/lit/ - Literature

>>5041371
It is par excellence but I'm too lazy to say why but let us understand that it has a lot to do with it being a very basic narrative structure which is found in most works of literature and which follows a structure going like "first state; altered state; back to first state".

took a course on this stuff, our teacher would first ask students to take out any books out of their stuff and if he had read them, he'd show how it contains this narrative structure, and how it is oedipian, and then would ask people for three random words out of which he would rewrite the story.

narcissic elation also is a very oedipian thing, most romantic literature is centered around an oedipian structure and protip it has nothing to do with the usual narrative structure of "first state; trouble;back to first state", it is something else, well, really I gotta go in 20 mins and I'm real fucking lazy, maybe tomorrow I guess.

>>5042302
So Sartre was always in half conflict with Simone?

>>5042279
>tfw I was about to say fucks and I changed my mind and wrote faggots because it came to my mind as it also started with an f

>>5042273
>having shit taste in literature

>>5042240
>this is what socially awkward faggots think

>>5042263
see >>5042212

>>5042231
But I was out for most of the week

>>5042100
>500 BCE
>Leg V
lollllllllllllll

>>5042098
Montherlant's The Young Girls
Montherlant's Chaos and Night

notes
from
the
underground

>>5042047
>dating, flighty
>lol
>War and Peace I guess
>Flaubert's three tales

>>5040600
would his dark materials be like this

>>5042082
Wilde, Huymans, Ellis

>>5041760
lold

This anger and contempt you/we feel for being, for now (hopefully) part of the masses.

some white stuff just came out of my dick as I was peeing

what is it /lit/

should I see a physician

>>5041669
Your answer is retarded. OP needs to punch someone, not get punched.

>>5041651
I don't have enough morals to do nice things to others but I have enough to feel bad about it once it's done. Limitations of thought, I guess.

>>5041629
thx

>>5041574
see >>5041554

>>5041566
If you understand useful as 'what benefits mankind' then you are absolutely wrong.

If you understand useful as 'what benefits one' then you are absolutely wrong.

>>5041549
I'm cool.

>>5041547
Sophocles
Aeschylus
Euripides
Shakespeare
Molière
Racine

>>5041527
more proof

>proof
>in an absurd world
kek