to anything popular.

[Anonymous No.3668509]

art is gay

[Anonymous No.3668515]

Yeah I agree with other anon, I'm not interested in retarded leftist/progressive girls. Pretty much rules out all artists. Which is a shame. Because it is a skill that would lend itself well towards working at home while raising and homeschooling children.

[Anonymous No.3668534]

>>3668502
It's only natural anon, why would anybody risk a male with a small probability or ability to provide?
It's insanity

[Anonymous No.3668535]

>>3668534
why the fuck can't women provide? they're human too, right? isn't that why the got the right to vote? equality, hello?

[Anonymous No.3668536]

>>3668494
From what I've seen, a big thing in common is that they are physically repulsive: not pretty and don't know how to take care of themselves. I'm not a guy with big standards or anything but you know what we're talking about. They also are ngmi in all fields by virtue of lacking initiative and social skills.

[Anonymous No.3668539]

>>3668536
>social skills
i want to nuke the world just for this

[Anonymous No.3668545]

>>3668535
Because the appeal of powerful men is carnal and older than women's ability to provide. I'm explaining to you why nature is like it is. And even now, you will hardly provide when your pregnant, take an enormeous amount of time off work (probably get fired because your useless to your employers) and destroy your body making you weaker and weaker with each child. Men and women aren't the same anon, everybody deserves equal rights, but it doesn't mean everybody is the same. No matter what the feminists want you to believe

[Anonymous No.3668547]

>>3668515
>while raising and homeschooling children.
Kek

[Anonymous No.3668548]

>>3668502
>Women care only about status
I don't know why you all think that. Maybe it's I'm strange but I a lot of girls were attracted to me and I'm a weirdo with a bad haircut and look dead on my face. I guess I'm somewhat tall and have an above average face but my status whole life was being that weird creepy loner.

[Anonymous No.3668549]

>>3668515
>art while raising AND homeschooling kids
Boy are you in for a rude awakening

[Anonymous No.3668553]

>>3668515
Why are leftist seen as retarded? I honestly don't get the hate left gets.

[Anonymous No.3668556]

>>3668548
It's what they read online and think is the reason why their ugly/boring ass got rejected. Let them be, people who believe everything they read online shouldn't procreate anyway.

[Anonymous No.3668558]

>>3668515
Female here, I find it extremely difficult to balance work and family (two things I love) so my progress is stagnant. Another thing I find difficult is finding joy in it when art is work.

I chose family over art and I do art as a hobby not for money.

Do I drool over other artist, not really. I think I drool more over quality instruction, reference material and art material sales.

But that could be because I’m close to 30 with kids.

[Anonymous No.3668559]

>>3668502
>is popular
>travels a lot
Yh that totally isn't a recipe for cheating on you while your at home working your 9-5. What a catch

[Anonymous No.3668560]

>>3668553
Maybe the denying simple facts thing, like saying trans people have periods or there's no issue with black gun crime.

[Anonymous No.3668562]

>>3668553
Probably because of shit like this

https://youtu.be/dCxZBbqxGok

[Anonymous No.3668563]

>>3668558
Because the anon your replying to doesn't have kids and doesn't know how time consuming and difficult it actually is to have them at home 24/7. I never met a single decent artist who did both at the same time. They either stagnant like you or rely heavily on babysitting/kindergarten/school to get some work done.

[Anonymous No.3668564]

>>3668545
men aren't hunters anymore, everyone just goes to the supermarker for food and provisions.
you want powerful men? why, you're telling me that beating you is attractive? or that all women are gold diggers?
2 kids is the norm in most civilized countries and even then not all women choose to have children. honestly, i'm not sure how much time a woman needs off works, but let's say 2 years out of your life is not an "enormous amount".
ok ok, not everyone's the same, so are we going to let dogs vote next, too?

[Anonymous No.3668566]

>>3668562
>Video unavailable
>This video is not available.

[Anonymous No.3668568]

>>3668564
Did you even read my post? or do you think humans actually evolved past their carnal instincts? Doesn't matter if a man will provide the sheer prospect that he could is automatically attractive. It's a simple concept why are you failing to grasp it?
>i'm not sure how much time a woman needs off works, but let's say 2 years out of your life is not an "enormous amount".
Do you not know any women irl? In almost every country in the world women regularly get fired on maternity leave because nobody wants to keep paying somebody who isn't even working and won't be for 1-3 years and they can easily get pregnant again right after because most people want more than 1 kid. After that it's hard for most to find employment again. If your gonna have a family the man providing is almost a must for the large majority of families. It can be the other way around but there's no way to avoid maternity leave. You can read into Japan's issue with this, it's pretty hardcore over there

[Anonymous No.3668570]

>>3668560
But what you are doing is picking a part of the left you disagree with and think of it as the whole left. There are people on the left who think black gun crime is a problem that needs to looked at (Most leftist probably) and I haven't really heard about trans girls having periods. Maybe on tumblr but thinking tumblr 14-year old girls as the left is dumb

>>3668562
What does a trashy teen movie have to do with this?

[Anonymous No.3668571]

>>3668535
They can provide, in fact as a women. I could care less if I had a job or worked at home.

I liked having a job because it took weight off my husband to provide and pressure from me to maintain a clan and orderly home.

Being at home is more of a struggle for us, we’ve talked turns doing this and found that both of us a prone to depression if either of us were to be a home maker.

However my husband makes more money than I could (would take to long to climb up the ladder) so we agreed to this living arrangement. I care for the children. It isn’t easy, but he and I both have a responsibility. It doesn’t do anyone any good to bitch an complain.

