/lit/ - Literature

>>23413935
>I don't know, I just think it sounds really nice
Well no one's attracted to pompous retards Op, you learnt your lesson.

>>23414027
I posted the first three chapters of what I'm working on, I don't know how you get recognition if you're not doing some kind of fan fiction on here. Is there a way to tag original fantasy or something?

It's called Arakkea

>>23414046
No, they aren't. They're being interviewed by literal nobodies and are literal nobodies. Don't presume to know more about this than me, retard.

>>23414064
It's not even 101 Finance, moron. It's merely a story written to help people change their thinking about money. I've forgotten more about Finance than you've ever known, and that goes for most things, you pretentious fuck.

Been studying psychological complexes for personal reasons. From Jung and then building on Jung with John Ryan Haule and Steven Richards

>>23414007
i think rotoscoping like bakshi's lotr could be used to good effect for an ASOIAF show, mixing realism with fantastic elements. especially battle scenes. the cartoon network art style undermines the bleak tone of the series i think.

u gotta go for the painted backdrops i reckon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7wjqtTnegE
i think if it was to be animated on the cheap i'd rather see a scummier style, like this 1992 macbeth animation
https://youtu.be/qfnUq2_0FOY?t=423

>>23414083
Don’t. You’ll regret it.

>>23412291
can you tell me anything about sinuhe?

>>23414083
This anon is right in that a relationship can't fix you if you're broken. A good women can provide assistance in the process (and a bad one can make it infinitely worse), but you ultimately have to walk the walk yourself in any case. Otherwise instead of being alone and depressed you will be balls deep in qt cupping her supple breast at night in your hands and still depressed, probably even more so.

>"T-THAT'S IMPOSSBLE~"
We know that you don't know, that's the whole issue.

>>23413803
literal who?

>>23414001
Putting the animals in the position of consumers in both scenarios is an even worse comparison for you guys.
Reading is something that animals can just not do. A chimp being able to write Shakespeare may be possible given an infinite amount of chimps and an infinite amount of time but a chimp reading Shakespeare is just something that would never happen.
There. There's your 1 to 1 comparison that is even worse than the original one.
FAQ
>b-b-b-but what about creating media
The OP is talking about consuming media, not creating media. Like I told you before, read the OP and my previous replies again.
>b-b-b-but creating videogames takes cognitive ability!!! neither a chimp nor a fish can create a videogame!!!
How many times do I have to tell you guys? Read the OP again. I am countering the idea that "gaming takes cognitive ability". Not that "creating videogames takes cognitive ability." You fucking retards. Stop responding to me.
>b-b-but looking at a book is the same as reading it, i could just train a monkey to look at a book
Looking at a book isn't the same as reading it.
>b-b-but apes can "learn" sign language, they could probably consume Shakespeare somehow.
This is an idea that has been sensationalized and if the ape's "sign language" was coming from a human they would be considered retarded and unable to comprehend speech. The ape can learn about ~5 words and just signs for bananas whenever trying to communicate.
>b-b-but if looking at a book and reading a book are different, then the way inputs are sourced from the goldfish means that the fish isn't actually playing the game
True. The fish isn't actually playing the game. That's what makes the claim that "gaming takes cognitive ability" even more pathetic. The fish wasn't even trying to beat the game and still managed to do so.

>>23413692
It literally says souls aren’t real you cretin. Stop getting your information on Buddhism from 30 year old single women.

i'm studying the literary tradition of the tomboy, though i often distract myself with darker, more adult books. so far i've read the hidden hand, little women, katie woodlawn, gypsy brenton, to kill a mocking bird, a country doctor, my ántonia (the best), and o pioneers. i still have to read heidi, anne of greene gables, the little house on the prarie and hellfire hotchkiss if i can find a copy.

>>23414007
Kek that art makes her look like a pothead from any urban yoga studio.
Anyway, I’d prefer Treasure Planet style animation. Suitably grand and beautiful while being fluid and lively. Something as stylised as Tartakovsky’s animation would be a mistake, the people should look like actual humans.

>>23413946
shut up zoomer. your generation is retarded

My diary.

>>23413479
Seneca

>>23412267
you folded to a woman dude

>>23409203
>>23414055
I was lonely, but now I have a 6/10 girlfriend and I kinda wish I was single again. I might drive her away just so I can get some peace and quiet.

>>23414059
>>23414076
These here two PUAs
>"stick to those 3"
>"rule of thumb"
>"avoid ick"
>"strategies"
>"build dependence"
>"avoid dissonance"
>"power dynamics"

Me:
>interact with a women the way I feel like
>obtain relationship and/or sex if I want to

You niggas are legit defective fr.

>>23412076
I haven't read nearly as much aa I would have liked to but I did feel immensely positive and a strong will to live after reading The Odyssey.

>>23414062
>>23414077
very well, thanks for the kind response, I will try to work on my story and maybe go back here once I done with it, thanks anon

>>23413292
Kanye West

>>23413266
yeah this is better, anon, you are able to write but I would say that your prose does come across as a bit impenetrable. I'd recommend putting some of the dialogue on new lines and just generally trying to structure it to be more readable. But yeah, keep going

>>23414058
If you didn't say you were ESL I wouldn't have known by your post. Your skill seems good enough to write a story, and errors you make along the way will help you learn the language better. Definitely do it.