/lit/ - Literature

>>13914668
>Look I'm underage and I found this morally unacceptable concept in my book haha! I need to share it so people judge the book from a couple sentences haha!

A timeless classic.

>>13912344
'Murrica!

>>13899933
>>13899699
God's sign, anon.

>>13898243
It's not a book per se* Phoneposting :X

>>13898128
I've read this and could highly suggest it!
Although it's not a boon per se but rather a collection of lectures, you might need to focus more in order to absorb the fast-paced amount of info provided.
If you ever toyed with the idea of getting into Islam, just read his lecture on Mohammed, you won't ever consider that idea again.

>>13887807
Honestly I've seen a raise in Nietzsche posting. I would argue the rise of Catholicism in /lit/ also has it's side effects.

>>13863417
>It just is

>>13859679
No. You're not contributing to the discussion.

I was on my way from Uni when a weirdo approached me while I was reading my trusty Thus Spoke Zarathustra.
I always carry a Thus Spoke Zarathustra.
The weirdo asked me what I was reading and I told him read the back of the book!
He felt hirritated by my response which was outstandingly regular for me; I take adderall almost daily for my ADD.
He then went away after telling me I was rude and not surpised I was reading Nietzsche. I was like really?!

So basically now I get what something like a Kant enthusiast would look like.

>>13856723
>>13856878
You're not gonna read them anyway, I'm not sure why you bother asking. Is it the (You)'s?

>>13854675
I know this by heart anon, thanks for sharing!

>>13845420
Unsurprisingly the points you mentioned are the ones he might be recognized with the most. You have clearly never read him, or maybe you have, but you're one of the thousands projecting their mad defeated ego upon poor Friedrich.
Don't be mad if you don't understand him!


>le sage

>>13845903
>I don't believe Nietzsche was an atheist

>>13842338
Why?

>>13842030
Yeah not only that tho. Her takes and assumptions about certain concepts seem to be strictly personal, by her.

>>13841987
Interesting author anon, I will look into her.

>>13841661
Yes. It's a liberal and academic take on a philosophy that is by the design not possible to be subject of studying by the general cloud thought of the academia.

This picture is so contradictory.

>American... Nietzsche
>Female writer
>Academical and bleupilled gibberish that takes the wrong approach

What are your thoughts?

A novel about a wealthy prince in England around the 1700s. I'm putting a lot of Dostoyevsky vibes into it as just his presence in the town destabilizes the rural economy so drastically that the prince eventually gets overused and the rural people, especially the women that used him, slowly gain power and influence thus destabilizing the nobility in England and leading to an overthrow of the monarchy into a new aristocracy of a once poor family.

>>13834925
You forgot to mention your reddit proficiency and fedora-wearing ability.

>>13828567
>Believing in concepts such as being right or wrong, good or bad, good and evil...

>>13825690
You're programmed to be an NPC slave.