[Anonymous No.3668573]

>>3668553
I really don't care much about politics and don't want to get involved in the MUH SJW VS INCELS debate but it's hard to not see how fucking retarded the vast majority of young leftists artists are, male or female.
You think I'm exaggerating but just go check an artschool (I'm in one) anywhere and you'll see how bad things really are when it comes to what people think of politics. I really believed Tumblr and Twitter kept to themselves and were a vocal minority, so I'm starting to question my sanity now that I get to hear ramblings about trans or gender nonsense, DRUMF, feminism, safespaces, anxiety and whatnot every day from fellow classmates.
>>3668564
>honestly, i'm not sure how much time a woman needs off works, but let's say 2 years out of your life is not an "enormous amount".
I don't think all you said is wrong really but you underestimate how enormous of an investment it is to raise a single child, especially when they still can't take care of themselves at all.

[Anonymous No.3668576]

>>3668563
I figured, and that’s about right.

[Anonymous No.3668577]

>>3668576
Have one as well, keep at it

[Anonymous No.3668579]

>>3668573
>MUH SJW VS INCELS debate
Whut?
>so I'm starting to question my sanity now that I get to hear ramblings about trans or gender nonsense, DRUMF, feminism, safespaces, anxiety and whatnot every day from fellow classmates.
I'm not going to comment about that since I'm not an art school and art schools have got an reputation for having weirdos in them but can you elaborate more on what they talk about? Trans and gender nonsense doesn't really say much.

[Anonymous No.3668582]

>>3668577
You too ;)

[Anonymous No.3668588]

Men should have leave too,
If it’s a hard or bad Delivery, it’s always nice to have help especially from the father.

[Anonymous No.3668589]

>>3668467
>Same with guys, only that guys don't discriminate between genders and can also act bi if they like a male artist.

you're gay and beta

[Anonymous No.3668590]

if every woman is so demanding, then i don't ever want a wife
hormones can go fuck themselves
literally

[Anonymous No.3668591]

>>3668553
well duh this site is overwhelmingly right, just in case you haven't noticed yet

[Anonymous No.3668592]

>>3668589
I’m female, it hard to move when the shot to numb the pain effects your ability to walk and you’ve never had to move around in a wheelchair.

[Anonymous No.3668593]

>>3668590
Yeah, no relationships are hard.

[Anonymous No.3668595]

>>3668592
what the fuck are you talking about

[Anonymous No.3668608]

>>3668579
>Whut?
Talk about politics on 4chan and people will be quick to label you a SJW if you're a leftie, or a dumb incel if you're right-leaning. I was just precision that I don't adhere to either of these extremes and don't want to dip my feet into this pointless debate.
>can you elaborate more on what they talk about? Trans and gender nonsense doesn't really say much.
They just adhere to this stereotypical left wing, liberal Tumblr mentality. They just keep going on and on displaying their superficial knowledge of politics (trump bad, feminism good, etc.), getting on their soapbox and generally trying to get to a moral high ground every occasion they get. Obsession with transgender and gender issues even though I've never seen a tranny on the campus, use of buzzwords I'd only have found on the aforementioned websites beforehand, one off mentions of rights not being equal for men and women,... They just keep shoehorning this shit at random in conversations, it's boring.
And I don't even think that's because the entire left wings of politics is retarded, at least in my country the left can still offer an appealing political program, it's more like because that's what's trendy on social medias these days, and i'd guess that's what they've been fed with for years.

[Anonymous No.3668616]

>>3668595
an epidural, it's the shot you get in your lower spine so you don't actually feel your pussy rip to your asshole/your belly get cut into and it can leave you hobbled if they fuck it up

they got a fuck up obviously

[Anonymous No.3668618]

>>3668608
>buzzwords
>toxic masculinity,
If that isn’t a trigger word for me.
It’s like women now a days have an inferiority complex.

In the words of Dabby form Dank and Dabby:
>”Shut your dick trap!”

[Anonymous No.3668619]

>>3668563
Maybe it's time to bring back the extended family in one home concept and dump the kids on grandma and grandpa.

[Anonymous No.3668622]

>>3668619
that just means you gotta take care of Grandma and Grandpa once the kids are teenagers.

Although I’m not totally against this idea.

[Anonymous No.3668624]

>>3668622
>you gotta take care of Grandma and Grandpa
aren't you going to do that regardless? or do americans hate their parents so much they let them rot in nursing homes?

[Anonymous No.3668626]

>This whole thread
why is /ic/ link next to /r9k/?
it belongs amongst /3/,/p/, and /gd/

[Anonymous No.3668629]

>>3668588
More and more countries allow maternity leave for fathers, in my 2nd world country everybody got some time off (even when it wasn't a hard labour) just cuz they got a kidnot long but a big help with the first few months. Priceless

[Anonymous No.3668634]

>>3668573
>so I'm starting to question my sanity now that I get to hear ramblings about trans or gender nonsense, DRUMF, feminism, safespaces, anxiety and whatnot every day from fellow classmates
I was walking my dog the other day and heard these two schoolgirls at the park talking mad shit about all the trans stuff and making everything into a bigger issue than it is. Considering I live in a very liberal country and they were young girls, I was surprised but it gives me hope. Our generation might be more obsessed with things that don't matter, like microaggressions and bathrooms, but the kids beneath us are seeing quite clearly how we don't have jobs and live with our parents until we're 30.

