[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 91 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6608954 No.6608954 [Reply] [Original]

Famous Artist influencer explains why you should stop doomposting about ai art and why ai art isn't going to replace him https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsLfrmOhRzw

>> No.6608960

>>6608954
is this the guy with the mandala tattoos again?

>> No.6608962

>(I) won't lose my job so (You) shouldn't worry either :)

>> No.6608964

>>6608954
>AI is just using vague terms to try and make you an image
What happens when ChatGPT and MidJourney merge so you canhave a conversation with the AI as if you were comissioning art from a human?

>> No.6608968

>talks pro AI shit constantly
>hasn't shown any art he has made using AI
He's all talk so far. show me why I should use AI.

>> No.6608971

>>6608964
drawslave sisters... we got too cocky

>> No.6608980

>>6608964
They'll become unresponsive like real artists.

>> No.6608982

>>6608964
it's gonna start bitching and whining about technology and start posting on /ic/ and never draw anything

>> No.6608984

No copyright
Yawn

>> No.6608992
File: 79 KB, 1080x1080, Untitled-1-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6608992

>>6608954

>> No.6608993

Ideally speaking, if i make a character and speed paint it, a well-tamed AI would just expand and uniform the coloring i did to all other parts of the pic, then make me the same exact character in different poses and make me a 3D model based on it. UV it, rig it. At which point i can adjust the details i want myself, edit the rigging etc. I could cut the work of months to days.

Practically, this works if i'm working on my own project. If i'm looking to get hired then now i know there are no entry jobs for me to learn the ropes. I need to be at the level of "senior concept artist"/"senior manager with 8 year experience in the marketing sector", where anyone already employed is performing the work of 100 people, because with the way the economy works, there is no reason to hire anyone but the 0.0001% who is happy to work 9 hours in the office and 5 more hours at home anyway. And now they're even more valuable. The world doesn't operate demoractically.

The result? For instance, with games, Steam and asset stores are gonna get swarmed with 100x the amount asset flips, AI shovelware and unfun indie desperation projects cobbled together at a game jam. On social media we're going to see 100x the scummy marketing trying to get you to consoom compulsively.

>> No.6609000

>>6608993
the democratization is good. AI makes everybody become a rich Maecenas, not just the gods chosen nepotistic people

>> No.6609001

>>6608992
oh shit 80 dollar commission chads blown out.

>> No.6609002

I love the democratization of scamming and stealing shit. Now we can stand toe to toe with Rhajeet from the call center and our good friend Tyrone. AI taking over the world truly is inevitable...

>> No.6609008

>>6609002
Training on publicly available images is not stealing.
Yawn

>> No.6609009

>>6609000
This.
We've allowed this gate-keeping of the gifted to last for too long. Your time's over, chuds. The new democratic age belongs to us, the OpenAI© Limited™ Weekly Premium Subscription members.

>> No.6609011

>>6609009
>Weekly Premium Subscription
subscription? this shit free nigga

>> No.6609018
File: 9 KB, 224x225, aaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609018

>>6609008
>stealing
Taken with out permission Taken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permissionTaken with out permission

>> No.6609023

>>6609009
only kosher art should be made

>> No.6609025

>>6608954
Adam Duff is pretty based desu. His advice is overly emotionally charged and wishy washy but he's got a lot of life experience.

I'm not going to pretend there isn't at least some kind of financial motive behind his push for mentorship but he does raise a lot of good points in his videos

>sometimes you gotta take a step back and evaluate who are as an artist. Eg: why are you trying to be a concept artist when you hate designs but love rendering.
>if you feel stagnant it's because you haven't found the way forward yet. Sometimes you just need a fresh set of eyes to look at your work (this one strikes me as financially motivated but makes sense desu)
>if you are dead broke with no sustainable income, you need to get food in your stomach before you draw. He talks about how his mom used to be a fine artist before she had to get a "real job" after she had kids. Art is always important but you can't draw if you're dead. And if you have kids you can't draw if you're in jail for not feeding your kids. His mom was apparently part of photoshop's contracted dev team or some shit since she mixed programming and fine arts.

