/jp/ - Otaku Culture

A life?

> Honorary Senior Research Fellow
> Professor
> etc

>>1243729
> A life?

Enjoy your shit life.

>>1243729

>A life?

haha oh wow

>>1243729
You're in /jp/. You have no life.

B-b-b-b-but.... I rewrite ero-doujins! I have done something with my fandom!

You could ask this same question with this same style of post using most accomplished university professor's in /b/.

touhou is contributing to society

>What does Anonymous have?

Maids, and the raping thereof.

>>Breen
What is it now?

I wonder if he (Jim Breen) fantasizes about fucking japanese schoolgirls half a decade younger than him.

>>1243790
What man his age doesn't? What man any age doesn't?

>>1243793

the anti-pedophiles told me that if you're 50 years old, then you're only allowed to find women over 20 years old attractive.

it is not possible for a 15 year old japanese schoolgirl to be attractive.

not at all. nope.

>>1243797
There's no such thing such as anti-pedophiles. There are pedo and pedo in denial (aka moralfags).

>>1243804

i completely agree.

since when did a girl's/woman's age become a factor on whether your penis gets hard or not?

a good looking sexy girl is a good looking sexy girl, whether she's 10 years old, 20 or 30.

what am i supposed to say?

"wow's she's hot! and she has nice tits! what did you say?"

"she's 13 years old, dude"

"i retract my earlier statement. i do not find her hot and i have no opinion about her breast. i am not a pedophile. please believe me"

>>1243811
In the recent years younger and younger girls tend to dress and act like older ones. It's not surprising that there's a rise into pedo and ephebophiles. The ones denying the fact are only women and the "in denial" people.

not to mention the greater proliferation of sex in the media and not to mention the greater access to information about sex.

women and the 'denialers' underestimate the information-gathering and knowledge of children.

not to mention parents dressing their children up like whores.

you might not want me to fuck their little assholes but you're not fucking helping by making your children look sexy.

>>1243830
Why would you want to fuck them anyway? I mean, their hygiene must be awful.

>>1243836
Actually, they have less hormones, so they are cleaner.

>>1243836
>Why would you want to fuck them anyway?

I love underaged girls for many reasons and my age range is anything from 8 to 30 years old. The perfect loli age for me is around 10-12 years old. She still has no pubic hair or breasts but her overall body already has some sexy form.

Flat chests: I love their smooth bare chests with 2 cute little nipples. I like to gently squeeze their breast area so that it looks they do have breasts, then I suck their nipples, pretend breasts and all.

Bald hairless pre-pubescent vagina: God's gift to mankind. Unlike women's vaginas, little girls vaginas are completely hairless and look like beautiful flowers, not fish. My penis would usually be too big to insert into their vagina so I just place the head of my penis onto her vagina and make short and gentle thrusting motions. Alternatively, I like to just use her vagina hole to caress my penis up and down, from the base to the tip. The friction alone is enough to make me cum.

Her little mouth and little fingers: Like her vagina, a little girl's mouth is not enough to take the whole of my penis but they can take enough. The combination of her inexperienced mouth around the tip of my penis and her hands clutched around my shaft is heavenly.

Her carefree and innocent personality: Unlike a woman, a little girl is not bitter, jaded or cynical. Her desire for money hasn't come around yet so she only has one thing that motivates her: curiosity for the unknown. The look of a girl's face when she sees an erect penis for the first time is a mastercard moment.

And that's why I love little girl lolis.

>I mean, their hygiene must be awful.

i'm talking about girls aged in their low-teens. their hygiene isn't any worse or better than anyone else.

>>1243855
Saved for future generations. Beautiful.

>>1243855
Have you actually met a little girl? They dont act like the ones in anime, they act like babies or little children - simple as all hell. No deep understanding or deeper emotions, just here and now. And their values are just as immature. I never understand why pedo's put them up on a pedostool (heh). They way they act just make them seem like kids to me, not sex objects. Even though I like loli hentai.

>>1243870
He is describing loli hentai

>>1243790
Half a decade is 5 years...

You mean half a century, right?

>>1243871
well, in that case I whole heartedly agree

>>1243870
>pedostool
HAHA

>>1243870
>No deep understanding or deeper emotions, just here and now.

As opposed to the deep understanding and deeper emotions of WOMEN?

women don't know what they want, but at least little girls do.

what do little girls want? a simple fun time.

>>1243870
>pedostool
oh god that's actually pretty witty

I still hate myself for laughing at that, though.

