[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Search:


View post   

>> No.1858637 [View]
File: 95 KB, 960x720, 1230836769394.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1858637

I just spent the last twenty minutes rubbing a twelve year old girl\'s bare chest.

\"How?\" you ask. Well apparently there are a select few contexts within which such an action is acceptable. For instance, if your niece has a hacking cough and your sister asks you to \"put some of this on her\" while she calls the doctor.

\"Putting some of this on her\" meant using my bare hands to rub this vapor ointment shit all over her BARE NAKED CHEST. My heartbeat is still all erratic from it. I had a boner the size of manhattan the entire time. She\'s sleeping now and I guess she feels better because she stopped coughing.

Details: She\'s about 5 feet tall, has long brown hair, a cute face, a thin waist and long skinny legs. She\'s in jammies I think because although I\'m pretty shaken up right now I know I unbuttoned something before I went at it.

God I feel so great. I just rubbed my hands all over her FUCKING TITS, you guys. Well the puffy parts of her chest anyway. Her nipples got hard. I just about wept tears of joy.

I didn\'t do anything else because I\'m a coward and rubbing was enough. Plus it was legal and I didn\'t technically do anything wrong, so I\'m in the clear.

I\'d write more but I seriously have to go fap while the memory is fresh in my head.

>> No.1854504 [View]
File: 191 KB, 810x1163, pure32_036.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1854504

this is a pic of my angel with lovely 12 year old legs and i\'m going to post it everyday until you like it

>> No.1844006 [View]

>>1844001
>sage 84.150.126.57

how did you know my ip address? could a mod please delete thisp ost?

>> No.1843954 [View]
File: 65 KB, 610x931, 1230646642548.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1843954

>>1843952

get in the car!

>> No.1843944 [View]
File: 191 KB, 810x1163, pure32_036.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1843944

this is my angel and i'm going to keep posting it until you like it

>> No.1843927 [View]
File: 93 KB, 427x640, 1230645999968.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1843927

>>1843925
>i'd hit it with my penis

tell us something we DONT know xP

>> No.1843915 [View]
File: 81 KB, 427x640, 1230645539296.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1843915

>>1843888
>12 years old...
>i like it (^^)

me too. when it comes to girls, i think 11/12 years old is the perfect age.

speaking as a pedophile/ephebophile, i don't like toddlers so anyone under 6 is ruled out.

girls between 7 and 10 still resemble babies too much and they might still have the remnants of baby fat (which i dont like) so apart from some expections, girls in this age group are ruled out.

girls over 13 have already been exposed to materialism/consumerism and are starting to learn the harsh realities of life and will become mean/jaded/cynical/man-hating for it. in terms of looks, girls between 13 and 17 are good but their personalities are starting to wither away.

females over 18: nothing more needs to be said.

so what are we left with? 11 and 12 year old girls = PERFECTION.

>> No.1843889 [View]
File: 187 KB, 1024x768, 1230645018508.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1843889

>>1843874
>Proceed.

somebody needs to find a rapidimagedump

>> No.1843885 [View]
File: 92 KB, 736x688, 1129579286880.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1843885

kawaii15 forums told me her name is murayama mei but imo she doesnt look her.

>> No.1843879 [View]
File: 93 KB, 640x768, 1230644938727.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1843879

>>1843862
>continue...

sup /b/

>> No.1843849 [View]
File: 65 KB, 610x931, 1230644375046.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1843849

>>1843827
>I already like it so you can stop
>>1843831
>Lets face it, we are never going to like them

here's another pic (of many to come) to help all of you make up your minds

i'd like to draw your attention to her sexy smooth 12 year old (at the time) legs

>> No.1843813 [View]
File: 185 KB, 810x1163, pure32_036.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1843813

this is my angel and i'm going to keep posting it until you like it

>> No.1843552 [View]

>>1843510
>I got banned from /d/ for posting this picture once.

what's wrong with chicks with dicks?

>> No.1843445 [View]
File: 98 KB, 717x1024, 1230637345242.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1843445

>>1843431
>Please don't post any more loli.

request granted

>> No.1843419 [View]
File: 68 KB, 800x583, 1230636989200.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1843419

is anyone browsing this thread on a public computer?

>> No.1843408 [View]
File: 86 KB, 480x800, 1230631555831.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1843408

oishii FC

>> No.1842644 [View]
File: 63 KB, 520x755, 123059258616.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1842644

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28319199/

RICHMOND, Va. - Child pornography is illegal even if the pictures are drawn, a federal appeals panel said in affirming the nation's first conviction under a 2003 federal law against such cartoons.

Dwight Whorley of Richmond is serving 20 years in prison, convicted in 2005 of using a public computer for job-seekers at the Virginia Employment Commission to receive 20 Japanese cartoons, called anime, illustrating young girls being forced to have sex with men. Whorley also received and sent e-mails graphically describing parents sexually molesting their children.

A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday upheld his conviction.

Judge Paul V. Niemeyer noted in the majority opinion that the statute under which Whorley was convicted, the PROTECT Act of 2003, clearly states that "it is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exists."

Appeals to continue
Rob Wagner, the federal public defender who represented Whorley, said he was "very disappointed" with the ruling and that he would ask the full appeals court to reconsider. If that fails, Wagner said he will petition the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case.

Navigation
View posts[-24][+24][+48][+96]