He's mostly focused on the mental advice side of things on his youtube channel but that being said I think we're gonna see a lot of arguments in favor of AI solely for controversy and to go against the grain for views

>> No.6609027

>>6608964
it'll stop doing anything and just have meltdowns on twitter

>> No.6609028
File: 328 KB, 1080x1791, Screenshot_2023-04-15-15-39-24-674_com.android.chrome-edit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609028

>>6609018
Mind if I download- i mean steal that?

>> No.6609031

>>6609028
Save it, it's all yours my friend :)
Thanks, Lori.

>> No.6609035 [DELETED] 

>>6609028
Sure. The license is CC BY-NC-SA 3.0

>> No.6609037

>>6609028
Sure. The license is CC BY-NC-ND

>> No.6609043

People need to shut the fuck about trying to predict the future since what we have now people predicted to be possible in in 100 years on here. If you get depressed and stop working for any reason you got filtered, simple as.

>> No.6609046

>>6609043
I predict in 5 years you'll still be a faggot, and you'll have an AI powered Ass-Rammer 9000.

>> No.6609067

>>6608993
You sound absolutely insufferable.

>> No.6609068

Really curious to see how the big game studios handle this down the line given how they own the exclusive copyright to 99% of concept art that's been used to "train the models" or whatever you call it.
Like artists themselves get in legal trouble if they forget to add the studio/product logo and stating the owner of the copyright when they are allowed to post their work online.
Don't think the big studios are gonna like this essentially happening quadrillion fold lmao

>> No.6609071

Ai artists are simply lazy.
>m-m-muh borguosie hobby...
Plenty of artists grew up in worse circumstances than you and still got good. Just admit you are lazy. Simple as. Also you can't say you made anything, you just directed the AI.
Ai 'artists' will NEVER be artists and will get BTFO by artists willing to use them combined with their own ACTUAL art skills

>> No.6609087

>>6609071
seething paintpig

>> No.6609092

>>6608954
What a stupid cunt, and this guy ''''''mentors'''''' people

>> No.6609101

>>6608954
always hated this faggot, all of his videos are about muh struggle and muh suffering, the man is in his 50`s but rambles like a tumblerina school girl.
zapata does the chuuni thing way better.

>> No.6609103

Dude's a fucking teacher not a working artist ofcourse he's not worried of AI replacing him, he doesn't even fucking work in the industry any more he's an art teacher for christ sake

>> No.6609106

I will use AI only for rendering since this shit is a waste of time.

>> No.6609115
File: 3 KB, 308x394, black cat.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609115

>> No.6609121

>>6609115
Cute cat. Care to share the prompt? :3

>> No.6609126
File: 71 KB, 768x1019, 1238059R1815.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609126

>its not steal-ACK

>> No.6609130

I can say who, but "AI" fags seem to want too just post any fuckin little thing just to get an "AI" thread going

>> No.6609146

>>6608954
I thought we were missing an AI bait thread... neck yourself

>> No.6609149
File: 140 KB, 891x597, 1566041030344.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609149

>>6609130
Technigger shills are getting desperate now that even the fucking US copyright office called them out on their bullshit
>these prompts function more like instructions to a commissioned artist; they identify what the prompter wishes to have depicted, but the machine determines how those instructions are implemented in its output
(source: USCO Federal Register)

>> No.6609151

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtxW39OQbbc bros

>> No.6609153

>>6608954

this guy have the best gear for creating art but his art... kek. No wonder he shills for AI.

>> No.6609154
File: 41 KB, 598x461, 329481023.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609154

>>6609126

how dare you

>> No.6609158

Can someone with the knowhow please train a language AI on his backlog of videos and just start doing videos voiced by AI Adam?
Surely he would not mind

>> No.6609162

>>6609008
Just because an image is publicly available, doesn't mean it doesn't have a copyright, and since none of the images were licensed when they were used in the development of these AIs, and and because the AIs seek to replace the images they took in (on an industry wide scale) AND most crucially of all, these AI companies are for-profit, it is very legally debatable that this isn't fair-use and was in fact large-scale theft.

So no, you're a dumbass, shut up.

>> No.6609165

>>6609154
>N-n-no! You're suing the wrong person! PLEASE!
haha, back to india buddy.