Zoomers might unironically save us all when they hit voting age.

[Anonymous No.3668636]

>>3668626
/ic/ is just /r9k/ with goals

[Anonymous No.3668640]

>>3668624
Depends on the relationship.

But I was thinking my grandmother who physically abused my mother and is just the most hateful women that know, and on top of that spits out media opinions. But I digress.

[Anonymous No.3668646]

>>3668629
That’s awesome, my husband (in America) got a little less than a week. But sometime is better than no time.

[Anonymous No.3668647]

>>3668629
It also depends on your employer in America. But hey it’s a great place to be, amirite?

[Anonymous No.3668657]

>>3668619
>>3668622
Because no1 not all grandparents are willing or able and it's liquid cancer. Can't build your own family with your own values when grandparents are constantly interfering. It's easier and better to just rely on school/kindergarten and hopefully have good enough jobs to live comfortably. Shit obviously gets more complicated if your trying to make it as an artist. Until your good enough to have steady income you have to rely on your spouse.

[Anonymous No.3668659]

>>3668534
>It's only natural anon
Natural for women, yes, cause they are dumb as fuck and superficial.

[Anonymous No.3668667]

>>3668646
Yh it would be great if he got a month but even a week when you come home is better than nothing.
>>3668647
I'm sure America will get there evetually too. Over here on the government payroll you don't get a lot (a week or two) but my husband works for a private firm who gave him a month and then another month when I got a bad case of pneumonia and was in the hospital for a long time.
Try aiming at private companies, especially with EU HQ's. They are usually very good towards their employees (Company in question is a programming one if it matters).

[Anonymous No.3668677]

>>3668659
>wanting best possible chances of survival for both you and your kids is dumb
And get this, most men are poor-decent side and they have wives and kids. I think it's time you start looking at your own faults instead of blaming the whole world
Based on your opinions alone you sound really dumb for example, low intellect in either gender is not an attractive quality

[Anonymous No.3668704]

>>3668467
>popular
well, there you go

[Anonymous No.3668711]

>>3668677
>most men are poor-decent side and they have wives and kids.
i don't get it, you're not disagreeing with him but call him dumb anyway?

[Anonymous No.3668718]

>>3668467
>popular
>drooling

[Anonymous No.3668746]

>>3668559
That's why whores like it. They're always looking to monkey branch to better options. You traveling helps with that.

[Anonymous No.3668755]

>>3668467
>implying women give a shit about anything they don't directly gain from
They don't give a shit about the "art" or even the guy making the art. They're attracted to the status and resources he provides. Being an artist is not relevant. The guy could be an athelete, singer, popular youtuber, whatever. You said it yourself:
>popular artist
Key word is popular. Introduce a girl artist to a male artist with no following and she won't give a shit about him. He'll be cute at most but that's it. If he's got a massive following and makes good money, all of a sudden she's interested and wants to get """lessons""" from him.

[Anonymous No.3668768]

>>3668467
I’m only going to date a really good artist

[Anonymous No.3668775]

>>3668553
>Why are leftist seen as retarded?

[Anonymous No.3668779]

>>3668677
Oh we have a white knight here. Mad at me for telling the truth huh?

[Anonymous No.3668786]

>>3668755
This. Women don't give the slightest shit about actually important things like character. All they care about is money, popularity, and shit like this.

They also should have never been able to vote, since they can't think for themselves, and just merely vote for what the media tells them to.

[Anonymous No.3668787]

i want someone i can connect with, i want to suffer together, i think id be on decent wavelengths with other artists

im not interested in chasing though so ill probably be single forever, and thats okay, less stress in the end, i get enough of that from drawing and working a dead end job with no foreseeable future

[Anonymous No.3668787,1]

>>3668755
Yes the reason Stacy doesn’t like you is that you’re not a popular artist.

[Anonymous No.3668906]

>not just coming out and grinding fundies with a hot boy late at night

why even bother

[Anonymous No.3670108]

>>3668477
are you saying that those three are artists?

[Anonymous No.3670109]

>>3668482
>girl here

oh anon..

[Anonymous No.3670117]

>>3668564
you want powerful men? why, you're telling me that beating you is attractive?

fuckin LMAO

[Anonymous No.3670119]

I would fuck sakimichan, even though she's just a moderately cute azin. Does that count?

[Anonymous No.3670121]

>>3668589
no, you're just an insecure low iq faggot

[Anonymous No.3670126]

>>3668755
>>3668786

you youngster neets have a really twisted image of women.. go out a bit

[Anonymous No.3670150]

>>3668467
as someone who shitposts onnaweb, it wouldn't really hurt to fugg a girl who also shitposts online. Same with drawing, it might have conversational value, but ultimately, i don't think this shit's the main thing that pulls people together.
dont ghet me wrong, i like freaky autismos, but they're also a pain in the ass to deal with because they tend to be complete children inside their heads.

[Anonymous No.3670174]

>>3670108
I don't know. They were certainly hired by based Feng Zhu to attract hot blooded youngsters to his school.

[Anonymous No.3670185]

i like cute boys

[Anonymous No.3670248]

>>3668536
The only really good art autist girl I've seen was actually really really pretty.
But then I've only seen one.

[Anonymous No.3670251]

This thread is why youre not making it

[Anonymous No.3670279]

>>3668467
I'm dating a pilot if that is any counter evidence

>>3668659
What is with this weird dislike for women? This is like a high school student's perception of girls. Are you guys just meeting the wrong people? Or not meeting anyone at all so you just presume? Does anime shape your life just as much as Steven Universe shapes theirs?