Yes, except that his dictionary DOES contain quite a few errors, ambiguities or sometimes even too much information (obscure readings no one needs). Especially the example sentences are prone to errors.
It's not that bad though. Great for quick lookups, just like Wikipedia however, you shouldn't use it for serious study.
Then again, if you were serious you'd go monodic anyway.

>>1243855My penis would usually be too big to insert into their vagina

>>1243924
I want his medical documentation for informational purposes.

>>1243927
I want to take part in the studies that generated the information in the first place.

>>1243924
where did that come from?

>>1243924
Pedo forums?
Do not know if want

It might be interesting to talk with other pedos
but on the other hand
Browsing a pedo forum is like just asking to get monitored by the Van

>>1243945
too late

>>1243924

which forum is that from? i would like to participate in discussions with like-minded people who can accept me for who i am instead of telling me to go to hell and die

>>1243976
https://tips.fbi.gov/

PEDOSTOOL

>>1243988
is that the awesome site that tag you as pedo? if so I should pm a tinyurl link to peoples I dislike linking them to it

>>1243976
Go to hell and die.

>>1243991
I really hate how I read that as pedo stool... (not that theirs are any different compared to normal people's)

>>1244085

whats the url>?

>>1243790 I wonder if he (Jim Breen) fantasizes about fucking japanese schoolgirls half a decade younger than him.

>>half a decade younger than him.
according to wikipedia, he is 61. half a decade is 5 years.
how the fuck are there school girls aged 56? and why would he fantasise about 56 year old 'schoolgirl' grannies?

also fuck yeah monash aussies etc.
my brother goes to monash

>>1244339
I'm assuming he actually meant to type "half a century" which would make them deliciously 11.
mmmm eleven year old elevens

wait, your talking about REAL girls?? Oo

>>1244373
>I'm assuming he actually meant to type "half a century"

yeah thats what i meant


>which would make them deliciously 11.
mmmm eleven year old elevens

i think 11 and 12 year olds are the absolute best loli ages Ever.

I wonder why an investment banker would have so much free time to troll 4chan.

FYI DO NOT use Jim Breen's WWWJDIC. It's riddled with mistakes. Seriously it's the worst fucking dictionary out there... The example sentences are horseshit, and there are so many incorrect entries. Use ALC instead:

http://www.alc.co.jp/

It's much more comprehensive and relatively error free.

>>1244407
alc has plenty of dodgy stuff as well, particularly in the more colloquial sentences, and WWWJDIC is nowhere near as bad as you make out. Stop being such a faggot.

Besides, if you want a really decent dictionary you should just use a monolingual Japanese one anyway.

>>1244457

There are difficulties with any j-e dictionary but some of the mistakes in WWWJIC are fucking horrible. Can't blame it too much since it seems to be compiled by one dude but I wouldn't trust that dictionary as far as I could throw it. It's misleading as fuck and dangerous as a study tool. Avoid it.

are we discussing dictionaries or putting dicts in schoolgirls?

Butthurt weeaboos are butthurt.

>>1244647

no u r the butthurt

I appreciate his work, but he doesn't have the love for Japan. Rather, he's not seeing the connection between what is Japanese and what is English.
Expect to... well you probably won't see it. But I shall move to Japan and create 3 dictionaries.
English-Japanese usage dictionary
English-Japanese colloquial/dialect dictionary
English-Japanese interjection and abbreviation dictionary.

>>1243855

>>1245141
not this shit again

>>1245141

needs more thumbs up

>>1245141
Kaede <3

>>1245141
Go back to bed, wildarmsheero.

>>1243811
Wow, I used to think you were just a troll, but that post made too much sense.

Even if you're Invisible Sky Magician, at least one of your personas is able to post something decent once in a while.

this thread took a turn for the worse

>>1245704this thread took a turn for the better

>>1243855

Spoken like a true pedophile. I am non-plussed by what you wrote, really. Don't you browse akiba-online? I can’t shake the notion that you do.

>I love underaged girls for many reasons and my age range is anything from 8 to 30 years old. The perfect loli age for me is around 10-12 years old. She still has no pubic hair or breasts but her overall body already has some sexy form.

Just out of curiosity, do you prefer Asian or American little girls? depending on how much of an (loli-aesthete) you are. If you are into visual experience then you really treasure the ''appearance' of a 11-13 year old girl, to the point that it's like a torture or a prison of your own fetish: the need for the ultra pretty face and body of a loli should be distressing to your mind and feelings at times? I mean, have you actually had sex with a loli, was it consensual or do just indulge in fantasy about it?

