/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>25296442
No, I need showers, flush toilets, and electricity to survive.

I want to be a cat that lives in the forest of magic.

Already living ze dream ze!

Hail Austria

>>25296442
Of course I would love too, a simpler life without working for a company or paying taxes, just being free and living by myself in a beautiful forest with the sound of birds the greenery of the forest the color of flowers the clean air the peace...
I hate living in a city to much contamination and loud cars with no green, I would leave this life for a life in a forest it would be so peaceful

There was a manga about tiny forest girls, I forgot the name

>>25313796
>just being free
Enjoy spending twice as much time as you spend at work, but trying to gather basic materials to survive. Nature doesn't care if you feel sick one day, go hunt and gather resources or you'll die. There is nothing simple about living in the wilderness.

>>25372296
but atleast the work you do is for yourself and not for some company, it is another form of freedom in sense.

>>25372802
And what do you gain from that? More work, way more risk, less free time, less comfortable work place, much lower quality of life?
Unless you are incredibly lucky, you can never avoid work. But you can choose to do everything shitty but by yourself, or you can participate in society where everyone specializes in particular thing and exchange others work for your work. This way is way more efficient and secure. Wealth is not zero sum game, by cooperating with others you can live way better and longer than otherwise. You do not work for some company, you work for society so later society can work for you.
I bet you never had any higher position at some company to really witness how everyone cooperates with everyone else. Without that cooperation nothing would be done and we would be dying as kids working on farms.

>>25375122
true but if you are in situation where you just need care about food and such it is still most likely better than being slave to system, but if you really need to take care of medicine and such without knowledge of healthcare it can get quite harsh.
also i bet i never get to higher position since where i live you need to study to be cleaner, and the profession i have requires to know things that you most likely only get by working but you cant get the work since you dont know that shit, quite paradox.
and also true that nothing would be done without cooperation but if we talk about just single human beign taking care himself in nature with little cottage and tools to work with and it would be most likely just fine, even though medicines and such would be hard to come by. trading still most likely exist though so that would be solution.

also
>You do not work for some company, you work for society so later society can work for you.
yet company reaps the rewards of your work and you get just leftovers.

>>25376374
Or you can just not work for any company. You can start your own business, make a shop, start a farm, become and artist, and you'll realize how it really is. If you like nature, you can just move out to some village and make a shop there and still cooperate. Just be prepared that your own employee will see you as evil person as you see yours employer. Even though you'll mostly likely struggling just as much as them + some extra risk.

>yet company reaps the rewards of your work and you get just leftovers.
They don't really. Your work is worth as much as you can make others pay for it. Companies struggle to survive on market, they do not waste money. You are probably like all these people who hate on CEOs and do not realize how much stuff I'd going on behind the scenes and focus on "why worker who made a t-shirt gets paid 2$ if the shirt cost 100$ at shop" and stuff like that. No, everyone else in company is important as well, and they do work that small 2$ worker can't comprehend.
I personally have quite good salary, over 2 times the average. I also work close to the CEO of my company and I know he makes like 4 times more than me. But I wouldn't want to even do half of his work for the money he gets. It's just so fucking much responsibility, stress, soft skills, business trips, getting new clients, and taking care of all of this, it's literally crazy. Yet, a lot of people on my company got mad when they learned how much he makes. People are really clueless.

>>25371065
I'm pretty sure there's been like 50, with 45 of them being completely unremarkable.

>>25296442
I wish that I could but I know it isn't possible, you will be working every day just to survive, my quality of life would be much lower.
>>25376374
>yet company reaps the rewards of your work and you get just leftovers
You reap the rewards of your work in the present and the company reaps greater rewards in the future. Time matters, it is usually better to have something now rather than later.

>>25377086
>>25378207
well where i live bosses of these companies reap fat cash rewards as "bonuses" while they lower wages and kick people out.
also maybe some CEOs make lot of work but some of them are just sheltered employment with contacts.
not really motivate me to get job again.

>>25378338
You can always start your own company, and offer better service because you pay more to your employees, ie you get best of best of them easily. Sooner or latter you'll realize that fat cash is really nothing in comparison to total cash that your company operates on, and that these contracts do not come out of nowhere.
If CEO job is so easy, everyone would be a CEO.
If you do not like your boss, become your own boss and then you'll wish you had a boss to take care of everything, while you do just do your simple tasks and get money for them.

