/lit/ - Literature

>>13527365
It's possible that she was pretending to look smart

>>13527328
Are you sure she was actually reading?
It's a bit difficult to believe.

>>13527314
Yikerino

>>13526856
He doesn't make a stance against philosophy but against the methods used to explain the origins and the formulation of moral doctrines used by other philosophers.

>>13526822
And you didn't manage to understand why he shits on other philosophers?

You never actually read him
did you?

>>13526184
Could you perhaps provide a photographic timestamp of your mammalian glands in order to verify your identity?

>>13525937
Just because you and a rock and a shit are all part of a greater one you should treat them equally?
>why would you do that?
So why would you treat other humans in any different way, just because we are all part of a greater one. It doesn't change anything.

>>13525900
>>13525902
So since we are all one, will you start treating a rock or a shit in the same way as humans?

>>13525893
I just want a normal and average looking girl who is a pure virgin with eyes only for me.
Is it too much?

>>13525782
>I have dark circles under my eyes
you lack proper under eye bone structure, consider orbital rim surgery
>half closed eyelids
ptosis

>>13520968
Intelligence is the ability to process information

>>13413695
Based

>>13408604
Anon, maybe i'm not attractive but i do live life as i wish and i'm quite satisfied with it.
If you think that the general population is happy just look at the depression statistics.

>>13408559
>Chads and Stacies represent the lifestyle of the general population aka normies
Kek imagine being this retarded

>>13408561
A set instinctual submissive behaviors towards an imaginary Alpha monkey.

>>13408506
Philip Bratz Mainlander

>>13408513
>t. actual brainlet

>>13408514
Normies are miserable to say the least

>>13408498
>My claim was always that high IQ people have tended throughout history to reproduce a lot less than low IQ people. This is pretty much academic consensus.
Any actual source on this claim?
That goes beyond the past 60 years?

>>13408498
What i'm saying is that for the majority of the history of our species there was a trend of increasing Iq levels. Which may not be the case currently due to the fact that the low Iq general population lives of the technological advances of the few geniuses.
And you do need a higher intelligence to grow crops at least as compared to our ancestors such as homo austolopitecus.

>>13408414
It. Frociazzo italiano

>>13408386
Learn German you pig

>>13408457
The faculty that allows you todo math, build tools or cooperate with others or pretty much do anything more than what monkeys do is called intelligence aka the ability of the brain to process information.
It is likely that for the majority of our species existence there was a selective pressure for it, that later on tgis allowed the development of language, culture, agriculture which then allowed an increase in population and concentration of the that population in a smaller area, which allowed specialization of production and knowledge (one field of which is math).
What do you even think intelligence is?
I don't get how in your mind apparently creating tools for agriculture or creating language is somehow different from solving math problems. It all requires a brain that works well.

>>13408412
Iq is a measure of the g factor. Which stands for general intelligence, and that is the capability of your brain to process the information of the external world in order to solve problems.
And yes the same faculty that allows you to solve mathematical problems is also the one that allows you to to create agriculture.