/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>31520551
Months old list now but Pekora probably still in the top

>>31321153
why do you just make up a bunch of bullshit and think it'll stick?

not even going to go per month, lets go by total to disprove this completely retarded opinion.

gura SC
$268,758.10
amelia SC
$169,628.24
ina SC
$125,514.24

total
$563,900.58

vs.

mori SC
$312,955.31
kiara SC
$279,529.42

total
592,484.73

so takamori has $28584 more in SCs.

now total the memberships (using old scraper, outdated as polls show gura has now 15k members and ame has 7k), but this is the best numbers we have so far.

(per month totals):

gura 11912
ame 6770
ina 6116
total 24978

mori 4056
kiara 4092
total 8148

now IF we assume memberships are locked at $5 USD (and that memberships are at this 12k since membership debut sep 24 2020):
((24978 x 3) x 5) + (total from SCs (trinity)) = 938,570.58, total for trinity.

((8148 x 3) x 5) + total from SCs (takamori) = $714704.73

now, its more likely that takamori membership amounts are lower because they have a higher number of SEAnig viewers - due to time zones. but what is the minimum amount of membership $ required for trinity to earn less than takamori?
(SC total takamori) - (SC total trinity) / membercount _total(trinity) = 0.3814

so each membership would have to be <0.38 for takamori to earn more than trinity in TOTAL. note that this is impossible. ARS is the lowest yt currency and converts to .60 dollars.

now what about per month? same idea. going to assume SC total / 3 which is a good enough approximate for monthly SC.

takamori = (SC total/3) = 197,494.91
trinity = (SC total/3) = 187,966.86

difference of $9528
using monthly member numbers with again a liberal criterion of $5, their new total is =
>trinity (sc total/3) + membershiptotal = 312,856
>takamori (sc total/3) + membershiptotal = 238,234

and obviously, they are divided by the same ratio so there is no difference in the minimum member $ required.

now the interesting question is, lets ASSUME we give takamori $5 memberships. what is the minimum $/member for trinity that would be required to make more than takamori?
(member+SCTotalTakamori) - (SCTrinity) / 24978 = $6
so each membership would be $6. of course this is above the USD average, but as you can see, even in takamoris best case scenario - trinity only needs to cover a $1 spread from the liberal criterion.

now note, im actually doing takamori a favour. takamori membership counts are skewed negatively due to the higher proportion of SEA viewers and viewers from countries w/ shit currency exchange rates (i.e. PHP). in reality, trinity would do a lot better because most of their viewers are burgers/euros.

so now what? trinity makes more than takamori, bar none. trinity membership numbers have also increased since then, via poals, don't have takamori memberships so don't know or care.

your next argument is probably,
>but each takamori member makes more than each trinity member.
sure, but the original argument was trinity makes more than takamori. also, gura still makes more than both mori and kiara.

gura monthly revenue:
(11912 x 5) + (268,758 / 3) = $149,146
amelia monthly revenue:
(6770 x 5) + (169,628 / 3) = $90,392
ina
(6116 x 5) + (125,514 / 3) = $72,418

mori
(4056 x 5) + (312,955 / 3) = $124598
kiara
(4092 x 5) + (279,529 / 3) = $113636

again, liberal criterion of $5 that heavily favours takamori. again, sub counts that underestimate trinity. gura clearly makes more. takamori make more than iname, but not by as much as you'd think. and that difference is surely erased when you factor in the things i described above.
at the end of the day, i have nothing against takamori. but please don't try to attack trinity with your bullshit

>>30054643
>still most members
kek
dont spout bullshit. gura has literally more than double her member count.
gura makes more money than mori taking into account sc + membership combined.
fucking retarded deadbeat.

>>29605032
scraper from month of october
gura and ames numbers are higher, guras is closer to 14-15k now

>>29250797
>2nd most memberships in hololive
even assuming they don't average at $5 USD, $3 USD would put her as a top 5 earner in all of hololive.

>>29176826
>thinks mori makes more money than gura
shut the fuck up faggot
read it and weep retard. gura makes the most in all of hololive.
also her true member count is upwards of 15k. had 13k on her more recent poll.
abayo

>>29158123
>gura had 13k member votes on her recent poll too
membership numbers factored in, gura slaps everyone but coco. and shes barely off.

>reminder that moris SC revenue is dropping, guras is catching up, and gura makes much more due to her basically tripling the membership count
>not to mention that these numbers are outdated, due to the massive inflation of membershrimps from guras campfire karaoke. her current member poll has 13k votes. safe to assume that there's at least 15k. another big inflation wave coming in tomorrow, too.

>reminder that gura still makes the most money of any hololiver due to the absurd amount of memberships she has.
not to mention this list has undersold her actual number, which is 12k+ (already 12k votes on the most current poll). expect this to rise to 14-15k when she announces shes holding a member-only karaoke tonight.

>Minimum memberships numbers
Thoughts?

These are the bare minimum memberships for each holo as per a scrapper bot.

>>28743712
>>28745057
Bot scrapper membership numbers. Probably lower than real values.