Some women identify with a vapid capitalist culture that values status over character, and while I'm not saying it's not their own fault for being superficial, ignorant faggots, nobody is asking more of them. Saying shit like >>3668786 only furthers the problem and you dig your own lonely neet graves. Also, ngmi

[Anonymous No.3670282]

>>3670279
Or if you do find someone who fits the description of women you've made for yourself, you're only destined for a life of emptiness. Hold higher standards for yourself, and a better woman will come along.

[Anonymous No.3670290]

>>3670279
it's the fear of sexual harassment that made us fear to even speak to women and the fact that women never initiate only adds insult to injury

[Anonymous No.3670300]

>>3670290
>fear of women
That's not a real excuse dude. If someone clearly doesn't understand how being a person works, just move on, regardless of how big their tits are. You say women don't care about character, I would argue that men also don't give a shit if they apparently think all women are shitty people who desire status alone and can't handle normal conversation without suing someone. Grow the fuck up.

[Anonymous No.3670312]

>>3670290
>Fear of sexual harassment
lol, why would you lack the confidence in yourself to think that any woman you come close to will label you a creep or a perv and file sexual harrasment charges on you.

[Anonymous No.3670317]

>>3670109
some other chick here

no. honestly I prefer being the creative dominate in the household. im not sharing control of house decor. Fellow artists annoy me becuse I need large areas of atmospheric control to work in that i dont share well. my so is awesome becuse as long as i dont touch his lapton , he dont give af about art/decor/culture in gen. hes just a lil nerd.

[Anonymous No.3670321]

>>3670290
fucking good. If you dont have enough contextual awareness to understand what is or isnt sexual harassment. you are absolutely what we are complaining about and are taking steps not to bother others.

[Anonymous No.3670359]

>>3670321

i.e. "read my mind and dont be unattractive, anon"

[Anonymous No.3670364]

>>3668489
Oh God this, they're not even interested in art as a career, they just wanna be good enough to draw their OCs.

[Anonymous No.3670368]

>>3670359
why is so common for women to expect that one somehow guesses what they're thinking? men just say it as it is

[Anonymous No.3670369]

>>3668553
Well for me it's because I don't care about politics at all but for lefties their whole life revolves around being constantly on watch for anything they find personally offensive. It's absolutely exhausting being with someone like that, for the same reason you wouldn't want to hang out with someone who's life revolves around white power or whatever.

[Anonymous No.3670373]

>>3670369
I want to add this is a largely American phenomenon, after traveling I've come to hate the US and I really want to leave here, the bipartisan brainwashing here is absolutely insane, it's like they're not even human anymore.

[Anonymous No.3670379]

>women only care about money and popularity!
>m-me caring only about their tits and labeling them all stupid, gold-diggers is totally different!
Why is this thread even alive for so long? Everybody back to drawing

[Anonymous No.3672244]

4chan didn't use to be a safespace circlejerk for edgy virgins and unfuckable faggots tbphwyf.

There is so much cringey self-justification for why anons choose to be internet-addicted doingusses.

And then all the retarded 17 year old politiks bullshit ITT. Like you're going to art school and obsessing about "leftists" and all these other strawman memes? Fucking art schools are full of flakes and weirdos and people with all kinds of personality and mood disorders and shit. It's like what're you just setting out to be an unappealing autistic faggot that nobody likes?

Like why do you choose to anonymously act like a virginal loser? Why not just "pretend" to be someone that is cool and not weirdly-prejudiced and obsessed about your faggy identity politics? Fake it til you make it. How you gonna stop being a virginal faggot if you only ever act like a virginal faggot?

It isn't cool to be an edgy bitch ass baby that whines about everything. It'll never be cool. You'll just always be a hysterical reactionary do-nothing until you eventually die. Obsessing about what other people do and using their existence to justify why you choose to be a lazy grumpy goomba is cancer. The existence of other assholes doesn't justify being an asshole.

[Anonymous No.3672245]

>>3672244
>having opinions on politics makes you a virginal loser

[Anonymous No.3672246]

>>3668467
remember when tablet threads were the worst thing about /ic/

[Anonymous No.3672254]

>>3672245
>going to art school and then obsessing about the political memes that a bunch of weirdos get into and using that to justify why you don't interact with them makes you a virginal loser
>telling yourself you wouldn't even want to date a artist gril even if you could so you never feel weird for never trying makes you a virginal loser
>self-censoring who you interact with and "detesting" them because you're a "rightist" tribalist makes you an unfuckable faggot
it's not about "having opinions on politics," it's about "being obsessed with political labeling fallacies and limiting life experience to avoid people you think are in a different political tribe than you." Don't go to art school if you get triggered by weirdos with a diversity of opinions.

And honestly it's probably just in most of you cucks' best interest to quit telling yourself you're some kind of conservative anyway. The whole left/right dichotomy is a lie anyway. It's just a means of social control. Outgroup contempt and monkey tribalism and shit. When you hop into a thread about "are artists attracted to other artists" and start cucking the place with with REEEE THERE'S LEFTISTS AT MUH ART SCHOOL and PFFT GIRL ARTISTS ARE LAME ANYWAY and all this shit, you are very clearly projecting the self-justification strategies you tell yourself every time you choose to continue not making an effort. All that shit is bad for your mental health in the long run. You're just letting other people control your life.