I am a innocuous pedophile myself. But it's more or less of a loli-complex I have. However, I never touched a under age girl in a sexual matter. Since i've been a recluse for 4 years. I probably would if I had the opportunity to. I talk to a lot of U-15 (under 15) girls through networking sites. Mainly asian - in which I think are really cute.

I'd love to go on how much I love little girls as much as you do, but I don't have time and i'm feeling indolent.

>since when did a girl's/woman's age become a factor on whether your penis gets hard or not?

I'd recommend reading "Afternoon of the Sex Children" by Mark Greif from N+1 issue 4, 2006.

>>1246577

>Spoken like a true pedophile.
and ephebophile

>I am non-plussed by what you wrote, really. Don't you browse akiba-online? I can’t shake the notion that you do.
i am a member of akiba-online and kawaii-15.

>Just out of curiosity, do you prefer Asian or American little girls?
it's well known that for any given age, if you compare an asian and american little girl, the asian would be younger-looking and so, better looking.

also, asians tend to go towards the cute "moe" personality, while americans tend to gravitate towards the sex raunch culture, for example Bratz, Britney Spears etc.

i dont know about you, but if i wanted a whore, i'd just date a woman, not a little girl. i like little girls because they are everything women are not.

so for this reason, i tend to prefer asian little girls. that doesn't mean i dont like white little girls. little brown, asian or white girls are fine too.

>depending on how much of an (loli-aesthete) you are. If you are into visual experience then you really treasure the ''appearance' of a 11-13 year old girl, to the point that it's like a torture or a prison of your own fetish: the need for the ultra pretty face and body of a loli should be distressing to your mind and feelings at times?
to use a cliche, i am a prisoner of my sexual preferences and a prisoner of society in the sense that i cannot experience those sexual preferences without going to jail or getting killed by pitchfork-wielding townspeople.

and the parents certainly don't help by dressing up their children in sexy clothes where i cant but help to ogle at their pretty teen legs.

so yes, i am tortured by the fact that i must hide and repress my desires.

>I mean, have you actually had sex with a loli, was it consensual or do just indulge in fantasy about it?
the closest i've been was to have sex with a 15 year old while i was 18. not much of an age difference so there was no trouble.

i found her pretty and sexy back then. i am now 36 years old, and society expects me to no longer find 15 year old girls sexy. the only way i can rebel is by masturbating to the image of that same 15 year old girl from many years ago.

or any other little girl for that matter. masturbating, it's all i can do.

>I am a innocuous pedophile myself. But it's more or less of a loli-complex I have. However, I never touched a under age girl in a sexual matter. Since i've been a recluse for 4 years. I probably would if I had the opportunity to. I talk to a lot of U-15 (under 15) girls through networking sites. Mainly asian - in which I think are really cute.

myspace/facebook/mixi (japanese myspace) little girls are the best.

>>1247808
>>1247808
>>1247805
>>1244383
>>1243976
>>1243903
>>1243855
>>1243830
>>1243811
>>1243797
....
im an amuatur phycologist
i been observing your kind trough out the interwebz
everything you postedin this tread has been logging privatly into compy4
for reaserch purpouses.

MWUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
(mad scientist laugh)

>>1247876
i take that back

i saved the whole *.html file for reaserch purposes

>>1247901

use it wisely.

>>1243855
Get the door, it's Domino's.

If we're on about loli, lemme ask you all something:

If a 10 year old can have pleasurable vaginal sex with a man (and there is evidence both medically and real world that she can), why shouldn't she be allowed to enjoy the physical pleasure of it?

>>1247918
Because children make poor choices. The law is there to prevent some scheming adult from exploiting their stupidity.

>>1247925
My only problem with this is that adults make just as stupid, uninformed decisions as children all the damned time.

>>1247925
So let's say they do it for the wrong reasons. If they don't regret it later, were they taken advantage of?

>>1247931
Hold on, hold on. Don't jump there yet. Let him answer >>1247933 first. You should see where I'm going with this.

>Because children make poor choices

no, SOME children make poor choices
The law just assume they all do to protect the stupid ones, thus it doesn't matter what the loli says you are still raping her

If a conartist takes a bunch of money from people but they don't know they were conned. They were apparently not taken advantage of.