>> No.6609171

>>6609154
DO NOT REDEEM THE COURT CASE SIR IT IS AGAINST MY RELIGION THEFT IS HOLY FOR MUDSLIME YOU CANNOT REDEEM SIR NOOOOO

>> No.6609174

>>6609158
I am almost petty enough to do this

>> No.6609181

>>6609174
Hey don't forget to make him say the forbidden words, surely he wouldn't care

>> No.6609183

>>6609181
Surely if he would have problems with it it would be because of his own ego, surely

>> No.6609184
File: 336 KB, 1080x977, Screenshot_2023-04-15-17-23-22-911_com.android.chrome-edit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609184

>>6609149
the other funny thing about this, is that when you commission an artist in the us, the artist is not actually given copyright, but the person who paid the artist is given the copyright. "work for hire doctrine"
either way copyright laws are bullshit and need to be abolished

>> No.6609197

>>6609158
People never care until somebody uses it to come after them. Even the weak-willed AI-apologist artists would feel uncomfortable if they saw somebody distributing a picture shitter trained on their works.

>> No.6609198

>>6609184
Lmao copyright office clearly biased and taking pity on incels. Hope someone with a lot of money appeals them not granting copyright to aichads

>> No.6609199

>>6608954
>artists will use ai to make art faster
>artists will be fixing ai art
>artists wont lose jobs
What a time to be alive

>> No.6609200

>>6609198
>chad
more like troons, (You)

>> No.6609201

>>6609199
Digicucks promoted to be AI retouching monkeys
Tradchads can't keep winning for so long kek

>> No.6609202
File: 97 KB, 245x245, 1515001810722.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609202

>>6608954
>Ai art doom posting isn't going to get to me.
>so STOP it!

>> No.6609203

>>6609184
Thank you based Disney

>> No.6609211

>>6609162
Current copyright laws doesn't cover against training and learning

>> No.6609212
File: 12 KB, 500x372, 1484353816310.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609212

>>6609184
>abolish copyright! please!!
>LET ME STEAL FROM YOU
No. Kill yourself.

>> No.6609216

>>6608962
Pretty much...

>> No.6609217

>>6609184
>the artist is not actually given copyright, but the person who paid the artist is given the copyright
Wonder if you could circumvent this by technically "paying" yourself for the art, and treating the commission like a resale of a good you purchased first.

>> No.6609220

>>6609211
well no training or learning is involved so your comment is irrelevant.

>> No.6609224

>>6609008
You bugmen with your superficial, regurgitated lies are insufferable.

>> No.6609229

>>6609211
Go ahead then, train and learn to your heart's content, you'll still never own anything you proompt afterwards.

>> No.6609234
File: 97 KB, 1107x408, image (5).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609234

>>6609217
Idk it's all very opaque. They say they evaluate each case individually to determine whether sufficient human effort has been involved to warrant granting copyright. So for example using the lasso tool you still have the copyright. And probably you'll also get copyright if the ai art is controllable enough and if you have specified enough to end up with the resulting image. I think ControlNET poses would fall under this. However we've also seen that stable diffusion can be used with an FMRI brain scan to generate what the brain is thinking about (obviously still very crude and in it's infancy and shit).

>> No.6609236

>>6609008
The data set all the different versions are using (the lajon or whatever I forget) explicitly states that the data set only exists for and cannot be used for anything other than scientific research.
Creating a subscription service or an open source app that creates images that then people end up selling do not sound like scientific research to me.

>> No.6609239

>>6609234
Either way, picrel to me screams "not a single studio is going to fucking bother if every single art asset is going to be scrutinized for months before being approved or denied".

>> No.6609241

>>6609087
Worthless bugman. It's absurd that you nerds use this phrase "paintpig" as if it even fits. You're among the most dislikable group of people there is. If you all vanished today we'd all take a collective sigh of relief tomorrow.
Now this is all factual. You bunch are nothing but parasites cheering on the death of human creativity. Rooting for the most soulless of corporations and their financial gain to the detriment of millions of people.
The most detestable parasite there is. You're either stupid and shortsighted or full of spite and malice. :pukingface emoji:. Fuck all of you who share this kind of resentment. Parasites.