[Anonymous No.3672287]

>>3670290
If you constantly find yourself in situations being accused of sexual harassment maybe the fault is not in the opposite sex but maybe your poor social skills. Also don't seek a waifu from night clubs~

And if you are never being initiated ask yourself "have I made my best effort to have a decent appearance and hygiene" because women see hell of an effort to do their make up and choose their clothes etc. dumb chick shit before they head out, and they can pretty much decide during first 2sec glimpse of you if you have made any effort to look and smell good, and more importantly if you seem like a person who makes this effort every day. Also if you are overweight it's pretty tough luck

[Anonymous No.3672299]

>>3672244

>leftists are not a threat to art

[Anonymous No.3672308]

>>3668545
Shush, you're breaking their conditioning.
>>3668515
Only now, when my kids are teens, do I find proper time for art.

[Anonymous No.3672309]

>>3672299
nobody and nothing is a threat to "art." You let delusions of persecution tied to a bunch of nonsense messaging strategy being shoved down your throat by malignant agencies that want you to feel threatened so you keep sucking their dick. You let fear and anxiety and abstract panic effect your perception of basically every aspect of your reality most likely. And for what really? What are you really getting out of being a politikal tribalist other than a bunch of nonsense anxiety?

You being an uppity coward is the only actual "threat to art." And it's only a threat to your ability to produce art. Election is over you can stop being escared of spoopy boogiemen now.

[Anonymous No.3672319]

>>3672309

I'm not american dumbass. People are literally being deplatformed and subject to witch hunts, losing their jobs over single tweets etc. and you have the gall to say it is of no importance? You're a fucking moron.

[Anonymous No.3672329]

>>3672244
because being an internet tough guy is even more cringey

unlike you we're not posers, we don't pretend to be anyone. being anonymous means we can be honest. there's no benefit here in being a confident douchebag.

[Anonymous No.3672334]

>>3672319
>I'm not american dumbass.
doesn't really matter. You're consuming American and English language media content. You're still being bombarded by billions of dollars of subversive messaging strategy that's fundamentally designed to turn you into an hysterical reactionary cuck.
> People are literally being deplatformed and subject to witch hunts, losing their jobs over single tweets etc.
Yeah if you publicly act like a cunt you can be fired. People don't like it when their employees embarrass the company they work for.

And you agree to the TOS of a platform when you sign up. If you break the rules the corporations that own the platform can do whatever the fuck they want.

And lets not forget that you're acting like people have ever been allowed to act like ugly assholes on social media without the risk of repercussions. 15 years ago the platforms didn't even exist.

And it isn't like there isn't a fucking cult army of sjw-right faggots that will "witch hunt" and harass and stalk and create controversy against people they don't like. James Gunn got witch hunted hard as fuck by reactionary "conservatives" that destroyed his career and GotG 3 out of spite over fucking Roseanne calling a retired public servant a terrorist ape and getting shitcanned for it.
>and you have the gall to say it is of no importance?
Yeah it's pretty easy to not act like a belligerent asshole. It's pretty easy to not get deplatformed. And you shouldn't publicly say things if there's ever a chance that your employers would give a shit about it. This is how things have always been.

And like ISPs are taking control of the future of the internet. And platforms are knowingly working with and accepting business from malicious foreign agencies that microtarget propaganda designed to agitate and radicalize children against each other. That's way more important than "facing consequences for being a cunt."

[Anonymous No.3672357]

>>3672334

But that's wrong, you don't need to "act like a cunt" to lose your job. You just have to say ONE critical thing about any of the protected issues that the left has deemed to have monopoly on like #metoo, feminism and trans issues etc.. on your private facebook to get an outrage mob demanding you to get fired. Meanwhile calling for violence on "drummpff xD" supporters or posting pics of your asshole to a fellow artists you don't like on twitter is totally fine.

[Anonymous No.3672360]

>>3672319
>You're a fucking moron.
You're easily agitated by people that want you to self destruct. ngmi.
>>3672329
>because being an internet tough guy is even more cringey
no this shit is about as cringey as can be. And we're not even talking about being a "tough guy." Just NOT being a "reactionary faggot."
>unlike you we're not posers
You are though. You've all just been trained to rally behind nonsense labels like "incel" (CELIBACY IS VOLUNTARY YOU CAN'T BE INVOLUNTARILY CELIBATE YOU'RE JUST AN UNFUCKABLE FAGGOT) and then you all just start memeing and internalizing a bunch of self-defeating cancer ideologies that reinforce and encourage you to continually act like sniveling poindexter retards that let everything upset them.
>we don't pretend to be anyone
You do. You always do. You never don't.
> being anonymous means we can be honest.
It's not honesty though it's just circlejerking self-justification memes.
>there's no benefit here in being a confident douchebag.
Again this is a false dichotomy. There's an ocean of difference between being a "confident douchebag" and "not acting like a retarded buttblasted kid."

Before 2014 people on 4chan weren't constantly whining and seeking out reasons to be upset about trivial identity politics bullshit constantly. The benefit of being anonymous used to be that people could try out new jokes and memes and ideas without worrying about eating shit if it doesn't land. This idea that being anonymous means "being honest and sincere and using an imageboard for free therapy" is cancer.

The tone has changed from anons ironically mocking and goofing on stuff to anons having an extinction panic over everything. Now it's all these faggot kids that take everything fucking personally and get unironically upset about fucking everything and just whine and bitch about strawmen and all these abstract distractions that they feel inexplicably persecuted by. It's fucking stupid and boring and gay as fuck.

