/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.5157860]

Time to leave Twitter if like me, you draw NSFW.

[Anonymous No.5157864]

nigga, you lose nothing by uploading shit until you’re banned
you know you can use more than one platform at a time, right?

[Anonymous No.5157873]

>>5157860
I hope you guys know that the winds are changing everywhere on the internet, soon all surface level social media sites will ban porn and sites that actually do host it will be completely neutered or under constant threat of being taken down.

Why anybody thought it would be a good idea to pin their lifelong career on porn is beyond me.

[Anonymous No.5157881]

>>5157873
You’re utterly retarded if you think there will not be a platform to fill the vacuum and tap into a market as insanely huge and profitable as porn, and exerting enough pressure to shut down such a singular access point would be literally impossible without creating an even bigger vacuum to be filled, this time by a payment processor, and the potential profit from it would overpower any interest in pushing an impossible agenda

[Anonymous No.5157884]

Pornhub but for artists when?

[Anonymous No.5157887]

>>5157884
Never. I want there to be chaos and dismay so it’s harder for others to succeed while I continue to hog the lying’s share

[Anonymous No.5157889]

>>5157887
this, it’s a doggy dog world

[Anonymous No.5157893]

>>5157860
You're a few years late on the news flash but yes you are not supposed to have NSFW in your profile image nor your banner because this is not protected by the sensitive media warning.

[Anonymous No.5157934]

>>5157873
>I hope you guys know that the winds are changing everywhere on the internet
queue steam allowing porn games only two years ago

[Anonymous No.5157941]

>>5157873
Social media like Twitter and Facebook have not helped themselves in refusing to take down cp.

https://nypost.com/2021/01/22/twitters-policing-problem/

>
OPINION
Twitter’s policing problem
By Post Editorial Board

January 22, 2021 | 7:03pm


Twitter's policing problem
According to a federal lawsuit, Twitter took more than a month to remove widely viewed images and videos of a teen sex-trafficking victim.
AP
After permanently banning then-President Donald Trump from its platform, Twitter took only seconds to delete a defiant tweet from his official government account. Yet it’s not nearly so fleet-footed about child pornography and death threats. So can anyone buy its claims to police without bias?

>According to a federal lawsuit filed this week in California, Twitter took more than a month, refusing countless pleas along the way, to remove widely viewed images and videos of a teen sex-trafficking victim. The suit, filed by the victim and his mom, accuses Twitter of making money off the child-porn clips, which the victim says traffickers blackmailed him into making when he was 13.

>One even included a second child, yet when the clips showed up on Twitter in 2019, the company refused to remove them, saying it “didn’t find a violation” of its “policies.”

[Anonymous No.5157947]

>>5157873
Social media like Twitter and Facebook have not helped themselves in refusing to take down cp.

https://nypost.com/2021/01/22/twitters-policing-problem/

>After permanently banning then-President Donald Trump from its platform, Twitter took only seconds to delete a defiant tweet from his official government account. Yet it’s not nearly so fleet-footed about child pornography and death threats. So can anyone buy its claims to police without bias?

>According to a federal lawsuit filed this week in California, Twitter took more than a month, refusing countless pleas along the way, to remove widely viewed images and videos of a teen sex-trafficking victim. The suit, filed by the victim and his mom, accuses Twitter of making money off the child-porn clips, which the victim says traffickers blackmailed him into making when he was 13.

>One even included a second child, yet when the clips showed up on Twitter in 2019, the company refused to remove them, saying it “didn’t find a violation” of its “policies.”

[Anonymous No.5157970]

>>5157893
The only thing that isn't protected by sensitive media warning is profile pictures. Backgrounds don't appear anymore and if you click an NSFW profile it will warn you unless the person is a retard that posts NSFW while listing their profile as SFW so normies end up stumbling on it.

[Anonymous No.5157973]

Who the fuck is banning porn? I know the 90's it was the Christians and republicans who hated bporn.

[Anonymous No.5157977]

>>5157973
It’s the Democrats time to ban, hopefully Biden bans all porn and I’m gonna laugh so hard my sides would reach escape velocity when all the nsfw artist get the biggest middle finger ever.

[Anonymous No.5157981]

So they tried to change to a nsfw banner image? The post and Ennorei's statement say 2 different things. But Twitter tells you that nsfw isn't allowed in the profile pic or the banner, they probably have bots that look for that shit

[Anonymous No.5157983]

>>5157973
>Accept anyone that'll use your website until half your site is NSFW.
>Stab them in the back because you want to be seen as family friendly.
>Realize you've stabbed yourself in the back as well.
>Bleed out and die.

[Anonymous No.5157985]

>>5157973
Advertisers.