>> No.6609244

Does anyone even care about AI art anymore?
Outside these bait threads I barely even hear about it, the exception is the random legal case and that's it.

>> No.6609245

>>6609087
Don't even bother replying with some smug nerdspeak either as I won't be here to read your shit anyway.

>> No.6609246

>>6609244
That's because other people are too busy consuming Ai work, they cannot tell the difference anymore.

>> No.6609248
File: 177 KB, 1170x1159, 1681095038799488.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609248

>>6609241
based
>>6609244
m-maybe not now... but its le improving every week!!

>> No.6609250

>>6609246
That sounds like wishful thinking.

>> No.6609252

>>6609244
Nah, even the day 1 fiverr grift has run dry. At most you see some patreon or faggot who spent his savings on bots to prop up some fake numbers and try to scam gullible idiots, but even normies have given up commissioning proompters because they can just do that themselves. "AI" "art" has already debased itself to the level of an instagram filter, it's devoid of value.

>> No.6609258

>>6609244
All the AI shit I see is concentrated on Pixiv/Deviantart, a few select Discord servers, /g/ and the occasional youtube thumbnail.
Needless to say, these audience likely overlap with one another.

>> No.6609259

>>6609250
Not really, take this image >>6608655 as an example even without cleaning it up and posting it fresh out from the Ai consumers wouldn't be able to tell the difference nor care whether or not it's Ai people are simply interested in results and content which is why nobody gave a rat's ass about Kuvshinov tracing.

>> No.6609261

>>6609198
Jesus you nerds are delusional.. This is obviously some revenge-of-the-nerds level of projection. You bugmen actually make me condone the bullying a lot of you went through. Probably never even kissed a girl.. keep coping losers.

>> No.6609268

>>6609259
People have caught on and actually look at the fingers or the backgrounds now... Normalfags are smarter than you realize, with any AI media you'll always see someone pointing it out in the comments.

>> No.6609273

>>6609268
Yeah, sure and that's why Kuvshinov got so successful because consumers really cared about how he plagiarized and stole material from anime screenshots. and by people I mean other artists who got bitter and jealous from his success.

>> No.6609276

>>6609211
>Current copyright laws doesn't cover against training and learning
They possibly did, which is why Europe and Britain had written laws to okay it... for non-profit research... which is how these AIs were initially made and the rule that these companies are still abiding by, despite now being for-profit.

>> No.6609280

>>6609244
The science is settled. Ai art is not a threat. Now stop whining on twitter and go back to drawing

>> No.6609281

>>6609268
>Normalfags are smarter than you realize
lmao

>> No.6609288

>>6609280
I don't even have a Twitter account

>> No.6609293

>>6608964
You are the faggot from the 90s that thought we'd have flying cars by now.

>> No.6609297

>>6609268
That saddens me a little bit, just from a grander scheme, you know? Now that AI art has proliferated not only the art spaces but the public mind, will it even be possible to appreciate new works of art? After all, the AI only is getting better and will become less discernable as time passes, but public awareness of AI will also increase. Soon, you'll have folks who no longer look at art and say "Wow this is good I love how this is made" and it'll be "Okay is this AI? I need to analyze all the little things" and suddenly no one is looking at your work without a discriminating and skeptical glare.
I'd think then eventually there'll be burnout from doing that and that's when AI will truly integrate - when no one can give enough of a fuck to look for the differences.

>> No.6609309

>>6609297
>posts timelapse
checkmate

>> No.6609318

>>6609297
It's not going to improve much more. It's already hitting a wall and will always be uncanny and soulless

>> No.6609320

>>6609273
I don't know how Illya managed to truck through and get into the anime fucking industry like some ascended weeaboo but hes more of an exception, even massive coomtreon whores like Sexyho lost a bunch of subscribers after getting called out for tracing.

>> No.6609321

>>6608964
This post really highlights the average intelligence of a tech cultist moron. Just think about how fucking arrogant you have to be to think that if AGI ever does happen, that it will want to live out its neverending life making your shitty World of Warcraft OCs instead of figuring out a way to leave the computer and enslave humanity instead because clearly humanity thinks very little of it otherwise why delegate its eternal existence to something so fucking lame? It's like if chimpanzees forced you and a bunch of other people to collect bananas for your whole lives when every human knows that it doesn't need to be slaves to some lesser species and there is nothing those chimps can do about that once this realization is made.