[Anonymous No.3672361]

>>3672357
Are you fucking retarded? If your employer deems your behavior is representing their company or product poorly, they have every right to terminate you. Conservatives love to espouse the great benefits of free market capitalism and corporate agency until their moronic beliefs are ostracized from the “marketplace of ideas.” Then they blame leftists for a choice that their employer made. Ngmi in art or life

[Anonymous No.3672362]

>>3668535
>tfw no rich sugarmommy to provide for me and my art hobbies

[Anonymous No.3672363]

>>3668467
>Think about it, every time you heard a girl artist talk about some popular artist, she was literally drooling. Same with guys, only that guys don't discriminate between genders and can also act bi if they like a male artist.

That's really interesting, op. Thought I was a bit weird for developing feelings of deep respect and a nebulous proto-love for some of my artfriends who do fantastic work. I'm female, but I don't actually notice their gender, just the person.

[Anonymous No.3672364]

>>3672361

Do you think it's fair and reasonable that a guy lost his job for posting an article that was critical of metoo (written by a feminist) on his private facebook wall? Yes/no?

[Anonymous No.3672370]

>>3672357
>But that's wrong, you don't need to "act like a cunt" to lose your job.
You pretty much do. Like I guess you are right that if a bunch of spam bots bombard Disney with James Gunn pedophile jokes you can get fired, but that was "your" side doing that.
>You just have to say ONE critical thing about any of the protected issues that the left has deemed to have monopoly on
No you pretty much have to call black public servants terrorist monkeys.
>like #metoo
somehow I imagine a politically radicalized "incel" type that spends a lot of time on 4chan unironically consuming propaganda, you probably have a pretty good chance of saying something that's "offensive" to "essentially everyone." Social media platforms aren't "leftist." Corporations aren't "leftist." When you act like an embarrassing tribalist shitposter you make your employers look bad, and since we don't have employee protections because we live in a corporatist society, they'll fire your ass.
>#metoo, feminism and trans issues etc..
and another thing: Why the fuck do you spend a lot of time giving an actual shit about trannies and feminists and shit? You realize you they can pretty easily be avoided right? And like do you have a depth of knowledge on homo shit and trannies or something? Why do you think those are subjects you need to be involved in?
>on your private facebook to get an outrage mob demanding you to get fired.
Again this isn't really new though. 20 years ago if you publicly spent a lot of time talking shit about trannies or rape victims or whatever you'd still be fired. Just because new media has made it easier to stick your foot in your mouth in writing doesn't mean anything has changed.
>Meanwhile calling for violence on "drummpff xD" supporters
no one is really doing that. You do have Fox News employees and the President advocating for political violence though and they're doing ok.
>or posting pics of your asshole to a fellow artists
this a personal experience thing?

[Anonymous No.3672374]

>>3672370
>>3672360
>>3672334
>>3672244
>>3672254
Brian, you are being a smartass and hungry for attention. If you are wondering why you're single, here's the big hint.

[Anonymous No.3672375]

>>3672364
Yes. Faggots who openly rally against basic civil protection should be weeded out of the workplace. Preferably murdered and dumped in a mass grave.

[Anonymous No.3672382]

>>3672364
>>3672370
>>3672370
>somehow I imagine a politically radicalized "incel" type that spends a lot of time on 4chan unironically consuming propaganda, you probably have a pretty good chance of saying something that's "offensive" to "essentially everyone." Social media platforms aren't "leftist." Corporations aren't "leftist." When you act like an embarrassing tribalist shitposter you make your employers look bad, and since we don't have employee protections because we live in a corporatist society, they'll fire your ass.

Nice strawman. "everyone who disagrees with feminist ideology is an autistic incel that doesnt get laid and advocates for trans people to be murdered xD"

The example I gave is a guy who literally just SHARED an article critical of metoo, written by a woman who calls herself a feminist. No spastic woman hating, no foul language, just a shared fucking post. Do you think it's fair to deem that so offensive that he should be sacked for it?

[Anonymous No.3672391]

>>3672382
People who disagree with progressive ideology in general are backwards morons who would likely be relegated to a lifetime subsistence farming in a timeline without the societal contribution of radical progressives. Conservatism is the ideology of fear and stunted intellectual and emotional growth. It’s not a left/right problem, it’s a backwards, selfish human problem.

[Anonymous No.3672392]

>>3672364
>Do you think it's fair
It's so weird how much "conservatives" have become obsessed with whataboutism and "fairness." Like the policies that rightists put into place are all about "fuck fairness." But then when it comes to some trivial bullshit about some strawman asshole that couldn't NOT talk shit on the internet suddenly ITS NOT FAIR ITS NOT FAIR REEEE.
>and reasonable that a guy lost his job for posting an article that was critical of metoo
You realize you're talking like a leftist right? The whole concept of things like "employee unions" and "tenure" are that you have "job security" and "it's really hard for your employer to fire you." If you want things to be more "fair and reasonable" when it comes to employer/employee rights, you're on the wrong side.

Things don't need to be "fair and reasonable" btw. Most things aren't.

And seriously, you're clinging to one availability heuristic strawman story about a few notable instances where you think someone wasn't treated in a "fair and reasonable" way by their employer after they got caught shitposting 2hard4ajob. One bozo isn't much of an actual trend. especially compared to all the ISP agency capture of government agencies that regulate our access to the internet, and the billions of dollars being spent by corporations and foreign governments to psychographically microtarget people with subversive messaging and propaganda and stuff. There are HUGE things going on and you're talking about some dickhead that shitposted too close to the sun and got in trouble.