OP just wanted to make a thread where we could RP as tiny little forest people hazing fantasy forest lives and you dorks are talking about economic politics instead.

>>25378937
also there i matter of starting money that most people dont have (taking loans is also just bullshit since you always lose in that situation) and some people just born in status or situation they have more power or money than they can spent. do they deserve all that just because they won birth lottery?
just telling how hard it is to be CEO wont remove truth that there is lot of incompetent ones that just gets lots of money, that is ripped from back of basic workers.

its true that if dont want to work for other you have to start your own business but problem becomes that other business have more power and money, and money comes to money, you cant compete with big business, they just buy you out or use other means to dispose of your shity little enterprise.

>>25379843
They deserve it because their parents worked hard to provide them with these means. These means belong to their parents and they have full right to give it to their children. If I had children I would also want to be able to give my hard earned money to my children, instead of paying to children of parents who didn't worked hard. For many people, it's their children that is a real driver that makes them do well at work and contribute to the society.
Taking a financial risk is also part of being a CEO, so loans every now and then are fully expected. It's that risk that contribute to their salary.
Also CEOs take small portion of that total amount of money. It's easy to just focus on basic workers and forget about all the amortization, investments, insurance, infrastructure, logistics, marketing, fees, rents, management, HRs, etc. These things take the most of this.
You can easily compete with big business if you can provide better service. It depends on the sector of course, but there is many where you can just do your own small businesses and no one will care, like a grocery shop. Assuming a CEO takes half a money of the income, imagine how much more you can do if you only take as much as you need. Reduce prices by 25%, do some marketing and clients will flood.

>>25381597
yet no new big busineses have appeared in many years, most likely because bigger players make sure they dont get too big to cut their market share. also are you sure their parents work hard for what they have? maybe they got it same way as new generation got, just golden spoon in mouth, infinite money since dawn of christ, without doing jackshit...

also reducing prices? nope they increase that shit for maximum profit and rather see common man to starve than become too close to be equal.

>>25382390
it always was.

I just wanted to discuss tiny 2hus...

Alice has a fairy rape dungeon in her house.

>>25381823
Alright, I'd love to discuss who is responsible for what and preservation of inheritance, demand and supply, but I don't think it's good place for this.
But I can agree that big players kill their competition, like Comcast that is state/law enforced or that new controversy where all the biggest players were communicating with each other in illegal monopoly-like manner.

Sorry for disturbing the thread, have a nice day.

>>25296442
How tiny?

Can we have a tiny cabin with a tiny table to eat in peace? Pretty please!

>>25416485
Only if you're good~

OH NO!

>>25296442
yes but then the giants crush you

>>25420427
I'll bring alot lot lot of berries! As long as we can have peace time~

>>25296442
I will at one point, but God damn, there is so much to do before I can achieve it...

>>25296442
I like civilization a little more, so no.

>>25423102
Make weapons then, tame poisonous frogs gather their poison and use it In sharp objects then you get yourself armed really easily just like that

>>25296442
bumper

Living a tiny life can be pretty comfy

>>25378937
> If CEO job is so easy, everyone would be a CEO.
bruh that's like saying if being born into wealth is so easy then everyone would so it
doesn't work like that
you get to that position by having good connections, in some cases also hard work but in all cases luck is a huge component
while it's true that most CEOs may be taking on more work than their factory workers they're not doing the work at the level they are being compensated for
it's absurd to think that one person could do the work of 1000
obv not all CEOs or whatever but pretending that wealth inequality isn't a genuine and immediate problem in modern society is just blind

>>25507563
>tame poisonous frogs
I think at most you'd just get an experience like ants farming with aphids, where you come up with a convoluted system that is really a much less ideal symbiotic relationship for the tinies than any sort of animal husbandry. High costs to maintain an animal nearly as big as yourself for low extraction rates, most likely. And frogs would probably take a much longer time to genetically select for docility; it's not like bees ever really became "docile" by the layman's definition.

What would probably happens is that tinies would hunt those frogs and carefully extract the poison onto their weapons (like what is done in real life). It's just I assume tinies would take a much longer time than full-size humans to really deplete their population on account of greater parity, and it wasn't until massive deforestation and the spread of fungal diseases that poisonous frog species really started dying out in real life.

>>25378031
Names?

>>25618624
Hakumei to Mikochi, it's very comfy

>>25619055

>>25296442
No I do not.

>>25619055
Shouldn’t this go on /a/?