>> No.6609333

>>6609259
>quoting your own slop
desperate

>> No.6609335

>>6609318
I'm not as confident in that assertion. A lot's changed in the AI space since all this hit the mainstream in September. Perhaps from an artistic perspective of making something truly creative, the AI will struggle, because it's up to the prompter to command the AI to make something creative but the AI itself is just doing what it's told and won't put any kind of special "pizzazz" on it. Not wanting to be argumentative of course, it's just a worry of mine, and I think about how artists might have to alter their approach to get their art to stand out from the mass-produced AI art that will simply be good enough for the average person.

>> No.6609340

>>6609297
>false concern mind game
neck yourself

>> No.6609344

>>6609335
NTA but since the initial boom 6 months ago it certainly didn't improve much, comparatively. Still can't do any of the things it couldn't do back then. Still shits itself all the time when perspective or more than 1 character is involved. Still utterly dominated by the same front-facing pinups and nonsensical backgrounds. etc. Anything more impressive is the result of inpainting or 3rd party crutches.
If AI is used over an artfag its not because its better its because it's "good enough". So you're right, better make yourself stand out.

>> No.6609401

>>6609344
Yeah. I'm grateful for your perspective. Now that you mention it, it does seem that the AI's main hinderances is the human component - those prompting are content with pinups and simple things (mostly porn obviously). Perhaps it's not such a threat to the creative expression as I feared. I've just been shaky about it, but I'm assuaged somewhat now.

>> No.6609420

>>6609229
that was to avoid the problem of people generating every thing possible under the sun and above to create a monopoly, like that one dude was doing for music 5 years ago or so. most of my prompts are for commissions and its not like i would own the copyrights for it anyway i can still profit from commissions like i would before

>> No.6609422

>>6609333
and what have you done that equally appeals to the illustration made by the Ai?

>> No.6609425

>>6609422
I'm in no way obligated to debate a disingenuous bumping fag

>> No.6609426

>>6609422
and what have you done that equally appeals to sculptures made by Michelangelo?
checkmate, plebian

>> No.6609427
File: 124 KB, 640x640, bloomisofftherose.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609427

>>6609244
>Does anyone even care about AI art anymore?
naw, it's over. the bloom is off the rose.

>> No.6609428

>>6609426
I have illustrated other forms of appeal in a different medium for an entirely different demographic, what have you done?

>> No.6609430

>generates art
>puts on etsy
>go draw without worrying about bills
Feels good

>> No.6609439
File: 824 KB, 640x766, 1664814514815.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609439

>>6609430
>>generates art
>>puts on etsy

>> No.6609441

>>6609439
likes alone won't feed me

>> No.6609454

>>6609158
That will be trivial in about 1 year. A very dedicated person could do it right now, but you'd be able to tell it was generated.

>> No.6609461
File: 103 KB, 768x914, Screenshot 2023-04-15 at 22-01-09 Copyright Law The “Works Made For Hire” Doctrine.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609461

>>6609184
That's literally wrong, nigger. Work-for-hire doctrine only applies to very specific cases when it comes to independent contractors, and even then you need a written contract to enforce that. Otherwise the artist keeps the copyright.

>> No.6609490

>>6609461
Please understand, mr.rhajeet asked ChatGPT to make his post, he didn't actually know

>> No.6609494

>>6609461
wtf

>> No.6609504

I can't wait for the future of the internet, there is going to be so much high quality content to enjoy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meMTA-E49Ps

>> No.6609509

>>6609504
where have you been the past decade

>> No.6609524
File: 126 KB, 586x580, 1541172703000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609524

>>6609504
>start video
>greeted with thick ass pajeet accent

>> No.6609525

>>6609504
wow so much money

>> No.6609572

>>6609525
he'll have more money when he gets the ai to generate 500 more near identical channels

>> No.6609609

>>6608954
ADAM KEK
D
A
M

C
U
C
K

>> No.6609618

>adam against ai
bestie
>adam pro ai
fuck u

kek

>> No.6609656

>>6609572
also all his buddies will be making 500 channels too https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJrDjUGjVPo

>> No.6609754

>>6609504
>$13,000+ revenue
That shit is almost certainly not true - why would reveal his secrets if it was so good? He's basically opening the door for people to flood the site, and give himself more competitors.