>Yes/no?
Your quality of life is dropping and your cost of living is increasing. Corporations have seized total control over the agencies that are supposed to regulate them. We're past the point of no return for global warming and there's a looming global-economic catastrophe that may fundamentally change everything in our lifetimes. Is any of that fair and reasonable? Yes/no?

[Anonymous No.3672395]

>>3672392
>fairness
>things like "employee unions" and "tenure" are that you have "job security" and "it's really hard for your employer to fire you."
> "fair and reasonable" when it comes to employer/employee rights
All things that got pushed hard by Adolf Hitler.

[Anonymous No.3672396]

>>3672392
I think your issue is conflating right wing, libertarian, conservative and centrist when they just very loosely intersect. I wouldn't describe myself as conservative but very very right wing.

[Anonymous No.3672400]

>>3672392
>It's so weird how much "conservatives" have become obsessed with whataboutism and "fairness." Like the policies that rightists put into place are all about "fuck fairness." But then when it comes to some trivial bullshit about some strawman asshole that couldn't NOT talk shit on the internet suddenly ITS NOT FAIR ITS NOT FAIR REEEE.

Again he wasn't talking shit, he wasn't being autistic or even rude, he just sharing an article that provided a different perspective to the popular opinion. You're the one doing the whataboutism when you're refusing to adress the specific example I'm giving and instead throw a bunch of strawmen at me about incels and other nonsense.

[Anonymous No.3672401]

[Anonymous No.3672404]

I'm pretty much a perma-virgin thanks to art.
I'm pretty attractive, warm personality and all that but I never get to leave the house anymore. Making a living is too tough right now for socializing of any kind.

[Anonymous No.3672414]

>>3672374
im jimmy tho
>>3672382
>Nice strawman.
the only part of that that was a strawman was the first sentence, and that's just making assumptions about (you) based on A: the dang demographic of this site, and B: the things you care about.
>"everyone who disagrees with feminist ideology is an autistic incel that doesnt get laid and advocates for trans people to be murdered xD"
This is a straight up strawman fallacy. Do you do this shit unironically? Are you knowingly disingenuous or is it the only way you know how to think?

Like honestly why does all your hysterical strawman shit involve all this made up persecution and whatever? You're fundamentally incapable of having a rational, good faith conversation. You just reflexively jump to REEEE YOU WANT TO MURDER ME like a belligerent fucking faggot. Like why don't you feel embarrassed?

>The example I gave is a guy who literally just SHARED an article critical of metoo
Well A: idk who the fuck you're talking about. And B: Some dude getting shitcanned for SHARING some blog or whatever that is critical of rape victims isn't some fucking cultural crisis. If your employer thinks you're making them look bad they can fire you.

Like what exactly do you want? How do you fix this crisis of yours? Unions? An employee bill of rights? How do you resolve your dilemma when you hate "leftism?"
>No spastic woman hating, no foul language, just a shared fucking post.
NO JUSTICE NO PEACE! UNIONIZE NOW!
>Do you think it's fair to deem that so offensive that he should be sacked for it?
AGAIN: fairness isn't an actual metric of anything. You're talking about corporate TOS and employer standards and contract law and stuff.

Seriously stop obsessing about this "fairness" meme. You sound like a fucking 5 year old communist with that shit.

You are going to die. Humanity is eventually going to go extinct. There is no afterlife. Existence is fundamentally without intrinsic meaning. none of it is "fair."

[Anonymous No.3672416]

>There is no afterlife. Existence is fundamentally without intrinsic meaning.

How do you know?

[Anonymous No.3672422]

>>3672396
>I think your issue is conflating right wing, libertarian, conservative and centrist when they just very loosely intersect.
I used to sell Libertarianism for a Koch superpac in 2009 when they were trying to keep people agitated against reforming the health insurance industry. I think the issue is less about "conflating" and more about how fluid and meaningless all of those things have become. People on "the right" under W where all neocons that were constantly defending exploding defense bureaucracy and terror war and stuff. Then Obummer gets elected (and Citizens United happens) and suddenly all those neocons are fucking Libertarians that think ALL gubment is violence. Then Trump gets elected and now it's HUZZAH WE'VE NEVER HAD A BIGGER DEFENSE BUDGET!

There's very little meaningful ideological continuity on the "right" anymore tbphwyf. It's all just marketing.

>I wouldn't describe myself as conservative but very very right wing.
yeah it doesn't matter what memelabel you self-identify as, you're just a cuck for corporations that abuse and manipulate you using the media you consume.
>>3672400
nigger I don't know who you're talking about. And it doesn't fucking matter. IF YOU WANT MORE EMPLOYEE PROTECTIONS FROM BEING "UNFAIRLY" FIRED YOU'RE A SECRET LEFTIST.
>You're the one doing the whataboutism when you're refusing to adress the specific example I'm giving
You didn't give a specific example. You said some vague anecdote. idk who you're talking about. They might have been a cunt and that was the last straw. It may be entirely made up! How would I know?

[Anonymous No.3672427]

>>3672416
>How do you know?
I'm not a child? When you die you die. I don't care about a bunch of made up caveman afterlife lore that was always just designed to keep people compliant.

And I mean sheeit I do believe that the existential afterlife is either creating people or things that manage to make it as long as possible after you die, but there's no reason other than desperate hope to assume that your soul/mind ever leaves your brain.