[Anonymous No.5157990]

>>5157873
that's right, kneel coomer. Beg for your life or suffer.

[Anonymous No.5157994]

>>5157860
It's just the banner and profile image. Keep posting on twitter you big baby.

[Anonymous No.5158053]

>>5157881
It doesn't matter how profitable porn can be if no payment processor will actually work with it. Banks and credit card companies are essentially the moral police of online commerce. They can blacklist anyone faster than you can blink. Of course that's always been true to some extent, but the issue today is that cultural attitudes are shifting in favor of censoring sexualized content. Funnily enough, both left-wing hyper-progressives and right-wing fundamentalist christians are in perfect agreement that porn and oversexualization are huge problems. If these ideas get enough traction then a ton of online porn could basically become illegal -- there have always been laws against obscenity, and it's completely up to our culture to decide what is and isn't defined as "obscene".

[Anonymous No.5158054]

>>5157881
They don't want to ban porn, they want to ban YOU being able to make money off porn. And Mastercard+Visa will make it so.

[Anonymous No.5158070]

Why is porn bad and all these credit card companies and social media sites want to ban porn BUT OnlyFans is empowering for females?

[Anonymous No.5158082]

Time to stop being a degenerate. Clap

[Anonymous No.5158102]

>>5158070
onlyfans is a chink money laundering scheme.

[Anonymous No.5158105]

>>5157860
what is a good fediverse instance for art?

[Anonymous No.5158109]

>>5157977
>>5157990

[Anonymous No.5158111]

>>5158109
>t.nsfw artist

[Anonymous No.5158259]

>>5157860
Doesn't Baraag.net already exist with a somewhat active porn-artist base?
Seen Jurion there actively posting

[Anonymous No.5158266]

no nsfw in icon or banners always been a twitter rule.

[Anonymous No.5158272]

>>5157860
i can't care less

[Anonymous No.5158306]

>>5158070
because most coomer artists are guys making money. Cant have that goy

[Anonymous No.5158370]

Good. Maybe these degenerates can learn about how to swing a hammer and put in an honest days work in the real world.

[Anonymous No.5158446]

>>5157881
uh y'know tumblr got shut down pretty easily and it was the biggest and most visited artsy site on the web, why? because google said they'll remove them from the app store if they continue to host porn

you're acting like there is some unseen balance in the background created to ensure that porn is freely hosted at least in one point of the internet. Dude it's just porn and mainstream sites are getting tired of flooding their feeds with nsfw beg drawings and furry portraits

[Anonymous No.5158447]

>>5157973
normal human beings who don't want to see dicks while randomly scrolling on twitter? just go watch porn or something

[Anonymous No.5158449]

>>5158070
how is that even remotely related, onlyfans is not a mainstream site, it's specifically created to host paywalled skimpy shit mostly nudity

[Anonymous No.5158469]

>>5157864
how come there's only one guy in this thread with this perspective? its the most logical option- use the site, get as much as you can out of it for as long as you can, and when the banhammer comes down just move on. have backups, its that simple

[Anonymous No.5158473]

>>5158469
well if two sites have the same owner like insta as example then your ip is probably already flagged in their system which serves as a shared database for all their platforms

[Anonymous No.5158490]

>>5158053
Banks only ban extreme content for moral reasons and even then half of that is a PR move. The reason that banks and PPs struggle with allowing porn is because due to "The West"'s Evangelical moral values towards sex people who buy porn frequently chargeback those purchases. In other countries that don't have such puritan values around sex these issues don't exist.
"hyper-progressives" don't agree on sex. Progressives are firmly split into two camps, people who believe in the second wave values which cause them to hate pornography even when not an industry, and people who believe in the third wave values of porn being just another form of work and it being no more inherently exploitative than any other form of labor. There is no clean and easy way to identify who is in which camp unless they say so themselves.
I think that conservatives seem to be a lot more in agreement on porn being bad but I do think there are enclaves that don't agree with porn bans such as hardline libertarians.
>>5158446
Tumblr banned porn and then everybody jumped ship. An alternative was found, that's what the anon is saying will happen.
>>5158070
It's two different groups of people saying different things. One side says that all porn is morally bad for X reason and the other side is saying that OnlyFans can be empowering in that it lets people craft how the public sees their sexuality. The former side hates onlyfans, the latter side is desperately trying to figure out how to unfuck the situation with the banks.

[Anonymous No.5158526]

>>5158446
>replies to a graph of tumblr dying because of the porn ban with hurr durr tumblr

[Anonymous No.5158604]

>>5157873
I didn’t know social media was BASED

[Anonymous No.5158617]

>>5157873
absolutely based