>>1247908
yes i will

my only requirement to accept on who ytou are is
1. DO NOT RAPE ANYONE
thats it
it is easyer for me to accept pedos on who they are the FAGS

>>1247953
>1. DO NOT RAPE ANYONE
>thats it
I will never rape a loli. I will make sure she fully understands the implications of her actions and accepts the act in which she is about to take part.

>>1247952
Bad metaphor. When conned, the victims receive nothing from it, while in sex the loli would be enjoying it - if it's not rape.

>>1247918
This is a rhetorical question right? First, adults are extremely protective of children and any relationship between a child and an adult that is not related is automatically suspect.

It is not said openly, but most men are considered to be dangerous.

The idea of a parent allowing a man to have a relationship with their 10 year old child is unthinkable.

Is this fair to all the loving pedophiles that would enjoy mutual sexual gratification with willing little girls? I guess not.

Is it a good idea in general? I have to say a resounding yes! Even as a pedophile I understand that it is better to play it safe and that society has it mostly right in this case.

tl;dr Yes it would feel good but too many innocent little people would get hurt. Why would you want the object of your love to be hurt?

>>1247963
That's why I think that the statutory rape laws should be lifted and they should make child rape punishable with death. She enjoys it? You're in the clear. She doesn't? You're fucked. Better make sure that your loli's ready for sex before you stick it in, or you're gonna be as fucked as her.

Rape should never get death, regardless of the nature of the rape. It's not to protect the rapist but the person getting raped.

Think about it, if Rape = death and Murder = death, rapist would much more likely to murder their victims since dead people can't talk.

>>1247983
I don't see how that works out, but okay, true. For another interesting point on the death penalty for sexual crimes, read Orson Scott Card's The Memory of Earth series, I think the discussion I'm referring to is in the second book. It gives a very solid argument for why the one punished in mutually consenting sexual crimes (ie: adultery) should be the woman.

That aside, it should be a dreadfully serious penalty.

>>1247983
There are much better reasons why the plan wouldn't work (most child rapists are family members - if the girl tells, she sentences her relative to death), but it was a really simple plan with no follow-through anyway. It'd need more thought to actually be put into practice, yes.

ITT - Pedophila

We just need a licensing procedure to give informed consent. You prove you understand the consequences of sex at 10 and you want to? More power to you. You still can't figure it out by the time you're 30? No procreation for you.

>>1248009
I'm sorry, but as foolishly simple my idea was (>>1247966) yours is just completely utopian. The time, money, and manpower necessary for that is just completely absurd. Completely.

Though I really wish society could do something like that, and stop idiots like Britney Spears from having children.

>>1248009
Suddenly, overpopulation ceases to be a problem. The average IQ will also rise.

>>1248016
>The average IQ will also rise.
IQ is thought not to be genetic. Generally speaking, two intelligent people will give birth to a child with lower IQ, while two idiots will give birth to a child with higher IQ, simply because the parents will be more SDs away from the mean.

Nurture can influence the capacity to learn (which is basically what IQ refers to anyway), but even then, you'd have to find parents committed to such ways of raising children, not just "smart" parents. Even an idiot can raise a child to be a genius.

>sparky4 ミ田 !fd2.gpDmA6!!MDA3sULQCF5

Holy fuck.

Just leave.

>>1248049

no u

>>1248032
Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong wrong wrong. IQ is thought to be a mix of genetic and environmental factors; but the most important component of it is thought to be genetics. All research seems to agree; the only people resisting the genetic part of IQ are egalitarians who resist evidence with a zeal rarely seen outside of Young Earth Creationists.
Many studies of IQ have shown time and time again just how important genetics to be; I don't have any links right now, and I just woke up so I don't really feel like looking, but it's true, however far the poison of the egalitarian philosophy may spread.
Also your point about idiots being more likely to have intelligent children makes no sense. You claim first that IQ is not genetic, then claim that this does have an effect, and in fact an effect in the opposite direction to the parents? WTF? The only explanation that I can think of for you holding such a belief is that in addition to having no understanding of genetics, you have no understanding of probability, and you are one of those special breed of idiots who somehow think if a fair coin is tossed 10 times and comes up heads every time, it is more likely to come up tails the next time. If this is what you really believe, I pity you for being retarded to this degree; and hope for the sake of society that you never breed.

>>1248016

/r/ GENOCIDE

>>1248429

>Young Earth Creationists

these people.. exist???

>>1248909
Same shit as the flat Earthers there are just more of them.