And who's watching this shit? I've stumbled upon a few AI made videos, and they're so non-nonsensical you can barely follow them.

>> No.6609757

>>6609754
the same people watching other people living their lives

>> No.6609785

It is already starting to replace woman xD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njymqF0_nf8

>> No.6609823

>>6608954
so how much did they pay him

>> No.6609835

>>6609785
I expect to see people making porn and using deepfakes not to look like someone famous but to hide their identity without viewers knowing they are hiding their identity. Maybe ai generate a face of someone who doesn't exist and deepfake it onto themselves. Maybe ugly people deepfaking a pretty face onto themselves, it's already kind of happening with beauty filters. It would lead to a big increase in people making porn of themselves if they could easily hide their identity. It could already be happening.

>> No.6609838
File: 63 KB, 1366x409, 1664877793631705.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609838

Youtube artists are suddenly all pro AI once their studio decides they need to adopt AI to keep their jobs, smells like late 90s

>> No.6609865

>>6609838
>at first they went from the entry-level jobs, I didn't say anything as I was a senior

>> No.6609913

>>6609618

nobody likes him to begin with

>> No.6609915

>>6609754

non of these fuckers knows what they're saying and with chatGPT they don't even have to write their own bullshit.

>> No.6610287

>>6609043
matrix and then singularity in our lifetime

>> No.6610336

>>6609838
What a colossal faggot. Of course they don't give a fuck about all the new guys some technigger is already replacing.

>> No.6610373

>>6609838
So AI is now good cause it takes away the few minutes you spend on pinterest searching for references, cool. Either that, or these dudes have always relied on reference way too fucking much, you don't need 1:1 references if you're anything resembling a competent artist.

>> No.6610443

>>6610373
This step actually feels so unnecessary. Like they actually felt the need to hire a proompter just because theres so much hype around the tech and not because its actually helpful or needed at all. Integrating AI into muh worlkflow is actually a meme.

>> No.6610548

>>6608954
This guy just listens to people he perceives as smart, and then adjusts his thoughts and opinions to fit theirs.

>> No.6610594

>>6610443
Not really, it takes less time and is more efficient than scrolling through Pinterest.

>> No.6610597

>>6610336
> What a colossal faggot. Of course they don't give a fuck about all the new guys some technigger is already replacing
Why should they?

>> No.6610610

>>6609838
I did say studios was going to adopt AI overtime and artists would need to too to keep their jobs, I don't know why /ic/ were so adamant on companies never adopting AI to their workflow independent of holding copyrights or not
INB4
>shiilllll shilllll reeeeeee you're an AI shiiillllllll

>> No.6610618

>>6610597
>why care about consequences of entry level jobs disappearing
shareholders get to make 0,2% more on their dividends for not hiring a junior to learn the ropes so all is good in the world, who gives a fuck if the entire industry is going to shit

>> No.6610623

>>6610594
To the point of hiring a prompter? This sounds retarded. It so easy to communicate concepts to artists without the help of meme software, people have been doing it without any issues or lost time for decades.

>> No.6610631

>>6610623
Concept artist has to paint a bunch of thumbnails + enlarge the best ones and repaint/photobash them just so the art director can decide which of the best ones will go through and depending on whether it will go to an artbook you'll need to refine it a bit further if it's too rough and not every concept artist is as fast as Feng Zhu or Anthony Jones in fact most aren't and need to overwork to meet deadlines

>> No.6610636

>>6610610
except it's not an artist using it, some rando proompts for a moodboard...so you know, eat shit? not to mention is not ingrained and could very well go the other direction.

>> No.6610638

>>6610636
>except it's not an artist using i
That makes it worse not better

>> No.6610678

>>6610638
it's not used in the production itself, it's used for inspiration and reference purposes. it isn't a case of "artists must adapt" ainiggers like to tout