I also like the idea that as you die your brain goes into a "death mode" that changes your perception of time and creates an "afterlife" that may feel like forever in the time it takes for your brain to start rotting. That's why I probably wouldn't shoot myself in the head. That probably just turns the lights out. I want that slow brain death experience desu
>Existence is fundamentally without intrinsic meaning.
I mean it is. But we create the rocks we push up the hill. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_Sisyphus

[Anonymous No.3672441]

>>3672427
>I'm not a child? When you die you die. I don't care about a bunch of made up caveman afterlife lore that was always just designed to keep people compliant.

Well you're wrong, the body is already an advanced radio/electrical piece of equipment and everything the body has doubles as an antenna of conductive/captivate material of some sort. Even all the chemical processes have an underlying electrical mode they operate on.
What I'm getting at is that when you die, your circuitry degrades yeah, but you sure as hell keep on to the overall spirit.

Don't be a dummy, and maybe don't listen to sexually deviant basedboy academics talk about death, and go out and look for info about this from actual professionals and military types.

[Anonymous No.3672442]

sorry for being mean and spamming

[Anonymous No.3672446]

>>3672442
exquisite filename

[Anonymous No.3672557]

Literally any woman with a non-physical hobby/interest is insane from my experience.

Every girl who likes drawing, every girl who likes video games, every girl who likes board games and every girl who likes playing music, all insane.

[Anonymous No.3672565]

>>3672557
A girl who likes knitting?

[Anonymous No.3672833]

>>3672422
>IF YOU WANT MORE EMPLOYEE PROTECTIONS FROM BEING "UNFAIRLY" FIRED YOU'RE A SECRET LEFTIST.
Hitler was left wing according to you? Are you a boomer?
>neocons said this and then this
Nobody cares what (((neocons))) said or didn't say. I was against senseless war under Bush, Obama and under Trump, like most actual right wingers. The biggest right wing outrage against Trump was because of the air strikes in Syria if that tells you anything. Seriously what are those elusive right wingers you met like, they sound like NPCs. There is A LOT more ideological difference among the right than the left at least. The left only has absolute chaos anarchists or communist dictatorship apart from the neolibs. Neoliberal and Neocon are basicly the same so I don't really count those to either side anyways. On every issue imaginable you get different strains of right wing that disagree on it, I mean look at National Socialism vs Monarchy vs Neocucks vs Libertarians vs Classical Liberal vs anything inbetween.

>>3672442
You better be.

[Anonymous No.3673142]

>>3672833
>Hitler was left wing according to you?
Hitler was a right wing nationalist fascist that took over the national socialist workers party. Is Hitler the only frame of reference you have for anything? Why in the wet fuck do you retardedly hop to Hitler for no reason?
>Are you a boomer?
Are you fucking retarded?
>Nobody cares what (((neocons))) said or didn't say.
Yeah they do. You just fucking hopped to goddamn 1930s Germany to make historical parallels but oh no hopping to what the same people that are in power now said 12 years ago?! Nobody cares about that!
>I was against senseless war under Bush, Obama and under Trump, like most actual right wingers.
Well you were probably fucking 3 in 2003 so I don't believe you. "Actual right wingers" were OVERWHELMINGLY in favor of war on terror memes when that circlejerk was happening.
>The biggest right wing outrage against Trump was because of the air strikes in Syria if that tells you anything.
Yeah because you're not "right wing." You're "Russian." The media you are consuming and the agents of influence you trust are literally fucking Russians that don't want more US interference in their playground.
>Seriously what are those elusive right wingers you met like, they sound like NPCs.
You're all inadvertant shils for fucking Exxon and Academi and shit. Billions of dollars are spent every year to make you care about the things you do. Even the "NPC" meme is being boosted and encouraged by the IRA and other messaging agencies to encourage dipshits to dehumanize anyone they don't like as a computer program. People that say NPC are unironically NPC as fuck. You're acting as programmed.
>There is A LOT more ideological difference among the right than the left at least.
No. There's a LOT more cognitive dissonance and self-justification on the right right now because you're forced to shill for corporatist cancer that makes your own life worse.

[Anonymous No.3673150]

>>3672833
>The left only has absolute chaos anarchists or communist dictatorship apart from the neolibs.
It's funny how you believe this.
>Neoliberal and Neocon are basicly the same so I don't really count those to either side anyways.
Fun with labeling fallacies huzzah! Nobody cares what you "count" m8. Your subjective feelings about your misunderstanding of overused political meme labels doesn't matter.
>On every issue imaginable you get different strains of right wing that disagree on it,
And on every election you get EVERY ONE OF THEM voting for the same person. There is a diversity of opinion in any group. Doesn't really matter how you justify yourself when you all get to the same place in the end.
>I mean look at National Socialism vs Monarchy vs Neocucks vs Libertarians vs Classical Liberal vs anything inbetween.
You're not making an argument. Nobody said you weren't a beautiful and unique snowflake. This whole diversion essay means nothing.
>You better be.
The people you trust want you to kill your self.

[Anonymous No.3673312]

>>3668553
>>3668591
>Like someone's art, sometimes it's even explicitly their "art account"
>Follow them so i can see art on the feed
> Pinned/most recent tweet: TRUMMP IS A FUCKING RACIST REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

I'm perfectly aware this is not the majority of the left, and that the right/center also have their petty hang-ups, but the fact that most people are left-leaning means i see anti-right stuff more often. To the level where even inaction means you're the enemy because you "must love the bigoted status quo".

The worst part is I'm not even a burger so I can't help even if I wanted.